Routine Drainage Research Articles

Routine Drain Placement after Scrotal Hydrocelectomy: the Tradeoff Between Hematoma Formation and Surgical Site Infection

Routine Drain Placement after Scrotal Hydrocelectomy: the Tradeoff Between Hematoma Formation and Surgical Site Infection

To drain or not to drain in uro-oncological robotic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of routine drainage insertion vs. no drainage in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A literature search was conducted through April 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Eleven studies comprising 8447 RARPs and 1890 RAPNs met our inclusion criteria. Our search strategy did not identify any studies within the RARC framework. In RARP, patients without postoperative drainage had lower rate of postoperative ileus (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.74; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (Clavien 1-2, P=0.41) and high-grade (Clavien ≥3; P=0.85) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.07), pelvic hematoma (P=0.35), symptomatic lymphocele (P=0.13), fever (P=0.25), incisional hernia (P=0.31), reintervention (P=0.57), length of hospital stay (P=0.22), and readmission (P=0.74) compared with routinely drained patients. In RAPN, patients without postoperative drainage had shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference: -0.84 days, 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.63; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (P=0.94) and high-grade (P=0.31) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.49), hemorrhage (P=0.39), reintervention (P=0.69), and readmission (P=0.20) compared with routinely drained patients. In our study, patients without drainage had similar perioperative course to patients with prophylactic drain insertion after RARP and RAPN. Omission of drain insertion was associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus for RARP and a shorter hospital stay for RAPN. In the era of robotic surgery, routine drain placement is no longer indicated in unselected patients.

Drain Versus No Drain in Open Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia, Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundOpen mesh repair of incisional hernia is associated with different local complications, particularly bleeding and seroma formation. Traditionally, drains have been placed perioperatively to prevent these complications, despite the lack of scientific evidence or expert consensus. We formulated the hypothesis that the absence of drainage would reduce number of patients presenting collections or complications. The present study aimed to compare postoperative complication rates after open mesh repair for incisional hernia with or without prophylactic wound drainage.MethodsProspective randomized study using standardized surgical technique and drain placement. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of residual fluid collection with ultrasound on postoperative day 30. Other complications, subdivided into medical and surgical, were analyzed as secondary endpoints.ResultsThere were 144 patients randomized (70 with drain, 74 without drain). No difference was identified between both groups for fluid collection at 30 days (60.3% vs. 62%, p = 0.844). However, less surgical complications were identified in the drain group (21.7% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.007), with a lower wound dehiscence rate (1.5% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.041).ConclusionsProphylactic drainage in open incisional hernia repair does not objectively reduce the rate of postoperative fluid collections. Therefore, our results do not support the use of routine drainage in incisional hernia repair.Trial registrationTrial registration on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00478348).

Prophylactic Drain Versus No Drain in Curative Gastric Cancer Surgery—A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has questioned the placement of prophylactic drain after curative gastrectomy. A 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis did not find convincing evidence of routine drain placement in gastrectomy, but the quality of evidence was questioned. The present study compared short-term outcomes of prophylactic drain placement versus no drain in gastrectomy. MethodologyThe study is a prospective, non-inferiority, and randomized controlled trial. Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach undergoing curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was included in the study. Randomization was done intra-operatively. The primary outcome was a postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the return of bowel function, achieving adequate enteral feeding, re-surgery, morbidity, and mortality. ResultsOne hundred fifty-seven patients were registered, of which 108 patients underwent curative surgery, and were randomized to 54 patients in each group. The median age was 55 years (range: 23–78) and 58.5 years (range: 35–80) in the drain and no drain group. No significant difference was noticed in primary or secondary outcomes in both groups. ConclusionAvoid placing a prophylactic drain is not inferior to drain placement following gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for stomach adenocarcinoma. So, routine prophylactic drain placement can be avoided.

