S2 Alar-iliac Screws Research Articles

Pelvic parameters directly influence ideal S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory

BackgroundThe utilization of the S2 Alar-Iliac (S2AI) screw provides an optimal method of spinopelvic fixation. The free-hand placement of these screws obviates the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy and relies heavily on sacropelvic anatomy; variations of this anatomy could alter the ideal screw trajectory. The S2AI corridor is near several neurovascular structures, thus an accurate trajectory is critical. The reported angles of trajectory vary within the literature and a paucity of data exists on how patient morphometry influences ideal screw trajectory. We sought to examine the relationship between ideal screw trajectory and pelvic parameters. MethodsThe records of 99 consecutive patients with degenerative thoracolumbar pathology were reviewed and pelvic parameters including sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence were measured with preoperative standing radiographs. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstructions, an ideal S2AI trajectory was defined and anteroposterior (horizontal) and cephalocaudal (sagittal) angles were recorded. ResultsPelvic tilt was found to have a moderate inverse correlation with cephalocaudal screw trajectory (r=-0.467, p-value=0.006). Pelvic incidence and sacral slope had weaker correlations with cephalocaudal screw angle. In subgroup analysis, patients with high pelvic tilt (>20°) had a significantly lower cephalocaudal screw trajectory (24.9 ± 3.7° versus 29.8 ± 2.8°, p-value=<0.001) compared to those with a normal pelvic tilt (≤20°). ConclusionsThis study found an inverse relationship between pelvic tilt and cephalocaudal S2AI screw trajectory. Therefore, the sagittal angle of insertion becomes increasingly more perpendicular to the floor (less caudally orientated) as pelvic tilt increases in reference to a patient positioned prone on an operating table parallel to the floor. This may bolster safety and efficacy when utilizing the free-hand technique for placement of the S2AI screw as it allows the surgeon to plan a more ideal trajectory by accounting for pelvic parameters.

The use of triangular implants to enhance sacropelvic fixation: a finite element investigation

Background contextLong thoracolumbar fixation and fusion have become a consolidated treatment for severe spinal disorders. Concomitant sacropelvic fixation with S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws is frequently performed to limit instrumentation failure and pseudarthrosis at the lumbosacral junction. PurposeThis study explored the use of triangular titanium implants in different configurations in which the implants supplemented standard sacropelvic fixation with S2AI screws in order to further increase the stability of S2AI fixation. Study designFinite element study. MethodsFour T10-pelvis instrumented models were built: pedicle screws and rods in T10–S1 (PED); pedicle screws and rods in T10–S1, and bilateral S2 alar-iliac screws (S2AI); pedicle screws and rods in T10–S1, bilateral S2AI screws, and triangular implants inserted bilaterally in a sacral alar-iliac trajectory (Tri-SAI); pedicle screws and rods in T10–S1, bilateral S2AI screws and two bilateral triangular titanium implants inserted in a lateral trajectory (Tri-Lat). The models were tested under pure moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. RESULTSSIJ motion was reduced by 50% to 66% after S2AI fixation; the addition of triangular titanium implants in either a SAI or a lateral trajectory further reduced it. S2AI, Tri-SAI, and Tri-Lat resulted in significantly lower stresses in S1 pedicle screws when compared to PED. Triangular implants had a protective effect on the maximal stresses in S2AI screws, especially when placed in the SAI trajectory. Sacropelvic fixation did not have any protective effect on the posterior rods. ConclusionsSupplementing S2AI screws with triangular implants had a protective effect on the S2AI screws themselves, as well as the S1 pedicle screws, in the tested model. Clinical significanceTriangular implants can substantially reduce the residual flexibility of the SIJ with respect to S2AI fixation alone, suggesting a possible role in patients needing reinforced fixation. In vivo investigation is needed to determine if these in vitro effects translate into clinically important differences.

A 3D-Printed Simulator and Teaching Module for Placing S2-Alar-Iliac Screws.

