ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Research Articles

Comparison of Different ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clones and Consistency with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

The study of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has gained importance as it enables personalized treatment of NSCLC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Therefore, it is important that the ROS1 assessment tests become more standardized. In this study, we compared the two immunohistochemistry (IHC) antibodies (D4D6 and SP384 clones) and consistency with the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results in NSCLC. To investigate the effectiveness of the commonly used two IHC antibodies (SP384 and D4D6 clones) to detect ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC. A retrospective cohort study. The study included 103 samples diagnosed with NSCLC, confirmed using IHC and FISH ROS1 results (14 positives, four discordant, and 85 consecutive negatives), with sufficient tissue samples (≥ 50 tumor cells). All samples were initially tested with ROS1-IHC antibodies (D4D6 and SP384 clones); their ROS1 status was then analyzed using the FISH method. Finally, samples with discordant IHC and FISH results were confirmed using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method. The sensitivity of SP384 and D4D6 clones of ROS1 antibody was 100% with a ≥ 1 + cut-off. When the ≥ 2 + cut-off was used, the sensitivity rate for the SP384 clone was 100%, whereas the sensitivity for the D4D6 clone was 42.86%. ROS1 FISH rearranged samples were positive for both clones, but SP384 had generally higher intensity than D4D6. The mean IHC score was + 2 for SP384 and + 1.17 for D4D6. SP384 mostly tended to have a higher IHC score intensity, which made the evaluation easier than D4D6. SP384 has a higher sensitivity than D4D6. However, false positives were found in both clones. There was no significant correlation between ROS1 FISH-positivity percentage with SP384 (p = 0.713, p = 0.108) and D4D6 (p = 0.26, p = -0.323) IHC staining intensity. The staining patterns of both clones were similar (homogeneity/heterogeneity). Our findings show that the SP384 clone is more sensitive than D4D6. However, SP384 can also cause false positive results like D4D6. Knowing the variable diagnostic performance of different ROS1 antibodies before using them in clinical applications is necessary. IHC-positive results should be confirmed using FISH.

False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy.

In-situ hybridization (ISH) is a diagnostic tool in the detection of chromosomal anomalies, which has important implications for diagnosis, classification and prediction of cancer therapy in various diseases. Certain thresholds of number of cells showing an aberrant pattern are commonly used to declare a sample as positive for genomic rearrangements. The phenomenon of polyploidy can be misleading in the interpretation of break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cell size and ploidy on FISH results. In sections of varying thickness of control liver tissue and non-small cell lung cancer cases, nuclear size was measured and the number of MET chromogenic ISH and ALK FISH (liver) or ALK and ROS1 FISH (lung cancer) signals was manually counted and quantified. In liver cell nuclei the number of FISH/chromogenic ISH signals increases with nuclear size related to physiological polyploidy and is related to section thickness. In non-small cell lung cancer cases tumour cells with higher ploidy levels and nuclear size have an increased chance of single signals. Furthermore, additional lung cancer samples with borderline ALK FISH results were examined with a commercial kit for rearrangements. No rearrangements could be demonstrated, proving a false positive ALK FISH result. In case of polyploidy there is an increased likelihood of false positivity when using break apart FISH probes. Therefore, we state that prescribing one single cut-off in FISH is inappropriate. In polyploidy, the currently proposed cut-off should only be used with caution and the result should be confirmed by an additional technique.

Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas.

Sambit K. MohantyObjective Repressor of Silencing ( ROS1 ) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe. Statistical Analysis The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated. Results A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120-270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71-99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79-89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18-5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01-0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86-90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74-98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively. Conclusion ROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas.

