Rosuvastatin Exposure Research Articles

THU0135 Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions of VX-509 (DECERNOTINIB), an Oral Selective Janus Kinase 3 Inhibitor, in Healthy Human Volunteers

BackgroundPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often receive multiple medications to manage the signs and symptom of comorbidities. It is therefore important to understand the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDI). VX-509...

Hepatic Basolateral Efflux Contributes Significantly to Rosuvastatin Disposition I: Characterization of Basolateral Versus Biliary Clearance Using a Novel Protocol in Sandwich-Cultured Hepatocytes

Transporters responsible for hepatic uptake and biliary clearance (CLBile) of rosuvastatin (RSV) have been well characterized. However, the contribution of basolateral efflux clearance (CLBL) to hepatic and systemic exposure of RSV is unknown. Additionally, the appropriate design of in vitro hepatocyte efflux experiments to estimate CLBile versus CLBL remains to be established. A novel uptake and efflux protocol was developed in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) to achieve desired tight junction modulation while maintaining cell viability. Subsequently, studies were conducted to determine the role of CLBL in the hepatic disposition of RSV using SCH from wild-type (WT) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2)-deficient (TR(-)) rats in the absence and presence of the P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) inhibitor elacridar (GF120918). RSV CLBile was nearly ablated by GF120918 in TR(-) SCH, confirming that Mrp2 and Bcrp are responsible for the majority of RSV CLBile. Pharmacokinetic modeling revealed that CLBL and CLBile represent alternative elimination routes with quantitatively similar contributions to the overall hepatocellular excretion of RSV in rat SCH under baseline conditions (WT SCH in the absence of GF120918) and also in human SCH. Membrane vesicle experiments revealed that RSV is a substrate of MRP4 (Km = 21 ± 7 µM, Vmax = 1140 ± 210 pmol/min per milligram of protein). Alterations in MRP4-mediated RSV CLBL due to drug-drug interactions, genetic polymorphisms, or disease states may lead to changes in hepatic and systemic exposure of RSV, with implications for the safety and efficacy of this commonly used medication.

A Mechanistic Framework for In Vitro–In Vivo Extrapolation of Liver Membrane Transporters: Prediction of Drug–Drug Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Cyclosporine

Background and ObjectivesThe interplay between liver metabolising enzymes and transporters is a complex process involving system-related parameters such as liver blood perfusion as well as drug attributes including protein and lipid binding, ionisation, relative magnitude of passive and active permeation. Metabolism- and/or transporter-mediated drug–drug interactions (mDDIs and tDDIs) add to the complexity of this interplay. Thus, gaining meaningful insight into the impact of each element on the disposition of a drug and accurately predicting drug–drug interactions becomes very challenging. To address this, an in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)-linked mechanistic physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) framework for modelling liver transporters and their interplay with liver metabolising enzymes has been developed and implemented within the Simcyp Simulator®.MethodsIn this article an IVIVE technique for liver transporters is described and a full-body PBPK model is developed. Passive and active (saturable) transport at both liver sinusoidal and canalicular membranes are accounted for and the impact of binding and ionisation processes is considered. The model also accommodates tDDIs involving inhibition of multiple transporters. Integrating prior in vitro information on the metabolism and transporter kinetics of rosuvastatin (organic-anion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1, OAT1B3 and OATP2B1, sodium-dependent taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide [NTCP] and breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP]) with one clinical dataset, the PBPK model was used to simulate the drug disposition of rosuvastatin for 11 reported studies that had not been used for development of the rosuvastatin model.ResultsThe simulated area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (C max) and the time to reach C max (t max) values of rosuvastatin over the dose range of 10–80 mg, were within 2-fold of the observed data. Subsequently, the validated model was used to investigate the impact of coadministration of cyclosporine (ciclosporin), an inhibitor of OATPs, BCRP and NTCP, on the exposure of rosuvastatin in healthy volunteers.ConclusionThe results show the utility of the model to integrate a wide range of in vitro and in vivo data and simulate the outcome of clinical studies, with implications for their design.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-013-0097-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Murine Oatp1a/1b Uptake Transporters Control Rosuvastatin Systemic Exposure Without Affecting Its Apparent Liver Exposure

Organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) mediate the liver uptake and hence plasma clearance of a broad range of drugs. For rosuvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug and OATP1A/1B substrate, the liver represents both its main therapeutic target and its primary clearance organ. Here we studied the impact of Oatp1a/1b uptake transporters on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin using wild-type and Oatp1a/1b-null mice. After oral administration (15 mg/kg), intestinal absorption of rosuvastatin was not impaired in Oatp1a/1b-null mice, but systemic exposure (area under the curve) was 8-fold higher in these mice compared with wild-type. Although liver exposure was comparable between the two mouse strains (despite the increased blood exposure), the liver-to-blood ratios were markedly decreased (>10-fold) in the absence of Oatp1a/1b transporters. After intravenous administration (5 mg/kg), systemic exposure was 3-fold higher in Oatp1a/1b-null mice than in the wild-type mice. Liver, small intestinal, and kidney exposure were slightly, but not significantly, increased in Oatp1a/1b-null mice. The biliary excretion of rosuvastatin was very fast, with 60% of the dose eliminated within 15 minutes after intravenous administration, and also not significantly altered in Oatp1a/1b-null mice. Rosuvastatin renal clearance, although still minor, was increased ∼15-fold in Oatp1a/1b-null males, suggesting a role of Oatp1a1 in the renal reabsorption of rosuvastatin. Absence of Oatp1a/1b uptake transporters increases the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin by reducing its hepatic extraction ratio. However, liver concentrations are not significantly affected, most likely due to the compensatory activity of high-capacity, low-affinity alternative uptake transporters at higher systemic rosuvastatin levels and the absence of efficient alternative rosuvastatin clearance mechanisms.

