Safety Of Sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors Research Articles

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus placebo, initiated within the hospitalization period, in addition to habitual treatment, for treating adult patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also conducted subgroup analysis by diabetes mellitus (DM) status and type of AMI. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HF). The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and serious adverse events (AEs). We pooled risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary outcomes. The between-study variance was assessed using tau2 statistics. We included five RCTs, encompassing 11,211 patients. SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for HF compared to placebo (RR 0.73; 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]). However, the risk of all-cause death (RR 1.05; 95% CI [0.78, 1.41]) and cardiovascular death (RR 1.04; 95% CI [0.84, 1.29]) was similar between the groups, as well as the risk of serious AEs (RR 1.01; 95% CI [0.90, 1.14]). In the subgroup analysis by DM status and type of AMI, there were no significant subgroup differences for the outcomes of hospitalization for HF and all-cause death. In patients with AMI, treatment with SGLT2i is safe and significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization for HF, but it has no impact on all-cause death and cardiovascular death compared to placebo.

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Since there is no specific recommendation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction (MI), this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to address this lack of evidence. Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until May 30, 2024. We used both random and fixed-effects models for data analyses. Odds ratio (OR) and standard means difference (SMD) were performed for binary and continuous variables, respectively. Nine studies including five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and four observational studies including 15,595 individuals with acute MI were entered. Overall, SGLT-2 inhibitors are significantly associated with a reduction of hospitalization for heart failure (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97; P = .02; I2 = 0%) and all-cause mortality (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.81; P = .002; I2 = 0%) based on the RCTs and observational studies, respectively. SGLT-2 inhibitors also significantly improved the left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.70; P = .04; I2 = 62%) among RCTs. Further evaluation of these drugs also revealed an acceptable safety profile without any major adverse events. In conclusion, although SGLT-2 inhibitors may have some clinical benefits among acute MI individuals, further RCTs are still needed to provide robust evidence regarding the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in this setting.

The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Managing Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a significant clinical challenge despite advances in therapy. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as promising adjuncts in HFrEF management, with evidence from clinical trials suggesting improved outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFrEF. Methodology: A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from June 2023 to March 2024. Forty-eight patients with HFrEF were enrolled, and baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Patients received standard therapy alongside SGLT2 inhibitors. Follow-up assessments were performed over 10 months to evaluate changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), symptoms, functional capacity, and adverse events. Results: Following SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, a significant increase in LVEF (mean increase of 5.2 percentage points) was observed, accompanied by reductions in heart failure symptoms and improvements in functional capacity. Heart failure hospitalization rates decreased by 50%, with a favorable safety profile observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in managing HFrEF. The findings support their integration into clinical practice guidelines and emphasize the need for personalized, multidisciplinary approaches to optimize outcomes in HFrEF patients.

Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists in US veterans with and without chronic kidney disease: a population-based study

We examined the real-world comparative safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs. other newer anti-glycemic medications (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP4i], glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP1a]) in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Among US Veterans with diabetes receiving care from the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system over 2004-19, we identified incident users of SGLT2i vs. DPP4i vs. GLP1a monotherapy. In analyses stratified by CKD status, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria, we examined associations of SGLT2i vs. DPP4i vs. GLP1a use with risk of infection-related (primary outcome) and genitourinary infection hospitalizations (secondary outcome) using multivariable Cox models. Among 92,269 patients who met eligibility criteria, 52% did not have CKD, whereas 48% had CKD. In the overall and non-CKD cohorts, compared to DPP4i use, SGLT2i use was associated with lower infection-related hospitalization risk (HRs [95% CIs] 0.74 [0.67-0.81] and 0.77 [0.67, 0.88], respectively), whereas GLP1a use demonstrated comparable risk. However, in the CKD cohort SGLT2i and GLP1a use were each associated with lower risk (HRs [95% CIs] 0.70 [0.61, 0.81] and 0.91 [0.84, 0.99], respectively). Propensity score-matched analyses showed similar findings in the non-CKD and CKD cohorts. In the overall, non-CKD, and CKD cohorts, SGLT2i use was associated with lower genitourinary infection hospitalization risk whereas GLP1a use showed comparable risk vs. DPP4i use. In a national cohort of Veterans with diabetes, compared with DPP4i use, SGLT2i use was associated with lower infection-related and genitourinary infection hospitalization risk. VA Health Services Research and Development, USA.

