Sac Enlargement Research Articles

Effectiveness of Intra-operative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Assessment to Optimize Type II Endoleak Embolization.

To analyze the effectiveness of type II endoleaks (T2E) embolization using intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Consecutive patients treated for T2E underwent a standardized protocol with trans-arterial or trans-lumbar access, large volume embolization, onlay fusion, and intra-operative CEUS. Technical success was defined by exclusion of endoleak by CEUS. Twenty-six patients (mean age 81 ± 11years old; 89% male) were treated. The mean aneurysm sac enlargement was 11 ± 8mm from T2E diagnosis. Embolization was performed using Onyx® 18 in all patients with adjunctive coils in 13 patients (50%). After the first embolization, CEUS documented residual T2E in 13 patients (50%). Ten patients (38%) had additional embolization, which successfully eradicated the T2E in seven of them. Technical success was 50% after the first embolization attempt and 77% after additional attempts guided by CEUS (P = 0.080). There was no mortality. Median imaging follow-up was 22months. Among the 20 patients with no residual T2E on completion CEUS, 16 (80%) had sac stabilization and none required additional interventions for T2E. Of the six patients with residual T2Es on CEUS, three had sac stabilization (50%) and one required additional reintervention for T2E. There was one late aortic rupture at 56months. One in two patients treated by T2E embolization had residual endoleak on intra-operative CEUS after a first embolization attempt, decreasing to one in four patients after multiple attempts. A negative completion CEUS following embolization was associated with higher rates of sac stabilization and no need for additional T2E embolization.

A Greek Multicentre Study Assessing the Outcome of Late Rupture After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. A multi-institutional Greek study of late ruptures after EVAR between 2008 - 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were intra-operative and in hospital death. A total of 70 patients presented with late rupture after EVAR (proportion of ruptured EVARs among all EVARs, 0.6%; 69 males; mean age 77.2 ± 6.7 years). The mean time interval between EVAR and late rupture was 72.3 months (range 6 - 180 months). In all cases the cause of rupture was the presence of an endoleak (type I, 73%) with sac enlargement. Moreover, 34% of subjects with rupture after EVAR had been lost to follow up and 32% underwent a secondary intervention. Additionally, 57 patients (81%) were treated by conversion to open surgical repair (COSR) and the remainder by endovascular correction of endoleak (ECE). Eleven intra-operative deaths (16%) were recorded. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 41% (23% ECE vs. 46% COSR; p= .21). Of the patients who presented as initially haemodynamically stable, 23% died during hospitalisation, while the respective mortality rate for patients who presented as unstable was 78% (odds ratio [OR] 11.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 - 39.1; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that severity of haemodynamic shock was the most significant risk factor for intra-operative (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.58 - 32.40; p= .010) and in hospital death (OR 9.53, 95% CI 2.79 - 32.58; p < .001). These data underline the devastating prognosis of late rupture after EVAR. Haemodynamic status at presentation was an important predictive factor for death both in the ECE and COSR groups. Rigorous follow up and prompt evaluation of an unstable patient in case of rupture after EVAR is recommended.

Impact of the Lumbar Arteries on Aneurysm Diameter and Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Prophylactic embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is recommended to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). However, the impact of patent lumbar arteries (LAs) on T2ELs and aneurysm diameter has not been elucidated. Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at our institution between January 2013 and September 2022 and whose IMA had been occluded preoperatively or newly occluded postoperatively were included in the study. Predictive factors for aneurysm sac enlargement, sac shrinkage, and T2EL were investigated. T2ELs occurred in 22.8% of the patients. The 4-year cumulative incidence rates of sac enlargement and shrinkage were 6.7% and 64.6%, respectively. The number of postoperative patent LAs was identified as a risk factor for T2ELs (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-12.7, P=0.0065). The number of postoperative patent LAs was found to be a significant predictor of sac enlargement (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 3.15, 95% CI: 1.43-6.96, P=0.0045) and shrinkage (AHR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91, P=0.014). The current study demonstrated that the number of postoperative patent LAs had a significant impact on the development of T2ELs and the change in aneurysm diameter in patients in whom the IMA was occluded after EVAR.

Distribution of osteoprotegerin in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in humans: association with aneurysm wall protective remodeling.

