Safety Population Research Articles

EFFICACY, SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF SUBCUTANEOUS INFLIXIMAB (CT-P13 SC) MONOTHERAPY VERSUS COMBINATION THERAPY WITH IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS – POST HOC ANALYSIS OF LIBERTY-CD AND LIBERTY-UC STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC) infliximab formulation demonstrated superiority over placebo in maintenance therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients in two parallel 54 weeks studies (LIBERTY-CD and LIBERTY-UC). We performed a post-hoc subgroup analysis comparing patients treated with CT-P13 SC with and without combination immunosuppressants (IS) at baseline in CD and UC. AIMS & METHODS Patients with moderately to severely active CD and UC who responded at W10 to CT-P13 intravenous infliximab 5mg/kg (Weeks 0, 2 and 6) were randomized (2:1) to receive CT-P13 SC 120 mg (CT-P13 SC) or placebo every 2 weeks until W54 as maintenance therapy. IS (azathioprine [AZA], 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP], or methotrexate [MTX]) were allowed if patients maintained stable doses at least 8 weeks prior to W0, and stable doses were maintained up to W54. RESULTS 231 CD and 294 UC patients were randomized to receive CT-P13 SC maintenance therapy. Among them, 71 (30.7%) and 65 (22.1%) patients received CT-P13 SC with IS in CD and UC, respectively (In CD; 63, 4 and 4 patients of AZA, 6-MP, MTX, respectively, In UC; 63, 2 and 0 patients of AZA, 6-MP, MTX, respectively). There were no meaningful differences in efficacy outcomes at Week 54 by CT-P13 concentration tertiles at Week 54 between monotherapy and combination therapy groups in both studies (Table 1). In combined analysis of CD and UC patients, no statistically significant differences were seen in safety profile between monotherapy and combination therapy groups in the maintenance period except for infection rate (Table 2). In combined analysis of CD and UC patients, rate of anti-drug antibody [ADA] positive conversion up to W54 was statistically lower in combination therapy group (70.2% monotherapy vs 47.8% combination therapy [p<0.0001]). CONCLUSION No meaningful differences in efficacy outcomes at W54 were observed between monotherapy and combination therapy of CT-P13 SC in CD and UC patients. Concomitant IS use was associated with less ADA formation, whereas more infections are seen for combination therapy during maintenance period in CD and UC patients. The overall safety profile during maintenance period was otherwise comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy in CD and UC patients. This post-hoc analysis suggests limited benefit of concomitant IS with CT-P13 SC but a higher infection risk. Notably, patients were not randomized according to IS use nor were the studies ‘powered’ to demonstrate differences. Proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes at W54 by tertile of Serum concentrations of Infliximab (ng/mL) at W54 (Pharmacokinetic population) Safety results in maintenance period (Safety population)

Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) Versus Crizotinib in ALK TKI-Naive Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Positive NSCLC: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study (INSPIRE)

IntroductionIruplinalkib (WX-0593) is a new-generation, potent ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has been found to have systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC. We compared the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib with crizotinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive, locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. MethodsIn this open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study, patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily (7-d run-in at 60 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included PFS by investigator, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, intracranial ORR and time to CNS progression by IRC and investigator, overall survival, and safety. An interim analysis was planned after approximately 70% (134 events) of all 192 expected PFS events assessed by IRC were observed. Efficacy was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the safety population, which included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. This study is registered with Center for Drug Evaluation of China National Medical Products Administration (CTR20191231) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04632758). ResultsFrom September 4, 2019, to December 2, 2020, a total of 292 patients were randomized and treated; 143 with iruplinalkib and 149 with crizotinib. At this interim analysis (145 events), the median follow-up time was 26.7 months (range: 3.7–37.7) in the iruplinalkib group and 25.9 months (range: 0.5–35.9) in the crizotinib group. The PFS assessed by IRC was significantly longer among patients in the iruplinalkib group (median PFS, 27.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.3–not estimable] versus 14.6 mo [95% CI: 11.1–16.5] in the crizotinib group; hazard ratio, 0.34 [98.02% CI: 0.23–0.52], p < 0.0001). The ORR assessed by IRC was 93.0% (95% CI: 87.5–96.6) in the iruplinalkib group and 89.3% (95% CI: 83.1–93.7) in the crizotinib group. The intracranial ORR was 90.9% (10 of 11, 95% CI: 58.7–99.8) in the iruplinalkib group and 60.0% (nine of 15, 95% CI: 32.3–83.7) in the crizotinib group for patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases. Incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 51.7% in the iruplinalkib group and 49.7% in the crizotinib group. ConclusionsIruplinalkib was found to have significantly improved PFS and improved intracranial antitumor activity versus crizotinib. Iruplinalkib may be a new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-positive and ALK TKI-naive NSCLC. FundingThis study was funded by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, People’s Republic of China, and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

OP03 Efficacy and safety of the oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate-1 receptor modulator VTX002 in moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Abstract Background VTX002 is a novel oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate-1 (S1P1) receptor modulator in development for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The efficacy and safety of VTX002 in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) was assessed in a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT05156125). Methods Adults (N=213) with moderately to severely active UC (modified Mayo score [MMS] 4-9) and inadequate response/intolerance to conventional and/or advanced (approved biologics or Janus kinase inhibitor) therapies were randomised 1:1:1 to once daily treatment with placebo (n=70), 30 mg (n=73) or 60 mg (n=70) VTX002 tablets for 13 weeks. Patients underwent a 6–8-day dose titration up to the assigned treatment dose. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (MMS stool frequency subscore ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore=0, and endoscopic subscore [ES] ≤ 1) at week 13. A protocol amendment limiting eligibility to patients with baseline MMS 5-9 resulted in 213 and 209 patients in the safety and efficacy populations, respectively. Key secondary endpoints were endoscopic improvement, symptomatic remission, histologic remission, and endoscopic improvement-histologic remission. Endoscopic remission and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) were also assessed (see Table 1 for outcome definitions). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were assessed for safety. Results The primary endpoint of clinical remission at week 13 was achieved (27.9% of patients who received VTX002 60 mg vs 11.4% of patients who received placebo, ∆=16.5%, p=0.0184). Both doses of VTX002 achieved nominal statistical significance for all key secondary endpoints (Table 1). Significantly greater proportions of patients who received VTX002 60 mg achieved endoscopic remission and HEMI compared to patients who received placebo (29.4% VTX002 60 mg vs 7.1% placebo, ∆=22.3%, p=0.0012, and 32.4% VTX002 60 mg vs 10.0% placebo, ∆=22.4%, p=0.0026, respectively). A dose-dependent decrease of 67.7% and 53.9% in mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) from baseline was observed at week 8 for patients who received VTX002 60 mg and 30 mg, respectively. Most AEs were mild to moderate (Table 2). No AEs of bradycardia, atrioventricular block, serious infections, macular oedema, or deaths were reported. Conclusion The S1P1 receptor modulator VTX002 was well-tolerated and statistically superior to placebo for induction of clinical, endoscopic, histologic, HEMI, and symptomatic remission/response at week 13. These positive findings, including a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic reduction in ALC, support phase 3 development of VTX002 for treatment of UC.

