Rosuvastatin Exposure Research Articles

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict potential drug-drug interactions of dersimelagon (MT-7117).

Dersimelagon is a novel, investigational, orally administered, selective agonist of the melanocortin-1 receptor that has demonstrated efficacy at increasing symptom-free light exposure and an acceptable safety profile in patients with protoporphyria. A phase 1 drug-drug interaction (DDI) study demonstrated that dersimelagon 300 mg has the potential for clinically relevant DDIs with drugs that are substrates for breast cancer resistance protein, such as atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. This study uses physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to further investigate the DDI effects at lower doses of dersimelagon with substrate drugs. The data from in silico, in vitro and in vivo studies were used to construct a PBPK model for dersimelagon to assess the DDI potential between dersimelagon and substrate drugs for cytochrome P450 3A, P-glycoprotein, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/1B3, organic anion transporter 3 and breast cancer resistance protein, including atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The systemic exposure of atorvastatin based on the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve was predicted to increase 1.21-fold and 1.25-fold, respectively, if coadministered with dersimelagon 100 mg, and 1.42-fold and 1.45-fold with dersimelagon 200 mg. The systemic exposure of rosuvastatin followed trends similar to atorvastatin (1.67-fold and 1.34-fold increase in maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve, respectively, with dersimelagon 100 mg, and 2.40-fold and 1.69-fold with dersimelagon 200 mg). Overall, PBPK modelling results indicate that the simulated changes in plasma exposure of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin following coadministration with dersimelagon 100 or 200 mg are not clinically significant, but caution and appropriate clinical monitoring should be recommended.

Coproporphyrin-I as a Selective OATP1B Biomarker Can Be Used to Delineate the Mechanisms of Complex Drug-Drug Interactions: Cedirogant Case Study.

Cedirogant is an inverse agonist of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma thymus developed for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Cedirogant induces cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 while inhibiting P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, and OATP1B3 in vitro. Static drug-drug interactions (DDIs) predictions suggested possible clinical induction of CYP3A4, and inhibition of P-gp, BCRP, and OATP1B1, leading to challenges in interpreting DDI studies between cedirogant and substrates of CYP3A, P-gp, BCRP, and OATP1B1/3. Here the effects of cedirogant on the pharmacokinetics of two statin drugs were investigated in healthy participants. Coproporphyrin-I (CP-I), a selective endogenous OATP1B biomarker, was used to assess the impact of cedirogant on OATP1B. Cedirogant (375 mg once daily) increased rosuvastatin maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUCtau) by 141% and 55%, respectively when co-administered, whereas atorvastatin Cmax increased by 40% with no effect on its AUCtau compared with administration of rosuvastatin/atorvastatin alone. Cedirogant did not increase CP-I exposures, indicating no clinical OATP1B inhibition. The increased rosuvastatin exposure and minimal change in atorvastatin exposure with co-administration of cedirogant is attributed to BCRP inhibition and interplay between P-gp/BCRP inhibition and CYP3A induction, respectively. Correlation analysis with data from two investigational drugs (glecaprevir and flubentylosin) demonstrated that OATP1B1 R-value of > 1.5 and [Cmax,u]/[OATP1B1 IC50] of > 0.1 are associated with > 1.25-fold increase in CP-I Cmax ratio. This demonstrates the utility of CP-I in disentangling mechanisms underlying a complex DDI involving multiple transporters and enzymes and proposes refined criteria for static OATP1B inhibition predictions.

Influence of a Short Course of Ritonavir Used as Booster in Antiviral Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 on the Exposure of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin.