Aneurysm wall inflammation is associated with lesion instability in unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). However, most UIAs remain unruptured during lifelong follow-ups because of simultaneous protective remodeling against the inflammatory response. The protective effects of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms have been suggested using rodent models; however, the role of this protein in UIAs in humans remains unclear. Herein, the authors examined the relationship between OPG expression and aneurysm wall integrity in intraoperatively resected UIAs by using immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining. Sixteen UIA wall tissue specimens resected between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed. Aneurysm growth was defined as an enlargement > 1 mm or an obvious morphological change over the course of more than 6 months. Three high-power fields were randomly selected from areas expressing high and low levels of OPG within the same aneurysm. To clarify the role of OPG in the human aneurysm wall, the authors compared averaged values for the following pathological features between the 2 OPG expression groups: aneurysm wall thickness, collagen, macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). Immunohistochemical staining within the entire tissue area was also analyzed to determine the relationships between OPG expression and different aneurysm growth patterns. Pathological findings were compared between high and low OPG expression levels using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The heterogeneous expression of OPG was detected in the walls of UIAs. Lesions expressing high OPG levels had thicker aneurysm walls (327 vs 180 μm, p = 0.002) and higher expression levels of TGF-β1 (8.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.002) than those expressing low OPG levels. The expression of TGF-β1 was colocalized with that of OPG mainly in the tunica media. Furthermore, lesions expressing high OPG levels had larger α-SMA+ areas (25% vs 13%, p = 0.002). Aneurysm growth was observed in 6 of 9 UIAs with available data: whole sac expansion in 4 and secondary aneurysm formation in 2. Among the 6 UIAs with aneurysm growth, OPG expression was relatively higher in the UIAs with an internal elastic lamina than in those without (17% vs 6.9%). Aneurysm wall integrity was associated with OPG expression in the aneurysm wall. Collectively, the study results indicated that OPG is associated with protective remodeling, which may contribute to the retention of aneurysm wall structures.

Three-Year Safety and Efficacy of the INCRAFT Endograft for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Results of the INSIGHT Study.

Preliminary results of the INSIGHT study showed that the low-profile INCRAFT Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Stent-Graft System was safe and effective in the endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to assess the durability and the midterm effectiveness of EVAR using the INCRAFT System in the framework of a multicenter, prospective, open-label, post-approval study. Between 2015 and 2016, 150 subjects from 23 European centers treated with the INCRAFT System for an infrarenal AAA were included. Clinical and radiologic data were prospectively collected and analyzed using protocol-specified, monitored follow-up clinic visits at 1, 6, and 12 months post-implantation and annually after that. The clinical success at 3 years was determined. Freedom from overall and aneurysm-related mortality, type I endoleak, secondary interventions, and aneurysm sac enlargement through 3 years were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for late outcomes. An independent clinical events committee reviewed all events. The CT (computed tomography) scans through 1 year were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. The primary clinical success rate at 3 years was 84.0% (126/150). There were no aneurysm-related deaths, endograft migration, or aneurysm-related ruptures through 3 years. Stent fracture was detected in 2 subjects (1.3%) without clinical sequelae. Over 3 years, freedom from overall mortality was 89.4%, freedom from secondary interventions was 80%, and freedom from aneurysm sac enlargement was 96.5%. The 3-year freedom from type IA and IB endoleaks was 93.3% and 98.6%, respectively. In a multicenter real-world study setting, the use of a low-profile INCRAFT device for AAA is associated with sustained clinical success and low rates of reinterventions through 3 years. Low-profile endografts have broadened the spectrum of patients with anatomic suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). However, questions remain regarding the durability of the repair. The INSIGHT study evaluated the use of the INCRAFT System in routine real-world clinical practice, including patients with complex anatomies. The treatment was safe and effective. The results showed sustained clinical success over 3 years, with no aneurysm-related deaths or ruptures, and a high rate of intervention-free survival at 3 years. Despite the low-profile design of the endograft, the midterm results demonstrate the durability of AAA repair using the INCRAFT System.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477111.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Anticoagulation on Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Our objective was to investigate whether patients who receive anticoagulation therapy have different outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from those who do not. We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared outcomes of EVAR in patients who were on therapeutic anticoagulation vs those who were not. We developed and reported the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines with a registered protocol (CRD42022375894). The Ovid interface was used to search Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to November 2022. The quality of studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (maximum score=9), and the evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was the effect estimate in time-to-event meta-analyses, calculated using the inverse-variance statistical method and random-effects models. Sixteen studies qualified for inclusion reporting a total of 35 739 individuals. Anticoagulated patients had a statistically significantly higher hazard of death (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.03-3.63), endoleak (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.55-2.93), reintervention (HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.27-2.52), and aneurysm sac expansion (HR=2.72, 95% CI=1.57-4.72) than patients not receiving anticoagulation therapy. The median score on the NOS was 7 (range=4-9). The certainty of evidence was very low for mortality and reintervention and low for endoleak and sac expansion. Anticoagulation is a poor prognostic factor after standard EVAR and should be considered in decision-making, consent processes, and surveillance strategies. The number of individuals who take anticoagulation treatment has been rapidly increasing over the recent years. We aimed to investigate the effect of such treatment on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Anticoagulated patients were found to have increased mortality, endoleak, and reintervention rates after EVAR compared to their non-anticoagulated counterparts. Anticoagulation therapy has a prognostic role in EVAR and should be considered in decision making and EVAR surveillance. Anticoagulated patients need to be informed of the higher failure rates of EVAR, and intensified surveillance strategies may need to be implemented in this patient cohort.