Study of antacid effect of the drug Antareit® in healthy volunteers

The aim. Study of pharmacodynamic parameters and confirmation of pharmacodynamic equivalence (bioequivalence) of the drugs Antareit® (INN: magaldrate), chewable tablets, 800 mg (Valenta Pharm JSC, Russia) and Riopan (INN magaldrate), chewable tablets, 800 mg (Takeda GmbH, Germany). Material and methods. An open randomized crossover study was conducted to investigate the pharmacodynamics of the study drug Antareit® and the reference drug Riopan, assessing their bioequivalence after taking 2 chewable tablets of the study or reference drug 3 times a day. The study involved 40 healthy volunteers who were randomized into 2 groups of 20 people depending on the sequence of drug administration in study periods I and II. Intragastric acidity was measured with a pH-probe within 30 minutes before and for one hour after taking the study drugs. Based on the data obtained, 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the pharmacodynamic parameter AUCABL, reflecting the area above the baseline pH. The safety of the study drugs was assessed by the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results. Statistical analysis showed that the 90% CI for the ratio of the mean values of the AUC ABL parameter of the study drug to the reference drug did not fall below 80% (90% CI: 80.55–119.49). During the study, 18 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 15.4% (6 of 39) of volunteers in the safety population, and there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of AEs between groups, nor in the incidence of AEs depending on the drug taken. Conclusion. The studied drugs are pharmacodynamically equivalent and have a similar safety profile when administered repeatedly.

A phase 2, open-label, safety and efficacy study of telotristat ethyl plus first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

472 Background: Patients (pts) with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a poor prognosis. In preclinical models of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) telotristat ethyl (TE), a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor that reduces production of serotonin, enhanced the antiproliferative effects of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of adding TE to GC chemotherapy in pts with advanced BTC. Methods: This was a Phase 2 open-label study. Eligible pts had unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC, were treatment naïve and had plans to initiate GC chemotherapy. On Day 1, pts received Gem 1000mg/m2 and Cis 25mg/m2 with TE 250 mg orally three times daily (TID) for 7 days. Thereafter, pts received TE 500 mg TID continuously plus GC therapy on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The study comprised of 2 stages: stage 1 would enroll 20 patients with a safety run-in cohort in the first 6 pts to monitor safety and tolerability of TE + GC treatment for 21 days. Stage 2 would enroll 33 patients if no significant/unresolved grade 3 or higher toxicities related to study drug occurred in stage 1. The primary endpoint was 6-month (mo) progression free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST 1.1. If 60% of pts (≥34) in the safety population were alive and progression free at 6-mos, the study was considered successful. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Restaging occurred every 9 weeks using RECIST 1.1 and toxicities were graded using CTCAE v 5.0. Results: Between 2019 and 2021, fifty-three pts were enrolled across 12 study sites and comprised the safety population. The majority of pts were female (62.3%) and median age was 66 yrs (range 33 to 79). Baseline mean plasma 5-HIAA was 11.1 µg/L (ULN defined as &gt;10.8 µg/L). Thirty-one pts (58.5%) had plasma 5-HIAA levels ≤ULN and 22/53 (41.5%) had 5-HIAA levels &gt;ULN. Majority of pts had metastatic BTC (85%) and liver was the most common primary tumor site (66%). The 6-month PFS rate was 22.6% (12/53). Based on blinded independent central review, the ORR was 13.2% and DCR was 62.3%. Mean reduction in plasma 5-HIAA at 6 mos was -1.735 µg/L (SD 8.69) in 24 patients with available data. There was no difference in 6-mo PFS rate based on pts baseline 5-HIAA status; 58% (14/24) pts had ≥30% decrease from baseline in 5-HIAA, however there was no correlation with 6-month PFS. The most common TE related TEAEs were constipation (43.4%), nausea (28.3%) and fatigue (28.3%). Conclusions: The study did not achieve its primary endpoint of 60% of patients on TE plus GC chemotherapy being alive and progression free at 6 months. TE did reduce 5-HIAA levels in a subset of pts; however, this did not correlate to improved clinical outcomes. No significant safety issues noted with TE in combination with GC chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03790111 .

Amivantamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: OrigAMI-1, an open-label, phase 1b/2 study.

135 Background: Amivantamab (ami), an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity, has shown preclinical activity in colorectal cancer (CRC) models. MET amplification is implicated in driving resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic CRC (mCRC). We hypothesize that dual, co-inhibition of EGFR and MET with ami could improve outcomes in relapsed/refractory mCRC. Methods: OrigAMI-1 (NCT05379595) is assessing the safety and efficacy of ami as monotherapy in patients (pts) with refractory mCRC in 3 separate cohorts (Table). Eligible pts were wild-type for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR ectodomain by ctDNA testing, without ERBB2/ HER2 amplification. Cohorts A and B included pts with left-sided mCRC without/with prior exposure to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, respectively, and cohort C included pts with right-sided mCRC. Safety population included all pts receiving the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 1050 mg [1400 mg, ≥80kg]). Investigator-assessed response per RECIST v1.1 is reported for evaluable pts with post-baseline disease assessment(s) or who discontinued for any reason. Ami plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is being explored in additional cohorts. Results: As of September 4, 2023, 93 pts were treated at RP2D; 89 were response evaluable (median follow-up: 4.4 mo). Median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and median prior lines of therapy were 2, with 94% receiving prior bevacizumab and 69% prior anti-EGFR therapy. Best timepoint responses were: Cohort A: 7/17, 41.2%; Cohort B: 13/54, 24.1%; Cohort C: 1/18, 5.6%. Disease control rates (DCR) were 88.2%, 72.2%, and 77.8% for Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Median duration of response (mDoR) for confirmed responders was 7.5 and 7.4 mo for Cohorts A and B, respectively. Treatment is ongoing for the responder in Cohort C. 10/13 responders (77%) remain on treatment. Preliminary biomarker data suggest ami may be active in alterations associated with anti-EGFR antibody resistance (eg, EML4-ALK fusion, PTEN). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (84%) and infusion-related reactions (53%). No new safety signals were observed. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Ami monotherapy demonstrated promising, durable antitumor activity in refractory mCRC, including pts treated with prior anti-EGFR therapy and pts with right-sided disease. The safety profile of ami in mCRC is manageable and consistent with prior NSCLC experience. Clinical trial information: NCT05379595 . [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus CapeOX in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GC/EGJC): Results from the cohort C of phase II NICE trial.