Early antiviral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is recommended for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk for severe courses. Such patients are usually chronically ill and susceptible to adverse drug interactions caused by ritonavir. We investigated the interactions of short-term low-dose ritonavir therapy with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, two statins commonly used in this population. We assessed exposure changes (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax)) of a single dose of 10 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg rosuvastatin before and on the fifth day of ritonavir treatment (2 × 100 mg/day) in healthy volunteers and developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to estimate dose adjustment of atorvastatin during ritonavir treatment. By the fifth day of ritonavir treatment, the AUC∞ of atorvastatin increased 4.76-fold and Cmax 3.78-fold, and concurrently, the concentration of atorvastatin metabolites decreased to values below the lower limit of quantification. Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated that a stepwise reduction in atorvastatin dose during ritonavir treatment with a stepwise increase up to 4 days after ritonavir discontinuation can keep atorvastatin exposure within safe and effective margins. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics were only mildly modified; ritonavir significantly increased the Cmax 1.94-fold, while AUC∞ was unchanged. Atorvastatin doses should likely be adjusted during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. For patients on a 20-mg dose, we recommend half of the original dose. In patients taking 40 mg or more, a quarter of the dose should be taken until 2 days after discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients receiving rosuvastatin do not need to change their treatment regimen. EudraCT number: 2021-006634-39. DRKS00027838.

The Effect of BI 730357 (Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor Gamma t Antagonist, Bevurogant) on the Pharmacokinetics of a Transporter Probe Cocktail, Including Digoxin, Furosemide, Metformin, and Rosuvastatin: An Open-Label, Non-randomized, 2-Period Fixed-Sequence Trial in Healthy Subjects.

Evaluating Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) for new investigational compounds requires several trials evaluating different drugs with different transporter specificities. By using a cocktail of drugs with different transporter specificities, a single trial could evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of each cocktail drug simultaneously, reducing the number of clinical DDI trials required for clinical development. We aimed to investigate the effect of steady-state Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) 730357 (bevurogant) on the PKs of a validated and optimized 4-component transporter cocktail. This open-label, non-randomized, 2-period fixed-sequence phase I trial compared transporter cocktail (0.25mg digoxin/1mg furosemide/10mg metformin hydrochloride/10mg rosuvastatin) with and without BI 730357 in healthy subjects aged 18-55 years with body mass index 18.5-29.9kg/m2 . During reference treatment/period 1, transporter cocktail was administered 90 minutes after breakfast. After a washout period, during test treatment/period 2, BI 730357 was dosed twice daily for 13 days, with transporter cocktail administered on day 1. The primary endpoints were the area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and the maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma (Cmax ), and the secondary endpoint was the area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz ). Steady-state BI 730357 increased digoxin (+48% to +94%), minimally affected metformin (-2% to -9%), furosemide (+12% to +18%), and rosuvastatin (+19% to +39%) exposure. Therefore, no clinically relevant inhibition of transporters OCT2/MATE-1/MATE-2K, OAT1/OAT3, OATP1B1/OATP1B3 was observed. Potential inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein noted as PK parameters of coproporphyrin I/III (OATP1B1/OATP1B3 biomarkers) remained within bioequivalence boundaries while rosuvastatin PK parameters (AUC0-∞ /Cmax /AUC0-tz ) exceeded the bioequivalence boundary. BI 730357 was safe and well tolerated. This trial confirms the usefulness and tolerability of the transporter cocktail consisting of digoxin, furosemide, metformin, and rosuvastatin in assessing drug-transporter interactions in vivo.

Inhibition of efflux transporters by poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors.

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of various cancers. They share a similar mechanism of action but have differences in pharmacokinetic characteristics and potential for drug-drug interactions (DDI). This study evaluated the potential ATP-binding cassette transporter-mediated interactions between PARP inhibitors (niraparib, olaparib and rucaparib) and statins (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin). We studied the inhibitory activity of PARP inhibitors on breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 (MRP3) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) using vesicular transport assays and determined the concentrations required for 50% inhibition (IC50 ). Then, we predicted the increase of statin exposure followed by the administration of PARP inhibitors using a mechanistic static model. Rucaparib was the strongest inhibitor of BCRP-mediated rosuvastatin transport (IC50 13.7 μM), followed by niraparib (42.6 μM) and olaparib (216 μM). PARP inhibitors did not affect MRP3. While niraparib appeared to inhibit P-gp, the inhibition showed large variability. The inhibition of intestinal BCRP by rucaparib, niraparib and olaparib was predicted to elevate rosuvastatin exposure by 52%, 37% and 24%, respectively. The interactions between PARP inhibitors and rosuvastatin are probably of minor clinical significance alone, but combined with other predisposing factors, they may increase the risk of rosuvastatin-associated adverse effects.

