Hebrew Studies 45 (2004) 328 Reviews public relief program that guaranteed their material endowment (pp. 171– 172). However, in the Hebrew Bible, the Omrides and more particularly Ahab do not stand out as YHWH-alone champions but are always associated with Baal and Ashera. In other words, the textual data (e.g., 1 Kgs 16:29– 17:1; 18; 19; etc.) do not appear to mesh with this reconstruction. Bennett includes a final brief concluding chapter 6 (pp. 173–176) which is followed by a bibliography (pp. 177–200) and three indices (pp. 201–209) involving authors, subjects, and Scripture references. While his concern for the oppressed is laudable and important, his methodological presuppositions debilitate the results. At the end, one is left with one simple decision: either to accept Bennett’s application of critical law theory, that is, law as a tool in the hand of some groups to manipulate, empower, or marginalize social subgroups , or to reject it. While it may not be fashionable, I would rather favor a more thorough dialogue with the primary data (i.e., the biblical text) instead of beginning with a closed model that will then be used as a filter to read that primary data. After reading Bennett’s work, which is so heavily indebted to social science research and methodology, one wonders what happened to the theological dimension of the biblical texts. Should it not be possible that ethics , theology, and social sciences try to meet on more equal grounds when deciphering the biblical text? Gerald A. Klingbeil River Plate Adventist University Libertador San Martin, Argentina kling@uap.edu.ar ISAIAH 56–66: A NEW TRANSLATION WITH INTRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY. By Joseph Blenkinsopp. AB. Pp. xvi + 348. New York: Doubleday, 2003. Cloth, $45.00. This is the third and final volume of Blenkinsopp’s commentary on Isaiah. Along with the recent works of J. D. W. Watts (Isaiah 1–33 and Isaiah 34–66 [WBC 24 and 25; Waco, Tex.: Word Books, 1985 and 1987]), J. M. Oswalt (The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 1–39 and Chapters 40–66 [NICOT; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1986 and 1998]) and B. S. Childs (Isaiah [OTL; Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox, 2001]), it marks a welcome return to the practice of commenting on the whole of the book, rather than, as became almost the invariable rule during the bulk of the twentieth century, of dividing the book between two or even three different commentators, following the broadly accepted historical-critical divisions of the book. As would be expected, Blenkinsopp’s general approach remains unchanged through the three volumes. Unlike some contributors to the Anchor Hebrew Studies 45 (2004) 329 Reviews Bible, he does not aim at a comprehensive discussion nor at length as a selfevident virtue. Rather, he focuses primarily on what might be called a detailed introduction to the book as a whole and in all its parts, with only brief and necessary textual notes and a running exposition of each paragraph which may not attend to every aspect and detail. Nevertheless, even within this uniformity, the tendency to greater detail as he has progressed is evident, and it surely cannot be wholly ascribed to the requirements of the material under discussion. In the first volume, the commentary proper (i.e., excluding introduction, bibliography, and so on) on the first thirty-nine chapters of the book averaged just over eight printed pages per chapter; in the second volume, the sixteen chapters of Deutero-Isaiah (40–55) received an average of twelve and a quarter pages each, and in the present volume this has risen again to about seventeen pages. It is noteworthy both that the textual notes are slightly fuller and in particular that, though the running style of general comment is retained, the format approximates more closely to that of a verse-by-verse approach than was previously the case. This is to be welcomed. Even so, Blenkinsopp clearly knows a great deal more than he has chosen to include, as witness a comparison, for instance, of his comments here on 66:17 with his recent article on the same verse, “The One in the Middle,” in Reading from Right to Left...