changing social system as one which does not coIntain enough by way of promised satisfaction in return for adherence to the new norms, and so seems to reject the emergent system in preference for the more traditional form of social organization. The ready group, by contrast, has good reason to see the emergent system as containing promises of even more of the relatively advantaged positions which they have come to enjoy, and hence they seem to welcome, or at least, to refuse to impede, the development of the new system. We are suggesting, in short, that it is not a difference between mental health and mental sickness; or between integration and anomie. Rather, since there is some degree of option between a traditional and a new system and since the balance of responsibility and reward strikes each group as different, one seeks to retain the old, and the other seeks to institute the new. Yet the metaphor in which we have put this difference carries in its vocabulary too much of the actors' subjective definitions of the situations. For it seems clear, from the materials on selfperception and self-image, relative to various others, that ordinary measures of subjective definitions do not indicate as much difference in the self-images as one would expect from the sharp differences in attitudes toward the new ideas. By contrast, the objective indices of difference in such things as income, occupation, education, and the like, do, correspond far more closely with the differences in attitudes. Could it be, then, that the actors here are responding to the pressures of the system upon them in ways unknown to them consciously and unverbalizable by them, and hence not as easily discoverable from a codification of their views of life as from a straightforward analysis of their positions in the social order? Could it also be, then, that, if the inequalities in position and life chances between the hard core and the others were to be reduced over time, the differences between their attitudes toward the Negroes and desegregation would be correspondingly reduced, again in ways unknown to and unperceived by them, and perhaps in spite of their verbalizations to the contrary? Some such destratification and equalization seem to be strongly indicated by our findings.