Time Dependent Correlation Between Sac Behaviour and Re-intervention after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and time to re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent EVAR at a single centre between January 2008 and November 2011 and who were followed up for a mean of 6.6 ± 2.9 years was conducted. Based on sac appearances on pre-operative imaging and imaging at the end of follow up, patients were stratified into two groups: (1) sac regression; and (2) no sac regression. The no sac regression group was further subdivided into stable sac group and sac expansion group. Sac regression and expansion throughout follow up were defined as a decrease or increase in the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter of ≥ 5 mm compared with the pre-operative size. A Cox proportional hazards model using multiple failure per subject data was used to identify sac behaviour as a predictor of re-intervention free time. Patients with sac regression had a higher probability of freedom from re-intervention compared with those with a stable or expanding aneurysm sac (94%, 57%, and 16% at 12 years, respectively; log rank, p<.001). Mean time to re-intervention was 11.3 years for the sac regression group, 8.8 years for the stable sac group, and 5.0 years for the sac expansion group (p < .001). In the stable sac group, the risk of re-intervention increased sharply six years after EVAR, whereas in the sac expansion group a sharp rise in re-intervention was noted 3.5 years after EVAR, reaching a plateau after year 6. A time dependent correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and re-intervention was found. Such findings have implications for surveillance strategies.

Long-term clinical outcomes of EVAR within IFU compared to outside IFU

Abstract Background Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been used worldwide to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Outcomes after EVAR between within instruction for use (IFU) and outside IFU are still controversial. We analyzed long term outcomes of EVAR within IFU compared to EVAR outside IFU and baseline clinical/anatomical characteristics that influence outcomes of EVAR. Methods We collected data from 766 patients (mean age 71.0 ± 12.5 years, male 90.2%) who underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAA between August 1997 and July 2021 at two centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was aneurysm related mortality (ARM) during follow up. The secondary outcomes were endoleak, reintervention and aneurysm sac enlargement. Results The mean AAA diameter is 59.0 ± 12.2 mm. The proportion of patients underwent EVAR outside IFU was 62.7% (n=466). Neck angle &amp;gt; 60 degree was the most common outside IFU criterion (n=210, 27.4%). The median clinical and imaging follow-up duration was 36.5 and 51.0 months, respectively. Total 110 patients (14.8%) had complications during follow up. The outside IFU group had more complications compare to the within IFU group (p=0.033). Overall mortality rate was 8.8% (n=60). ARM occurred in 0% of patients with EVAR within IFU and in 7 (1.5%) of patients with EVAR outside IFU (p=0.041), respectively. There was no significant difference in incidence of endoleak (28.5 vs. 23.1%, p=0.173), reintervention rate (8.4 vs. 9.3%, p=0.688) and aneurysm sac enlargement (23.6 vs. 23.4%, p=0.957) between patients underwent EVAR within IFU and outside IFU group. In multivariate analysis, proximal neck diameter &amp;gt; 28 mm was independent risk factor for ARM (HR, 9.132; 95% CI, 1.684 – 49.516, P=0.010). In addition, proximal neck angle &amp;gt; 60 degree was independent risk factor for endoleak (HR, 1.553; 95% CI, 1.042 – 2.314, P=0.031) and reintervention (HR, 2.297; 95% CI, 1.333 – 3.955, P=0.003). Neck length &amp;lt; 10 mm and neck diameter &amp;gt;28 mm were risk factors for aneurysm sac enlargement (HR, 4.363; 95% CI, 1.252 – 15.211, P=0.021 and HR, 3.148; 95% CI, 1.261 – 7.859, P=0.014). Age over 75 was also a risk factor for endoleak (HR, 2.491; 95% CI, 1.666 – 3.726, P=0.000) and aneurysm sac enlargement (HR, 3.150; 95% CI, 1.536 – 6.458, P=0.002). Conclusions Our study showed EVAR outside IFU is associated higher ARM compared to EVAR within IFU. In addition, neck angulation was risk factor for endoleak and reintervention. Clinicians should be caution when they perform EVAR outside IFU and select optimal patient for successful EVAR.

