Sacrospinous Fixation Research Articles

Assessing the Use of a Training Model Using Immersive Virtual Reality for Sacrospinous Fixation Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Sacrospinous fixation (SSF) is a surgical complex procedure for uterovaginal prolapse that may result in pudendal plexus and vascular damage. The objective was to evaluate a training model using virtual reality to perform SSF. We conducted a prospective single-center pilot study in the university's academic innovation department in November 2023. We recruited 20 participants, 10 gynecology resident surgeons (group 1) and 10 experienced gynecology surgeons (group 2). The mean age was 26.6 ± 0.6years in group 1 and 39.7 ± 3.1years in group 2. The satisfaction rate reached 90% in both groups. A scale from 1 to 4 (1 = not-at-all, 4 = completely) was used to assess participants' perceptions. The realism of the simulation was rated at 3.3 ± 0.1 in group 1 and 3.5 ± 0.2 in group 2 (p = 0.41), the haptic feedback was rated at 2.0 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.3 (p = 0.66), the mean exercise time was 6.4 ± 1.3min and 4.8 ± 0.7min (p = 0.58), and the mean success rate was 70.8 ± 3.2% and 83.5 ± 6.8% (p = 0.14). In group 2, left and right instruments were placed at 2.6 ± 0.8mm and 2.9 ± 0.7mm from the target respectively, and in group 1 at 4.8 ± 0.7mm and 3.8 ± 0.5mm respectively. Participants reported greater comfort in performing sacrospinous fixation after simulation training (3.0 ± 0.2 versus 2.3 ± 0.3, p = 0.17). Our virtual reality simulation model is feasible and accurate for SSF training for both residents and experienced surgeons with a high level of satisfaction. Virtual reality simulation improves technical skills and promotes surgical comfort.

Comparative analysis of methods of surgical correction of post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND: The incidence of prolapse after hysterectomy requiring surgical intervention is estimated at 36 cases per 10,000 women. A universal surgical treatment method for post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse is lacking, prompting the need for new approaches. AIM: To comparatively analyze the results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous fixation, and the developed new method of surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective non-randomized study included 57 patients with stage II, III, or IV symptomatic post-hysterectomy prolapse of the pelvic organs who were admitted at the clinical hospital RZD-Medicine in Tula, Russia, between August 2019 and September 2023. The first group (n=18) consisted of women who underwent surgical correction of post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse in a newly developed method; the second group (n=19) included women who underwent laparoscopic promontofixation according to the conventional technique; and the third group (n=20) involved patients who underwent installation of an apical sling using a UroSling-1 mesh endoprosthesis (Lintex LLC, St. Petersburg). The patients’ quality of life was assessed using specialized validated questionnaires: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires before surgery and 12 and 24 months after surgical correction of PGP. The patients were invited for a follow-up examination after 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: The duration of the operation in the second group significantly exceeded the indicators of the first and third groups. The average duration of hospital stay of patients was 4.4±0.6 (95% CI: 4.1–4.7) bed days in the first group, 4.9±1.1 (95% CI: 4.6–5.3) in the second, and 4.6±0.6 (95% CI: 4.3–4.9) in the third. The differences were insignificant (p1–2=0.437; p1–3=0.137; p2–3=0.235). The anatomical results after 24 months at points Aa and Ba showed significant differences. At point Aa, p1–3=0.007 and p2–3=0.004, and at point Ba, p1–3=0.032 and p2–3=0.041. A comparative assessment of the questionnaire data before surgery and 12 and 24 months after surgery showed a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients in the three groups. CONCLUSION: The proposed method of correction of post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse provides high anatomical and functional results and reduces the posibility of repeated surgical intervention for recurrence.

