Saxagliptin Group Research Articles

Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BackgroundThe cardiovascular safety and efficacy of many current antihyperglycemic agents, including saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, are unclear.MethodsWe randomly assigned 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events to receive saxagliptin or placebo and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Physicians were permitted to adjust other medications, including antihyperglycemic agents. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.ResultsA primary end-point event occurred in 613 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 609 patients in the placebo group (7.3% and 7.2%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan–Meier estimates; hazard ratio with saxagliptin, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.12; P=0.99 for superiority; P<0.001 for noninferiority); the results were similar in the “on-treatment” analysis (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.17). The major secondary end point of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or heart failure occurred in 1059 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 1034 patients in the placebo group (12.8% and 12.4%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan–Meier estimates; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.11; P=0.66). More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure (3.5% vs. 2.8%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51; P=0.007). Rates of adjudicated cases of acute and chronic pancreatitis were similar in the two groups (acute pancreatitis, 0.3% in the saxagliptin group and 0.2% in the placebo group; chronic pancreatitis, <0.1% and 0.1% in the two groups, respectively).ConclusionsDPP-4 inhibition with saxagliptin did not increase or decrease the rate of ischemic events, though the rate of hospitalization for heart failure was increased. Although saxagliptin improves glycemic control, other approaches are necessary to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; SAVOR-TIMI 53 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01107886.)

Saxagliptin Add-on Therapy to Insulin With or Without Metformin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: 52-Week Safety and Efficacy

Achievement of glycemic control is an important objective in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin versus placebo as add-on therapy in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin alone or insulin plus metformin. This was a long-term (28-week) extension of a short-term (24-week), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of saxagliptin 5 mg once daily versus placebo as add-on therapy to open-label insulin or insulin plus metformin therapy totaling 52 weeks of treatment. In contrast with the goal of maintaining a stable insulin dosage during the short-term phase, during the extension phase the insulin dosage was flexible and adjusted as deemed appropriate by the investigator. The study was conducted in a clinical practice setting, including family practice and hospital sites. Patients with T2DM aged 18-78 years with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.5-11 % on a stable insulin regimen (30-150 U/day with or without metformin) for ≥8 weeks at screening were included in the study. Patients were stratified by metformin use and randomly assigned 2:1 to oral saxagliptin 5 mg (n = 304) or placebo (n = 151) once daily. All patients who completed the initial 24 weeks of treatment were eligible to participate in the 28-week extension, regardless of whether they had required rescue treatment. The main outcome measure was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52. In general, the outcomes achieved at week 24 were sustained to week 52. Adjusted mean change from baseline HbA1c at week 52 was greater with saxagliptin (-0.75 %) versus placebo (-0.38 %); the adjusted between-group difference was -0.37 % (95 % CI -0.55 to -0.19); between-group differences were similar in patients treated with metformin (-0.37 % [95 % CI -0.59 to -0.15]) and without metformin (-0.37 % [95 % CI -0.69 to -0.04]). At week 52, a greater proportion of patients receiving saxagliptin achieved HbA1c <7 % than those receiving placebo (21.3 vs. 8.7 %; between-group difference 12.6 % [95 % CI 6.1-19.1]). The increase from baseline in mean total daily insulin dose at week 52 was numerically smaller with saxagliptin (5.67 vs 6.67 U with placebo; difference, -1.01 U [95 % CI -3.24 to 1.22]). During the 52-week study period, the proportion of patients reporting ≥1 adverse event (AE) was 66.4 % with saxagliptin and 71.5 % with placebo, the majority being mild or moderate in intensity. The most common AEs (≥5 % with saxagliptin or placebo) were urinary tract infection, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, influenza, and pain in extremity; the incidence of each AE was similar between treatment groups. In the saxagliptin and placebo groups, the incidence of reported hypoglycemia was 22.7 and 26.5 %, respectively; the incidence of confirmed hypoglycemia (fingerstick glucose ≤50 mg/dL [≤2.77 mmol/L] with characteristic symptoms) was 7.6 and 6.6 %, respectively. Adjusted mean change from baseline body weight was +0.8 kg with saxagliptin and +0.5 kg with placebo. Saxagliptin 5 mg once daily as add-on to insulin, with or without concomitant metformin, produced a durable improvement in glycemic control and was well tolerated over 52 weeks of treatment.

The Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Haemodialysis Patients

Introduction: Good glycaemic control without causing excessive hypoglycaemia reduced the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 DM patients on regular haemodialysis (HD). The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of add-on saxagliptin to insulin therapy in blood sugar control compared to insulin therapy alone in diabetic patients undergoing HD. Design and Methods: In this prospective open-labelled randomized controlled trial, HD patients with type 2 DM and on stable insulin therapy with HbA1c 7% - 13% were randomized to receive add-on saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily to insulin therapy or insulin therapy only for 12 weeks. Results: 24 patients were randomized into each arm equally. Baseline and week-12 serum HbA1c, fructosamine, fasting blood glucose (FBS) and mean self monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) were comparable in the groups. Reduction of HbA1c and mean SMBG were significant in both groups. There was a significant drop in fructosamine levels (p = 0.004) and trend of lower FBS (p = 0.097) in add-on saxagliptin group but not in insulin alone group. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was the same in both groups. Conclusion: Add-on saxagliptin to insulin is comparable to insulin therapy alone in blood sugar control in regular HD patients and is safe and generally well tolerated. Add-on saxagliptin group may have more persistent and less fluctuation of glucose control compared to insulin only group.

The efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of saxagliptin monotherapy for up to 76 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control, with main efficacy assessment at 24 weeks.Methods365 treatment-naïve patients with T2DM (HbA1c 7.0%–10.0%) were treated with saxagliptin 2.5 mg q.A.M., saxagliptin 2.5 mg q.A.M. with possible titration to saxagliptin 5 mg, saxagliptin 5 mg q.A.M., saxagliptin 5 mg q.P.M., or placebo. After week 24, patients in all groups were eligible for titration to saxagliptin 10 mg based on HbA1c ≥7%, and all unrescued placebo patients began blinded metformin 500 mg/day. Rescue with open-label metformin was available for patients with inadequate glycemic control.ResultsAt week 24, placebo-subtracted mean HbA1c reduction from baseline (LOCF) was significantly greater in the saxagliptin treatment groups vs placebo, and remained greater through week 76. Serious adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs were similar in saxagliptin and control groups; incidence of confirmed hypoglycemia was low across all treatment groups (saxagliptin-treated, 2 [0.7]; control, 1 [1.4]).ConclusionsIn treatment-naïve patients with T2DM, saxagliptin monotherapy demonstrated statistically significant improvement in HbA1c compared with placebo at 24 weeks and was generally well tolerated for up to 76 weeks.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00316082

Effect of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin alone or insulin combined with metformin

Objective:To evaluate efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with inadequate glycemic control on insulin alone or combined with metformin.Methods:Adults (n = 455) with HbA1c 7.5–11% on stable insulin therapy (30–150 U/day ± metformin) for at least 8 weeks were stratified by metformin use and randomly assigned 2:1 to receive saxagliptin 5 mg or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. Patients were to maintain stable insulin doses but these could be decreased to reduce risk of hypoglycemia. Patients with hyperglycemia or substantially increased insulin use were rescued with a flexible insulin regimen and remained in the study. Metformin doses were kept stable. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 (or rescue).Results:Patients treated with saxagliptin versus placebo had significantly greater reductions in adjusted mean HbA1c (difference: −0.41%, p < 0.0001), postprandial glucose (PPG) 180-minute area under the curve (−3829.8 mg·min/dL, p = 0.0011), and 120-minute PPG (−23.0 mg/dL, p = 0.0016) at 24 weeks. Treatment with saxagliptin resulted in similar reductions in HBA1c relative to placebo, irrespective of metformin treatment. At 24 weeks, difference in adjusted mean fasting plasma glucose for saxagliptin versus placebo was −4.02 mg/dL (p = 0.3958); 17.3% and 6.7% of patients in the saxagliptin and placebo groups, respectively, achieved HbA1c < 7%. Mean change from baseline in body weight at week 24 was 0.39 kg for saxagliptin and 0.18 kg for placebo. Hypoglycemia was reported in 18.4% and 19.9% of patients in the saxagliptin and placebo groups, respectively (confirmed hypoglycemia: 5.3%, 3.3%). Other adverse events reported in at least 5% of patients were urinary tract infection (saxagliptin, placebo: 5.9%, 6.0%), influenza (3.0%, 6.6%), and pain in extremity (1.6%, 6.0%).Conclusions:Saxagliptin 5-mg once-daily add-on therapy improves glycemic control in T2D patients on insulin alone or combined with metformin and is generally well-tolerated.NCT00757588

Long-term treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment: a randomised controlled 52-week efficacy and safety study

Therapeutic options are limited for diabetes patients with renal disease. This report presents 52-week results from a study assessing the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment. Double-blind study in patients stratified by baseline renal impairment (moderate, severe or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] on haemodialysis) randomised to saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily or placebo added to other antidiabetic drugs in use at baseline, including insulin. A total of 170 adults with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) 7-11% and creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min or ESRD were randomised and treated. Absolute changes in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 52 were evaluated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with last observation carried forward. Repeated-measures analyses were also performed. Adjusted mean decrease in HbA(1c) was greater with saxagliptin than placebo (difference, -0.73%, p < 0.001 [ANCOVA]). Reductions in adjusted mean HbA(1c) were numerically greater with saxagliptin than placebo in patients with renal impairment rated as moderate (-0.94% vs. 0.19% respectively) or severe (-0.81% vs. -0.49%), but similar to placebo for those with ESRD (-1.13% vs. -0.99%). Reductions in adjusted mean FPG were numerically greater with saxagliptin in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated; similar proportions of patients in the saxagliptin and placebo groups reported hypoglycaemic events (28% and 29% respectively). Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily offers sustained efficacy and good tolerability for patients with T2DM and renal impairment.

Saxagliptin improves glycaemic control and is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin vs. placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment. In this multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7-11% and creatinine clearance <50 ml/min were stratified by baseline renal impairment (moderate, severe or end-stage on haemodialysis), and randomized (1 : 1) to saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Oral antihyperglycaemic drugs and insulin therapy present at enrolment were continued throughout the study. The absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12 (primary efficacy end-point) was analysed using an analysis of covariance model with last observation carried forward methodology. A total of 170 patients were randomized and treated. The adjusted mean decrease from baseline to week 12 in HbA1c was statistically significantly greater in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group; the difference between treatments was -0.42% (95% confidence interval: -0.71 to -0.12%, p = 0.007). Adjusted mean HbA1c decreases from baseline to week 12 were numerically greater with saxagliptin than with placebo in the subgroups of patients with moderate (-0.64 vs. -0.05%) and severe (-0.95 vs. -0.50%) renal impairment. HbA1c reductions were similar between saxagliptin and placebo in the subgroup with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis (-0.84 vs. -0.87%). Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated; incidences of adverse events and hypoglycaemic events were similar to placebo. Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and renal impairment.