Safety Endpoints Research Articles

Impact of Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Mid-term Outcomes in Women Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insight from the WIN TAVI Registry

Limited evidence exists concerning the prognostic impact of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on outcomes among women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which we aimed to investigate in the current analysis. Patients from the WIN-TAVI registry were categorized according to baseline LVEF into three groups: reduced (LVEF≤40%), mildly reduced (40%< LVEF<50%), and preserved (LVEF≥50%) LVEF. The primary Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) efficacy endpoint was as a composite of mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or heart failure, or valve-related dysfunction at 1-year. The primary (VARC-2) safety endpoint included all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complication, life-threatening bleeding, stage 2-3 acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, or valve-related dysfunction requiring repeated procedures. A Cox regression model was performed using the preserved LVEF group as reference. Among the 944 patients included, 764 (80.9%) exhibited preserved, 80 (8.5%) had mildly reduced, and 100 (10.6%) had reduced LVEF. The 1-year incidence of VARC-2 efficacy endpoint was numerically higher in patients with reduced LVEF, albeit not resulting in a significant risk difference. Notably, reduced LVEF was associated with a higher risk of the 1-year VARC-2 safety endpoint, still significant after adjustment (28.0% vs 19.6%, HR: 1.78; 95% CI 1.12 – 2.82, p=0.014). These differences were primarily driven by trends toward increased rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major vascular complications. Clinical outcomes were similar between patients with mildly reduced and preserved LVEF. In conclusion, when performed in women with reduced LVEF, TAVI was associated with a worse (VARC-2) safety profile at 1-year follow-up. In contrast, patients with mildly reduced LVEF appeared to align more closely with outcomes observed in the preserved LVEF group than with the reduced LVEF group.

TRanscatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery: the TRACS trial: TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The indication to TAVI should be agreed upon by a Heart Team, and the procedure should be performed in centers with on-site cardiac surgery. However, TAVI complications requiring emergent cardiac surgery (ECS) have become very rare. Concurrently, access disparities and prolonged waiting times are pressing issues due to increasing clinical demand of TAVI. Many solutions have been proposed and one of them is the possibility of performing TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery. The TRanscatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery (TRACS) trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and deemed inoperable, at high surgical risk, or presenting with at least one clinical factor compromising the benefit/risk ratio for ECS, will be randomized to undergo TAVI either in centers with or without on-site cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint will be the composite occurrence of all-cause death, stroke, and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes at one year. The safety endpoint will include death attributable to periprocedural complications actionable by ECS. The study aims to enroll 566 patients. The TRACS trial aims to address critical gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVI procedures performed in centers without on-site cardiac surgery, potentially improving access and outcomes for high-risk patients. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05751577.

Rationale and Design of the DEFIANCE Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Anticoagulation Alone for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

BackgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common medical condition that is associated with clinically significant sequelae, including postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation alone remains the guideline-recommended treatment for many patients with iliofemoral DVT. Recent technological advances have led to an increase in the use of mechanical thrombectomy for DVT, but mechanical thrombectomy-based procedures have not yet been compared with standard-of-care anticoagulation therapy in randomized studies. MethodsThe DEFIANCE study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05701917) is an international and actively enrolling randomized controlled trial (RCT) in lower extremity DVT assessing an interventional strategy that includes mechanical thrombectomy with the ClotTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) versus anticoagulation alone. Approximately 300 patients with unilateral iliofemoral DVT and symptom duration ≤12 weeks will be randomized 1:1. Study conduct includes an independent core laboratory for duplex ultrasound assessment, an independent medical monitor for safety adjudication, and evaluation of PTS severity on the Villalta scale using best clinical practices. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome structured as a hierarchal win ratio of 1) the occurrence of treatment failure or therapy escalation as adjudicated by the medical monitor, with failure defined as amputation or gangrene of the target leg or venous thromboembolism-related mortality, and 2) the assessment of PTS severity at the 6-month follow-up visit. In addition to being a component of the primary endpoint, the severity of PTS at 6 months is also evaluated as a stand-alone secondary endpoint. An additional secondary endpoint is a composite of outcomes at the 10-day visit and is structured as a hierarchal win ratio of 1) vessel compressibility on duplex ultrasound, 2) patient-reported pain, and 3) improvement of edema. The safety endpoints are access site complications requiring endovascular or surgical repair and the occurrence through the 30-day visit of mortality, major bleeding, or new symptomatic pulmonary embolism. ConclusionsDEFIANCE will be the first RCT to evaluate a mechanical thrombectomy-based interventional approach versus anticoagulation therapy alone for DVT. The results will inform the treatment of patients with iliofemoral DVT and the prevention of PTS-associated morbidity. Trial RegistrationDEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis (DEFIANCE), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05701917, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05701917?cond=Deep%20Vein%20Thrombosis&term=defiance&rank=1

Evaluating the risk of cardiovascular events associated with different immunosuppression treatments for glomerular diseases.