The influence of simultaneous posterior colporrhaphy and perineoplasty on the efficiency and safety of mesh-augmented sacrospinal fixation (apical sling) in advanced POP repair

BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is one of the most common pathologies of the pelvic floor, and it can be found among 40–60% of women who have given birth. Correction of the defect of the DeLancey level II without reconstruction of the apical defect is doomed to failure. Also, in the structure of pelvic floor defects, there is often an incompetency of the perineal body, as a consequence of traumatic delivery. Perineoplasty is considered to be the main method of correction for perineal body incompetency. However, it is worth mentioning that there are no randomized trials, which estimate the influence of simultaneous correction of the perineal body on the effectiveness of transvaginal apical fixation.MethodsIt is planned to include 310 patients in this trial. Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized into 2 groups: 1st group—patients who will undergo mesh-augmented sacrospinal fixation with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy without perineoplasty, 2nd group—patients who will undergo mesh-augmented sacrospinal fixation with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and perineoplasty. Patients will be called to an appointment 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.DiscussionThe aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of simultaneous perineoplasty on the clinical and anatomical efficacy of mesh-augmented sacrospinal fixation in advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair. Based on previous studies, it was difficult to estimate and comprehend whether colpoperinoplasty actually reduces the risk of prolapse recurrence.Trial registrationNCT05422209. Registered on 18 May 2022.

Bilateral Sacrospinous Vaginal Vault Fixation With Synthetic Mesh Arms: A Novel Technique

Sacrospinous ligament suspension is used for suspension of apical prolapse; however, it has a high rate of recurrence compared with sacrocolpopexy, and a high rate of pain compared with uterosacral suspension. We developed a novel surgical procedure of bilateral sacrospinous vaginal vault fixation with synthetic mesh arms. We previously demonstrated its safety, and in Supplementary video 1, we describe a step-by-step surgical approach that could be replicated. This technique restores support, creating an anatomically correct midline configuration of the vaginal axis with minimal tension. A randomized controlled trial is underway to examine durability of mesh versus suture techniques for sacrospinous ligament suspension.

Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year results of sacrospinous ligament suspension as primary repair for apical prolapse and to evaluate long-term side effects. A retrospective study analyzed 10-year follow-up after prolapse repair using sacrospinous ligament suspension. A subjective recurrence was identified as the postoperative occurrence of swelling symptoms based on a particular item on the Italian Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. An objective recurrence was defined as a postoperative decline to stage II or below in any compartment based on the POP-Q system or the requirement for additional surgery. The assessment of postoperative subjective satisfaction was conducted using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score. In total, 40 patients underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation. Objective recurrence was remarkably high, as it was observed in 17 (56.7%) patients. Subjective recurrence was reported by ten (33.3%) women, and reintervention occurred in two (6.7%) of patients. From the point of view of quality of life, according to the PGI-I, twenty-three (76.7%) patients described some degree of improvement after surgery, four (13.3%) described their status as unmodified, and three (10%) reported some form of worsening after primary treatment. Transvaginal repair with sacrospinous fixation is a long-lasting option for prolapse repair, with improvement in every POP-q parameter. Some degree of anterior recurrence, recurrence of symptoms with swelling, or an overall worsening of quality of life after surgery is possible.

Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study

PurposeHysterectomy may be a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We assessed the risk of recurrent POP (operations and visits) after hysterectomy among women with previous POP. We also studied patient and operation related risk factors for POP recurrence.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1697 women having previous POP diagnosis or POP at the time of hysterectomy (FINHYST 2006 cohort). Follow-up was until the end of 2016. The data was derived from the Finnish National Care register linked to the cohort. Hysterectomy approaches and other demographics were compared to the risk of a prolapse diagnosis and/or surgery. Cox regression model was used to identify hazard ratios.ResultsFollowing hysterectomy, a total of 280 women (16.5%) had a POP reoperation and 359 (21.2%) had an outpatient visit due to POP. Vaginal vault prolapse repair was the most common POP reoperation (n = 181, 10.7%), followed by anterior wall repair (n = 120, 7.1%). Median time to POP reoperation was 3.7 years. Hysterectomy approach did not affect reoperations or visits. Previous cesarean section and anterior repair during hysterectomy were associated with decreased risk, whereas concomitant sacrospinous fixation and uterus prolapse as the main indication led to increased risk of anterior/vault prolapse reoperations. Concomitant posterior repair decreased posterior reoperations and visits, but uterus weight over 500 g caused a fivefold increased risk of posterior prolapse visit. Residential status was associated with elevated risk of any POP reoperations and visits.ConclusionsApproximately one out of five women suffering from POP ensue POP reoperation or visit after hysterectomy. These high rates are independent on hysterectomy approach, but probably indicate that hysterectomy may worsen previous pelvic floor dysfunction.

