SABA Use Research Articles

The Impact of Eliminating Out-of-Pocket Payments on Asthma Medication Use.

High costs of controller therapies may be a barrier to guideline-recommended asthma treatment. We determined whether eliminating out-of-pocket (OOP) payments among low-income patients with asthma impacted controller medication use. We applied a controlled interrupted time series design to administrative claims data in British Columbia, Canada from 2017-2020. Cases were individuals with an annual household income <$13,750 in whom copays were eliminated on January 2019; there was no change in public coverage for the control group with annual income >$45,000. We evaluated trends in asthma medication costs, use, the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing medications to all asthma medications, excessive use of short-acting β-agonists (SABA) (>1 canister/month), and the proportion of days (PDC) covered by controller therapies. There were 12,940 cases (62% female, mean age 30.3 years, SD 14.9), and 71,331 controls (55% female, mean age of 31.3 years, SD 16.3). Removal of OOP payments increased monthly mean medication costs by $3.32 (95% CI $0.08 - $6.56, 2020 Canadian dollars), days supply of controller medications by 1.50 days (95% CI 0.61 - 2.40), and the ratio of ICS-containing medications to total medications by 4.20% (95% CI 0.73% - 7.66%) compared to the control group. The policy had no effect on PDC by controller therapies (0.01, 95% CI -0.01 - 0.04), but non-significantly decreased the percentage of patients with excessive SABA use (-6.37%; 95% CI -12.90% - 0.16%). Removal of OOP payments increased the dispensation of controller therapies, suggesting cost-related non-adherence could impair optimal asthma management.

SABA prescriptions and asthma management practices in Singapore: results from a cross-sectional, observational SABINA III study

ObjectivesTo evaluate asthma characteristics and treatment patterns, including short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions, in primary and specialist care in the Singapore cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA III) study.DesignCross-sectional,...

SABINA + Hong Kong: a territory wide study of prescribing trends and outcomes associated with the use of short-acting β2 agonists in the Chinese population

BackgroundExcessive use of short-acting β2 agonists (SABA) in patients with asthma continues to be a notable concern due to its link to higher mortality rates. Global relevance of SABA overuse in asthma management cannot be understated, it poses significant health risk to patients with asthma and imposes burden on healthcare systems. This study, as part of global SABINA progamme, aimed to describe the prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes associated with SABA use in the Chinese population.MethodsRetrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymized electronic healthcare records of Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) from Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA). Patients newly diagnosed with asthma between 2011 and 2018 and aged ≥12 years were included, stratified by SABA use (≤2, 3–6, 7–10, or ≥11 canisters/year) during one-year baseline period since asthma diagnosis date. Patients were followed up from one-year post-index until earliest censoring of events: outcome occurrence and end of study period (31 December 2020). Cox proportional regression and negative binomial regression were used to estimate the mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions associated with SABA use respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose. Outcomes include all-cause, asthma-related, and respiratory-related mortality, frequency of hospital admissions for any cause, and frequency of hospital admissions due to asthma.Results17,782 patients with asthma (mean age 46.7 years, 40.8% male) were included and 59.1% of patients were overusing SABA (≥ 3 canisters per year). Each patient was prescribed a median of 5.61 SABA canisters/year. SABA overuse during baseline period was associated with higher all-cause mortality risk compared to patients with ≤2 canisters/year. Association was dose-dependent, highest risk in those used ≥11 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.79) and 3–6 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.50). Higher SABA prescription volume associated with increased frequency of hospital admissions with greatest risk observed in 7–10 canisters/year subgroup (adjusted rate ratio: 4.81, 95% CI: 3.66, 6.37).ConclusionsSABA overuse is prevalent and is associated with increased all-cause mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions among the patients with asthma in Hong Kong.

