Seen from its satellite lo, Jupiter would nearly fill sky, huge, looming presence that would boggle mind accustomed to much smaller disk visible on earthly nights. Yet in another sense, lo also fills sky of Jupiter, by serving as source of various atoms, ions and perhaps molecules that spread in vast, diffuse nebulae throughout much of Jovian system. Though they are probably too rarified and faint to be visible to human observer at giant planet, they have been detected by instruments in both earth-based and spacecraft studies. The most conspicuous from earth has been sodium cloud, comprised of atoms sputtered up from lo's surface and visible by reflected sunlight as faint, golden haze. First detected in spectral measurements some years ago, it was finally photographed late in 1976 (SN: 3/5/77, p. 155), and until recently was only one of lo's various emissions to have actually had its picture taken. Now there is second. It is sulfur, again known for some time from earth-based data and lately measured directly by Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft. Some may be sputtered up from lo's surface by particles crashing in along Jupiter's magnetic field line, and some may be erupted from lo's newly discovered volcanoes. (The eruption velocities, though apparently often higher than those of terrestrial volcanoes, are still less than lo's escape velocity. But once tossed free, sulfur atoms can be readily ionized by Jupiter-trapped particles, and swept away by fields.) But unlike sodium, whose reflected brightness essentially disappears when it becomes ionized, sulfur is rendered visible to some observations by ionization, although resulting emissions are perhaps thousand times fainter than sodium cloud. The Voyager instruments yielded spectra, not images, but during period between two spacecraft encounters with Jupiter, ionized sulfur was successfully photographed from earth. The images show sulfur in its singly ionized form, SI (the Voyagers also detected more highly ionized species, SI and S3+). They were made by Carl B. Pilcher of University of Hawaii, using 2.2-meter telescope at Mauna Kea Observatory and narrow-band filter tuned to 6731-angstrom forbidden emission line of S+. Pilcher took pictures on two successive evenings -April 9 and 10 of this year -and that fact is significant, for results suggest that St is highly variable phenomenon, changing markedly in short period of time. Because S+ is electrically charged, ions are trapped and held by Jupiter's magnetic field lines, which conduct them into ring-shape or torus surrounding planet. The Voyager 1 and 2 measurements, taken about four months apart, showed appreciable changes both in amount of sulfur and in proportions of different ionization levels. Pilcher's images, however, seem to indicate changes in very size and shape of torus -and over spans of 24 hours or less. The images show only partial arc of torus, so Pilcher drew in rest of ring in each view (estimating from visible portion) to indicate its shape and position. For three April 9 observations, he says, ring with radius of 5.3 times radius of Jupiter (5.3Rj) seems to give a good overall match with photos. In each view, torus seems to be tilted about 10.60 from planet's axis of rotation, which would mean, as expected, that torus was aligned with Jovian magnetic equator. However, he says, the ring had an entirely different appearance on following night. It was larger about 5.7RJ, Pilcher estimates and tilted only about 7.0?. A major part of difference, he suggests, could be matter of difference in kinetic temperature of observed ions between two nights. If ions on April 9 were suitably energetic, calculations have indicated, they would have been distributed symmetrically around Jupiter's magnetic equator. If, on other hand, they were cool and slow-moving enough on April 10, their motion might have been dominated by forces due to rotation of magnetic field in which they were trapped. This would have moved them into centrifugal symmetry surface, which would show observed 70 inclination. The first night's hotter S+ would presumably have been more recently ionized, while that from second night would have lost some of its energy from inter-particle collisions. But there was another difference. On April 9, torus was relatively thin in north-south direction, no thicker than about 0.3 RJ, while on second night its outer edge had flared out in fan (not shown) as thick as 1.1 RJ. And that raises problem in ascribing appearance of first night's torus to hotter, magnetically confined ions. If ions came from neutral sulfur atoms originating on lo, and were being created throughout Jupiter's rotation, April 9 ions should have been distributed over 200 of magnetic lati(Continued on p. 156) 0