Root Repairs Research Articles

Poster 269: Radiographic Outcome of Meniscal Root Repairs: Evaluating Osteoarthritic Progression Over Two Years

Objectives: Root tears account for 10-21% of meniscal injuries, defined as radial tears occurring within 1 cm of the meniscal attachment horn. Menisci play a critical role in load transmission and shock absorption, with the goal of surgical intervention to retain knee functionality over time. While meniscal root repairs demonstrate better clinical outcomes to meniscectomies, total knee replacements, or non-surgical intervention, current literature suggests progression of knee osteoarthritis following repair. The purpose of this study is to evaluate osteoarthritic impacts, specific to joint space narrowing (JSN) and Kellgren Lawrence grades, through pre- and post-operative radiographs of root repair patients. We hypothesize root repair radiographs will demonstrate both anatomic narrowing of joint space and increased KL Grades over a 2-year follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate osteoarthritic impacts of meniscal root repairs by using standardized protocol to measure JSN and KL Grades through pre- and postoperative patient radiographs. Methods: Patients who underwent meniscal root repairs during the study period of 2012 to 2022 at our academic center were identified. Inclusion criteria included patients who received a weightbearing preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and/or 2-year postoperative radiograph. Joint space and KL scores, including evaluation of osteophytes, sclerosis, and definite deformity of boney ends, were assessed by two separate independent readers with protocol consistent with previously published grading scale literature. Results: Forty-nine patients (35 females and 12 males) with an average age of 47.7 (± 9.06) years and BMI of 32.73 (±6.75) underwent meniscal root repairs and proper imaging during the study period. Preliminary data indicates significant (p <.005) medial joint space narrowing across medial, lateral, and bilateral repairs from preoperative measurements (4.79 ± 0.7 mm) to 1-year postoperative (4.24 ± 0.7 mm), as well as 2-year postoperative (4.24± 1.0 mm). Over 2-year follow-up, 47.4% patients went on to hold the same KL grade, 44.7% patients increased by 1 grade, 7.9% patients increased by 2 grades, and two patients were converted to arthroplasty (i.e. 1 total knee, 1 unicompartmental). Overall, KL scores demonstrate an average 51.9% increase in pre-op grading (1.29 ± 0.4) to 2-year post-op grading (1.96 ± 0.29) respectively. Conclusions: Radiographic images of meniscal root repairs indicate mild progression of osteoarthritic knee characteristics over a 2-year follow-up. Quantified joint space narrowing was shown in most patients and over 50% had an increase in Kellgren Lawrence grade. Despite successful repair in most patients, osteoarthritic progression occurs in post patients.

Poster 344: The New "Terrible Triad": Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Concurrent Meniscal Lateral Root and Medial Ramp Repairs

Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to compare patient reported outcomes (PROMs) between isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR) and ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs and compare PROMs between different medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repair techniques. Methods: All patients with isolated (ISO) ACL reconstruction or ACL reconstruction with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. A final total of 42 ISO-ACL patients were matched based upon age, sex, and body mass index to 40 in the “terrible triad” (TT) cohorts. Outcome measures were obtained from 32 patients in the ISO cohort, and 38 patients in the TT cohort. The PROMs used for this study include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee, Cincinnati, Tegner, Lysholm, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) questionnaire forms. T tests and chi-square goodness of fit tests were used to compare the above PROMs both pre- and postoperatively within each cohort, and between cohorts and rates of revision or reoperation. Results: The preoperative and postoperative PROMs between patients in the isolated cohort and the triad cohort demonstrated no significant differences, except for the Physical category of the VR-12, in which the triad cohort had significantly higher results (p = 0.04) (Figure 1). Both the isolated cohort and the triad cohort reported significant differences between pre- and postoperative PROMs within their own cohorts. When comparing methods of surgery, including all-inside vs. inside-out for the medial meniscus repairs and tunnel versus no-tunnel for the lateral meniscus root repairs, no significant differences were found between postoperative PROMs. Additionally, no significant difference was found in revision or reoperative rates between the triad and isolated cohorts (p = 0.374) (Figure 2), the all-inside versus inside-out medial meniscus cohorts (p = 0.267), or the tunnel vs. no-tunnel lateral meniscus cohorts (p = 0.781). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in PROMs between isolated ACLR versus ACLR with concomitant medial meniscus ramp and lateral meniscus root repairs. While the complexity of the TT ACLR patients was more involved, PROMs and healing rates were similar and performing concurrent medial ramp and lateral root repairs at the time of ACLR should be considered.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Novel Re-Tensionable All-Suture Anchor