Asthma control in the United States: Relationships between short-acting β2-agonist and systemic corticosteroid use

BackgroundAsthma control assessment is based on impairment (current symptoms) and risk (exacerbation history). ObjectiveTo understand the extent of uncontrolled asthma, we assessed relationships between prescription fills for systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) as risk and impairment markers, respectively. MethodsAnnual SCS and SABA fills among US patients with asthma were evaluated by a retrospective analysis of the IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data. Patients' disease severity was assigned based on the Global Initiative for Asthma step-therapy level. Exacerbations were evaluated by SCS fills within 12 months of a first asthma prescription fill. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as 2 or more SCS and/or 3 or more SABA fills annually. Individual patient relationships between SCS and SABA fills were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. ResultsA total of 4,506,527 patients were included; 15.1% had 2 or more SCS fills, 29.1% had 3 or more SABA fills, and 37.4% fulfilled either or both criteria. If only SCS use was assessed, 21.4% of cases that were treated as mild to moderate and 27.6% that were treated as severe asthma would have been misclassified as controlled. If only SABA use was evaluated, 7.8% of cases treated as mild to moderate and 11.2% treated as severe asthma would have been misclassified. Overall, 80.9% of uncontrolled asthma occurred in patients treated for mild to moderate disease. Among patients with 2 or more SCS fills, the mean SABA fills were 2.9; the correlation between SCS and SABA fills per patient was significant but weak (r = 0.18; P < .001). ConclusionHigh symptom burden and SCS exposures are not limited to severe asthma but are also characteristic of patients treated for mild to moderate disease. Both impairment and risk assessments are required to understand the full extent of uncontrolled asthma across disease severities.

Characterization of Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbations in the CAPTAIN Study

BackgroundLimited data exist on the relative impact of moderate and severe exacerbations on asthma control and impairment. ObjectiveTo explore data from the CAPTAIN trial to evaluate the relationship between first moderate or severe exacerbation and changes in lung function, symptoms, physical activity limitation scores, and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) usage to determine the clinical relevance of moderate events. MethodsCAPTAIN was a Phase IIIA 24–52-week, multicenter, international, randomized controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with uncontrolled asthma on inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist. Outcomes reportedinclude: first post-randomization exacerbation event by severity (Weeks 1–52), frequency and duration of moderate and severe exacerbations and time course of changes over ±14-day peri-exacerbation period for lung function, symptoms, limitations, and SABA use. ResultsOf the intent-to-treat population (N=2436), 550 patients (23%) continued to 52 weeks. There were 529 moderate and 546 severe exacerbations. Lung function changes were similar, but symptom, physical activity limitation scores, and SABA use were higher, for severe versus moderate exacerbations. Lung function decline preceded increases in symptom, physical activity limitation scores, and SABA use, irrespective of exacerbation severity. Lung function variables, limitation scores, and SABA use returned to pre-exacerbation baseline after ∼8–12 days for both exacerbation severities. ConclusionWhile severe events were associated with greater impact on symptoms, physical activity limitations, and SABA use, onset and time to resolution were generally similar for moderate and severe events. Both exacerbation severities represent clinically important deteriorations comprising clinical and functional changes. NCT02924688.

Impact of Asthma Medications During Pregnancy on Asthma Exacerbation, Maternal, and Neonatal Outcomes

Asthma affects 5% to 13% of pregnant women, and many require daily pharmacotherapy to achieve asthma control; however, adherence to medication during pregnancy often decreases. To understand the association between the use of or adherence to asthma medication with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Using linked population-based administrative databases from Alberta, Canada (2012-2018), pregnant women with asthma were categorized based on asthma medication use 1 year before pregnancy: short-acting β-agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and ICS with long-acting β-agonists (ICS+LABA). Women on ICS+LABA were grouped by trajectory of adherence during pregnancy using group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between the use of or trajectories of adherence to asthma medication during pregnancy with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Overall, 13,509 of 238,751 (5.7%) pregnant women had asthma before pregnancy (SABA: 24.7%; ICS: 12.5%; ICS+LABA: 25.1%; none: 36.1%). The use of SABA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 2.64), ICS (aOR: 3.37, 95% CI: 2.10, 5.39), and ICS+LABA (aOR: 3.64, 95% CI: 2.57, 5.17) had greater odds of disease exacerbation than no asthma medication during pregnancy. ICS+LABA adherence groups during pregnancy included low (79.8%), moderate-to-decreasing (14.0%), and moderate-to-increasing (6.2%). The moderate-to-decreasing (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84) and moderate-to-increasing (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.83) adherence groups had greater odds of disease exacerbation than the low adherence group. ICS use during pregnancy decreased odds of preterm birth (aOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.97). Other group comparisons were not statistically significant. Our study shows the importance of continuing asthma maintenance medication during pregnancy to improve outcomes. Future research should study the postpartum and long-term outcomes with asthma medication during pregnancy.

