The time dimension is always embedded in any human experience and is an inseparable part of it. According to scalar timing theory, timing behavior is based on the output of an internal clock that provides long-term memory representations that can be retrieved and compared with the representation of the current temporal interval held in short-term memory. More precisely, the model includes a pacemaker, a switch, and an accumulator. At the onset of a timed stimulus, the switch closes, thereby allowing pulses emitted by the pacemaker to enter the accumulator. At the offset of the stimulus, the switch opens and pulse transfer terminates. Thus, representation of stimulus duration depends on the number of pulses accumulated during the stimulus presentation. According to the model, a temporal judgment results from a comparison, via the decision mechanism, of this representation of stimulus duration with longer-term representations of biologically significant durations experienced previously. However, the relevance and importance of time is not constant but varies depending on the meaning assigned to a certain situation. The present study investigated how symbolic meaning affectes time perception in school children and adults. In particular, we investigated how children experience time and how the environment acts on children subjective experience of time. Stimuli with different symbolic meaning are be employed (the meaning of fastness or slowness). In the present study we employed two stimuli, one that recalls the meaning of fastness (motorbike) and one that recalls the meaning of slowness (bicycle). We predicted that observing a stimulus that recall the meaning of speed affect participant's performance in the way that stimuli that recall the meaning of fastness will be under-reproduced and stimuli that recall the meaning of slowness will be over- reproduced. Two experiments are presented. Experiment 1 included two hundred participants divided in 9 different groups according to their school class: 5 groups belonged to primary school, 3 groups were middle school, and 1 group was of university students. Participants were engaged in a time reproduction task in which a motorbike or a bicycle were presented for 11, 21, and 36 s. After the presentation of the standard duration, participants were required to press the space bar to reproduce the duration previously presented. Significant differences between groups were found. Younger participants under-reproduced the duration more than did older participants. Importantly, an effect of symbolic meaning was found in youngre participants (up to 8 years old) older participants did not present any effect of symbolic meaning. We reasoned that the time reproduction task might not be the appropriate method to investigate time perception in older participants in particular when longer durations are employed. Experiment 2 included twenty university students. The visual stimuli were four pictures representing a bicycle and a motorbike and a bicycle and a motorbike driven by a person. Participants were engaged in a time bisection task: standard short 400ms and the standard long was 1600ms. Each standard duration was presented 10 times. After the training phase participants were required to perform 4 blocks. In each block, the four pictures were presented 7 times for each of the comparison durations (400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600ms; total 196 trials in each block). The participants were asked to respond with their left and right index finger and response keys were counterbalanced between participants. The cumulative normal function was fitted to the resulting curves. We calculated the temporal bisection point as index of perceived duration; the observed shift of the bisection point for the different vehicles presented can be interrelated as an indicator of differences in perceiving duration. Thus, longer perceived durations are reflected by smaller bisection points values. Results confirmed and extended previous findings observed with younger participants. When the stimulus presented recalled the meaning of fastness, temporal intervals were under- estimated, whereas, when the stimulus presented recalled the meaning of slowness, temporal intervals were over-estimated. The present study also pointed out the importance of selecting the appropriate method to investigate time perception.
Read full abstract