Abstract 1271: Detection of ALK, ROS1 and RET fusion transcripts in FFPE samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients using a novel RT-PCR based assay

Abstract Background and objective: Detection of genomic rearrangements like ALK fusions are mandatory in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as those alterations can be targeted by an increasing number of drugs. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard but multiplexed technologies allow the analysis of several targets simultaneously. We have evaluated a novel RT-PCR based assay for the detection of ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangement in NSCLC patients in this research study. Materials and Methods: FFPE tissue sections from 309 patients with late stage NSCLC were screened for ALK and ROS1 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and confirmed with FISH. Total nucleic acids were extracted from tissue sections using the Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE kit (Promega). Fusions were detected by RT-PCR using a prototype ALK/RET/ROS1 Fusion Panel assay (Roche). A subset of discordant cases were further analyzed by RNA sequencing using the QIAseq Targeted RNAscan Lung Cancer Panel (Qiagen). Results: All 309 samples were tested by RT-PCR with a 0% invalid rate. ALK fusions were detected in 39 samples: 29 were ALK FISH+, 5 were ALK FISH not contributive, 3 were ALK FISH- (less than 15% tumor cells presenting a gene fusion), and 2 were ALK IHC- and not tested by FISH. ROS1 fusions were detected in 12 samples: 9 were ROS1 FISH+, 1 was ROS1 FISH-, and 2 were ROS1 IHC- and not tested by FISH. RET fusions were detected in 3 samples. The remaining 255 samples were RT-PCR-: 5 were ALK FISH+ containing fusions not covered by the RT-PCR assay, 1 was ALK FISH+ containing ALK polysomy, 1 was ROS1 FISH+ containing a fusion not covered by the RT-PCR assay, 1 was ROS1 FISH+ containing ROS1 amplification, 1 was ROS1 FISH+ but ROS1 RNAseq-, and 246 samples were IHC- or IHC+/FISH-. The overall concordance rate between RT-PCR and FISH for ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements was 91.9%. Although the RT-PCR assay did not detect 5 ALK and 1 ROS1 fusions due to design limitations, it did identify the presence of fusions in 9 tumors that were undetected by FISH (8 ALK and 1 ROS1). Conclusion: Using limited amount of biological material, RT-PCR was able to detect a substantial majority of ALK and ROS1 fusions identified by FISH, as well as fusions that were missed by the initial IHC/FISH screening. This study demonstrates RT-PCR as a feasible approach to detecting fusions in NSCLC. Citation Format: Marc G. Denis, Audrey Vallée, Christine Sagan, Guillaume Herbreteau, Sandrine Charpentier, Jaya Rajamani, Michael Lee, Ellen Ordinario. Detection of ALK, ROS1 and RET fusion transcripts in FFPE samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients using a novel RT-PCR based assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1271.

Histologic and Molecular Characterization of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Discordant ROS1 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) positivity requires follow-up with confirmatory testing such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Identifying predictive characteristics of false positive ROS1 IHC cases could aid in optimizing testing algorithms, decrease testing costs and preserve tissue. Retrospective results were retrieved for 2054 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma submitted to our laboratory for molecular testing. Reflex ROS1 FISH was done on all ROS1 immunoreactive cases using ROS1 D4D6 antibody. Staining intensity and histo-score was recorded for all ROS1 immunoreactive cases. Results of any additional molecular testing (KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, ALK FISH, RET FISH, MET FISH) were also tabulated. ROS1 immunoreactivity was seen in 305/2054 (14.8%) cases. Immunoreactivity was weak in majority of the cases with only 4.6% cases having an histo-score >100 and 5.9% of cases had moderate staining intensity. FISH was negative in 99% (302/305) cases with any degree of IHC expression (discordant cases) while 3 cases were positive by FISH. Diffuse strong IHC staining in greater than 90% of the tumor was noted in 6 cases, 3 (0.98%) of which were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. The discordant cases had significantly higher rates of EGFR mutations (P<0.0005) in comparison to ROS1 IHC negative cases, were seen more often in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma (P<0.0005) with lepidic and acinar patterns, and more likely to occur in primary lung carcinomas (P<0.0005). False positive ROS1 immunoreactivity was very frequent, occurred more commonly in primary NSCLC cases with acinar and/or lepidic histologies and was more likely in EGFR mutated cases. Using higher positivity thresholds for ROS1 IHC and incorporating the histologic and molecular correlates into algorithmic strategies could result in increased specificity and clinical utility of ROS1 IHC assay.