349 Background: Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for localized GC or EGJC and perioperative chemotherapy seems ineffective for those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Chemotherapy may booster antitumor immunity. There is a compelling need to investigate the efficacy of perioperative immunochemotherapy for those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Methods: NICE trial is a multicenter, multi-cohort phase II trial (NCT04744649) investigating the safety and efficacy of toripalimab combined with CapeOX regimen as perioperative treatment for localized GC or EGJC of PD-L1 CPS≥5 (IHC 22C3) (cohort A), EBV-positive (cohort B), and dMMR/MSI-H (cohort C). Among those cohorts, the cohort A was compared with the control group of perioperative CapeOX regimen in a randomized controlled trial manner, while the cohort B and C were single arm. In present study, we report the findings of Cohort C, and the patients (pts) received toripalimab 240 mg combined with standard dose CapeOX regimen q3 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. The eligible tumor stages were cT3-4aNxM0 or cT2N+M0 diagnosed by chest and abdominal CT combined with staging laparoscopy as well as negative peritoneal cytology. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR, &lt;10% viable cells) rate. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was utilized to explore changes of immune microenvironment. Results: Between March 2021 and April 2023, 15 pts with dMMR/MSI-H localized GC/GEJC were recruited in Cohort C. Tumor stages were cT3N0(n=2), cT3N1-3 (n=2), cT4aN0 (n=1) and cT4aN1-3 (n=10). 14 pts completed all 4 cycles therapy preoperatively and one patient completed 2 cycles therapy because of AEs. None had disease progression, while one achieved a complete clinical response at radiology and endoscopy and refused surgery and the other 14 pts underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 100% (14/14). The MPR rate was 92.9% (13/14) and the residual tumor percentage was 33.8% in the other one patient (cT4aN2). pCR rate was 78.6% (11/14). Therapy-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 5 pts of safety population (n=15). One patient occurred grade 3 immune-related liver toxicity after 2 cycles treatment and recovered after steroids therapy. No pts died during the perioperative treatment, and one patient died of COVID-19 238 days after surgery without relapse. No disease relapse was observed in all pts. The mIHC revealed a significant reduction in CD20+ B cells, CD3+ T cells, NK dim cells, and M1 macrophages within tumor area after treatment for patients who reached pCR. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant toripalimab and CapeOX regimen for the localized dMMR/MSI-H GC/GEJC is safety with high MPR rate. These data indicate that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy may potentially become one of the treatment options for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04744649 .

Topical Clindamycin For Acne Vulgaris: Pharmacovigilance Safety Review and Retrospective Analysis of Gastrointestinal Events

Background: Clindamycin, a lincosamide antibiotic, was the 125th most prescribed medicine in the US in 2020. Topical formulations that combine clindamycin with benzoyl peroxide or a retinoid are commonly used for acne vulgaris (AV) treatment. While oral and topical clindamycin carry warnings/contraindications regarding the development of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs), the real-world incidence of these AEs with topical clindamycin is unknown. The objective is to provide an overview of safety data for topical clindamycin when used for AV treatment.&#x0D; Methods: Safety data from published literature on PubMed® (case reports, clinical trials data, retrospective data), previously unpublished worldwide pharmacovigilance data (from January 1, 1900-December 31, 2022), and two unpublished retrospective cohort studies of US electronic medical records (EMR; January 1, 2011 to January 31, 2019) were reviewed, with a focus on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and GI AEs following topical clindamycin monotherapy or combination treatment&#x0D; Results: There have been only 4 published case reports of topical clindamycin-associated GI AEs, which were all published between the years 1981-1997. In 8 published pivotal phase 3 clinical trials of topical clindamycin monotherapy or combination treatment for AV, GI-related AEs were reported in 1.4% of clindamycin-treated participants (38/2,672; safety populations). According to the pharmacovigilance data, the rate of GI-related adverse drug reactions with topical clindamycin-containing products was 0.000045% (64/141,084,533). In 1 published retrospective report, there were 0 reports of colitis from the 1,124 patients estimated to have received topical clindamycin prescriptions in the years 1977-1980. In the first retrospective EMR study, results indicate that physicians prescribe topical clindamycin for AV treatment equally to patients with a history of IBD (19.0%; 98/515) or without (20.7%; 14,495/70,151). The second retrospective EMR study showed that among patients with AV and an initial prescription for topical clindamycin (monotherapy or combination; n=18,012), there were 3 (0.02%) incident cases of pseudomembranous colitis within 30 days; none of these cases had a history of IBD.&#x0D; Conclusions: A review of published case reports, clinical trials safety data, worldwide pharmacovigilance data, and retrospective US prescription data demonstrate that GI events—including colitis or pseudomembranous colitis—in patients exposed to topical clindamycin is extremely low, regardless of IBD history.&#x0D; Support: Ortho Dermatologics

Clinical antiviral efficacy of favipiravir in early COVID-19 (PLATCOV): an open-label, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial

