Same-day Discharge Research Articles

Safety and cost of performing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with same day discharge at a large academic hospital.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common surgical treatment for morbid obesity. While certain specialized ambulatory surgery centers offer LSG on an outpatient basis, patients undergoing LSG at most academic centers are admitted to hospital for initial postoperative convalescence and monitoring. Our institution has begun to offer LSG with same-day discharge (SDD) in select patients. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and costs for patients undergoing LSG with inpatient admission versus SDD. All patients enrolled in the SDD program from December 2020 through July 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients enrolled in this pathway were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis even if ultimately admitted postoperatively. Propensity scoring was used to match these patients 1:1 to those with planned inpatient recovery based on age, BMI, and ASA classification. Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the LSG with SDD program during the study period. Among these, 62 patients (82.7%) had successful immediate postoperative discharge. Reasons for cancelation of planned SDD included anxiety (n = 5), pain (n = 3), nausea (n = 2), and one patient each with hypotension, urinary retention, and bleeding. After matching, there were no differences in age, BMI, or ASA classification in a comparison group of patients with planned inpatient recovery. There were no differences in perioperative complications. There were no readmissions or requirements for outpatient intravenous fluids among patients with SDD, compared to n = 3 (4.0%) and n = 2 (2.7%) in the inpatient cohort, respectively. The total perioperative cost for patients undergoing LSG with planned SDD was 6.8% less than those with inpatient recovery. With appropriate protocols, LSG with same-day discharge can safely be performed at large academic surgery centers without increased morbidity or need for additional services in the perioperative period. SDD may be associated with decreased costs and allows for more efficient hospital bed allocation.

Preoperative Bladder Scanning Can Predict Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) moves to the outpatient setting, it is becoming clear that postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a potential impediment to same-day discharge. Although risk factors for POUR have been widely studied, the lack of their clinical utility warrants investigation of specific preoperative factors that can assist in surgical planning and patient optimization. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether preoperative symptom surveys and bladder scanning are useful tools in identifying POUR risk. We performed a prospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a high-volume orthopaedic hospital between December 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. A total of 507 patients (324 female and 183 male) undergoing TJA completed the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index preoperatively and then again at 14 and 64 days postoperatively. Post-void bladder scans were obtained in the immediate preoperative setting. POUR was defined as a bladder volume of >500 mL that required catheterization. Chi-square and quintile analysis were used to compare bladder scanning volumes, and Student t tests were used to compare AUA scores. The rate of POUR was 37% (66 female and 34 male) and 23% (37 female and 19 male) in the TKA and THA groups, respectively. Increasing post-void residual volume (PVRV) measured on preoperative bladder scanning was found to be predictive of POUR. Among the TKA cohort, younger age and lower body mass index were also associated with increased catheterization, although age was not statistically significant. The AUA symptom survey was not found to correlate with POUR in either population. There was a predictable and exponential increase in the rate of catheterization as preoperative PVRV increased from 50 to 200 mL. The AUA symptom score showed no utility in predicting POUR in our study population. We propose that preoperative bladder ultrasonography become standard practice in TJA, especially among patients scheduled for same-day discharge. Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Same day discharge colon surgery: is it financially worth it?

Same day discharge (SDD) for colorectal surgery shows increasing promise in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive surgery. It has become increasingly relevant due to the constraints posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to compare SDD and postoperative day 1 (POD1) discharge to understand the clinical outcomes and financial impact on factors such as cost, charge, revenue, contribution margin and readmission. A retrospective review of colectomies was performed at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 143). Two populations were identified: SDD (n = 51) and POD1 (n = 92). Patients were selected by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) and Diagnosis Related Grouper (DRG) codes. There was a statistically significant difference favouring SDD in total hospital cost (p < 0.0001), average direct costs (p < 0.0001) and average charges (p < 0.0016). SDD average hospital costs were $8699 (values in USD throughout) compared with $11 652 for POD 1 (p < 0.0001), and average SDD hospital charges were $85 506 compared with $97 008 for POD1 (p < 0.0016). The net revenue for SDD was $22 319 while for POD1 it was $26 173 (p = 0.14). Upon comparison of contribution margins (SDD $13 620 vs. POD1 $14 522), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). There were no identified statistically significant differences in operating room time, robotic console time, readmission rates or surgical complications. Amidst the pandemic-related constraints, we found that SDD was associated with lower hospital costs and comparable contribution margins compared with POD1. Additionally, the study was unable to identify any significant difference between operating time, readmissions, and surgical complications when performing SDD.

