REVIEWS 587 in "socialization," such ludicrous attempts to overleap oneself ...?' Stalin's answer was: 'They could have arisen only as a result of the block-headed belief of a section of our party: "We can achieve anything!" "There isnothing we can't do!'" Such a view was expressed in a document written inJanuary 1928: 'Grain procurements [...] represent the fortress that we must capture at any cost. And we will certainly capture it if we do the job in a bolshevik style, with bolshevik pressure' (document 10).The author ? a certain I. V. Stalin. A few days afterthe publication of 'Dizzy with Success', moreover, theOGPU sent Stalin a long report on 'excesses' perpetrated by local officials (document 72). The volume contains other examples of what looks like scapegoating of local officials for problems resulting from the implementation of policies laid down by the centre (e.g. document 66). The voice of the peasants is represented in only two documents, reflecting the balance of documents in the original Russian volumes. InJuly 1929,peas ant M. D. Mikhailin of Samara province wrote to his son, who seems to have been working inMoscow. He describes how 'they'were takingmost of the peasants' grain, livestock and other belongings away, and asks his son to: 'Write tous about all this, [...] whether thisdecree has been sent out from the center, or it is the local authorities thatmanage things so; we know nothing about this' (document 28). This was only the start of the peasants' troubles. More graphic are the extracts from letterswritten by kulaks exiled to the North in 1930 (document 74). One wrote: 'We already have lots of news? people are swollen with hunger and are hanging themselves.' The volume takes the story to 1930, and is the firstof four projected volumes. Itmakes available English translations of key documents on the first stages of collectivization and dekulakization. The documents are well chosen, the translations readable, and the introductory essays and notes invaluable. The volume is ideal for advanced-level undergraduate and masters' students of Soviet history and also for specialists on agricultural history who do not read Russian. The top-down perspective can be compensated forby assigning it to be read in conjunction with such works as Lynne Viola, Peasant Rebels underStalin: Collectivizationand theCulture ofPeasant Resistance (New York and Oxford, 1996) and Olga Litvienko and James Riordan, Memories of the Dispossessed: Descendants ofKulak Families Tell Their Stories (Nottingham, 1998). Nevertheless, The War Against the Peasantry is greatly to be welcomed. Department of History Universityof Durham David Moon Szlachta, Bogdan. Polish PerspectivesonCommunism: An Anthology. Translated by Tomasz Biero?. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, and Oxford, 2004. 184 pp. Notes. Index. ?46.00. This collection of writings, although formany may sound promising, has a verymisleading tide and is thus disappointing. Polish PerspectivesonCommunism: An Anthologysuggests that the book contains a selection of articles aimed at a broad presentation of attitudes among Poles towards the Soviet system. 588 SEER, 85, 3, JULY 2OO7 However, this general expectation is not met. There are several reasons for this,which I have tried to group below. The first is Szlachta's use of the term 'communism'. He uses itvery freely and, ultimately, irresponsibly.The actual content of the book is a set of essays written during the period from themid 1800s to the Second World War. Hence, they reflect on thewritings ofMarx and Engels and the spread of socialist ideas in Europe (Z. Krasi?ski, A. M. Szymariski, J. Goluchowski), early Bolshevism (J. Parandowski, M. Massonius, A. Krzyzanowski) and, finally,Russia after the Bolshevik revolution and during the interwar years (L.Wasilewski, R. Dmowski, J. K. Roztworowski). Out of thirty-one texts, only two could be called 'modern': by J.M. Boche?ski (from the 1960s) and Z. Stahl (from 1972).The use of the term 'communism' in the titleand intro duction, rather than the much more appropriate 'bolshevism' or 'early social ist ideas' or 'Marx's thought', therefore, is confusing, and leaves the reader wondering whether this is a volume on the early stages ofMarx's ideas as transformed by Lenin and realized by Bolshevism, or about the development of thepolitical, economic and social system from the 1970s (i.e. 'communism...