Evaluation of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation risk using real-world data, in vitro cardiomyocyte studies, and mortality assessment

Drug-induced QT prolongation is attributed to several mechanisms, including hERG channel blockage. However, the risks, mechanisms, and the effects of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation remain unclear. Therefore, this study assessed the risk of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation using (1) real-world data with two different settings, namely case–control and retrospective cohort study designs; (2) laboratory experiments using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM); (3) nationwide claim data for mortality risk evaluation. Real-world data showed an association between QT prolongation and the use of rosuvastatin (OR [95% CI], 1.30 [1.21–1.39]) but not for atorvastatin (OR [95% CI], 0.98 [0.89–1.07]). Rosuvastatin also affected the sodium and calcium channel activities of cardiomyocytes in vitro. However, rosuvastatin exposure was not associated with a high risk of all-cause mortality (HR [95% CI], 0.95 [0.89–1.01]). Overall, these results suggest that rosuvastatin use increased the risk of QT prolongation in real-world settings, significantly affecting the action potential of hiPSC-CMs in laboratory settings. Long-term rosuvastatin treatment was not associated with mortality. In conclusion, while our study links rosuvastatin use to potential QT prolongation and possible influence on the action potential of hiPSC-CMs, long-term use does not show increased mortality, necessitating further research for conclusive real-world applications.

Two curcumin analogs inhibited the function and protein expression of breast cancer resistance protein: in vitro and in vivo studies

1. Two curcumin analogs, (1E,6E)-1,7-bis(3,5-diethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5- dione (N17) and its prodrug ((1E,6E)-3,5-dioxohepta-1,6-diene-1,7-diyl)bis(2,6-diethyl-4,1- phenylene)bis(3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropanoate) (N17′), were evaluated as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors. 2. MDCKII-BCRP and MDCKII-WT were used to evaluate the modulation effects of N17 and N17′ on BCRP and to explore the relevant mechanism. Sprague-Dawley rats were orally administered rosuvastatin (ROS), a probe substrate of BCRP, without and with N17′ (100 mg/kg) to investigate the effect of N17′ on ROS pharmacokinetics. 3. In cell studies, N17 and N17′ were substrates of BCRP, and they decreased the activity and protein expression of BCRP. In rat study, N17′ increased the systemic exposure of ROS by 218% (p = 0.058). 4. N17 and N17′ are potential BCRP inhibitors and will be promising candidates for overcoming the BCRP-mediated multidrug resistance.

Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug-drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3.

Previous use of a mechanistic static model to accurately quantify the increased rosuvastatin exposure due to drug-drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered atazanavir underpredicted the magnitude of area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) based on inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. To reconcile the disconnect between predicted and clinical AUCR, atazanavir and other protease inhibitors (darunavir, lopinavir and ritonavir) were evaluated as inhibitors of BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) and organic anion transporter (OAT) 3. None of the drugs inhibited OAT3, nor did darunavir and ritonavir inhibit OATP1B3 or NTCP. All drugs inhibited BCRP-mediated estrone 3-sulfate transport or OATP1B1-mediated estradiol 17β-D-glucuronide transport with the same rank order of inhibitory potency (lopinavir>ritonavir>atazanavir>>darunavir) and mean IC50 values ranging from 15.5 ± 2.80 μM to 143 ± 14.7 μM or 0.220 ± 0.0655 μM to 9.53 ± 2.50 μM, respectively. Atazanavir and lopinavir also inhibited OATP1B3- or NTCP-mediated transport with a mean IC50 of 1.86 ± 0.500 μM or 65.6 ± 10.7 μM and 5.04 ± 0.0950 μM or 20.3 ± 2.13 μM, respectively. Following integration of a combined hepatic transport component into the previous mechanistic static model using the in vitro inhibitory kinetic parameters determined above for atazanavir, the newly predicted rosuvastatin AUCR reconciled with the clinically observed AUCR confirming additional minor involvement of OATP1B3 and NTCP inhibition in its DDI. The predictions for the other protease inhibitors confirmed inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 as the principal pathways involved in their clinical DDI with rosuvastatin.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Rosuvastatin Following Single-dose Administration in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasted and Fed Conditions.