Prophylactic abdominal drainage or no drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): a study protocol of a binational multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundProphylactic abdominal drainage is current standard practice after distal pancreatectomy (DP), with the aim to divert pancreatic fluid in case of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) aimed to prevent further complications as bleeding. Whereas POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy, by definition, involves infection due to anastomotic dehiscence, a POPF after DP is essentially sterile since the bowel is not opened and no anastomoses are created. Routine drainage after DP could potentially be omitted and this could even be beneficial because of the hypothetical prevention of drain-induced infections (Fisher, 2018). Abdominal drainage, moreover, should only be performed if it provides additional safety or comfort to the patient. In clinical practice, drains cause clear discomfort. One multicenter randomized controlled trial confirmed the safety of omitting abdominal drainage but did not stratify patients according to their risk of POPF and did not describe a standardized strategy for pancreatic transection. Therefore, a large pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial is required, with prespecified POPF risk groups and a homogeneous method of stump closure.The objective of the PANDORINA trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of omitting routine intra-abdominal drainage after DP on postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3), and, secondarily, POPF grade B/C.Methods/designBinational multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, stratifying patients to high and low risk for POPF grade B/C and incorporating a standardized strategy for pancreatic transection. Two groups of 141 patients (282 in total) undergoing elective DP (either open or minimally invasive, with or without splenectomy). Primary outcome is postoperative rate of morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3), and the most relevant secondary outcome is grade B/C POPF. Other secondary outcomes include surgical reintervention, percutaneous catheter drainage, endoscopic catheter drainage, abdominal collections (not requiring drainage), wound infection, delayed gastric emptying, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage as defined by the international study group for pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) (Wente et al., 2007), length of stay (LOS), readmission within 90 days, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.DiscussionPANDORINA is the first binational, multicenter, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with the primary objective to evaluate the hypothesis that omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after DP does not worsen the risk of postoperative severe complications (Wente et al., 2007; Bassi et al., 2017). Most of the published studies on drain placement after pancreatectomy focus on both pancreatoduodenectomy and DP, but these two entities present are associated with different complications and therefore deserve separate evaluation (McMillan et al., 2016; Pratt et al., 2006). The PANDORINA trial is innovative since it takes the preoperative risk on POPF into account based on the D-FRS and it warrants homogenous stump closing by using the same graded compression technique and same stapling device (de Pastena et al., 2022; Asbun and Stauffer, 2011).

The Karydakis flap: How I do it

IntroductionPilonidal sinus disease is a chronic inflammatory condition typically found in the sacrococcygeal region. It is caused by loose hair penetrating natal cleft skin. Treatment of symptomatic disease is surgical. There is a lack of consensus on the ideal surgical technique. MethodsThe Karydakis flap involves asymmetric excision of the disease and closing the wound off midline with a lipocutaneous flap to flatten the natal cleft. The procedure has evolved since its description in 1968 and currently entails two layered fat closure, thin flap, displacement of the caudal apex, avoidance of routine drainage and the use of absorbable skin sutures. Its design and execution remain straight forward with a short learning curve. ResultsOut of 1029 type 4 Karydakis flaps reviewed, 16% were complicated by wound dehiscence. Recurrence rate at a mean of 29 months follow-up was 1%. DiscussionBy achieving a scar which is totally away from the midline, the Karydakis flap achieves a low recurrence rate. Minimizing early superficial dehiscence of the caudal wound remains a surgical challenge. The flap is suitable for all types of pilonidal disease.

Laparoscopic liver resection can be performed safely without intraoperative drain placement.

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become a standardized procedure with advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management in the last decade; however, the necessity of routine drain placement in LLR has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the need for intraoperative drain placement (IDP) in LLR. A total of 607 patients who underwent LLR for liver tumor at our institution between January 2015 and August 2021 were studied. Clinicopathological data, including intraoperative factors and postoperative outcomes, were compared between patients with and without IDP before and after propensity score matching. Variables shown to be different between the two groups were used for matching. Then, risk analysis for additional drainage procedure after surgery was performed in the original and matched cohorts. Of the 607 patients, 4 (0.7%) and 14 (2.3%) developed incisional and organ/space surgical site infections, respectively, and 9 (1.5%) required additional drainage procedure after surgery. Ninety-three patients (15.3%) underwent IDP. The incidence and severity of postoperative complications were similar between patients with and without IDP in both the original and matched cohorts. In the matched cohort, simultaneous colectomy (odds ratio, 14.051, 95% confidence interval, 1.103-178.987; P = 0.042), rather than IDP (odds ratio, 1.836, 95% confidence interval, 0.157-21.509; P = 0.629), was independently associated with the risk of additional drainage procedure after surgery. This study demonstrated that LLR could be performed safely without IDP.