Effects of Piperine, Cinnamic Acid and Gallic Acid on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Rats

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions with natural products (such as piperine (PIP), gallic acid (GA) and cinnamic acid (CA)) and rosuvastatin (RSV) (a specific breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP substrate) in rats. In Caco2 cells, the polarized transport of RSV was effectively inhibited by PIP, CA and GA at concentration of 50 μM. After per oral (p.o.) coadministration of PIP, CA and GA (10 mg/kg) significantly increased intravenous exposure (AUC(last)) of RSV (1 mg/kg) by 73.5%, 62.9% and 53.3% (p < 0.05), respectively than alone group (control). Compared with the control (alone) group, p.o. coadministration of PIP, CA and GA (10 mg/kg) significantly increased the oral exposure (AUC(last)) of RSV (5 mg/kg) by 2.0-fold, 1.83-fold (p < 0.05) and 2.34 -fold (p < 0.05), respectively. Moreover, the cumulative biliary excretion of RSV (5 mg/kg, p.o.) was significantly decreased by 53.3, 33.4 and 39.2% at the end of 8 h after p.o. co-administration of PIP, CA and GA (10 mg/kg), respectively. Taken together, these results indicate that the natural products such as PIP, CA and GA significantly inhibit RSV transport in to bile and increased the plasma exposure (AUC(last)) of RSV.

Eltrombopag increases plasma rosuvastatin exposure in healthy volunteers

OATP1B1 is important for hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin and BCRP is important for rosuvastatin absorption and elimination. Eltrombopag inhibits OATP1B1 and BCRP in vitro at clinically relevant concentrations. Inhibition of these transporters could change cholesterol-lowering efficacy and increase the risk of exposure-dependent toxicities. To determine if co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin alters plasma rosuvastatin exposure, an open-label study was conducted in 42 healthy adult subjects. Concomitant administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin was associated with increased rosuvastatin exposure via inhibition of drug transporters. The therapeutic index of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be reduced by the concomitant use of eltrombopag. In subjects taking eltrombopag, a reduced dose of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be needed. Eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist, inhibits the organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in vitro. OATP1B1 is important for hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin and inhibition of this transporter could reduce cholesterol-lowering efficacy and increase the risk of exposure-dependent toxicities. In contrast, BCRP is an efflux transporter and inhibition of this transporter could increase both hepatic and plasma rosuvastatin concentrations, resulting in increased efficacy and toxicity. To determine if co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin alters plasma rosuvastatin exposure, an open-label study was conducted in 42 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received rosuvastatin and eltrombopag orally: day 1, rosuvastatin 10 mg single dose; days 6 to 9, eltrombopag 75 mg once daily; day 10, eltrombopag 75 mg once daily and rosuvastatin 10 mg single dose. Adverse event assessments were performed daily and at the follow-up visit. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected days 1 to 5 and days 10 to 14. Co-administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin increased geometric mean (90% confidence interval) plasma rosuvastatin AUC(0,∞) by 55% (42%, 69%) and C(max) by 103% (82%, 126%) in the overall study population, with a larger interaction in the non-Asian compared with Asian subjects. Concomitant administration of eltrombopag with rosuvastatin was associated with increased rosuvastatin exposure. The therapeutic index of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be reduced by the concomitant use of eltrombopag. In subjects taking eltrombopag, a reduced dose of HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors may be needed.

The effect of herbal medicine danshensu and ursolic acid on pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in rats

The aim of this study was to explore potential herb-drug interaction between danshensu or ursolic acid and rosuvastatin. Compared to the control group given rosuvastatin alone, the concurrent use of danshensu (46mg/kg) or ursolic acid (80mg/kg) prior to the oral administration of rosuvastatin (100mg/kg) increased the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin more than twofold. The plasma clearance of rosuvastatin was reduced to more than 57% in the presence of danshensu or ursolic acid. Rosuvastatin is minimally metabolized in the CYP2C9 isoenzyme pathway and to an even lesser extent in the CYP2C19 isoenzyme pathway. Rosuvastatin is a substrate of drug transporters such as human OATP1B1, OATP 1B3, OATP 1A2, BCRP and NTCP. Therefore, the present results suggested that the potential drug interaction between danshensu or ursolic acid and rosuvastatin may be mediated by one or more transporters (OATP1B1, OATP 1B3, OATP 1A2, BCRP and NTCP) and/or CYPs.

