Safety Of Statins In Patients Research Articles

Long-Term Benefits and Safety of Statins in Patients with Kidney Failure: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Patients with kidney failure are at elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases. Although statins were commonly used to mitigate cardiovascular disease risk among the population with high risk, the evidence for initiating statin therapy among patients with kidney failure remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefits and risks associated with statin therapy in patients with kidney failure. Using territory-wide public electronic health records in Hong Kong, 3,019 statin-eligible individuals with kidney failure and elevated LDL cholesterol ≥ 100 mg/dL from Jan 2008 to Dec 2015 were included for analysis. The framework of target trial emulation was adopted to investigate the risk of the major cardiovascular diseases (i.e., a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke), all-cause mortality, as well as the major adverse events (i.e., myopathies and liver dysfunction) between statin initiators and statin non-initiators. The pooled logistic model was used to obtain the hazard ratio (HRs) for the outcomes of interest in both intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Significant risk reduction associated with statin therapy (HR [95%CI]) was observed for major cardiovascular diseases (ITT: 0.78 [0.62, 0.98]; PP: 0.66 [0.50, 0.87]) and all-cause mortality (ITT: 0.80 [0.68, 0.95]; PP: 0.60 [0.48, 0.76]). The standardised 5-year and 10-year absolute risk reduction in per-protocol analysis was 7% (3%, 11%) and 11% (4%, 18%), respectively. No significant risks for the major adverse events were observed. Statin therapy was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in patients with kidney failure without a higher risk of major adverse events.

Statins for neuroprotection in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (STATIC): protocol for a multicentre, prospective and randomised controlled trial

IntroductionIntracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a neurological emergency with high morbidity and mortality, and current treatment is limited. Emerging evidence has reported that statins can exert neuroprotective effects in cerebrovascular diseases....

ПАЦИЕНТЫ С САХАРНЫМ ДИАБЕТОМ И АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТЕНЗИЕЙ В ПЕРИОД ПАНДЕМИИ COVID-19: МЕДИКАМЕНТОЗНЫЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ ПРОГНОЗА

The article considers the peculiarities of the use of different classes of antihypertensive medications in patients with diabetes mellitus, presents the results of studies of the influence of the main classes of blood pressure medications on the risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection and the severity of the course of COVID-19. Particular attention is paid to the stratification and correction of cardiovascular risk in diabetics, the safety of statins in patients with COVID-19 and the role of fixed combinations, including polypill, in increasing adherence to treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk during a pandemic.

Addition of statins to the standard treatment in patients with cirrhosis: Safety and efficacy.

This review summarizes the safety and efficacy of statins in patients with cirrhosis. Due to concerns about the safety of statins in patients with impaired liver function, they have recently been investigated as a potential treatment option in cirrhosis. The most clinically significant adverse event is statin-related myopathy, and this may be related to the high serum statin concentrations in the setting of severely impaired liver function. Rhabdomyolysis is the most serious and potentially life-threatening manifestation. It has recently been demonstrated that the recommended dose of simvastatin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis would be 20 mg/d because higher values, such as 40 mg/d, are associated with many adverse events, especially muscle injury. Likewise, simvastatin should not be administered to patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease score > 12 and/or Child-Pugh class C because of the high risk of severe muscle injury. Due to the pleiotropic effects, the focus on statins has shifted from being considered harmful to something useful. Through these effects, statins could prevent liver-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. Observational studies in large populations of patients with cirrhosis have shown that treatment with statins to decrease high cholesterol levels was associated with a reduced risk of hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma development and death. The few randomized controlled trials in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension showed that statins lower portal pressure, quite likely through a reduction in hepatic resistance. Another large randomized controlled trial in patients with variceal bleeding showed that simvastatin in addition to standard of care did not prevent rebleeding but improved survival rate. Despite these encouraging outcomes, the quality of the evidence regarding the use of statins is low or very low due to the observational characteristics of most of the studies involved. Therefore, it is advisable to perform further randomized controlled trials on a large series of patients with hard clinical endpoints, using different statin types and varying doses. The objectives would be to prevent liver-related morbidity and mortality rather than treating cirrhosis complications to take additional information that makes it possible to add statins to the standard of care of these patients.

Statin use in patients with non-HMGCR idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A retrospective study.

BackgroundStatins are the most widely used lipid lowering therapies which reduce cardiovascular risk, but are associated with muscular adverse events (AEs). Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are autoimmune diseases of the muscle with higher risk of cardiovascular disease. More data is needed regarding statin safety in patients with intrinsic muscle disease such as IIM.HypothesisStatins are tolerated in patients with IIM without leading to significant increase in muscular AEs.MethodsStatin use was retrospectively examined in a longitudinal IIM cohort. Safety analysis included assessment of muscular and nonmuscular AEs by chart review. IIM patients receiving a statin during the cohort follow‐up period were matched to IIM patients not receiving a statin for comparative analysis of longitudinal outcomes.Results33/214 patients had a history of statin use. 63% started for primary prevention, while others were started for clinical ASCVD events, vascular surgery, IIM related heart failure, and cardiac transplantation. A high intensity statin was used in nine patients with non‐HMGCR myositis, and tolerated in 8/9 patients. Statin related muscular AE was noted in three patients. There were no cases of rhabdomyolysis, or statin related nonmuscular AEs in a median observation period of 5 years. In patients newly started on statins during cohort follow‐up (n = 7) there was no change in disease activity after statin initiation. Long term outcomes were not different between statin and nonstatin IIM control groups.ConclusionStatins were well tolerated in patients with non‐HMGCR positive IIM. Given the accelerated atherosclerotic risk in IIM patients, further prospective studies of statin safety in IIM patients are warranted.