Background: Medial meniscal root repairs are devastating injuries that can cause long-term knee problems if not properly addressed. Some common issues when addressing these injuries surgically include the “bungee-cord” effect seen with implants that sit too far from the tibial plateau surface and loss of tension on the sutures after cycling of the knee after the repair. This video will discuss the presentation of a patient with a medial meniscal root repair treated with a novel technique to counteract these aforementioned issues. Indications: Based on the patient’s medial meniscal root tear and minimal arthritis seen on radiograph, he was indicated for a meniscal root repair to prevent meniscal extrusion and reinforce normal meniscal hoop stresses to limit progression of his arthritis. Technique Description: This technique uses a novel re-tensionable all-suture anchor through a transtibial tunnel with 2 repair sutures through the meniscal root that sits just below the tibial plateau, allowing the surgeon the ability to re-tension the implant after cycling the knee. Results: Arthroscopic repair of the medial meniscal root allowed the patient to return to his previous level of activity. Discussion/Conclusion: In this case, arthroscopic medial meniscal root repair can yield good results in patients to get them back to their previous level of activity while minimizing the chance of rapid arthritic progression that is typically seen with nonoperative management of these injuries. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Most Patients Older Than 40 Years of Age Who Underwent Meniscal Root Repair Presented With an Effusion, a Positive McMurray Test, and a Positive Hyperflexion Test

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to analyze the presenting symptoms and clinical exam findings of patients undergoing meniscal root repairs to aid physicians in diagnosing this injury. MethodsAll patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic meniscal root repair from 1/1/2016-9/1/2021 were identified. Patients under the age of 40 years were excluded. Clinical notes were reviewed for presenting symptoms and physical exam findings. Pre-operative radiographs were graded using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale for osteoarthritis. Root tears were graded using the radiographic criteria of Chung et al. and articular cartilage injury was graded using a validated system, AMADEUS (mean total Area Measurement And Depth & Underlying Structures). Results221 patients met inclusion criteria. 65.6% of patients reported that their pain began following an acute injury, with 39.4% of patients reporting a “pop”. On exam, an effusion was present in 71% of knees. McMurray test was reported positive in 85.5% and a positive hyperflexion test in 53.8% of knees. 49.5% of knees were graded KL 1. 154 had medial root tears, 10 had lateral root tears, and 24 suffered both root tears. 44.1% of tears occurred at the midsubstance of the root, with 28.0% occurring at the enthesis and 28.0% occurring at the root-posterior horn junction. The mean AMADEUS score was 94.4 ± 11.4. ConclusionWhile a majority of patients reported pain began following acute injury, less than half reported hearing a “pop”. When evaluating patients, an effusion, positive McMurray test, and positive hyperflexion test was present in the majority of meniscal root tears. Level of EvidenceLevel IV Diagnostic case series

Revision Transtibial Medial Meniscal Root Repair With Concomitant Medial Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy

Background: Complete meniscal root tears disrupt dispersion of axial loading forces through hoop stresses. This increases point-loading on tibiofemoral cartilage and leads to chondromalacia and accelerated osteoarthritis (OA). Posterior root tears may be treated successfully with a transtibial pullout repair. Varus malalignment also leads to increased medial compartment pressures, increasing the risk of early OA and putting increased stress on the meniscus and stabilizing knee ligaments. In particular, revision medial meniscal root repairs without correction of varus malalignment are at increased risk of failure. Genu varum may be corrected with a medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (OW PTO). Indications: Meniscal root repairs are indicated for acute or chronic tears in active patients with healthy cartilage. OW PTO is indicated for varus malalignment in ambulatory patients with healthy cartilage, or who are at risk for failure of meniscal or ligamentous procedures. Technique Description: After exposure of the osteotomy site, arthroscopy is performed through the incision and the revision posterior meniscus root repair is performed via a double-tunnel transtibial pullout technique. The positioning of these tunnels is modified superiorly so as to not cross the planned osteotomy site. The osteotomy is then performed by drilling 2 guide pins under fluoroscopy to delineate the plane of the cut. An OW plate is placed, and the root repair is tensioned last. Results: Double-tunnel transtibial pullout repairs increase meniscal fixation contact surface and have been shown to be biomechanically superior to all-inside fixation techniques. Medial OW PTO restores knee alignment and reduces supra-anatomic stresses in the medial compartment, additionally decreasing the risk of a revision medial meniscus repair failure. Discussion: Biomechanical studies have shown that meniscal root tears are functionally equivalent to complete meniscectomy. Varus malalignment increases the risk of medial meniscal tears, and reduces the risk of a successful long-term repair. We describe a technique for a revision transosseous posterior root repair with concomitant proximal tibial osteotomy, with discussion of surgical pearls and pitfalls. This technique restores anatomic position and native function of the medial meniscus while correcting tibiofemoral malalignment that could jeopardize the repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form.

