Sagittal Alignment Research Articles

Unstable C2-3 Posterior Ligamentous Injury in a Pediatric Patient with Successful Nonoperative Treatment: A Case Report.

The authors present a case of a 6-year-old boy who was treated nonoperatively for an unstable C2-3 hyperflexion injury with posterior cervical ligamentous disruption 8 years ago. The patient was managed with cervical collar immobilization for 2.5 years with long-term follow-up demonstrating complete healing of posterior element disruption, normal sagittal vertebral alignment on dynamic imaging, and full return to activities of daily living and sports. Pediatric spine injuries up to the C2-3 level with posterior ligamentous disruption alone without neurological deficit may be successfully treated nonoperatively with careful long-term immobilization and close follow-up.

Standing versus supine pelvic incidence in adult spinal deformity patients.

Pelvic incidence (PI) is commonly used to determine sagittal alignment. Historically, PI was believed to be a fixed anatomic parameter. However, recent studies have suggested that there is positionally-dependent motion that occurs through the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) resulting in changes in PI. We reviewed 100 consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients seen at our academic tertiary referral center. Two reviewers measured pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL) on standing radiographs and scout computed tomography scans (CT). Unilateral, bilateral, or absent SIJ vacuum sign (VS) was determined using CTs. Eighty-six patients (42M:44F) were included with an average age of 64.1 years and BMI of 28.8kg/m2. Standing PI was low (< 50°) in 35 patients (40.7%), average (50°-60°) in 22 (25.6%), and high (> 60°) in 29 (33.7%). Average and high PI patients had significant PI changes of 3.0° (p = 0.037) and 4.6° (p = 0.005), respectively. Bilateral SIJ VS was seen in 68 patients, unilateral VS in 9, and VS was absent in 9. The average change in PI between standing and supine was 2.1° in bilateral SIJ VS patients (p = 0.045), 2.2° in unilateral SIJ VS (p = 0.23), and - 0.1° in patients without SIJ VS (p = 0.93). The average absolute difference in PI between supine and standing was 5.5° ±5.5° (p < 0.001). There is a change in PI from supine to standing. In patients with high PI and bilateral VS on CT, the change from supine to standing is significant, perhaps representing instability of the SIJ.

How global spine sagittal alignment and spinal degeneration affect locomotive syndrome risk in the elderly.

The aim of this study was to delineate the features of the locomotive syndrome (LS) risk stage in the elderly population, encompassing global spine sagittal alignment, visible spinal degenerative changes on plain radiographs, muscle strength, physical capabilities, and low back pain (LBP). The study enrolled 232 subjects, evaluated using plain radiographs. The evaluation included measurements of lumbar lordosis (LLA), thoracic kyphosis (TKA), spinal inclination (SIA) angles, and sagittal vertical axis. Assessments included lumbar osteophyte formation (LOF) and lumbar disc height (LDH) to examine spinal degenerative changes. LS evaluation used the locomotive syndrome risk test based on LS risk criteria, classifying participants into no risk, stage 1 LS, and stage 2 LS groups. Using a visual analogue scale (VAS), we investigated the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and assessed physical performances across these groups. There were 132 participants with no LS risk, 71 with stage 1 LS risk, and 29 with stage 2 LS risk. As LS risk increased, LBP prevalence and VAS scores rose, physical abilities, and back muscle strength decreased. TKA showed no variation across groups, while LLA decreased with advancing LS risk stage. Except for L1-L2 and L5-S1, lumbar disc height (LDH) decreased with higher LS risk stages. LOF occurrence increased notably with higher LS risk stages. Spinal inclination angle (SIA) significantly increased with advancing LS risk stages. Participants diagnosed with LS exhibited an increased incidence of spinal degeneration, reduced LLA, and global spinal imbalance characterized by anterior spinal inclination.

Distal Junctional Failure After Fusion Stopping at L5 in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Radiographic Criteria.