The concept of the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw was developed approximately one decade ago and has rapidly become an important component of spinal arthrodesis. Two challenges to placing S2AI screws are gaining an intuition for free-hand screw placement trajectory and acquisition of the appropriate radiograph to both guide screw placement and diagnose misplacement. To present the design and manufacture of an S2AI screw placement simulator and teaching module that addresses both challenges. This simulator involves using a 3D printer to create a life-sized pelvis. Participants first used this print to practice placing free-hand S2AI screws. Then participants used another print to practice taking radiographs showing the posterior superior iliac spine-anterior superior iliac spine corridor (teardrop) view. The accuracy of screw placement increased from 17 to 80% on the left side and 7 to 100% on the right side. The number of radiographs taken by each participant to obtain the teardrop view decreased after practice with the simulator compared to baseline. Practice with the S2AI simulator led to an improved intuition of an appropriate free-hand S2AI screw trajectory and a decrease in the number of radiographs needed for obtaining the correct diagnostic view.

Extra-articular Portion of the Sacroiliac Joint-Between the Sacral and Pelvic Tuberosities: An Anatomical Guide for the S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Trajectory.

Study Design:A novel technique for S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement was analyzed.Objectives:Accurate confirmation of the S2AI screw trajectory with free-hand techniques is not simple, although some anatomical landmarks have been reported. To overcome the drawback, we aimed to introduce our technique for S2AI screw placement assisted with a guidewire using a new anatomical landmark.Methods:A total of 104 S2AI screws of 52 patients who underwent S2AI screw placement were investigated. Navigation software was used to simulate S2AI screw placement preoperatively. Screw placement was performed with the nonfluoroscopic free-hand technique. In this technique, a guidewire is inserted into the ilium from the extra-articular portion of the sacroiliac joint just lateral to the ideal screw entry point toward the tip of the greater trochanter and guides the screw trajectory. If the direction of the guidewire is satisfactory, all procedures of screw insertion are performed accordingly. The screw accuracy was assessed with computed tomography.Results:The modal size of the screw was 9.5 mm × 90 mm. The average horizontal angle was 42.0° (SD = 5.1°) on the right and 40.7° (SD = 4.7°) on the left. Of the 104 screws, 4 screws (3.9%) breached dorsally. No screw-related complication was observed.Conclusions:Because the guidewire can be inserted at an angle according to the individual morphology of the sacroiliac joint, it will be a reliable guide for the screw trajectory. This technique with a guidewire would help improve the accuracy of S2AI screw placement.

Clinical Effectiveness of S2-Alar Iliac Screws in Spinopelvic Fixation in Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Systematic Literature Review.

Study Design:Systematic literature review.Objectives:To comprehensively review the S2-alar iliac (S2-AI) screw technique for pelvic fixation in pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis.Methods:Articles identified from the PubMed and EMBASE databases were reviewed for relevance and applicability, and the studies were summarized.Results:Eight articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 277 pediatric patients underwent spinopelvic fixation using S2-AI fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis; the mean follow-up was 3 years (range = 0.75-6 years). Six articles had level III evidence (5 retrospective cohort studies, 1 observational study), and 2 articles had level IV evidence (case series). Wound complications occurred in 34 (12.2%) patients. Instrumentation complications occurred in 36 patients (13.0%), including lucency around the screw (6.5%), screw fracture (3.6%), disengaging of the set/screw or rod from the tulip head (2.8%), and screw displacement (0.7%). Three patients (1.1%) required reoperation for instrumentation failures. The overall reoperation rate—including 3 hardware replacements and 3 cases of L5-S1 pseudarthrosis—was 2.1%. The mean Cobb angle correction was 51.4°, and the mean pelvic obliquity correction was 14.8°; deformity correction was maintained at 3- and 5-year follow-ups. There were 10 (3.6%) cases of implant prominence/implant-related pain, 1 case of sacroiliac joint pain (resolved with longer screw placement), and no major neurological or vascular complications secondary to S2-AI screw placement.Conclusions:This review suggests that the use of S2-AI screws in pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis is efficacious with a reasonable safety profile and provides a useful technique for pelvic fixation in children with scoliosis.

