Root Replacement Research Articles

Incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes associated with permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic root replacement

ObjectivePermanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after aortic valve replacement is associated with long-term mortality. However, data regarding PPI after aortic root replacement (ARR) is lacking. Herein we describe the incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes of PPI after ARR. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing ARR from 2005 to 2020 were selected after excluding those with endocarditis, type A dissection, or preoperative PPI. Patients requiring PPI after ARR were identified, along with the indication and timing. Independent factors associated with PPI after ARR were identified and long-term survival was assessed. ResultsThe incidence of PPI was 3.8% (n = 85) among 2240 patients undergoing ARR. PPI was performed a median of 7 days (interquartile range, 5-12 days) after ARR most commonly for complete heart block (73%). Bicuspid aortic valve (odds ratio [OR], 1.89; P = .02), female sex (OR, 1.74; P = .04), preoperative heart block (OR, 2.70; P = .02), and prior aortic valve replacement (OR, 2.18; P = .01) were independently associated with PPI while preoperative aortic insufficiency (OR, 0.52; P = .01) and valve-sparing root replacement procedure compared with bio-Bentall (OR, 0.40; P = .01) were protective. Patients requiring PPI after ARR were not at increased risk of operative or long-term mortality compared with patients not requiring PPI (P = .26); however, those undergoing PPI experienced significantly longer hospital length of stay (13 vs 7 days; P < .001). ConclusionsThe incidence of PPI after ARR remains low, particularly after VSRR. Preoperative conduction disturbance, prior AVR, and bicuspid aortic valve are all associated with increased risk of PPI. Although PPI is associated with longer length of stay, it is not associated with early or late mortality.

Importance of surgeon's experience in practicing valve-sparing aortic root replacement

BackgroundValve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) requires a unique skill set. This study aimed to examine the influence of surgeon's procedural volume on outcomes of VSRR. MethodsThis retrospective study included 1697 patients from 2 large, high-volume aortic centers who underwent aortic root replacement (ARR) between 2004 and 2021 and were potentially eligible for VSRR. Surgeons were classified as performing <5 ARRs or ≥5 ARRs annually. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the independent association of surgeon volume and the decision to perform VSRR. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to match patients who were operated on by <5 ARR surgeons or ≥5 ARR surgeons and compare long-term survival probability. Cumulative incidence curves with mortality as a competing risk were plotted to compare the rate of aortic valve reoperation. ResultsOf 1697 patients who met the study inclusion criteria, 944 underwent composite-valve conduit ARR and 753 underwent VSRR. The median age of the cohort was 57 years (interquartile range, 45-66 years), and 268 (15.8%) were female. Aortic insufficiency was present in 1105 patients (65.1%), and 200 of the procedures (11.8%) were reoperations. The indication for surgery was aneurysm in 1496 patients (88.2%) and dissection in 201 (11.8%). Among the 743 patients who underwent VSRR, 691 (92%) were operated on by ≥ 5 ARR surgeons and 62 (8%) were operated on by <5 ARR surgeons. In multivariable logistic regression, ≥5 ARRs (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.34-4.73; P < .001) was associated with VSRR as the procedure of choice. Following IPTW, there was no significant difference between <5 ARR and ≥5 ARR surgeons in survival probability after VSRR (P = .59) or in the rate of aortic valve reoperation (P = .60). ConclusionsIn the setting of a high-volume aortic center, patients who undergo ARR are less likely to receive VSRR if operated on by a <5 ARR surgeon; however, VSRR may be safely performed by <5 ARR surgeons.