Abstract 470: Evaluation of two receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) clones by immunohistochemistry

Abstract Introduction: ROS1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase which regulates growth and cell division. ROS1 chromosomal rearrangements have been identified in a variety of human malignancies including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, patients diagnosed specifically with ROS1+ lung adenocarcinoma accounts for 1-2 percent of all NSCLC cases. Increased expression of ROS1 may suggest a ROS1 gene rearrangement. This is similar to ALK+ NSCLC tumors. Some ALK inhibitors can also be effective in tumors having the ROS1 mutation. Therefore, the development of targeted therapies has enhanced the importance of an accurate classification of the cancer subtypes. Materials and Methods: Immunohistochemistry: Both, the Biocare ROS1 rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone EPMGHR2) and the Roche VENTANA ROS1 (SP384) rabbit antibody were used in a ready-to-use format. ROS1 antibodies were run on the intelliPATH FLX, VALENT and the Ventana BenchMark Ultra platforms with in-house control and commercially available tissues from US Biolabs. Detection strategies utilized an HRP 2-step polymerized approach on the Biocare instruments, whereas the Optiview DAB IHC Detection kit was used on the Ventana platform. Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH): FISH was performed on a fully automated ONCORE Pro autostainer using the ROS1 (6q22) Break Apart (BA) (Orange/Green) FISH probe diluted in Biocare zipFISH hybridization buffer. Results: Initially, the NSCLC tissues were screened with a ROS1 BA FISH probe to identify the ROS1 mutation. Results indicated that the mutation was present on tumor cells throughout the tissue. When compared to FISH results on adjacent sections, a direct correlation between the ROS1 antibody staining and FISH results showed a good staining overlap. IHC staining on the intelliPATH FLX exhibited better signal-to-noise ratio for the Biocare ROS1 antibody compared to the Ventana antibody. A more concentrated Biocare antibody was required to obtain equivalent or better staining on the intelliPATH FLX than the Ventana ROS1 on the VENTANA ULTRA platform. However, the Biocare ROS1 in certain regions showed better staining than the Ventana ROS1. Biocare ROS1 at the same concentration produced a comparable staining on both the IntelliPATH FLX and the VALENT platforms. Conclusions: The availability of high quality ROS1 antibodies from alternative sources can be beneficial for labs performing lung cancer screening. Our rabbit monoclonal ROS1 antibody has been shown to produce strong and consistent signals with exceptional signal-to-noise. These results have been verified by using highly sensitive FISH probes in combination with a well-characterized commercially available ROS1 antibody. Citation Format: Julio S. Masabanda, Tatiana Scoggin, Joseph Vargas, Jason Ramos. Evaluation of two receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) clones by immunohistochemistry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 470.

Detection of ALK and ROS1 fusion transcripts in FFPE samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients using a novel RT-PCR based assay and targeted RNA sequencing.

