Safety Of Ziprasidone Research Articles

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ziprasidone and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods According to the digital table,64 patients with schizophrenia were randomly divided into the two groups, 32 cases in each group. The control group was given risperidone for treatment, while the observation group was given ziprasidone for treatment. The clinical efficacy was assessed by using the positive and negative symptom scale(PANSS), and adverse events were observed. Results The total effective rates of the control group and the observation group were 84.38% and 87.50%, there was no significant difference between the two groups(χ2= 2.66,P> 0.05); The PANSS score and each factor score of the two groups after treatment decreased significantly than before treatment(t= 8.11,7.86,7.72,7.90,6.77,6.58,7.52,7.40,all P 0.05); The incidence rate of adverse reaction of the observation group was 18.75%, which was significantly lower than 40.63% of the control group(χ2= 8.66,P< 0.05). Conclusion Ziprasidone has therapeutic equivalence with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia, with less adverse reaction, high security, it has good clinical application value. Key words: Schizophrenia; Ziprasidone; Risperidone

The observation of adverse reactions of Ziprasidone in the treatment of 32 cases of female schizophrenia

Objective To discuss the safety of Ziprasidone in female schizophrenia patients.Methods 32 cases of female schizophrenia were treated with Ziprasidone for 6 weeks.Laboratory examination and ECG examination were carried out before and 2,4,6 weeks after treatment.Investigated the influence of Ziprasidone on lipid,blood glucose,body weight and ECG in female schizophrenia patients.Results The levels of triglyceride,cholesterol and body weight of female schizophrenia patients after treatment significantly rose than those before treatment,with statistical significant differences (P ＜ 0.05); QT and QTC interval 4 weeks after treatment significantly prolonged,with statistical significant differences (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Ziprasidone has influence on serum lipid,body weight and QT interval in female schizophrenic patients,but not on blood glucose. Key words: Ziprasidone; Schizophrenia; Blood glucose; ECG; Serum lipid; Body weight

Efficacy, Long-Term Safety, and Tolerability of Ziprasidone in Children and Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in children and adolescents with bipolar I disorder. Subjects 10-17 years of age with a manic or mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder participated in a 4 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial (RCT) followed by a 26 week open-label extension study (OLE). Subjects were randomized 2:1 to initially receive flexible-dose ziprasidone (40-160 mg/day, based on weight) or placebo. Primary outcome was the change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores from baseline. Safety assessments included weight and body mass index (BMI), adverse events (AEs), vital signs, laboratory measures, electrocardiograms, and movement disorder ratings. In the RCT, 237 subjects were treated with ziprasidone (n=149; mean age, 13.6 years) or placebo (n=88; mean age, 13.7 years). The estimated least squares mean changes in YMRS total (intent-to-treat population) were -13.83 (ziprasidone) and -8.61 (placebo; p=0.0005) at RCT endpoint. The most common AEs in the ziprasidone group were sedation (32.9%), somnolence (24.8%), headache (22.1%), fatigue (15.4%), and nausea (14.1%). In the OLE, 162 subjects were enrolled, and the median duration of treatment was 98 days. The mean change in YMRS score from the end of the RCT to the end of the OLE (last observation carried forward) was -3.3 (95% confidence interval, -5.0 to -1.6). The most common AEs were sedation (26.5%), somnolence (23.5%), headache (22.2%), and insomnia (13.6%). For both the RCT and the OLE, no clinically significant mean changes in movement disorder scales, BMI z-scores, liver enzymes, or fasting lipids and glucose were observed. One subject on ziprasidone in the RCT and none during the OLE had Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) ≥ 460 ms. These results demonstrate that ziprasidone is efficacious for treating children and adolescents with bipolar disorder. Ziprasidone was generally well tolerated with a neutral metabolic profile. NCT00257166 and NCT00265330 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Evidence review and clinical guidance for the use of ziprasidone in Canada.