Greenhouse gas emissions associated with suboptimal asthma care in the UK: the SABINA healthCARe-Based envirONmental cost of treatment (CARBON) study

BackgroundPoorly controlled asthma is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU). Therefore, to quantify the environmental impact of asthma care, this retrospective, cohort, healthCARe-Based envirONmental cost of treatment...

The Association Between Short-Acting β2-Agonist Over-Prescription, and Patient-Reported Acquisition and Use on Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Data from Australia.

In Australia, short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) are available both over the counter (OTC) and on prescription. This ease of access may impact SABA use in the Australian population. Our aim was to assess patterns and outcome associations of prescribed, acquired OTC and reported use of SABA by Australians with asthma. This was a cross-sectional study, using data derived from primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) and patient completed questionnaires within Optimum Patient Care Research Database Australia (OPCRDA). A total of 720 individuals aged ≥ 12years with an asthma diagnosis in their EMRs and receiving asthma therapy were included. The annual number of SABA inhalers authorised on prescription, acquired OTC and reported, and the association with self-reported exacerbations and asthma control were investigated. 92.9% (n = 380/409) of individuals issued with SABA prescription were authorised ≥ 3 inhalers annually, although this differed from self-reported usage. Of individuals reporting SABA use (n = 546) in the last 12months, 37.0% reported using ≥ 3 inhalers. These patients who reported SABA overuse experienced 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-3.70) times more severe exacerbations and were 4.51 times (95% CI 3.13-6.55) more likely to have poor asthma control than those who reported using 1-2 SABA inhalers. Patients who did not receive SABA on prescription (43.2%; n = 311/720) also experienced 2.71 (95% CI 1.07-7.26) times more severe exacerbations than those prescribed 1-2 inhalers. Of these patients, 38.9% reported using OTC SABA and other prescription medications, 26.4% reported using SABA OTC as their only asthma medication, 13.2% were prescribed other therapies but not SABA OTC and 14.5% were not using any medication. Both self-reported SABA overuse and zero SABA prescriptions were associated with poor asthma outcomes. The disconnect between prescribing authorisation, OTC availability and actual use, make it difficult for clinicians to quantify SABA use.

Возможности профилактики рецидивов обструктивного бронхита у детей в сезон острых респираторных инфекций

The possibility of preventing episodes of bronchial obstruction (BO) in order to reduce the risk of bronchial asthma formation attracts the attention of many researchers and doctors. Ammonium glycyrrhizinate (Reglisam, "VIFITECH") is of practical interest in the search for promising anti-inflammatory drugs in this matter. Patients and methods. The study involved 110 children aged 3 to 7 years with symptoms of acute obstructive bronchitis, who had a history of at least 2 episodes of BO in the previous 6 months. Formed: the comparison group (n = 30) – received inhalations of ICS up to 1 month and SABA on demand and the main group (Reglisam) (n = 80) – additionally, the drug was prescribed to Reglisam for 24 weeks. The duration of patient follow-up was 24 weeks, five visits to the clinic were performed (day 1, week 1, week 4, week 12, week 24) and two telephone contacts (weeks 8 and 16). During visits, the following indicators were evaluated: computed bronchophonography (CBFG), cough on a visual analog scale (VAS), and the volume of additional therapy. Results. In the main Reglisam group, by the 3rd day of treatment, the intensity of daytime and nighttime cough was 30% lower relative to the comparison group (1.92 ± 0.05 vs 2.74 ± 0.03 points and 1.8 ± 0.04 vs 2.6 ± 0.04 points, respectively (p &lt; 0.05)), 70% of patients in the Reglisam group showed a decrease of CBFG to normal values, the proportion of such patients in the comparison group did not exceed 50%. In the Reglisam group, the average duration of BO was 38% less relative to the comparison group (6.9 ± 0.2 vs 11.2 ± 0.8 days, (p &lt; 0.05)), the duration of SABA use was 46% less relative to the comparison group (4.13 ± 0.7 vs 7.62 ± 0.8 days, p &lt; 0.05). When patients were followed up for the next 23 weeks in the main Reglisam group, the average number of ARI was 41% and BO was 83% less relative to the comparison group (1.3 ± 0.05 vs 2.2 ± 0.1 cases, 0.3 ± 0.001 vs 1.8 ± 0.21, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). In the Reglisam group, the average duration of ARI cases did not exceed 6.6 ± 0.2 days, in the comparison group it was significantly 40% longer (10.9 ± 0.4 days (p &lt; 0.05)). In the treatment of ARI in the main Reglisam group, the need for the use of ICS and SABA was 2 times lower relative to the comparison group (35% vs 77% and 50% vs 100%, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion. The inclusion of Reglisam in the complex therapy of acute obstructive bronchitis contributed to a rapid and effective reduction in the intensity of cough symptoms by the 3rd day of treatment, reducing the duration of use of SABA and the duration of the disease in general. In dynamics, against the background of a prophylactic course of Reglisam (23 weeks) during the epidemiological season of ARI, there was a significant decrease in the frequency of ARI, virus-induced relapses of OB and, as a consequence, the need for the use of ICS and SABA. Key words: coronavirus infection, COVID-19, post-COVID syndrome, children, rehabilitation, bronchial asthma, ammonium glycyrrhizinate, glycyrrhizic acid

