In their article in World Journal of Surgery, Magee and co-workers have done a commendable job of quantifying the burden of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) in developing countries, using the disability adjusted life years (DALY) framework [1]. The defined economic gain will help in the campaign for a CL/P-free world. In the same issue, Corlew advocates an economic CL/P model for effective health policy [2]. As surgeons from the developing world and facilitators of many such operative camps, we would like to contribute a few additions toward this goal. The authors state that the CL/P missions were a mix of international and local resources, with a huge variation in operating costs. The cost per DALY averted ranged from US$278 to US$1,827. Although it is not explicitly stated, that team transportation costs exceeded the charges for cargo and supplies suggests that the Chinandega, Nicaraugua, mission could be an international mission. Perhaps this is the most important conclusion of the article: that local/hybrid missions are more cost effective than international missions. The ability of Operation Smile to build local capacity is a worthy model for achieving a long-term and sustainable model for achieving a CL/P-free world. In the article by Magee and co-workers, for 8 missions, cost calculations were based on primary CL/P cases, which were only 56.11% (303/540) of the total cases. The remainder include a wide spectrum of procedures, from rhinoplasty to skin tag excision, and their inclusion would markedly affect the CL/P cost calculation. We also observed inconsistencies in the tables. In describing the Chinandega mission [1], Table 2 shows the number of cases of CL \5 years to be greater (26) than the total number of cases in Table 3 (23). For the Ho Chi Minh City and Chinandega missions [1], respectively, Table 3 shows the total number of CL/P cases to be 60 and 44, whereas Table 5 indicates totals of 62 and 46. Second, we must report as hosts that Operation Smile practices are ‘‘in accordance with the global standard of care’’. But, in camps of certain organizations, there is inconsistency in the levels of surgical skill and competence represented, and this has resulted in camps being discontinued midway through a mission. It is assumed that visiting surgeons are trained in international surgery and that it is appropriate that they be allowed to operate without regional licensing or recertification. We are also concerned about the lack of follow-up and management of complications, as well as the need for reoperation, long-term speech therapy, and orthodontics, all of which become the responsibility of the host organization. Although ‘‘lack of adequate local facilities’’ is a common refrain among visiting medical personnel, the costs to local hospitals of aftercare have not been added into the DALY calculation. Third, in a typical Indian metropolitan tertiary hospital an average of 47 CL/P patients per year would undergo operation. At such a center, the total cost to the patient, including travel and local stay, is approximately Rs. 12,000 (US$261), and at a rural camp with local resources the cost to the patient is approximately Rs. 6,000 (US$130.50) [Rs. 46 = US$1]. Finally, although studies [1, 3] claim that a substantial surgical burden of CL/P has been addressed by international missions, we must emphasize that there are not enough data regarding CL/P prevalence in the developing P. Thakkar (&) N. Roy Department of Surgery, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Hospital, Anushaktinagar, Chembur, Mumbai 400094, India e-mail: purvithakkar@gmail.com
Read full abstract