Patients with glomerular disease are at high risk of cardiovascular disease but the contribution of immunosuppression to this risk is unclear. In this retrospective cohort study of 1912 patients (comprised of 759 with IgA nephropathy, 540 with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, 387 with membranous nephropathy and 226 with minimal change disease) from British Columbia, Canada, we evaluated the association between exposure to specific immunosuppressive medications and a composite outcome including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial events. Survival models were adjusted for baseline cardiovascular risk factors, type of glomerular disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria over time. During a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 212 patients (11.1%) experienced the primary outcome. Corticosteroid exposure was not significantly associated with the primary outcome after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. In fully adjusted models, cumulative calcineurin inhibitor exposure at modest (150-300 defined daily doses [DDD]) and higher (300 or more DDD) doses were associated with a 2-fold higher risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.98, 95% confidence interval 1.27-6.95) and (2.78, 1.32-5.84), respectively. A peak daily dose of antimetabolite (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and mycophenolate sodium) of 0.5 or more DDD was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events after adjustment for baseline risk factors and type of glomerular disease, but not after adjusting for time-varying eGFR and proteinuria (1.70, 0.91-3.20). Each 10 grams of cumulative cyclophosphamide exposure was associated with a 1.5-fold higher risk of cardiovascular events in a fully adjusted model (1.46, 1.22-1.75) Thus, our findings suggest that immunosuppressive therapies used in the treatment of glomerular disease may have different cardiovascular risk profiles, which should be considered when deciding on immunosuppression for individual patients and as a safety endpoint in future clinical trials.

The LAVA Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study of a Liquid Embolic System for Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Hemorrhage

PurposeTo present the results of the Liquid Embolization of Arterial Hemorrhages in Peripheral Vasculature (LAVA) study evaluating safety and efficacy of Lava Liquid Embolic System (Lava LES), an ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), for peripheral arterial hemorrhage (PAH). Materials and MethodsLAVA was a pivotal, prospective, multicenter, single-group, centrally adjudicated study of adults with active PAH. Patients received EVOH at one of two viscosities, administered by experienced physicians. Primary safety endpoint was freedom from 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as ischemia/infarction of target territory, non-target embolization, allergic reaction, and catheter breakage/entrapment. Primary efficacy endpoint was 30-day clinical success defined as absence of bleeding from target lesion after embolization without need for emergency surgery, re-embolization, or other target lesion re-interventions. Secondary endpoints included serious adverse events and mortality. Results113 patients (mean age 57.4 years [SD 18.0; range 18.0-93.0]; 63.7% male) with 148 lesions were enrolled at 19 US centers. Targeted areas included non-gastrointestinal (GI) visceral arteries (31.1%), kidneys (26.3%), upper GI (11.5%), lower GI (6.8%) and extremities (6.1%). Empiric embolization was performed for 20.9% of lesions. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 94.3% of lesions (95.3% patients), exceeding the performance goal of 72%. Two target lesions treated with EVOH required subsequent re-embolization. No surgeries were performed for bleeding or ischemia. There were no MAEs reported per study definition. All-cause mortality rate at 30 days was 8.3%. ConclusionsThe LAVA study suggests that EVOH is effective and can be safely used as an embolic agent for treatment of PAH.

Safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan treatment for cold agglutinin disease and warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) are rare autoimmune hemolytic anemias characterized by red blood cell destruction, largely attributable to complement activation resulting in intravascular and extravascular hemolysis. Pegcetacoplan is a subcutaneously administered C3-targeted therapy, which may be suitable for treating CAD and wAIHA. In this open-label phase 2 study, analyses were conducted in two cohorts, one for patients with CAD and the other wAIHA. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive 270 or 360 mg/day pegcetacoplan for up to 48 weeks. Safety endpoints included the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI). Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb), lactate dehydrogenase, absolute reticulocyte count, haptoglobin, indirect bilirubin, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue scale. Thirteen (100%) and 10 out of 11 (91%) patients with CAD and wAIHA respectively experienced at least 1 TEAE. Ten patients had at least 1 serious adverse event; none were considered related to pegcetacoplan. The only treatment-related AESIs were injection site reactions. Pegcetacoplan increased Hb levels, reduced hemolysis, and increased FACIT-fatigue scale scores in the first weeks; at week 48 the median (interquartile range) change from baseline Hb for the CAD and wAIHA total groups was 2.4 (0.90 to 3.00) and 1.7 g/dL (-1.40 to 2.90), respectively, and improvements in hemolysis and FACIT-fatigue scale scores were maintained. This study demonstrated that pegcetacoplan is generally well tolerated and suggests it can be effective in patients with CAD and wAIHA. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03226678).