Short-acting β2-agonist prescriptions in patients with asthma: findings from the South Korean cohort of SABINA III.

Despite short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse being associated with poor asthma outcomes, data on SABA use in South Korea is scarce. Herein, we describe prescription patterns of SABA and other asthma medications in patients from the South Korean cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study. This study included patients with asthma aged ≥ 12 years, who had ≥ 3 consultations with the same healthcare provider, and medical records containing data for ≥ 12 months prior to the study visit. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (per 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations) and practice type (primary or specialist care). Data on disease characteristics, asthma treatments, and clinical outcomes in the 12 months before the study visit were collected using electronic case report forms. Data from 476 patients (mean age, 55.4 years; female, 63.0%) were analyzed. Most patients were treated by specialists (83.7%) and had moderate-to-severe asthma (91.0%). Overall, 7.6% of patients were prescribed ≥ 3 SABA canisters (defined as over-prescription). In patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, 47.4% were over-prescribed SABA. Most patients (95.4%) were prescribed a fixed-dose combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting β2-agonist as maintenance therapy. Although asthma was well-controlled/partly-controlled in 91.6% of patients, 29.6% experienced ≥ 1 severe asthma exacerbation. SABA over-prescription was reported in nearly 50% of patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, underscoring the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations and educate physicians and patients on appropriate SABA use.

Real-World Study of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol on Asthma Control in the US.

Real-world asthma control data among patients initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) are limited. This study assessed rescue medication use and asthma-related exacerbations in patients with asthma before and after initiating single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI using administrative claims data. This retrospective, pre-post cohort study analyzed data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (September 18, 2016‒March 31, 2020). Patients aged ≥18 years that had ≥1 dispensing of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg (first dispensing = index date), ≥12 months of continuous health insurance enrollment prior to (pre-treatment) and following (post-treatment) FF/UMEC/VI initiation and ≥1 diagnosis of asthma during the pre-treatment period or on the index date were included. The primary endpoint was the number of oral corticosteroid (OCS) dispensings per patient per year during pre- and post-treatment periods. Secondary endpoints included asthma-related exacerbation rates and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use. Comparisons between pre- and post-treatment periods were made using risk and rate ratios. Overall, 890 patients with asthma initiating treatment with FF/UMEC/VI were included. The most recently dispensed controller medications prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation were inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (33.5%) and leukotriene modifiers (33.0%). Patients had a 29% reduction in the number of OCS dispensings (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.71 [0.65, 0.77], P < 0.001) during post-treatment versus pre-treatment, with a 23% reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS dispensing post-treatment (risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.77 [0.73, 0.82], P < 0.001). Significant reductions in rates (rate ratio [95% CI]) of asthma-related exacerbations (0.59 [0.52, 0.67], P < 0.001) and SABA use (0.80 [0.74, 0.86], P < 0.001) were also observed. In this real-world study, patients with asthma had significantly lower OCS use, asthma-related exacerbations, and SABA use following treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI compared with their pre-treatment period. These results suggest better asthma control following initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in a routine clinical practice setting.

