Safety Of Baricitinib Research Articles

Baricitinib in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: report of six cases.

The objective of this case series is to describe the efficacy and safety of baricitinib (BARI) in a group of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and/or giant cell arteritis (GCA). These patients were treated with BARI due to either a refractory disease course or the unavailability of tocilizumab because of the pandemic. A total of six patients (five females and one male, median age 64 years, range 50-83) were treated with BARI. Two of them had isolated PMR, two had PMR with associated large vessel (LV)-GCA, one had LV-GCA presenting as fever of unknown origin, and one had cranial-GCA. All patients reported improvement with BARI. At the time of starting BARI, patients were taking a median prednisone dose of 8.75 mg/day (range 0-25), and the four patients with PMR had a median PMR-AS of 23.3 (indicating high disease activity), which decreased to 1.58 after 6 months of treatment with BARI. Two of them could stop glucocorticoids (GC) and continued BARI monotherapy. One patient suffered from pneumonia, and BARI was therefore stopped. No other adverse events attributable to BARI were detected. Our case series supports previous reports suggesting efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors as a GC-sparing strategy in PMR and GCA.

Low-Dose Baricitinib Plus Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B for the Treatment of Progressive Non-Segmental Vitiligo: AProspective, Controlled, Open-Label Study.

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease, and current treatments for vitiligo have limited efficacy. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors could offer new therapeutic options. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) in vitiligo treatment. This prospective, controlled, open-label study included adults with progressive non-segmental vitiligo (NSV). Patients were assigned to combination therapy with baricitinib 2 mg daily and NB-UVB three times a week or NB-UVB alone three times a week (control). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 50% or greater improvement from baseline in the total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50) at week 16. Of the 33 patients (mean age, 34.1 years; 27.3% women) who completed the study, 12 of 17 (70.6%) patients in the combination group and 2 of 16 (12.5%) in the control group had a T-VASI50 response at week 16 (relative risk [RR] = 5.6; 95% CI = 1.5-21.4; p = 0.001). Adverse events were minor, including erythema, mild blister after phototherapy and acne. Combination therapy with low-dose baricitinib and NB-UVB was effective and well tolerated in adults with progressive NSV.

Is Baricitinib Effective and Safe for Patients with Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis? Comparative Data with the Rheumatoid Arthritis Group of Rheumatoid Arthritis Not Difficult to Treat

Objective: This study investigates the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) compared to those without, aiming to determine its potential as an alternative treatment for D2T RA. Subject and Methods: A total of 78 patients participated in this retrospective cohort study, with 33 meeting the D2T RA criteria and 45 in the non-D2T RA group. Various clinical and laboratory parameters, adverse events, and disease activity indices were assessed, alongside drug efficacy and survival rates. Results: Patients with D2T RA exhibited higher seronegativity, prior use of b-DMARDs and c-DMARDs, and longer disease duration. Both groups experienced reductions in VAS and DAS28 scores, as well as SDAI, CDAI, HAQ, CRP, and ESR levels at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-baricitinib initiation, with sustained efficacy observed over 12 months. The most prevalent adverse event was infection (28.21%). Although initial drug survival rates were similar between groups, the non-D2T RA group demonstrated higher rates at 24 months (46.70% vs. 59.40%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable survival rates between D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups, whether treated with baricitinib alone or in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide. Conclusion: Despite potential treatment resistance, patients meeting the D2T RA criteria shared similar safety and efficacy profiles with those non-D2T RA. Baricitinib emerges as a promising treatment option for D2T RA patients, offering effectiveness and safety comparable to the non-D2T RA group.

Real-life effectiveness and safety of baricitinib in patients with severe alopecia areata: A 24-week Italian study.