Coronary Sinus Narrowing for TreatingRefractory Angina: REDUCER-I Multicenter "Real-World" Observational Study Primary Endpoint Analysis.

Patients with refractory angina are often ineligible for revascularization and have poor quality of life despite optimal medical therapy. The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer (Shockwave Medical Inc) was safe and effective in the treatment of refractory angina in the COSIRA (Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina) randomized sham-controlled trial. This study sought to perform the primary endpoint analysis of the complete REDUCER-I (An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer System) study cohort. REDUCER-I is a nonrandomized, "real-world" study of patients with refractory angina treated with the CS Reducer conducted at 25 centers from 9 European countries. The primary effectiveness endpoint was an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class at 6months. The primary safety endpoints were major adverse cardiac events and device- or procedure-related serious adverse events through 30days. Study follow-up is planned through 5 years with some interim 3-year analyses included here. From 2016 to 2023, 400 patients were enrolled, including 78.0% (312/400) male patients, 54.3% (216/398) with previous myocardial infarction, 73.6% (293/398) with previous revascularization, and 72.0% (280/389) CCS class III/IV. Major adverse cardiac event and serious adverse event rates were 1.6% (95%CI: 0.7-3.6) and 1.1% (4/371), respectively, with no deaths within 30days. At 6months, 69.8% (240/344) of patients improved by≥1 CCS class. Six-minute walk distances improved by 34.1 ± 85.8m at 6months (P< 0.0001). Interim 3-year results showed CCS class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality of life improvements were sustained (P< 0.0001). The complete primary endpoint analysis of the REDUCER-I study shows patients with refractoryangina were safely and effectively treated with the CS Reducer. Improvements in angina and quality of lifeappear sustained through 3 years.

A European, Observational, 3-Year Cohort Comparative Study on the Safety of the Fixed Dose Combination Pravastatin 40 mg/Fenofibrate 160 mg vs. Statin Alone in Real Clinical Practice: The POSE Study.

The aim of the study was to provide valuable real-world long-term safety data of the fixed pravastatin 40 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg combination in comparison of monotherapy with statins of moderate intensity. POSE study was an observational, comparative study conducted in three European countries. Patients treated or planned to be treated with pravastatin 40 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg or with a moderate-intensity statin in monotherapy were assessed over 3 years. The main safety endpoints included the incidence of renal or urinary disorder, musculoskeletal or connective tissue disorder, hepatobiliary disorder and cardiovascular events. The study included 3075 patients treated for dyslipidaemia, with diabetes mellitus (47%), hypertension (56%) and/or established cardiovascular disease (61%). Over the 3 years of follow-up, the difference in incidence rate of safety events between the pravastatin 40 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg group and the statin group was not statistically significant (RR = 1.366 [95% CI = 0.967-1.929]). The most frequently occurring events were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (AR = 0.030 in the pravastatin 40 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg group and 0.024 in the statin group), renal and urinary disorders (AR = 0.019 vs. 0.016, respectively) and aggravated diabetes mellitus (0.021 vs. 0.014). Most events occurred during the first year, then incidence decreased over the 3-year period. No statistically significant difference was observed between treatment groups regarding the cardiovascular events (RR = 1.209 [95% CI = 0.596-2.453]) and no new signal emerged from the long-term follow-up. This study demonstrates a reassuring long-term safety profile of the fixed pravastatin 40 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg combination in routine clinical practice, with low and similar incidence of events over the 3 years follow-up compared to a monotherapy with statins of moderate intensity.

Efficacy and Safety of Sotagliflozin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and CKD.