A Prospective Multicenter Standard of Care Study of Outpatient Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

A global shift is occurring as hospital procedures move to ambulatory surgical settings. Surgeons have performed outpatient sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in bariatric surgery since 2010. However, prospective trials are needed to ensure its safety before widespread adoption.PurposeThe study aimed to present a comprehensive report on the prospective data collection of 30-day outcomes of outpatient primary laparoscopic SG (LSG). This trial seeks to assess whether outpatient LSG is non-inferior to hospital-based surgery in selected patients who meet the outpatient surgery criteria set by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Materials and MethodsThis study is funded by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and has been approved by the Advarra Institutional Review Board (Pro00055990). Cognizant of the necessity for a prospective approach, data collection commenced after patients underwent primary LSG procedures, spanning from August 2021 to September 2022, at six medical centers across the USA. Data centralization was facilitated through ArborMetrix. Each center has its own enhanced recovery protocols, and no attempt was made to standardize the protocols.ResultsThe analysis included 365 patients with a mean preoperative BMI of 43.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Rates for 30-day complications, reoperations, readmissions, emergency department visits, and urgent care visits were low: 1.6%, .5%, .2%, .2%, and 0%, respectively. Two patients (0.5%) experienced grade IIIb complications. There were no mortalities or leaks reported.ConclusionThe prospective cohort study suggests that same-day discharge following LSG seems safe in highly selected patients at experienced US centers.Graphical

Effect of Gabapentin on Sedation and Same-Day Discharge in Gynecologic Laparoscopy

Effect of Gabapentin on Sedation and Same-Day Discharge in Gynecologic Laparoscopy

Rethinking postoperative care: same-day ileostomy closure discharge improves patient outcomes

BackgroundThe evolution of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) in colon and rectal surgery has led to the development of same-day discharge (SDD) procedures for selected patients. Early discharge following diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure was first described in 2003. However, its widespread adoption remains limited, with SDD accounting for only 3.2% of all DLI closures in 2005-2006, according to ACS-NSQIP database, and rising to just 4.1% by 2016. Aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of SDD DLI closure with those of DLI closure following the standard ERP. MethodsA retrospective case-matched study compared 125 patients undergoing SDD DLI closure to 250 patients undergoing DLI closure following the standard ERP based on age (± 1 year), sex, ASA score, BMI, surgery date (± 2 months), underlying disease, and hospital site. The primary outcome was comparative 30-day complication rates. ResultsPatients in the traditional ERP group received more intraoperative fluids (1221.1 ± 416.6 vs. 1039.0 ± 368.3ml, P<0.001) but had similar estimated blood loss. Ten patients (8%) in the SDD-ERP group failed same-day discharge. The 30-day postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the SDD group (14.8%) compared to the standard ERP group (25.7%, P=0.025). This difference was primarily driven by a lower incidence of ileus in the SDD group (9.6% vs. 14.8%, P=0.034). There were no significant differences in readmission rate (9.6% of SDD-ERP vs. 9.2% of standard ERP, P=0.900) and re-operation rates (3.2% of SDD-ERP vs. 2.4% of standard ERP, P=0.650). ConclusionSDD ileostomy closure is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure associated with fewer complications than the present study's standard ERP. This could represent a new standard of care. Further prospective trials are required to confirm the findings of this study. Data availability statementData supporting the research are available upon request to protect the privacy of study participants.

