Activity Scale Research Articles

Patients' joint perception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as a reliable patient-reported outcome measure.

This study aims to evaluate and compare patients' joint perception (PJP) with other commonly employed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a cohort of patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A retrospective study was conducted on 108 patients who underwent ACLR between 2017 and 2021, with complete data available for visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, PJP, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Tegner Activity Scale, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS)and The Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS) at a mean follow-up of 3 years. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used to determine the correlations between clinical scores. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the discriminatory power of the chosen PROMs in detecting natural joint perception. Natural joint perception was defined as patients responding 'like a native or natural joint' or PJP = 1. This study hypothesized that PJP would demonstrate significant correlations with established PROMs, indicating its reliability and validity as a tool for assessing outcomes following ACLR. PJP showed significant correlations with all the reported PROMs, suggesting its potential as a valid and reliable assessment tool for evaluating ACLR outcomes. The ROC curve analysis indicated a good area under the curve for identifying natural joint perception using various PROMs. According to the PJP, nearly 20% of patients reported natural joint perception. This study evaluates PJP as a reliable tool for assessing patient outcomes following ACLR. Its significant correlation with other established PROMs underscores its potential as a valuable addition to the existing array of PROMs in ACLR. Level III.

Physical Activity Levels in Persons With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pain and symptoms of patellofemoral pain (PFP) are often exacerbated during daily activities, which may result in reduced overall physical activity levels. To summarize the evidence for physical activity levels among persons with PFP compared with pain-free controls. PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched from January 1, 2000 to February 22, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies published in English that measured physical activity subjectively or objectively in persons with PFP and pain-free controls. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Level 1. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI are reported based on Hedges' g effect sizes. From 23,745 records, 41 studies met the eligibility criteria. There was high-to-moderate-certainty evidence that persons with PFP reported higher physical activity levels compared with pain-free controls using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SMD, 0.27; 95% CI 0.03, 0.51), whereas lower physical activity levels compared with pain-free controls using the Tegner Activity Scale (SMD, -0.31; 95% CI -0.57, -0.04). There was low-to-moderate-certainty evidence that there was no group difference in physical activity levels using the Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI -0.09, 0.44) or self-reported sports participation duration (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI -0.98, 0.05). There was high-certainty evidence that runners with PFP reported shorter running distances compared with pain-free runners (SMD, -0.36, 95% CI -0.57, -0.14). No data pooling was possible for objectively measured physical activity levels due to device heterogeneity (ie, different algorithms used to quantify the intensity of physical activity). Self-reported physical activity levels among persons with PFP were inconsistent depending on the physical activity measurement tool used or which specific physical activity was measured. Clinicians should integrate multiple physical activity assessment tools to determine the extent to which PFP influences physical activity levels. PROSPERO #CRD42022314598.

Defining clinically relevant outcome thresholds for pain and function after osteochondral autograft transplantation of the knee.

To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for measures of pain and function at 2, 5 and 10 years after osteochondral autograft transplantations (OATs). Patients undergoing OATs of the knee were identified from a prospectively maintained cartilage surgery registry. Baseline demographic, injury and surgical factors were collected. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) were collected at baseline, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Marx activity scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. The MCIDs were quantified for each metric utilizing a distribution-based method equivalent to one-half the standard deviation of the mean change in outcome score. The percentage of patients achieving MCID as a function of time was assessed. Of 63 consecutive patients who underwent OATs, 47 (74.6%) patients were eligible for follow-up (surgical date before October 2021) and had fully completed preoperative PROMs. A total of 39 patients (83%) were available for a minimum 2-year follow-up, with a mean (±standard deviation) follow-up of 5.8 ± 3.4 years. The MCIDs were determined to be 9.3 for IKDC, 2.5 for Marx, 7.4 for KOS-ADLS and 12.9 for pain. At 2 years, 78.1% of patients achieved MCID for IKDC, 77.8% for Marx, 75% for KOS-ADLS and 57.9% for pain. These results were generally maintained through 10-year follow-ups, with 75% of patients achieving MCID for IKDC, 80% for Marx, 80% for KOS-ADLS and 69.8% for pain. The majority of patients achieved a clinically relevant outcome improvement after OATs of the knee, with results sustained through 10-year follow-up. Patients who experience clinically relevant outcome improvement after OATs in the short term continue to experience sustained benefits at longer-term follow-up. These data provide valuable prognostic information when discussing patient candidacy and the expected trajectory of recovery. Level III.