Comparative tomographic study of the iliac screw and the S2-alar-iliac screw in children

OBJECTIVES:The recent advancements in spine fixation aid in the treatment of complex spinal pathologies. Both the iliac screw (IS) and the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw provide adequate stability in the fixation of complex lumbosacral spine pathologies, leading to a significant increased rate of using these techniques in the daily practice of the spine surgeons. This study aims to analyze, describe, and compare the insertion and positioning parameters of the S2AI screw and IS techniques in children without spinal deformities.METHODS:An observational retrospective study was conducted at a university hospital in 2018, with 25 computed tomography (CT) images selected continuously. Mann-Whitney-Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed. The reliability of the data was assessed using the intraclass correlation. The data were stratified by age group only for Pearson’s correlation analysis.RESULTS:The mean age was 11.7 years (4.5 SD). The mean IS length was 106.63 mm (4.59 SD). The mean length of the S2AI screw was 104.13 mm (4.22 SD). The mean skin distance from the IS entry point was 28.13 mm (4.27 SD) and that for the S2AI screw was 39.96 mm (4.54 SD).CONCLUSIONS:Through CT, the S2AI screw trajectory was observed to have a greater bone thickness and skin distance than the IS. There was a linear correlation between age and screw length for both techniques. A similar relationship was observed between skin distance and age for the S2AI screw technique. In children, the S2AI screw technique presents advantages such as greater cutaneous coverage and implant thickness than the IS technique.

Biomechanics of sacropelvic fixation: a comprehensive finite element comparison of three techniques.

Sacropelvic fixation is frequently used in combination with thoracolumbar instrumentation for complex deformity correction and is commonly associated with pseudoarthrosis, implant failure and loosening. This study compared pedicle screw fixation (PED) with three different sacropelvic fixation techniques, namely iliac screws (IL), S2 alar-iliac screws (S2AI) and laterally placed triangular titanium implants (SI), all in combination with lumbosacral instrumentation, accounting for implant micromotion. Existing finite element models of pelvis-L5 of three patients including lumbopelvic instrumentation were utilized. Moments of 7.5 Nm in the three directions combined with a 500N compressive load were simulated. Measured metrics included flexibility, instrumentation stresses and bone-implant interface loads. Fixation effectively reduced the sacroiliac flexibility. Compared to PED, IL and S2AI induced a reduction in peak stresses in the S1 pedicle screws. Rod stresses were mostly unaffected by S2AI and SI, but IL demonstrated a stress increase. In comparison with a previous work depicting full osteointegration, SI was found to have similar instrumentation stresses as those due to PED. Fixation with triangular implants did not result in stress increase on the lumbosacral instrumentation, likely due to the lack of connection with the posterior rods. IL and S2AI had a mild protective effect on S1 pedicle screws in terms of stresses and bone-implant loads. IL resulted in an increase in the rod stresses. A comparison between this study and previous work incorporating full osteointegration demonstrates how these results may be applied clinically to better understand the effects of different treatments on patient outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Study DesignA retrospective cohort study.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screw loosening following lumbosacral fixation, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.Overview of LiteratureAlthough SAI screws allow surgeons to perform lumbosacral fixation with a low profile and enhanced biomechanical strength, screw loosening following surgery can occur in some cases. However, few studies have investigated the prevalence and risk factors for SAI screw loosening.MethodsThis retrospective study included 35 patients (mean age, 72.8±8.0 years; male, 10; female, 25) who underwent lumbosacral fixation using SAI screws with at least 2 years of follow-up. SAI screw loosening and L5–S bony fusion were assessed using computed tomography. The period for which the screws appeared loose and the risk factors for SAI screw loosening were investigated 2 years after surgery.ResultsA total of 70 SAI screws and 70 S1 pedicle screws were inserted. Loosening was observed 0.5, 1, and 2 years after surgery in 17 (24.3%), 35 (50.0%), and 35 (50.0%) SAI screws, respectively. Bony fusion rate at L5–S was significantly lower in patients with SAI screw loosening than in those without screw loosening (65.0% vs. 93.3%, p =0.048). The score for SAI screw contact with the iliac cortical bone and the bony fusion rate at L5–S were significantly lower in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (1.8±0.5 vs. 2.2±0.3, p <0.001, respectively). Postoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis was significantly higher in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (7.9°±15.4° vs. 0.5°±8.7°, p =0.02, respectively).ConclusionsSAI screw loosening is closely correlated with pseudoarthrosis at L5–S. Appropriate screw insertion and optimal lumbar lordosis restoration are important to prevent postoperative complications related to SAI screws.