e21695 Background: Detection of genomic rearrangements like ALK and ROS1 fusions are mandatory in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as those alterations can be targeted by an increasing number of drugs. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) has been so far the gold standard but multiplexed technologies would allow analysis of many potential targets simultaneously. We have evaluated a novel RT-PCR based assay and a targeted RNA sequencing solution for the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC patients. Methods: 41 patients with late stage NSCLC were included in the study. ALK and ROS1 status were screened on FFPE tissue sections using immunohistochemistry and confirmed with FISH. Total nucleic acids were extracted from tissue sections using the Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE kit (Promega). Detection of rearrangements was performed by RT-PCR using the prototype ALK/RET/ROS1 Fusion Panel assay (Roche), which detects 7 ALK fusion variants, 13 ROS1 variants and 6 RET variants. For RNA sequencing, the libraries were prepared with the QIAseq Targeted RNAscan Lung Cancer Panel (Qiagen). Sequencing was performed on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina). Results: We tested 16 ALK FISH+ tumors, 4 ROS1 FISH+ tumors, and 21 samples that were either IHC- or IHC+/FISH-. The RT-PCR assay detected 15 of the 16 ALK FISH+ tumors, and 3 of the 4 ROS1 FISH+ tumors. In the 21 IHC- or IHC+/FISH- samples, 1 additional ROS1 fusion and 1 RET fusion were detected. The remaining 19 assays samples were negative. 2 fusions were missed by RT-PCR because the assay design does not cover these rearrangements (KLC1-ALK and CTNND1-ROS1). With targeted RNA sequencing, we were able to detect 14 of the 16 ALK FISH+ tumors and all 4 of the ROS1 FISH+ tumors. We also identified 1 additional ROS1 fusion and 1 RET fusion in the 21 IHC- or IHC+/FISH- samples. 17 patients were negative and 2 tests were not contributive. Overall, using FISH as a reference, the sensitivity of both assays was 90% (18/20). Conclusions: Using limited amount of biological material, both RT-PCR and targeted RNA sequencing were able in one assay to detect the overwhelming majority of ALK and ROS1 fusions identified with FISH. These approaches also allowed us to detect gene rearrangements that were missed by the initial IHC/FISH screening. The RT-PCR assay requires less RNA (as little as 3 ng) and has a much faster turn-around time. The RNA sequencing approach allowed us to identify the fusion partners, but it requires much more RNA and is rather difficult to implement in routine practice.

ROS1 immunohistochemistry as a screening tool for detection of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison between SP384 and D4D6 clones.

e21733 Background: ROS1 rearrangement occurs in approximately 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancer, and it is predictive of treatment response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The gold standard method to detect ROS1 rearrangement is break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). ROS1 immunohistochemistry has been proposed as a cost-effective screening test for detection of ROS1 rearrangement. Most studies about the correlation between ROS1 FISH and immunohistochemistry derived from the D4D6 clone anti-ROS1 antibody. Recently, a novel anti-ROS1 antibody (SP384 clone) is available. However, data regarding the performance of this new anti-ROS1 antibody is still limited. In this study, we evaluated the performance of these two anti-ROS1 antibody as a screening tool to detect ROS1 rearrangement. Methods: Two hundred non-small cell lung cancers, including 18 ROS1 FISH-positive and 182 ROS1 FISH-negative samples, were studied. All specimens were stained with D4D6 clone and SP384 clone anti-ROS1 antibodies. The stained slides were scored by a pathologist using the H-score method, which was defined as the sum of products of multiplying intensity (0, 1, 2, and 3) by extent of each staining intensity (%). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cut-off value that discriminates between ROS1-rearranged and non-rearranged tumors. Results: There was high correlation between the H-score of D4D6 clone and SP384 clone (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.862, P-value &lt; 0.001). The SP384 clone showed a higher H-score than D4D6 clone (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P-value &lt; 0.001). ROC analysis showed H-score of ≥ 150 was the optimal cut-off value for both D4D6 clone and SP384 clone to discriminate between ROS1-rearranged and non-rearranged tumors. Using this cut-off value, the D4D6 clone showed 100% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity; the SP384 clone showed 100% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity. The areas under ROC curve for D4D6 clone and SP384 clone were 0.992 and 0.990, respectively. Conclusions: The performance of D4D6 clone or SP384 clone is comparable. ROS1 IHC with either D4D6 clone or SP384 clone is a cost-effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. [Table: see text]

Assessment of a New ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clone (SP384) for the Identification of ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: the ROSING Study