Assessment of Function in Patients after Calcaneal Fracture Treatment with the Ilizarov Method.

Background: Up to 75% of calcaneal fractures are intra-articular fractures, which may severely impair foot function and lead to disability. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures who had been treated with the Ilizarov method in the period 2021-2022. The mean patient age was 47 years (range 25-67 years). We analyzed the following functional parameters: foot function with a revised foot function index (FFI-R) questionnaire and the level of physical activity, with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, a visual analog scale (VAS), and a Grimby physical activity level scale; and ankle range of motion. Results: We observed a significant improvement in the UCLA activity scores and Grimby activity score at long-term follow-up. Functional outcomes based on the FFI-R questionnaires showed an improvement, from 292 points prior to surgery to 127 points at follow-up, p = 0.013. The post-treatment follow-up measurements revealed a median dorsiflexion at the treated ankle joint of 20 degrees, whereas that at the intact ankle was 40 degrees, p = 0.007. The plantar flexion showed asymmetry, with a median 15 degrees at the treated ankle and 30 degrees at the intact ankle, p = 0.007. The median range of inversion at the ankle joint was 5 degrees in the treated limb and 15 degrees in the intact limb, p = 0.039. Conclusions: Patients with calcaneal fractures treated with the Ilizarov method are recommended to have a longer and more intensive rehabilitation. The range of ankle motion in the treated limb was limited in comparison with that in the intact limb; however, this did not greatly affect the patients' return to their earlier, pre-injury level of physical activity.

Retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative joint stability between all-inside PCL reconstruction technique and conventional PCL reconstruction technique in patients with multiligament knee injury

ObjectivesThe purpose of our study was to compare (1) posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, (2) patient-reported outcome, and (3) complications after the all-inside PCL reconstruction (Al-PCLR) technique and conventional PCLR (CON-PCLR) technique at minimum 2-year follow-up. We hypothesized that AI-PCLR and CONV-PCLR would yield similar results in PCL laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. MethodA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent PCLR with the Al-PCLR technique and CON-PCLR technique from 2012 to 2023 in a single hospital. Medical records were reviewed for patients’ demographic data, the technique of PCL reconstruction and complications. Patient-reported outcome scores, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm score, as well as bilateral kneeling radiographs and physical examinations, were collected at least 2 years postoperatively. ResultsIncluded in the study were 24 patients: 11 who underwent the CON-PCLR technique (mean age 40.7 +years) and 13 who underwent Al-PCLR (mean age 34.3 + 12.9 years). Three patients in AI-PCLR group were lost to follow-up and one patient is the CON-PCLR group, a revision case, was excluded from the study.Bilateral stress kneeling radiographs showed a similar side-to-side difference between two groups (CON-PCLR vs AL-PCLR: mean 7.5 ± 5.2 vs 5.8 ± 4.8 mm; P = 0.38) There were no statically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative IKDC (CON-PCLR vs AL-PCLR: 68.9 vs 73.9; P = 0.37), Lysholm (89.1 vs 94.1; P = 0.42), or Tegner activity (6 vs 6.4; P = 0.68) scores. ConclusionAll-inside PCLR demonstrates comparable stability to Conventional PCLR, with satisfactory patient-report outcome at minimum 2 years follow up and low rate of complications in patients with multiligament knee injury.Level of evidence: III Retrospective comparative study.

Hyperadrenergic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Biomarkers and Response to Guanfacine.