Safety of an anchor-based device for sacrospinous ligament fixation: A pilot case-control study

Introduction and hypothesisSacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a popular surgical technique for treating apical prolapse. The use of suture-capturing devices (SCD), or the more recently introduced anchor-based device (ABD), is useful for a posterior approach but essential for an anterior one. The aim of our study was to assess the safety of the ABD, which was recently introduced to our unit, compared to the traditionally used SCD. MethodsThis was a pilot case-control study of 40 patients who had a SSLF, 20 of these represented all the patients who had the procedure with the aid of the ABD and 20 patients who had the procedure using the SCD over approximately the same duration. The main safety endpoints of this pilot study were patient reported postoperative pain scores and perioperative complications rate. ResultsThe population characteristics were similar. The mean postoperative pain scores differed significantly only on postoperative day 1 in favor of the suture capturing device (3.40 [2.60] vs 1.60 [1.64], p = 0.013). The mean highest pain score was similar in both groups. Peri-operative complications rates were low and comparable between both groups. According to POPQ at 6 weeks follow-up the median Ba point was higher in the ABD group and this difference was significant (−3.00 [-3.00; −2.25] vs. −2.00 [-3.00; −1.50]; p = 0.03). ConclusionThe anchor-based device for sacrospinal ligament fixation seems to have comparable safety profile to the traditionally used suture capturing devices.

The minimally invasive sacrospinous fixation under visual guidance: An anatomical study

ObjectiveSacrospinous fixation is the gold standard procedure for management of apical pelvic organ prolapse by the vaginal route. However, there may be a relevant risk of neurovascular injury due to the proximity of neurovascular structures. We propose an anatomical study concerning the sacrospinous ligament with a new innovative minimally invasive technology using both a suture capturing device and a chip-on-the-tip endoscope to perform sacropinous fixation.Study design: Bilateral sacrospinous fixation was performed in three female cadavers, in the course of the anatomical study conducted with a specific device (the Suture Capturing I Stitch™ Device) under real time visual guidance with a chip-on -the-tip endoscope, the NanoScope™ system. ResultsIdentification of ischial spine and sacrospinous ligament as well as feasibility of sacrospinous fixation under NanoScope™ control were always possible on both sides. ConclusionsThis new innovative minimally invasive technology using both a suture capturing device and a chip-on-the-tip endoscope is relevant and could be an advantage in terms of safety and better placement of the suture on the sacrospinous ligament.

Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice

Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice

Унилатеральная гибридная хирургическая реконструкция тазового дна. Модифицированная лоскутная методика

Sacrospinous fixation is one of the most studied treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but the prevention of implantrelated complications remains unresolved. To isolate the mesh materials from the incision line and to prevent the development of chronic pelvic pain syndrome due to rigid fixation, a modification of hybrid pelvic floor reconstruction was performed, where a U-shaped vascularized vaginal flap acts as the main fixation point of the mesh implant. Objective. To study the efficacy and safety of a modified flap technique for unilateral hybrid pelvic floor surgical reconstruction. Patients and methods. A database of 128 case histories was generated. Inclusion criteria: apical anterior prolapse (POP-Q: Ba, C ≥ 0), hybrid pelvic floor surgical reconstruction using mesh endoprosthesis and vascularized vaginal flap performed between May 2020 and September 2022. The variables under study included POP stage, results of the PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and ICIQ-SF questionnaires, intraoperative complications. Patients who underwent surgery were invited for consultation. The following parameters were evaluated: POP stage, presence of mesh erosion, de novo dyspareunia, de novo chronic pelvic pain, de novo functional disorders (an overactive or atonic bladder, stress urinary incontinence (SUI), defecation disorders), repeat surgeries for POP and SUI. The PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and ICIQ-SF questionnaires were filled in. Satisfaction with treatment was assessed using the PGI-I scale. Four patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs. Results. The results showed a significant improvement in the quality of life after surgery in 113 (96.6%) cases. Only 3 (2.6%) patients had persistent POP symptoms. Of the 117 patients with baseline moderate or severe urinary incontinence, 45 (38.5%) showed improvement in 41 (91.1%) cases. Assessment of the quality of sexual life showed improvement in 27 (77.1%) of 35 patients, and 4 patients returned to sexual activity after surgery. Satisfaction with the results of treatment was noted in 109 (93.2%) patients. Conclusion. Flap modification for unilateral hybrid pelvic floor surgical reconstruction is an effective and safe method of preventing the development of implant-related complications in the correction of POP. Key words: pelvic organ prolapse, mesh implant, vaginal flap