104: PERIOPERATIVE STRATEGIES IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER RESECTION IN 12 NORDIC UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS

Abstract Background and aim The Nordic countries have similar health care systems and registries simplifying epidemiological research. Differences in treatment traditions can, however, hamper the possibility to assess results and to harmonize control arms in joint randomized trials. In the process to set up a Nordic multi-center randomized trial regarding use of nasogastric tube (NG-tube) decompression after esophagectomy, we aimed to investigate perioperative routines in 12 University Hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. Methods All Nordic University Hospitals were contacted regarding a Nordic randomized controlled trial exploring effects and complications associated with the use of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy for cancer. Those who chose to join the trial were sent a questionnaire regarding surgical and perioperative routines. Results Twelve centers with a combined catchment area of 16 million inhabitants and an annual volume of 400 esophagectomies joined the trial network. All but one used totally minimally invasive or hybrid surgical approach. All 12 centers reported routine use of NG-tube and 5 employed continuous suction. The NG-tube was removed between 3 and 7 days postoperatively. A routine pylorus drainage procedure was reported from two centers. Jejunostomy was used universally in 5 centers and selectively in 6 centers. One center did not use jejunostomy. Conclusion Differences in perioperative care after esophagectomy is apparent in the Nordic countries, highlighting the need for high-level evidence regarding these practices. A unified approach may facilitate clinical trial initiatives. There is a paucity of evidence regarding optimal NG-tube use after esophagectomy for cancer and a randomized trial investigating this issue is under way.

31: UTILITY OF ABDOMINAL DRAIN IN GASTRECTOMY (ADIGE) TRIAL: STUDY PROTOCOL FOR A MULTICENTER NON-INFERIORITY RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Abstract Background and aim Prophylactic use of abdominal drain in gastrectomy has been questioned in the last 15 years and a 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis on four RCTs concluded that there was no convincing evidence to the routine drain placement in gastrectomy. Nevertheless, the Authors evidenced the moderate/low quality of the included studies and highlighted how 3 out of 4 came from Eastern countries. After 2015 only retrospective studies have been published, all with inconsistent results. Methods ADiGe (Abdominal Drin in GastrEctomy) Trial is a multicenter prospective randomized non-inferiority trial with a parallel design. It aimed to verify whether avoiding routine use of abdominal drain is burdened with complications, particularly an increase in postoperative invasive procedures. Patients with gastric cancer, scheduled for subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent, are eligible for inclusion, irrespective of previous oncological treatment. The primary composite endpoint is reoperation or percutaneous drainage procedures within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis will verify whether the incidence of the primary composite endpoint is higher in the experimental arm, avoiding routine drain placement, than control arm, undergoing prophylactic drain placement, in order to falsify or support the null hypothesis of inferiority. Secondary endpoints assessed for superiority are overall morbidity and mortality, Comprehensive Complications Index, incidence and time for diagnosis of anastomotic and duodenal leaks, length of hospital stay, readmission rate. Trial registration Prospectively registered (last updated on October 29, 2020) at Clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT04227951, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04227951. Results Assuming one-sided alpha of 5%, and cumulative incidence of the primary composite endpoint of 6.4% in control arm and 4.2% in the experimental one, 364 patients allow to achieve 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin difference between the arm proportions of 3.6%. Considering a 10% drop-out rate, 404 patients are needed. In order to have a balanced percentage between total and subtotal gastrectomy, recruitment will end at 202 patients for each type of gastrectomy. The surgeon and the patient are blinded until the end of the operation, while postoperative course is not blinded to patient and caregivers. Conclusion ADiGe Trial could contribute to critically re-evaluate the role of prophylactic drain in gastrectomy, a still widely used procedure.

Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.

Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.

Remote drain inspection framework using the convolutional neural network and re-configurable robot Raptor

Drain blockage is a crucial problem in the urban environment. It heavily affects the ecosystem and human health. Hence, routine drain inspection is essential for urban environment. Manual drain inspection is a tedious task and prone to accidents and water-borne diseases. This work presents a drain inspection framework using convolutional neural network (CNN) based object detection algorithm and in house developed reconfigurable teleoperated robot called ‘Raptor’. The CNN based object detection model was trained using a transfer learning scheme with our custom drain-blocking objects data-set. The efficiency of the trained CNN algorithm and drain inspection robot Raptor was evaluated through various real-time drain inspection field trial. The experimental results indicate that our trained object detection algorithm has detect and classified the drain blocking objects with 91.42% accuracy for both offline and online test images and is able to process 18 frames per second (FPS). Further, the maneuverability of the robot was evaluated from various open and closed drain environment. The field trial results ensure that the robot maneuverability was stable, and its mapping and localization is also accurate in a complex drain environment.

Stroke, spinal cord ischemia and upper limb ischemia in patients undergoing TEVAR with coverage of the left subclavian artery: a case series study

BackgroundWe performed routine spinal fluid drainage for patients who underwent TEVAR for thoracic aortic pathology together with left subclavian artery coverage, which was needed for achievement of a safe proximal sealing zone. We assessed the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia as well the rate of occurrence of other complications such as stroke, and upper limb ischemia.ResultsThis was a case series study done between July 2014 and April 2020, in them all the left subclavian artery was covered to ensure a proximal safe seal zone. Routine spinal fluid drainage was done, keeping the spinal fluid pressure < 10–15 mmHg with catheter in place for 48 h. Data was obtained from twenty-three patients who underwent TEVAR for thoracic aortic dissection (73.91%), thoracic aortic aneurysm (21.74%), or ulcer (4.35%). Planning was based upon multi-slice computed tomographic angiography and covering the left subclavian was mandatory to achieve a proximal sealing zone. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. 4.35% of patients had three endograft, 56.52% had two endografts, 39.13% had one endograft. All patients lost their radial pulsations immediately after implantation, 8.70% developed post implantation syndrome(fever) that was managed conservatively, 4.35% developed stroke related to the anterior circulation, 4.35% developed signs of spinal cord ischemia. During the follow up, one patient died within 6 h after the procedure due to extensive myocardial infarction (patient was scheduled for CABG after our procedure). 17.40% developed upper limb symptoms that were tolerable and were managed conservatively.ConclusionBy adopting routine spinal cord drainage and pressure monitoring, we can consider not to revascularize the left subclavian artery prior to TEVAR if it will be covered.

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak after Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Operative Repair.

There are limited studies regarding the impact of post-operative leak on perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) and conflicting results regarding routine drain placement in operative repair of PPUD. This study aims to identify risk factors for gastrointestinal leak after operative repair of PPUD to better guide intra-operative decisions about drain placement. We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019, identifying 175 patients who underwent operative repair of PPUD. Patients who developed a leak (17%) were compared to patients who did not. Both hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5g/dL) (P = .03) and duodenal ulcers (P < .01) were identified as significant risk factors for leak. No significant difference was found between leak and no leak groups for AAST disease severity grade, repair technique, or pre-operative use of tobacco, alcohol, or steroids. Post-operative leaks were associated with prolonged hospital stay (29days compared to 10, P < .01), increased complication rates (77% compared to 48%, P < .01), and increased re-operation rates (73% compared to 26%, <0.01). No difference was identified in patient characteristics or operative leak rates between patients who had drains placed at the index operation and those that did not. Leak after operative PPUD repair is associated with significant post-operative morbidity. Hypoalbuminemia and duodenal perforations are significant risk factors for post-operative leaks.