Impact of superior hypogastric nerve block during uterine fibroid embolisation on pain scores, opioid requirements, and same-day discharge: a case–control study

To assess the safety and efficacy of superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) in managing periprocedural pain associated with uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) and in facilitating same-day discharge. Prospectively enrolled case-control study with retrospective analysis comprising 119 eligible patients who underwent UFE for symptomatic fibroids was undertaken at a UK teaching hospital between January 2016 and September 2022. SHNB was administered to 62 participants in addition to systemic analgesia; 57 participants received systemic analgesia alone. SHNB was performed mid-UFE using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine. Pain scores were assessed using an 11-point (0-10) verbal numerical rating scale (NRS). The study received research and ethics committee approval. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square and independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value of <0.05 defined significance. Participants who received SHNB experienced significantly less pain during the first 6 h post-procedure (averaged median pain score 2.6 versus 3.8, p=0.031). SHNB reduced the proportion of participants requiring post-procedural anti-emetics (45% versus 63%, p<0.05). For participants entered on the day-case pathway (SHNB=34, no-SHNB=16), those who received SHNB had a higher rate of successful same-day discharge (62% versus 31%, p=0.044). This SHNB group required significantly less opioids for periprocedural pain relief (median oral morphine equivalents; 44 mg versus 80 mg, p=0.020). No SHNB-related adverse events occurred. SHNB is safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain, opioid requirements, and anti-emetic use in patients undergoing UFE for symptomatic fibroids. SHNB, as an adjunct to analgesic optimisation, facilitates same-day discharge, which is often limited by severe post-embolisation pain.

Unplanned Return to Hospital After Same Day Oral Cavity Resection: A Dual Institution Study.

Primary objective: describe rates of 30-days unplanned readmission following outpatient resection of oral cavity cancer. Secondary objective: evaluate for patient and treatment factors associated with readmission. Retrospective, dual-institution cohort study of 2 tertiary care referral centers involving adult patients undergoing resection of oral cavity cancer with plans for same-day discharge. Consecutive sample of 77 patients included. Primary outcome was unplanned readmission to emergency room or inpatient stay in the 30 days following surgery. Comparison testing was used between return and non-return groups. Among 77 patients treated with outpatient surgery for oral cavity cancer, 19 (25%) returned to the hospital within 30 days. Among the reasons for return, 16 (80%) were directly related to surgery, and 4 (20%) were related to perioperative medical complications not directly related to a surgical site. Among the 25 patients also undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy with their oral cavity resection, none returned to the hospital for neck-related complications. While most patients could be safely observed and discharged after return to the hospital, 8 patients (10%) required inpatient readmission. No significant differences between return and non-return groups were identified, although there was a trend toward shorter driving distance from hospital for the return group (47.6 miles vs. 69.5 miles, P = 0.097). Unplanned return to the hospital following outpatient oral cavity resection is prevalent and primarily driven by postoperative primary resection site concerns. Among patients selected for same day discharge, no definite population at highest risk of unplanned return was identified.

Feasibility of same-day discharge of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.

Prostate cancer is one of the most common oncologic diseases. Outpatient robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has gained popularity due to its ability to minimize patient costs while maintaining low complication rates. Few studies have analyzed the possibility of performing outpatient RALP specifically in patients undergoing concurrent pelvic lymph node dissections (PLND). Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP), we identified total number of RALP, stratified into inpatient and outpatient groups including those with and without PLND from 2016 to 2021. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and unplanned readmission rates were summarized. Proportions of outpatient procedures were calculated to assess adoption of outpatient protocol. Between 2016 and 2021, a total of 58,527 RALP were performed, 3.7% (2142) outpatient and 96.3% inpatient. Altogether, patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have hypertension (52.6% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have sepsis or urinary tract infections (3.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.04) when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. Cardiopulmonary, renal, thromboembolic complications, and 30-day events such as unplanned readmission, reoperation rates, and mortality were similar in both groups. However, among multivariate analysis regarding 30-day readmission and complications, there were no significant differences between outpatient RALP with or without PLND. Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have baseline hypertension and higher rates of postoperative infection, when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. No significant differences were seen regarding 30-day readmission or complications on multivariate analysis.