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune condition characterized by rapid hair loss in the scalp, eyebrows and eyelashes, for which treatments are limited. Baricitinib, an oral inhibitor of Janus kinases 1 and 2, has been recently approved to treat alopecia areata. We conducted a retrospective study involving 23 medical centres across Italy, enrolling patients affected by severe alopecia areata (SALT >50), for more than 6 months. Clinical and trichoscopic assessment was performed at each visit and impact on quality of life, anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Skindex-16 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. A total of 118 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 39 years and a mean SALT >95. The mean value of the SALT score decreased from an average of 96.6 (±8.23 sd) to 48 (±35.2 sd) after 24 weeks of treatment and 42.3% of patients achieved a SALT 30, 31.3% a SALT 20 and 20.3% a SALT 10 by Week 24. Trichoscopic signs showed fewer yellow dots and black dots significantly earlier than hair regrowth. Adverse events during the treatment period (mild laboratory test abnormalities) were reported in 12.7% patients. No drop-out were registered. Data on the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib are promising and support the use of this drug in severe forms of AA, also in the early stages. We also suggest performing trichoscopy in order to reveal early response to therapy.

53274 Real-world experience of efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Korean patients with severe alopecia areata

53274 Real-world experience of efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Korean patients with severe alopecia areata

Design and Rationale of the Phase 2 Baricitinib Study in Apolipoprotein L1–Mediated Kidney Disease (JUSTICE)

Individuals of recent West African ancestry develop focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and hypertension-attributed end-stage kidney disease (HTN-ESKD) at 4 times the rate of White Americans. Two protein-coding variants of the Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene, G1 and G2, explain 50% to 70% of the excess risk of HTN-ESKD and FSGS among this group. Increased expression of G1 and G2 in the kidney, mediated by Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling, drive pathogenesis of these kidney diseases. Baricitinib is an orally active inhibitor of JAK1/2 that blocks APOL1 synthesis. The Janus kinase-STAT Inhibition to Reduce APOL1-Associated Kidney Disease (JUSTICE) trial is evaluating the antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with APOL1-associated FSGS and HTN-attributed chronic kidney disease (HTN-CKD). JUSTICE is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot phase 2 trial of baricitinib in patients with proteinuria, APOL1-associated FSGS or APOL1-associated HTN-CKD without diabetes. A total of 75 African American patients with APOL1-associated CKD, including 25 with FSGS and 50 with HTN-CKD, aged 18 to 70 years will be randomized 2:1 to daily treatment with baricitinib or placebo, respectively. The primary efficacy end point will be percent change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to end of month 6. The primary safety end point will be incidence of clinically significant decreases in hemoglobin of≥ 1g/dl. The phase 2 JUSTICE study will characterize the antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in patients with APOL1-associated FSGS and APOL1-associated HTN-CKD.

A Review of JAK Inhibitors for Treatment of Alopecia Areata in the Military Health Care System.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease that manifests as patchy hair loss on the scalp and other parts of the body; severe disease may result in disfigurement, functional impairment, and significant psychological distress. This condition is understood to be caused by autoimmunity to the hair follicle and subsequent arrest of hair growth. New medications, baricitinib and ritlecitinib, belong to the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor family and are among the first FDA-approved treatments for severe AA. In this manuscript, we aim to answer the question: What treatment options exist for AA in the military health care system (MHS)? In doing so, we review the pathogenesis, physical and psychosocial impact of AA, conventional treatment of AA, and the efficacy and safety of baricitinib and ritlecitinib. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Ovid for the history and pathogenesis of AA, psychosocial impact of disease, functional impairments, and current treatments. Keywords "alopecia areata," "current therapy for alopecia areata," "pathogenesis alopecia areata," "baricitinib," "ritlecitinib," "JAK inhibitor alopecia," "JAK inhibitor safety," "baricitinib efficacy," "alopecia eyelash," "alopecia nails," and "psychosocial impact of alopecia" were used for the search. The TRICARE manual was searched for guidelines applicable to the treatment of AA, DoD Instruction 6130.03 Volume 2 for medical standards for military service, and the U.S. Central Command Modification 15 for fitness of deployment to Central Command area of operations. Traditional treatments such as intralesional steroids may be effective for some patients, but difficulty lies in controlling extensive or refractory disease. Janus kinase inhibitors, baricitinib and ritlecitinib, are found effective at improving severe refractory disease; baricitinib induced hair regrowth in 32.6% more patients than placebo, and ritlecitinib was found to be superior to placebo by at least 24%. Currently, there is no coverage for therapeutic treatment of hair growth in the MHS. Additionally, military members are disqualified for continued service if they require immunomodulator medications such as baricitinib and ritlecitinib. Those on immunomodulators are unable to deploy worldwide. Baricitinib and ritlecitinib are effective treatments for widespread, progressive, and refractory AA. Although JAK inhibitors demonstrate improved effectiveness compared to non-immunomodulator treatments, their use in the MHS for this purpose is limited.

