Safety Of Empagliflozin Research Articles

Empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in addition to background therapies and therapeutic combinations (EMPEROR-Reduced): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blind trial

It is important to evaluate whether a new treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) provides additive benefit to background foundational treatments. As such, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF in addition to baseline treatment with specific doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies. We performed a post-hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, which took place in 520 centres (hospitals and medical clinics) in 20 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II-IV with an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the addition of either oral empagliflozin 10 mg per day or placebo to background therapy. The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalisation; the secondary outcome was total heart failure hospital admissions. An extended composite outcome consisted of inpatient and outpatient HFrEF events was also evaluated. Outcomes were analysed according to background use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), as well as β blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) at less than 50% or 50% or more of target doses and in various combinations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057977. In this post-hoc analysis of 3730 patients (mean age 66·8 years [SD 11·0], 893 [23·9%] women; 1863 [49·9%] in the empagliflozin group, 1867 [50·1%] in the placebo group) assessed between March 6, 2017, and May 28, 2020, empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome (361 in 1863 participants in the empagliflozin group and 462 of 1867 in the placebo group; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·65-0·86]) regardless of background therapy or its target doses for ACE inhibitors or ARBs at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·85 [0·69-1·06]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·67 [0·52-0·88]; pinteraction=0·18). A similar result was seen for β blockers at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·66 [0·54-0·80]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·81 [0·66-1·00]; pinteraction=0·15). Empagliflozin also reduced the risk of the primary outcome irrespective of background use of triple therapy with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI plus β blocker plus MRA (given combination HR 0·73 [0·61-0·88]; not given combination HR 0·76 [0·62-0·94]; pinteraction=0·77). Similar patterns of benefit were observed for the secondary and extended composite outcomes. Empagliflozin was well tolerated and rates of hypotension, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalaemia were similar across all subgroups. Empagliflozin reduced serious heart failure outcomes across doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies for HFrEF. Clinically, these data suggest that empagliflozin might be considered as a foundational therapy in patients with HFrEF regardless of their existing background therapy. Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company.

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin at different doses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

As an oral hypoglycaemic drug that significantly reduces cardiovascular risk, empagliflozin is often used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the dosage and administration of empagliflozin are still controversial clinically. To determine the most appropriate dose, we performed this network meta-analysis. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about empagliflozin from eight databases. We analysed the pharmacodynamics, adverse effects (AEs), and pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin at different doses. We identified 8264 articles, of which 23 RCTs with 10518 patients were included. Regarding haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), high-daily doses (10, 25, 50mg) were significantly better than low doses (1, 2.5, 5mg). For total AEs, there was a dose-response trend in which safety decreased with increasing doses. According to SUCRA sequencing, the order for lowering HbA1c was 25 > 50 > 10 > 5 > 1mg, for lowering FPG was 50 > 25 > 10 > 5 > 2.5 > 1mg and for safety was 1> 5 > 10 > 25> 2.5 > 50mg. When considering HbA1c, FPG and total AEs, we performed a hierarchical cluster analysis and network meta-analysis to find that 25mg performed best among different doses, which was more significant after long-term use (≥ 12weeks). Pharmacokinetic parameters exhibited significant dose-response relationships. High-daily doses (10, 25, 50mg) had better efficacy than low doses (1, 2.5, 5mg). When considering HbA1c, FPG and total AEs, 25mg performed best among the different doses in patients with T2DM.

Pilot study in pharmacogenomic management of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic disorder in which the patients with high blood sugar develop insufficient insulin secretion or insulin resistance. The solute carrier family, 5 member 2 (SLC5A2) gene is a member of sodium/glucose transporter family which can reduce heart and kidney problems. The current study aims to look into any associationbetween rs11646054 variant in SLC5A2 gene and the anti-diabetic efficacy and safety of empagliflozin. 14 T2DM who failed to respond to previous treatments, empagliflozin 10mg was added for 6months. Genotyping of the rs11646054 variant of SLC5A2 gene was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Sanger sequencing. Although hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were not significantly different, but the mean fasting blood sugar (FBS), 2-h post prandial (2hpp), albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and total cholesterol (TC) were significantly decreased after 6months empagliflozin treatment. There was a significant difference in the mean final reductions in FBS level among genotypes. It's important to mention that those who were GG homozygotes had a tendency to have more decrements. The study results indicate that effects of variation in SLC5A2 (rs11646054) on the clinical efficacy of empagliflozin were negligible.