Pharmacological treatment of asthma in Sweden from 2005 to 2015

Objective Despite access to effective therapies many asthma patients still do not have well-controlled disease. This is possibly related to underuse of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and overuse of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA). Our aim was to investigate longitudinal trends and associated factors in asthma treatment. Methods Two separate cohorts of adults with physician-diagnosed asthma were randomly selected from 14 hospitals and 56 primary health centers in Sweden in 2005 (n = 1182) and 2015 (n = 1225). Information about symptoms, maintenance treatment, and use of rescue medication was collected by questionnaires. Associations between treatment and sex, age, smoking, education, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, allergic asthma, and symptom control were analyzed using Pearson’s chi2-test. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression. Results Maintenance treatment with ICS together with long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) and/or montelukast increased from 39.2% to 44.2% (p = 0.012). The use of ICS + LABA as-needed increased (11.1–18.9%, p < 0.001), while SABA use decreased (46.4– 41.8%, p = 0.023). Regular treatment with ICS did not change notably (54.2–57.2%, p = 0.14). Older age, former smoking, and poor symptom control were related to treatment with ICS + LABA/montelukast. In 2015, 22.7% reported daily use of SABA. A higher step of maintenance treatment, older age, obesity, shorter education, current smoking, allergic asthma, low or very high physical activity, and a history of exacerbations were associated with daily SABA use. Conclusions The use of ICS + LABA both for maintenance treatment and symptom relief has increased over time. Despite this, the problem of low use of ICS and high use of SABA remains.

Evaluation of short-acting Beta-2-agonist prescriptions and associated clinical outcomes: Findings from the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) study in Asia

BackgroundThe extent of short-acting Beta-2-agonist (β2-agonist) (SABA) use across Asian countries is not well documented. As part of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we assessed SABA prescriptions and clinical outcomes in patients with asthma from Asia. MethodsThis cross-sectional study recruited patients (aged ≥12 years) with asthma from 8 Asian countries. Data on disease characteristics and asthma treatments were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by practice type (primary or specialist care) and investigator-defined asthma severity (per Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] 2017 recommendations). The association of SABA prescriptions with clinical outcomes was analyzed using multivariable regression models. ResultsOverall, 3066 patients were analyzed, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 51.8 (16.7) years; of these patients, 2116 (69%) were female, 2517 (82.1%) had moderate-to-severe asthma and 2498 (81.5%) and 559 (18.2%) were treated in specialist and primary care, respectively. In total, 1423 (46.4%) patients had partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma, with 1149 (37.5%) patients experiencing ≥1 severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year. Overall, 800 (26.7%) patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the previous year, which is regarded as overprescription and was associated with a significantly decreased odds of at least partly controlled asthma and increased incidence rates of severe exacerbations (P < 0.01 for both associations). ConclusionThe findings from this cohort of predominantly specialist-treated patients with asthma indicate SABA overprescription in at least 1 in every 4 patients, and this overprescription is associated with poor clinical outcomes. These data highlight the need for adherence to recently updated asthma treatment recommendations in Asia.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Respiratory Treatments: Results from the SABA CARBON International Study.

Healthcare systems are looking to reduce their carbon impact. Short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse (≥ 3 canisters/year) is common in asthma and linked to poor outcomes; however, its environmental impact remains unknown. As part of the CARBON programme, this study retrospectively quantified the carbon footprint of SABA and controller inhalers across all respiratory indications and SABA overuse in asthma in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), upper-middle-income countries and high-income countries across Africa, Asia Pacific, Latin America and the Middle East. Two data sources were utilised to evaluate the carbon contribution of inhalers to respiratory care. To quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with total inhaler use across all respiratory indications, inhaler sales data were obtained from IQVIA MIDAS® (Q4/2018-Q3/2019) and compared by dose to prevent confounding from differences in canister actuation counts. GHG emissions associated with SABA overuse in asthma were evaluated using prescription and self-reported over-the-counter purchase data from the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study (2019-2020). Inhaler-related GHG emissions were quantified using published data and product life cycle assessments. SABA accounted for > 50% of total inhaler use and inhaler-related emissions in most countries analysed. The total SABA-related emissions were estimated at 2.7 million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalents, accounting for 70% of total inhaler-related emissions. Among the countries, regions and economies analysed, per capita SABA use and associated emissions were higher in Australia, the Middle East and high-income countries. Most SABA prescriptions for asthma (> 90%) were given to patients already overusing SABA. Globally, SABA use/overuse is widespread and is the greatest contributor to the carbon footprint of respiratory treatment, regardless of the economic status of countries. Implementing evidence-based treatment recommendations, personalising treatment and reducing healthcare inequities, especially in LMICs, may improve disease control and patient outcomes, thereby reducing SABA overuse and associated carbon emissions beyond SABA use alone.