COMET (Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs suture Techniques for prolapse repair)- Protocol for a single blind randomized controlled multicenter trial testing surgical innovation in female pelvic surgery.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) increases in incidence and severity with aging. At least 1 in 4 women seek pelvic floor care and many more suffer with concurrent symptoms of bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction, which can have a large impact on quality of life. It is estimated that 1 in 5 women will undergo surgery for POP. POP is difficult to cure with existing surgeries and therefore treatment failure and reoperations are common. Surgical innovation in this area is urgently needed and we have developed a novel technique of bilateral sacrospinous vaginal vault fixation with synthetic mesh arms (BSSVF-M). Based on preliminary studies it may be more successful, durable and cost-effective than standard sacrospinous ligament suspension with sutures (SSLS). Preliminary development and exploration studies showed safety and efficacy of BSSVF-M. Following an established framework for research in surgical innovations, we now wish to conduct a randomized comparative effectiveness trial for assessment of this novel technique. This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial in Canada comparing the surgical techniques of BSSVF-M vs. SSLS to address apical prolapse. In total, 358 women with symptomatic POP at five centers will be randomized with 80% power to detect a 15% difference in primary composite outcome and accounting for a 15% loss to follow-up over 2 years. The primary objective is to investigate BSSVF-M vs. SSLS using an established composite of 3 objective signs and 1 subjective symptom of POP measured 2 years postoperatively. Secondary objectives: 1) To determine changes in condition-specific pelvic symptoms, quality of life, pain and condition-specific body image post BSSVF-M vs. SSLS using validated questionnaires; 2) To determine changes in sexuality post BSSVF-M vs. SSLS; 3) To determine global impression of improvement, adverse events (validated classification scheme), reoperations and health utility post BSSVF-M vs. SSLS; 4) To determine the cost-effectiveness of BSSVF-M vs SSLS. Study Registration at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02965313). There is a need for innovation to improve the surgical approach to vaginal apical suspension. Despite controversies with mesh, it has been shown to be safe when used appropriately and to have higher durability when compared with sutures. As well, the importance of restoring anatomy and tension-free surgical approach in pelvic reconstructive surgery has led to better long-term outcomes and fewer side effects. These principles have been applied when developing the novel BSSVF-M technique. Anticipated challenges of this trial include recruitment, compliance problems and loss to follow up However, the robust methodology will provide evidence on the best surgical approach to correct POP, a common condition among aging women.

Surgical treatment of genital prolapse in combination with endometrial hyperplastic processes in postmenopausal women

Aim. To study the long-term results of surgical treatment of postmenopausal patients with genital prolapse III and IV according to the POP-Q classification in combination with endometrial hyperplastic processes and to assess their quality of life.
 Materials and methods. Fifty one elderly and senile patients with grade III–IV prolapse according to the POP-Q classification in combination with endometrial hyperplastic processes. 2 groups were formed: 1st – 21 patients after one-stage vaginal extirpation of the uterus with appendages and unilateral sacrospinous fixation of the vaginal stump with a synthetic endoprosthesis-tape in combination with reconstruction of II and III levels of pelvic floor support according to DeLancey; 2nd – 30 patients after one-stage vaginal extirpation of the uterus with appendages and median colporrhaphy using the Lefort and Neugebauer technique.
 Results. The study was evaluated 1–7 years after surgical treatment. The average age of patients at the time of surgery in group 1 was 63.12±4.32 years, in group 2 – 74.2±3.28 years. The number of women with somatic pathology in the 1st group was 1.7 times less in percentage terms than in the 2nd. The disappearance of symptoms of an overactive bladder after surgery was noted by 4 (50.0%) of 8 patients of the 1st group and 4 (26.7%) of 15 women of the 2nd. Uroflowmetry after surgical treatment showed an increase in the maximum flow rate (Qmax) and a decrease in the volume of residual urine (Vom) in both groups (p0.001). Recurrence of genital prolapse was detected in the apical region in 1 (4.8%) woman, prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall in 1 (4.8%). There were no recurrences of genital prolapse in the 2nd group. A significant improvement in the quality of life after surgery, according to the results of processing the PFDI-20 questionnaire, was noted by 19 (90.5%) women in the 1st group and 29 (96.7%) – in the 2nd.
 Conclusion. The long-term results of the proposed operational benefits have shown satisfactory results and can be successfully used in the elderly and senile age. The choice of the volume of surgery taking into account age, sexual activity, concomitant gynecological and somatic pathology reduces the number of complications and improves the results of surgical treatment in this category of patients.