Grade II Spondylolisthesis: Reverse Bohlman Procedure with Transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 Alar Iliac Screws Placed with Robotic Guidance

Grade II spondylolisthesis remains a complex surgical pathology for which there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical strategies. Surgical strategies vary regarding extent of reduction, use of instrumentation/interbody support, and anterior versus posterior approaches with or without decompression. Here we provide the first report on the efficacy of robotic spinal surgery systems in support of the treatment of grade II spondylolisthesis. Using 2 illustrative cases, we provide a technical report describing how robotic spinal surgery platform can be used to treatment grade II spondylolisthesis with a novel instrumentation strategy. We describe how the "reverse Bohlman" technique to achieve a large anterior fusion construct spanning the pathological level and buttressed by the adjacent level above, coupled with a novel, high-fidelity posterior fixation scheme with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screws placed in a minimally invasive fashion with robot guidance allows for the best chance of fusion in situ. The reverse Bohlman technique coupled with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2AI screw fixation accomplishes the surgical goals of creating a solid fusion construct, avoiding neurologic injury with aggressive reduction, and halting the progression of anterolisthesis. The use of robot guidance allows for efficient placement of these difficult screw trajectories in a minimally invasive fashion.

Optimal Trajectory and Length of S2 Alar Iliac Screws: A 3-Dimensional Computed-aided Design Study.

A radiographic study of computed tomography scans of the pelvis converted to 3-dimensional imaging. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal length and trajectory of S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screws. Solid pelvic fixation is a necessary component in thoracolumbar deformity surgery to protect sacral fixation and promote arthrodesis. The S2AI technique has been promoted as a way to reduce hardware prominence and instrumentation issues associated with traditional iliac fixation. In total, 64 of 100 patients randomly selected from our institution's spine registry were able to be converted to 3-dimensional imaging. Virtual screws were then placed in the optimal position for an S2AI screw on each side of the pelvis. The lateral and inferior angles were measured off-axial and sagittal planes, respectively. The distances from the notch and the remaining available screw length were also recorded. The average patient age was 38±16 years. The average lateral angle was 42.5±2.0 degrees and the inferior angle was 18.2±1.8 degrees. The screws fit bilaterally in all 64 patients without cortical breach. The remaining available screw distance was measured in all patients and found to be 40.5±8.7 mm. The average distance from the sciatic notch was 13.8±4.1 mm. Men had significantly more potential screw length when compared with women. We found an average inferior angle of 18.2 degrees, which is less than the previously described angle range of 20-40 degrees. These findings suggest that an ideal trajectory may be significantly different than the previously described trajectory. We found that with the optimal trajectory, a 100 mm screw can fit in all patients without concern for cortical breach of the pelvis or violation of the hip joint.

USE OF ALAR-ILIAC S2 SCREW TECHNIQUE IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the results related to the use of pelvic fixation with alar-iliac S2 screw in individuals with myelomeningocele. Methods: Retrospective study of cases surgically treated with this technique, between January 2015 and March 2018 at the Pequeno Principe Children's Hospital. Radiographic images and clinical records were analyzed in search of complications. Results: Twelve patients with mean age of 13.3 years were treated at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 11.5 months. The mean of the highest magnitude curve measured by the Cobb angle in the preoperative period was 83.8°; while in the last postoperative follow-up was 29.5° (correction of 65%). The mean pelvic obliquity was 23.1° in the preoperative period and in the postoperative was 7.1° (correction of 69%). Only 2 cases (17%) with complications associated with material failure at the level of sacroiliac fixation, due to the unilateral release of the head of the polyaxial S2 iliac screw. Conclusions: The technique of pelvic fixation in the scoliosis secondary to myelomeningocele with the use of S2 alar-iliac screws has shown satisfactory results, with only two complications (17%) directly related to pelvic fixation in the operated cases. Level of Evidence IV; Series of Cases.

Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study

This study aimed to implement laterally placed triangular titanium implants as a technique of sacropelvic fixation in long posterior lumbar instrumentation and to characterize the effects of iliac screws, S2 alar-iliac screws and of triangular implants on rod and S1 pedicle screw stresses. Four female models of the lumbopelvic spine were created. For each of them, five finite element models replicating the following configurations were generated: intact, posterior fixation with pedicle screws to S1 (PED), with PED and iliac screws (IL), with PED and S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws, and with PED and bilateral triangular titanium implants (SI). Simulations were conducted in compression, flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Rod stresses in the L5-S1 segment as well as in the S1 pedicle screws were compared. One anatomical model was not simulated due to dysmorphia of the sacroiliac joints. PED resulted in the highest implant stresses. Values up to 337MPa in lateral bending were noted, which were more than double than the other configurations. When compared with IL, S2AI and SI resulted in lower stresses in both screws and rods (on average 33% and 41% for S2AI and 17% and 50% for SI). Implant stresses after S2AI and SI fixations were lower than those attributable to IL. Therefore, pedicle screws and rods may have a lower risk of mechanical failure when coupled with sacropelvic fixation via S2AI or triangular titanium implants, although the risk of clinical loosening remains an area of further investigation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Sacropelvic Fixation With S2 Alar Iliac Screws May Prevent Sacroiliac Joint Pain After Multisegment Spinal Fusion.

A retrospective study. To examine the postoperative incidence of sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) at the lower fusion level following multisegment fusion. Recently, multisegment fusion is being increasingly performed. While proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) commonly develops following multisegment fusion, SIJP also commonly occurs following this surgery. In surgery for adult spinal deformity, fixation is often extended to the pelvis to include the sacroiliac joint. Therefore, the question of whether SIJP occurs in such cases is interesting. Here, we examined postoperative incidence of SIJP at the lower fusion level, including the incidence of PJK, and postoperative lumbopelvic alignment. Participants included 77 patients who underwent corrective fusion (≥3 segments). Patients were divided into three groups based on the lower fixation end: L5 (L5), S (sacrum), and P (pelvis). In the P group, an S2 alar iliac screw was used. Postoperative incidence of SIJP and PJK in each group was examined along with lumbopelvic parameters. SIJP incidence was 16.7%, 26.1%, and 4.2% in the L5, S, and P groups, respectively, indicating the highest value in the S group and a significantly lower value in the P group. PJK incidence was 23.3%, 30.4%, and 29.2% in the L5, P, and S groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Regarding postoperative lumbopelvic parameters, there was no significant difference between the groups; however, lumbar lordosis tended to be better in the P group. SIJP incidence was extremely high with fixation to the sacrum, and in the group with fixation to the pelvis, there was hardly any SIJP. Sacropelvic fixation using S2 alar iliac screws could prevent SIJP onset following multisegment fusion. 3.

Iliac screw versus S2 alar-iliac screw fixation in adults: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVEIn a meta-analysis, the authors sought to compare outcomes after iliac screw (IS) versus S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation in adult patients.METHODSA PubMed/MEDLINE database search was performed for studies comparing IS and S2AI screw fixation techniques in adults. Levels of evidence were assigned based on the North American Spine Society guidelines. Three outcomes were examined: 1) revision surgery rate secondary to mechanical failure or wound complications, 2) surgical site infection rate, and 3) screw prominence/pain. Data were pooled and outcomes compared between techniques. Absolute risk reductions (ARRs) were also calculated for outcome measures.RESULTSFive retrospective cohort studies (all level III evidence) were included in our analysis. A total of 323 adult patients were included-147 in the IS group (45.5%) and 176 in the S2AI group (54.5%). Overall, revision surgery due to mechanical failure or wound complications was needed in 66 of 323 patients (revision surgery rate 20.4%)-27.9% in the IS group and 14.2% in the S2AI group (13.7% ARR; p < 0.001). Four studies reported wound infections among 278 total patients, with an infection rate of 12.6% (35/278)-25.4% in the IS group and 2.6% in the S2AI group (22.8% ARR; p < 0.001). Three studies examined development of screw prominence/pain; combined, these studies reported screw prominence/pain in 21 of 215 cases (9.8%)-18.1% in the IS group and 1.8% in the S2AI group (16.3% ARR; p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSS2AI screw fixation in adults has a significantly lower mechanical failure and complication rate than IS fixation based on the current best available evidence.