The quest to lower spinal cord injuries continues

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) has been considered one of the most important measures to reduce the risk of spinal cord injuries (SCIs) during open and endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).1-4 Although there is no level I evidence for using prophylactic CSFD during thoracic (TEVAR) or fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR), this practice has been widely adopted based on the results of a small prospective randomized study of 145 patients treated for Extent I-II TAAAs with open repair, which showed a reduction in the risk of SCI from 13% to 3% with routine drainage.

Guidelines for the performance of minimally invasive splenectomy.

Minimally invasive splenectomy (MIS) is increasingly favored for the treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the spleen over open access approaches. While many studies cite the superiority of MIS in terms of decreased morbidity and length of stay over a traditional open approach, the comparative effectiveness of specific technical and peri-operative approaches to MIS is unclear. To develop evidence-based guidelines that support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions on the peri-operative performance of MIS. A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) including methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to grade the certainty of evidence and formulate recommendations. Informed by a systematic review of the evidence, the panel agreed on eight recommendations for the peri-operative performance of MIS for adults and children in elective situations addressing six key questions. Conditional recommendations were made in favor of lateral positioning for non-hematologic disease, intra-operative platelet administration for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura instead of preoperative administration, and the use of mechanical devices to control the splenic hilum. Further, a conditional recommendation was made against routine intra-operative drain placement.

Predictors for Prolonged Drain Use Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Surgical drains are routinely used following autologous reconstruction, but are often cited as the leading cause of peri-operative discomfort. This study defined routine drain use duration and assessed the risk factors for prolonged breast and abdominal drain use during microvascular breast reconstruction, measures which have never previously been defined. Patients who underwent an abdominal microvascular free flap were included. Demographics, comorbidities, and operation-related characteristics were retrospectively collected in a prospectively maintained database. Statistical analysis utilized chi-square independent t-test, and linear regression analyses. One hundred forty-nine patients comprising 233 breast flaps were included. Average breast and abdominal drain duration were 12.9 ± 3.9 and 17.7 ± 8.2 days, respectively. Prolonged breast and abdominal drain duration were defined as drain use beyond the 75th percentile at 14 and 19 days, respectively. Multivariable regression revealed hypertension was associated with an increased breast drain duration by 1.4 days (p = 0.024), axillary dissection with 1.7 days (p = 0.026), African-American race with 3.1 days (p < 0.001), Hispanic race with 1.6 days (p = 0.029), return to the OR with 3.2 days (p = 0.004), and each point increase in BMI with 0.1 days (p = 0.028). For abdominal drains, each point increase in BMI was associated with an increased abdominal drain duration by 0.3 days (p = 0.011), infection with 14.4 days (p < 0.001), and return to the OR with 5.7 days (p = 0.007). Elevated BMI, hypertension, and axillary dissection increase risk for prolonged breast drain requirement in autologous reconstruction. African-American and Hispanic populations experience prolonged breast drain requirement after controlling for other factors, warranting further study.

Liver Abscess: Complications and Treatment.

Liver Abscess: Complications and Treatment.

Early Drain Removal is Safe in Patients With Low or Intermediate Risk of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

This multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to test the hypothesis that early drain removal (EDR) could decrease the incidence of grade 2 to 4 complications for patients undoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with low or intermediate risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The safety and effects of EDR on postoperative complications after PD are still controversial. A multicenter randomized controlled trial at 6 tertiary referral hospitals was carried out (NCT03055676). Patients who met the inclusion criteria, including drain amylase level less than 5000 U/L on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3, and drain output less than 300 mL per day within 3 days after surgery, were enrolled. Patients were then randomized to the EDR group or the routine drain removal (RDR) group. In the EDR group, all drainage tubes were removed on POD3. In the RDR group, drainage tubes were removed on POD 5 or beyond. Primary outcome was the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 to 4 complications. Secondary outcomes were comprehensive complication index, grade B/C POPF, total medical expenses and postoperative in-hospital stay etc, within 90 days after surgery. A total of 692 patients were screened, and 312 patients were eligible for randomization. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups and 96.8% of these 312 patients had low or intermediate risk of POPF, according to the 10-point fistula risk score. A total of 20.5% of the patients in the EDR group suffered at least 1 grade 2 to 4 complication, versus 26.3% in the RDR group (P = 0.229). Multi-variate analysis showed older age (>65 years old) and blood transfusion were independent risk factors for grade 2 to 4 complications. The rate of grade B/C POPF was low in either group (3.8% vs 6.4%, P = 0.305). The comprehensive complication index of the 2 groups was also comparable (20.9 vs 20.9, P = 0.253). Total medical expenses were not significantly different. Postoperative in-hospital stay was clinically similar (15 days vs 16 days, P = 0.010). Nearly half of the patients undergoing PD met the inclusion criteria, predicting low incidence of grade B/C POPF and major complications. EDR was safe in these patients but did not significantly decrease major complications.