This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin, a dual SGLT1&2 inhibitor, added to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We used data from the 52-week pooled inTandem1&2 trials and the 24-week inTandem3 trial to assess the effects of sotagliflozin (200mg [inTandem 1&2 only] or 400mg daily) versus placebo on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; primary endpoint), body weight, systolic blood pressure (BP), insulin dose, and safety endpoints including adjudicated severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), stratified by CKD. CKD was identified in 237/1575 of inTandem1&2 participants and 228/1402 of inTandem3 participants. At week-24, significant, placebo-adjusted reductions in HbA1c were observed - inTandem1&2: Non-CKD subgroup (sotagliflozin 200mg: -0.4%, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.3; 400mg: -0.4%, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.3) and CKD subgroup (sotagliflozin 200mg: -0.4%, 95% CI -0.6 to -0.1; 400mg: -0.3%, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1). For systolic BP, there was a significant reduction at week-24 with sotagliflozin in the non-CKD subgroup but no effect in the CKD subgroup in inTandem1&2. At week-52, the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was lower with sotagliflozin (7% on 200 mg and 4% on 400 mg) compared to placebo (17%) in the CKD subgroup of inTandem1&2, whereas the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was 5-6% across non-CKD subgroups. The incidence of adjudicated DKA at week-52 was 1%, 5%, and 3% for placebo, 200 mg, and 400 mg in the CKD subgroup compared to 0%, 3%, and 4% in the non-CKD subgroup. Results were generally similar in inTandem3 except systolic BP was significantly reduced with sotagliflozin versus placebo in CKD and non-CKD subgroups. In participants with type 1 diabetes and CKD, sotagliflozin treatment had similar HbA1c, body weight, and systolic BP lowering effects as in participants with type 1 diabetes without CKD. Additionaly, sotagliflozin was associated with a lower to neutral risk of severe hypoglycemia and did not significantly increase the risk of DKA among a small number of DKA events.

Thirty-Day Outcomes from the Disrupt PAD BTK II Study of the Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy System for Treatment of Calcified Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease

Below the knee (BTK) lesions may be particularly challenging to treat owing to length, diffuse disease, and extent of calcification. Landmark interventional clinical studies have not reached consensus on the optimal standard of care for BTK lesions, and many published trials excluded patients with moderate or severe lesion calcification. Calcium modification with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was shown to be superior to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the femoropopliteal artery and successful in treating BTK lesions in pilot studies. The Disrupt BTK II study is a core-lab adjudicated, prospective, multi-center single-arm study of patients with moderate to severely calcified BTK lesions treated with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System. Disrupt BTK II enrolled 250 subjects with calcified infrapopliteal lesions and Rutherford category 3-5 presentation from 38 sites in the United States and Europe. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALE) or post-operative death (POD) at 30 days, a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation of the index limb, and/or major reintervention of the index limb involving an infrapopliteal artery. The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success, defined as ≤50% residual stenosis for all treated target lesions without serious core lab-adjudicated serious angiographic complications. The study used independent angiographic and duplex ultrasound core laboratories, and follow-up is planned through two years. A total of 305 lesions in 250 patients were treated with a procedural success of 97.9%. Mean target lesion length was 76 ± 65mm, diameter stenosis was 78 ± 18%, and 84.8% had moderate or severe calcification as assessed by an independent angiographic core lab. After IVL, residual stenosis was reduced to 29%, and to 26% after optional post-dilatation and/or stent implantation. At 30 days, there were no deaths, MALE rate was 0.8%, and mean improvement in VascuQoL scores was 4.0 ± 5.0 (P<0.0001). Of the patients with baseline wounds, 15.8% healed and 53.4% were improved at 30 days. The Disrupt PAD BTK II study demonstrated that treatment with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System in patients with moderate-severe calcified lesions resulted in high procedural success, significant reduction in residual stenosis, improvements in patient QoL and wound healing, with minimal adverse events at 30-day follow-up.

BRIVA-ONE study: 12-month outcomes of brivaracetam monotherapy in clinical practice.

This study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) monotherapy in a large series of patients with epilepsy. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational, non-interventional study in 24 hospitals across Spain. Patients aged ≥18 years who started on BRV monotherapy, either as first-line or following conversion, at least 1 year before database closure were included. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after initiation of BRV monotherapy, in accordance with usual clinical practice at these centers. Data were collected retrospectively from patients' individual charts by participating physicians. The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were the percentage of seizure-free patients 1 year after initiation of BRV monotherapy and the proportion of patients reporting adverse events (AEs) over the complete follow-up period. Retention rates and subpopulation analysis (levetiracetam switchers, elderly and different etiologies) were also investigated. A total of 276 patients were included (48 with BRV as first-line monotherapy and 228 who converted to BRV monotherapy). The overall retention rate in monotherapy at 12 months was 89.9% (87.5% for first-line monotherapy group; 90.4% for conversion-to-monotherapy group). Seizure-freedom rates at 12 months were 77.8% (75% for first-line monotherapy group; 78.4% for conversion-to-monotherapy group). AEs occurred in 39.5% of patients at 12 months (35.4% for first-line monotherapy group; 40.4% for conversion-to-monotherapy group). Most AEs were mild-to-moderate. The most frequent AEs were irritability (12.3%) and dizziness (10.1%). The most frequent AEs leading to BRV withdrawal were dizziness (1.8%) and memory problems (1.4%). Similar outcomes in terms of effectiveness and tolerability of BRV monotherapy were observed in patients switching from levetiracetam, those with different epilepsy etiologies, and elderly patients. BRV was effective and well tolerated both as first-line monotherapy and following conversion to monotherapy in a real-world setting of patients with epilepsy. The goal of the medical treatment of epilepsy is to ensure best possible patient quality of life, by maximizing seizure control and minimizing medication toxicity. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new-generation epilepsy treatment that is well tolerated by patients. In our study, monotherapy with BRV reduced seizures in patients who had not received other treatments and in patients who switched from a previous treatment to BRV monotherapy. BRV was well tolerated and also effective in sensitive patients (i.e., the elderly and those who had epilepsy caused by a brain tumor or a brain injury).

Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy With Evolocumab for Familial Hypercholesterolemia/Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: A Real-World, Postmarketing, Single-Arm Study.

Evolocumab is the first monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 approved in Japan for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hypercholesterolemia; however, data on its safety and effectiveness in the real-world setting in Japan are limited. This real-world, postmarketing, single-arm study assessed the safety and effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with evolocumab in patients with homozygous/heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan (668 sites). The primary safety end point was the incidence (percentage) and number of patients with adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events during the 104-week follow-up. Primary effectiveness end points included the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from baseline to week 12, assessed using 2-sided paired t tests. The safety and effectiveness sets comprised 3724 (homozygous FH, n=108; heterozygous FH, n=2009; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1607) and 2797 (homozygous FH, n=91; heterozygous FH, n=1615; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1091) patients, respectively. Overall, mean age and disease duration were 63.2 and 12.3 years, respectively. Serious adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events were experienced by 0.5% and 10.3% of patients; the incidence rates of myocardial infarction and stroke were 0.7% and 0.3%, respectively. A significant mean±SD percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels was observed at week 12 among patients with homozygous FH (-45.7%±28.2; P<0.001), heterozygous FH (-55.9%±28.8; P<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia with high risk (-63.3%±23.7; P<0.001). Evolocumab was well tolerated, and real-world patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan had sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02808403.

Coronary sinus reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: a single center experience

Abstract Introduction The coronary sinus Reducer emerged as a complementary therapy in patients with angina refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to revascularization. Aim The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients presenting with refractory angina. Methods and population Twenty-six patients with refractory angina, objective evidence of myocardial ischemia attributable to the left coronary artery and deemed unsuitable for revascularization were treated with Reducer at a single center between April 2018 and January 2023. Safety endpoints were procedural success and complications. Efficacy endpoints, assessed at 6-month, were a reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina (CCS) class and a reduction in pharmacological antianginal therapy. Results Twenty-one (81%) patients had end-stage coronary artery disease without targets for further revascularization (13 had previous CABG ± PCI and 8 had only PCI) and 5 patients had microvascular disease without epicardial stenosis. All procedures were performed via right jugular vein. The mean procedure and fluoroscopy duration were 66±29 and 19±8 minutes. Procedural success was achieved in all patients, with no device related complications. There was one cardiac tamponade, promptly treated with pericardiocentesis. Regarding the efficacy endpoint, 21 patients (81%) had at least 1 grade reduction in CCS class, 13 patients (50%) had at least 2 class reductions, and 7 patients (28 %) became asymptomatic, with a mean reduction of CCS class of 1.4±0.9, from 2.6±0.5 to 1.2±0.9 (p=0.001) at 6-month follow-up. During this time frame, twelve patients (46%) withdrew or reduced the dose of at least one anti-anginal drug. The mean reduction of anti-anginal drugs was 0.54 ±0.86, from 3.5±1.02 to 2.9±1.07 (p=0.04). Conclusion In this real-world, single-center experience, implantation of Reducer was safe and associated with improvement of angina and reduction of anti-anginal drugs intake in patients with refractory angina unsuitable for revascularization.

Moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy for secondary cardiovascular risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol levels is recommended for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [1]. Statins are the first-line therapy for secondary prevention [1]. Recent studies such as the RACING trial suggest that the combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe (MIS+EZE) may achieve a greater LDL cholesterol reduction and a lower adverse event rate than high-intensity statins alone (HIS) [2]. Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess cardiovascular outcomes and clinical safety of MIS+EZE versus HIS in patients with ASCVD. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for studies that compared MIS+EZE to HIS in patients with ASCVD and included studies reporting cardiovascular mortality, all cause mortality, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, heart failure, and LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL. Studies with the same statin dose in both treatment groups and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Treatment effects for binary endpoints were compared using pooled risk-ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Out of 6238 studies, we included 6 RCTs and 2 retrospective cohort studies with 40,236 patients of whom 10,254 were treated with MIS+EZE (25,5%). Mean follow-up ranged from 90 days to 3 years. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.94; p=0.003), all-cause mortality (RR 0.90; CI95% 0.82-0.98; p=0.02) and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.93; p=0.002) were significantly lower in patients treated with MIS+EZE compared to those treated with HIS. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the MIS+EZE group reached an LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL (RR 1.26; CI95% 1.19-1.34; p&amp;lt;0.00001). No statistically significant difference was found for non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.87; CI95% 0.64-1.17; p=0.36), coronary revascularization (RR 1.03; CI95% 0.78-1.35; p=0.83), heart failure (RR 0.95; CI95% 0.86-1.06; p=0.38) and unstable angina (RR 1.52; CI95% 0.62-3.75; p=0.36). A RCT sub-analysis was feasible for cardiovascular mortality and showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (RR 1.01; CI95% 0.42-2.42; p=0.98). Regarding safety endpoints, the risk of adverse events (RR 0.84; CI95% 0.74-0.95; p=0.004) and the risk of muscle-related adverse events (RR 0.67; CI95% 0.49-0.92; p=0.01) were significantly lower in MIS+EZE group. The significant reduction in muscle-related adverse events was maintained in the RCT sub-analysis (RR 0.61; CI95% 0.41-0.91; p=0.02). There was no difference between groups in the risk of liver-related adverse events (RR 0.63; CI95% 0.29-1.41; p=0.26) or new-onset malignancy (RR 0.99; CI95% 0.87-1.12; p=0.85). Conclusion The combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe may be considered as an alternative therapeutic strategy to reduce secondary cardiovascular risk with lower rates of drug intolerance.

Anticoagulant monotherapy versus anticoagulant therapy in combination with single antiplatelet agent in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting - analysis of real-world data

Abstract Introduction Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in a significant group chronic anticoagulant treatment is indicated. Current recommendations from scientific societies do not clearly indicate the optimal antithrombotic treatment strategy in this group of patients. Addition of antiplatelet therapy recommended after CABG to chronic anticoagulant therapy increases the risk of bleeding complications, however, efficacy of antithrombotic treatment strategies has not been compared in large prospective studies. Purpose The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of post-CABG antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients after CABG with coexisting indications for chronic anticoagulant treatment, based on the analysis of the real-world database. Methods Real-world data from the THIN database were analyzed. The population included adult patients from France and Great Britain undergoing CABG between 2010 and 2022 who were treated with anticoagulants within a year after CABG and who were followed for at least one year after CABG or until death. The endpoints were compared between groups of patients treated with anticoagulants in monotherapy (VKA or NOAC) (MT) and patients treated with anticoagulants (VKA or NOAC) in combination with antiplatelet agent (ASA or oral P2Y12 inhibitor) (CT). The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding and the secondary safety endpoint was death from any cause. Results A database query obtained records of 3500 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, but due to missing data, 710 patients were included in the analysis. In this group, 193 (27.2%) patients were in MT group, and 517 (72.8%) in CT group. The majority (87.0%) were men, the mean age was 72.8 (9.4) years. The MACE occurred in 19.2% patients in the MT and in 19.3% in the CT. There was no significant effect of antithrombotic treatment strategy on time to event (log-rank test p=0.553) and on risk of MACE occurrence (HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.61 - 1.31) for CT vs. MT). The major bleeding occurred in 6.2% patients in the MT and in 10.3% in the CT and no significant effect of group was observed (log-rank test p=0.170, HR 1.55 [95% CI 0.83 - 2.90] for CT vs. MT). The death from any cause occurred in 10.9% patients in the MT and in 10.1% in the CT and no significant effect of group was observed (log-rank test p=0.174, HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.42 - 1.17] for CT vs. MT). Conclusions The results indicate the comparable efficacy and safety of both antithrombotic treatment strategies: anticoagulants in monotherapy versus anticoagulants in combination with antiplatelet agent in the group of patients after CABG with coexisting indications for chronic anticoagulation.

A Bayesian reanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.