Surgical outcome of adult spinal surgery using iliac screw and S2 alar iliac screw

Surgical outcome of adult spinal surgery using iliac screw and S2 alar iliac screw

TOMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE S2-ALAR-ILIAC SCREW TECHNIQUE IN BRAZILIAN WOMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: Lumbosacral fixation presents problems in its arthrodesis, mainly due to pseudoarthrosis. Iliac screws minimize this problem, however, they show problems in the operative wound. The S2-Alar-iliac (S2AI) screw presents a lower rate of these complications. The anatomical differences between the populations and the sexes analyzed in the literature justify the study of the S2AI screw technique in Brazilian women. Methods: A total of 14 adult female CT scans were analyzed by 4 evaluators. Results: The mean bone length was 131.8 mm, the largest bone diameter was 22.6 mm, and the smallest bone diameter was 22.6 mm. Conclusions: The data presented are compatible with the literature and may assist spine surgeons in choosing the best implant and surgical technique. Level of Evidence I; Diagnostic Studies — Investigating a Diagnostic Test (anatomical investigation).

Robotic versus freehand S2 alar iliac fixation: in-depth technical considerations.

Achieving fixation and fusion across the lumbosacral junction has been a challenge for spinal deformity surgeons ever since the development of instrumentation. The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) trajectory has been introduced as a method of pelvic fixation to decrease strain on S1 screws. The S2AI screws differ in several ways from traditional iliac screws. The trajectory of these screws helps avoid the use of offset connectors due to the screws alignment with the proximal pedicle screw instrumentation. Current literature shows that S2AI screws are effective with low complication rates, but the path of these screws is intimately associated with major neural and vascular structures. Use of robotic guidance to obtain the correct trajectory has been shown to be both safe and effective in obtaining proper trajectory of S2AI screws with over 95% accuracy. Herein, we report on the technical considerations and radiographic outcomes surrounding robotic and freehand insertion of S2AI screws.

Long fusion to the pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screws can induce changes in pelvic incidence in adult spinal deformity patients: analysis of predictive factors in a retrospective cohort

To verify whether pelvic incidence (PI) would change in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who underwent long instrumentation using S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws and to identify factors associated with the change in PI. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent spinal surgery using S2AI screws between November 2014 and January 2017 at our institution. Patients aged 20years or above with available radiographs were included. According to the change in PI, patients were divided into two groups, group C: PI variance reached 5 or more degrees postoperatively and group NC: PI changed less than 5°. A total of 47 patients (3 males, 44 females; mean age, 52.47 ± 15.80years) were included in this study. PI significantly decreased from 51.25° ± 14.80° to 40.43° ± 14.23° in group C (n = 26), with a mean change in 11.52° ± 6.17° (P < 0.05), but changed from 47.00° ± 13.18° to 46.57° ± 13.71° in group NC without statistical significance. Intergroup analysis showed that change in PI, preoperative PI-LL, preoperative LL, preoperative SVA, and postoperative PT were significantly different between both groups. Correlation analysis showed that the change in PI and preoperative LL and PI were significantly associated. The formula provided by the regression analysis was ΔPI = - 3.108 - 0.11PreLL + 0.211PrePI. Our study showed that PI decreased in 55% of ASD patients after spinal surgery using S2AI screws. Greater preoperative PI-LL mismatch and PI, as well as lumbar kyphosis, were associated with postoperative change in PI. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Effect of the screw type (S2-alar-iliac and iliac), screw length, and screw head angle on the risk of screw and adjacent bone failures after a spinopelvic fixation technique: A finite element analysis.