To identify risk factors and establish radiographic criteria for distal junctional failure (DJF) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), who underwent fusion surgery stopping at L5. This retrospective study was undertaken from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients with ASD who underwent fusion surgery (≥5 levels) stopping at L5 were analyzed. DJF was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment pathology at the lumbosacral junction necessitating consideration for revision surgery. Demographic data and radiographic measurements were compared between the DJF and non-DJF groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the radiographic cutoff value for DJF. Among 76 patients, 16 (21.1%) experienced DJF. DJF was associated with older age, antidepressant/anxiolytic medication, longer level of fusions, and worse preoperative sagittal alignment. Antidepressant/anxiolytic medication (odds ratio, 5.60) and preoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch>40° (odds ratio, 5.87) were independent risk factors for DJF. Without both factors, the incidence of DJF has been greatly reduced (9.1%). Two radiographic criteria were determined for DJF: last distal junctional angle (DJA)>-5° and Δ last DJA-post DJA>5°. When both criteria were met, the sensitivity and specificity of the DJF were 93.3% and 91.7%, respectively. Use of antidepressant/anxiolytic medication and preoperative PI-LL mismatch >40° were independent risk factors for DJF. DJF could be diagnosed using postoperative changes in the DJA. If both criteria were met, DJF could be strongly suggested.

Efficiency assessment of intelligent patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the practical use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been reported previously with both advantage and disadvantage. The application of artificial intelligent (AI) forces overwhelmingly development of medical industries, while the impact of AI on PSI efficiency remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of Intelligent-PSI (i-PSI) in TKA, compared with the conventional instrumentation-TKA (CI).Methods102 late-stage OA patients who met inclusive criteria were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial and separated into two groups (i-PSI vs. CI). In both groups, an AI preoperative planning engine was applied for surgery decision making. In CI group, conventional instrumentation was applied for bony resection, while resection of i-PSI group was completed with i-PSI. A convolutional neural network was applied to automatically process computer tomography images and thus produced i-PSI. With the help of three-dimension printing, the workflow of production was largely simplified. AI-driven preoperative planning guided resection and alignment decisions. Resection measurement, perioperative radiography and perioperative clinical outcomes were analyzed to verify efficiency of i-PSI.ResultsIn resection outcomes, smaller deviation of lateral and medial distal femoral resection were found in i-PSI group than CI group (P = 0.032 and 0.035), while no difference was found in other resection planes. In radiography outcomes, postoperative coronal alignments of i-PSI group, including postoperative Hip–knee–ankle axis (HKA) (P = 0.025), postoperative HKA outliners (P = 0.042), Femoral coronal alignment (FCA) (P = 0.019) and Joint line convergence angle (JLCA) (P = 0.043) showed closer to neutral position than CI group. Moreover, Femoral sagittal alignment (FSA) of i-PSI group showed closer to neutral position than CI group(P = 0.005). No difference was found in other alignments. In clinical outcomes, i-PSI group seemed to cost more surgical time than CI group (P = 0.027), while others showed no differences between the two groups.ConclusionIntelligent Patient-specific Instrumentation in TKA achieved simplified production flow than conventional PSI, while also showed more accurate resection, improved synthesis position and limb alignment than conventional instrumentation. Above all, this study proved that i-PSI being an applicable and promising tool in TKA.

Impact of Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Degenerative Spinal Fusion on Two-Year Adjacent Segment Disease and Revision Rates.