Key results from observational studies and real-world evidence of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor effectiveness and safety in reducing cardio-renal risk.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally designed to manage blood sugar levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), have emerged as a crucial class of drugs for managing cardio-renal diseases. These drugs work by targeting the SGLT2 protein in the kidneys, promoting the excretion of glucose and influencing metabolic pathways beyond glucose control. The relationship between cardio-renal diseases and SGLT2 inhibitors has been explored through landmark trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies, demonstrating significant reductions in cardio-renal complications. This review discusses the importance of RWE studies alongside randomized controlled trials in understanding the real-world effectiveness and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors. It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of RWE compared to RCTs, highlighting their complementary roles in providing comprehensive insights into treatment outcomes. By examining a range of RWE studies, the review underscores the cardio-renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors across various patient populations. Safety assessments indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors are generally well tolerated, with severe adverse events being rare. Common issues, such as genital mycotic infections and urinary tract infections, are acknowledged, alongside less frequent but significant adverse events including diabetic ketoacidosis, lower-limb amputations, and bone fractures. In summary, SGLT2 inhibitors show promising cardio-renal protective effects in real-world scenarios across diverse populations in T2D, indicating their potential as early intervention measures. Continued research is essential for gaining a thorough understanding of their long-term effects and safety profiles.

The efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients: A scoping review.

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are used for the treatment of diabetes and for their cardiovascular and kidney benefits in patients with or without diabetes. Use in solid organ transplant recipients is controversial because transplant recipients were excluded from the major clinical trials assessing SGLT2 inhibitors. The goal of this review was to assess the available literature regarding the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients. A PubMed search was conducted for studies published in English through December 31, 2023. Studies were excluded if they were meta-analyses, review articles, commentaries, single case reports, or invitro studies, or did not involve the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients with a diabetic, cardiovascular, or kidney outcome being assessed. In the final review, 20 studies were included: kidney (n = 15), heart (n = 4), and liver/lung/kidney (n = 1) transplant recipients. SGLT2 inhibitors had similar A1c reduction efficacy and were found to be weight neutral with possible weight reduction effects. Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes were not adequately assessed in the available studies. Adverse effects were reported to occur at a similar rate in transplant recipients compared to the general population. SGLT2 inhibitors were initiated ≥1-year post-transplant in most transplant recipients included in these studies. The overall safety and antihyperglycemic efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in kidney and heart transplant recipients is similar to the general population. Data assessing SGLT2 inhibitors use in solid organ transplant recipients for longer durations are needed.

SGLT2i impact on HCC incidence in patients with fatty liver disease and diabetes: a nation-wide cohort study in South Korea.

This study evaluated the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cancer development, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in individuals with concomitant fatty liver disease (FLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Using data from Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, we performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and T2DM (NAFLD-T2DM cohort) and those with chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) alongside FLD and T2DM (FLD-T2DM-CVH cohort). In the propensity score (PS) matched NAFLD-T2DM cohort (N = 107,972), SGLT2i use was not associated with the occurrence of overall cancer, including HCC. However, old age, male sex, liver cirrhosis, and hypothyroidism were identified as independent risk factors for HCC occurrence, whereas statin and fibrate usage were associated with reduced HCC risk in this cohort in multivariate Cox analysis. In the PS-matched FLD-T2DM-CVH cohort (N = 2798), a significant decrease in HCC occurrence was observed among SGLT2i users (P = 0.03). This finding remained consistent in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (Hazard ratio = 2.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-4.85, P = 0.048). In conclusion, SGLT2i may be a beneficial option for diabetes management in patients with concomitant T2DM, FLD, and CVH while affirming the overall safety of SGLT2i in other types of cancer.

SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients: current knowledge and expectations.

The beneficial effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown recently in numerous randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews. According to KDIGO guidelines, SGLT2i currently represent a first choice for diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In addition, a recent meta-analysis of 13 large led by the 'SGLT2 inhibitor Meta-Analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists' Consortium' (SMART-C) provided solid evidence of SGLT2i beneficial effects in CKD or in patients with heart failure, with and without diabetes. Collectively, the patients treated with SGLT2i had a decreased risk of CKD progression, acute kidney injury (AKI), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or death from heart failure. Whether these cardio-renal benefits should be extrapolated to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) needs to be assessed in further studies. In this article, we report recent data accumulated so far in the literature, looking at the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in diabetic and non-diabetic KTR. We found encouraging data regarding the use of SGLT2i in KTR with diabetes. These agents appeared to be safe, and they reduced body weight and blood pressure in this group of patients. Potential effects on kidney graft function and survival are yet to be investigated.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: Analyses of short-term efficacy and safety.