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two rosuvastatin calcium tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasted and fed conditions. The study was carried out using a randomized, open-label, two-formulation, two-sequence, two-period, single-dose crossover design, with a washout period of 7days. Both the fasted study and fed study enrolled 28 subjects. In each study period, the subjects were administrated a single oral dose of the test product or reference product of rosuvastatin 10mg. Blood samples were collected from pre-dose to 72hours after administration with 16 time points in total. Bioequivalence evaluation was performed using ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters of rosuvastatin, including Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ . In the present study, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of test/reference geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ under the fasted and fed conditions were all within the acceptance range of 80%-125%. Additionally, only one subject experienced one adverse event (AE). High-fat meals reduced the Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ , but had no significant effects on the λz, t1/2 , or Tmax of rosuvastatin. In the current study, the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product, and a single dose of rosuvastatin (10mg) was well-tolerated. Food decreased the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin without the effects on the Tmax or elimination rate.

Effect of Green Tea Extract and Soy Isoflavones on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin in Healthy Volunteers.

Background and AimGreen tea and soy products are extensively consumed in daily life. Research has shown that green tea catechins and soy isoflavones may influence the activity of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. We examined whether regular consumption of green tea extract or soy isoflavones affected the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of rosuvastatin in healthy subjects and whether any interactions were influenced by the polymorphism in the drug transporter ABCG2.Study DesignThis was an open-label, three-phase randomized crossover study with single doses of rosuvastatin.MethodsHealthy Chinese male subjects were given a single dose of rosuvastatin 10 mg on 3 occasions: 1. without herbs; 2. with green tea extract; 3. with soy isoflavone extract. The green tea and soy isoflavone extract were given at a dose containing EGCG 800 mg once daily or soy isoflavones−80 mg once daily for 14 days before statin dosing and at the same time as the statin dosing with at least 4-weeks washout period between phases.ResultsTwenty healthy male subjects completed the study and the intake of green tea extract significantly reduced the systemic exposure to rosuvastatin by about 20% reducing AUC0−24h from [geometric mean (% coefficient of variation)] 108.7 (28.9) h·μg/L to 74.1 (35.3) h·μg/L and Cmax from 13.1 (32.2) μg/L to 7.9 (38.3) μg/L (P < 0.001 for both), without affecting the elimination half-life. The ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism had a significant effect on rosuvastatin exposure but no impact on the interaction with green tea. Soy isoflavones had no significant effect on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics.ConclusionThis study showed that repeated administration of green tea extract significantly reduced the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin in healthy volunteers. These effects might be predicted to either reduce or increase the lipid-lowering effect of rosuvastatin depending on the mechanism of the effect.

Changes in Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics During Postnatal Ontogenesis in Rats.