Impact of aortic root surgery during transcatheter aortic valve explant

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explantation is currently the fastest-growing cardiac surgery procedure. Issues surrounding TAVR explantation and subsequent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), specifically aortic root surgery, merit further investigation. MethodsA retrospective review of an institutional database identified cases of SAVR after TAVR, with or without concomitant aortic root operations, performed between January 1, 2014, and July 1, 2023, identifying 26 patients. Conventional statistical methods were used to compare groups. ResultsThe mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality for aortic valve replacement was 11.1 ± 6.0% in our cohort. Eight of 26 patients (30.8%) had undergone prior cardiac surgery. Concomitant aortic root enlargement or replacement was required in 12 of the 26 patients (46.2%). The time from TAVR to removal was longer for those requiring root operations compared to those who did not (mean, 783 ± 908 days vs 492 ± 486 days; P = .046). There was a trend toward more frequent infective endocarditis in patients requiring root operations (46.2% [n = 5/12] vs 21.4% [n = 3/14]; P = .155). The 30-day mortality was 19.2% (n = 5/26), with an observed-to-expected ratio of 1.72. Mortality was not significantly different between the 2 groups. ConclusionsTAVR explant remains a high-risk procedure, although adding aortic root enlargement/replacement does not appear to amplify the short-term mortality risk when performed at an experienced institution. These results are important when considering lifetime management of aortic stenosis, particularly in low-risk patients likely to require multiple interventions.

Aortic valve degeneration after valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortopathy or connective tissue disorder

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) in patients with bicuspid aortopathy (BAV) versus other connective tissue disorder (CTD). MethodsThis was a single-center cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing VSRR via reimplantation from 2000 to 2023 with BAV or CTD. Operative outcomes, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and cumulative risk of reoperation and recurrent aortic insufficiency (AI) with the competing risk of death were assessed. ResultsOf 516 patients who underwent VSRR, 109 (51.9%) had BAV and 101 (48.1%) had CTD. Patients with BAV were older (46.9 ± 10.4 vs 38.4 ± 14 years, P < .001) and more likely male (89.0% vs 56.4%, P < .001) and hypertensive (66.1% vs 28.7%, P < .001). Preoperative AI was similar (P = .57) between groups (30.3% mild, 18.3% moderate, 11.1% severe). Most patients had no/trivial immediate postoperative residual AI (96.3% vs 93.1%). Operative mortality was zero; postoperative adverse events were minimal. Mean clinical follow-up was 5.2 ± 4.4 years; 10-year survival was 95.6% versus 95.7% (P = .70). Echocardiographic follow-up was 3.9 ± 4.1 years; incidence of >2+ AI (9.7% vs 10.1%, P = 1.0) was similar between groups, whereas the incidence of moderate or greater aortic stenosis was greater with BAV (7.5% vs 0%, P = .02). Reoperation was low in both groups (3.7% vs 5.9%, P = .65). Competing risk analysis found no difference in reoperation hazard between BAV and CTD groups (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-1.81, P = .21). ConclusionsPatients with BAV and CTD have excellent operative outcomes, no mortality, and minimal residual AI after VSRR. Although the incidence of recurrent AI was similar, patients with BAV are at risk for AS.

Long-term outcome after the Ross procedure in 173 adults with up to 25 years of follow-up.

The potential risk of autograft dilatation and homograft stenosis after the Ross procedure mandates lifelong follow-up. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine long-term outcome of the Ross procedure, investigating autograft and homograft failure patterns leading to reintervention. All adults who underwent the Ross procedure between 1991 and 2018 at the University Hospitals Leuven were included, with follow-up data collected retrospectively. Autograft implantation was performed using the full root replacement technique. The primary end-point was long-term survival. Secondary end-points were survival free from any reintervention, autograft or homograft reintervention-free survival, and evolution of autograft diameter, homograft gradient and aortic regurgitation grade over time. A total of 173 adult patients (66% male) with a median age of 32 years (range 18-58 years) were included. External support at both the annulus and sinotubular junction was used in 38.7% (67/173). Median follow-up duration was 11.1 years (IQR, 6.4-15.9; 2065 patient-years) with 95% follow-up completeness. There was one (0.6%) perioperative death. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 15-year survival was 91.1% and Ross-related reintervention-free survival was 75.7% (autograft: 83.5%, homograft: 85%). Regression analyses demonstrated progressive neoaortic root dilatation (0.56 mm/year) and increase in homograft gradient (0.72 mmHg/year). The Ross procedure has the potential to offer excellent long-term survival and reintervention-free survival. These long-term data further confirm that the Ross procedure is a suitable option in young adults with aortic valve disease which should be considered on an individual basis.