Retrospective cohort study. Assess the impact of inadequate correction of L4-S1 lordosis during transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment disease and revision rates. Restoring alignment is an important consideration in spinal fusions. Failure to correct to level-specific alignment goals could promote the development of adjacent segment disease. As such, it is crucial to investigate the role of sagittal segmental alignment on clinical outcomes following short segment lumbar fusion. Patients who underwent 1- to 3-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and had two-year outcomes data were included in this retrospective cohort study. Segmental lumbar lordosis was assessed in all patients with L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 constructs. Demographics, radiographic spinopelvic alignment, and complications were compared in a sub-group of patients fused at L4-S1 with adequate (i.e., within 35-45°) and inadequate (i.e., <35°) L4-S1 lordosis. Among the 168 included patients, mean age was 61.7 years, 56.0% were female, and mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Segmental lumbar lordosis did not change significantly after TLIF of L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 (P>0.05). Two-year postoperatively, 32.7% developed adjacent segment disease and 19.6% underwent revisions. After stratification by adequate (N=15) or inadequate (N=54) restoration of L4-S1 lordosis following initial TLIF surgery, adequately-restored patients had higher preoperative L4-S1 lordosis (Adequately-Restored=39.3° vs Inadequately-Restored=29.5°, P<0.001) and lower two-year postoperative adjacent segment disease (6.7% vs. 33.3%, P=0.032) and revision (5.7% vs. 25.9%, P=0.l33) rates. Adjacent segment disease patients had higher implant-related complications (Adjacent Segment Disease=36.8% vs No Adjacent Segment Disease=8.0%, P=0.008) and subsequent revisions (61.1% vs. 8.7%, P<0.001). Adjacent segment disease and revisions after degenerative lumbar spinal fusion are common. In this cohort, suboptimal restoration of L4-S1 lordosis was associated with higher rates of adjacent segment disease and subsequent revisions, thus highlighting the importance of restoring sagittal alignment in degenerative spine surgery. III.

Type 4 Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures: Surgical Treatment Early Outcomes and a Presentation of the Distal Cortical Fixation.

Background: The most published surgical technique for fixating Type 4 (Salter-Harris II) tibial tubercle avulsion fractures is uni-cortical in nature, and stability is suboptimal. This study presents a technique modification that is consistent with AO principles, by which the screws are aimed distally to purchase the posterior cortex of the distal fragment. This technique is defined as a "Distal Cortical Fixation". This modification has not been studied to date and harbors potential advantages. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of surgical fixation techniques for the above-mentioned fractures and to describe the new modification. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a level 1 children's hospital for surgically treated Salter-Harris II tibial tubercle fractures. Inclusion criteria were patients who sustained Salter-Harris II tibial tubercle avulsion fractures and were documented to reach one of two radiographic endpoints: union (regardless of alignment) or non-union that necessitated additional interventions. Medical records and radiographic studies were analyzed for fracture union and alignment. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate outcomes based on different fixation techniques that included Distal Cortical Fixation, a Proximal Screw Technique, and a crossed or multiple screws/pins construct. Results: A total of 37 patients were included with a mean age of 14.8 ± 1.2 years, with 34/37 (91.9%) being male. The most common procedure was a 1 to 3 screw fixation with a Distal Cortical Fixation (n = 21 (56.75%)), followed by a Proximal Screw Technique (n = 8, 21.62%), and a crossed or multiple screws/pins construct (n = 8, 21.62%). There was no difference between the groups in medical history and demographic features. The mean follow-up duration was 35.17 ± 36.79 weeks. There were no non-unions, and only a minimal change in the sagittal and coronal alignment (0.4 ± 1.94 (p = 0.872) and 0.53 ± 3.51 (p = 0.296) degrees, respectively) was noted and was not associated with the surgical technique. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of Salter-Harris II tibial tubercle avulsion fractures, including Distal Cortical Fixation, was presented and was found to provide satisfactory union rates on a short term follow up.

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis.

This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). A comprehensive search was performed on five electronic databases and major orthopedic journals as of September 24, 2023. We included randomized controlled studies featuring at least two interventions of P-UKA, R-UKA, or C-UKA. Primary outcomes encompassed the deviation angle of hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as the coronal and sagittal plane alignment of femoral and tibial components. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, revision rate, and complication rate. Bayesian framework was employed for risk ratio (RR) or mean deviation (MD) analysis, and treatment hierarchy was established based on rank probabilities. This NMA included 871 knees from 12 selected studies. In sagittal plane, R-UKA exhibited a significantly reduced deviation angle of femoral component compared to P-UKA (MD: 4.16, 95% CI: 0.21, 8.07), and of tibial component in comparison to C-UKA (MD: -2.45, 95% CI: -4.20, -0.68). Notably, the surgery time was significantly longer in R-UKA than in C-UKA (MD: 15.98, 95% CI: 3.11, 28.88). However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact.