Baricitinib for Prurigo Nodularis: A Pilot Study on Efficacy and Safety

Background. Breaking the itch-scratch cycle and facilitating lesion healing are pivotal in managing prurigo nodularis (PN). This study seeks to assess the efficacy of baricitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, for treating PN. Methods. In this prospective pilot study, 12 patients with moderate to severe PN were administered oral baricitinib at a dosage of 4 mg/day for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of baricitinib in PN patients using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, NRS sleep score, a 5-point investigator’s global assessment (IGA) scale, dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and nodular lesion count at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12. In addition, the NRS pruritus and sleep scores were assessed via phone on days 2 and 4 after baricitinib treatment. Results. Baricitinib treatment led to a statistically significant improvement in the mean NRS pruritus and sleep scores, evident as early as day 2 (57.7% change from baseline; P<0.001, and 34.7% change from baseline, P=0.029, respectively) and consistently declining thereafter. Evaluation of nodular lesions revealed a significant reduction starting from week 2 (mean difference of 37.08 from baseline; P<0.001). Analysis of other endpoints, including mean DLQI and IGA scores, also demonstrated substantial improvement at all time points (week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12) compared to baseline. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitation of a small sample size. This constraint warrants consideration when interpreting the results and generalizing the findings. Conclusion. This preliminary study underscores baricitinib’s potential for PN treatment by providing a rapid clinical response. The larger and longer randomized controlled trials are essential to determine the effectiveness, longevity, and safety of baricitinib in managing PN. This trial is registered with TCTR20230227002.

The Real-World Effectiveness, Persistence, Adherence, and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitor Baricitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long-Term Study.

Background/Aim: Baricitinib (BAR) is the first oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved in Europe for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Real-world data are still needed to clarify its long-term benefits/risk profile. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, persistence, adherence, and safety of BAR in a real-world setting. Methods: An ambispective study was conducted between October 2017 and December 2021 in RA patients starting BAR. The effectiveness was evaluated, assessing changes from the baseline of the Disease Activity Score using 28-joint counts-C reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and the achievement of low disease activity/remission. Drug persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Adherence was estimated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and the 5-item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology. Safety was assessed determining global incidence proportion and adverse event adjusted incidence rates. Results: In total, 61/64 recruited patients were finally analyzed, 83.6% were female, 78.7% were seropositive, the mean age was 58.1 (15.4) years, and the disease duration was 13.9 (8.3) years. A total of 32.8% of patients were naïve to biologics and 16.4% received BAR as monotherapy. The median exposure to BAR was 12.4 (6.6-31.2) months (range 3.1-51.4). A significant change in DAS28CRP was observed after treatment (difference -1.2, p = 0.000). 70.5% and 60.7% of patients achieved low disease activity or remission, respectively, and 50.8% (31/61) remained on BAR throughout the follow-up, with a median persistence of 31.2 (9.3-53.1) months. The average MPR was 0.96 (0.08) and all patients exhibited "good adherence" according to the questionnaire. In total, 21.3% of patients discontinued baricitinib due to toxicity. Conclusions: In our real-world practice, BAR demonstrated effectiveness, large persistence, high adherence to treatment, and an acceptable safety profile.