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese)

BackgroundNearly 65% of patients with endometrial cancer who undergo primary hysterectomy have concurrent obesity. Retrospective data show advantages in using robotic surgery in these patients compared with conventional laparoscopy, namely...

Quality indicators for ambulatory colectomy: literature search and expert consensus

BackgroundCare for patients undergoing elective colectomy has become increasingly standardized using Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP). ERP, encorporating minimally invasive surgery (MIS), decreased postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, disruptive changes are needed to safely introduce colectomy in an ambulatory or same-day discharge (SDD) setting. Few research groups showed the feasibility of ambulatory colectomy. So far, no minimum standards for the quality of care of this procedure have been defined. This study aims to identify quality indicators (QIs) that assess the quality of care for ambulatory colectomy.MethodsA literature search was performed to identify recommendations for ambulatory colectomy. Based on that search, a set of QIs was identified and categorized into seven domains: preparation of the patient (pre-admission), anesthesia, surgery, in-hospital monitoring, home monitoring, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. This list was presented to a panel of international experts (surgeons and anesthesiologists) in a 1 round Delphi to assess the relevance of the proposed indicators.ResultsBased on the literature search (2010–2021), 3841 results were screened on title and abstract for relevant information. Nine papers were withheld to identify the first set of QIs (n = 155). After excluding duplicates and outdated QIs, this longlist was narrowed down to 88 indicators. Afterward, consensus was reached in a 1 round Delphi on a final list of 32 QIs, aiming to be a comprehensive set to evaluate the quality of ambulatory colectomy care.ConclusionWe propose a list of 32 QI to guide and evaluate the implementation of ambulatory colectomy.

Can an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Result in a Safe and Effective Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundOutpatient total knee arthroplasty (OP TKA) is found to benefit patients as well as the health care system. Studies on OP TKA have been limited to unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can result in performing simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA) safely and effectively in the OP setting. MethodsThis retrospective study compared patients who underwent SBTKA in an OP setting (OP group, n = 100) using an ERAS protocol from April 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, and a propensity-matched historical group (inpatient group, n = 100) operated in an inpatient setting via conventional protocol from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. The complication rate, readmission rate, visual analog score (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and Knee Society Score (KSS) were compared between the groups in the early postoperative and follow-up periods up to 1 year. ResultsWe found a comparable complication rate (4 versus 7%, P = .4) and readmission rate (2 versus 3%, P = .7). The VAS score was significantly lower in the OP group on day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 14 postsurgery (P < .001). The KSS and ROM were significantly better in the OP group after 14 days (P < .001). The VAS, KSS, and ROM were comparable between the groups at 1 month and later follow-up periods (P > .05). ConclusionsAn ERAS protocol in SBTKA patients resulted in safe same-day discharge with better early functional outcomes compared with conventional practices. The results from similar future studies can alleviate surgeon and patient concerns about OP TKA.

Same-day discharge after elective percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.

Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increasingly performed in specific patients with cryptogenic stroke or clinical evidence of a paradoxical embolism. This study was performed to determine the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following such procedures. This is a prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective percutaneous PFO closure in a single tertiary center in Portugal between January 2020 and July 2023. AmplatzerTM devices (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and NobblestichTM EL (HeartStitch, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, USA) were used. After 6 months, the following events were looked at: post-procedural paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, unplanned cardiac re-hospitalization, urgent cardiac surgery, major vascular complications, pericardial effusions, device embolization, and death. We studied 122 consecutive patients (52% female, 68; 48±12 years old) who had elective percutaneous closure with success and no complications. Forty-nine (40%) had SDD. AmplatzerTM devices were used more frequently in the SDD group, while NobblestichTM EL was more common in the overnight group. During the overnight group's follow-up period, there was one non-cardiovascular death; there were no further events. SDD after elective percutaneous closure of PFO was shown to be a safe and successful patient management method, including NobblestichTM, which we describe for the first time. Our results prove the safety of this same-day discharge strategy. We hypothesize that in the near future, in selected cases, PFO closure might become an ambulatory procedure.