Despite their potential, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not been well-studied in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) as randomized trials have excluded patients with this morbid disease. We performed a retrospective study assessing the short-term efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in ATTR-CM. We screened consecutive patients seen at a tertiary care centre and identified 87 ATTR-CM patients treated with SGLT2i and 95 untreated control patients. Endpoints included changes in weight, loop diuretic dose, and cardiac/renal biomarkers. The median age of the overall population was 79 (interquartile range [IQR] 11) years. Nearly 90% of patients were male, and 93% were on a transthyretin stabilizer. Control patients demonstrated generally less severe disease at baseline compared to SGLT2i-treated patients, with lower median Columbia risk score (p < 0.001). Median follow-up time was 5.6 (IQR 5.2) and 8.4 (IQR 2.1) months in the SGLT2i and control cohorts, respectively. Compared with controls, SGLT2i treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions from baseline in weight, loop diuretic dose, and uric acid during follow-up (p < 0.001). While no significant between-group differences were observed on cardiac biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly reduced versus controls 1 month after SGLT2i initiation (p = 0.002), but no significant differences were observed at later timepoints. Results were similar in a propensity score-matched analysis (n = 42 per cohort). A total of 10 (11.5%) patients discontinued SGLT2i, most commonly due to genitourinary symptoms. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were well tolerated by most patients with ATTR-CM and appeared to improve volume status and combat diuretic resistance. Randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparative efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A real-world experience.

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are a class of drugs with modest antidiabetic efficacy, weight loss effect, and cardiovascular benefits as proven by multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, real-world data on the comparative efficacy and safety of individual SGLT-2i medications is sparse. To study the comparative efficacy and safety of SGLT-2i using real-world clinical data. We evaluated the comparative efficacy data of 3 SGLT-2i drugs (dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin) used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data on the reduction of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, blood pressure (BP), urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR), and adverse effects were recorded retrospectively. Data from 467 patients with a median age of 64 (14.8) years, 294 (62.96%) males and 375 (80.5%) Caucasians were analysed. Median diabetes duration was 16.0 (9.0) years, and the duration of SGLT-2i use was 3.6 (2.1) years. SGLT-2i molecules used were dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 227; 48.6%), canagliflozin 300 mg (n = 160; 34.3%), and empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 80; 17.1). Baseline median (interquartile range) HbA1c in mmol/mol were: dapagliflozin - 78.0 (25.3), canagliflozin - 80.0 (25.5), and empagliflozin - 75.0 (23.5) respectively. The respective median HbA1c reduction at 12 months and the latest review (just prior to the study) were: 66.5 (22.8) & 69.0 (24.0), 67.0 (16.3) & 66.0 (28.0), and 67.0 (22.5) & 66.5 (25.8) respectively (P < 0.001 for all comparisons from baseline). Significant improvements in body weight (in kilograms) from baseline to study end were noticed with dapagliflozin - 101 (29.5) to 92.2 (25.6), and canagliflozin 100 (28.3) to 95.3 (27.5) only. Significant reductions in median systolic and diastolic BP, from 144 (21) mmHg to 139 (23) mmHg; (P = 0.015), and from 82 (16) mmHg to 78 (19) mmHg; (P < 0.001) respectively were also observed. A significant reduction of microalbuminuria was observed with canagliflozin only [ACR 14.6 (42.6) at baseline to 8.9 (23.7) at the study end; P = 0.043]. Adverse effects of SGLT-2i were as follows: genital thrush and urinary infection - 20 (8.8%) & 17 (7.5%) with dapagliflozin; 9 (5.6%) & 5 (3.13%) with canagliflozin; and 4 (5%) & 4 (5%) with empagliflozin. Diabetic ketoacidosis was observed in 4 (1.8%) with dapagliflozin and 1 (0.63%) with canagliflozin. Treatment of patients with SGLT-2i is associated with statistically significant reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and better than those reported in RCTs, with low side effect profiles. A review of large-scale real-world data is needed to inform better clinical practice decision making.