Baricitinib for refractory Takayasu arteritis: a prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre

ObjectiveTo investigate the treatment efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK).MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study in which baricitinib 4 mg daily was prescribed to...

Treatment of moderate-to-severe alopecia areata in patients over the age of 65 years with baricitinib.

Baricitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has been approved by the US Food and Drugs Administration for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) in adults. However, the clinical trials that demonstrated the efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of severe AA did not include men aged > 60 years or women aged > 70 years. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in 14 patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate-to-severe AA. After a mean (SD) duration of 18.5 (11.9) months, a 72% reduction in mean Severity of Alopecia Tool score from baseline was observed. Partial or complete eyebrow and eyelash hair was observed in 57% and 43% of patients, respectively. The adverse effects of baricitinib were mild. No cases of venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events or malignancy were reported.

Effectiveness and safety of baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe refractory alopecia areata in real world: Anopen-label, single-center study.

Baricitinib is a small-molecular drug that selectively inhibits the Janus Kinase (JAK) 1 and 2. However, it showed various efficiency and safety in treating moderate-to-severe alopecia areata (AA). This study was to describe the real-world effectiveness of baricitinib in treating moderate-to-severe refractory AA. Patients who were affected by moderate-to-severe AA and reported no shrinkage in the alopecia area after 6 months of conventional treatment were enrolled in the retrospective study. The patients were treated with baricitinib orally for at least 24 weeks. The severity of alopecia was evaluated at the end of 4, 12, and 24 weeks of treatment. The 32 patients included 23 females and nine males, with a median duration of AA of 14.5 months. Among them, 28 patients received baricitinib 2 mg per day for 24 weeks while the other four patients increased the daily dose from 2 to 4 mg after the first 12 weeks due to the unobvious hair restoration. SALT value showed a significant decrease from baseline at week 12 and 24 (64.45 [44.68-100.00] vs. 26.80 [13.40-62.32], p < 0.0001 and 64.45 [44.68-100] vs. 9.40 [4.85-34.95], p < 0.0001). After 24 weeks of treatment, 50% of patients had an improvement of ≥2 points in IGA scores from the baseline, and IGA scores of 68.75% of patients were less than 2. This 24-week research showed that baricitinib had favorable clinical efficacy and safety in treating moderate-to-severe AA, which is worthy of attention and expectation.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Databases were searched for studies that compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of baricitinib with standard therapy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 and clearly reported relevant outcomes published until December 31, 2022. The corresponding data were extracted from these studies. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates. The study protocol can be accessed at PROSPERO (CRD42023394173). The baricitinib group had a significantly lower mortality rate and proportion of patients who received mechanical ventilation than the control group (OR = 0.61, 0.57; P = .008, 0.02; 95% CI 0.42-0.88; 0.35-0.92; I2 = 71% and 86%, respectively). The length of hospital stay and rates of severe adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Baricitinib reduces mortality and mechanical ventilation requirements in patients with severe COVID-19. Therefore, we developed a comprehensive understanding of the role of baricitinib in patients with severe COVID-19.