Statin therapy should be considered in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and sustained high LDL-C levels. There are no data on rosuvastatin exposure in patients <6 years and efficacy/safety can only be derived from case reports. Our aim was to examine developmental changes in pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in ratsin vivoas a basis for clinical development of formulations for patients < 6 years. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics was examined in rats aged 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days (from birth to sexual maturity). After intraperitoneal dose of 5 mg/kg, blood samples to determine serum rosuvastatin levels were taken at 0.5, 3 and 5 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters (Vd, CL, AUClast, AUC0-∞) were calculated using pharmacokinecic simulations. Both rosuvastatin CL and Vd started to increase systematically between 2 - 3 weeks of age, which was reflected by decreased total drug exposure. The AUC was up to 13 times higher in the age groups ≤14 days compared with the value at 42 days. Based on interspecies scaling, a dose reduction could be a feasible way, how to develop appropriate dosing schedule and formulations for children aged 2 - 6 years. However, confirmation in clinical development studies will be needed.

Assessment of the Effect of Filgotinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants.

Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase‐1 preferential inhibitor, is approved in Europe and Japan for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality; thus, it is important to understand potential drug‐drug interactions of filgotinib with lipid‐lowering agents. This open‐label, randomized, 2‐way crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin with and without filgotinib coadministration. Healthy participants (N = 27) received single doses of atorvastatin (40 mg) and of a pravastatin (40 mg)/rosuvastatin (10 mg) cocktail—alone or with filgotinib (200 mg once daily for 11 days)—on 2 different occasions with washout in between. Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least‐squares mean (GLSM) ratio of the test treatment (statin coadministration with filgotinib) vs statin alone, with prespecified lack‐of‐interaction bounds of 0.70 to 1.43. Coadministration of filgotinib did not affect atorvastatin area under the plasma concentration–time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf; [GLSM ratios (90% CI): 0.91 (0.84‐0.99)]), but maximum concentration [Cmax] was slightly lower [0.82 (0.69‐0.99)]. The exposure of 2‐hydroxy‐atorvastatin was unaffected (GLSM ratios [90% CI], 0.98 [0.81‐1.19] for Cmax; 1.11 [1.02‐1.22] for AUCinf). Pravastatin AUCinf was also unaffected (GLSM ratios, 1.22 [1.05‐1.41], but Cmax was slightly higher 1.25 [1.01‐1.54]). Rosuvastatin exposure was moderately higher with filgotinib coadministration—GLSM ratios (90% CI), 1.68 (1.43‐1.97) for Cmax; 1.42 (1.30‐1.57) for AUCinf—but this was not considered clinically relevant. These results indicate that filgotinib has no clinically meaningful effect on exposure of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 2B1-mediated pharmacokinetic interactions by apple polyphenols

Organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 2B1 plays a critical role in the intestinal absorption of substrate drugs. Apple juice reportedly interacts with OATP2B1 substrate drugs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two apple polyphenols, phloretin and phloridzin, on OATP2B1-mediated substrate transport in vitro and to evaluate the effect of phloretin on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in rats. In vitro studies revealed that both polyphenols inhibited OATP2B1-mediated uptake of estrone-3-sulfate. Despite preincubation with phloretin and subsequent washing, the inhibitory effect was retained. Phloretin markedly decreased OATP2B1-mediated rosuvastatin uptake, with an IC50 value of 3.6 μM. On coadministering rosuvastatin and phloretin in rats, the plasma concentration of rosuvastatin 10 min after oral administration was significantly lower than that in the vehicle group. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin was not significant, showing a tendency to decrease in the phloretin group when compared with the vehicle group. The in-situ rat intestinal loop study revealed the inhibitory effect of phloretin on rosuvastatin absorption. Phloretin has potent and long-lasting inhibitory effects on OATP2B1 in vitro. Phloretin may inhibit OATP2B1-mediated intestinal absorption of rosuvastatin; however, it failed to significantly impact the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin in rats.

Application of a PBPK model to elucidate the changes of systemic and liver exposures for rosuvastatin, carotegrast, and bromfenac followed by OATP inhibition in monkeys.