Brief summaryIn early symptomatic COVID-19 treatment, high dose oral favipiravir did not accelerate viral clearance.BackgroundFavipiravir, an anti-influenza drug, has in vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Clinical trial evidence to date is inconclusive. Favipiravir has been recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 in some countries.MethodsIn a multicentre open-label, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial, low-risk adult patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 were randomised to one of ten treatment arms including high dose oral favipiravir (3.6g on day 0 followed by 1.6g daily to complete 7 days treatment) or no study drug. The primary outcome was the rate of viral clearance (derived under a linear mixed-effects model from the daily log10 viral densities in standardised duplicate oropharyngeal swab eluates taken daily over 8 days [18 swabs per patient]), assessed in a modified intention-to-treat population (mITT). The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of the allocated intervention. This ongoing adaptive platform trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05041907) on 13/09/2021.ResultsIn the final analysis, the mITT population contained data from 114 patients randomised to favipiravir and 126 patients randomised concurrently to no study drug. Under the linear mixed-effects model fitted to all oropharyngeal viral density estimates in the first 8 days from randomisation (4,318 swabs), there was no difference in the rate of viral clearance between patients given favipiravir and patients receiving no study drug; a -1% (95% credible interval: -14 to 14%) difference. High dose favipiravir was well-tolerated.InterpretationFavipiravir does not accelerate viral clearance in early symptomatic COVID-19. The viral clearance rate estimated from quantitative measurements of oropharyngeal eluate viral densities assesses the antiviral efficacy of drugs in vivo with comparatively few studied patients.

Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treating functional constipation in paediatric patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist, has been approved in the USA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation in adults. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in paediatric patients aged 6-17 years with functional constipation. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study was done at 64 clinic or hospital sites in seven countries (USA, Canada, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Estonia). Patients aged 6-17 years who met modified Rome III criteria for functional constipation were randomly assigned (1:1), with a block size of four and stratified by age (6-11 years and 12-17 years), to receive either oral linaclotide 72 μg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and data assessors were masked to assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in the 12-week frequency rate of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs; occurring in the absence of rescue medication on the calendar day of or before the bowel movement) per week and the secondary efficacy endpoint was CFB in stool consistency over the 12-week treatment period; efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients in the randomised population who received at least one dose of study intervention (modified intention-to-treat population and safety population, respectively). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04026113, and the functional constipation part of the study is complete. Between Oct 1, 2019, and March 21, 2022, 330 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to linaclotide (n=166) or placebo (n=164). Two patients in the linaclotide group did not receive any treatment; thus, efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in 328 patients (164 patients in each group). 293 (89%) patients completed the 12-week treatment period (148 in the linaclotide group and 145 in the placebo group). 181 (55%) of 328 patients were female and 147 (45%) were male. At baseline, the mean frequency rate for SBMs was 1·28 SBMs per week (SD 0·87) for placebo and 1·16 SBMs per week (0·83) for linaclotide, increasing to 2·29 SBMs per week (1·99) for placebo and 3·41 SBMs per week (2·76) for linaclotide during intervention. Compared with placebo (least-squares mean [LSM] CFB 1·05 SBMs per week [SE 0·19]), patients treated with linaclotide showed significant improvement in SBM frequency (LSM CFB 2·22 SBMs per week [0·19]; LSM CFB difference 1·17 SBMs per week [95% CI 0·65-1·69]; p<0·0001). Linaclotide also significantly improved stool consistency over placebo (LSM CFB 1·11 [SE 0·08] vs 0·69 [0·08]; LSM CFB difference 0·42 [95% CI 0·21-0·64]; p=0·0001). The most reported treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) by patients treated with linaclotide was diarrhoea (seven [4%] of 164 vs three [2%] of 164 patients in the placebo group) and by patients treated with placebo was COVID-19 (five [3%] vs four [2%] in the linaclotide group). The most frequent treatment-related TEAE was diarrhoea (linaclotide: six [4%] patients; placebo: two [1%] patients). One serious adverse event of special interest (treatment-related severe diarrhoea resulting in dehydration and hospitalisation) occurred in a female patient aged 17 years in the linaclotide group; this case resolved without sequelae after administration of intravenous fluids. No deaths occurred during the study. Linaclotide is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for functional constipation in paediatric patients and has subsequently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. AbbVie and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02600897. Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60-75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1-3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7-25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20-43). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis). Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

P29 Treatment outcomes with rezafungin and caspofungin in people aged 65 years and above with candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis: integrated analysis of pooled Phase 2 and Phase 3 data

Abstract Background Factors including frailty and multimorbidity can affect candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis (C/IC) treatment in older people.1 The current analysis explored data from C/IC patients aged ≥65 years who were treated with rezafungin or caspofungin in the STRIVE (Phase 2: NCT02734862) and ReSTORE (Phase 3: NCT03667690) clinical trials.2,3 Methods STRIVE and ReSTORE were double-blind, randomized studies. Adults with C/IC, diagnosed by systemic signs and mycological confirmation, received rezafungin once-weekly (Week 1: 400 mg; Weeks 2–4: 200 mg) or once-daily caspofungin (Day 1: 70 mg; Days 2–28: 50 mg) by IV injection for ≥14 days (≤4 weeks). Post hoc analysis examined pooled STRIVE/ReSTORE data for subjects aged ≥65 years. Safety outcomes included treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in subjects who received ≥1 dose of study drug (safety population). Day 30 all-cause mortality (ACM) and mycological response at Days 5 and 14 were examined for the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (subjects with mycological C/IC diagnosis within 96 h of randomization who received ≥1 study drug dose). Results The safety population included 132 subjects (rezafungin arm: 64; caspofungin arm: 68). The mITT population included 120 subjects (rezafungin arm: 57; caspofungin arm: 63). The most common TEAEs with rezafungin were hypokalaemia, diarrhoea, vomiting and anaemia (Table 1). Eight subjects reported rezafungin-related TEAEs and seven had caspofungin-related TEAEs. SAEs comprised one case each of first degree atrioventricular block (rezafungin arm) and acute liver injury (caspofungin arm). Day 30 ACM rate was 14.0% (rezafungin arm) and 31.7% (caspofungin arm). The between-group difference (95% CI) was -17.6 (−32.5, −2.8). Day 5 mycological response was 78.9% (rezafungin arm) and 58.7% (caspofungin arm; difference [95% CI]: 19.3 [3.3, 35.2]; Figure 1). Conclusions Integrated analysis of pooled STRIVE/ReSTORE study data revealed similar incidence of drug-related TEAEs and SAEs in patients aged ≥65 years treated with rezafungin or caspofungin. Further analyses are required to understand underlying factors influencing between-group differences regarding treatment outcomes.