Our understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch. A prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age. The median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year. We defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions.

Case-based survey. This study aims to investigate what a group of surgeons learned from their own revisions, and what they would do differently today. A multi-center database of ASD surgical patients was queried to identify those with at least 2 surgical procedures performed by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019. A clinical vignette was created for each case including demographics, a timeline of events, radiographs/measurements, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surgical strategies used for the index and revision surgeries. The operative surgeon was then asked to fill out a five-question survey aimed at determining factors that contribute to operative decision-making and planning. 86 patients were operated on by 6 participating surgeons for both index and revision ASD surgery. The revised patients had similar follow-up compared to the non-revised group (P = 0.73), with the most common complications indicating a need for revision surgery being proximal junctional failure (42%) and pseudoarthrosis (28%). Surgeons reported that they would not change their surgical strategy in 52.3% of the cases. The leading cause for revision was hardware/instrumentation issues (24.4%). Learning points included rod-related choice (23.3%), level selection (19.8), PJF prophylactic strategy (15.1%), and sagittal alignment objective (11.6%). Surgeons saw opportunity in nearly half of the cases to improve outcomes by changing something in the original surgery. While 40% of the failures remained unexplained from the surgeons' perspective, this study highlights the capacity for adopting changes in adult spinal deformity surgery and illuminates the reasoning behind certain surgical decisions.

Possible effects of lumbar stabilization surgery on sagittal alignment, disability and quality of life

BackgroundIn order to restore the individual's health in lumbar stabilization surgeries, it is aimed to bring the sagittal alignment closer to normal values, to eliminate the findings, and thus to increase the quality of life of the individual by reducing the disability level. The aim of this study is to measure the effects of lumbar region stabilization surgeries performed in our clinic on some angular values in the spine, disability and quality of life. Preoperative (preop) and postoperative (postop) radiographs of 30 individuals over the age of 40 who applied to our clinic with various lumbar region complaints and underwent lumbar stabilization surgery between the years 2020–2022 were taken. Lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and pelvic inclination angles were measured from the images obtained. The Visual Analog Scale was used to measure the pain of individuals, the Oswestry Disability Index to measure the disability level, and the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire to measure the quality of life. Preop and postop data were analyzed with the SPSS 23.0 program and p < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThe lumbar lordosis angles of individuals who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery approached normal values and the difference between preop–postop lumbar lordosis angle averages was significant (p < 0.05); It was observed that the harmony between the lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination angles increased, the pain decreased and the difference between preop–postop pain values was significant (p < 0.05), disability levels decreased and quality of life increased.ConclusionsThe decrease in the level of disability and the increase in the quality of life seen in individuals who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery were associated with the decrease in pain; The changes in angular values are considered to be clinically significant.

An Insert Goniometer Can Help Select the Optimal Insert Thickness When Performing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Medial 1:1 Ball-in-Socket and Lateral Flat Surface Insert and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention.

Current surgical practices in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have advanced and include significant changes and improvements in alignment philosophies, femorotibial implant conformities, and ligament management to replicate in vivo knee kinematics. While corrective measures have emphasized sagittal plane alignment to restore normal flexion-extension (F-E) motion and coronal plane ligament balance, internal-external (I-E) rotation kinematics in the axial plane have been largely neglected. Recent in vivo evidence indicates that the combination of factors necessary to closely restore native tibial rotation as the knee flexes and extends is kinematic alignment (KA), which resurfaces the patient's pre-arthritic knee without releasing ligaments, an insert with medial 1:1 ball-in-socket conformity and a lateral flat surface, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention. However, the inherent anterior-posterior (A-P) stability provided by the medial 1:1 ball-in-socket limits the surgeon's ability to select the correct insert thickness using manual laxity testing. Accordingly, this review presents the design and validation of an instrument called an insert goniometer that measures I-E tibial rotation for inserts that differ in thickness by 1 mm and uses rotation limits at extension and 90° flexion to select the optimal insert thickness. The optimal thickness is the one that provides the greatest external tibial orientation in extension and internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion without lift-off of the insert.

Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundOptimal sagittal alignment of the femoral prosthesis is critical to the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy, the efficacy of default femoral alignment versus individualized alignment remains under scrutiny. This study aimed to compare the differences in prosthetic alignment, anatomical restoration, and clinical outcomes between individualized femoral sagittal alignment and default sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted TKA.MethodsIn a prospective randomised controlled trial, 113 patients (120 knees) underwent robotic-assisted TKA were divided into two groups: 61 with individualized femoral flexion (individualized alignment group) and 59 with default 3–5° flexion (default alignment group). The individualized alignment was based on the distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA), defined as the angle between the mechanical and distal anatomical axes of the femur. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsDespite similar postoperative femoral flexion angles between groups (P = 0.748), the individualized alignment group exhibited significantly lower incidences of femoral prosthesis extension and higher rates of optimal 0–3° prosthesis flexion (9.8% vs. 27.1%, P = 0.014,78.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.008, respectively). The individualized alignment group also demonstrated more favourable changes in sagittal anatomy, with higher maintenance of postoperative anterior femoral offset within 1 mm (54.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.026) and posterior condylar offset within 1 mm and 2 mm (44.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.031,73.8% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.010, respectively). Although slight improvement in the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) at three months was observed (P = 0.045), it did not reach a minimal clinically important difference.ConclusionIndividualized tailoring of femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances prosthetic alignment and anatomical restoration, suggesting potential improvements in postoperative outcomes.

Does Sagittal Alignment Matter? A Biomechanical Look at Pinning Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

Closed manipulation and percutaneous pinning is standard of care for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, yet the optimal pin configuration, particularly in the sagittal plane, is not well defined. This study evaluates how sagittal plane pin variations affect construct strength biomechanically. One hundred synthetic pediatric humerus models were used to emulate supracondylar humerus fracture. The models were pinned using 4 different configurations uniformly divergent in the coronal plane with variations in the sagittal plane: (1) 2 diverging pins with the lateral pin anterior (n = 25), (2) 2 diverging pins with the lateral pin posterior (n = 25), (3) 2 parallel pins (n = 25), and (4) 3 parallel pins (n = 25). The models were tested under bending (flexion, extension, and varus) and rotational (internal and external) forces, measuring stiffness and torque. Statistical analyses identified significant differences across configurations. The 2-pin parallel configuration (9.68N/mm in extension, 8.76N/mm in flexion, 0.14 N-m/deg in internal rotation, and 0.14 N-m/deg in external rotation) performed similarly to the 3-pin parallel setup (10.77N/mm in extension, 7.78N/mm in flexion, 0.16 N-m/deg in internal rotation, and 0.14 N-m/deg in external rotation), with no significant differences in stiffness. In contrast, both parallel configurations significantly outperformed the 2-pin anterior (5.22N/mm in extension, 5.7N/mm in flexion, 0.11 N-m/deg in internal rotation and 0.10 N-m/deg in external rotation) and posterior (9.86N/mm in extension, 8.31N/mm in flexion, 0.12N-m/deg in internal rotation, and 0.11 N-m/deg in external rotation) configurations in resisting deformation. No notable disparities were observed in varus loading among any configurations. This study illuminates the sagittal plane's role in construct stability. It suggests that, when utilizing 2-pins, parallel configurations in the sagittal plane improve biomechanical stability. In addition, it suggests avoiding the lateral anterior pin configuration due to its biomechanical inferiority. Further research should assess ultimate strength and compare various 3-pin configurations to better delineate differences between 2-pin and 3-pin configurations regarding sagittal plane alignment. Level III-biomechanical study.