Pushing Backwards: Evaluating Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment of Intestinal Intussusception.

Intestinal intussusception (II) is a common cause for acute abdomen in children, occurring in 0.33 to 0.71 per 1000 children per year. Early diagnosis and treatment are fundamental for prevention of irreversible intestinal damage. The first line of treatment is conservative, with saline reduction enema or air reduction enema. Our goal is to evaluate results with conservative treatment of II in children. A retrospective single-center review of all patients with diagnosis of II from January 2014 to December 2019 was performed. Demographics, clinical data, treatment option, and results were assessed. Thirty-eight cases were identified. The mean age was 26 months, and 68% were males. Most presented with abdominal pain (95%) and vomiting (66%), after an average of 30 hours. Rectal bleeding was present in 32% of patients. Abdominal ultrasound was performed in all patients for diagnosis. Conservative treatment was first option in 95% of patients, with a global effectiveness of 83% after 1 attempt. Saline reduction enema was more effective than air reduction enema (88% vs 70%), and patients with successful reduction were younger (24 vs 33 months), but neither reached statistical significance. Two patients had a subsequent II episode within 1 week after hospital discharge. Neither age, sex, symptoms and respective duration, rotavirus inoculation, intussuscepted bowel length, nor technique used was predictive of treatment failure or II relapse. Conservative treatment in II is a safe and effective option, preventing invasive surgical procedures. Effectiveness of such treatments may be as high as 88% after 1 attempt, with rapid diet reintroduction. Same-day discharge after oral feeding toleration is safe.

Improving the Rate of Same-Day Discharge in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery—An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative

SettingSame-day discharge (SDD) in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic oncology (GO) surgery is a recent trend aligned with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles. SDD in GO is safe and feasible based on several recent studies, including a quality improvement (QI) initiative in Edmonton, Alberta, which resulted in SDD rates >70%. PatientsA baseline audit of GO patients at our center (Calgary, Alberta) found the SDD rate to be 14%. Given that Edmonton and our center are within the same province, they have similar patient populations and available resources – suggesting that interventions from the Edmonton QI initiative may be translatable. ObjectivesThe objectives of our QI initiative were: 1) to increase the rate of SDD in eligible GO patients to 70%, and 2) to evaluate the ease with which QI methods demonstrated in one study could be applied at another center. DesignA pre/post-intervention design was used (50 patients/group). InterventionsFour interventions were designed to address root causes for failed SDD identified following QI diagnostics: 1) SDD as the default discharge plan, including a “Day Surgery” surgical booking, 2 & 3) development and implementation of ERAS SDD pre-operative and post-operative order sets, and 4) patient education SDD-specific documents. MeasurementsRate of SDD was measured together with patient demographics and surgical outcomes. Process and balancing measures were defined and tracked. Main ResultsSDD in GO increased from 14% (7/50) to 82% (41/50) after the implementation of the above interventions (OR 28, p<0.0001, 95%CI 9.54-82.11). Improved SDD was achieved without negatively impacting post-operative rates of emergency department visits: 8% pre-, 4% post-intervention within 7 days (OR 0.48, p=0.678, 95%CI 0.09-2.74), 12% pre-, 10% post-intervention within 30 days (OR 0.8148, p=1.0, 95% CI 0.2317-2.86). ConclusionsThis ERAS QI initiative resulted in a substantial increase in SDD in GO, without a negative impact on balancing measures. We demonstrate that the “spread” of simple, clearly defined QI interventions across centers (where the patient population is similar) is feasible. This suggests that an ERAS SDD Program for GO could be a realistic goal for other centers with similar characteristics.