The effect of acute administration of rifampicin and imatinib on the enterohepatic transport of rosuvastatin in vivo

Hepatobiliary transporters efficiently shunt rosuvastatin from the blood stream, into the hepatocyte, followed by transporter-mediated excretion into the bile ducts.This study aimed at investigating the contribution of sinusoidal versus canalicular transport on the pharmacokinetics of an intrajejunal dose of 80 mg rosuvastatin in pigs (control group, n = 2 + 6). The transport inhibitors, rifampicin (20 mg/kg, n = 6) and imatinib (14 mg/kg, n = 6), were administered as 2-h long intravenous infusions. Plasma samples were withdrawn from the portal and hepatic vein simultaneously during 5 h along with bile sample collection.Rifampicin reduced the hepatic extraction of rosuvastatin by 35% and the area under the curve in the hepatic vein compartment increased by a factor of 6.3 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 3.1–32, P value <0.01). The increase in the portal vein compartment was less pronounced than in the hepatic vein, 2.0-fold (95% CI: 1.1–3.8, P value <0.05), suggesting that the inhibition was predominantly located in the liver rather than in the intestine and suggesting inhibition if sinusoidal transport. In contrast, no effect on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin was observed following concomitant administration with imatinib possibly due to insufficient concentration of the inhibitor inside the hepatocyte.Rifampicin significantly affected the hepatobiliary transport of rosuvastatin, however imatinib did not alter the plasma exposure of rosuvastatin.

Statin-induced myopathy in the rat: relationship between systemic exposure, muscle exposure and myopathy

Rare instances of myopathy are associated with all statins, but cerivastatin was withdrawn from clinical use due to a greater incidence of myopathy.The mechanism of statin-induced myopathy with respect to tissue disposition was investigated by measuring the systemic, hepatic, and skeletal muscle exposure of cerivastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin in rats before and after muscle damage.The development of myopathy was not associated with the accumulation of statins in skeletal muscle. For each statin exposure was equivalent in muscles irrespective of their fibre-type sensitivity to myopathy. The low amount of each statin in skeletal muscle relative to the liver does not support a significant role for transporters in the disposition of statins in skeletal muscle. Finally, the concentration of cerivastatin necessary to cause necrosis in skeletal muscle was considerably lower than rosuvastatin or simvastatin, supporting the concept cerivastatin is intrinsically more myotoxic than other statins.

Rosuvastatin protects against podocyte apoptosis in vitro

Clinical studies suggest that statins reduce proteinuria and slow the decline in kidney function in chronic kidney disease. Given a rich literature identifying podocyte apoptosis as an early step in the pathophysiological progression to proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis, we hypothesized that rosuvastatin protects podocytes from undergoing apoptosis. Regarding a potential mechanism, our lab has shown that the cell cycle protein, p21, has a prosurvial role in podocytes and there is literature showing statins upregulate p21 in other renal cells. Therefore, we queried whether rosuvastatin is prosurvival in podocytes through a p21-dependent pathway. Two independent apoptotic triggers, puromycin aminonucleoside (PA) and adriamycin (ADR), were used to induce apoptosis in p21 +/+ and p21 -/- conditionally immortalized mouse podocytes with or without pre-exposure to rosuvastatin. Apoptosis was measured by two methods: Hoechst 33342 staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). To establish a role for p21, p21 levels were measured by western blotting following rosuvastatin exposure and p21 was stably transduced into p21 -/- mouse podocytes. Rosuvastatin protects against ADR- and PA-induced apoptosis in podocytes. Further, exposure to rosuvastatin increases p21 levels in podocytes in vitro. ADR induces apoptosis in p21 -/- mouse podocytes, but rosuvastatin's protective effect is not seen in the absence of p21. Reconstituting p21 in p21 -/- podocytes restores rosuvastatin's prosurvival effect. Rosuvastatin is prosurvival in injured podocytes. Rosuvastatin exerts its protective effect through a p21-dependent antiapoptotic pathway. These findings suggest that statins decrease proteinuria by protecting against podocyte apoptosis and subsequent podocyte depopulation.

Influence of OATP1B1 Genotype on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin in Koreans

This study was carried out to determine whether polymorphisms of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) have an effect on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in Koreans. Among 200 subjects genotyped for OATP1B1 c.388A>G, and c.521T>C, 30 subjects were selected for the rosuvastatin pharmacokinetic study. The area under the concentration-time curve for 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of rosuvastatin for group 1 (*1a/*1a, *1a/*1b, *1b/*1b), group 2 (*1a/*15, *1b/*15), and group 3 (*15/*15) were 111+/-49.3, 126+/-45.2, and 191+/-31.0 ng h/ml, respectively, with significant differences among the three groups (P=0.0429) and between *15/*15 and the other groups (P=0.0181). The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) also showed a significant difference between *15/*15 and the other groups (P=0.0181). There were no significant differences in rosuvastatin-lactone pharmacokinetics among the three groups. The pharmacokinetic exposure of rosuvastatin was higher in the OATP1B1*15/*15 subjects than the others, suggesting a potential association between the OATP1B1 genetic polymorphisms and altered rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in Korean populations.