The impact of organic anion‐transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibition on systemic and liver exposures of three OATP substrates was investigated in cynomolgus monkeys. A monkey physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed to describe the exposure changes followed by OATP functional attenuation. Rosuvastatin, bromfenac, and carotegrast were administered as a single intravenous cassette dose (0.5 mg/kg each) in monkeys with and without predosing with rifampin (RIF; 20 mg/kg) orally. The plasma exposure of rosuvastatin, bromfenac, carotegrast, and OATP biomarkers, coproporphyrin I (CP‐I) and CP‐III were increased 2.3, 2.1, 9.1, 5.4, and 8.8‐fold, respectively, when compared to the vehicle group. The liver to plasma ratios of rosuvastatin and bromfenac were reduced but the liver concentration of the drugs remained unchanged by RIF treatment. The liver concentrations of carotegrast, CP‐I, and CP‐III were unchanged at 1 h but increased at 6 h in the RIF‐treated group. The passive permeability, active uptake, and biliary excretion were characterized in suspended and sandwich‐cultured monkey hepatocytes and then incorporated into the monkey PBPK model. As demonstrated by the PBPK model, the plasma exposure is increased through OATP inhibition while liver exposure is maintained by passive permeability driven from an elevated plasma level. Liver exposure is sensitive to the changes of metabolism and biliary clearances. The model further suggested the involvement of additional mechanisms for hepatic uptakes of rosuvastatin and bromfenac, and of the inhibition of biliary excretion for carotegrast, CP‐I, and CP‐III by RIF. Collectively, impaired OATP function would not reduce the liver exposure of its substrates in monkeys.

Rosuvastatin exposure in female Wistar rats alters uterine contractility and do not show evident (anti)estrogenic effects

Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor drugs that lead to serum-cholesterol-lowering effects. Rosuvastatin, a third-generation statin, has shown better results in reducing cholesterol concentrations when compared to other widely prescribed statins. Recent studies by our group reported that rosuvastatin impairs reproductive function in rats possibly by disrupting the reproductive-endocrine axis. In this study, we evaluated whether rosuvastatin presents estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects, by an in vivo uterotrophic assay in rats, and investigated the direct effect of this drug upon rat uterine tissue contractility both in non-gravid and gravid periods. Rosuvastatin exposure in vivo at doses of 0 (control), 3, and 10 mg/kg/d was not associated with estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects on uterine tissue. However, in vivo (doses of 0, 3, and 10 mg/kg/d) and ex vivo (concentrations of 0, 1, 10, and 100 µg/mL) exposures to this drug were related to alterations in uterine basal contraction pattern. Furthermore, in vivo and ex vivo rosuvastatin exposures potentially modulate the action of uterine contraction inducers carbachol, norepinephrine, and prostaglandin E2. Thus, rosuvastatin can affect uterine physiology not necessarily by an endocrine mechanism related to the estrogen signaling, but possibly by its pleiotropic effects, with indirect tissue and cellular interactions, since in vivo and ex vivo exposures of uterine fragments to rosuvastatin presented different responses in uterine contractile parameters, which require further studies upon the precise mechanism of action of this drug in female reproductive function.

Rosuvastatin Myotoxicity After Starting Canagliflozin Treatment.