Sleep Apnea is Not an Obstacle for Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundUp to 25% of patients requiring hip or knee arthroplasty have sleep apnea (SA), and these patients have historically been excluded from outpatient programs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate same-day discharge failure as well as 30-day complications, readmissions, and unexpected visits. MethodsA retrospective case-control study comparing patients who have and do not have SA matched for age, sex and arthroplasty type (total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, unicompartimental knee arthroplasty) who underwent primary outpatient surgery between February 2019 and December 2022 in 2 academic hospitals was conducted. Cases with mild SA, moderate SA with a body mass index (BMI) <35, and SA of all severity treated by continuous positive airway pressure machines were eligible. There were 156 patients included (78 cases). Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index. Continuous variables were evaluated by Student's T or Mann-Whitney tests, while categorical data were analyzed by Chi-square or Fisher tests. Univariate analyses were performed to determine discharge failure risk factors. ResultsThere were 6 cases (7.7%) and 5 controls (6.4%) who failed to be discharged on surgery day (P = .754), with postoperative hypoxemia (6, [3.8%]) and apnea periods (3, [1.9%]) being the most common causes. Higher BMI (odds ratio = 1.19, P = .013) and general anesthesia (odds ratio = 11.97, P = .004) were found to be risk factors for discharge failure. No difference was observed on 30-day readmissions (P = .497), unexpected visits (P = 1.000), and complications on the Clavien-Dindo Classification (P > .269) and Comprehensive Complication Index (P > .334) scales. ConclusionsSelected patients who have SA can safely undergo outpatient hip or knee arthroplasty. Higher BMI and general anesthesia increased the odds of same-day discharge failure. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Case-control Study.

Patient's Preference for Same-Day Discharge or Hospitalization After Bariatric Surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery protocols have proven to be effective in reducing complication rates and length of stay. Guidelines do not include a recommendation on the length of hospital stay whereas same-day discharge is currently widely investigated on safety and feasibility. However, none of these studies takes patient preferences into account. The study aimed to reveal the patient's preference for outpatient surgery (OS) in patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery. A single-center preference-based randomized trial was performed between March and December of 2021. Adult patients planned for primary bariatric surgery were able to choose their care pathway, either OS with remote heart and respiratory rate monitoring by a wearable data logger or standard care with at least one-night hospitalization. Out of the 202 patients, nearly everyone (98.5%) had a preference. Of 199 patients, 99 (49.7%) chose inpatient surgery. Of the 100 with a preference for OS, 23 stayed in the hospital due to medical reasons and 12 patients changed their preference. Based on both initial preference and changed preference, there were no differences between sex, age, body mass index, and co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, nor in the use of anticoagulants or type of surgery. Patients seemed to have a strong preference for their stay after a bariatric procedure. The preference is equally divided between outpatient and inpatient surgery and is not influenced by any patient characteristics.

1906 Identifying Older Frail Patients Suitable for Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC); The Applicability of Patient Selection Scoring System

Abstract Aim Several patient selection scores have been developed to identify patients suitable for SDEC from triage in Emergency Departments (ED) and the acute medical intake. Scores are designed to improve system efficiency, overcrowding and patient experience. Studies have been conducted that compare these; none in frail older adults. This study compared the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS), Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) and the Ambulatory Score (Amb). Methods The Older Person’s Assessment service is ED based, accepting patients with frailty syndromes aged &amp;gt;70 years with same-day discharge for &amp;gt;75% of patients. The OPAS databank was retrospectively analysed from June 2020 to December 2021. Interactions with age, Charlson Co-morbidity index (CCI) and Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) were evaluated alongside each ambulatory score. ED documentation was used to gain triage data. Results 748 attendances, 274(36.6%) Male with mean age 82.8(±8.5) years, CFS 5.2(±1.4) and CCI 6.7(±2.6) with 584(78.1%) discharged same day. Mean Amb score 4.2(±1.7), GAPS 21.4(±5.8), START 23.5(±4.7) all within admission range with 29.1% Mortality within 12 months. There was a significant difference between those admitted and discharged with CFS (p&amp;lt;0.001), mortality (p&amp;lt;0.001), Amb score and START score but not GAPS (p&amp;lt;0.001 vs p=0.03 vs p=0.17). Conclusion Frailty is an important determinant in identifying whether ambulatory care is appropriate. No score could be reliably used as a screen for suitable patients for SDEC services although the Amb score was the most accurate when assessing each individual variable. We are developing our own SDEC score for older, frailer adults which is currently being validated in the OPAS and SDEC settings.