While indicated for schizophrenia and acute mania, ziprasidone’s evidence base and use in clinical practice extends beyond these regulatory approvals. We, an invited panel of experts led by a working group of 3, critically examined the evidence and our collective experience regarding the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of ziprasidone across its clinical uses. There was no opportunity for manufacturer input into the content of the review. As anticipated, ziprasidone was found to be effective for its indicated uses, although its utility in mania and mixed states lacked comparative data. Beyond these uses, the available data were either unimpressive or were lacking. An attractive characteristic is its neutral effect on weight thereby providing patients with a non-obesogenic long-term treatment option. Key challenges in practice include the need for dosing on a full stomach and managing its early onset adverse effect of restlessness. Addressing these issues are critical to its long-term success

Efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in the treatment of first-episode psychosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in first-episode psychosis. This was an 8-week, open-label, multicenter trial. In total, 27 patients (14 male patients, 13 female patients) with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fourth Edition diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, or psychotic disorder not otherwise specified comprised the study population. The initial recommended dose of ziprasidone was 40 mg/day. Within the first 2 weeks, the dose could be increased to 120-160 mg/day depending on the patient's condition. The primary outcome variables were scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale; secondary measures included the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and others. To assess safety, we measured drug-related adverse events, weight, lipid variables, prolactin, and corrected QT (QTc) interval. Among the 27 enrolled participants, 16 dropped out [lack of efficacy (n = 7), loss to follow-up (n = 7), withdrawn consent (n = 1), and serious adverse event (n = 1)]. The mean total daily and endpoint doses of ziprasidone were 120.30 ± 40.34 and 131.85 ± 51.22 mg/day, respectively. The administration of ziprasidone resulted in significant improvement in the PANSS (P < 0.0001) and CGI scores (P < 0.0001) over time. Significant improvement in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia score (P < 0.0001) was also observed at week 8. The response rate (defined as a 30% or greater decrease in the PANSS total score from baseline to last observation) was 51.85%. No significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms rating scale scores, and lipid and prolactin levels from baseline to last observation were found. However, modest side effects regarding the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and hyperprolactinemia, and weight change from baseline in male patients were observed. These results indicate that ziprasidone is effective in the treatment of the positive, negative, and depressive symptoms of first-episode psychosis and has a modest side-effect burden.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Ziprasidone vs. Olanzapine in Naive First-Episode Schizophrenia: A 6-Week, Randomized, Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Study

Although some previous studies have compared the 2 medicines, ziprasidone and olanzapine most selected chronic patients as subjects. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone vs. olanzapine in naive first-episode schizophrenia. 80 patients were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment either with 80-160 mg/day of ziprasidone or 10-20 mg/day of olanzapine. The primary efficacy measurements were the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression-severity scale scores. The second efficacy measurement was the response rate of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. 79 patients completed the trial. The average dose was 127.5 mg/day with ziprasidone and 19.1 mg/day with olanzapine. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in primary or secondary efficacy measurements at each visit point (all p>0.05). Body weight significantly increased with olanzapine, and more extrapyramidal symptoms were observed with ziprasidone (all p<0.05). Both medicines were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed. Ziprasidone was as effective as olanzapine in short-term treatment for first-episode schizophrenia, and both medicines were well tolerated.

Autism and Sleep: Basics for the Clinician

the QTc. The purpose of this study was to collect pilot data on the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in adolescents with autism, focusing on safety issues of weight gain and QTc. Methods: Twelve adolescents with autism (mean age 14.5 +/1.8 years) were treated in a 6-week open pilot study. Ziprasidone dosage ranged from 20 to 160 mg/day (mean, 98.3 +/40.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy measure was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement item (CGI-I); other efficacy measures included the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and the Children’s Psychiatric Rating Scale. Results: Based on the CGI-I, 9 of 12 (75%) patients were treatment responders. Ziprasidone was weight neutral, and the QTc increased by a mean of 14.7 msec. Two subjects had acute dystonic reactions. Cholesterol decreased and prolactin remained the same.