IntroductionThe ROS1 gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data. MethodsA total of 43 ROS1 FISH–positive and 193 ROS1 FISH–negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened by using two antibodies (clone D4D6 from Cell Signaling Technology and clone SP384 from Ventana Medical Systems), and the different interpretation criteria were compared with break-apart FISH (Vysis). FISH-positive samples were also analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Oncomine Dx Target Test Panel, Thermo Fisher Scientific). ResultsAn H-score of 150 or higher or the presence of at least 70% of tumor cells with an intensity of staining of 2+ or higher by the SP384 clone was the optimal cutoff value (both with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The D4D6 clone showed similar results, with an H-score of at least 100 (91% sensitivity and 100% specificity). ROS1 expression in normal lung was more frequent with use of the SP384 clone (p < 0.0001). The ezrin gene (EZR)-ROS1 variant was associated with membranous staining and an isolated green signal FISH pattern (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). ConclusionsThe new SP384 ROS1 IHC clone showed excellent sensitivity without compromising specificity, so it is another excellent analytical option for the proposed testing algorithm.

Abstract 3127: Multicenter study evaluating the ROS1 status in lung adenocarcinoma using the novel SP384 immunohistochemistry clone. Towards a new algorithm for ROS1 status assessment in routine

Abstract Background: The detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) lead to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen systematically for the ROS1rearrangement in this patient population. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), however ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test since is largely available, easy, rapid to perform, and cost-effective. However, some false positive and negative IHC results are observed when using the D4D6 clone leading to confirmatory ROS1 FISH in IHC positive samples. Patients and methods: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of anti-ROS1 SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, AZ) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) antibodies in a multicenter population of 336 LUAD cases enriched for ROS1 FISH positive cases (n=51) provided from 6 French molecular pathology platforms. Three senior lung pathologists independently scored the SP384 slides as positive or negative around a cutoff of staining in &amp;gt;30% tumor cells at a ≥2+ intensity level, and for the D4D6 clone around a cutoff of ≥2+ intensity level in any tumor cells. Inter-reader precision between pathologists was assessed. Results were correlated to the PFS and the OS of patients treated with crizotinib. Results: Sensitivity and specificity rates were 100% (95%CI 93.2-100%) and 99.31% (95%CI 97.51-99.92%) for the SP384 clone, and 90.6% (95%CI 79.34-96.87%) and 99.65% (95%CI 98.05-99.99%) for the D4D6 clone, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was 97.5% (95%CI 94.8-99.7) for the SP384 clone and 86.3% (95%CI 91.3-95.6) for the D4D6 clone. Overall, when compared to ROS1 FISH analysis, the SP384 clone had an accuracy of 99.4%, while D4D6 clone of 98.2%. Using log-rank test, we observed that LUAD with positive ROS1 SP384 status had a longer PFS than those characterized by the D4D6 clone (P=0.021). Conclusions: Interpretation above a cutoff of &amp;gt;30% tumor cells with staining at a ≥2+ intensity level, the ROS1 SP384 clone demonstrates superior sensitivity to D4D6 clone, while preserving similar specificity rate for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. The presented data provide evidence that the SP384 clone may be used for effective stratification prior to confirmation with orthogonal methods. Citation Format: Véronique Hofman, Isabelle Rouquette, Sandra Lassalle, Simon Heeke, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Nicolas Piton, Julien Mazières, Jean-Michel Vignaud, Clémence Yguel, Anne Laure Lepage, Frédéric Bibeau, Elodie Long-Mira, Katia Zahaf, Hugues Begueret, Jonathan Benzaquen, Michel Poudenx, Charles-Hugo Marquette, Marius Ilie, Paul Hofman. Multicenter study evaluating the ROS1 status in lung adenocarcinoma using the novel SP384 immunohistochemistry clone. Towards a new algorithm for ROS1 status assessment in routine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3127.

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

IntroductionThe detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective. MethodsWe evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms. ResultsIn the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722–0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830–0.956) for the SP384 clone. ConclusionsROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.