Over-prescription of short-acting β2-agonists remains a serious health concern in Kenya: results from the SABINA III study

BackgroundDespite a high asthma burden in Kenya, insights into asthma management practices, including prescription of short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs), are lacking. Therefore, this study describes patient demographics, disease characteristics, and asthma treatment patterns in the Kenyan cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study.MethodsPatients with asthma (aged ≥ 12 years) with medical records containing data for ≥ 12 months prior to the study visit from 19 sites across Kenya were included in this cross-sectional study and classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] recommendations) and practice type (primary/specialist care). Data on severe exacerbation history, prescribed asthma treatments, and over-the-counter (OTC) SABA purchases in the 12 months before the study visit and asthma symptom control at the time of the study visit were collated using electronic case report forms. All analyses were descriptive in nature.ResultsOverall, 405 patients were analyzed (mean age, 44.4 years; female, 68.9%), of whom 54.8% and 45.2% were enrolled by primary care clinicians and specialists, respectively. Most patients were classified with mild asthma (76.0%, GINA treatment steps 1−2) and were overweight or obese (57.0%). Only 19.5% of patients reported full healthcare reimbursement, with 59% receiving no healthcare reimbursement. The mean asthma duration of patients was 13.5 years. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 78.0% of patients, with 61.5% experiencing ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the preceding 12 months. Crucially, 71.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 3 SABA canisters, defined as over-prescription; 34.8% were prescribed ≥ 10 SABA canisters. Additionally, 38.8% of patients purchased SABA OTC, of whom 66.2% purchased ≥ 3 SABA canisters. Among patients with both SABA purchases and prescriptions, 95.5% and 57.1% had prescriptions for ≥ 3 and ≥ 10 SABA canisters, respectively. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS with a long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination, and oral corticosteroid bursts were prescribed to 58.8%, 24.7%, and 22.7% of patients, respectively.ConclusionsSABA over-prescription occurred in almost three-quarters of patients, with over one-third of patients purchasing SABA OTC. Therefore, SABA over-prescription is a major public health concern in Kenya, underscoring an urgent need to align clinical practices with latest evidence-based recommendations.

Short-acting β2-agonist prescription patterns in patients with asthma treated by specialists in Thailand: results from SABINA III

Objective Short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse is associated with poor asthma outcomes; however, the extent of SABA use in Thailand is largely unknown. As part of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we describe asthma treatment patterns, including SABA prescriptions, in patients treated by specialists in Thailand. Methods In this observational, cross-sectional study, patients (aged ≥12 years) with an asthma diagnosis were recruited by specialists from three Thai tertiary care centers using purposive sampling. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (per 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] recommendations). Data on sociodemographics, disease characteristics, and asthma treatment prescriptions were collected from existing medical records by healthcare providers and transcribed onto electronic case report forms. Analyses were descriptive. Results All 385 analyzed patients (mean age: 57.6 years; 69.6% female) were treated by specialists. Almost all (91.2%) patients were classified with moderate-to-severe asthma (GINA treatment steps 3–5), 69.1% were overweight/obese, and 99.7% reported partially/fully reimbursed healthcare. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 24.2% of patients; 23.1% experienced ≥1 severe asthma exacerbation in the preceding 12 months. Overall, SABAs were over-prescribed (≥3 canisters/year) in 28.3% of patients. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS/long-acting β2-agonists, oral corticosteroid (OCS) burst treatment, and long-term OCS were prescribed to 7.0, 93.2, 19.2, and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Additionally, 4.2% of patients reported purchasing SABA over the counter. Conclusions Despite receiving specialist treatment, 28.3% of patients were over-prescribed to SABA in the previous 12 months, highlighting a public health concern and the need to align clinical practices with current evidence-based recommendations.

SABAs as Reliever Medications in Asthma Management: Evidence-Based Science.

