Safety Of Statins Research Articles

Efficacy and diabetes risk of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin after percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundsHigh-intensity statin is recommended for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and ezetimibe is recommended to be added in patients not achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe can reduce LDL-C levels similar to high-intensity statin. The aim of this study is to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe as the first-line strategy compared to high-intensity statin in patients undergoing PCI.MethodData was obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea. Patients who underwent PCI from 2012 to 2017 were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, revascularization, or ischemic stroke. The safety endpoint was new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM).ResultsA total of 45,501 patients received high-intensity statin (n = 38,340) or moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (n = 7,161). Among propensity-score-matched 7,161 pairs, MACCEs occurred in 1,460 patients with high-intensity statin and 1,406 patients with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (33.8% vs. 31.9%, hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.89–1.03, P = 0.27) at a median follow-up of 2.7 years. DM was newly diagnosed in 398 patients with high-intensity statin and 342 patients with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (12.5% vs. 10.7%; hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.73–0.97, P = 0.02).ConclusionIn patients undergoing PCI, moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe demonstrated a similar risk of MACCEs but a lower risk of new-onset DM than high-intensity statin. Early combination treatment of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe may be a useful and safe lipid-lowering strategy after PCI.Graphical abstractCumulative incidence according to the first-line lipid-lowering strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Abbreviation: MACCE, major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Long-Term Benefits and Safety of Statins in Patients with Kidney Failure: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Patients with kidney failure are at elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases. Although statins were commonly used to mitigate cardiovascular disease risk among the population with high risk, the evidence for initiating statin therapy among patients with kidney failure remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefits and risks associated with statin therapy in patients with kidney failure. Using territory-wide public electronic health records in Hong Kong, 3,019 statin-eligible individuals with kidney failure and elevated LDL cholesterol ≥ 100 mg/dL from Jan 2008 to Dec 2015 were included for analysis. The framework of target trial emulation was adopted to investigate the risk of the major cardiovascular diseases (i.e., a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke), all-cause mortality, as well as the major adverse events (i.e., myopathies and liver dysfunction) between statin initiators and statin non-initiators. The pooled logistic model was used to obtain the hazard ratio (HRs) for the outcomes of interest in both intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Significant risk reduction associated with statin therapy (HR [95%CI]) was observed for major cardiovascular diseases (ITT: 0.78 [0.62, 0.98]; PP: 0.66 [0.50, 0.87]) and all-cause mortality (ITT: 0.80 [0.68, 0.95]; PP: 0.60 [0.48, 0.76]). The standardised 5-year and 10-year absolute risk reduction in per-protocol analysis was 7% (3%, 11%) and 11% (4%, 18%), respectively. No significant risks for the major adverse events were observed. Statin therapy was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in patients with kidney failure without a higher risk of major adverse events.

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), affects approximately 18.6 million individuals worldwide, poses an important healthcare challenge. Despite the established efficacy of both high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) and moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) in ASCVD management, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. Purpose This meta-analysis seeks to assess the impact of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) versus high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) on LDL < 70mg/dl; Total Cholesterol; LDL; High Density Cholesterol (HDL) and triglycerides levels. Our goal is to synthesize the existing evidence and pinpoint areas that warrant further investigation. Methods A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe with high-intensity statin monotherapy in ASCVD patients. Results In the 13 included studies, involving 8,592 patients, of which 4,525 (52.67%) received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe treatment. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 219 weeks, with participant ages varying from 66 to 76.5 years in the MIS+EZT group and from 67 to 75.9 years in the HIS group. Analysis revealed significant MIS+EZT-associated with greater percentages in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) < 70 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.76; 95% CI [1.26; 2.45]; p=0.001; I²=73%), LDL reduction (Mean Difference (MD) -5.05 mg/dL; 95% CI [-9.02;-1.07]; p<0.013; I²=56%;); Total Cholesterol reduction (MD -7.91 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-14.90; -0.91]; p<0.027; I²=60%); Triglycerides reduction (MD -8.20 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-13.05; -3.35]; p<0.001; I²=2%;); There was no statistical difference between groups in Drug Adverse reaction (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.19; 95% CI [0.79; 1.78]; p=0.404; I²=0%); and Drug intolerance (RR 0.78 ; 95% CI [0.32; 1.92]; p=0.584; I²=35%). Conclusions This meta-analysis underscores the effectiveness of MIS+EZT in enhancing significant clinical outcomes for ASCVD patients, as evidenced by improvements in a greater percentage of patients achieved the LDL <70 target, LDL, Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides levels . Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrophilic Versus Lipophilic Statins in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