A subset of patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) are thought to have a primary hyperadrenergic cause. We assessed clinical biomarkers to identify those that would benefit from sympatholytic therapy. We measured sympathetic function (supine muscle sympathetic nerve activity, upright plasma norepinephrine, and blood pressure responses to the Valsalva maneuver) in 28 patients with POTS (phenotyping cohort) to identify clinical biomarkers that are associated with responsiveness to the central sympatholytic guanfacine in a separate uncontrolled treatment cohort of 38 patients that had received guanfacine clinically for suspected hyperadrenergic POTS (HyperPOTS). In the phenotyping cohort, an increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >17 mm Hg during late phase 2 of the Valsalva maneuver identified patients with the highest quartile of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (HyperPOTS) with 71% sensitivity and 85% specificity. In the treatment cohort, patients with HyperPOTS, identified by this clinical biomarker, more often reported clinical improvement (85% versus 44% in nonhyperadrenergic; P=0.016), had better orthostatic tolerance (∆Orthostatic Hypotension Daily Activities Scale: -1.9±0.9 versus 0.1±0.5; P=0.032), and reported less chronic fatigue (∆PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a: -12.9±2.7 versus -2.2±2.2; P=0.005) in response to guanfacine. These results are consistent with the concept that POTS is caused by a central sympathetic activation in a subset of patients, which can be identified clinically by an exaggerated DBP increase during phase 2 of the Valsalva maneuver and improved by central sympatholytic therapy. These results support further clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of guanfacine in patients with POTS enriched for the presence of this clinical biomarker.

Reliability and concurrent validity of the Active Movement Scale (AMS) in adults with musculoskeletal disorders.

The Active Movement Scale (AMS) is a brief screen for identifying movement impairments affecting functional task performance. To assess inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and concurrent validity of the AMS in adults with musculoskeletal disorders. Fifty-five subjects (mean age: 61.3±15.3 years) transitioning from physical therapy attended two sessions. The 14-item AMS was assessed by two therapists, resulting in a total score (AMST) and two sub-scores: upper body (AMSU) and lower body (AMSL). Moreover, subjects completed PROMIS Physical Function-10a (PPF), Lifestyle Physical Function (LPF), Cardio Activity Level (CAL) surveys, Two Square Agility Test (TSAT), WorkAbility Rate of Manipulation Turning (WRMT) and Placing (WRMP), Grip Strength (GS), 10-Meter Walk Usual (GSU) and Fast (GSF) pace, and Grooved Pegboard Placing (GPP) and Remove (GPR) tests. Inter-rater reliability coefficients for AMST, AMSU, and AMSL were 0.96, 0.92, and 0.96, respectively, with individual item reliability ranging from 0.58 to 1.0. Test-retest reliability for these assessments yielded coefficients of 0.93, 0.84, and 0.94, with individual item reliability ranging from 0.47 to 0.88. No floor effects were observed, but mild ceiling effects were noted. AMST showed a high correlation with LPF (r = 0.72) and moderate correlation with PPF (r = 0.64) surveys. AMSU had moderate correlations with GPP (r = 0.61) and WRMP (r = 0.57) tests, while AMSL correlated moderately with GSF (r = 0.55) and TSAT (r = 0.50) tests. This study provides evidence of the reliability and validity of AMS in adults with musculoskeletal disorders to support transitions between rehabilitation and fitness programs.

Single-bundle ACL combined with ALL reconstruction yields comparable outcomes in patients with varied anatomical risk factors for ACL graft failure

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is influenced by factors such as meniscal tears and tibial plateau slope. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has reduced failure rates; however, its efficacy in high-risk patients remains unclear. This study hypothesized that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would yield similar clinical outcomes in patients with varying risks of ACL failure.Patients and methodsA total of 76 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction between June 2018 and June 2021 were included. The medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee joint. The meniscal lesions were assessed during surgery. Preoperative clinical assessments and final follow-up were conducted using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner Activity scale. PROMs were collected at least two years postoperatively.ResultsThe average follow-up was 32.5 ± 7.4 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative IKDC score, Lysholm score, or Tegner activity score between patients with or without medial meniscus injury (p = 0.155, 0.914, and 0.042, respectively), with or without lateral meniscus injury (p = 0.737, 0.569, and 0.942, respectively), medial tibial slope > 12° or ≤ 12° (p = 0.290, 0.496, and 0.988, respectively), or lateral tibial slope > 7.4° or ≤ 7.4° (p = 0.213, 0.625, and 0.922, respectively). No significant correlations were found between anterior tibial translation and postoperative IKDC (R = -0.058, p = 0.365), Lysholm (R = -0.017, p = 0.459), or Tegner activity scores (R = -0.147, p = 0.189).ConclusionOur study demonstrates that single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction provides reliable and comparable clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk factors for ACL graft failure, such as increased tibial slope or meniscal injury. Our results suggest that the indications for ALL reconstruction may be expanded to include patients with a high tibial slope or meniscal injury, because these factors have been shown to contribute to increased rotational instability and high rates of ACL graft failure. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with large patient cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and establish clear guidelines for patient selection and surgical decision-making.Level of evidenceLevel 3.