A Comparison of Ziprasidone and Risperidone in the Long-Term Treatment of Schizophrenia: A 44-Week, Double-Blind, Continuation Study

This randomized, double-blind, multicentre extension study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of ziprasidone and risperidone for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients who had responded to treatment for an acute exacerbation of illness in an 8-week study received ziprasidone, 80 to 160 mg/day (n = 62), or risperidone, 6 to 10 mg/day (n = 77), for up to 44 additional weeks. Primary efficacy variables included changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) score. Tolerability and safety assessments included movement disorders, adverse events, study discontinuation rates, and weight and metabolic parameters. Both the ziprasidone and risperidone groups showed statistical improvement from baseline in PANSS and CGI-S scores at study end point with no significant differences between treatment groups. More risperidone-treated patients completed the study (41.6%) than ziprasidone-treated patients (33.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Ziprasidone-treated patients who completed the study showed greater improvement in depressive symptoms assessed by Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale than risperidone-treated patients (P < 0.05). Ziprasidone was associated with a more favourable effect on extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) measures and prolactin as well as less weight gain than risperidone. Median dosages were ziprasidone 120 mg/day and risperidone 8 mg/day. Ziprasidone and risperidone demonstrated similar efficacy during long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. While more subjects on risperidone completed the extension study, ziprasidone was associated with fewer adverse effects on weight, EPS measures, and prolactin than risperidone.

Ziprasidone in the treatment of mania in bipolar disorder

Ziprasidone is an atypical antipsychotic with a unique receptor-binding profile. Currently, ziprasidone is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the acute treatment of psychosis in schizophrenia and mania in bipolar disorder. When compared to certain other atypical antipsychotics, ziprasidone appears to have a relatively benign side effect profile, especially as regards metabolic effects eg, weight gain, serum lipid elevations and glucose dysregulation. Taken together, these data suggest that ziprasidone may be a first line treatment for patients with bipolar mania. However, ziprasidone is a relatively new medication for which adverse events after long-term use and/or in vulnerable patient populations must be studied. Unstudied areas of particular importance include the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in the treatment of bipolar depression and relapse prevention of mania as, well as in the subpopulations of pregnant women, the elderly and pediatric patients. The emergence of mania in patients taking ziprasidone is another topic for further study.

Ziprasidone in Adolescents with Autism: An Open-Label Pilot Study

The antipsychotic drugs are the best-studied agents shown to reduce symptoms in autism, including hyperactivity, aggression, self-abusive behavior, temper tantrums, lability, irritability, social withdrawal, and stereotypical behaviors. However, significant weight gain has been associated with use of many atypical agents. Ziprasidone has been weight neutral in adult populations, but data from adolescents and patients with autism are sparse. However, ziprasidone administration has been associated with increases in the QTc. The purpose of this study was to collect pilot data on the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in adolescents with autism, focusing on safety issues of weight gain and QTc. Twelve adolescents with autism (mean age 14.5 +/- 1.8 years) were treated in a 6-week open pilot study. Ziprasidone dosage ranged from 20 to 160 mg/day (mean, 98.3 +/- 40.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy measure was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement item (CGI-I); other efficacy measures included the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and the Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale. Based on the CGI-I, 9 of 12 (75%) patients were treatment responders. Ziprasidone was weight neutral, and the QTc increased by a mean of 14.7 msec. Two subjects had acute dystonic reactions. Cholesterol decreased and prolactin remained the same. Ziprasidone shows promise as a treatment for adolescents with autism. More definitive trials are needed.

Comparison of ziprasidone and aripiprazole in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, 4-week study

We compared the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone and aripiprazole in the treatment of acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day), or aripiprazole (10-30 mg/day) for up to 4 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were the Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale (CGI-S) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) total (derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale). Noninferiority for ziprasidone (N=125) relative to aripiprazole (N=128) was established for CGI-S score (P=0.007), but was not confirmed for BPRSd total score (P=0.248). Effect sizes for within-group improvement, however, were robust for both ziprasidone and aripiprazole (effect size range 1.0-1.1 for CGI-S; and range 1.1-1.2 for BPRSd total). A mixed model repeated measures analysis of BPRSd total score favored ziprasidone at day 4 compared with aripiprazole (P=0.04), with no significant differences between treatment groups at other visits (P=0.001 for interaction between treatment and visit). No statistically significant difference was found in CGI-S score between groups across all visits. Our findings suggest that ziprasidone and aripiprazole exhibit similar efficacy and tolerability profiles in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Differences between the two drugs in the onset of therapeutic effect warrant further investigation.

Effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ziprasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: Results of a multi-centre observational trial

Purpose The ZEISIG study (Ziprasidone Experience in Schizophrenia in Germany/Austria) investigated the effectiveness of ziprasidone as measured by discontinuation rates and mean changes of the BPRS total. Secondary objectives included quality of life, subjective well-being, tolerability, and safety. Subjects and methods Two hundred and seventy-six subjects with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were treated within an open-label, 12-week, prospective, flexible-dose observational trial of ziprasidone (40–160 mg/day). Baseline and outcome assessments mainly included Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), Short-Form 12 (SF-12), and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic treatment (SWN-K). Results Study discontinuation due to any cause was evident in 58% of subjects, most of them within the first 4 weeks after study initiation. In study completers, ziprasidone was associated with improvements in BPRS total (44.8 to 33.6; p < 0.001), CGI, SF-12, and SWN-K total scores (80.5 to 89.5). Ziprasidone was related to reduction of weight, fasting glucose, and serum lipids. No cardiovascular adverse event or significant increase of the QTc interval was observed. Discussion and conclusion Approximately 60% of subjects discontinued ziprasidone prematurely, probably related to an initial and overall underdose. The present study confirmed previous tolerability and safety data of ziprasidone as well as results of its effectiveness. Independent from reason to switch, previous antipsychotic class, and severity of illness at baseline, the recommended starting dose of 80 mg/day as well as the maximum treatment dose of 160 mg/day may not be sufficient for a selected subgroup of patients.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ziprasidone in Children and Adolescents

The purpose of this study was to provide single-dose pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability data for ziprasidone in youths with tic disorder, for comparison to adult studies to discern whether ziprasidone pediatric dosing could be modeled from adult data. A single-dose, open-label study of ziprasidone was conducted in youths (ages 7-16 years) with Tourette's disorder or chronic tic disorder. Dosing of ziprasidone oral suspension (40 mg/mL) was weight adjusted: >60 kg, 20 mg (group 1, n = 8); 31 to 60 kg, 10 mg (group 2, n = 8); and 16 to 30 kg, 5 mg (group 3, n = 8). Patients were assessed for serum ziprasidone concentration, safety, tolerability, and electrocardiogram pre- and postdose. Twenty-four patients were evaluated for safety and tolerability, and 23 were evaluated for pharmacokinetics. Regression analysis of AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values versus weight-normalized dose showed linear, dose-related changes in ziprasidone exposure. Ziprasidone was well tolerated with frequent, although transient, somnolence. No clinically significant change from baseline was observed in Bazett's or Fridericia's corrected QT(c) interval, and change in QT(c) interval was not related to serum ziprasidone concentration. Oral ziprasidone exhibited linear pharmacokinetics and dose-related exposure in youths with Tourette's disorder or chronic tic disorder, which are comparable to adult data. A single dose of ziprasidone was well tolerated without clinically significant effects on electrocardiograms collected around the time of maximum serum concentration.

P.3.a.019 Efficacy and safety of ziprasidone and clozapine in treatment refractory schizophrenic patients:results of a randomized, double-blind, 18-week trial

Composition of Indian Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii) venom, a medically important snake and member of “Big Four” snakes of India was done by gel filtration chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry. The MS/MS analyses of tryptic digested gel filtration peaks divulged the presence of 63 different proteins belonging to 12 families. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2), serine proteases, metalloproteases, cysteine-rich secretory proteins, l-amino acid oxidase, C-type lectin-like proteins, kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor, disintegrin, nucleotidase, phosphodiesterase, vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular nerve growth factor families were identified. PLA2 enzymes with isoforms of N-, S- and H-type based on their first N-terminal amino acid residue were observed. The venom is also found to be rich in RVV-X, RVV-V and thrombin-like enzymes. Homologues of disintegrins with RGD and RTS motifs were also observed. The high percentage of PLA2 and proteases in the venom proteome could be responsible for the observed coagulopathy, haemorrhage and edema which can be correlated with the clinical manifestations of Russell's viper envenomation. This is the first proteomic analysis of Indian D. russelii venom which might assist in understanding the pathophysiological effects of viper envenomation. Such study will also be important for developing more effective antivenom for viper bite management.