Statins differ in their solubility. Some previous studies suggested a difference in clinical efficacy and adverse events between hydrophilic and lipophilic statins. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and Scopus were systemically searched for articles published from inception until the 18th of July 2024. The primary outcome included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), while the secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina (UA), revascularization, stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths, and adverse events. The results were pooled as risk ratio (RR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Nine studies were included. Hydrophilic statins showed a significantly higher risk of MACE and UA compared to lipophilic statins (RR 1.11 [95% CI 1.02, 1.21] and 1.30 [95% CI 1.04, 1.62]), but subgroup analysis showed a lack of significant difference between statins of similar intensity (1.01 [95% CI 0.86, 1.18] and 0.98 [0.67, 1.45], respectively). Both statins showed comparable results regarding the occurrence of MI (1.18 [95% CI 0.98, 1.40]), revascularization (1.09 [95% CI 0.99, 1.20]), stroke (1.16 [95% CI 0.80, 1.66]), all-cause mortality (1.13 [95% CI 0.92, 1.38]), cardiovascular deaths (1.14 [95% CI 0.76, 1.72]), adverse events leading to discontinuation (1.03 [95% CI 0.56,1.90]), increased alanine aminotransferase (0.61 [95% CI 0.32, 1.16]), increased creatine kinase (0.90 [95% CI 0.30, 2.72]), and increased serum creatinine (1.03 [95% CI 0.49, 2.19]). The efficacy and safety of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins are comparable when the cholesterol-lowering intensity of statins is similar. This suggests that intensity, rather than the lipophilicity of the statin, plays a more important role in the secondary prevention of MACE and individual adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of statins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe therapies for children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: Systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

Background and aimsStatins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe combination therapy are recommended lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH). However, their relative effectiveness is not well understood. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of these therapies using direct and indirect comparisons. MethodsWe conducted systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMAs) of randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of statins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe combination therapy in people <18 years with HeFH. Comprehensive bibliographic searches were conducted in December 2022, and a Medline update in January 2024. NMA models accounted for drug class, statin type and dosage. ResultsThirteen RCTs were included (n = 1649, median age 13 years, follow-up 6 weeks-2 years). All LLTs reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol; statins led to increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and reductions in triglycerides. Statins reduced LDL-C by 33.61 % against placebo (95 % CI 27.58 to 39.63, I2 = 83 %). Adding ezetimibe to statins reduced LDL-C by an additional 15.85 % (95 % CI 11.91 to 19.79). NMAs showed intermediate-dose statins reduced LDL-C by an additional 4.77 % compared with lower-doses statins (95 % CrI −11.22 to 1.05); higher-dose statins and intermediate-dose statins + ezetimibe may be similarly effective and are probably superior to ezetimibe, intermediate-and lower-dose statins. There was no evidence of differences in maturation, safety or tolerability between LLTs and placebo. ConclusionsStatins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe are all effective treatments for children with HeFH, but the magnitude of LDL-C reductions varies and may depend on treatment dosage and combination. No safety or tolerability issues were found. Longer-term safety and effectiveness are uncertain.

Determining the role of statins in Parkinson's disease risk reduction and disease modification: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 4 million participants' data.