Patients undergoing multiligamentknee reconstruction injured during pivoting sports demonstrate similar clinical, functionaland return to sport outcomes by 2 years compared with those undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

This study investigates the clinical and activity-based outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR) following a pivoting sports injury. Fifty MLKR patients were included, of which 20 (40%) were injured during pivoting sports. A further 50 patients undergoing ACLR following an injury during pivoting sports were consecutively recruited for comparison. Patients were assessed before the surgery and at 6-, 12- and 24 months with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Tegner activity scale (TAS) and anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score. Knee movement, the single (SHD) and triple (THD) hop tests for distance, and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength were assessed, with Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) calculated. Outcomes were compared across groups: (1) ACLR (n = 50), (2) MLKR (n = 50)and (3) MLKR due to pivoting sport injury (n = 20). IKDC, TAS and ACL-RSI scores remained lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR versus ACLR cohort at all timepoints. Comparing the ACLR and MLKR cohort that had injuries specifically during pivoting sports, the IKDC (p < 0.001) and TAS (p = 0.009) were higher in the ACLR group at 6 months, and the ACL-RSI was higher at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.007) months, there were no further differences. Hop and knee extensor strength LSIs were lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR (versus ACLR) cohort at all timepoints (apart from the 24-month SHD LSI). However, the ACLR group only demonstrated greater LSIs than the pivoting sport MLKR for the SHD at 6 months (p < 0.001), and knee extensor strength at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p < 0.001) months. While the recovery of patients undergoing MLKR due to a pivoting sports injury is delayed compared with their ACLR counterparts, the clinical outcome and activity profile are similar by 24 months. Level IV.

Relationship between NT-proBNP, echocardiographic abnormalities and functional status in patients with subclinical siabetic cardiomyopathy

IntroductionPersons with diabetes are at risk for developing a cardiomyopathy through several pathophysiological mechanisms independent of traditional risk factors for heart failure. Among those with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM), the relationship between natriuretic peptides, cardiac structural abnormalities and functional capacity is largely unknown.MethodsIn this prespecified subgroup analysis of the Aldose Reductase Inhibition for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure (ARISE-HF) trial, 685 participants with asymptomatic DbCM underwent baseline echocardiography data, laboratory investigations, and functional assessments. Participants were stratified by N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) quartiles, and correlation with echocardiographic and functional parameters were assessed using Spearman correlation test.ResultsThe median NT-proBNP was 71 (Q1, Q3: 33, 135) ng/L. No association was observed between NT-proBNP concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of either diastolic or systolic dysfunction including global longitudinal strain, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, E/E’, or right ventricular systolic pressure. In contrast, NT-proBNP was significantly correlated with overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (rho = − 0.10; p = 0.007), the Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly (rho = − 0.12; p = 0.004), duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (rho = − 0.28; p < 0.001), peak VO2 (rho = − 0.26; p < 0.001), and ratio of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (rho = 0.12; p = 0.002). After adjustment for known confounders, the correlation with Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly and overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score was no longer significant.ConclusionAmong patients with subclinical DbCM, elevated NT-proBNP concentrations are associated with worse health status, lower activity levels, and reduced functional capacity, but not with cardiac structural abnormalities. These findings suggest that regardless of cardiac structural abnormalities, biomarker concentrations reflect important deterioration in functional capacity in affected individuals.Trial registrationARISE-HF, NCT 04083339 Date Registered August 23, 2019.Graphical abstractAbnormal ECHO defined as Myocardial Global Longitudinal Strain < − 16 or left ventricular mass index > 95 for females or > 115 for males or E/e’ >13 or left atrial volume index > 34. †Normal ECHO is defined as the absence of these abnormalities. Low NT-proBNP is defined as < 71 ng/L while high NT-proBNP is defined as ≥ 71 ng/L.