Reoperative aortic root surgery: single-center long-term outcomes and literature review.

Reoperative aortic root surgery has become more and more common over the years and is considered high-risk, with significantly worse outcomes compared to first-procedure root surgery. At our institution, this kind of surgery is frequently performed. The aim of the present review is to describe currently available literature on reoperative surgery on the aortic root in terms of patients' population, indications for surgery and outcomes and to present our center's experience on the matter. A literature review was performed in order to identify pertinent studies. They were then compared and described. We also described preoperative characteristics, operative strategies and outcomes of all the patients who underwent redo aortic root surgery from January 1986 to December 2022 at our center. Our literature review identified 12 pertinent studies, with a total of 16,627 considered patients. The most frequent indications for redo surgery were endocarditis (35.5%), aneurysm, dissection and pseudoaneurysm. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 218 and 152 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%. When analyzing our center's data, 344 procedures were identified. Aortic root dilation was the most frequent indication (36.9%). Mean CPB and cross-clamp times were 218.0±78.8 and 158.2±49.7 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 9.6%. Survival at 5 and 15 years was 76.1% and 51.4% respectively. Freedom from further aortic reintervention was 88.1% after 5 years and 64.9% after 15 years. Reoperative aortic root surgery is a difficult cardiac procedure which is linked to significantly higher mortality than first-time root replacement. If it is performed by experienced surgeons with a careful preoperative planning its result can still be satisfactory. Our results showed acceptable rates of mortality and reinterventions at follow-up. Endocarditis, however, was linked to worse outcomes.

Rootless Tooth Hanging with Gutta Percha Cone: Report of a Case with Replacement Root Resorption

Rootless Tooth Hanging with Gutta Percha Cone: Report of a Case with Replacement Root Resorption

Tooth autotransplantation with adjunctive application of enamel matrix derivatives using a digital workflow: A prospective case series

ObjectivesDigital protocols and bioactive materials may reduce complications and improve tooth autotransplantation (ATT) success and survival rates. This prospective study assesses the performance of a fully digital autotransplantation protocol of close-apex molars with the adjunctive application of Enamel Matrix Derivatives (EMD). MethodsTwelve adult patients with 13 hopeless molar teeth were replaced with autotransplantation of closed apex third molars. Outcomes, including success and survival rates, clinical, endodontic, radiographic, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and digital image assessments, were conducted over a two-year follow-up period. ResultsSurvival and success rates were 100% and 91.2%, respectively, with no progressive inflammatory or replacement root resorption (ankylosis) except for one tooth presenting radiographic furcation involvement. A significant probing depth reduction of 2.4 ± 2.58 mm and CAL gains of 2.8 ± 3.03 mm were observed in transplanted teeth compared to the hopeless receptor teeth. Radiographic bone levels remained stable throughout the study period (-0.37 ± 0.66 mm), and digital image assessments showed minimal alveolar ridge width changes (-0.32 to -0.7 mm) and gingival margin changes (-0.95 to -1.27 mm) from baseline to last visit. PROMs indicated very high patient satisfaction. ConclusionThe use of a digital ATT protocol with adjunctive use of EMD in closed-apex third molars demonstrated promising short-term high success and survival rates. Additionally, this type of therapy adequately preserves the dimensions of the alveolar ridge in the receptor site. Clinical significanceThis is the first prospective clinical study examining the effect of a digital tooth autotransplantation protocol combined with the application of EMD. It demonstrates that this approach is an effective treatment for replacing hopeless teeth and also validates the digital assessment of ATT alveolar ridge preservation at the recipient site.

Less invasive replacement of aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch via partial upper sternotomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison with full sternotomy.