TO THE EDITOR: Brailovski and colleagues (1) attributed their patient's rosuvastatin-induced myotoxicity to a possible rosuvastatin–canagliflozin interaction. The assumed interaction was based on known and speculated factors. The known factors include the roles of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) 1B1 and 1B3 in facilitating rosuvastatin uptake into hepatocytes and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in facilitating its intestinal absorption and biliary/renal elimination. Subsequent speculation was that rosuvastatin accumulation resulted from inhibition of the OATPs and BCRP by canagliflozin. However, this speculation is not supported by the cited study. Canagliflozin had less than 50% in vitro inhibition of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, and canagliflozin in vivo inhibition of the uptake transporters was determined not to be expected according to basic models. Moreover, canagliflozin was not found to be an inhibitor of BCRP at the highest feasible concentration in the used assay (2). We believe that the development of rhabdomyolysis in this case was multifactorial and involved patient and drug characteristics. Patients of Asian descent have been shown to have an approximately 2-fold increase in rosuvastatin exposure compared with White patients at similar doses. Hence, a rosuvastatin dosage of 40 mg/d is contraindicated in Asian patients in Canadian prescribing information (3). Furthermore, this patient's pharmacogenetic testing showed a c421 C>A polymorphism in the ABCG2 gene encoding for BCRP; this could have played a role in this patient's rosuvastatin-altered pharmacokinetics. The baseline plasma rosuvastatin level at which patients can tolerate this medication varies widely on the basis of clinical and pharmacogenetic predictors (4). Change in renal function after canagliflozin initiation also should be considered. In the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial, canagliflozin initiation was associated with an initial short-term reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (5). This patient's chronic kidney disease (stage 3B) at baseline predisposed her to a decrease in estimated creatinine clearance to less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 after canagliflozin initiation and a potential 3-fold increase in rosuvastatin exposure. The rosuvastatin dosage should not have exceeded 10 mg/d per dosing recommendations (3). In summary, a more plausible explanation for this patient's development of rhabdomyolysis is short-term worsening of renal function secondary to canagliflozin initiation in addition to her predisposing factors (that is, Asian descent, receipt of a rosuvastatin dosage of 40 mg/d, advanced age [76 years], and stage 3B chronic kidney disease) that resulted in rosuvastatin accumulation, subsequent rhabdomyolysis, and associated hepatic injury. Nevertheless, this case remains valuable because it highlights the importance of considering an initial decrease in renal function with canagliflozin, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease. Close monitoring and appropriate dose adjustments are warranted in such patients.

Effect of Green Tea and (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin.

Green tea can inhibit OATPs, so it may interact with the substrate of OATPs, such as rosuvastatin. This study aimed to investigate the effects of green tea on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and its mechanism. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received different doses of green tea extract (GTE) and (-)- epigallocatechin-3- gallate (EGCG). Caco-2 cells and OATP1B1-HEK293T cells were used in drug uptake and transport assay. The matrix concentrations of rosuvastatin and catechins were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). GTE and EGCG were both found to increase the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of rosuvastatin ((p<0.050). In the Caco-2 cell model, the uptake and transport of rosuvastatin in the GTE groups were 1.94-fold (p<0.001) and 2.11-fold (p<0.050) higher, respectively, than those of the control group. However, in the EGCG group, the uptake and transport of rosuvastatin were decreased by 22.62% and 44.19%, respectively (p<0.050). In the OATP1B1- HEK293T cell model, the OATP1B1-mediated rosuvastatin uptake was decreased by GTE to 35.02% of that in the control (p<0.050) and was decreased by EGCG to 45.61% of that in the control (p<0.050). GTE increased the systemic rosuvastatin exposure in rats. The mechanism may include an increase in rosuvastatin absorption and a decrease in liver distribution by inhibiting OATP1B1. EGCG may be the main ingredient of green tea that affects the pharmacokinetic parameters of rosuvastatin. Our results showed the importance of conducting green tea-rosuvastatin study.

Short- and long-term effects on reproductive parameters of female Wistar rats after exposure to rosuvastatin starting in pre-puberty

Statins are a class of drugs that act lowering lipid levels by inhibiting cholesterol biosynthesis. Additionally, statins can act by “pleiotropic effects”, related to the inhibition of synthesis of the other mevalonate pathway products. Rosuvastatin is a third-generation statin and has shown better results in reducing cholesterol concentrations when compared to other statins. Recent studies suggest that rosuvastatin may act as an endocrine disruptor that potentially damages the hormonal axis and, consequently reproductive development and function of male rats. However, the effects of rosuvastatin exposure on rat female reproductive parameters remain unknown. In this study female rats were exposed to rosuvastatin at the doses of 0 (control), 3, or 10 mg/Kg.bw−1/day from pre-puberty to adulthood. No alterations in the female reproductive parameters were observed at a dose of 3 mg/Kg.bw−1. However, females exposed to 10 mg/Kg.bw−1 exhibited shorter estrous cycles, altered copulatory behavior, decreased serum prolactin level, and alterations in the liver, pituitary and placental weights, parameters to some extent influenced by the reproductive hormonal axis signaling pathway. On the other hand, pubertal onset, reproductive hormone levels, fertility, and histological parameters of the ovary, uterus, and placenta were unaltered by exposure to both doses of this statin. Thus, rosuvastatin exposure, at the higher dose, altered the reproductive function of female rats, probably due to the pleiotropic effects of this statin. Additional studies on the effects of this statin on female reproductive function and development are encouraged to better characterize its mode of action.

