Routine Duplex Scanning Research Articles

Long-term Results with the Palmaz Stent in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Purpose: Femoral stenting has demonstrated inconsistent and often disappointing long-term results. To compare our experience, we retrospectively analyzed a series of patients who had Palmaz balloon-expandable stents placed exclusively for superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. Methods: From January 1990 to November 1993, 39 patients were evaluated for claudication (79%) or critical ischemia in 42 limbs. The culprit lesions were confined to the SFA: 24 (57%) occlusions and 18 (43%) stenoses, including 3 restenotic lesions. Stenting was elective in 12 (29%) cases: the 3 restenoses and 9 chronic, calcified occlusions. The remaining stents were applied for postangioplasty residual stenosis or angioscopic findings of thrombogenic luminal irregularities. A total of 55 prostheses were successfully implanted. All patients were maintained on ticlopidine and followed by routine duplex scanning. Follow-up angiography was performed in 28 (72%) patients between 4 and 45 months. Results: In the postprocedural period, two acute thromboses (4.8%) occurred within 48 hours in patients who had long occlusions and poor runoff; no other major complications were encountered, for a clinical success rate of 95%. Follow-up evaluation ranged from 4 months to 4 years with a mean of 25 months. The restenosis rate was 19% (34% in occlusions; 10% in stenotic lesions, p = NS). At 24 months, cumulative primary patency was 77% and secondary patency 89%. Conclusions: Palmaz stents performed well in the SFA, demonstrating a low acute thrombosis rate and good long-term patency. The incidence of restenosis is likely to be greater in occlusions than in stenoses.

Long-term results with the Palmaz stent in the superficial femoral artery.

Femoral stenting has demonstrated inconsistent and often disappointing long-term results. To compare out experience, we retrospectively analyzed a series of patients who had Palmaz balloon-expandable stents placed exclusively for superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. From January 1990 to November 1993, 39 patients were evaluated for claudication (79%) or critical ischemia in 42 limbs. The culprit lesions were confined to the SFA: 24 (57%) occlusions and 18 (43%) stenoses, including 3 restenotic lesions. Stenting was elective in 12 (29%) cases: the 3 restenoses and 9 chronic, calcified occlusions. The remaining stents were applied for postangioplasty residual stenosis or angioscopic findings of thrombogenic luminal irregularities. A total of 55 prostheses were successfully implanted. All patients were maintained on ticlopidine and followed by routine duplex scanning. Follow-up angiography was performed in 28 (72%) patients between 4 and 45 months. In the postprocedural period, two acute thromboses (4.8%) occurred within 48 hours in patients who had long occlusions and poor runoff; no other major complications were encountered, for a clinical success rate of 95%. Follow-up evaluation ranged from 4 months to 4 years with a mean of 25 months. The restenosis rate was 19% (34% in occlusions; 10% in stenotic lesions, p = NS). At 24 months, cumulative primary patency was 77% and secondary patency 89%. Palmaz stents performed will in the SFA, demonstrating a low acute thrombosis rate and good long-term patency. The incidence of restenosis is likely to be greater in occlusions than in stenoses.

Does color-flow imaging improve the accuracy of duplex carotid evaluation?

To determine whether color-flow imaging enhances the accuracy of noninvasive carotid evaluation, the results of carotid duplex examinations from two laboratories, one with color-flow and the other with standard duplex imaging were compared. The techniques used by both laboratories were identical. All studies were interpreted by one of the authors, using the same criteria. From October 1988 through December 1989, 307 internal carotid arteries were evaluated with both color-flow imaging and standard angiography; and 206 underwent routine duplex scanning and angiography. Perfect agreement between test and angiographic results was significantly better with color-flow (86.6%) than with conventional duplex scanning (79.6%), p = 0.034 (t test for independent samples). Significantly fewer vessels were over classified by one category with color-flow (8.5%) than with routine duplex scanning (16.5%), p = 0.006. However, no difference was found in the number underclassified by one category (4.5% vs 3.4%), p = 0.5. Although these data support the accuracy of both modalities, there appears to be a trend toward improved results with the newer method. We attribute this to more precise placement of the pulsed Doppler sample volume afforded by the color-flow image.