127-LB: Effectiveness and Safety of Empagliflozin in Routine Care in Europe and East Asia: Results from the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) Study

The EMPRISE study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin (EMPA) in a broader population of patients with T2D in routine clinical care across countries. The study included 67,140 pairs of 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) patients ≥18 years with T2D newly initiating EMPA or any DPP-4i from large databases/registers in Israel, Finland, Germany, Spain, Sweden, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Mostly, PSM used 100+ baseline covariates (Table), and pooled HR with 95% CI were computed using random-effects meta-analysis models. EMPA compared to DPP-4i (Table), was associated with 27-47% lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), stroke, all-cause mortality (ACM), and two composite outcomes: HHF & ACM; and myocardial infarction, stroke & ACM. Safety analyses associated EMPA with 46% lower risk of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. EMPRISE study results showed that EMPA is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, incl HHF, in patients with T2D in routine clinical care settings in Israel, Europe and East Asia. These results complement the results from clinical trial EMPA-REG OUTCOME®, and are in line with the ADA/EASD 2019 consensus update to prescribe SGLT-2i for patients with T2D and high-risk, vascular or chronic kidney disease or heart failure to reduce HHF and major adverse CV events/deaths. Disclosure A. Karasik: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S. S. Lanzinger: None. E. C. H. Tan: Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D. Yabe: Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Terumo Corporation. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MDS Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd. D. Kim: None. W. Sheu: None. C. Melzer Cohen: None. R. W. Holl: None. K. Ha: None. T. Nystrom: Board Member; Self; Abbott, Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. L. K. Niskanen: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M. Linnemann Jensen: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. M. H. Kyaw: Employee; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Nunez: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Abstract #1003971: Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin Combination in Non-hospitalized COVID-19 Positive Patients with T2DM in Real World Setting: A Single Center Retrospective Study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin and linagliptin combination (Empa/Lina) in non-hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes in real world clinical setting.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: rationale for and design of the EMPULSE trial.

AimsTreatment with sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improves outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. There is limited experience with the in‐hospital initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with acute HF (AHF) with or without diabetes. EMPULSE is designed to assess the clinical benefit and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin compared with placebo in patients hospitalized with AHF.MethodsEMPULSE is a randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled multinational trial comparing the in‐hospital initiation of empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) with placebo. Approximately 500 patients admitted for AHF with dyspnoea, signs of fluid overload, and elevated natriuretic peptides will be randomized 1:1 stratified to HF status (de‐novo and decompensated chronic HF) to either empagliflozin or placebo at approximately 165 sites across North America, Europe and Asia. Patients will be enrolled regardless of ejection fraction and diabetes status and will be randomized during hospitalization and after stabilization (between 24 h and 5 days after admission), with treatment continued up to 90 days after initiation. The primary outcome is clinical benefit at 90 days, consisting of a composite of all‐cause death, HF events, and ≥5 point change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ‐TSS), assessed using a ‘win‐ratio’ approach. Secondary outcomes include assessments of safety, change in KCCQ‐TSS from baseline to 90 days and change in natriuretic peptides from baseline to 30 days.ConclusionThe EMPULSE trial will evaluate the clinical benefit and safety of empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for AHF.

Influence of neprilysin inhibition on the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Reduced trial.