The role of as-needed inhaled short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) in the management of asthma has become a subject of debate due to differing opinions in the professional community relating to the use of SABAs. In this article, we summarize the current position of SABAs when used as reliever medications and examine the challenges to appropriate use including a critique of the data that have led to the condemnation of SABA used as a reliever. We consider the evidence for the appropriate use of SABA as a reliever together with practical solutions to ensure such use, including identifying patients at risk of misusing their SABA relievers and managing issues of inhaler technique and treatment adherence. We conclude that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance treatment with SABA used as-needed as a reliever is an effective and safe treatment for patients with asthma, with no scientific evidence of a causal link between SABA use as a reliever and mortality or serious adverse events (including exacerbations). Increased SABA use warns of a deterioration in asthma control, and patients at risk of misusing their ICS and SABA medication should be rapidly identified to ensure they are receiving adequate ICS-based controller therapy. Appropriate use of ICS-based controller therapy and as-needed SABA should be encouraged and promoted with educational activities.

Suboptimally controlled asthma in patients treated with inhaled ICS/LABA: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes

This observational claims-linked survey study assessed the prevalence of and risk factors for suboptimal asthma control and healthcare utilization in adults with asthma receiving fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA). Commercially insured adults from the Optum Research Database were invited to complete the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6). Among participants (N = 428), 36.4% (ACT-assessed) and 55.6% (ACQ-6-assessed) had inadequately controlled asthma. Asthma-related quality of life was worse and asthma-related healthcare resource utilization was higher in poorly controlled asthma. Factors associated with ACT-defined suboptimal asthma control in multivariate analysis included: frequent short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use, asthma-related outpatient visits, lower treatment adherence, and lower education levels. During follow-up, factors associated with asthma exacerbations and/or high SABA use included: inadequately controlled asthma (ACT-assessed), body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and high-dose ICS/LABA. Approximately 35–55% of adults with asthma were inadequately controlled despite FDC ICS/LABA; poor control was associated with worse disease outcomes.

High use of short-acting β2-agonists in COPD is associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and mortality.

Short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse has been associated with an increased risk of exacerbations in asthma; however, less is known about SABA use in COPD. Our aim was to describe SABA use and investigate potential associations between high SABA use and the risk of future exacerbations and mortality in COPD. This observational study identified COPD patients in primary care medical records in Sweden. Data were linked to the National Patient Registry, the Prescribed Drug Registry and the Cause of Death Registry. The index date was 12 months after the date of COPD diagnosis. During a 12-month prior to index baseline period, information on SABA use was collected. Patients were followed with respect to exacerbations and mortality for 12 months post index. Of the 19 794 COPD patients included (mean age 69.1 years, 53.3% females), 15.5% and 7.0% had collected ≥3 or ≥6 SABA canisters during the baseline period, respectively. A higher level of SABA use (≥6 canisters) was independently associated with a higher risk of both moderate and severe exacerbations (hazard ratio (HR) 1.28 (95% CI 1.17‒1.40) and 1.76 (95% CI 1.50‒2.06), respectively) during follow-up. In total, 673 (3.4%) patients died during the 12-month follow-up period. An independent association was found between high SABA use and overall mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07‒2.39). This association, however, was not found in patients using inhaled corticosteroids as maintenance treatment. In COPD patients in Sweden, high SABA use is relatively common and associated with a higher risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality.

Economic Consequences of the Overuse of Short-Acting ß-Adrenergic Agonists in the Treatment of Asthma in Spain.

To determine the relationship between short-acting ß-adrenergic agonist (SABA) overuse and health care resource use and costs in asthma patients in routine clinical practice. A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted in Spanish primary and specialized care centers using the BIG-PAC medical records database. The study population comprised asthma patients ≥12 years of age who attended ≥2 consultations during 2017 and had 1-year follow-up data available. The main outcomes were demographics, comorbidities, medication, and clinical and health care resource use and costs. The relationship between SABA overuse and health care costs and between asthma severity and health care costs was determined. The SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) study included 39 555 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 49.8 (20.7) years (64.2% female). The Charlson comorbidity index was 0.7 (1.0). SABA overuse (≥3 canisters/y) was 28.7% (95%CI, 27.7-29.7), with a mean of 3.3 (3.6) canisters/y. Overall, 5.1% of patients were prescribed ≥12 canisters/y. SABA overuse was correlated with health care costs (ρ=0.621; P<.001). The adjusted mean annual cost/patient according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2019) classification of asthma severity was €2231, €2345, €2735, €3473, and €4243 for steps 1-5, respectively (P<.001). Regardless of asthma severity, SABA overuse yielded a significant increase in health care costs per patient and year (€5702 vs €1917, P<.001) compared with recommended use (<2 canisters/y). SABA overuse yields high costs for the Spanish National Health System. Costs increased with severity of asthma.