This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in treating gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science identified 86 eligible studies, including 68,755 patients (20,894 in the RG group and 47,861 in the LG group). The analysis revealed that RG was associated with superior outcomes in several areas: more lymph nodes were harvested, intraoperative blood loss was reduced, postoperative hospital stays were shorter, and the time to first flatus and oral intake was shortened (all p<0.001). Additionally, RG resulted in lower incidences of conversion to open surgery (OR=0.62, p=0.004), reoperation (OR=0.68, p=0.010), overall postoperative complications (OR=0.82, p<0.001), severe complications (OR=0.65, p<0.001), and pancreatic complications (OR=0.60, p=0.004). However, RG had longer operative times and higher costs (both p<0.001). No significant differences were found between RG and LG in terms of resection margin distance, mortality, anastomotic leakage, or recurrence rates. RG is a safe and effective surgical option for patients of GC, but further improvements in operative duration and costs are needed.