Microplate readers are widely considered as designed and intended for high-throughput (HT) applications such as drug discovery, whereas “research-grade” (RG) fluorescence spectrometers are the tools of choice when quality and diversity of data are the prime considerations. However, a definite trend of the past decade is the commercial availability of microplate readers that come equipped with emission and excitation monochromators (even double monochromators) very similar to those found on research-grade spectrometers. The flashlamp sources used in most microplate readers are very similar or even identical in design to the flashlamp sources of the research-grade spectrometers. Microplate readers that employ fluorescence lifetime as a primary readout represent another possible form of convergence between the high-throughput assay and research. An interesting question is to what degree the biggest difference between these two worlds is now simply the sample format, i.e., cuvette vs. microplate. It seems reasonable to assume that the cuvette with its straightforward implementation of right angle excitation-emission geometry offers significant advantages over the epi-illumination geometry and uncontained sample imposed by a microplate when it comes to data quality. We have implemented a prototype microplate reader equipped with a variety of pulsed laser sources for measurement of fluorescence spectra, fluorescence lifetimes, and anisotropy. The subject of this poster is benchmarking its performance relative to cuvette format. The plate reader employs direct waveform recording as an alternative to TCSPC; studies to compare the speed, accuracy, and precision of the two lifetime approaches are presented along with several examples of titration curves for rapid determination of binding affinities via time-resolved FRET.
Read full abstract