Less invasive surgery has emerged as an option for aortic pathologies. The current study compared our experience on early postoperative results of patients with aortic surgery between partial upper sternotomy (PUS) and full sternotomy (FS). We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing aortic root surgery with concomitant ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement. Exclusion criteria were type A aortic dissection and other concomitant major cardiac surgery. After propensity score matching, we compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with PUS versus FS. A total of 161 patients operated on between January 2013 and September 2022 met the inclusion criteria (PUS: n = 22, FS: n = 139). Propensity score matching yielded 22 pairs with a balanced distribution of propensity scores and covariates between the compared groups. There was no evidence that PUS affects cardiopulmonary bypass [108 (67-119) vs 113 (87-148) min, P = 0.154; PUS vs FS] and circulatory arrest duration [9 (7-10) vs 9 (8-13) min, P = 0.264; PUS vs FS]. There was a reduced cross-clamp duration in the PUS group [88 (58-96) vs 92 (71-122) min, P = 0.032]. Cumulative sum charts have shown consistently low cross-clamp and circulatory arrest duration for 2 experienced surgeons who performed 20 of the procedures in the PUS group (10 each). Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low, with no in-hospital mortality in the PUS group [0 vs 1(4.5%), P > 0.999] and absence of strokes in both groups. In summary, our initial experience suggests that less invasive aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement via PUS could be performed in our patient cohort as safely as via full sternotomy. Advantages for the patient are reduced surgical trauma, improved cosmetic results and-presumably-less pain.

Adverse Technical Events During Aortic Root Replacement

BackgroundAlthough adverse technical events during aortic root replacement (ARR) are not uncommon and are extremely challenging, there is scant literature to help surgeons prepare for such situations. We describe our experience of outstanding technical events during ARR. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 830 consecutive ARRs at a single center from 2012 to 2022. Technical events were defined as intraoperative events that led to an unplanned cardiac procedure, need for mechanical circulatory support, or additional aortic cross-clamping. Logistic regression identified factors associated with operative mortality and technical events. ResultsTechnical events occurred in 90 patients (10.8%) and were attributed to bleeding (n = 26), nonischemic ventricular dysfunction (n = 23), residual valve disease (n = 20), myocardial ischemia (n = 19), and iatrogenic dissection (n = 2). Prior sternotomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.36-4.19; P = .002) and complex aortic valve disease (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.09-8.75; P = .03) were associated with technical events. Patients with technical events had higher rates of operative mortality (6.7% vs 2.3%, P = .03) and all major postoperative complications. Surgical indications of dissection (OR, 13.57; 95% CI, 4.95-37.23; P < .001) and complex aortic valve disease (OR, 14.09; 95% CI, 3.67-54.02; P < .001) but not adverse technical events (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.81-7.26; P = .11) were associated with operative mortality. ConclusionsAdverse technical events occurred in 10.8% of ARRs and were associated with reoperative sternotomies. Technical events are associated with increased postoperative complications.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Repair Without Aortic Root Replacement: A Single-Center Experience.

Background Aortic valve (AV) repair is a challenging procedure due to its complexity, lower reproducibility, and steep learning curve. To examine its durability and validity, we investigated mid-term outcomes following AV repair without aortic root replacement. Methods Between March 2007 and May 2018, we retrospectively identified 14 patients who underwent AV repair without aortic root replacement at our institution. We investigated their baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes, including the reoperation rate due to aortic regurgitation (AR) recurrence. Furthermore, we divided them into two groups: those who required reoperation due to AR recurrence (Group R) and those who did not require reoperation (Group F), and statistically compared them. Results The median age was 52.5 years (IQR: 42.0-60.8), with 11 male patients (78.6%). Eight patients (57.1%) had a bicuspid AV. Five cases (35.7%) underwent reoperation due to AR recurrence during a median follow-up period of 5.5 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between Group R (n=5, 35.7%) and Group F (n=9, 64.3%), including AR etiology, AV repair procedure, and intraoperative AR grade after the final declamp. All cases in Group R had at least mild to moderate AR on the echocardiogram before discharge. Regarding the AR grade before discharge, Group R had a significantly higher grade than Group F (p = 0.013). Conclusions The indication for AV repair for AR might need to be reassessed due to the considerable mid-term reoperation rate. Cases of AV repair with more than mild AR at discharge should be carefully monitored, as they are likely to require future reoperation for AR.

The role of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in acute type A aortic dissection complicated by coronary malperfusion.