Many observational studies have examined the association between statins and the incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD) in high-risk populations. On the other hand, clinical trials as well as other observational studies investigated the safety and efficacy of statins in slowing disease progression in PD patients. However, the evidence has been inconclusive in both questions. To that end, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize evidence on the role of statins in decreasing the risk of PD among high-risk populations and as a possible disease-modifying agent for patients with PD. A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science has been performed. Relevant studies were chosen and data were extracted and analyzed using RevMan software version 5.4.1. Twenty-five studies (14 cohort, 9 case-control, and 2 randomized controlled trials) have been included in the present systematic review. Of them, 21 studies reported the association between statins and PD risk. Statins were found to significantly reduce the risk of developing PD (pooled RR 0.86, 95% CI [0.77-0.95], p < 0.005). Four studies investigated statins as a disease-modifying agent. The pooled mean difference (MD) in the UPDRS-III from baseline to endpoint did not differ significantly between the statin and control groups (MD -1.34 points, 95% CI [-3.81 to 1.14], p = 0.29). Although epidemiological observational studies showed that statin use was associated with a reduced risk of PD, current evidence is insufficient to support the role of statins in slowing the progression of PD. These findings are limited by the fact that most of the included studies are observational studies which carry a high risk of confounding bias which highlights the need for future well-designed RCTs.

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Intensive Versus Moderate Statin-Based Therapies in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Statins are widely used for treating patients with ischemic stroke at risk of secondary cerebrovascular events. It is unknown whether Asian populations benefit from more intensive statin-based therapy for stroke recurrence. Therefore, in the present study we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of high-dose and moderate-dose statins for patients who had experienced mild ischemic stroke during the acute period. This multicenter prospective study included patients with mild ischemic stroke who presented within 72 hours of symptom onset. The outcomes of patients in the high-intensity and moderate-intensity statin treatment groups were compared, with the main efficacy outcome being stroke recurrence and the primary safety end point being intracranial hemorrhage. The propensity score matching method was employed to control for imbalances in baseline variables. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences. In total, the data of 2950 patients were analyzed at 3 months, and the data of 2764 patients were analyzed at 12 months due to loss to follow-up. According to the multivariable Cox analyses adjusted for potential confounders, stroke recurrence occurred similarly in the high-intensity statin and moderate-intensity statin groups (3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85-1.49]; P=0.424; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.34]; P=0.519). High-intensity statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (3 months: adjusted HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.00-3.25]; P=0.048; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.10-3.16]; P=0.021). The results from the propensity score-matched analyses were consistent with those from the Cox proportional hazards analysis. Compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy, high-dose statin therapy may not decrease the risk of mild, noncardiogenic ischemic stroke recurrence but may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. URL: www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1900025214.

Statins for neuroprotection in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (STATIC): protocol for a multicentre, prospective and randomised controlled trial

IntroductionIntracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a neurological emergency with high morbidity and mortality, and current treatment is limited. Emerging evidence has reported that statins can exert neuroprotective effects in cerebrovascular diseases....

A Systematic Review of Statins for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Safety, Efficacy, and Mechanism of Action.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the liver component of a cluster of conditions, while its subtype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), emerges as a potentially progressive liver disorder that harbors the risk of evolving into cirrhosis and culminating in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NASH and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have common risk factors, but compared to liver-related causes, the most common cause of death in NASH patients is CVD. Within the pharmacological armamentarium, statins, celebrated for their lipid-modulating prowess, have now garnered attention for their expansive therapeutic potential in NASH. Evidence from a plethora of studies suggests that statins not only manifest anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties but also impart a multifaceted beneficial impact on hepatic health. In this review, we used "statin", "NAFLD", "NASH", and "CVD" as the major keywords and conducted a literature search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases to determine the safety and efficacy of statins in patients and animals with NASH and NAFLD, and the mechanism of statin therapy for NASH. Simultaneously, we reviewed the important role of the intestinal microbiota in statin therapy for NASH, as it is hoped that statins will provide new insights into modulating the harmful inflammatory microbiota in the gut and reducing systemic inflammation in NASH patients.

Impact of statins in the liver: A bane or a boon?

Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with statins is considered one of the cornerstones in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Statins exert their hypolipidemic effects by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, the key enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. Beyond cholesterol reduction, statins exhibit pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiproliferative actions, making them valuable in mitigating atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic diseases. Though concerns of hepatotoxicity have been associated with the use of statins, extensive evidence suggests that the risk of statin-induced liver injury (SILI) is rare, with an incidence of &lt;1%. Hepatic adverse effects include reversible asymptomatic transaminase elevation (most frequent), hepatitis, cholestasis, and rarely acute liver failure. While hepatotoxicity concerns should not be dismissed, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the safety of statins. Contrary to the myth of statin hepatotoxicity, real-world data and extensive research emphasize the safety and benefits of statins. They are therapeutic in various liver-related conditions, mainly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This scientific review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of statins, shedding light on their mechanism of action, hepatotoxicity concerns, and therapeutic potential in various liver-related conditions.