Next-generation Sequencing for ALK and ROS1 Rearrangement Detection in Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: Implications of FISH-positive Patterns

BackgroundDetection of ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements in non–small-cell lung cancer is required for directing patient care. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry have been established as gold standard methods, next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are called to be at least equally successful. Comparison of these methods for translation into daily use is currently under investigation. Patients and MethodsForty non–small-cell lung cancer paraffin-embedded samples with previous ALK (n = 33) and ROS1 (n = 7) FISH results were examined with the Oncomine Focus Assay and tested for ALK and ROS1 immunoreactivity. Clinical implications of concurrent molecular alterations and concordance between methods were evaluated. ResultsNGS was successful in 32 (80%) cases: 25 ALK and 7 ROS1. Few concomitant alterations were detected: 1 ALK rearranged case had an ALK p.L1196M-resistant mutation, 4 had CDK4, MYC, and/or ALK amplifications, and 1 ROS1 rearranged case showed a FGFR4 amplification. Comparison between techniques revealed 5 (16%) discordant cases that had lower progression-free survival than concordant cases: 7.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-13) versus 19.4 (95% confidence interval, 10.1-28.6). Remarkably, 4 of these cases had isolated 3' signal FISH pattern (P = .026). ConclusionOur data support that the identification of 3' isolated signal FISH pattern in ALK and ROS1 cases might suggest a false-positive result. NGS seems a reliable technique to assess ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, offering the advantage over immunohistochemistry of detecting other molecular alterations with potential therapeutic implications.

Multiplexed transcriptome analysis to detect ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung cancer

ALK, ROS1 and RET gene fusions are important predictive biomarkers for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Currently, the gold standard method for gene fusion detection is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while highly sensitive and specific, it is also labour intensive, subjective in analysis, and unable to screen a large numbers of gene fusions. Recent developments in high-throughput transcriptome-based methods may provide a suitable alternative to FISH as they are compatible with multiplexing and diagnostic workflows. However, the concordance between these different methods compared with FISH has not been evaluated. In this study we compared the results from three transcriptome-based platforms (Nanostring Elements, Agena LungFusion panel and ThermoFisher NGS fusion panel) to those obtained from ALK, ROS1 and RET FISH on 51 clinical specimens. Overall agreement of results ranged from 86–96% depending on the platform used. While all platforms were highly sensitive, both the Agena panel and Thermo Fisher NGS fusion panel reported minor fusions that were not detectable by FISH. Our proof–of–principle study illustrates that transcriptome-based analyses are sensitive and robust methods for detecting actionable gene fusions in lung cancer and could provide a robust alternative to FISH testing in the diagnostic setting.

Screening for ROS1 gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancers using immunohistochemistry with FISH confirmation is an effective method to identify this rare target.

To assess the prevalence of ROS1 rearrangements in a retrospective and prospective diagnostic Australian cohort and evaluate the effectiveness of immunohistochemical screening. A retrospective cohort of 278 early stage lung adenocarcinomas and an additional 104 prospective non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases referred for routine molecular testing were evaluated. ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed (D4D6 clone, Cell Signaling Technology) on all cases as well as fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using the ZytoVision and Abbott Molecular ROS1 FISH probes, with ≥15% of cells with split signals considered positive for rearrangement. Eighty-eight cases (32%) from the retrospective cohort showed staining by ROS1 IHC, and one case (0.4%) showed ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Nineteen of the prospective diagnostic cases showed ROS1 IHC staining, 12 (12%) cases of which were confirmed as ROS1 rearranged by FISH. There were no ROS1 rearranged cases that showed no expression of ROS1 with IHC. The ROS1 rearranged cases in the prospective cohort were all EGFR wild-type and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-negative. The sensitivity of ROS1 IHC in the retrospective cohort was 100% and specificity was 76%. ROS1 rearrangements are rare events in lung adenocarcinomas. Selection of cases for ROS1 FISH testing, by excluding EGFR/ALK-positive cases and use of IHC to screen for potentially positive cases, can be used to enrich for the likelihood of identifying a ROS1 rearranged lung cancer and prevent the need to undertake expensive and time-consuming FISH testing in all cases.