The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS), and multivessel disease remains controversial. The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial compared culprit lesion-only vs. immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), providing important data but leaving efficacy questions unresolved. To address lingering uncertainties and gain deeper insights, we performed a Bayesian reanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data. We conducted a Bayesian re-analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data using non-informative, sceptical, and enthusiastic priors. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals were calculated. We defined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as RR < 0.84. We performed subgroup analyses for key patient characteristics and assessed secondary outcomes and safety endpoints. Probabilities of benefit, achieving MCID, and harm were computed. Results are presented as median RR with probabilities of effect sizes. Bayesian reanalysis showed a median RR of 0.82 (95% HPD 0.66-1.04) with a non-informative prior, indicating a 95% probability of benefit and 59% probability of achieving MCID. Subgroup analyses revealed potentially stronger effects in males (RR 0.78, 73% probability of MCID), patients without diabetes (RR 0.76, 79% probability of MCID), and those with non-anterior ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; RR 0.74, 76% probability of MCID). Secondary outcomes suggested potential benefits in mortality (RR 0.85) and need for renal replacement therapy (RR 0.72) but increased risks of recurrent MI (RR 2.84) and urgent revascularization (RR 2.88). Our Bayesian reanalysis provides intuitive insights by quantifying probabilities of treatment effect sizes, offering further evidence favouring the culprit lesion-only PCI strategy in AMI patients with CS and multivessel disease. The analysis demonstrates a high probability of overall benefit, with a notable chance of achieving a minimally clinically important difference, particularly in specific subgroups. These findings not only support the consideration of culprit lesion-only PCI in certain patient populations but also underscore the need for careful risk-benefit assessment. Furthermore, our hypothesis-generating subgroup analyses, which show varying probabilities of achieving MCID, illuminate promising avenues for future targeted investigations in this critical patient population.

Comparative efficacy of colchicine and intensive LDL-C lowering in patients with ASCVD receiving statins: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background Adding intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering treatments or colchicine to statins resulted in additional cardiovascular benefits. However, the relative efficacy and priority of these agents are unclear. Purpose We aimed to compare the effects of these supplementary agents on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) receiving statins. Methods We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was the main adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarct, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. The safety endpoints were treatment discontinuation and non-cardiovascular death. Colchicine was used as reference treatment. Random-effects model was used in case of high heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model was preferred otherwise. We ranked the comparative effects of all drugs with surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Results 17 trials totaling 85823 participants treated with colchicine, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor and ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor were included. Compared with colchicine, NPC1L1 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of MACE (risk ratio [RR]: 1.39, 1.21-1.59), stroke (RR: 1.81, 1.09-3.00) and coronary revascularization (RR: 1.36, 1.11-1.68), and PCSK9 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of MACE (RR: 1.27, 1.10-1.46). However, NPC1L1 inhibitor (RR: 0.68, 0.48-0.96) and PCSK9 inhibitor (RR: 0.64, 0.44-0.93) were associated with reduced risk of non-cardiovascular death in comparison to colchicine. PCSK9 inhibitors had a lower risk of MACE (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.98) and coronary revascularization (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor. Although no regimen prolonged survival, colchicine had the lowest rank at non-cardiovascular death and the worse performance on all-cause mortality. Conclusions In patients with ASCVD receiving statins, inflammation-inhibiting with colchicine seems to be superior to intensive LDL-C lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitor or NPC1L1 inhibitor in cardiovascular prevention. However, using colchicine as an alternative to intensive lipid-lowering therapy may need to be weighed against the greater cardiovascular benefits and the potential harms of higher non-cardiovascular death. Given the worse performance of colchicine on survival based on current evidence, colchicine may be more appropriate for patients who have been treated with intensive LDL-C-lowering agents but still have recurrent cardiovascular events.Forest plots of included agentsRadar plot of treatments based on SUCRA

The safety and efficacy of indobufen or aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Currently, the standard treatment for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a combination of asprin and clopidogrel. However, the potential benefits of aspirin were limited by an increased risk of bleeding. The safety and efficacy of indobufen, an alternative antiplatelet agents to aspirin, in patients with AMI after PCI are yet to be thoroughly investigated. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and utilized propensity score matching. The enrollment spanned from January 2019 to June 2022, incorporating patients who experienced AMI following PCI. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their medication: the aspirin DAPT group and the indobufen DAPT group. The primary endpoint focused on net adverse clinical event (NACE) at one year, defined as a composite outcome, including cardiac death, recurrence of MI, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria type 2, 3, or 5. Results A total of 1451 patients were enrolled in this study, with 258 assigned to the indobufen DAPT group and 1193 to the aspirin DAPT group. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 224 patients were retained in each group and postmatching absolute standardized differences were consistantly below 10% for all covariates (Figure 1). The primary endpoint occurred in 58 (25.9%) individuals in indobufen DAPT group and 52 (23.2%) in the aspirin DAPT group (HR 1.128, 95% CI 0.776-1.639, p = 0.527, Figure 2). Specifically, no significant differences were observed in either the efficacy endpoint (MACCE, 20.1% vs. 14.7%, HR 1.392, 95% CI 0.893-2.170, p = 0.146) or the safety endpoint (BARC 2,3 or 5, 8.04% vs. 10.30%, HR 0.779, p=0.427). Conclusions The results of our study reveal no noteworthy distinctions in primary and secondary endpoints between the two groups. This finding indicates that the efficacy and safety of indobufen may be comparable to aspirin in Chinese patients with AMI after PCI, supporting its consideration as a potential substitute for aspirin in patients with AMI after PCI.