Comparable Pain Levels and Functional Outcomes With and Without the Use of Dermal Allograft Augmentation in Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair

PurposeTo retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic gluteal tendon repair with and without the use of dermal allograft augmentation. MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data, single-surgeon cohort study was performed on all patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair (GMR) and gluteus medius repair with augmentation (GMR-A) between April 2017 and April 2022. Dermal allograft augmentation was utilized in cases where intraoperative gluteus tissue quality was poor. An electronic survey of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was completed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. PROMs included a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale; modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS); Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS); and a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for each PROM were compared between groups. ResultsSixty-four patients were reached for follow-up (26 GMR, 38 GMR-A). No differences were found between the groups in terms of demographics. There was a significantly longer time to follow-up in the GMR group (39.4±26.9 vs 24.2±11.7 months, p=0.003). There were no differences between the GMR and GMR-A groups in terms of postoperative PROMs including VAS (3.3±2.6 vs 3.3±2.8, p=0.99), UCLA (5.8±2.1 vs 5.1±2.0, p=0.17), mHHS (70.1±18.1 vs 68.9±17.8, p=0.80), HOS-SSS (67.7±28.9 vs 62.5±30.2, p=0.50), and SANE (71.7±27.9 vs 71.3±22.8, p=0.95). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the GMR group achieved a PASS for UCLA (64% vs. 34%, p=0.02). One patient each in the GMR (3.8%) and GMR-A (2.6%) groups underwent revision gluteus medius repair with dermal allograft augmentation at the final follow-up. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes with and without the use of dermal allograft augmentation in endoscopic gluteus medius repairs. Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative series

Meaning of home attenuates the relationship between functional limitations and active aging

Background and aimsActive aging is the process through which people strive to maintain wellbeing when growing old. Addressing the lack of research on active aging in the context of housing, the aim was to describe active aging among people aged 55 and older considering relocation and investigate whether perceived housing moderates the relationship between functional limitations and active aging.MethodsWe utilized cross-sectional data from a sub-sample (N = 820; mean age = 69.7; 54% women) of the Prospective RELOC-AGE. Functional limitations were reported using 10 dichotomous questions. Active aging was assessed with the University of Jyvaskyla Active Aging Scale (UJACAS; 17 items, self-rated for four perspectives). Perceived housing was self-rated with four usability questions and meaning of home (MOH; 28 items). Cross-sectional associations and interactions were analysed using linear regression models, adjusting for gender and educational level.ResultsEach functional limitation decreased the active aging score by almost five points (p < 0.001). Usability did not moderate that relationship while MOH significantly attenuated the association between functional limitations and active aging (p = 0.039). Those with high MOH had two points less decrease in active aging score compared to those with low MOH.Discussion and conclusionsHaving a home with more personal meaning attached to it seems to provide more ability and opportunity for meaningful activities, thus supporting active aging despite functional limitations. This sheds new light on the known association between MOH and different aspects of wellbeing in old age and has relevance for theory development, housing policies and housing counselling targeting younger older adults.

Correlation between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Score at 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Mid-Term Functional Test Results: An Observational Study at 5-Year Follow-Up.

Background/Objectives: Evaluations allowing patients to return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) should be multimodal, including a psychological evaluation. The goal of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the ACL-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score at 6 months post-ACLR and mid-term functional results. Methods: A total of 498 patients were assessed 6 months after primary ACLR using a composite test including isokinetics, hops, and ACL-RSI. A minimum of 3 years of follow-up was necessary. At the last follow-up, each patient completed clinical and functional evaluations, including the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale, Self Knee Value (SKV), and ACL-RSI score. The results were compared overall and item by item. Results: At the last follow-up, the mean SKV, Tegner, IKDC, and ACL-RSI scores were 86.8 ± 14.3%, 6 ± 2.1, 77 ± 11.9%, and 68.8 ± 25.7%, respectively. A significant correlation existed between the 6-month ACL-RSI score and each functional test (respectively, ρ = 0.189 p < 0.001; ρ = 0.174 p < 0.001; ρ = 0.237 p < 0.001). The ACL-RSI score was significantly higher than at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.001). Over half (59.2%) of the cohort returned to an equal or greater level of activity, and there was a significant correlation between the 6-month ACL-RSI score and post-surgery level of activity. Conclusions: Patients with better ACL-RSI scores at 6 months post-ACLR have better functional results in the medium term and are more likely to RTS. Our results show a correlation between psychological factors at 6 months, measured through the ACL-RSI score, and activity level at mid-term follow-up. This study underlines the relationship between RTS and psychological effects, and the importance of ACLR rehabilitation to focus on decreasing apprehension and fear.