Statins-Beyond Their Use in Hypercholesterolemia: Focus on the Pediatric Population.

Statins are a class of medications primarily used in adults to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. However, the use of statins in children is generally limited and carefully considered despite the well-documented anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, and pro-apoptotic effects, as well as their effect on cell signaling pathways. These multifaceted effects, known as pleiotropic effects, encompass enhancements in endothelial function, a significant reduction in oxidative stress, the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, immunomodulation, the inhibition of vascular smooth muscle proliferation, an influence on bone metabolism, anti-inflammatory properties, antithrombotic effects, and a diminished risk of dementia. In children, recent research revealed promising perspectives on the use of statins in various conditions including neurological, cardiovascular, and oncologic diseases, as well as special situations, such as transplanted children. The long-term safety and efficacy of statins in children are still subjects of ongoing research, and healthcare providers carefully assess the individual risk factors and benefits before prescribing these medications to pediatric patients. The use of statins in children is generally less common than in adults, and it requires close monitoring and supervision by healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to fully assess the pleiotropic effects of statins in the pediatric population.

Machine learning-based prediction model for the efficacy and safety of statins.

The appropriate use of statins plays a vital role in reducing the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, due to changes in diet and lifestyle, there has been a significant increase in the number of individuals with high cholesterol levels. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure the rational use of statins. Adverse reactions associated with statins, including liver enzyme abnormalities and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), have impacted their widespread utilization. In this study, we aimed to develop a predictive model for statin efficacy and safety based on real-world clinical data using machine learning techniques. We employed various data preprocessing techniques, such as improved random forest imputation and Borderline SMOTE oversampling, to handle the dataset. Boruta method was utilized for feature selection, and the dataset was divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Five algorithms, including logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting decision tree, were used to construct the predictive models. Ten-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping sampling were performed for internal and external validation. Additionally, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was employed for feature interpretability. Ultimately, an accessible web-based platform for predicting statin efficacy and safety was established based on the optimal predictive model. The random forest algorithm exhibited the best performance among the five algorithms. The predictive models for LDL-C target attainment (AUC = 0.883, Accuracy = 0.868, Precision = 0.858, Recall = 0.863, F1 = 0.860, AUPRC = 0.906, MCC = 0.761), liver enzyme abnormalities (AUC = 0.964, Accuracy = 0.964, Precision = 0.967, Recall = 0.963, F1 = 0.965, AUPRC = 0.978, MCC = 0.938), and muscle pain/Creatine kinase (CK) abnormalities (AUC = 0.981, Accuracy = 0.980, Precision = 0.987, Recall = 0.975, F1 = 0.981, AUPRC = 0.987, MCC = 0.965) demonstrated favorable performance. The most important features of LDL-C target attainment prediction model was cerebral infarction, TG, PLT and HDL. The most important features of liver enzyme abnormalities model was CRP, CK and number of oral medications. Similarly, AST, ALT, PLT and number of oral medications were found to be important features for muscle pain/CK abnormalities. Based on the best-performing predictive model, a user-friendly web application was designed and implemented. This study presented a machine learning-based predictive model for statin efficacy and safety. The platform developed can assist in guiding statin therapy decisions and optimizing treatment strategies. Further research and application of the model are warranted to improve the utilization of statin therapy.