Outcomes of Lightweight Mesh Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Objective: The research objective is to present and evaluate 3 years of experience in sacrospinal fixation using polypropylene mesh in the surgical treatment of genital prolapse in women. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated perioperative and mid-term outcomes in 68 women who underwent transvaginal sacroscopic cervicocolpopexy with lightweight polypropylene mesh for stage II-IV prolapse with apical involvement. Anatomical outcomes, complications, and symptoms were assessed using POP-Q staging and validated questionnaires preoperatively and at 12 and 36 months postoperatively. Results: No intraoperative complications were observed. In the long-term postoperative period, the following were observed: vaginal wall erosion in transvaginal Mesh-systems placement along the postoperative suture line at 2.9 % (2/68), and chronic pelvic pain at 2.9 % (2/68). The percentage of anatomical success in restoring the position of the apical vaginal segment was 98.5 % (67/68) 12 months after surgery and remained unchanged after 36 months of follow-up.

Levator Ani Avulsion in Ultrasound Increases Recurrence in Sacrospinous Fixation.

Pelvic floor translabial ultrasound (TLUS) can identify levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and ballooning, which some studies have shown to be possible risk factors for prolapse recurrence. Our group uses TLUS to counsel patients preoperatively. If any of these risk factors exist, we offer sacrocolpopexy over vaginal repair. However, some patients, even though they have these possible risk factors, prefer to undergo vaginal surgery. The objective of this study was to determine if TLUS LAM avulsion and/or ballooning are risk factors for composite outcome recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse. This was a retrospective observational study. All patients with vaginal apical repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation with preoperative TLUS were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for composite outcome that included TLUS risk factors, age, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System measurements and stage, and variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis. Eighty-two patients were included. All patients had symptomatic vaginal bulge; 65.4% had stage III prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 54.3%. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range, 8-35 months); 19.8% had LAM avulsion, and 43.2% had ballooning. Anatomic recurrence rate was 23.5%, symptomatic was 22.2%, and reoperation was 1.2%. The composite recurrence rate was 29.6%. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unilateral/bilateral avulsion in TLUS was found to be a significant risk factor for composite outcome with an odds ratio of 4.33 (confidence interval, 1.219-15.398; P = 0.023). Composite outcome of recurrence in our study was 29.6%. Avulsion on TLUS increased the risk of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse by fourfold.

Complications during Vaginal Sacrospinous Fixation along with McCall Culdoplasty in Stage III and IV POP

In Bangladesh, about half a million women are suffering from stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP). With traditional surgical methods, there is a chance of recurrence, especially of apical prolapse. Sacrospinous fixation (SSF) along with MacCall Culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy can reduce this recurrence rate enormously. This study was designed to identify, manage as well as to prevent per-/post-operative complications during SSF. The study period was from August 2017 to December 2021 at Kumudini Women’s Medical College and Hospital, Bangladesh. Total 335 stage III and IV utero-vaginal prolapse cases were included in this study. The surgeries performed were vaginal hysterectomy followed by modified McCall Culdoplasty and right-sided vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) along with anterior and posterior fascial closure and perineorrhaphy. A standard data collection sheet was used to record the information. Per-operatively, main complications were hemorrhage (3.57%) due to vessel injury and rectal injury (0.90%). The immediate early postoperative complication was buttock pain (24%). Of these, in 97.53% cases, pain subsided within 6 weeks with analgesic and counselling. Only one patient had recurrence of apical prolapse within 1st week of operation. It should be concluded that with proper knowledge of anatomy and careful surgical technique, most of the complications can be avoided. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; Vol. 37(2): 90-97