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: In recent decades, an increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in children and adolescents has been observed. Pediatric‐onset T2DM differs from the adult‐onset form, particularly regarding the durability of glycemic control and earlier appearance of complications. However, the scarcity of approved treatments and comprehensive studies on T2DM management in youth persists. Ongoing clinical trials seek to ascertain the efficacy and safety of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients aged between 10 and 24 years with T2DM. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta‐analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in pediatric patients and young adults with T2DM.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in children, adolescents, and young adults with T2DM compared with placebo. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and R statistical software 4.2.1. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.Results: We included three studies totaling 334 patients followed for 37.79 weeks. Reduction in HbA1C (MD = −0.93; 95% CI = −1.36 to −0.49; p &lt; 0.0001; I2 = 0%) was significantly higher in SGLT2i group compared with placebo. The proportion of patients requiring rescue or discontinuation of study medication due to lack of efficacy was statistically lower in SGLT2i group compared with placebo (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.43–0.94; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). SGLT2i and placebo were similar in terms of any adverse event (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.96–1.27; p = 0.17; I2 = 0%), serious side effects (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.44–2.57; p = 0.90; I2 = 0%), and individual adverse effects.Conclusion: In children, adolescents, and young adults with T2DM, SGLT2i appears to be effective and safe for glycemic control.

Current Place of SGLT2i in the Management of Heart Failure: An Expert Opinion from India.

Heart failure (HF) is a global health concern that is prevalent in India as well. HF is reported at a younger age in Indian patients with comorbidity of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in approximately 50% of patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), originally approved for T2DM, are new guideline-recommended and approved treatment strategies for HF. Extensive evidence highlights that SGLT2i exhibits profound cardiovascular (CV) benefits beyond glycemic control. SGLT2i, in conjunction with other guideline-directed medical therapies (GMDT), has additive effects in improving heart function and reducing adverse HF outcomes. The benefits of SGLT2i are across a spectrum of patients, with and without diabetes, suggesting their potential place in broader HF populations irrespective of ejection fraction (EF). This consensus builds on the updated evidence of the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in HF and recommends its place in therapy with a focus on Indian patients with HF.

Expanding the possibilities of using sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure.

Aim: To study the potential mechanisms of the beneficial cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, the possibilities of improving the treatment and prognosis of patients with acute heart failure (HF) during their use. Materials and Methods: The data analysis of literary sources has been conducted regarding the results of existing studies evaluating the clinical benefit and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with acute heart failure. Conclusions: The peculiarities of the pharmacological action of SGLT-2 inhibitors and the obtained research results expand the possibilities of using this group of drugs, demonstrating encouraging prospects in improving the prognosis of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter2 Inhibitors Added to Dual or Triple Treatment in Patients with Type2 Diabetes Mellitus.

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) add-on treatment in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the real-world setting. This single-center retrospective study used the clinical database of Seoul National University Hospital in South Korea. Patients who received metformin monotherapy or combination therapy with ≥ 1 other oral hypoglycemic medication and had a baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between 7.0% and 10.5% were included. Propensity score matching was applied between patients treated with and without SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i groups, respectively). Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week26 were compared between the SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i groups, and risk of adverse events (AE) were also assessed. A total of 1106 patients were included. At week26, HbA1c was significantly more reduced by 0.35 percentage points in the SGLT2i group than in the non-SGLT2i group (95%CI 0.30-0.41, P < 0.001). Likewise, the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% was also significantly higher (51.9% vs. 37.6%, P < 0.05) in the SGLT2i group than in the non-SGLT2i group. The risk of adverse events in the SGLT2i group was mostly comparable with those in the non-SGLT2i group except for diseases of the liver, pain, hypertensive diseases, and metabolic disorders, which showed significantly higher odds in the SGLT2i group. SGLT2i add-on treatment is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with T2DM in the real-world practice setting.

