The availability of conventional linear mineral phosphorus (P) fertilization will become lower as phosphate rock stocks are limited and strongly concentrated in a few locations. Therefore, we need to increase agronomic P use efficiency and find alternative, recycled, sources of P. Two possible solutions mentioned in the literature are (i) using struvite, a mineral circular P fertilizer; and (ii) making use of earthworm activity, which has been shown to increase P availability. Here, we study the interaction between these two approaches, with the hypothesis that earthworms could increase the P availability from the poorly soluble struvite. We set up a field-based mesocosm experiment in a sandy soil with a low agronomic P status with 13 different treatments combining three earthworms species (Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister, Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny and A. longa Ude alone or in a threes species mixture), different P fertilizers (no P, Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) and struvite). The experiment lasted 13 months (five fertilisation-harvest cycles). We found that, in field conditions, the yield and P uptake of Lolium perenne did not differ between fertilization with struvite or TSP. Earthworms only played a minor role in explaining ryegrass P uptake compared to fertilisation. We did not see either positive nor negative interactions between earthworms and struvite, meaning that earthworms did not further increase the P availability from struvite. The equal performances of struvite and TSP are explained by an enhanced effort from plants to actively take up P through a modification of root traits. This includes increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation and the production of finer and longer roots. Our results show that struvite performs comparably to TSP under realistic field conditions, making it a viable alternative to phosphate rock-based fertilizers.
Read full abstract