Preoperative, Intraoperative and Postoperative Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Surgical Outcome

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common disease of middle aged and elderly women with an incidence of 7-10% and life time risk for surgery 11 to 20%. Assessing pelvic organ prolapsed in an objective, reproducible and applicable method is essential to have successful surgical outcome. Aim of the study was preoperative, intraoperative pre and postsurgical as well as postoperative assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by POP- Q system in patients undergoing reconstructive surgery and measure optimum surgical outcome stage 0 (Q&lt;-1), Tvl &gt; 4 cm and Genital hiatus (3 to 3.4cm) to prevent recurrence (POP-Q stage &gt; -1) and dyspareunia (Pb d”3 cm). Methods : This was hospital based Prospective study done with 250 patient diagnosed as pelvic organ prolapse at OPD. Excluding 14 patients 236 had surgery in Chattagram Metropolitan Hospital during January 2010 to December 2019. POP-Q measurement was done with Valsalva before anesthesia, intraoperative after anesthesia pre and postsurgical and postoperatively in follow up visit within three months of surgery by same surgeon. All POPQ measurement were done by same surgeon using a wooden Spatula marked in cm (POP-Q popsicle stick). All measurement were recorded in grid form and preoperative &amp; presurgical POP-Q staging was done. The result was then summarized as mean and SD for numerical variable and percentage for categorical variable. Result : A total 236 patient had surgery, 233 had vaginal hysterectomy with Apical vaginal suspension with uterosacral ligament and sacrospinous fixation was done in 3 patients with vault prolapse. Mean age was 51 ± 5SD years (51 to 60 years 51%), 84% sexually active, low socioeconomic group (68%), multiparous 100% mean parity 4 ± 2SD (e” 6 62%), 95% had vaginal delivery with history of home delivery 89%, resuming house hold work within two weeks of delivery in 97% cases. Most were postmenopausal 96%. All intraoperative presurgical measurement except Pb and Tvl showed significant higher descent as compared to preoperative finding before anesthesia, mean difference were Aa 0.7, Ba1.6, C 1.6, Ap 0.25 Bp 1.6 D1.6 Gh. 8cm with highest descent in Ba C, D Bp. Immediate postsurgical measurement all patient showed optimum anatomical outcome (stage 0). But follow up within 3 month (10 to 90 days) 13 patient showed satisfactory anatomical outcome (stage 1 Q&lt;-1)) with no recurrence (Q&gt;-1) nor dyspareunia. Total vaginal length and Pb no change in measurement before and after anesthesia but Tvl reduced by 2.3 cm and Pb increased by .3cm postsurgical. Presurgical measurementof Gh increased by. 8cm but reduced to 3.5 cm postsurgical. No significant difference in postsurgical intraoperative measurements during follow up within 3 months except Gh (3.2 cm) which is narrower even with valsalva menovure. Conclusion : POP-Q technique in assessment of Pelvic organ prolapse was anatomically site specific and is with good reproducibility and less intra and inter observer variation. Significant difference in descent alert surgeon to plan surgical technique to have optimum anatomical outcome and prevent recurrence and dysparunea. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; Vol. 37(2): 109-118