Baricitinib in Combination with High-Dose Dexamethasone As First-Line Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Introduction: High-dose dexamethasone is among the standard initial therapeutic options for patients with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Although most patients achieve initial remission, optimal first-line therapy remains a challenge due to the low rates of sustained response and the high incidence of corticosteroid-dependency. Antiplatelet autoantibodies and splenic macrophages play central roles in the pathogenesis of ITP. Baricitinib, a Janus-associated kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor, can inhibit antigen presentation by innate immune cells and subsequent T-cell activation while also alleviating B-cell abnormalities and antibody production. The results of our single-arm pilot study suggested that baricitinib might increase the rate of durable response in patients with steroid-resistant or relapsed ITP (NCT05446831, presented at EHA2023, P1594). Accordingly, we further conducted a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus high-dose dexamethasone as first-line therapy for adulthood ITP. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted in 10 different tertiary medical centers in China. Adult patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, confirmed primary ITP who had a platelet count &amp;lt;30×10⁹/L, or a platelet count &amp;lt;50×10⁹/L with clinically significant bleeding, were eligible for this study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive baricitinib (2 mg daily for 6 consecutive months) plus high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg daily for 4 consecutive days, repeated in the case of lack of response by Day 10) or high-dose dexamethasone alone. The primary endpoint was durable response at the 6-month follow-up. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety profiles were analyzed in all patients receiving at least one dose of study medications. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee or institutional review board of each participating center and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 05932524). Results: A total of 172 patients were screened, of which 132 patients were eligible for this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive baricitinib plus high-dose dexamethasone (n=66) or high-dose dexamethasone monotherapy (n=66). Four patients did not receive allocated treatment, leaving 128 patients in the safety analysis set. At the 6-month follow-up, a significantly higher proportion of participants in the baricitinib plus high-dose dexamethasone group (42/66, 63.6%) than in the high-dose dexamethasone monotherapy group (25/66, 37.9%) achieved durable response (OR 2.870, 95% CI 1.416-5.816; p=0.003). Initial response was achieved by 52 (78.8%) patients in the combination group and 47 (71.2%) patients in the monotherapy group. No significant difference was observed in the median time from initial treatment to response between the two groups. Complete response (at any time during the treatment) was achieved by 40 (60.6%) patients in the combination group and 35 (53.0%) patients in the monotherapy group. Patients responding to treatment in the combination group showed significantly longer durations of response than responders in the monotherapy group. Patients in both groups reported significantly improved health-related quality of life. The most common adverse events were infections (15/64, 23.4%) and insomnia (12/64, 18.8%) in the combination group, and insomnia (10/64, 15.6%) and anxiety or mood disorders (9/64, 14.1%) in the monotherapy group. No grade 4 or worse adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported in either group. No thrombotic events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), treatment-related bleeding or anemia were observed. Treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event was reported in 2 (3.1%) patients in the combination group and 3 (4.7%) patients in the monotherapy group. Conclusions: This is the first study reporting JAK inhibition as a first-line therapy for ITP. Baricitinib at 2 mg daily plus high-dose dexamethasone was well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed ITP and might contribute to achieving a higher rate of durable response.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib or ravulizumab in adult patients with severe COVID-19 (TACTIC-R): a randomised, parallel-arm, open-label, phase 4 trial