Safety of two different doses of simvastatin plus rifaximin in decompensated cirrhosis (LIVERHOPE-SAFETY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Statins have beneficial effects on intrahepatic circulation and decrease portal hypertension and rifaximin modulates the gut microbiome and might prevent bacterial translocation in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, this drug combination might be of therapeutic benefit in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, there is concern regarding the safety of statins in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We assessed the safety of two different doses of simvastatin, in combination with rifaximin, in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and moderate-to-severe liver failure from nine university hospitals in six European countries (Italy, France, Holland, Germany, the UK, and Spain). Patients older than 18 years with Child-Pugh class B or C disease were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to receive either simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, or placebo of both medications for 12 weeks. Randomisation was stratified according to Child-Pugh class (B vs C) and restricted using blocks of multiples of three. The primary endpoint was development of liver or muscle toxicity, as defined by changes in liver aminotransferases (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), alkaline phosphastase, and creatine kinase. The study is registered with the European Union Clinical Trials Register, 2016-004499-23, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03150459. The study recruitment period was between July 28, 2017, and Jan 2, 2018. Follow-up finished on March 12, 2018. 50 patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=18), simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=16), or placebo of both medications (n=16). Six patients (two from each group) were excluded. Therefore, the full analysis set included 44 patients (16 in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day group, 14 in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin mg/day group, and 14 in the placebo group). After a safety analyses when the first ten patients completed treatment, treatment was stopped prematurely in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group due to recommendations by the data safety monitoring board. Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed a significant increase in AST and ALT compared with the placebo group (mean differences between the groups at the end of treatment for AST 130 IU/L [95% CI 54 to 205; p=0·0009] and for ALT 61 IU/L [22 to 100; p=0·0025]. We observed no significant differences at 12 weeks in AST and ALT between the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin and placebo group (for AST -14 IU/L [-91 to 64; p=0·728] and for ALT -8 IU/L [-49 to 33; p=0·698]). We observed no significant differences in alkaline phosphatase between the the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin or the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin groups compared with placebo. Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed an increase in creatine kinase at the end of treatment compared with patients in the placebo group (1009 IU/L [208 to 1809]; p=0·014). We observed no significant changes in creatine kinase in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin group (4·2 IU/L [-804 to 813]; p=0·992). Three (19%) patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day group developed liver and muscle toxicity consistent with rhabdomyolysis. The number of patients who stopped treatment because of adverse events was significantly higher in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group (nine [56%] of 16 patients) compared with the other two groups (two [14%] of 14 for both groups; p=0·017). There were no serious unexpected adverse reactions reported during the study. Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a significant increase in adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal, particularly rhabdomyolysis, compared with simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin. We recommend simvastatin 20 mg/day as the dose to be used in studies investigating the role of statins in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Horizon 20/20 European programme.

Liver Safety of Statins in Prediabetes or T2DM and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease have a high cardiovascular risk, but statins are rarely prescribed because of fear of hepatotoxicity. To prospectively assess the long-term safety of statins in patients with prediabetes/type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Post hoc analysis of statin use during a randomized, controlled trial assessing pioglitazone vs placebo for NASH. A total of 101 patients (86 receiving statins) with biopsy-proven NASH and prediabetes/T2DM were followed for up to 36 months. Oral glucose tolerance test and percutaneous liver biopsy (baseline, month 18, and month 36); liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy and euglycemic insulin clamp (baseline and month 18). Histologic and biochemical safety of statin use among patients with NASH. Only 37% of patients were receiving statins at enrollment despite their high cardiovascular risk. Statin nonusers had higher plasma alanine aminotransferase levels but similar histologic severity of liver disease at baseline. In both statin users and nonusers, the same number of patients (n = 4) had a twofold or greater increase in plasma aminotransferases during follow-up. One statin nonuser was discontinued from the study because of this elevation. Values returned to normal without any active measure in all other cases. No changes on liver histology or hepatic insulin resistance were observed in patients with NASH newly started on a statin and receiving placebo during the main study. Statin therapy is safe in patients with prediabetes/T2DM and NASH. Given their high cardiovascular risk, statin therapy should be encouraged in this population.

The safety of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease

The safety of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease

Undiagosed hypothyroidism as risk factor of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis

Dyslipidemia is a frequent condition in patients with hypothyroidism which determines possible need for statin use in treatement. However, both hypothyroidism and statin use can lead to myopathy and rhabdomyolysis so safety concerns are important for clinical decision. Current article is a review of publications, clinical guidelines and drug labels which are related to the problem of statin safety in patients with hypothyroidism. Recommendations are given for use of statin in patients with compensated and decompensated hypothyroidism based on review of data.

Statins Are Safe for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Statins Are Safe for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

The safety of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in special populations at high cardiovascular risk.

Controlled clinical studies and clinical experience over many years have proven that virtually all patients benefit from lipid-lowering therapy with statins, even those with normal LDL cholesterol levels. Several recent large outcome trials have further demonstrated the clinical benefits and safety of statins in patients with a wide-range of high risks for cardiovascular disease. Those patients at highest absolute cardiovascular risk generally have the most to gain from statin therapy. A variety of statins are available to lower plasma lipids to guideline levels, but all differ in their pharmacokinetic properties, drug interaction profiles, and risk of myotoxicity. This has been highlighted by the withdrawal of cerivastatin from the market as a result of serious safety concerns. This review examines the safety and effectiveness of statins in special populations at high risk of cardiovascular disease-patients with coronary heart disease, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, hypertension, nephrotic disease, HIV, organ transplant patients and the elderly-with a focus on clinically relevant differences in the properties of individual statins that may influence the risk of drug interactions and side effects.