Cardiovascular outcomes and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in chronic kidney disease patients.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide cardiovascular protection for patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, there is little evidence of their application in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, there are inconsistent results from studies on their uses. Therefore, to explore the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in the CKD patient population, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cardiovascular effectiveness and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in this patient population. We searched the PubMed® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Web of Science™ (Clarivate™, Philadelphia, PA, USA) databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD patients and built the database starting in January 2023. In accordance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened, the quality of the literature was evaluated, and the data were extracted. RevMan 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and Stata® 17.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) were used for the statistical analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for the analysis of the outcome indicators. Thirteen RCTs were included. In CKD patients, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) by 28%, CVD by 16%. and HHF by 35%. They also reduced the risk of all-cause death by 14% without increasing the risk of serious adverse effects (SAEs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, they increased the risk of reproductive tract infections (RTIs). SGLT2 inhibitors have a cardiovascular protective effect on patients with CKD, which in turn can significantly reduce the risk of CVD, HHF, and all-cause death without increasing the risk of SAEs and UTIs but increasing the risk of RTIs.

Abstract 17053: Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Mortality in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Retrospective Study

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been demonstrated to improve outcomes in congestive heart failure (HF). However, their effect in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown. Research Question: Can SGLT2i improve clinical outcomes in HCM patients? Methods: Using TriNetX Global Research Network from March 2013 to February 2021, patients diagnosed with HCM (ICD-10 codes I42.1, I42.2) were identified and categorized into 2 groups: those on SGLT2i vs. those who are not. To avoid inclusion of other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy, patients with aortic stenosis or systemic hypertension were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to limit confounders. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were HF exacerbation, all-cause hospitalization, and documented cardiovascular symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, or leg edema) over a 2-year follow-up period. Results: A total of 27,561 HCM patients were identified; 408 (1.5%) on SGLT2i and 27,153 (98.5%) were not. Patients on SGLT2i were older (55 ± 15 vs. 48 ± 19, p&lt;0.01) and had more comorbidities, including a nearly 6-fold higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (44% vs. 7%, p&lt;0.01) and congestive HF (65% vs. 10%, p&lt;0.01). After PSM, each group consisted of 355 patients. HCM patients on SGLT2i had lower rates of all-cause mortality (OR 0.22 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.39]; p&lt;0.01), hospitalizations (OR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.98]; p=0.04), and cardiovascular symptoms (OR 0.71 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.97]; p=0.029) when compared to patients not on SGLT2i. There was no statistical difference in the rate of HF exacerbation (OR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.54, 1.24]; p=0.3). Conclusion: In this large dataset, SGLT2i use in a select subset of HCM patients was associated with improved survival, less hospitalizations, and fewer cardiovascular symptoms. These data support future randomized trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in more diverse HCM patient populations.

The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as an adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes assessed by continuous glucose monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimsPatients undergoing insulin-based therapy for type 1 diabetes often experience poor glycemic control characterized by significant fluctuations. This study was undertaken to analyze the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is), as an adjunct to insulin, on time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability in patients with type 1 diabetes, using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). In addition, we examined which type of SGLT2I yielded a superior effect compared to others. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and clinical trial registry websites, retrieving all eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up until February 2023. We analyzed the mean TIR, mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE), mean daily glucose (MDG), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), standard deviation (SD), total insulin dose, and severe hypoglycemia to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SGLT2Is. A random-effects model was also employed. ResultsThis study encompassed 15 RCTs. The meta-analysis revealed that the use of SGLT2Is as an adjuvant therapy to insulin led to a significant increase in TIR (MD = 10.78, 95%CI = 9.33–12.23, I2 = 42 %, P < 0.00001) and a decrease in SD (MD = −0.38, 95%CI = −0.50 to −0.26, I2 = 0 %, P < 0.00001), MAGE (MD = −0.92, 95%CI = −1.17 to −0.67, I2 = 19 %, P < 0.00001), MDG(MD = −1.01, 95%CI = −1.32 to −0.70, I2 = 48 %, P < 0.00001), and total insulin dose (MD = −5.81, 95%CI = −7.81 to −3.82, I2 = 32 %, P < 0.00001). No significant increase was observed in the rate of severe hypoglycemia (RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.76–1.43, P = 0.80). However, SGLT2I therapy was associated with increased DKA occurrence (RR = 2.79, 95 % CI = 1.42–5.48; P = 0.003, I2 = 16 %). In addition, the subgroup analyses based on the type of SGLT2Is revealed that dapagliflozin might exhibit greater efficacy compared to other SGLT2Is across most outcomes. ConclusionsSGLT2Is exhibited a positive effect on improving blood glucose level fluctuations. Subgroup analysis showed that dapagliflozin appeared to have more advantages. However, giving due consideration to preventing adverse effects, particularly DKA, is paramount. RegistrationProspero CRD42023408276.