Two-Stage Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Preemptive Embolization: A Retrospective Study

ObjectiveType II endoleak is the most common complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. Retrograde perfusion from the aneurysmal sac side branch to the aneurysmal sac, including the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries, is associated with adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair, such as aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, rupture, and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related death. Preemptive embolization of the aneurysmal sac side branch before endovascular aneurysm repair is an effective and safe procedure for preventing type II endoleak and reducing the size of the aneurysmal sac. Since 2019, we have been conducting preemptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries. Thus, we intended to work on a two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair in which embolization and endovascular aneurysm repair are performed on separate days, owing to concerns about prolonged operative time and increased contrast media use and radiation exposure from performing endovascular aneurysm repair simultaneously. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a two-stage endovascular aneurysm repair. MethodsThis retrospective study included 114 cases of endovascular aneurysm repair (95 men and 19 women) for AAA performed at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery embolization were performed simultaneously with endovascular aneurysm repair (simultaneous group) in 49 cases, and two-stage embolization was performed (two-stage group) in 30 cases. The primary endpoints included the occurrence of T2EL during follow-up and the embolization rate of the IMA or LAs. ResultsType II endoleak did not occur in the two-stage group(follow-up period;35±6.2 months), whereas it was observed in 8.2% of patients more than 6 months after EVAR in the simultaneous group(follow-up period;28±5.5months). While the total operative time was 340 ± 111.2 min in the simultaneous group, the durations for embolization and endovascular aneurysm repair in the two-stage group were 169 ± 35.5 min and 135.0 ± 26.4 min (total time 304 ± 31.2 min, p=0.21), respectively, indicating a reduction in the total time required for the two techniques. The total amounts of contrast media used in the simultaneous and two-stage groups were 200.0 ± 179.2 mL and 182.0 ± 51.2 mL(p=0.42), respectively, and the corresponding total radiation doses were 2502.4 ± 690.5 mGy and 2114.6 ± 351.2 mGy (p=0.28), respectively, showing a decrease in both in the two-stage group. The lumbar artery embolization rates were 74.3% and 87.9% (p<0.01) in the simultaneous and two-stage groups, respectively, indicating a significant difference. ConclusionsTwo-stage endovascular aneurysm repair with preemptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries may be an effective strategy for reducing type II endoleak occurrence, overall operative time, contrast use, and overall radiation exposure.

Abstract 14516: Combined Platelet Morphology and Clinicoradiological Features to Predict Type II Endoleaks Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

Introduction: Persistent endoleak and associated endotension following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) can compromise successful repair and lead to continued sac expansion and eventual life-threatening rupture event. Hypothesis: A risk-stratification algorithm of the inherent anatomical and systemic cellular characteristics of patients might predict the incidence of type II endoleaks on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing EVAR or fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) procedures. Methods: Single-center retrospective study includes 146 AAA patients undergoing primary elective EVAR and FEVAR procedures between September 2013 and July 2021. A review of institutional medical records was conducted for the analysis. Patients who or who did not developed a type II endoleaks were included in this study. Results: Mean platelet volume (MPV) was significantly increased in patients with type II endoleaks and was associated with lower endoleak-free survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that MPV demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance in distinguishing patients who developed type II endoleaks, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.64. A risk-stratification panel consisting of postoperative MPV, history of type II diabetes, and number of preoperative patent lumbar arteries achieved an AUC value of 0.72 and predicted endoleak-free survival rate with HR of 4.88. We built an easy-to-use nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative type II endoleak and revealed that MPV had the highest scoring weight of any variable in our model. Conclusions: We refined the anatomical and systemic traits in the blood that identified MPV as a significant predictor for type II endoleaks, which might facilitate post-surgical monitoring using complete blood count (CBC) as a supplement to imaging practice.