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty at a High-Volume Academic Center: An Analysis of Failure to Launch

BackgroundUnanticipated failure to discharge home (failure to launch, FTL) following scheduled same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is problematic for the surgical facility with respect to staffing, care coordination, and reimbursement concerns. The aim of this study was to review rates, etiologies, and contributing factors for FTL in SDD TJA at an inpatient academic medical center. MethodsAll patients who underwent primary TJA between February 2021 and February 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Of those scheduled for SDD, risk factors for FTL were compared with successful SDD. Readmission and emergency department (ED) visits were compared with historical cohorts. There were 3,093 consecutive primary joint arthroplasties performed, of which 2,411 (78%) were scheduled for SDD. ResultsOverall, SDD was successful in 94.2% (n = 2,272) of patients who had an FTL rate of 5.8%. Specifically, SDD was successful in 91.4% with total hip arthroplasty, 96.0% with total knee arthroplasty, and 98.6% with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Factors that significantly increased the risk of FTL included general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia (P < .0001), later surgery start time (P < .0001), longer surgical time (P = .0043), higher estimated blood loss (P < .0001), women (P = .0102), younger age (P = .0079), and lower preoperative mental health patient-reported outcomes scores (P = .0039). Readmission and ED visit rates were not higher in the SDD group when compared to historical controls (P = .6830). ConclusionsWith a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach dedicated to improving SDDs at an academic medical center, we have seen successful SDD in nearly 80% of primary TJA, with an FTL rate of 5.8%, and no increased risk of readmission or ED visits. Without adding many personnel, hospital recovery units, or other resources, simple interventions to help decrease FTL have included enhanced preoperative education and expectation settings, improved perioperative communications, reallocating personnel from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, the use of short-acting spinal anesthetics, and earlier scheduled surgery times.

Streamlining same-day discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience

Introduction and objectivesSame-day discharge (SDD) can be considered for patients who traditionally required overnight stay (ONS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors aimed to evaluate viability of SDD-PCI. MethodsRetrospective single-center observational study of patients who underwent elective PCI. SDD patients were selected based on clinical, angiographic, and sociodemographic characteristics. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected from local databases, and SDD-PCI adverse events (all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, reintervention, major bleeding, stroke, contrast-induced renal failure, vascular access complications) at 30-days were analyzed. ResultsThis study included 147 patients, 76% males with a mean age of 66±10, that underwent elective PCI during the first year after implementation of SDD protocol. Most patients undergoing elective PCI were discharged the same day (n=94, 64%). ONS group, when compared to SDD, had higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (38% vs 19%, P=.01) and left ventricular dysfunction (17% vs 6%, P=.04), higher Syntax I score (10 points [6–16] vs 8 points [5–12]; P=.01), more cases of multivessel PCI (24% vs 6%, P<.01) and a surrogate for longer procedures – fluoroscopy time (11min [7–15] vs 8min [5–13]; P=.02). There were no adverse events during the 30-day follow-up period of the patients treated in ambulatory regimen. ConclusionsSDD-PCI is a safe procedure. Protocol implementation is key to guide interventional cardiologists in low-risk patient selection. The potential role in decreasing bed-shortage, hospital overcrowding, and healthcare costs is pivotal.