AimsWe evaluated the influence of sacubitril/valsartan on the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition with empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction.Methods and resultsThe EMPEROR-Reduced trial randomized 3730 patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction ≤40% to placebo or empagliflozin (10 mg/day), in addition to recommended treatment for heart failure, for a median of 16 months. A total of 727 patients (19.5%) received sacubitril/valsartan at baseline. Analysis of the effect of neprilysin inhibition was 1 of 12 pre-specified subgroups. Patients receiving a neprilysin inhibitor were particularly well-treated, as evidenced by lower systolic pressures, heart rates, N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide, and greater use of cardiac devices (all P < 0.001) when compared with those not receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Nevertheless, when compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients receiving or not receiving sacubitril/valsartan [hazard ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.89), P = 0.009 and hazard ratio 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90), P = 0.0008, respectively, interaction P = 0.31]. Empagliflozin slowed the rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate by 1.92 ± 0.80 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in patients taking a neprilysin inhibitor (P = 0.016) and by 1.71 ± 0.35 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in patients not taking a neprilysin inhibitor (P < 0.0001), interaction P = 0.81. Combined inhibition of SGLT2 and neprilysin was well-tolerated.ConclusionThe effects on empagliflozin to reduce the risk of heart failure and renal events are not diminished in intensively treated patients who are receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Combined treatment with both SGLT2 and neprilysin inhibitors can be expected to yield substantial additional benefits.

Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review

Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review

Safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post hoc analysis of data from the SACRA study.

Elderly diabetic patients are likely to have uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension, which confers higher risks of cardiovascular events and heart failure. To investigate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a sub‐analysis was performed of data from the SGLT2 inhibitor and Angiotensin receptor blocker Combination theRapy in pAtients with diabetes and uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension (SACRA) study, a multi‐center, double‐blind, randomized, parallel study of T2DM patients who were treated with empagliflozin for 12 weeks. In the present analysis, we compared efficacy and safety outcomes in participants aged <75 and ≥75 years. At baseline, 44 participants were ≥75 years and 87 were <75 years. Nighttime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased by 4.2 mm Hg in the ≥75‐year‐old group and by 7.9 mm Hg in the <75‐year‐old group (p = .884 for the between‐age group difference in the change between baseline and week 12) [primary endpoint]. Empagliflozin, but not placebo, significantly reduced mean 24‐h SBP (−8.7 mm Hg in ≥75‐year‐olds vs. −11.0 mm Hg in <75‐year‐olds) and daytime SBP (−10.8 mm Hg in ≥ 75‐year‐olds vs. −12.3 mm Hg in <75‐year‐olds) between baseline and week 12, with no significant differences between the groups. In addition, there were significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin, body weight, and uric acid during 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment in the two age groups. The incidences of hypoglycemic episodes, hypotension, and metabolic adverse events were similar in the two groups. Thus, empagliflozin was effective and well tolerated in elderly diabetic patients with uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when administered for 12 weeks.

Abstract 17275: The SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Ameliorates Left Atrial Dilatation in Non-Diabetic Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the EMPATROPISM Trial

Background: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve prognosis in HFrEF patients. We recently demonstrated in a porcine model of non-diabetic HFrEF that empagliflozin (EMPA) ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling and improves LV systolic function. However, the effect of EMPA on left atrial (LA) dilatation has not yet been studied Hypothesis:: Empagliflozin ameliorates left atrial dilatation in non-diabetic HFrEF patients Methods: The EMPATROPISM clinical trial investigated the efficacy and safety of EMPA in non-diabetic HFrEF patients. 84 patients were randomized to EMPA 10mg daily for 6 months or placebo on top of optimal medical treatment, and were evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). LA Volumes were quantified by CMR using the Simpson method (the number of slices in the usual short axis SSFP cine sequence was increased to cover both LV and the whole of LA. The primary endpoint was change in LVEDV. Prespecified secondary endpoints were changes in maximal and minimal LA volumes (ΔMax LA Vol and ΔMin LA Vol) at the end of 6 months between both arms Results: 80 patients completed the follow up period. There were no differences at baseline in LVEDV (220±75 vs 209±68mL for EMPA vs placebo, p=0.5) or LVEF (36±8 vs 37±8%, p=0.7). There were no differences at baseline in both groups in either maximal or minimal LA volume (Table). In the primary endpoint, EMPA-treated patients showed decrease in LVEDV and increase in LVEF (ΔLVEDV -25±25 vs -1±25mL, p&lt;0.001; and ΔLVEF 6±4 vs 0±4%, p&lt;0.001 for EMPA vs placebo). EMPA-treated patients exhibited a reduction of both maximal LA volume (ΔMax LA Vol -16.2±17.8 vs 11.4±25.9mL for EMPA vs placebo, p&lt;0.001) and minimal LA volume (ΔMin LA Vol -11.3±13.3 vs 6.4±19.3mL for EMPA vs control, p&lt;0.001) Conclusions: In HFrEF patients without diabetes, treatment with empagliflozin ameliorates left atrial dilatation. As LA volume is a surrogate for chronic filling pressures, this reduced LA volume suggest improved diastolic function with EMPA