Prevalence of aortic aneurysmal sac expansion using CTA in type II endoleak: comparison between endoleak visualization in CTA phase and in delayed phase

BackgroundTo compare the prevalence of aneurysmal sac expansion in type II endoleak (T2E) presenting on CTA phase with T2E presenting on delayed phase.MethodsA retrospective study at a single tertiary care center in Bangkok, Thailand. Serial measurement of aneurysmal sac diameters was obtained and the prevalence of aneurysmal sac expansion was compared.Results130 patients were enrolled from January 2005 to December 2019. The prevalence of aneurysmal sac expansion in T2E patients presenting in the CTA phase and delayed phase in this 2-year observational study were 16% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.065). Age > 80 years (25.8% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.028) and initial aneurysmal sac diameter (71.3 mm vs. 57.7 mm; P = 0.035) were associated with the aneurysmal sac expansion. Aneurysmal sac expansion occurred in 18.3% of patients with patent IMA and 6% of patients with occluded IMA (P = 0.053). The number and diameter of lumbar artery feeder, and the presence of intrastent thrombus were not associated with aneurysmal sac expansion. T2E presenting on CTA phase resolved in 9.2% of cases compared with 7.14% of delayed phase cases (P = 1.0).ConclusionsThe prevalence of aneurysmal sac expansion in T2E patients presenting on CTA phase was not statistically significantly higher than in patients on delayed phase. Age more than 80 years and initial aneurysmal sac diameter were significantly associated with aneurysmal sac expansion.

Open Conversion for Failed Endovascular Repair with Sac Expansion: An Updated Mini-Series 2018-2022

Open Conversion for Failed Endovascular Repair with Sac Expansion: An Updated Mini-Series 2018-2022

One-year aneurysm-sac dynamics are associated with reinterventions and rupture following infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectiveOne-year aneurysm sac changes have previously been found to be associated with mortality and may have the potential to guide personalized follow-up following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). In this study, we examined the association of these early sac changes with long-term reintervention and rupture. MethodsWe identified all patients undergoing first-time EVAR for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2003 and 2018 in the Vascular Quality Initiative with linkage to Medicare claims for long-term outcomes. We included patients with an imaging study at 1 year postoperatively. Aneurysm sac behavior was defined as per the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines: stable sac (<5 mm change), sac regression (≥5 mm), and sac expansion (≥5 mm). Outcomes included mortality, reintervention, and rupture within 8 years, which were assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Secondarily, we utilized polynomial spline interpolation to demonstrate the continuous relationship of diameter change to 8-year hazard of reintervention, rupture, or mortality as a composite outcome. ResultsOf 31,185 EVAR patients, 16,102 (52%) had an imaging study at 1 year and were included in this study. At 1 year, 44% of sacs remained stable, 49% regressed, and 6.2% displayed expansion. Following risk adjustment, compared with a stable sac at 1 year, sac regression was associated with lower 8-year mortality (49% vs 53%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99; P = .036), reintervention rate (8.9% vs 15%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68; P < .001), and rupture rate (2.0% vs 4.0%; HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.29-0.69; P < .001). Conversely, compared with a stable sac, sac expansion was associated with higher 8-year mortality (64% vs 53%; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.51; P < .001) and reintervention rate (27% vs 15%; HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.57-2.51; P < .001), but similar risk of rupture (7.2% vs 4.0%; HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.88-2.96; P = .12). Polynomial spline interpolation demonstrated that, compared with no diameter change at 1 year, increased sac regression was associated with an incrementally lower risk of late outcomes, whereas increased sac expansion was associated with an incrementally higher risk of late outcomes. ConclusionsFollowing EVAR, compared with a stable sac at 1-year imaging, sac regression and expansion are associated with a lower and higher risk respectively of long-term mortality, reinterventions, and ruptures. Moreover, the amount of regression or expansion seems to be incrementally associated with these late outcomes, too. Future studies are needed to determine how to improve 1-year sac regression, and whether it is safe to extend follow-up intervals for patients with regressing sacs.

