Safety Of Aprotinin Research Articles

Aprotinin for coronary bypass operations: Efficacy, safety, and influence on early saphenous vein graft patency

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin in a U.S. population of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Early vein graft patency rates were assessed by ultrafast computed tomography. A total of 216 patients at five centers were randomized to receive either high-dose aprotinin or placebo during the operation; 151 patients underwent primary operation, and 65 underwent repeat procedures. Total blood product exposures in the primary group were 2.2 per patient receiving aprotinin as compared with 5.7 per patient receiving placebo (p = 0.010). The repeat group had 0.3 exposures per patient receiving aprotinin as compared with 10.7 per patient receiving placebo (p = < 0.001). Consistent reductions in the percent of patients requiring donor red blood cells and in the number of units of platelets, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate required were associated with the use of aprotinin in both primary and repeat groups. Mortality was 5.6% in the aprotinin group and 3.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.517). In the primary group, clinical diagnoses of myocardial infarction were made in 8.9% of patients receiving aprotinin as compared with 5.6% of the patients receiving placebo (p = 0.435). In the repeat group, infarctions occurred in 10.3% of patients receiving aprotinin and 8.3% of patients receiving placebo (p = 1.000). Secondary analysis of electrocardiograms and available enzyme data showed no significant difference in infarction rates between the treatment groups. There was no difference in clinically significant renal dysfunction. The early vein graft patency rates were 92.0% in the aprotinin group and 95.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.248). In this study, aprotinin was effective in reducing bleeding and blood product transfusion rates, and its use was not associated with an increase in complications. An adverse effect on early vein graft patency rates was not demonstrated, but the number of grafts assessed was insufficient for absolute conclusions in this regard.

Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: A placebo-controlled study : Cosgrove DM 111, Heric B, Lytle BW, et al: Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1031–1038

Abstract We tested the efficacy and safety of aprotinin in 169 patients undergoing isolated reoperative myocardial revascularization. Patients were randomly assigned to high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, or placebo treatment groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, red cell mass, number of grafts, use of internal thoracic artery, or incidence of preoperative aspirin therapy. Patients treated with aprotinin had a significant reduction in postoperative chest tube drainage (720 ± 753, 866 ± 1,636, and 1,121 ± 683 mL, respectively, for high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, and placebo; p p

Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: A placebo-controlled study

We tested the efficacy and safety of aprotinin in 169 patients undergoing isolated reoperative myocardial revascularization. Patients were randomly assigned to high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, or placebo treatment groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, red cell mass, number of grafts, use of internal thoracic artery, or incidence of preoperative aspirin therapy. Patients treated with aprotinin had a significant reduction in postoperative chest tube drainage (720 ± 753, 866 ± 1,636, and 1,121 ± 683 mL, respectively, for high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, and placebo; p < 0.001). Transfusion requirements were reduced in aprotinin-treated patients (2.1 ± 4.2,4.8 ± 11.8, and 4.1 ± 6.2 units for high-dose, low-dose, and placebo, respectively; p < 0.001). A similar reduction in chest tube drainage and transfusion requirements was seen in patients using aspirin preoperatively. Q-wave myocardial infarctions were increased in the aprotinin subgroups (17.5%, 14.3%, and 8.9% for high-dose, lowdose, and placebo groups; not significant). Acute vein graft thrombosis was found in six of 12 vein grafts studied at postmortem examination in patients receiving aprotinin but not in any of five grafts in patients receiving placebo. We conclude that aprotinin is extremely effective in reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements and may increase the risk of graft thrombosis.