Validity of the Short Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in patients with Parkinson disease and nonmanifesting LRRK2 and GBA carriers.

Subtle executive dysfunction is common in people newly diagnosed with Parkinson disease (PD), even when general cognitive abilities are intact. This study examined the Short Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA-10)'s known-group construct validity, comparing persons with PD to healthy controls (HCs) and nonmanifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA gene mutations to HCs. Additionally, convergent and ecological validity was examined. The study included 73 participants: 22 with idiopathic PD (iPD) who do not carry any of the founder GBA mutations or LRRK2-G2019S, 29 nonmanifesting carriers of the G2019S-LRRK2 (n = 14) and GBA (n = 15) mutations, and 22 HCs. Known-group validity was determined using the WCPA-10, convergent validity by also using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Color Trails Test (CTT), and ecological validity by using the WCPA-10, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (SE ADL), and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Known-group validity of the WCPA-10 was established for the iPD group only; they followed fewer rules (p = 0.020), were slower (p = 0.003) and less efficient (p = 0.001), used more strategies (p = 0.017) on the WCPA-10, and achieved significantly lower CTT scores (p < 0.001) than the HCs. The nonmanifesting carriers and HCs were similar on all cognitive tests. Convergent and ecological validity of the WCPA-10 were partially established, with few correlations between WCPA-10 outcome measures and the MoCA (r = 0.50, r = 0.41), CTT-2 (r = 0.43), SE ADL (r = 0.41), and PASE (r = 0.54, r = 0.46, r = 0.31). This study affirms the known-group validity for most (four) WCPA-10 scores and partially confirms its convergent and ecological validity for PD.

Postoperative Effusion-Synovitis Is Associated With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Purpose(1) to investigate the consecutive changes in effusion-synovitis following primary arthroscopic treatment for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), and (2) to determine the effect of postoperative effusion-synovitis on clinical outcomes. MethodsData between March 2021 and January 2022 was reviewed. Patients diagnosed with FAIS and undergoing hip arthroscopic treatment were included. Exclusion criteria were incomplete magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, prior history of hip surgery, labral reconstruction, and concomitant hip conditions. MRI (non-contrast 3.0 T) was performed preoperatively and 3, 6, 12-month postoperatively, and the measurement of the largest femoral neck fluid thickness (FTM) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the effusion-synovitis were collected. Preoperative and a minimum of 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores including Visual Analog pain Scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and international Hip Outcome Tool, 12-component form (iHOT-12) were collected and compared. Postoperative Tegner activity scale was also collected. The PROs and achievements of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared between patients with and without postoperative effusion-synovitis. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of the effusion-synovitis size on PROs. ResultsA total of 61 patients (61 hips) were included in the study. The 3-month postoperative FTM, CSA and grade of effusion-synovitis presented a significant increase compared to the preoperative values (all with P < .05). No significant differences were observed in the 6-month postoperative measurements compared to the preoperative values (all with P > .05). At the 12-month follow-up, although there was a significant decrease in all measurements compared to the preoperative values (all with P < .001), 39 patients (63.9%) still presented effusion-synovitis. Compared to the other 22 patients (36.1%) without effusion-synovitis, these patients presented inferior mHHS, iHOT-12 (all with P < .05), as well as lower achievement of PASS of mHHS (82.1% vs 100%, P = .035) and iHOT-12 (38.5% vs 81.8%, P = .001). The achievement of MCID of mHHS (79.5% vs 77.3%, P = .839) and iHOT-12 (89.7% vs 95.5%, P = .839) were comparable between patients with and without effusion-synovitis. The postoperative sagittal CSA (Beta = -.302, P = .039) were negatively related to mHHS in the regression analysis. ConclusionAfter arthroscopic treatment for FAIS, the level of effusion-synovitis presented an initial increase, then followed by a subsequent decrease. Effusion-synovitis was significantly alleviated at 12 months compared to the preoperative level. Patients with postoperative effusion-synovitis had inferior clinical outcomes and lower achievement of PASS compared to those without. Level of EvidenceLevel IV; retrospective case series.