Poster 134: Biomechanical Analysis of Meniscotibial Ligament Tenodesis to Treat Meniscal Extrusion in the Setting of Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Repair

Poster 134: Biomechanical Analysis of Meniscotibial Ligament Tenodesis to Treat Meniscal Extrusion in the Setting of Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Repair

Poster 239: Advanced Patellofemoral Chondromalacia Does Not Affect Outcomes After Meniscal Root Repair

Objectives: Meniscal root tears have been shown to accelerate cartilage breakdown and increase the risk of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) if left unaddressed. Unfortunately, many patients with meniscal root tears already have associated chondromalacia which can impact surgical outcomes. The presence of advanced chondromalacia in the medial or lateral compartmentsof the knee is a known contraindication to performing meniscal root repair; however, the effect of advanced patellofemoral chondromalacia on meniscal root outcomes is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of meniscal root repair in patients with and without advanced patellofemoral chondromalacia (PFC). Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing meniscal root repair by a single surgeon was conducted between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients were included if they had undergone an isolated posterior medial or lateral meniscal root repair. The meniscal root repair was performed using a transtibial suture technique. Patients were placed into one of two groups depending on the amount of patellofemoral chondromalacia present at the time of surgery. Patients with Outerbridge grade 0-2 were placed in the Minimal Patellofemoral Chondromalacia (MPFC) Group. Patients with Outerbridge 3-4 changes found the time of surgery were placed in the Patellofemoral Chondromalacia (PFC) Group. Patients with Outerbridge 3-4 changes found in the medial or lateral compartment were excluded from the study. Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form were collected preoperatively, 6,12 and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes followed included recurrent meniscal tear, conversion to total knee arthroplasty, knee arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia/lysis of adhesions and infection. PASS and MCID were determined using data on meniscal repairs in other literature. Continuous data was compared using two-tailed student-T test while categorical data was compared utilizing chi-square testing. Results: A total of 27 patients made up the PFC group and 54 in the MPFC group. There was no difference between the groups with regards to age, sex, BMI or laterality of the procedure. The PFC group had 26 medial and 1 lateral meniscal root repairs. The MPFC group had 51 medial and 3 lateral repairs. The average Outerbridge score of the patella for the PFC group was 3.2 compared to 1.8 in the MPFC group (p<.001). The Outerbridge score for the trochlea in each group was 3.4 vs. 1.6 for the PFC and MPFC groups respectively (p<.001). No difference was identified between the Outerbridge score for the medial compartment for the PFC and MPFC groups (1.48 vs 1.46 respectively) or the lateral compartments (0.48 vs. 0.61 respectively). Lysholm and IKDC scores rose significantly over the pre- operative value at all time points in the study for both groups. No difference was seen between the two groups for the Lysholm or IKDC scores at any timepoint during study. PASS rates for IKDC between the two groups were similar with 6,12 and 24-month PASS rates being 66.7%, 87.5% and 81.4% respectively for the PFC group and 62.9%, 77.8% and 85.2% for the MPFC group. There was also no difference between the groups with regards to the percentage of patients reaching MCID for IKDC. The PFC group showed the percentage of patients reaching MCID to be 81.5%, 100% and 92.6% at the 6,12, and 24 month time points respectively while the MPFC group showed the percentage of patients reaching MCID to be 75.9%, 88.9% and 94.4% at the 6,12 and 24 month postoperative time points respectively. There was 1 (3.7%) recurrent tear in the PFC group and 3 (5.6%) in the MPFC group (p=.72). One patient (3.7%) in the PFC and none of the MPFC group were converted to TKA by the 2-year follow up (p=.15). Each group had 1 patient develop arthrofibrosis requiring MUA/LOA. There were no infections in the PFC group and one in the MPFC group which was a superficial wound infection that resolved after a course of oral antibiotics. Conclusions: In our series, the presence of advanced patellofemoral chondromalacia did not lead to inferior short-term outcomes in patients undergoing meniscal root repair compared to patients without patellofemoral chondromalacia. IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between the PFC and MPFC group at all time points while scores for both groups were significantly higher than preoperative levels at all time points. The ability to reach MCID and PASS for IKDC was not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, there was not a significant difference between the two groups in the number of recurrent tears, conversion to total knee arthroplasty or complications identified. Our results show meniscal root repair can be performed in patients with severe patellofemoral chondromalacia with similar results as patients undergoing root repair without severe patellofemoral chondromalacia. Patellofemoral chondromalacia should not be considered a contraindication to meniscal root repair.