From early in the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence suggested a role for cytokine dysregulation and complement activation in severe disease. In the TACTIC-R trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2, and ravulizumab, a monoclonal inhibitor of complement C5 activation, as an adjunct to standard of care for the treatment of adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19. TACTIC-R was a phase 4, randomised, parallel-arm, open-label platform trial that was undertaken in the UK with urgent public health designation to assess the potential of repurposing immunosuppressants for the treatment of severe COVID-19, stratified by a risk score. Adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were enrolled from 22 hospitals across the UK. Patients with a risk score indicating a 40% risk of admission to an intensive care unit or death were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to standard of care alone, standard of care with baricitinib, or standard of care with ravulizumab. The composite primary outcome was the time from randomisation to incidence (up to and including day 14) of the first event of death, invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiovascular organ support, or renal failure. The primary interim analysis was triggered when 125 patient datasets were available up to day 14 in each study group and we included in the analysis all participants who were randomly assigned. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04390464). Between May 8, 2020, and May 7, 2021, 417 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to standard of care alone (145 patients), baricitinib (137 patients), or ravulizumab (135 patients). Only 54 (39%) of 137 patients in the baricitinib group received the maximum 14-day course, whereas 132 (98%) of 135 patients in the ravulizumab group received the intended dose. The trial was stopped after the primary interim analysis on grounds of futility. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) for reaching the composite primary endpoint was 1·11 (95% CI 0·62-1·99) for patients on baricitinib compared with standard of care alone, and 1·53 (0·88-2·67) for ravulizumab compared with standard of care alone. 45 serious adverse events (21 deaths) were reported in the standard-of-care group, 57 (24 deaths) in the baricitinib group, and 60 (18 deaths) in the ravulizumab group. Neither baricitinib nor ravulizumab, as administered in this study, was effective in reducing disease severity in patients selected for severe COVID-19. Safety was similar between treatments and standard of care. The short period of dosing with baricitinib might explain the discrepancy between our findings and those of other trials. The therapeutic potential of targeting complement C5 activation product C5a, rather than the cleavage of C5, warrants further evaluation. UK Medical Research Council, UK National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Eli Lilly and Company, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSLE is an autoimmune disease marked by broad immunological dysregulation and multi-system inflammation. Baricitinib is one of the novel treatments for SLE. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in treating SLE.MethodWe looked for all published randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included all RCTs comparing baricitinib and placebo in the treatment of SLE. Review Manager 5.4 program was used for data analysis.ResultsThree trials with a total of 1849 individuals were included. Participants in the baricitinib group were significantly more likely to attain SRI-4 response than those in the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P = 0.01]. Additionally, baricitinib performed better than the placebo in terms of reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2 K score [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.04, 1.22), P = 0.004]. In terms of SLEDAI-2 K remission of arthritis or rash, baricitinib was also superior to placebo [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.00, 1.17), P = 0.04]. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.97, 1.05), P = 0.61].ConclusionBaricitinib is potentially safe and effective in the treatment of SLE. It has successfully met the study’s primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints highlighting its potential to improve the outcomes of SLE. Despite achieving an SRI-4 response, glucocorticoids sparing and some other secondary outcomes weren’t reached by baricitinib.

Baricitinib and tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of regular clinical practice

ObjectiveMain objective: Describe the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib and tofacitinib in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in our hospital. Secondary objective: Analyse whether there are differences between the two drugs in routine clinical practice. MethodTwo-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis treated in our hospital with baricitinib and tofacitinib for at least 6 months. Databases: Electronic medical record and outpatient medication dispensing software. Variables collected: Demographic variables, poor prognosis factors, previous treatment, duration of treatment, concomitant treatment, DAS28, number of swollen and painful joints, pain visual analogy scale, treatment discontinuation, and adverse reactions. Effectiveness evaluation: Decreases in the DAS28 scale, the number of swollen and painful joints, and the pain Visual Analogy Scale at 6 months and 12 months after starting treatment. Safety evaluation: Detection of adverse reactions. Statistical analysis: Student t-test. ResultsA total of 44 patients were evaluated. Of these, 20 (70% women) received treatment with baricitinib and 24 (95.8% women) received tofacitinib. Baricitinib reduced the DAS28 by 2.3 and 1.7 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the scale by 2 and 1.9 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced the number of swollen and painful joints by 7 at both 6 months and 12 months, and tofacitinib reduced the number of swollen and painful joints by 4 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced the Visual Analogy Scale score by 7.8 and 6.8 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the score by 5 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Corticosteroid treatment was needed in 40% of patients treated with baricitinib and 62.5% of patients treated with tofacitinib. Treatment was discontinued due to loss of effectiveness in 10% of patients receiving baricitinib and 25% of patients treated with tofacitinib. Adverse reactions were experienced by 10% of patients treated with baricitinib and 12.5% of patients treated with tofacitinib. Adverse reactions led to treatment discontinuation in only 1 patient in each group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two drugs. ConclusionsThe results show that baricitinib and tofacitinib were effective and safe in relation to all the variables analysed. Moreover, both drugs were similar in terms of effectiveness and safety for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with alopecia areata: evidence to date.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, tissue-specific autoimmune disorder, characterized by non-scaring hair loss, with a global prevalence of approximately 2%. Typically, it affects a young population, with initial onset frequently occurring before the age of 30 years. Even though the exact pathogenesis of AA remains unclear, the predominant hypothesis is the breakdown of immune privilege of the hair follicle, resulting in increased self-antigen and major histocompatibility complex expression in the follicular epithelium. The relapsing nature of the disease negatively impacts patients' quality of life and makes them more susceptible to developing psychiatric comorbidities. Although many treatment modalities have been proposed, there are no currently available treatments able to induce and sustain disease remission. Traditional treatment modalities, despite being widely used, present limited results and a high risk of adverse effects. Hence, there exists an unfulfilled requirement for treatments that are both more efficient and safer. The latest understanding of the pathophysiology of AA and its connection to the JAK-STAT pathway has prompted the advancement of JAK inhibitors. These small-molecule agents function by obstructing the JAK-STAT intracellular signalling pathway. Baricitinib an orally administered, selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor is a promising alternative to the available treatments, and is already approved for the treatment of AA.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerance of Baricitinib for the Treatment of Severe Alopecia Areata with 1-Year Follow-Up Data.