Rotating Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Greater Arc of Motion Gains for Patients Who Have Severe Arthrofibrosis

BackgroundArthrofibrosis is a common postoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complication that results in limited range of motion (ROM). There is limited literature on outcomes after revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis based on preoperative ROM restriction. The aims of this study were to: (1) examine ROM trajectory after rTKA for arthrofibrosis patients who have severe versus nonsevere limitations; (2) compare ROM gains and final arc of motion (AOM) between severe and nonsevere cohorts; (2a) compare ROM gain in a severe cohort treated with a rotating hinge (RH) versus a non-RH (NRH) construct; and (3) assess the impact of arthrofibrosis severity on patient-reported outcome measures. MethodsPatients were divided into 2 groups: group A had preoperative ROM < 70° (severe), and group B had preoperative ROM > 70° (non-severe). Patients were assessed clinically using AOM gain, absolute ROM, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement, lower extremity activity scale, and pain scores. Postoperative gains in AOM were compared between both groups. ResultsA total of 56 rTKAs (group A (severe): n = 36, group B (non-severe): n = 20) were performed for patients who have postoperative fibrosis. Group B had better ROM at the 1-year time point (group B: 95.9 ± 22.5 degrees versus group A: 83.2 ± 25.7 degrees). Group A had significantly better improvement in absolute AOM than group B (31.1 ± 20.9 versus 11.4 ± 25.0 degrees, P < 0.01). The RH group demonstrated significantly better absolute AOM gain than the NRH group (41.3 ± 19.4 versus 18.3 ± 15.2 degrees, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures between groups A and B or between RH and NRH groups at the final follow-up. ConclusionsFinal ROM achieved between severe and nonsevere arthrofibrosis groups was similar, and patients who have severe arthrofibrosis can expect greater absolute ROM gains and similar functional outcomes than nonsevere arthrofibrosis patients. The RH rTKAs provided greater AOM gains for patients who have severe arthrofibrosis, with equivalent functional outcomes to non-RH implants. For severe arthrofibrosis patients, RH designs provided twice the overall ROM gain; however, longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether RH designs have inferior overall implant survivorship.

Development and application of a learning enjoyment scale for pedagogical activities.

The impact of learning enjoyment on motivation, enthusiasm, and overall learning experiences is significant. Previous studies, lacking an unbiased tool for measuring enjoyment and confronting various influencing factors, produced conflicting results regarding enjoyment levels in different instructional methods. Hence, we developed a learning enjoyment scale for evaluating both active and passive educational activities. We applied the developed scale to 112 first-year medical and dental students to assess their enjoyment during didactic physiology lectures and explored possible associated factors. Within this data note, we present students' responses to the developed LES. The LES encompasses six dimensions: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, concentration, and enjoyment. Students provided ratings for each dimension on a five-point Likert scale, spanning from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The cumulative scores across the six dimensions range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. These total scores can be categorized as excellent (> 24), acceptable (18-24), or low (< 18). The second section of the dataset examines specific factors influencing overall enjoyment, such as teacher proficiency, topic difficulty, active student participation, objectives fulfillment, low stress levels, and self-perceived acquisition of skills. In addition to objective measurement of students' enjoyment level, the LES can be utilized for quantitative cross-comparisons between different teaching activities. By employing this dataset, we will undertake an analysis to determine the internal consistency of the Learning Enjoyment Scale (LES), with the anticipation that the outcomes will be published in another venue.

Younger age is a risk factor for developing recurrent or postoperative osteochondritis dissecans after surgery for discoid lateral meniscus with/without preoperative osteochondritis dissecans.