Initial two-day blood pressure management after endovascular aneurysm repair improves midterm outcomes by reducing the incidence of early type II endoleak

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate midterm outcomes of our novel strategy of postoperative initial 2-day blood pressure management (BPM) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for the prevention of subsequent type II endoleak (T2EL) in a single-center series. MethodsBetween 2008 and 2014, 137 patients who underwent EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were reviewed. Starting from 2013, the mean blood pressure was maintained between 75 and 90 mmHg for the initial 24 hours after EVAR followed by systolic pressure controlled below 120 mmHg during the next 24 hours in the treatment group (n = 76). The incidence of T2EL detected at 7 days, reintervention, and AAA sac diameter up to 5 years after EVAR were compared with those of the control group comprising of 60 consecutive patients who underwent standard EVAR without BPM prior to 2013. ResultsBetween the treatment group and the control group, significant differences were achieved in the incidence of T2EL at 7 days (19.7% vs 40.0%; P = .009), a mean decrease of AAA sac diameter at 1-year (−5.1 ± 4.9 vs −2.2 ± 6.7 mm; P = .013) and 2-year (−5.4 ± 7.7 vs −1.7 ± 10.8 mm; P = .045). In addition, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of T2EL detected at 7 days with the use of the Gore Excluder with 22.7% in the treatment group vs 80.0% in the control group (P < .001), which resulted in a significant decrease in the aneurysm sac diameter up to 4 years after EVAR. Survival rate without AAA sac enlargement at 5 years after EVAR (83.0% vs 70.0%; P = .021) in the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group, whereas no significant differences were observed in the freedom rates of reintervention, T2EL-related reintervention, and all-cause mortality between the groups. ConclusionsPostoperative initial 2-day BPM had a preventive effect on AAA sac enlargement until midterm periods, by reducing the incidence of T2EL at 7 days after EVAR. The usage of Gore Excluder under BPM was especially associated with sustained positive effects until the midterm follow-up.

Mid-Term Outcomes of a Pre-Cannulated Iliac Branched Device in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortoiliac Aneurysms: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center.

The aim was to assess the mid-term results of the E-iliac branched device. Baseline and follow-up data of this monocentric retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with aortoiliac aneurysms treated with iliac branched devices between 2016 and 2023 were extracted from the hospital records. Preoperative and follow-up CT scans were analyzed regarding endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac remodeling, and device patency. Overall, 50 devices were implanted in 38 patients with a median age of 69 (IQR 62-78) years, and 1.6 bridging stent grafts per vessel were implanted through transfemoral (22/50; 44%) or upper extremity access (28/50; 56%). Primary technical success and assisted technical success were 97% (37/38) and 100% (38/38), respectively. No migration, no type I or III endoleaks, no stroke, colonic ischemia, aneurysm rupture, or conversion during the early and mid-term follow-ups (11 months, IQR 5-26) were observed. Aneurysm sac enlargement or shrinkage was observed in 0% (0/38) and 16% (6/38) patients, respectively. E-iliac-related re-interventions were seen only during the early follow-up: two thrombectomies with bare-metal stent relining after thrombosis of the iliac limb. Bridging stent graft and E-iliac patency during the mid-term follow-up were 100%. E-iliac showed encouraging mid-term results in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with high technical success and a low re-intervention rate.