The efficacy of conventional treatments for alopecia areata (AA) has been extremely variable and disappointing, with a high rate of relapse. Recent clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety of baricitinib (an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor) in alopecia areata. We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and tolerance of baricitinib in alopecia areata in a real-life Belgian monocentric adult cohort. The primary outcome was evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of ≤ 20 at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected. In this 19-patient series, with a median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up duration of 13 ± 16.2months, we demonstrated that: (i) hair regrowth was observed in nearly 90% of patients between 4 and 16weeks after initiation of baricitinib; (ii) at the end of the follow-up, more than 70% and, in particular, 100% of patients with patchy AA, reached the primary outcome (SALT score ≤ 20); (iii) almost half of the patients, mostly with patchy AA, showed a complete hair regrowth (SALT score = 0), within a median ± IQR treatment time of 8.5 ± 10months; (iv) baricitinib was discontinued in three patients with total hair regrowth, two of whom relapsed; and (v) no serious adverse events were reported. Baricitinib is effective in treating patients with alopecia areata, particularly for the patchy phenotype, but with a risk of relapse after discontinuation. Safety data are reassuring, with lipid changes being the most frequent adverse event.

Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Baricitinib, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, is indicated to treat active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This systematic review described the real-world clinical characteristics of baricitinib-treated patients with RA, prescription patterns, effectiveness, drug persistence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; physical function, pain, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), patient global assessment (PGA), and safety of baricitinib. A PRISMA systematic review of real-world studies was conducted to identify relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2022 using MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and evidence-based medicine review databases. Websites or online repositories of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology were searched manually to include relevant abstracts from conferences held between January 2016 and November 2022. A total of 11,472 records were identified by searching online databases. Seventy studies were included in the study, of which 40 were abstracts. Most patients were older (51-71 years), female, and with mean RA duration of 4-19 years. Baricitinib was mostly used after the failure of one or more bDMARDs, and 4 mg dosing was prevalent in patients with RA (range 22-100%). Clinical effectiveness of baricitinib was reported in real-world settings regardless of prior biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use. Achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission was reported in 8.7-60% of patients at week 12 and CDAI low disease activity (LDA) in 20.2-81.6% at week 24. The proportion of patients attaining Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission was reported in 12% at week 4 to 45.4% at 24 weeks. Drug persistence was high, similar, or equal to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. No new safety signals were identified. Baricitinib demonstrated effectiveness in the real-world setting with a consistent safety profile observed in clinical studies. Better persistence rates for baricitinib compared to bDMARDs with improvement in PROs were reported, although baricitinib-treated patients had RA with poor prognostic characteristics.