Adherence to Background Antipsychotic and Pimavanserin in Patients with Schizophrenia: Post Hoc Analyses from the ENHANCE and ADVANCE Studies.

In patients with schizophrenia, study design to optimize adherence and objective measurement of adherence is critical for interpreting results. Two randomized, double-blind studies evaluating adjunctive pimavanserin in patients with schizophrenia who received stable antipsychotic treatment included measures to encourage and assess treatment adherence. This post hoc analysis evaluated adherence levels achieved in the Phase III ENHANCE study (NCT02970292) and the Phase II ADVANCE study (NCT02970305). Blood levels of participants receiving adjunctive treatment with pimavanserin or placebo added to their ongoing antipsychotic medication were tested and evaluated regularly throughout both studies. For both the background antipsychotic and pimavanserin, treatment adherence was defined as a blood sample test result above the lower limit of quantification. Overall, 392 of 633 screened patients and 403 of 608 screened patients were in the safety populations in ENHANCE and ADVANCE, respectively. In ENHANCE, at weeks 1, 3, and 6/early termination (ET), the adherence rates remained ≥ 95.1% for the background antipsychotic in both pimavanserin and placebo treatment groups and ≥ 96.8% for pimavanserin. In ADVANCE, high adherence rates (≥90.6%) with the background antipsychotic (for both treatment groups) and pimavanserin (≥95.0%) were observed at weeks 2, 8, 14, and 26/ET. Rigorous screening was performed to exclude patients not adherent to their background antipsychotic before enrollment and to pimavanserin during study visits by using regular blood sampling. Mandatory caregiver participation further supported adherence to study treatment and procedures. These efforts may have contributed to the high levels of adherence to both background antipsychotic and pimavanserin reported in ENHANCE and ADVANCE.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures

ObjectiveTo report the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) treatment in reducing focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). MethodsData were pooled from 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adjunctive ESL in patients with focal seizures. Patients treated with 800 or 1200 mg/day ESL and who experienced ≥ 1 FBTCS during baseline were included. Efficacy was measured using FBTCS standardized seizure frequency (SSF), responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%), and time to first FBTCS. Adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for each subgroup. ResultsOf the original 1447 patients, 438 patients in the safety population were included with ≥ 1 FBTCS at baseline (efficacy population, n = 429). Patients with ≥ 2 FBTCS (safety, n = 354; efficacy, n = 346) and ≥ 3 FBTCS (safety, n = 294; efficacy, n = 288) at baseline were also analyzed.The 1200 mg/day ESL group experienced lower least squares mean SSF vs placebo in patients with ≥ 1 baseline FBTCS (P = 0.0395) and ≥ 3 baseline FBTCS (P = 0.0091). The 50% responder rates improved for 1200 mg/day ESL vs placebo (≥1 FBTCS, P = 0.005; ≥2 FBTCS, P = 0.0063; ≥3 FBTCS, P = 0.0016). The 75% responder rates improved with 1200 mg/day ESL vs placebo (≥1 FBTCS, P = 0.0315; ≥2 FBTCS, P = 0.0215; ≥3 FBTCS, P = 0.0099), and with 800 mg/day ESL for ≥ 2 FBTCS at baseline (P = 0.0486). The 100% responder rate was higher in patients treated with 1200 mg/day ESL (not significant). Time to first FBTCS was longer with both 800 (P = 0.0008) and 1200 mg/day (P = 0.0020) ESL vs placebo for the ≥ 1 FBTCS subgroup, and with 1200 mg/day ESL for ≥ 2 FBTCS (P = 0.0060) and ≥ 3 FBTCS (P = 0.0152) subgroups.Overall, AEs occurred at similar rates across subgroups, and were lower than the original RCTs. ConclusionAdjunctive ESL produced a robust response in patients with FBTCS, a seizure type associated with SUDEP and high injury rates. Adjunctive ESL was well tolerated in patients who experienced FBTCS.

Efficacy and safety of 48 weeks of guselkumab for patients with Crohn's disease: maintenance results from the phase 2, randomised, double-blind GALAXI-1 trial

Many patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease do not respond to available therapies or lose response over time. The GALAXI-1 study previously found that three intravenous guselkumab dosages showed superior clinical and endoscopic outcomes over placebo at week 12 in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. We report the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous guselkumab maintenance regimens to week 48 in the GALAXI-1 study. We did a phase 2, randomised, multicentre, double-blind trial. Adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease were randomly allocated with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive one of five treatment groups, with regimens consisting of an intravenous induction phase transitioning to a subcutaneous maintenance phase starting at week 12 in a treat-through design: (1) guselkumab 200→100 mg group (200 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 100 mg subcutaneous every 8 weeks; (2) guselkumab 600→200 mg group (600 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 200 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks); (3) guselkumab 1200→200 mg group (1200 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 200 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks); (4) ustekinumab group (approximately 6 mg/kg intravenous at week 0, then 90 mg subcutaneous every 8 weeks); or (5) placebo group (placebo induction followed by either placebo maintenance [for those with CDAI clinical response at week 12] or crossover to ustekinumab [for those without CDAI clinical response at week 12]). Endpoints assessed at week 48 included CDAI remission (CDAI score <150), endoscopic response (≥50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD or SES-CD score ≤2), and endoscopic remission (SES-CD score ≤2) in the primary efficacy analysis population of all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug, excluding those discontinued during a temporary study pause. Safety analyses included all randomised patients who received at least one study drug dose. This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03466411) and is active but not recruiting. Among 700 patients screened, 309 (112 biologic-naive; 197 biologic-experienced) were included in the primary efficacy analysis population: 61 in the guselkumab 200→100 mg group, 63 in the guselkumab 600→200 mg group, 61 in the guselkumab 1200→200 mg group, 63 in the ustekinumab group, and 61 in the placebo group. 126 (41%) women and 183 (59%) men were included, with median age 36·0 years (IQR 28·0-49·0). At week 48, the numbers of patients with CDAI clinical remission were 39 (64%) in the guselkumab 200→100 mg group, 46 (73%) in the guselkumab 600→200 mg group, 35 (57%) in the guselkumab 1200→200 mg group, and 37 (59%) in the ustekinumab group. The corresponding numbers of patients with endoscopic response were 27 (44%), 29 (46%), 27 (44%), and 19 (30%), respectively, and endoscopic remission was seen in 11 (18%), 11 (17%), 20 (33%), and four (6%) patients, respectively. In the placebo group, 15 patients were in CDAI clinical response at week 12 and continued placebo; of these, nine (60%) were in clinical remission at week 48. 44 patients in the placebo group were not in CDAI clinical response at week 12 and crossed over to ustekinumab; of these, 26 (59%) were in clinical remission at week 48. Up to week 48, adverse events frequencies in the safety population (n=360) were 46 (66%) of 70 patients (464·9 events per 100 patient-years of follow-up) in the placebo group, 163 (74%) of 220 patients (353·1 per 100 patient-years) in the three guselkumab groups combined, and 60 (85%) of 71 patients (350·7 per 100 patient-years) in the ustekinumab group. Among patients treated with guselkumab or ustekinumab, the most frequently reported infections up to week 48 were nasopharyngitis (25 [11%] of 220 guselkumab recipients, 12 [11%] of 114 ustekinumab recipients) and upper respiratory infections (13 [6%] guselkumab recipients, eight [7%] ustekinumab recipients). After week 12, one patient who responded to placebo induction and two guselkumab-treated patients had serious infections. No active tuberculosis, opportunistic infections, or deaths occurred. Patients receiving guselkumab intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance treatment achieved high rates of clinical and endoscopic efficacy up to week 48. No new safety concerns were identified. Janssen Research & Development.

Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor130): final overall survival analysis results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

IMvigor130 demonstrated statistically significant investigator-assessed progression-free survival benefit with first-line atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group A) versus placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group C) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Overall survival was not improved in interim analyses. Here we report the final overall analysis for group A versus group C. In this global, partially blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study, patients (aged ≥18 years) with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled at 221 hospitals and oncology centres in 35 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), with a permuted block method (block size of six) and an interactive voice and web response system, stratified by PD-L1 status, Bajorin risk factor score, and investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy, to receive atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group A), atezolizumab monotherapy (group B), or placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group C). Sponsors, investigators, and patients were masked to assignment to atezolizumab or placebo (ie, group A and group C) and atezolizumab monotherapy (group B) was open label. For groups A and C, all patients received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously; day 1 and day 8 of each 21-day cycle), plus investigator's choice of carboplatin (area under curve 4·5 mg/mL per min or 5 mg/mL per min; intravenously) or cisplatin (70 mg/m2 intravenously), plus either atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle. Co-primary endpoints of the study were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival for group A versus group C in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all randomised patients), and overall survival for group B versus group C, tested hierarchically. Final overall survival and updated safety outcomes (safety population; all patients who received any amount of any study treatment component) for group A versus group C are reported here. The final prespecified boundary for significance of the overall survival analysis was one-sided p=0·021. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807636, and is active but no longer recruiting. Between July 15, 2016, and July 20, 2018, 1213 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment, of whom 851 were assigned to group A (n=451) and group C (n=400). 338 (75%) patients in group A and 298 (75%) in group C were male, 113 (25%) in group A and 102 (25%) in group C were female, and 346 (77%) in group A and 304 (76%) in group C were White. At data cutoff (Aug 31, 2022), after a median follow up of 13·4 months (IQR 6·2-30·8), median overall survival was 16·1 months (95% CI 14·2-18·8; 336 deaths) in group A versus 13·4 months (12·0-15·3; 310 deaths) in group C (stratified hazard ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·73-1·00]; one-sided p=0·023). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (168 [37%] of 454 patients who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy vs 133 [34%] of 389 who received placebo plus chemotherapy), neutropenia (167 [37%] vs 115 [30%]), decreased neutrophil count (98 [22%] vs 95 [24%]), thrombocytopenia (95 [21%] vs 70 [18%]), and decreased platelet count (92 [20%] vs 92 [24%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 243 (54%) patients who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 196 (50%) patients who received placebo plus chemotherapy. Treatment-related deaths occurred in nine (2%; acute kidney injury, dyspnoea, hepatic failure, hepatitis, neutropenia, pneumonitis, respiratory failure, sepsis, and thrombocytopenia [n=1 each]) patients who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and four (1%; unexplained death, diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia, and toxic hepatitis [n=1 each]) who received placebo plus chemotherapy. Progression-free survival benefit with first-line combination of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy did not translate into a significant improvement in overall survival in the ITT population of IMvigor130. Further research is needed to understand which patients might benefit from first-line combination treatment. No new safety signals were observed. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Abstract LB_A25: Updated Phase 1 results from the PYNNACLE Phase 1/2 study of PC14586, a selective p53 reactivator, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation

Abstract Background: Mutations in the TP53 gene leading to p53 inactivation are the most common mutational event across human cancers. PC14586 is a first-in-class p53 reactivator that selectively binds to the mutated p53 Y220C protein and restores p53 wild-type activity. Preclinical data support potential for activity of PC14586 across TP53 Y220C-bearing tumors, with enhanced activity in KRAS wild-type (WT) models, consistent with the important parallel roles for p53 inactivation and oncogenic KRAS in tumorigenesis. Preliminary analysis of Phase 1 data from the Phase 1/2 PYNNACLE trial (NCT04585750) evaluating PC14586 in patients with advanced TP53 Y220C solid tumors showed that PC14586 was well tolerated with preliminary clinical activity across multiple tumor types in the efficacious dose range (1150 mg QD to 1500 mg BID). This updated Phase 1 analysis assesses PC14586 in patients treated across the efficacious dose range. Methods: Eligible patients (≥12 years) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a TP53 Y220C mutation received increasing oral doses of PC14586 to evaluate safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy via RECIST v1.1, and to determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D). Tumor molecular profiling was assessed for the impact of KRAS status on response. Results: As of 1 May 2023, 61 patients were treated in the efficacious dose range (safety population): median age 63 (range 32-84) years, 62% female, and median of 3 (range 1–9) prior lines of systemic therapy. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥10%) were nausea (42.3%), vomiting (35.2%), diarrhea (19.7%), increased creatinine (18.3%), fatigue (14.1%), and increased AST and ALT (12.7% each); 3% of patients discontinued PC14586 due to TRAEs. Most TRAEs were grade 1 or 2; the most common grade 3 TRAEs were anemia (4.2%) and increased ALT (2.8%). PC14586 administered with food led to improvement in nausea and vomiting. Dose proportional and linear PK was observed with a median half-life of 19 hours. Among patients with measurable disease, 36 patients had KRAS WT and 15 patients had KRAS mutated tumors. A total of 12 PRs (ORR 33.3%) were observed (9 confirmed and 3 unconfirmed - pending confirmation) in patients with KRAS WT disease across multiple tumor types including ovarian, breast, prostate, small-cell lung, and endometrial cancer. The median duration of confirmed response was 7 months. In patients with a KRAS mutation, there were no confirmed responses, although clinical activity was observed. At 2000 mg QD, the ORR was 46.2% in patients with TP53 Y220C and KRAS WT tumors (n=13). A RP2D of 2000 mg QD was selected based on overall safety, PK and preliminary efficacy. Conclusions: PC14586 was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Efficacy was achieved in heavily pre-treated patients across multiple tumor types. The PYNNACLE registrational Phase 2 trial will assess PC14586 as monotherapy at the RP2D of 2000 mg QD in patients with TP53 Y220C and KRAS WT advanced solid tumors. Additional/updated data will be presented at the conference. Citation Format: Alison M Schram, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Melissa L Johnson, Anthony W. Tolcher, John A Thompson, Anthony B El-Khoueiry, Andrae L Vandross, Shivaani Kummar, Aparna R Parikh, Dale R Shepard, Ursula Garczarek, Kim LeDuke, Lisa Sheehan, Marc Fellous, Leila Alland, Ecaterina E Dumbrava. Updated Phase 1 results from the PYNNACLE Phase 1/2 study of PC14586, a selective p53 reactivator, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LB_A25.

Abstract B042: Efficacy and safety outcomes of ABN401 in NSCLC patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping: A clinically relevant subgroup analysis

Abstract Background: In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 3-4% of patients exhibit MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) mutations. ABN401, a selective type I MET kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity and safety in advanced solid tumor patients. Here, we report updated outcomes of ABN401, focusing on METex14 NSCLC patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the ABN401 Phase I (NCT04052971) and Phase II (NCT05541822) trials were analyzed. The safety population consists of all patients who have been dosed at ABN401 800 mg QD, while the efficacy population comprises METex14 NSCLC patients dosed at 800 mg QD. The primary objective for phase I study was safety, and for phase II study was the objective response rate (ORR) in patients. Secondary objectives include recommended dose and regimen of ABN401, PK and preliminary efficacy of ABN401 for phase I and duration of response (DOR), objective disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), PK, safety, and tolerability of ABN401 for phase II. Results: Between June 23, 2022, and July 6, 2023, a total of 24 patients received ABN401 800 mg QD, including 17 METex14 NSCLC patients. Of 24 patients evaluable for safety, 2 (8.3%) experienced grades ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (70.8%), vomiting (29.2%), and diarrhea (33.3%). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 0% (0/24) of patients. Peripheral edema was observed in 29.2% (grade 1-2) and there was no grade 3 or greater event in all safety evaluable populations, and 17.6% (grade 1-2) and 0% (grade 3) in METex14 NSCLC population. For the 17 METex14 NSCLC patients, one was not evaluable because the patient did not had the first tumor assessment at the time of DCO. The median age is 69 (41-81) and 70.6% were male, with 1 (0-3) as the median prior lines of treatment. 41.2% of 17 patients were ex-smoker and 58.8% were non-smoker. All patients were MET inhibitor naïve. The objective response rate was 56.2% (9/16) in the evaluable population. Overall (n = 9), 66.7% is treatment-naïve patients (n = 6). The median duration of treatment was 5.4 months for all who dosed 800 mg QD as of the data cut-off on July 6, 2023. At the time of DCO, data is not mature enough for PFS and DoR. Conclusions: ABN401 has shown promise in antitumor efficacy and favorable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14 NSCLC. The phase 2 multicenter, open-label trial (NCT05541822) is actively enrolling in the US, South Korea, and Taiwan. Citation Format: Se-Hoon Lee, Ji-Youn Han, Ki Hyeong Lee, Gyeong-Won Lee, Charlotte Lemech, Michael Millward, Aflah Roohullah, Xiuning Le, Keunchil Park, Jun Young Choi, Na Young Kim, Sunyhe Im, Nirmal Rajasekaran, Kyung Eui Park, Sangsuk Lee, Hanlim Moon, Sunjin Hwang, YoungKee Shin, Dae Ho Lee. Efficacy and safety outcomes of ABN401 in NSCLC patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping: A clinically relevant subgroup analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B042.

Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Patients with HbE/β-Thalassemia from the BELIEVE Study: A Subgroup Analysis