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov till March 2023 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials of SGLT2i in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. We included data from 14 RCTs. SGLT2i reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.87; I2 = 0%); these results were consistent across the cohorts of HFmrEF and HFpEF patients. There was no significant decrease in the risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.13; I2 = 36%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.05; I2 = 0%). There was a significant improvement in the quality of life in the SGLT2i group (SMD 0.13, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.20; I2 = 51%). The use of SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome and a higher quality of life among HFpEF/HFmrEF patients. However, further research involving more extended follow-up periods is required to draw a comprehensive conclusion. PROSPERO (CRD42022364223).

THU298 Effect Of SGLT2 Inhibition On Metabolic, Cardiac And Renal Outcomes In Heart Transplant Recipients (EMPA-HTx study): Protocol And Study Design

Abstract Disclosure: L.M. Raven: None. C.A. Muir: None. C. Kessler Iglesias: None. E. Kotlyar: None. K. Muthiah: None. N.K. Bart: Advisory Board Member; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb. Grant Recipient; Self; Pfizer, Inc. Speaker; Self; Pfizer, Inc. P.S. Macdonald: Speaker; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca. C.S. Hayward: None. A. Jabbour: None. J.R. Greenfield: Speaker; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca. Background: Heart transplantation (HTx) is standard of care for treatment of end-stage heart failure. Immunosuppression medication, required to prevent rejection, can result in adverse metabolic and renal effects. Clinically significant post-transplant complications include metabolic (diabetes, weight gain), renal impairment and cardiac disease, such as allograft vasculopathy and myocardial fibrosis. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) may have positive effects on all of these post-transplant complications. SGLT2i have been observed to improve metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes following cardiac and renal transplantation, but their benefit and safety in HTx has not been evaluated in randomised prospective studies. Aims: The overall aim of this project is to study the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in HTx recipients. The primary end point will be improvement in glycaemic control assessed by change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or fructosamine, with secondary endpoints of cardiac fibrosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance, and renal function assessed by serum creatinine. Methods: Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of empagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo in recent HTx recipients. One hundred participants will be randomised 1:1. They will commence the study medication within 6-8 weeks of transplantation. Follow up will be 12 months after transplantation. Results from routine pre-HTx assessment will be reviewed to assess for pre-HTx diagnosis of diabetes. Routine laboratory tests, including full blood count, biochemistry, glucose, lipids and liver function as well as HbA1c, fructosamine, beta-hydroxybutyrate and urine albumin creatinine ratio, will be measured at baseline prior to receipt of study drug or placebo. Patients will be reviewed monthly during the study until 12 months post-HTx and data will be collected for each patient at each study visit. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance will be measured at baseline and 12 months after HTx. This study has been approved by St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH12184). Trial registration: ACTRN12622000978763. Discussion: This study will, for the first time, determine the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in HTx recipients. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Owing to the pharmacological mechanism, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) may be less effective in patients with reduced renal functions, but no systematic review or meta-analysis addressed chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients specifically. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SGLT2is in CKD patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mean difference (MD) were pooled for the decline of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR). Hazard ratio (HR) and rate ratio (RR) were pooled for composite of renal outcomes and adverse effects. Thirty articles were identified. Overall MD in rate of eGFR decline was 0.02 (P = 0.05), with a borderline significant difference favoring SGLT2is, while the change in uACR from baseline was - 141.34mg/g and hazard ratio of composite renal outcomes was 0.64 significantly favoring SGLT2is. Subgroup analyses showed that the long-term renal function, participants with baseline macroalbuminuria, and stage 4 CKD patients had significantly slower eGFR decline rate in SGLT2is compared to the placebo group. Risks of genital mycotic infection and ketoacidosis were significantly higher among the SGLT2is group than placebo. For CKD patients, no matter diabetic or non-diabetic, our study showed potential renoprotective effects favoring SGLT2is in overall and long-term phase, and in patients with macroalbuminuria or stage 4 CKD. However, only slight increased risk of adverse effects among the SGLT2is group is observed. Therefore, we concluded that in CKD patients, prescribing SGLT2is was safe and had renal benefits.