A comparison between the vaginal patch plastron associated with the anterior sacrospinous fixation and the Uphold™ LITE vaginal support system for the treatment of advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare efficacy and safety of the vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to the anterior sacrospinous fixation (SSLF-A) with a TVM procedure (Uphold™ LITE support-system) for the treatment of the advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse.Study design.Single-center retrospective study. Women with symptomatic anterior prolapse ≥ III stage according to the POP-quantification (POP-Q) system and submitted to the VPP associated with the SSLF-A or to the Uphold™ procedure were included. Primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications. Pearson chi-square test and exact Fisher test were adopted for categorical variables, while intergroup Mann-Whitney U test and intragroup Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for continuous variables; the statistical analysis was conducted at 95 % confidence level. ResultsFifty-five women in VPP-group and 118 women in Uphold-group were included. At 6-month follow-up, objective anterior relapse in VPP-group (3/55, 5.4 %) was like Uphold-group (5/118, 4.2 %; p = 0.71), as well as objective apical relapse (0/55, 0 % vs 3/118, 2.5 %; p = 0.55); no significant difference emerged in bulge symptoms (1/55, 1.8 % vs 5/118, 4.2 %; p = 0.67). At 12-month follow-up women were telephonically investigated; no significant difference emerged in bulge symptoms (1/55, 1.8 % vs 6/118, 5.1 %; p = 0.43). Reoperation rate for the composite outcome POP relapse, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and remotion of the TVM resulted lower in the VPP group (1/55, 1.8 % vs 13/118, 11 %; p = 0.03). Post-operative buttock pain (32/55, 58.2 % vs 24/118, 20.3 %; p < 0.0001) and post-operative urinary retention (16/55, 29.1 % vs 6/118, 5.1 %; p < 0.0001) were higher in VPP-group, with a complete resolution between 2 and 3 weeks after treatment. ConclusionVPP associated with SSLF-A was as effective as Uphold™ LITE support-system for both anterior and central compartment prolapse treatment at 6- and 12-month follow-up. VPP-group presented a lower reoperation rate for the composite outcome prolapse relapse repair, SUI, and removal of the mesh.

Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial.

To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in stages III and IV by sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) by comparing anatomical and subjective cure rates and quality-of-life parameters (through the version validated for the Portuguese language of the Prolapse Quality of Life [P-QoL] questionnaire) under two definitions: genital prolapse Ba, Bp, and C < -1 (stage I) and Ba, Bp, and C ≤ 0 (stage II). After we obtained approval from the Ethics Committee (under CAAE 0833/06) and registered the study in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01347021), 51 patients were randomized into two groups: the USLS group (N = 26) and the SSLF group (N = 25), with follow-up 6 and 12 months after the procedures. There was a significant improvement in the P-QoL score and anatomical measurements of all compartments in both groups after 12 months (p < 0.001). The anatomical cure rates in the USLS and SSLF groups, considering stage 1, were of 34.6% and 40% (anterior) respectively; of 100% both for groups (apical); and of 73.1% and 92% (posterior) respectively. The rates of adverse outcomes were of 42% (N = 11) and 36% (N = 11) for the USLS and SSLF groups respectively (p = 0.654), and those outcomes were excessive bleeding, bladder perforation (intraoperative) or gluteal pain, and urinary infection (postoperative), among others, without differences between the groups. High cure rates in all compartments were observed according to the anatomical criterion (stage I), without differences in P-QoL scores and complications either with USLS or SSLF for the surgical treatment of accentuated POP.

Modified Vaginal Mesh Procedure with DynaMesh®-PR4 for the Treatment of Anterior/Apical Vaginal Prolapse.

(1) Background: Treating female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is challenging. Surgical meshes have been used in transvaginal surgeries since the 1990s, but complications such as mesh exposure and infection have been reported. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh, known for its stability and non-reactive properties, has shown promise in urogynecological surgeries. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients who underwent a modified PVDF vaginal mesh repair procedure using DynaMesh®-PR4 and combined trans-obturator and sacrospinous fixation techniques. Additional surgeries were performed as needed. (3) Results: The mean operation time was 56.7 min, and the mean blood loss was 66.7 mL. The average hospitalization period was 4.2 days with Foley catheter removal after 2 days. Patients experienced lower pain scores from the day of the operation to the following day. Postoperative follow-up revealed that 85.2% of patients achieved anatomic success, with 14.8% experiencing recurrent stage II cystocele. No recurrence of apical prolapse was observed. Complications were rare, with one case (3.7%) of asymptomatic mesh protrusion. (4) Conclusions: The modified vaginal mesh procedure using DynaMesh®-PR4 showed favorable outcomes with a short operation time, low recurrence rate, rare complications, and improved functional outcomes. This surgical option could be considered for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Место влагалищной сакроспинальной фиксации в хирургическом лечении пролапса гениталий

Место влагалищной сакроспинальной фиксации в хирургическом лечении пролапса гениталий