Background: Thalassemias are a group of inherited blood disorders caused by impaired production of the globin chains of hemoglobin (Hb), resulting in anemia. HbE/β-thalassemia results from the co-inheritance of a specific point mutation in the β-globin gene with a second β-thalassemia mutation. The combination of mutations influences disease severity, ranging from mild to severe, with HbE/β-thalassemia accounting for about half of all cases of severe thalassemia. Patients (pts) with severe disease have higher red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements, which can be associated with increased risk of related morbidities. Treatments that can reduce dependence on RBC transfusions are needed to improve pt outcomes. Primary results from the BELIEVE study (NCT02604433) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of luspatercept to treat anemia in transfusion-dependent pts with β-thalassemia across genotypes including HbE (Cappellini MD, et al. HemaSphere 2020;4[S1]:108-109). A subsequent analysis of the final BELIEVE data for pts with β 0/β 0 mutations, a form of severe β-thalassemia, demonstrated similar results with longer treatment in this subgroup (Sheth S, et al. Blood 2022;140 [S1]:1946-1948). The aim of this post hoc sub-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of longer-term luspatercept treatment in pts in the BELIEVE trial with HbE/β-thalassemia. Methods: The BELIEVE trial included adult pts with β-thalassemia or HbE/β-thalassemia (compound heterozygous β-thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of α-globin genes allowed) who required regular RBC transfusions (6-20 RBC units in the 24 wk before randomization with no transfusion-free period &amp;gt; 35 days). Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive luspatercept (1.0-1.25 mg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously every 3 wk and evaluated for response (defined as reduction in RBC transfusion burden ≥ 33% or ≥ 50% from baseline during any 12-wk interval over the entire study) and safety. Data were evaluated up to the final pt visit (Jan 5, 2021). Results: The BELIEVE trial enrolled 336 pts, 52 (15.5%) of whom had HbE/β-thalassemia; 31 were randomized to the luspatercept group of the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population (13.8%; N = 224). At baseline, pts receiving luspatercept with HbE/β-thalassemia were similar in age compared with the overall ITT population (median 32 y vs 30 y, respectively) and had similar transfusion burden (median 13.0 units vs 14.0 units over 24 wk), but had higher median fetal Hb (6.1% vs 5.1%), higher median serum ferritin (2087.0 vs 1441.3 μg/L), and higher median liver iron content (10.8 vs 6.1 mg/g dry weight). The median (range) duration of luspatercept treatment for pts with HbE/β-thalassemia was similar to the overall ITT population (157.7 [51.0-207.1] wk vs 153.6 [1.7-215.0] wk). A similar proportion of pts with HbE/β-thalassemia as in the overall ITT population achieved ≥ 33% reduction in transfusion burden (83.9% vs 77.2%) and ≥ 50% reduction in transfusion burden (61.3% vs 50.0%) over any 12-wk interval with luspatercept treatment (Figure A). Median total duration of ≥ 33% reduction in transfusion burden response was longer for HbE/β-thalassemia pts versus the overall ITT population (722.0 days vs 586.0 days). In the HbE/β-thalassemia subgroup, 67.6% of pts experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) related to treatment versus 60.5% of pts in the overall luspatercept safety population. The proportion of pts experiencing grade ≥ 3 treatment-related TEAEs was 25.8% in the HbE/β-thalassemia subgroup and 12.1% in the overall safety population. Treatment-related TEAEs resulted in discontinuation of luspatercept in 6.5% and 9.0% of the HbE/β-thalassemia and overall safety populations, respectively. No treatment-related TEAEs resulted in death in either group (Figure B). Summary: The HbE/β-thalassemia sub-group of the BELIEVE study had rates of response that were consistent with the larger ITT population. Furthermore, pts with HbE/β-thalassemia experienced a longer median total duration of response compared with the overall ITT population with a similar safety profile. Additional evaluation of the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in a larger population of HbE/β-thalassemia pts would be valuable as the number of pts in this sub-analysis was small, yet these results suggest that luspatercept is as safe and effective for this subgroup of pts as for the wider β-thalassemia population.

Efficacy and Safety of Golcadomide, a Novel Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator (CELMoD) Agent, Combined with Rituximab in a Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Introduction: Golcadomide is a novel, oral, small-molecule CELMoD ® agent that co-opts cereblon to induce targeted degradation of the transcription factors Ikaros/Aiolos, which are crucial to B-cell malignancy development. We previously reported promising efficacy with a predictable and manageable safety profile of golcadomide in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Michot et al. ICML 2023, presentation #90). Methods: CC-99282-NHL-001 (NCT03930953) is a 2-part, multicenter, first-in-human study with dose escalation (Part A) of golcadomide monotherapy and expansion (Part B) ± combination partners. Patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or R/R follicular lymphoma and disease progression after ≥ 2 lines of therapy or transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL after ≥ 1 line of therapy were included. Following dose exploration in Part A, golcadomide was administered at 0.2 or 0.4 mg alone or with rituximab on 2 intermittent schedules in Part B. Total duration of treatment is up to 2 years. Here, we report efficacy and safety results for golcadomide + rituximab in patients with DLBCL treated in Part B expansion on a 14 days on/14 days off schedule. The efficacy-evaluable population consisted of patients completing ≥ 1 cycle of golcadomide (taking ≥ 75% of assigned doses) and having baseline and ≥ 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Results: As of May 10, 2023, 35 patients with DLBCL were enrolled and 34 received ≥ 1 dose of golcadomide or rituximab (safety population); 17 (49%) patients were ongoing and 17 (49%) had discontinued treatment, mostly due to progressive disease (n = 10, 29%). The median age was 60 years (range, 35-80). The median number of prior anticancer therapies was 4.5 (range, 1-11); 68% (n/N = 23/34) of patients had prior CAR T-cell therapy and 49% (n/N = 17/35) were refractory to their last regimen. Golcadomide median treatment duration was 8 weeks (range, 4-48) and median follow up was 15 weeks (range, 2-55). In the efficacy-evaluable population (n = 16), overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response) was 50% (n = 8), with CR occurring in 13% (n = 2) of patients. Median duration of response was 17.4 weeks (range, 7.4-45.9). Response data in the 0.2-mg and 0.4-mg golcadomide-treated groups are shown in the table. In the safety population (n = 34), neutropenia was the most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), occurring in 15 (44%) patients, all of which were grade 3/4. No febrile neutropenia occurred. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) for golcadomide was neutropenia (all grade 3/4), occurring in 14 (41%) patients, comprising 5/19 (26%) patients treated at the 0.2-mg and 9/15 (60%) patients treated at the 0.4-mg dose level. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used in 14 (41%) patients. Six serious TRAEs related to golcadomide were reported (n = 1 each), all in the 0.4-mg group. One grade 5 TEAE occurred (tubulo-interstitial nephritis in the 0.2-mg group), which was reported to be due to progressive disease and considered unrelated to study treatment. TEAEs led to golcadomide discontinuation in 2 (6%) patients (1 at each dose level) and rituximab discontinuation in 5 (15%) patients. Similar pharmacokinetic (PK) exposures of golcadomide were observed when golcadomide was dosed alone and in combination with rituximab, indicating no apparent impact of rituximab on golcadomide PK. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA data is underway and will be presented. Conclusions: Golcadomide oral therapy combined with rituximab showed promising efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL, including 1 durable response over 300 days. Golcadomide can be safely combined with rituximab, and the combination showed a safety profile similar to that previously reported for golcadomide monotherapy. This study is ongoing, with continued enrolment in the monotherapy and golcadomide + rituximab combination expansion cohorts.