A new hydration strategy can reduce contrast-induced acute kidney injury after PCI in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease: a two-center randomized controlled trial

Abstract Backgrounds Adequate hydration is crucial for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current guidelines recommend half-volume hydration for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) to prevent pulmonary edema. Thus, it is challenging to administer hydration therapy in patients with CHF and CKD. This study was aimed to compare different hydration strategies in this subset of patients. Methods This two-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolled 303 CHF (patients with elevated natriuretic peptide levels and/or objective evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion) patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 15-60 mL/min/1.73m2) undergoing selective coronary angiography (CAG) from two tertiary hospitals from October 2020 to December 2023. Patients were randomized into three groups: half-volume hydration group (HH group, 0.5 mL/Kg/h hydration), standard hydration group (SH group, 1 mL/Kg/h hydration), and standard hydration with diuretic group (SH+D group, 1 mL/Kg/h hydration + immediate postoperative intravenous injection of furosemide 20 mg). All patients received hydration from 6 to 12 hours before to 24 hours after the procedure. The primary endpoint was CI-AKI, defined as a serum creatinine (SCr) increase of more than 0.3 mg/dL or 1.5-1.9 times greater than the baseline 48-72 hours after CAG. Safety endpoints included pulmonary edema during hydration, perioperative mortality, and the need for dialysis. Results A total of 101 patients were included in each group. Baseline characteristics (mean age, proportion of males, left ventricular ejection fraction and eGFR) were similar among groups. SCr, cystatin C levels, and SCr level changes between 48 and 72 hours after procedure did not significantly differ among groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). The incidence of CI-AKI was highest in the HH group (22.8%), lowest in the SH+D group (11.9%), and intermediate in the SH group (17.8%) (P = 0.041). Regarding safety endpoints, there were 2 patients in the HH group, 3 patients in the SH group and 1 patient in the SH+D group experienced heart failure or pulmonary edema during hydration, with no statistically significant differences among the groups (P = 0.874). Perioperative mortality occurred in 1 patient in the HH group and 2 patients in the SH+D group, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.776). No patient required renal replacement therapy. Conclusions In CHF patients with CKD, the half-volume hydration regimen recommended by guidelines was associated with a higher incidence of CI-AKI compared to standard hydration. However, standard hydration combine with diuretic fails to reduce the risk of heart failure during hydration or perioperative mortality, even if this novel strategy does not increase the risk of CI-AKI compared to standard hydration therapy.

Characterisation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship of milvexian in total knee replacement patients

Abstract Background Milvexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, is currently being evaluated in patients at risk for thrombotic events due to atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke, or acute coronary syndrome. The exposure-response relationship between clinical efficacy and safety endpoints and milvexian pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics was recently submitted as a separate publication. Characterisation of the relationship between the coagulation pharmacodynamic (PD) markers versus milvexian PK metrics at the patient level has yet to be reported. Purpose This analysis characterised the relationship between the coagulation biomarkers, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT), and milvexian systemic exposure in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) evaluated in the AXIOMATIC-TKR study. Methods A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was previously developed and characterised the PK of milvexian in TKR patients well. The PK/PD relationships between observed aPTT and PT versus PopPK model estimated time-matched milvexian plasma concentrations via nonlinear mixed effects modeling. The relationship between key clinical safety endpoints (e.g., any bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) and individual PD marker change (e.g., aPTT ratio to baseline) was also explored. Results The aPTT increased with increasing plasma concentration of milvexian over the range of doses evaluated in the study (25mg QD to 200mg BID). An Emax type of model reasonably characterised the PK/PD relationship between the aPTT and model predicted time-matched milvexian plasma concentration, which is consistent with previously observed relationships in healthy volunteers. No change was observed in PT with increased milvexian exposure. No obvious relationship was identified between any (including clinically relevant non-major) bleeding and aPTT ratio to baseline. Conclusions Increased milvexian exposure is directly correlated with aPTT prolongation over the range of doses evaluated in the TKR study. There was no obvious relationship between any (including clinically relevant non-major) bleeding and aPTT ratio. The PK/PD relationship of aPTT without a parallel relationship in PT distinguishes milvexian, a FXIa inhibitor, from previously studied FXa inhibitors. These analyses were a complementary component in dose selection for the milvexian Phase 3 program. Figure 1. PK/PD relationship between aPTT (left) and PT (right) and estimated time-matched plasma concentration (AXIOMATIC-TKR study)