Landscape of Statin as a Cornerstone in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Atherosclerosis, the key pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Statins are first-line lipid-lowering drugs, which have been demonstrated to be powerful agents for anti-atherosclerosis. Numerous studies have confirmed the cardiovascular benefits and long-term safety of statins in a wide range of patients. Statins play an indispensable and irreplaceable part in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this article, we summarize the evolution of statins and their role in the treatment of cholesterol. The anti-atherosclerotic mechanism of statins, its efficacy, safety and clinical outcomes in secondary and primary prevention of ACSVD in different patient populations, the combination treatment effects, and guideline recommendations are also detailed. This paper highlights the profound significance of statins as the most successful anti-atherogenic drug in the cardiovascular field.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Statins in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Statins in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Sex differences in the perception of cardiovascular risk in familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a common genetic condition, is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recent data indicate an undertreatment of females with FH. To characterize the role of sex in the perception of FH, its associated ASCVD risk and treatment. A survey investigating for sex differences in the perception of FH was sent to 1073 patients with FH using a cross sectional study design. A total of 412 patients (51.9 % male) responded to the survey; mean age was 56.2 ± 14.4 years. There was a higher proportion of males with ASCVD than females (41.5 % vs. 16.5 %, respectively, p<0.001). Analyses of the survey responses showed that a majority of both males and females agreed that their risk of ASCVD is higher than healthy individuals of same age (70.8 % vs. 74.7 %, respectively, p = 0.434). Females were more concerned about having high LDL-C levels (67.5 % vs. 56.5 % in males, p = 0.024), especially those in secondary prevention programs. As for treatment of FH, approximately 75 % of both sex groups considered statins to be efficient in reducing the risk of myocardial infarction, but less than half of the females considered statins to be safe (44.8 % vs. 60.0 % in males, p = 0.003). No major sex differences were noted regarding the influence of the doctor in their understanding of FH as a disease. Overall, both males and females with FH were well informed about FH, although females were more concerned about having high LDL-C levels and they feared the safety of statins.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism with Statins: Evidence Gathered via a Network Meta-analysis

Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Studies have shown conflicting results regarding statins ability to reduce the incidence of VTE. To perform a network meta-analysis to determine which lipid-lowering agent was more efficacious in and had more evidence regarding reducing the VTE risk. Network meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs that assessed the effectiveness and safety of statins or fibrates and compared them to a placebo or another statin were eligible for the study. The outcomes examined in the study were deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and/or VTE. We conducted a comprehensive search of the Medline database from 1966 to February 2017, using specific search terms related to VTE and statins. Additionally, we screened, and cross-checked relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the different lipid-lowering agents to each other and the placebo and their effectiveness. Twenty-seven RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis (n = 137,940). Pairwise meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant lower incidence of VTE with statins than with placebos (0.79% vs 0.99%, respectively; risk ratios: 0.87, 0.77-0.98; p = 0.022). Rosuvastatin had the most favorable effect in reducing VTE risk than the other statins, fenofibrate, and placebo. Fenofibrate was ranked the worst drug choice, because it increased risk of VTE when compared with the other statins. Rosuvastatin was the best choice for reducing the VTE risk when compared with the placebo (OR: 0.56, 0.42-0.75), atorvastatin (OR: 0.64, 0.44-0.95), pravastatin (OR: 0.50, 0.34-0.74), simvastatin (OR: 0.60, 0.42-0.86) and fenofibrate (OR: 0.37, 0.25-0.56). Compared with a placebo, rosuvastatin reduced the VTE risk by around 45% and fenofibrate increased the risk by 65%. Rosuvastatin is significantly reduces the risk of VTE when compared with a placebo, other statin subtypes, and fibrate. Furthermore, fenofibrate increased the VTE risk when compared with a placebo and statins.

Pregnancy-related adverse events associated with statins: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