From Clinical Research to Clinical Practice: A 4-Year Review of Ziprasidone

Ziprasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic that received Food and Drug Administration approval in February 2001. It has a unique receptor profile that includes high-affinity antagonist activity at dopamine D2 receptors, inverse agonist activity at serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors, agonist activity at 5-HTlA receptors, and a relatively high affinity for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporters. The 5-HTIA affinity, together with the inhibitory effect on mono-amine reuptake, may underlie the hypothesized beneficial effects on comorbid affective and cognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The short-term efficacy of ziprasidone for core positive symptoms of schizophrenia appears to be comparable to other conventional and atypical antipsychotics. The short-term efficacy of ziprasidone in acute mania has been established based on two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.Open-label treatment for up to 52 weeks confirms the sustained efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in bipolar disorder. Maintenance studies in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder indicate that long-term ziprasidone therapy is effective in preventing relapse, while maintaining cognitive and psychosocial benefits. The safety database suggests that the overall cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk associated with ziprasidone is lower than with other atypicals, with notably lower risk of drug-related increases in weight, glucose, or lipids. The data also suggest a modestly increased risk of QTc prolongation that is not dose related or linked to torsades de pointes. Switching to ziprasidone from other atypicals appears to improve both clinical symptoms and metabolic parameters, though more studies are needed to fully characterize these benefits. This monograph summarizes the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar mania.

Expert Canadian consensus suggestions on the rational, clinical use of ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders.

Many atypical antipsychotic medications are becoming available for clinical use. Ziprasidone is a recent addition to this group and is expected to become available for clinical use in Canada in 2005. Ziprasidone has some significant differences compared with other atypicals currently available in Canada. Clinicians need to understand the benefits and risks associated with each of the antipsychotic medications available for the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders to ensure their most appropriate utilization. At the suggestion of Professor Stan Kutcher (chair) and as part of an ongoing commitment to provide independent education pertaining to the utility of new psychotropic compounds to health professionals, a panel of Canadian experts in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was convened to provide consensus suggestions for the appropriate clinical use of ziprasidone. The consultations regarding the development of these recommendations were organized by Brainworks International (BWI) with arms-length funding from Pfizer Canada. This paper describes the experts' consensus views on the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone, their suggestions on which patients may be suitable for ziprasidone treatment, and how to initiate treatment (including how to switch from other antipsychotic medications), manage side effects, and monitor patients in long-term therapy. These suggestions are those of the authors only and are not endorsed by or necessarily reflect the opinions of BWI or Pfizer Canada.

The efficacy and safety of ziprasidone 80 mg/day and 160mg/day in schizophrenia and schizoaffecfive disorder

Ziprasidone's high affinity for SHT1A and moderate affinity for D1 receptors suggest significant antipsychotic efficacy with low extrapyramidal side-effect (EPS) liability. This 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety ofziprasidone in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. After a 3-7 day washout, patients received either ziprasidone 40 mg bid (n= 106); ziprasidone 40 mg bid on days 1-2 then 80 mg bid (n= 104); or placebo (n=92). Both 80 mg and 160 mg/day ziprasidone significantly improved Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), BPRSd Core Items, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity, and PANSS Total scores compared with placebo. Improvements in negative symptoms (PANSS Negative Subscale) were significantly greater and improvements in MADRS also greater with both ziprasidone doses compared with placebo. Notable was the low incidence of EPS, akathisia and sexual dysfunction associated with ziprasidone. Discontinuations due to adverse events were infrequent and similar among groups (4.7-9.6%). The results of this study indicate that ziprasidone is an effective and well tolerated antipsychotic, improving positive, negative and affective symptoms without an undue side-effect burden. • The authors thank the Ziprasidone Study Group for participation in this study.