To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment of the discoid lateral meniscus with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) through clinical and radiological evaluations, focusing on recurrent or postoperative OCD occurrence. This retrospective study included patients with symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus with OCD (pre-OCD group) and without OCD (non-OCD group) who had undergone arthroscopic surgery with >5 years of follow-up. Age, sex, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, surgical procedure, and recurrent or postoperative OCD lesions were compared. The association between patient variables and postoperative OCD was determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the 95 knees, 15 (15%) were in the pre-OCD group. Healing was observed in 14/15 (93%) knees. Recurrent and postoperative OCDs were reported in 4/15 (28.5%) knees in the pre-OCD and 7/80 (8.8%) knees in the non-OCD groups at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.1 and 3.7 ± 1.2 years, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner activity scale and Lysholm scores were higher in the pre-OCD group but similar to those in the non-OCD group. The incidence of recurrent OCD in the pre-OCD group was significantly higher than that of postoperative OCD in the non-OCD group. Younger patients (odds ratio, 0.49; p = 0.003) had an increased risk of experiencing recurrent or postoperative OCD in multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff age for distinguishing recurrent or postoperative OCD was 9 years. Surgical procedures for OCD lesions in the pre-OCD group were successful. Multivariate analysis identified age as a risk factor for recurrent or postoperative OCD; therefore, conservative treatment is recommended for patients with discoid lateral meniscus before preadolescence to prevent postoperative OCD occurrence. Level III.

Ecosystem risk from human use of ocean space and resources: A case study from the Norwegian coast

Coastal and adjacent shelf waters are generally highly productive ecosystems harboring important ecological processes and exposed to a range of anthropogenic pressures from land-based and marine sectors. Ensuring that the cumulative pressures from human activities do not cause unacceptable, permanent harm to the ecosystem is challenging but crucial for sustainable management of these regions. Linkage frameworks and ecological risk assessments have proven to be useful tools for holistic evaluations of cumulative human pressures as a guide to managers and policy makers for prioritization of risk factors. Here, we present the first holistic assessment of ecosystem risk from human activities along the Norwegian coast. Pressures from coastal sectors are identified and weighted by the exposure to and potential impact on ecosystem components following the ODEMM (Options for Delivering Ecosystem-based Marine Management) framework. We focus on four coastal regions with contrasting scales of human activities. Two southern regions with multiple anthropogenic activities are associated with higher cumulative risk of negative impacts compared to northern areas where less extensive activities have a lower potential of harming the coastal ecosystems. Despite latitudinal differences in human use of the coastline, the pressures and ecosystem components associated with the greatest risk of cumulative impacts are relatively similar between the regions. Contaminants and underwater noise stand out as high-risk pressures, associated with multiple sectors with a high spatiotemporal footprint and with the potential to negatively impact a range of ecosystem components. Nevertheless, a confidence assessment also highlights the need for more in-depth analysis on the input, spread and effect of these pressures on coastal ecosystems. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of the risk assessment framework and suggest new directions which may enhance the utility and uptake of such assessments for sustainable management of coastal ecosystems.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the brazilian version of physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities (PASIPD) in people with lower limb amputation

ObjectiveTo perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) for the Brazilian Portuguese in a sample of people with lower limb amputation. MethodsThis is a methodological study with cross-sectional design. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the scale were initially carried out in accordance with international guidelines. After its psychometric properties were evaluated, in addition to the presence of floor and ceiling effect, the standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change. ResultsThe Brazilian version of PASIPD presented face and content validity and correlated significantly with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (rs: 0.71/p = 0.001). The degree of inter-examiner agreement ranged from 0.29 to 0.75, and the intra-examiner from 0.13 to 0.72. The inter-examiner was 0.71, and the intra-examiner was 0.78. The internal consistency measure (Cronbach's α) was 0.75. No floor or ceiling effect were observed. The standard error of measurement was 0.36 and the minimal detectable change was 1.66. ConclusionsThe Brazilian version of PASIPD is valid, reliable and has internal consistency among its items, and can be used by researchers and health professionals to evaluate the physical activity of Brazilians with lower limb amputation.