High Prevalence of Concomitant Oncogene Mutations in Prospectively Identified Patients with ROS1-Positive Metastatic Lung Cancer

Chromosomal rearrangements involving ROS1 define a rare entity of lung adenocarcinomas with exquisite sensitivity to molecularly targeted therapy. We report clinical outcomes and genomic findings of patients with ROS1-positive lung cancer who were prospectively identified within a multiplex biomarker profiling program at the West German Cancer Center. Standardized immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and hotspot mutation analyses were performed in 1345 patients with advanced cancer, including 805 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Clinical and epidemiological data were retrieved from the institutional database. ROS1 positivity by IHC analysis was detected in 25 patients with lung cancer (4.8% of lung adenocarcinomas), including 13 patients (2.5%) with ROS1 FISH positivity with a cutoff of at least 15% of events. Of the ROS1 IHC analysis-positive cases, 36% presented with concomitant oncogenic driver mutations involving EGFR (six cases, five of which were clinically validated by response to EGFR-targeting agents), KRAS (two cases), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA), and BRAF. Three cases initially classified as ROS1 FISH-negative passed the threshold of 15% positive events when repeat biopsies were analyzed at progression. The median overall survival of the ROS1-positive patients (104 months) was significantly superior to that of the 261 patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1-negative lung adenocarcinoma (24.4 months, p= 0.044). Interestingly, the overall survival of the 13 ROS1-positive patients with lung cancer from initiation of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was significantly prolonged when compared with that of 169 pemetrexed-treated patients with EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1-negative adenocarcinoma (p= 0.01). ROS1-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinomas frequently harbor concomitant oncogenic driver mutations. Levels of ROS1 FISH-positive events are variable over time. This heterogeneity provides additional therapeutic options if discovered by multiplex biomarker testing and repeat biopsies.

Rare Incidence of ROS1 Rearrangement in Cholangiocarcinoma.

PurposeThe recent discovery and characterization of an oncogenic ROS1 gene rearrangement has raised significant interest because small molecule inhibitors are effective in these tumors. The aim of this study was to determine frequency and clinicopathological features associated with ROS1 rearrangement in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).Materials and MethodsA total of 261 patients who underwent surgery for CCA between October 1997 and August 2013 were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. ROS1 rearrangement was evaluated by break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization using tissue microarrays of these patients.ResultsOf 261 CCA evaluated, three cases (1.1%) showed ROS1 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), all of which were derived from intrahepatic origin. ROS1 protein expression was observed in 38 samples (19.1%). Significantly larger tumor size was observed in ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC)–negative patients compared with ROS1 IHC–positive patients. ROS1 FISH–positive patients had a single tumor with a median size of 4 cm and well-to-moderate differentiation. Overall, there was no difference in terms of baseline characteristics, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival between ROS1-positive and -negative patients.ConclusionROS1 rearrangement was detected in 1.1% of CCA patients. Although rare, conduct of clinical trials using ROS1 inhibitors in these genetically unique patients is warranted.

ALK and ROS1 rearrangements tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cytological smears from advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

The identification of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and the availability of an effective target therapy, such as crizotinib, represent a new option in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In light of recent advances in non-invasive diagnostic procedures, we aimed to demonstrate that direct cytological smears are suitable for assessing ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in patients with NSCLC. Fifty-five patients with a cytological diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) were evaluated for ALK rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and 12 patients for ROS1 FISH rearrangements. Seventeen of the 55 cytological samples tested for ALK were obtained from the primary tumor and 38 from metastatic lesions. Ten of 12 samples evaluated for ROS1 were obtained from metastatic sites and two from the primary tumor. ALK FISH was successful in 49/55 (89%) cytological ADC samples and ROS1 FISH in all 12 cytological samples. ALK rearrangements were found in 3/13 (23%) primary tumors and 7/36 (19%) metastatic sites. ROS1 rearrangements were found in one of the two primary tumors and in two of the 10 metastases. Two of the three rearranged cases were tested on cytology after knowing that they were rearranged on histology in order to increase representativeness of ROS1 rearranged cases in this study. Whenever cytology represents the only available material for diagnosis and biological characterization of NSCLC, minimally invasive procedures may provide an additional important source of cellular material for FISH assessment of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