Late Open Semi-conversion with Endograft Preservation for (Type II) Endoleaks with Late Aneurysm Sac Enlargement after EVAR - Indications, Method and Results in Our Own Patient Collective

EVAR (endovascular aortic repair) is the most common method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, but according to the latest findings it carries the risk of subsequent complications. These can be caused by (late) aneurysm sac growth. If conservative and surgical therapies fail to treat the aneurysm sac growth, open conversion is necessary to prevent aneurysm rupture. There are several options for open conversion, in which the EVAR prosthesis can be completely preserved or is (partially) removed. Late open semi-conversion with complete in-situ preservation of the EVAR-prosthesis and gathering of the aneurysm sac are a less invasive method than complete conversion and may be performed instead for selected patients. The aim of the present work is to present the surgical method, including indications and technical information, as well as the presentation of the results in our recent patient collective.All patients semi-converted in our department of vascular surgery and phlebology due to (type II) endoleak were included. All data are presented as n (%) or median (range).Between 6/2019 and 3/2023, 13 patients underwent semi-conversion 6 (2-12) years (median, range) after the initial EVAR. The aneurysm sac diameter at the time of semi-conversion was 69mm (58-95mm), the operating time was 114min (97-147min), the blood loss was 100ml (100-1500ml). Five (38%) patients received blood transfusion intraoperatively and 2 (15%) postoperatively. The stay in the intensive care unit lasted 1 (1-5) days, the hospitalisation time was 8 (6-11) days. Postoperative complications were intestinal atony (3 [23%], 1 [8%] with nausea/emesis and gastric tube insertion), anaemia (2 [15%]), hyponatraemia (2 [15%]), delirium (1 [8%]), COVID-19 infection (1 [8%]) and 1 [8%] intra-abdominal postoperative bleeding with the indication for surgical revision and the transfusion of 8 erythrocyte concentrates.Semi-conversion is a safe and practicable surgical method with few severe complications for a selected group of patients, which should be considered as an alternative to more invasive methods with (partial) removal of the EVAR-prosthesis. Further long-term studies comparing semi-conversion to full conversion are needed to demonstrate its benefits.

Mortality and risk factors for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after repair endovascular (rARE).

The aim of this study was to characterize risk factors for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair (rARE) and evaluate 30-day mortality in comparison to primary ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). A retrospective review of all adult patients with rAAA at a single tertiary university care center between February 11, 2006, and December 31, 2018, was performed. A total of 267 patients with rAAA were identified, 11 of whom had rARE. Descriptive statistics were applied due to the small sample size. Overall 30-day mortality was similar between primary rAAA and rARE (31.5% vs 27.3%); however, patients with rARE were more likely to receive palliative care (3.9% vs 18.2%). Mortality of patients who underwent operative intervention was 11.1% for rARE and 28.7% for primary rAAA at 30days. All patients had an endoleak at the time of rupture. Type 1 and type 3 endoleaks resulting in direct aortic sac pressurization were the primary cause of rARE (9 of 11 patients); however, rupture occurred in two patients with only a type 2 endoleak. There was no sac expansion at the time of rupture in four of 11 patients with rARE. Four of 11 patients were lost to follow-up prior to rARE. rARE is an uncommon complication following EVAR and contributes to late aneurysm-related mortality following endovascular repair. Although the 30-day mortality rate was similar for rARE and primary rAAA, larger series are required to determine which patients with rARE will benefit from intervention. The presence of endoleak and sac expansion may alert surgeons to increased risk of rARE; however, a subset of patients with rARE did not have sac expansion or surveillance imaging on follow-up. Loss to lifelong imaging surveillance remains a risk factor for rARE.

The Impact of Proximal Neck Anatomy on the 5-Year Outcomes Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair With the Ovation Stent Graft.