Spino-pelvic parameters and back pain in patients without coronal deformity or history of spinal surgery: A cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND: During the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in spinal sagittal alignment. Most published studies have focused on the role of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity or in those with previous spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore possible association between disability related to back pain and spinopelvic parameters in the absence of coronal deformity or previous spinal surgery. METHODS: In the setting of a larger study involving patients with low back pain (LBP), those without previous surgery or spinal deformity in the coronal plane were selected. A total of 52 patients (mean age 59 years, range 21–86, 23 men and 29 women) were found. The visual analogic scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI) were recorded. Surgimap software was used to measure the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics software. Pearson or Spearman correlation were the test of choice depending on the specific variables. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between SVA and ODI (r 0.59, p&lt; 0.03). Increased pelvic tilt was also associated with more severe disability related to back pain (r 0.48, p&lt; 0.03). PI-LL mismatch showed moderate association with disability and severity of back pain, although this association did not reach statistical significance (r 0.52, p&lt; 0.08). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sagittal misalignment may be related with more severe disability and back pain in patients with minor or null deformity in the coronal plane.

Comparison of Surgical and Conservative Treatments for Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Evaluation of the Need for Surgical Treatment.

Supracondylar humerus fractures (SHFs) are common pediatric injuries, with type II fractures being a topic of debate regarding optimal treatment. Our goals are to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of type II SHFs and their subgroups and to identify parameters for determining the optimal treatment option. We retrospectively reviewed a total of 55 patients (23 conservative, 32 surgical) between 2010 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 66 months. Neurovascular status, range of motion, complications, and functional scores (Mayo elbow, Quick DASH) were evaluated. We performed radiographic assessment on initial, postreduction, and final follow-up radiographs using the humerocondylar angle (HCA), Baumann angle, and anterior humeral line (AHL). Neither groups nor subgroups showed significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes. HCA was significantly higher in the operative group than in the conservative group. The subgroup analysis revealed that the HCA difference resulted from the difference between the conservative IIb and operative IIb subgroups. None of the patients required a corrective osteotomy, but 1 patient initially treated conservatively underwent operative treatment due to loss of reduction. Reconstructing the sagittal, coronal, and rotational alignment in type II SHFs led to good mid-term results in the range of motion and functional scores for the elbow joint, whether conservative or surgical treatment was used. A limited range of remodeling might be expected in the long term. Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Long term mechanical failure in well aligned adult spinal deformity patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXTMechanical complications (MC) are frequently linked to suboptimal postoperative alignment and represent a primary driver of revision surgery in the context of Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD). However, it's worth noting that even among those deemed "well aligned," the risk of experiencing MCs persists, hinting at the potential influence of factors beyond alignment. PURPOSEThe aim was to assess the incidence of MCs among well-aligned patients and delving into the relevant risk factors and surgical outcomes that come into play within this specific subgroup. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a prospective multicenter database dedicated to ASD. PATIENT SAMPLEThe study focused on patients aged 55 years or older, who had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, and exhibited a Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score of 2 points or less (excluding age) within 6 weeks of their index surgery. OUTCOME MEASURESMechanical complications such as rod fractures, pseudarthrosis, or junctional kyphosis or failure, METHODSPatients who developed mechanical complications were identified. Comparative analyses were performed, encompassing both continuous and categorical variables. Furthermore, binary logistic regression tests were employed to pinpoint risk factors, and ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold values for these variables. RESULTSA total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, with a mean age of 66 years. On average, they had 10 instrumented levels, and 77% of them had fusion extending to the pelvis. Additionally, 27% of the patients had undergone 3-column osteotomies (3-CO). Among them, 33 patients (40%) experienced at least 1 MC during an average follow-up period of 4 years, which included 14 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and 20 cases of nonunion or rod breakage. 15 patients (18%) required revision surgery specifically for MC. In univariable analyses, patients who developed MC were characterized by higher body weight, poorer baseline general health (as indicated by worse SF-36 scores), and less favorable preoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. They also had longer hospital stays, a greater number of instrumented levels, and achieved less favorable postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. Interestingly, factors such as 3-column osteotomies, postoperative bracing, and the addition of an anterior approach did not significantly alter the risk of MC in well-aligned adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Binary regression models revealed that independent risk factors for MC included the residual coronal lumbosacral curve, the number of instrumented levels, and Relative Spinopelvic Alignment (RSA). ROC curves identified an optimal threshold of a residual lumbosacral curve of ≤4° and RSA of ≤3°. Moreover, the rate of MCs showed a stepwise increase within the GAP-Proportioned group, with rates of 31% for GAP=0, 54% for GAP=1, and 75% for GAP=2, with RSA emerging as the most influential parameter. Lastly, patients with MC exhibited poorer functional and radiological outcomes at their last follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONSThe rate of MCs remains elevated in sagittally “well-aligned” ASD patients that can be attributed to suboptimal residual sagittal and coronal malalignment, which in turn leads to poorer functional outcomes. This study reaffirms the multifaceted nature of MCs and underscores the significance of achieving impeccable postoperative alignment, particularly in the presence of additional risk factors such as extensive surgical correction, a high lever arm (involving instrumented vertebrae), excessive body weight, and frailty (as indicated by SF-36 scores).