Infection prevention plan to decrease surgical site infections in bariatric surgery patients.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications of bariatric surgery. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (QI) Program (MBSAQIP) allows accredited programs to develop processes for quality improvement based on data collection. The objective of this study was to decrease SSI rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery at an accredited MBSAQIP center. Using the MBSAQIP semiannual report, SSI rates were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline SSI rates were collected from 01/01/2014-12/31/2015. On 01/01/2016, the first infection prevention protocol (IPP-1) was created that included 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) showers, CHG wipes immediately prior to surgery, and routine cultures of SSIs. An updated IPP (IPP-2) was implemented on 09/01/2016, which discontinued routine surgical drain placement and broadened antibiotic coverage for penicillin allergic patients. During baseline data collection, SSI rates were 5.1%. After the implementation of IPP-1, SSI rates trended down to 2.5%. After implementation of IPP-2, SSI rates decreased significantly to 1.5%, a 66% relative risk reduction in SSIs from baseline. On multivariate regression analysis, the perioperative factors associated with an increased risk for SSIs included diabetes mellitus, intraoperative surgical drain placement, the number of hypertension medications prior to bariatric surgery, and an open approach. Our study demonstrates that the implementation of a specific protocol for reducing SSIs is safe and feasible in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We also identified that the success of the IPP is likely centered on the elimination of routine drain placement during primary bariatric procedures.

Genomic surveillance, characterization and intervention of a polymicrobial multidrug-resistant outbreak in critical care

Background. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) have become increasingly prevalent in clinical settings and often result in significant morbidity and mortality due to their multidrug resistance (MDR). Here we present an integrated whole-genome sequencing (WGS) response to a persistent CR-Ab outbreak in a Brisbane hospital between 2016–2018. Methods. A. baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sequenced using the Illumina platform primarily to establish isolate relationships based on core-genome SNPs, MLST and antimicrobial resistance gene profiles. Representative isolates were selected for PacBio sequencing. Environmental metagenomic sequencing with Illumina was used to detect persistence of the outbreak strain in the hospital. Results. In response to a suspected polymicrobial outbreak between May to August of 2016, 28 CR-Ab (and 21 other MDR Gram-negative bacilli) were collected from Intensive Care Unit and Burns Unit patients and sent for WGS with a 7 day turn-around time in clinical reporting. All CR-Ab were sequence type (ST)1050 (Pasteur ST2) and within 10 SNPs apart, indicative of an ongoing outbreak, and distinct from historical CR-Ab isolates from the same hospital. Possible transmission routes between patients were identified on the basis of CR-Ab and K. pneumoniae SNP profiles. Continued WGS surveillance between 2016 to 2018 enabled suspected outbreak cases to be refuted, but a resurgence of the outbreak CR-Ab mid-2018 in the Burns Unit prompted additional screening. Environmental metagenomic sequencing identified the hospital plumbing as a potential source. Replacement of the plumbing and routine drain maintenance resulted in rapid resolution of the secondary outbreak and significant risk reduction with no discernable transmission in the Burns Unit since. Conclusion. We implemented a comprehensive WGS and metagenomics investigation that resolved a persistent CR-Ab outbreak in a critical care setting.