ABSTRACT Background Statins, previously rated as pregnancy category X agents, were contraindicated during pregnancy due to the teratogenic effects observed in animal studies. However, it is still controversial whether statins have detrimental impact on pregnant women or not, and some studies even suggest a potential benefit of statin use against pregnancy complications. The aim of this study was to explore whether maternal exposure to statins is associated with increased rates of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs), including abortion, abortion spontaneous, preterm birth, low birth weight, stillbirth/fetal death, and fetal complications. Research design and methods Data from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2022 were extracted through the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, to conduct disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) algorithms. To identify the potential risks of pregnancy-related AEs, each statin was compared to all the other drugs, all the other statins, and the reference drugs (fenofibrate and evolocumab). Results A total of 477 cases involving pregnancy-related AEs associated with stains were submitted to the FAERS database by healthcare professionals. No obvious disproportionate association of abortion, abortion spontaneous, or stillbirth/fetal death was identified for all statins during gestation. In comparison with all the other drugs, lovastatin showed an increased risk of fetal complications (ROR = 2.45, 95% CI, 1.22–4.95; IC025 = 0.63), and pravastatin demonstrated increased risks of preterm birth (ROR = 4.89, 95% CI, 3.65–6.54; IC025 = 1.69) and low birth weight (ROR = 9.60, 95% CI, 5.56–16.56; IC025 = 1.88). Similar results were found when compared lovastatin or pravastatin with fenofibrate. Furthermore, statins were associated with higher proportion of fetal complications and preterm birth when comparing with evolocumab. Conclusions Statins did not increase the risk of pregnancy-related AEs, including abortion, abortion spontaneous, or stillbirth/fetal death. However, we did find significant disproportionality signals for preterm birth and low birth weight associated with pravastatin, and lovastatin was related to a higher proportion of fetal complications. The results in this study may provide evidence on the safety of statins during pregnancy, which need to be verified in further investigations.

Statins on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 RCTs.

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rising rapidly in the world. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of statins in the treatment of NAFLD. This study was conducted by searching The National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform databases. Literature data are expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or relative risk and 95% CI. For I2 > 50% trials, random effect model is used for statistical analysis, otherwise fixed effect model is used. Fourteen studies are selected for this meta-analysis, which includes totally 534 patients in the treatment group and 527 patients in the control group. As a result, 5 studies show that the total effective rate of the treatment group is 17% higher than that of the control group (Z = 2.11, relative risk = 1.17, 95% CI: [1.01-1.35]). Twelve studies show that alanine aminotransferase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.63, P = .009, MD = -5.53, 95% CI: [-9.64 to -1.41]). Eleven studies show that aspartate transaminase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.01, P = .04, MD = -3.43, 95% CI: [-6.77 to -0.08]). Six studies show that alkaline phosphatase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 0.79, P = .43, MD = -3.46, 95% CI: [-12.08 to 5.16]). Eight studies show that gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.04, P = .04, MD = -4.05, 95% CI: [-7.96 to -0.15]). Thirteen studies show that triglyceride levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 4.15, P < .0001, MD = -0.94, 95% CI: [-1.39 to -0.50]). Eleven studies show that the total cholesterol levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 5.42, P < .00001, MD = -1.51, 95% CI: [-2.05 to -0.96]). Seven studies show that low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 5.00, P < .00001, MD = -0.85, 95% CI: [-1.18 to -0.52]). Statins can significantly reduce liver biochemical indicators in patients with NAFLD.

LDL cholesterol targets rarely achieved in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: A sex and gender-specific analysis

Background and aimsDespite lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reaching LDL-C targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains challenging. Our aim was to determine attainment of LDL-C target levels and reasons for not reaching these in female and male FH patients. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of heterozygous FH patients in five hospitals in the Netherlands and Norway. Clinical characteristics and information about LLT, lipid levels and reasons for not being on LDL-C treatment target were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. ResultsWe studied 3178 FH patients (53.9% women), median age 48.0 (IQR 34.0–59.9) years. Median LDL-C before treatment and on-treatment was higher in women compared to men (6.2 (IQR 5.1–7.3) and 6.0 (IQR 4.9–7.2) mmol/l (p=0.005) and 3.0 (IQR 2.4–3.8) and 2.8 (IQR 2.3–3.5) mmol/L (p<0.001)), respectively. A minority of women (26.9%) and men (28.9%) reached LDL-C target. In patients with CVD, 17.2% of women and 25.8% of men reached LDL-C target. Women received less often high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Most common reported reasons for not achieving the LDL-C target were insufficient effect of maximum LLT (women 17.3%, men 24.3%) and side effects (women 15.2%, men 8.6%). ConclusionsIn routine practice, only a minority of women and men with FH achieved their LDL-C treatment target. Extra efforts have to be made to provide FH patients with reliable information on the safety of statins and their long-term effects on CVD risk reduction. If statin treatment is insufficient, alternative lipid lowering therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9-inhibitors should be considered.