Construction of a repeat-free dual color fluorescent in situ hybridization probe for ROS1 gene in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis

To establish a repeat-free ROS1 gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe, and to compare its efficacy with those of commercial FISH probes in non-small cell lung cancer. The probe was constructed by combining human Cot-1 DNA genome into double-stranded sequence, and then digested by duples specific nuclease to establish a repeat-free sequence. The final repeat-free ROS1 FISH probe was labeled by red and green fluoresceins. Compared with the commercialized probe, repeat-free FISH probe exhibited excellent efficiency and low signal to noise ratio (SNR) in samples. There was statistical significance in the difference between the hybridization rate of these two probes (P < 0.05) , but there was no difference between the accuracy rate (P > 0.05). The repeat-free ROS1 FISH probe significantly improves the probe hybridization efficiency and SNR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in an increased accuracy of detection.

A Single-Tube Multiplexed Assay for Detecting ALK, ROS1, and RET Fusions in Lung Cancer

Approximately 7% of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) harbor oncogenic fusions involving ALK, ROS1, and RET. Although tumors harboring ALK fusions are highly sensitive to crizotinib, emerging preclinical and clinical data demonstrate that patients with ROS1 or RET fusions may also benefit from inhibitors targeting these kinases. Using a transcript-based method, we designed a combination of 3' overexpression and fusion-specific detection strategies to detect ALK, ROS1 and RET fusion transcripts in NSCLC tumors. We validated the assay in 295 NSCLC specimens and showed that the assay is highly sensitive and specific. ALK results were 100% concordant with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 52) and 97.8% concordant with IHC (n = 179) [sensitivity, 96.8% (95% CI 91.0%-98.9%); specificity, 98.8% (95% CI 93.6%-99.8%)]. For ROS1 and RET, we also observed 100% concordance with FISH (n = 46 and n = 15, respectively). We identified seven ROS1 and 14 RET fusion-positive tumors and confirmed the fusion status by RT-PCR and FISH. One RET fusion involved a novel partner, cutlike homeobox 1 gene (CUX1), yielding an in-frame CUX1-RET fusion. ROS1 and RET fusions were significantly enriched in tumors without KRAS/EGFR/ALK alterations. ALK/ROS1/RET/EGFR/KRAS alterations were mutually exclusive. As a single-tube assay, this test shows promise as a more practical and cost-effective screening modality for detecting rare but targetable fusions in NSCLC.

ROS1 Immunohistochemistry for Detection of ROS1-Rearranged Lung Adenocarcinomas

ROS1 gene rearrangements are reported in 1% to 2% of lung adenocarcinomas (ACAs) and are associated with response to the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ROS1 protein is a promising alternate screening modality. In this study, we examine the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH and describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of ROS1-rearranged lung tumors. ROS1 IHC was performed using clone D4D6 on whole-tissue sections. In a validation cohort, IHC was compared with ROS1 break-apart FISH in 53 cases of lung ACA enriched for an absence of known genetic alterations and never-smoking status. In a screening cohort, we performed ROS1 IHC on 167 consecutive cases of lung ACA from a routine molecular diagnostic practice and confirmed positive results by FISH. In the validation cohort, 6 cases (11%) were both FISH and IHC positive. One FISH-negative case was strongly ROS1 IHC positive. All IHC-negative cases were FISH negative. In the screening cohort, 2 of 167 (1.2%) had strong, diffuse ROS1 protein expression; a rearrangement was confirmed by FISH in both. ROS1-translocated tumors were wild type for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK and commonly had solid growth with mucinous/cribriform features and psammomatous calcification. ROS1 protein expression in tumor cells is 100% sensitive and 92% specific for ROS1 rearrangements by FISH. ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for this rare but clinically important subset of lung ACAs.