Abstract 17157: The SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Ameliorates Interstitial Myocardial Fibrosis and Aortic Stiffness in Non-Diabetic Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the EMPATROPISM Trial

Background: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve prognosis in HFrEF patients. We recently demonstrated in a porcine model of non-diabetic HFrEF that empagliflozin (EMPA) ameliorates adverse cardiac remodeling and improves LV systolic function. However, the effect of EMPA on interstitial myocardial fibrosis (IMF) and aortic stiffness has not yet been studied Hypothesis: Empagliflozin ameliorates IMF and aortic stiffness in non-diabetic HFrEF patients Methods: The EMPATROPISM clinical trial (NCT 03485222) investigated the efficacy and safety of EMPA in non-diabetic HFrEF patients. 84 patients were randomized to EMPA 10mg daily for 6 months or placebo on top of optimal medical treatment, and were evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). IMF was assessed by CMR using extracellular volume (ECV) by T1 mapping. Aortic stiffness was quantified by pulse wave velocity (PWV) by CMR. The primary endpoint was change in LVEDV. Prespecified secondary endpoints were changes in ECV (ΔECV) and PWV (ΔPWV) at 6 months between both arms Results: 80 patients completed the follow up period. There were no differences at baseline in LVEDV (220±75 vs 209±68mL for EMPA vs placebo, p=0.5) or LVEF (36±8 vs 37±8%, p=0.7). There were no differences at baseline in both groups in either ECV or PWV (Table). In the primary endpoint, EMPA-treated patients showed decrease in LVEDV and increase in LVEF (ΔLVEDV -25±25 vs -1±25mL, p&lt;0.001; and ΔLVEF 6±4 vs 0±4%, p&lt;0.001 for EMPA vs placebo). EMPA-treated patients exhibited a reduction in ECV (ΔECV -1.25±1.5 vs 0.3±1.4% for EMPA vs placebo, p&lt;0.001), which demonstrates IMF regression with SGLT2i. EMPA-treated patients exhibited a reduction in PWV (ΔECV -0.6±1 vs 0.6±1.4 m/s for EMPA vs control, p&lt;0.001), which indicates amelioration of aortic stiffness with SGLT2i Conclusions: In HFrEF patients without diabetes, treatment with empagliflozin ameliorates IMF and aortic stiffness. This may explain the benefits of SGLT2i in HFrEF even in the absence of diabetes

Comparison of efficacy and safety of empagliflozin vs linagliptin added to premixed insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label study

AimsSodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors added to insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can improve glycaemic control. This study compared the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and linagliptin added to premixed insulin therapy in patients with poorly controlled T2DM. MethodsIn this 24-week, open-label, parallel-design randomized controlled trial, patients with poorly controlled T2DM despite a premixed insulin regimen were randomized to receive 5mg of linagliptin (n=53) or 25mg of empagliflozin (n=53) for 24 weeks. ResultsAt week 24, changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline were −0.06±0.17% and −1.01±0.16% in the linagliptin and empagliflozin groups, respectively, and the mean treatment HbA1c difference was −0.88% (95% CI: −1.33, −0.43). At week 24, the empagliflozin group showed significant reductions, compared with the linagliptin group, in fasting plasma glucose (P<0.001), body weight (P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (P=0.003) and total daily insulin dose (P=0.042). Hypoglycaemia was reported to be slightly, and not significantly, higher in the empagliflozin group vs linagliptin group (30.2% vs 22.6%, respectively; P=0.51). Similar percentages of patients (1.9%) had urinary tract infections in the two groups. ConclusionIn Asian patients with inadequately controlled T2DM while taking premixed insulin, the addition of empagliflozin for 24 weeks provided better glycaemic control and greater reductions in body weight and systolic blood pressure than the addition of linagliptin.Clinical Trial Registration #: NCT03458715.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Bioequivalence of Two Empagliflozin Formulations after Single Oral Administration under Fasting and Fed Conditions in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-label Randomized Single-dose Two-sequence, Two-treatment, Two-period Crossover Study.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties and safety of empagliflozin, and the bioequivalence of test formulation empagliflozin tablet compared with the brand-name drug Jardiance (reference formulation) after single oral administration under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects. An open-label randomized single-dose two-sequence, two-treatment, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese subjects, with 30 subjects under fasting condition and another 30 subjects under fed condition. Under each condition, subjects received a single oral administration of either the test or reference empagliflozin formulation, and then they received a single oral dose of the other formulation after a 7-day washout period. A total of 29 subjects under each condition completed the study. The maximum plasma drug concentration, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to t (AUC0-t ), and the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) of test formulation and reference formulation was 186.90±47.21 and 190.60±40.94ng/ml, 1303.04±234.28 and 1267.78±217.07ng·hour/ml, and 1328.08±243.84 and 1293.22±224.82ng·hour/ml under fasting condition, and 151.55±23.86 and 154.08±30.40ng/ml, 1215.65±197.62 and 1199.26±186.23ng·hour/ml, and 1241.76±202.47 and 1225.54±192.10ng·hour/ml under fed condition, respectively. The two formulations of empagliflozin were bioequivalent, and both were generally well tolerated under fasting and fed conditions.

134-LB: Effectiveness and Safety of Empagliflozin in Routine Care Patients: Interim Results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) Study

EMPRISE studies the effectiveness, safety and healthcare utilization of empagliflozin (EMPA), using data from Medicare and 2 U.S. commercial claims datasets (2014-2019). In an interim analysis on data from 2014-2017, we identified 39,169 pairs of 1:1 propensity score-matched patients ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes initiating EMPA or a DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i). Effectiveness outcomes of interest were HHF [defined as a HF discharge diagnosis in the primary (HHF-Specific) or in any position (HHF-Broad)], a composite of MI and stroke, and all-cause mortality (Medicare only). Safety outcomes were lower-limb amputations (LLA), bone fractures, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and acute kidney injury (AKI). We estimated pooled HR and 95% CI adjusting for &amp;gt;140 baseline covariates. Compared to DPP-4i, EMPA had a reduced risk of HHF [HHF-Specific: 0.46 (0.30-0.73); HHF-Broad: 0.63 (0.51-0.77)], a similar risk of MI or stroke [HR (95% CI) = 0.89 (0.73-1.09)], and a reduced risk of all-cause mortality [0.52 (0.36-0.76) in Medicare. Over a mean follow up of 178 days, EMPA was associated with a decreased risk of AKI [(0.64 (0.53-0.77)], an increased risk of DKA [1.56 (1.00-2.44)], and a similar risk of LLA and fractures (Table 1). In routine care, EMPA had an effectiveness profile consistent with RCT findings and safety outcomes in line with documented information. Disclosure E. Patorno: Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. A. Pawar: None. L.G. Bessette: None. J. Franklin: None. M. Najafzadeh: None. D.J. Wexler: Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. A. Deruaz-Luyet: Employee; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH. K. Brodovicz: Employee; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. S. Schneeweiss: None. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim

Fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The present meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin + linagliptin combination compared with either monotherapy [n=6 randomized controlled trials; 2857 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on diet + exercise ± metformin; 39.7% women; mean age: 54.6-59.9 years]. The combination of empagliflozin 10 mg + linagliptin 5 mg led to significantly greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) compared with either drug alone over 24 weeks: weighted mean difference [WMD; -0.72%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.04, -0.40], and fasting plasma glucose (-1.60 mmol/L 95% CI: -2.21, -1.00). Similar results were observed when empagliflozin 25 mg + linagliptin 5 mg was compared with linagliptin 5 mg monotherapy or with empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg monotherapy. Patients with T2DM treated with the drug combination had more than three times higher likelihood of achieving HbA1c <7% than those on either monotherapy. Weight reduction was significantly greater in the combination group only when compared with linagliptin monotherapy. Safety profile was similar between combination treatment and monotherapies. Overall, the empagliflozin + linagliptin combination had superior efficacy and similar safety in achieving euglycaemia compared with either monotherapy. This combination, administered once daily, has the potential to reduce regimen complexity, enhance adherence and improve outcomes in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add-on to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add‐on to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Materials and methodsThis multicentre, double‐blind, parallel‐group study randomized Japanese patients with T2D insufficiently controlled with insulin (1:1:1) to empagliflozin 10 mg (n=89), empagliflozin 25 mg (n=90) or placebo (n=90) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 16 weeks.ResultsAt 16 weeks, empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg significantly decreased HbA1c: adjusted mean difference −0.92% (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.11, −0.73) and −1.00% (95% CI −1.18, −0.82; both P<0.0001) compared with placebo. This difference was maintained up to 52 weeks: adjusted mean difference at 52 weeks −0.90% (95% CI −1.09, −0.70) and −0.96% (95% CI −1.15, −0.77; both P<0.0001). At 52 weeks, significant improvements in fasting plasma glucose (adjusted mean difference −27.62 mg/dL [95% CI −36.15, −19.08] and −31.99 mg/dL [95% CI −40.35, −23.62]) and in body weight (−1.78 kg [95% CI −2.46, −1.10] and −1.92 kg [95% CI −2.58, −1.25]) were also seen with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg compared with placebo (all P<0.0001). At 52 weeks, the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar in the three treatment groups; confirmed hypoglycaemia was reported slightly more in participants in the empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg groups (23.3% and 22.2% vs 14.4%). All hypoglycaemic events were mild in severity; no episodes required assistance.ConclusionsIn Japanese patients with insufficiently controlled T2D, adding empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg to insulin treatment was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c at 16 weeks and was generally well tolerated.

Impact of EMpagliflozin on cardiac function and biomarkers of heart failure in patients with acute MYocardial infarction—The EMMY trial

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established antidiabetic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. Although growing evidence suggests beneficial effects on myocardial remodeling, fluid balance and cardiac function, the impact of empagliflozin initiated early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been investigated yet. Therefore, the impact of EMpagliflozin on cardiac function and biomarkers of heart failure in patients with acute MYocardial infarction (EMMY) trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in diabetic and non-diabetic patients after severe AMI. Within a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial we will enroll patients with AMI and characteristics suggestive of severe myocardial necrosis are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary endpoint is the impact of empagliflozin on changes in NT-proBNP within 6 months after AMI. Secondary endpoints include changes in echocardiographic parameters, levels of ketone body concentrations, HbA1c levels and body weight, respectively. Hospitalization rate due to heart failure or other causes, the duration of hospital stay and all-cause mortality will be assessed as exploratory secondary endpoints. The EMMY trial will test empagliflozin in patients with AMI regardless of their diabetic status. The EMMY trial may therefore underpin the concept of SGLT2 inhibition to improve cardiac remodeling, pre-and afterload reduction and cardiac metabolism regardless of its antidiabetic effects. Results will provide the rationale for the conduct of a cardiovascular outcome trial to test the effect of empagliflozin in patients with AMI.

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes After the Introduction of an Off-Label Use Protocol for Clinical Practice.