PurposeSpinopelvic fixations involving the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) and iliac screws are commonly used in various spinal fusion surgeries. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical characteristics, specifically the risk of screw and adjacent bone failures of S2AI screw fixation with those of iliac screw fixation using a finite element analysis (FEA).MethodsA three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of a healthy spinopelvis was generated. The pedicle screws were placed on the L3-S1 with three different lengths of the S2AI and iliac screws (60 mm, 75 mm, and 90 mm). In particular, two types of the S2AI screw, 15°- and 30°-angled polyaxial screw, were adopted. Physiological loads, such as a combination of compression, torsion, and flexion/extension loads, were applied to the spinopelvic FE model, and the stress distribution as well as the maximum von Mises equivalent stress values were calculated.ResultsFor the iliac screw, the highest stress on the screw was observed with the 75-mm screw, rather than the 60-mm screw. The bones around the iliac screw indicated that the maximum equivalent stress decreased as the screw length increased. For the S2AI screw, the lowest stress was observed in the 90-mm screw length with a 30° head angle. The bones around the S2AI screw indicated that the lowest stress was observed in the 90-mm screw length and a 15° head angle.ConclusionsIt was found that the S2AI screw, rather than the iliac screw, reduced the risk of implant failure for the spinopelvic fixation technique, and the 90-mm screw length with a 15° head angle for the S2AI screw could be biomechanically advantageous.

Friday, September 28, 2018 10:30 AM–12:00 PM abstracts: deformity: technical factors: 170. Comparison of three lumbopelvic fixation techniques in long fusion to the sacrum in osteoporotic adult spinal deformity patients (>60 years): clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Iliac screw techniques provide additional biomechanical stabilization to S1 in long fusion to the sacrum. Recently S2 Alar iliac screw (S2AI) fixation became more popular than traditional iliac screw (TIS) (entry point posterior superior iliac spine), and distal iliac screw (DIS) (entry point posterior inferior iliac spine) due to the lower implant profile and need for less extensive soft tissue dissection. S2AI fixes the sacroiliac (SI) joint differently from TIS and DIS. PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes between TIS, DIS and S2AI fixation in osteoporotic adult spinal deformity patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 158 adult spinal deformity patients. OUTCOME MEASURES ODI questionnaire was evaluated for clinical outcome. METHODS A total of 158 (103f, 55m) adult spinal deformity patients pts who underwent long fusion to the sacrum with three different iliac screw techniques (TIS, DIS, S2AI) were reviewed. Radiologic parameters were compared between preop and f/up standing x-rays. Hospital charts and f/up CT scans were used to compare the screw lengths, diameters, and implant related complications including S1 and iliac screw loosening, rod breakage, sacroiliac joint dissociation (SID), surgical site infections (SSI) and hematoma. ODI scores were compared for clinical assessment. RESULTS A total of 54 patients had TIS, 51 patients had DIS, 53 patients had S2AI fixation. Mean ages were 67, 71, 68; mean f/up was 54.2 (24–174) months, respectively. Iliac screw lengths were 85mm, 90mm, 105mm; diameters were 9.0mm, 8.5mm, 9.5mm for TIS, DIS, S2AI, respectively. There were seven patients (12.9%) in TIS, six patients (11.7%) in DIS & three patients (5.6%) in S2AI with implant related complications. One patient (1.8%) in TIS and one patient (1.9%) in DIS group showed SID (TIS=1, DIS=1, S2AI=0). Postop hematoma was detected in 14 patients (8.8%) (TIS=4, DIS=7, S2AI=3) and SSI developed in two patients (1.2%) (TIS=1, DIS=1, S2AI=0). ODI scores improved in all groups. CONCLUSIONS All techniques provided sufficient stability for lumbosacral fusion in adult spinal deformity patients. S2 Alar iliac screw technique showed lower implant related complication rates when compared to both iliac screw techniques. Traditional iliac screwand Distal iliac screw had higher rates of hematoma and surgical site infections due to extensive soft tissue dissection compared to S2 Alar iliac screw. S2 Alar iliac screw does not lead to sacroiliac joint dissociation as it provides stability by fixing the sacroiliac joint.