Impact of Plasma Exposure of Statins and Their Metabolites With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chinese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

The selection of optimum statin intensity is inconclusive, and the association of plasma exposure of statins and metabolites with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) is unclear. This study sought to compare the effect of low (quartile 1), intermediate (quartiles 2 and 3), and high (quartile 4) plasma exposure of statins and metabolites on MACE, re-ischemia events and death in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) at 5 years. A total of 1,644 patients in atorvastatin (AT) cohort and 804 patients in rosuvastatin (RST) cohort were included, and their plasma concentration of statins and metabolites was categorized as low-, mid-, or high-group. The association between the plasma levels of statins and metabolites and the incidence of primary endpoint in patients was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Intensive AT exposure (Q4 > 5.32 ng/ml) was significantly associated with increased risk of death compared with low (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.522; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.035–1.061; P = 0.0022) or moderate exposure (HR: 2.054; 95% CI: 1.348–3.130; P = 0.0008). This association was also found in AT’s five metabolites (all P < 0.01). In patients with RST treatment, moderate RST concentration (0.53–4.29 ng/ml) versus low concentration had a significantly lower risk of MACE and re-ischemia events. (HR: 0.532, 95% CI: 0.347–0.815, P = 0.0061 and HR: 0.505, 95% CI: 0.310–0.823, P = 0.0061, respectively). A higher plasma exposure of AT and metabolites has a significantly higher risk of death, and moderate RST exposure has a significantly lower risk of MACE and re-ischemia events in Chinese patients with CAD. The harms of high plasma exposure should be considered when prescribing statins to patients because it may be a risk factor for having poor prognosis in patients with CAD.

Febuxostat, But Not Allopurinol, Markedly Raises the Plasma Concentrations of the Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Substrate Rosuvastatin.

Xanthine oxidase inhibitors febuxostat and allopurinol are commonly used in the treatment of gout. Febuxostat inhibits the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in vitro. Rosuvastatin is a BCRP substrate and genetic variability in BCRP markedly affects rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In this study, we investigated possible effects of febuxostat and allopurinol on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In a randomized crossover study with 3 phases, 10 healthy volunteers ingested once daily placebo for 7 days, 300 mg allopurinol for 7 days, or placebo for 3 days, followed by 120 mg febuxostat for 4 days, and a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin on day 6. Febuxostat increased the peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve of rosuvastatin 2.1‐fold (90% confidence interval 1.8–2.6; P = 5 × 10−5) and 1.9‐fold (1.5–2.5; P = 0.001), but had no effect on rosuvastatin half‐life or renal clearance. Allopurinol, on the other hand, did not affect rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In vitro, febuxostat inhibited the ATP‐dependent uptake of rosuvastatin into BCRP‐overexpressing membrane vesicles with a half‐maximal inhibitory concentration of 0.35 µM, whereas allopurinol showed no inhibition with concentrations up to 200 µM. Taken together, the results suggest that febuxostat increases rosuvastatin exposure by inhibiting its BCRP‐mediated efflux in the small intestine. Febuxostat may, therefore, serve as a useful index inhibitor of BCRP in drug‐drug interaction studies in humans. Moreover, concomitant use of febuxostat may increase the exposure to BCRP substrate drugs and, thus, the risk of dose‐dependent adverse effects.