Achievements and complications related to final fusion surgery in early onset scoliosis at the end of "traditional dual growing rod mission".

Retrospective cohort study. Assess the outcomes of final fusion in early onset scoliosis patients treated with TDGR, particularly with acceptable coronal and sagittal alignment at the end of their growing age. Early onset scoliosis (EOS) poses challenges due to the need for managing spinal deformities while accommodating trunk growth. The dual growing rod (TDGR) technique, a traditional approach, aims to address these concerns by periodic lengthening until spinal growth ceases. Recent shifts propose observation without immediate implant removal after achieving spinal alignment, raising questions about the necessity of final fusion surgery. This retrospective study included 22 EOS patients treated with TDGR who underwent final fusion surgery. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed, including pre- and post-surgery measurements, complications, surgical approaches, and screw density. Patients (average initial surgery age: 6.9years) exhibited significant reductions in main curve angle (preoperative: 65.8°, pre-fusion: 49.1°, post-fusion: 36.3°) and thoracic kyphosis (preoperative: 47°, pre-fusion: 46.6°, post-fusion: 38.7°). Complications included one surgical site infection and four transient intraoperative neuro-monitoring Impairment. High screw density correlated with lower total correction. Final fusion surgery post-TDGR treatment shows promise in correcting EOS-associated deformities. Surgeons and parents should be aware of the procedure's complexity and potential complications.

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants.

Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon's treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment. This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal. In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by >10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected. This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment. Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment.

Radiographic Alignment in Deformity Patients Treated With Personalized Interbody Devices: Early Experience From the COMPASS Registry.

Literature supports the need for improved techniques to achieve spinopelvic alignment and reduce complication rates in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Personalized interbody devices were developed to address this need and are under evaluation in the multicenter Clinical Outcome Measures in Personalized aprevo (circle R superscript) Spine Surgery (COMPASS (TM suprascript) registry. This report presents interim COMPASS pre- and postoperative sagittal alignment results and complication rates for a subcohort of COMPASS patients diagnosed and surgically treated for spinal deformity. COMPASS is a postmarket observational registry of patients enrolled either before or after index surgery and then followed prospectively for 24 months. Sagittal alignment was assessed with SRS-Schwab modifiers for pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and T1 pelvic angle. Summed SRS-Schwab modifiers were utilized to assign overall deformity status as mild, moderate, or severe. Complications were extracted from patient medical records. The study included 67 patients from 9 centers. Preoperative severe deformity was observed in 66% of patients. Index surgeries included implantation of a median of 2 personalized interbody devices by anterior, lateral, or transforaminal approaches and with a median of 8 posteriorly instrumented levels. Overall postoperative sagittal alignment improved with a significant decrease in the mean sum of SRS-Schwab modifiers that correlated strongly to improvements in pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Among 44 patients with preoperative severe overall deformity, 16 improved to moderate and 9 to mild deformity. Complications occurred for 13 patients (19.4%), including 1 mechanical complication requiring revision 9 months after surgery and none related to personalized interbody devices. This study demonstrates that ASD patients whose treatment included personalized interbody devices can obtain favorable postoperative alignment status comparable to published results and with no complications related to the personalized interbody devices. This study contributes to growing evidence that personalized interbody devices contribute to improved sagittal alignment in ASD patients by directly adjusting the orientation of adjacent vertebra.