Hostile proximal neck anatomy has historically been associated with worse outcomes for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We investigated the impact of proximal neck anatomy on the outcomes following EVAR with the Ovation abdominal stent graft (Endologix, Irving, Calif). We used prospectively collected data from the Effectiveness of Custom Seal with Ovation: Review of the Evidence database, compromised of pooled data from 6 clinical trials and the European Post-Market Registry of patients undergoing elective infrarenal EVAR (2009-2017). We investigated the impact of short neck length (<10 mm), wide neck diameter (≥28 mm), reverse taper shape (>10%), and neck angulation (>45°) on the outcomes. The primary outcome was type IA endoleak. Secondary outcomes included any type I/III endoleak, sac expansion, aneurysm-related reinterventions, and all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, and a combined endpoint of type IA endoleak, graft migration, AAA-related reintervention, conversion, and aneurysm rupture. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the 30 day and 5 year rates and assess univariate and risk-adjusted differences. Of the 1020 patients, 60 patients had a short neck, 113 had a wide neck diameter, 279 were reverse taper shaped, and 99 had neck angulation >45°. Wide proximal neck was associated with higher 5 year type IA endoleak estimates compared with favorable neck anatomy (7.1% vs 4.3%; p=0.02). No association with 5 year type IA endoleak was found for short neck length (1.7% vs 4.3%; p=0.52), reverse taper shape (3.2% vs 4.3%; p=0.99), or neck angulation (6.1% vs 4.3%; p=0.13). A wide neck diameter compared with favorable anatomy was also associated with higher 5 year estimates of graft migration (3.8% vs 0.4%; p=0.03) and the combined neck-related adverse outcome endpoint (16% vs 9.5%; p=0.002). The estimates of aneurysm sac expansion, rupture, and overall and aneurysm-related mortality were similar between the hostile proximal neck anatomy cohorts and favorable anatomy. Wide proximal neck is associated with higher 5 year type IA endoleak rates for patients treated with the Ovation stent graft. However, short neck length, reverse taper shape, and neck angulation are not associated with higher 5 year type IA endoleak rates. Hostile proximal neck anatomy has historically been associated with worse outcomes for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The Ovation stent graft platform uses a different proximal sealing method using a polymer inflatable ring, aiming to improve sealing between the graft and aortic wall. This study demonstrated that short, angulated, and reverse taper-shaped neck anatomy did not result in increased type IA endoleak estimates in patients treated with the Ovation stent graft platform. Potentially, the different sealing mechanisms played a role in mitigating the historically worse outcomes in patients with short, angulated, and reverse taper-shaped neck anatomy.

757 Indocyanine Green Colonic Perfusion Demonstration Following Robotic Da Vinci X Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Type II Endoleak

Abstract Background We describe the technical operative details of the robotic repair of a type II endoleak (T2E) following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We demonstrate that indocyanine green (ICG) can be used intra-operatively to demonstrate perfusion of the colon following ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) vessel feeding the aneurysm sac. Method A 74-year old male underwent EVAR for a 5.8 cm infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm using an E-Tegra, Jotec Device (JOTEC Gmb, Lotzenäcker 23,D-72379 Hechingen). Surveillance contrast CT (CTA) over the ensuing 30 months confirmed progressive sac expansion. Results ICG confirmed colonic perfusion via the marginals after IMA ligation. Total operative time 56 min &amp;lt; 50 mls blood loss and 1-day hospital stay. 3-month follow-up: CTA and ultrasound demonstrated complete resolution of T2E and adequately perfused colon. Conclusions A total robotic approach can be performed safely with intra-operative ICG used to demonstrate colonic perfusion as an added safety measure.

Open Conversion with Explantation of Stent Grafts After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is widely used worldwide, the fact that it is associated with increased rates of reintervention has been considered a problem. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of primary open AAA repair and open conversion with explantation of stent grafts after EVAR. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 1,120 patients (open repair, n=664; EVAR, n=456) who underwent AAA repair at Kobe University from 1999 to 2019. Of the 664 patients who underwent open repair, 121 (patients who underwent primary open repair (POR) as a concomitant procedure and patients with ruptured AAA) were excluded from the study. The outcomes of POR were compared with those of open conversion with explantation of stent grafts. Of the 543 patients who underwent open repair, 513 underwent POR and 30 underwent open conversion with explantation of stent grafts. The operation time for POR was significantly less than that for open conversion with explantation. During surgery, patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required significantly more transfusions of red cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate than those who underwent POR. Overall, 30 patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required a total of 48 reinterventions before surgery. Hospital mortality rates were 0.7% and 0% in the POR and open conversion with explantation groups, respectively (P=0.62). Although overall survival at 5years in the POR group was significantly better than that in the open conversion with explantation group (89.3±1.7% vs. 79.5±9.6%; P=0.01), there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the freedom from aortic event (hospital death, reintervention, and aortic death). According to the multivariate analysis, open conversion with explantation was not an independent risk factor for late death. There were 20 patients who were hesitant to undergo OCE, although we recommended OCE. In a subgroup analysis, the overall mean cost borne by patients who underwent EVAR was approximately 2.3 times higher compared with that borne by patients who underwent POR. Although demanding, both early and long-term outcomes of OCE have been favorable in our present study. OCE is highly recommended in patients with persistent sac enlargement after EVAR.