Aims: We evaluated the real-life efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with optimized insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: This was a prospective study, including 27 patients with T1D treated with insulin therapy to whom empagliflozin was added according to an off-label protocol approved for use in clinical practice. The primary end point was the change in HbA1c 52 weeks after the addition of empagliflozin to insulin therapy. Blood pressure (BP), weight, and safety were also assessed. Results: At week 52, the addition of empagliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c from 8.0% ± 0.7% to 7.2% ± 0.8% (P < 0.001). The mean percentage of time in range for capillary glucose monitoring increased from 50% to 62% (P = 0.008) in parallel to a -0.08 IU/(kg·day) reduction in insulin requirements (P = 0.031). There was also a reduction in the body weight (-8 kg) and in systolic BP from 134 to 127 mmHg (P < 0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events were genitourinary infections (10 episodes in 52 weeks of follow-up). One patient developed an episode of mild diabetic ketoacidosis that motivated empagliflozin withdrawal. No severe hypoglycemic events were registered. Conclusions: Our results suggested that the use of empagliflozin following a strict off-label protocol may represent an effective and safe option in real life among patients with T1D, improving metabolic control, and ameliorating some cardiovascular risk factors.

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in older patients in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial.

The risks of cardio-renal complications of diabetes increase with age. In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial, empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular (CV) mortality by 38% in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CV disease. Here we compare outcomes with empagliflozin in older patients in EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Patients with T2D and CV disease were randomised to empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg, or placebo plus standard of care. In post hoc analyses, risks of 3-point major adverse CV events (3P-MACE: composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or non-fatal stroke), CV death, hospitalisation for heart failure, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalisation and incident/worsening nephropathy were evaluated for empagliflozin versus placebo by baseline age (<65, 65 to <75, ≥75 years). Adverse events (AEs) were analysed descriptively. Effect of empagliflozin on all outcomes was consistent across age categories (P ≥ 0.05 for interactions) except 3P-MACE. The 3P-MACE hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84, 1.29), 0.74 (0.58, 0.93) and 0.68 (0.46, 1.00) in patients aged <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 years, respectively (P = 0.047 for treatment-by-age group interaction). Corresponding CV death HRs were 0.72 (95% CI 0.52, 1.01), 0.54 (0.37, 0.79) and 0.55 (0.32, 0.94), respectively (P = 0.484 for treatment-by-age group interaction). Across age categories, empagliflozin AEs reflected its known safety profile. Rates of bone fractures, renal AEs and diabetic ketoacidosis were similar between empagliflozin and placebo across age categories. In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, empagliflozin reduced risks of CV mortality, heart failure and renal outcomes, supporting its cardio-renal benefits in older patients.

Empagliflozin in type 1 diabetes.

There is a clear unmet need in people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although the quality of life of people with T1D has improved, issues like hypoglycemia, weight gain and variability in glucose profiles remain. In this review, the clinical efficacy and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in T1D, is described based on a review of phase 2 and 3 studies to date. Empagliflozin and SGLT2 inhibitors, in general, are effective glucose-lowering drugs, which also work in people with T1D. Recent phase II and III studies, including the EASE trials for empagliflozin, showed a clear beneficial effect on HbA1c, body weight, glucose variability and total daily insulin use in people with T1D. No increase in hypoglycemia risk, in particular severe hypoglycemia, was observed, but genital infections were more prevalent. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors comes with a decrease in insulin doses, making individuals more prone to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The uniqueness of the EASE program is that here, a very low dose of empagliflozin was used, with less, but still present, effects on metabolic outcomes, but interestingly a lower risk of DKA. Importantly, even in the higher doses of empagliflozin, it is clear that the overall risk for DKA remains low, most likely by educating patients and caretakers intensively on this subject. In conclusion, evidence is building on the potential of using empagliflozin, like other SGLT2 inhibitors, in T1D. However, to date, the use of empagliflozin is not approved in people with T1D. Clinicians will have to weigh the potential short- and long-term benefits of these adjunct therapies versus the potential acute side effects, in particular, the small but real risk of DKA in the individual T1D patient.