Managing acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion is challenging. This study outlines our revascularization strategy for these patients. Patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion and aortic root involvement from January 2000 to December 2021 were included. Patients were classified using the Neri classification for coronary dissection, including a novel 'Neri -' class (no coronary dissection). Patients undergoing revascularization either as a planned or as a bailout strategy due to persisting low cardiac output were compared additionally. The cohort comprised 195 patients: 43 (22%) Neri -, 43 (22%) Neri A, 74 (38%) Neri B and 35 (18%) Neri C. Aortic root replacement was mainly performed in 25 Neri C patients (71%; P < 0.001). Concomitant bypass surgery was performed in 4 (9%) of Neri -, 5 (12%) of Neri A, 21 (28%) of Neri B and 32 (91%) of Neri C patients (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 42% with 21 (49%) Neri -, 12 (28%) Neri A, 30 (41%) Neri B and 19 (54%) Neri C patients (P = 0.087). Bailout revascularization was primarily performed in 11 Neri B patients (69%; P = 0.001) and associated with a higher 30-day mortality of 81% compared to 48% for planned revascularization (P = 0.042). Postoperative outcomes in case of coronary malperfusion are poor, irrespective of the anatomic dissection pattern. The decision for concomitant bypass surgery is crucial but may be considered in Neri C patients combined with aortic root replacement. Bailout revascularization was most common in Neri B and showed dismal outcome.

Long-term outcomes of total arch replacement with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion using the "arch first" approach.

To report outcomes of total arch replacement (TAR) with hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) using an "arch first" approach for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The "arch first" approach involved revascularization of the aortic arch branch vessels with uninterrupted ACP, before lower body circulatory arrest, while the patient was cooling. This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2021. All patients who underwent TAR with bACP for ATAAD were included. Short-term and long-term outcomes were reported utilizing descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival estimation. A total of 215 patients were identified who underwent TAR + bACP for ATAAD. Age was 59.0 [49.0-67.0] years and 35.3% were female. 73 patients (34.0%) underwent a concomitant aortic root replacement, 188 (87.4%) had aortic cannulation, circulatory arrest time was 37.0 [26.0-52.0] minutes, and nadir temperature was 20.8 [19.4-22.5] degrees Celsius. 35 patients (16.3%) had operative mortality (STS definition), 17 (7.9%) had a new stroke, 79 (36.7%) had prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24h), 35 (16.3%) had acute renal failure (by RIFLE criteria), and 128 (59.5%) had blood product transfusions. One-year survival was 77.1%, while 5-years survival was 67.1%. During follow-up, there were 23 (10.7%) reinterventions involving the descending thoracic aorta - either thoracic endovascular aortic repair or open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. Among patients with ATAAD, short-term postoperative outcomes after TAR + bACP using the "arch first" approach are acceptable. Moreover, this operative strategy may furnish long-term durability, with a reasonably low reintervention rate and satisfactory overall survival.

Physiological occlusal force attenuates replacement root resorption of replanted teeth: an experimental animal study

BackgroundTooth avulsion represents the most severe form of dental trauma, necessitating tooth replantation as the primary treatment. However, the risk of replacement root resorption (RRR) poses a significant threat to tooth retention following replantation. This study preliminarily aimed to investigate the effect of physiological occlusal force on RRR after the replantation of avulsed teeth and to explore the potential underlying mechanisms.MethodsThirty-six 4-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent extraction and immediate replantation of their left maxillary molars. The rats were randomly divided into two major groups: the occluded (n = 18) group, where the opposite mandibular teeth were preserved; non-occluded (n = 18) group, where the opposite mandibular teeth were extracted. Within each major group, there were three subgroups corresponding to 7 days, 14 days, and 2 months, resulting in a total of six subgroups, (n = 6 per subgroup). The right maxillary first molars served as the normal control. Various periodontal characteristics were assessed using haematoxylin-eosin (H&E), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).ResultsHistological staining revealed that under occlusal force, the early stage (day 7) after tooth replantation mainly manifested as root surface resorption, especially in the non-occluded group, which gradually diminished over time. Cementum and periodontal ligament (PDL) repair was observed on day 14. Micro-CT analysis indicated a significant decrease in PDL width in the non-occluded group two months after replantation, consistent with the histological findings, signifying severe RRR in the non-occluded group.ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence that physiological occlusal force may attenuate osteoclastogenesis during the early stage of tooth replantation, thereby reducing the occurrence of RRR and promoting periodontal healing.

Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Aortic Root Replacement With and Without Valve Preservation

BackgroundWe compared the outcomes of aortic root replacement by composite valve grafts (CVG) and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) operations, with an emphasis on postoperative conduction block and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM). MethodsFrom 1997 to 2023, 1712 consecutive patients underwent ARR by VSRR (501 [29%]) or CVG (1211 [71%]) at a high-volume aortic center. ResultsPatients undergoing CVG were older (59 ± 14 vs 49 ± 14 years, P < .001), with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Compared with CVG, there were more women undergoing VSRR (17% vs. 13%, P = .042) and more patients with connective tissue disease (22% vs 7.3%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis found that the risk for PPM was higher after CVG compared with VSRR (6.5% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.23-7.69; P = .024). Other variables associated with PPM include older age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .006) preoperative renal impairment (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.24-5.6; P = .010), previous operation (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.29-5.62; P = .007), and bicuspid aortic valve (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 2.13-6.33; P < .001). Among the CVG population, patients who are at increased risk are especially those with some degree of aortic stenosis (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.18-3.61; P = .011). Patients who required PPM had no additive risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.47-2.17; P = .986); however, they were more likely to have reduced ejection fraction (29.3% vs 16%, P = .014). ConclusionsThe incidence of PPM after ARR is low, but rates were higher after CVG compared with VSRR.

Modeling of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation after aortic root replacement using a 3-dimensional artificial intelligence algorithm

ObjectiveAortic root replacement requires construction of a composite valve-graft and reimplantation of coronary arteries. This study assessed the feasibility of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation after aortic root replacement. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted on 74 consecutive patients who received a composite valve-graft at a single institution from 2019 to 2021. Forty patients had bioprosthetic valves with adequate postoperative gated computed tomographic angiography scans. Computational simulations of balloon and self-expanding transcatheter valve deployments were performed. The modeled coronary distances were compared with traditional, manually measured valve-to-coronary distances. ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference in the modeled versus manual measurements of valve to coronary distances for all patients regardless of valve type or coronary artery analyzed (P < .05). Most patients are low risk for coronary obstruction per 3-dimensional modeling, including those with a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm. Only 1 patient (2.5%) was at risk for coronary obstruction for the left coronary artery using a balloon valve. No other valve combination was considered high risk of coronary obstruction. Five patients (12.5%) were at risk for possible valve stent deformation at the outflow, due to angulation at the graft anastomosis. ConclusionsFollowing aortic root replacement, all patients were candidates for valve-in-valve procedure using 1 or both types of transcatheter heart valves. Self-expanding valves may be at higher risk for stent frame deformation at graft anastomotic lines and balloon-expandable valves may be at higher risk of coronary obstruction.

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Children and Adolescents: Experience and Outcomes in a Public Institution in Argentina

Background: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) with reimplantation technique is indicated in patients with aortic root aneurysm. We evaluated the mid-term outcomes of this surgical technique in children and adolescents in our institution. Methods: Retrospective study. Twenty-one patients who underwent VSARR surgery were included between July 2006 and July 2022. The relationship between baseline variables and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) was assessed. Results: The median age was 13 years. Seventeen patients had connective tissue disorders (3 with bicuspid aortic valve), 2 operated congenital heart disease, 1 isolated bicuspid aortic valve and 1 Turner syndrome. Thirteen patients had mild AR and 5 had moderate AR preoperatively. Three patients underwent early aortic replacement, 2 due to endocarditis and 1 due to severe acute AR. The median follow-up was 4.1 years. Of 17 patients at follow-up, 2 developed mild-moderate AR, 2 moderate AR and 3 severe AR. One of them underwent Bentall surgery. No association was found between the degree of preoperative AR or the presence of bicuspid aortic valve and the progression of postoperative AR. There was no association between the type of postoperative valve coaptation and the development of AR greater than mild at follow-up. Conclusions: VSARR with reimplantation is a feasible surgical technique with favorable mid-term outcomes and low reoperation rate in pediatric patients.

Redo Hemi-Cabrol Aortic Root Replacement with Hemi aortic arch repair

Redo Hemi-Cabrol Aortic Root Replacement with Hemi aortic arch repair

External aortic annuloplasty with a dedicated expansible ring improves outcomes in remodeling root repair compared with homemade Dacron ring

ObjectivesIn remodeling valve-sparing root replacement with external annuloplasty, we compare long-term outcomes of a calibrated expansible extra-aortic ring with a homemade Dacron ring. MethodsAll patients (2003-2020) operated for root aneurysm with/without aortic insufficiency (AI) were included. The standardized CAVIAAR (conservation aortique valvulaire dans les insuffisances aortiques et anévrysmes de la racine-Valve sparing in aortic insufficiencies and root aneurysms) technique was root remodeling and external annuloplasty ring with the EXTRA-AORTIC Ring or homemade Dacron ring. ResultsAmong 486 patients (age 52.3 ± 14.0 years) operated for root aneurysm, 375 (repair rate: 77.1%) underwent root remodeling with annuloplasty (extra-aortic ring, n = 289, vs Dacron ring, n = 86). At 10 years (median follow-up, 4.08 years’ interquartile range, 1.95-7.61), unmatched and matched analysis showed that patients with extra-aortic ring had greater survival, similar to the general population (93.3% vs 79.9%, P = .097), lower reoperation incidence (2.0% vs 9.7%, P = .0098), and lower AI grade >2 recurrence (1.9% vs 11.2%, P = .0042), compared with patients with a Dacron ring. Mixed-effect model showed that with extra-aortic ring annuloplasty, annular dilation over time (P = .0033) was prevented and, compared with the homemade Dacron ring, root expansibility was better preserved (3.22% vs 2.12%, P = .002) and mean transvalvular gradient was lower (6.58 mm Hg vs 7.94 mm Hg, P = .001). Tricuspid and bicuspid valves with extra-aortic ring had similar reoperation (4.3% vs 0.85%, P = .65) and AI grade >2 incidence (2.7% vs 1.2%, P = .61), expansibility (P = .29), and diameter (P = .47), whereas mean transvalvular gradient was lower for tricuspid valves (5.58 mm Hg vs 7.60 mm Hg, P = .004). ConclusionsValve-sparing root remodeling with calibrated expansible extra-aortic ring annuloplasty improves the outcomes of reoperation and recurrent AI compared with a homemade Dacron ring. It prevents dilation and maintains physiological root dynamics for durable valve repair.

Minimally invasive versus conventional methods for aortic root surgery: Choosing the right approach.

Partial upper sternotomy is preferred for isolated aortic valve replacement because of its optimal surgical visibility and favorable cosmetic outcomes; however, it is not commonly used for aortic root surgery, and the conventional median sternotomy is still the preferred method for most surgeons. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive approach (partial sternotomy [PS]) and conventional approach (median sternotomy [FS]) for aortic root surgery. Patients who underwent aortic root surgery at our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups. After propensity score matching, the conventional group included 156 patients and the minimally invasive group-57 patients. Bicuspid aortic valves were observed in 63 (40.4%) and 33 (57.9%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. Valve-sparing surgery was performed on 69 (44.2%) and 30 (52.6%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. The minimally invasive approach was beneficial in terms of blood loss during the first 24 h after surgery (p = 0.029) and postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.023). The survival rates and freedom from reoperation or severe aortic regurgitation after the David procedure were comparable between the standard and minimally invasive groups (p = 0.25; p = 0.66) at mid-term follow-up. A minimally invasive approach for aortic root surgery can be safely performed as the standard approach. Partial upper sternotomy has the advantage of lower blood loss in the early postoperative period and does not negatively affect the results of valve-sparing root replacement.