A Systematic Review of Adverse Events and Complications After Isolated Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repairs

Background: Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is not without potential complications. Purpose: To evaluate the reported incidence of complications and adverse events after isolated MMPR repair. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases with the following search terms combined with Boolean operators: “meniscus,”“root,” and “repair.” Inclusion criteria consisted of level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English or English-language translation reporting complications and adverse events after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repairs. The overall incidence of specific complications was estimated from the pooled sample of the included studies. Results: Eleven studies with a total pooled sample of 442 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 58.1 years, while the mean final follow-up time was 37.2 months (range, 12-84.8 months). The overall incidence of complications was 9.7% (n = 43/442), with the most commonly reported complication being progressive degenerative changes within the knee (10.4%; n = 25/240; n = 5 studies). A total of 1.25% (n = 3/240) of patients who experienced degenerative changes required conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Repair failures were reported in 3.1% (n = 10/327; n = 8 studies) of patients. Conclusion: Repairing MMPR tears is critical in preventing accelerated progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients without significant knee osteoarthritis preoperatively. While this repair is still recommended and necessary in appropriate patients, this review found that the incidence of complications after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repair was 9.7%, primarily involving the presence of progressive degeneration, while repair failure was reported in 3% of patients.

Posterior Horn Lateral Meniscal Root Repair Via Double-Tunnel Transtibial Pullout With Meniscocapsular Release

Background: Lateral meniscal root tears often occur in the acute setting in concert with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Severe changes in tibiofemoral biomechanics and joint degeneration are encountered when these injuries are either unrecognized or are treated with meniscectomy; therefore, meniscal root surgical repair is now preferred for longer-term benefits. The most common repair techniques include side-to-side and transtibial pull-out repair, which may be performed via single or double transtibial tunnel techniques. Indications: The primary indication for lateral meniscal root repair with double transtibial tunnels is suspicion for a lateral meniscal root tear based upon injury mechanism, physical examination findings, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and confirmation with diagnostic arthroscopy. Technique Description: The root attachment site is decorticated. Adhesions that cause lateral meniscal root retraction are arthroscopically released. Two separate transtibial tunnels are drilled 5 mm apart from the anterolateral tibia, entering the anterolateral tibia distal to Gerdy’s tubercle and entering the joint at the decorticated lateral root attachment site. Two suture tapes are passed through the torn lateral meniscal root in a vertical mattress configuration and shuttled with a passing suture through the tibial tunnels. The suture tapes are tied over a surgical button on the anterolateral tibia with the knee flexed to approximately 90° while the repair is viewed arthroscopically. Results: Lateral meniscal root repairs are safe and have very low reoperation rates. It has been reported that the transtibial pullout repair technique of the lateral meniscus significantly decreases lateral meniscus extrusion compared with other repair techniques in patients with combined ACL reconstruction. Zhuo et al also reported significantly improved postoperative clinical outcomes compared with the preoperative state in patients who underwent pullout repair for posterior lateral meniscal root avulsion tears. Discussion/Conclusion: The biomechanical and clinical evidence supports concomitant lateral meniscal root repair in the setting of concurrent ACL injury, and no studies to date have demonstrated a clear harm associated with this procedure. In addition, failure to repair the lateral meniscal root places supraphysiologic loads on the ACL graft and may increase the risk of graft failure. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy With Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair

Background: Valgus malalignment leads to excessive loading of the lateral compartment and has been associated with lateral compartment meniscal injuries and early-onset knee osteoarthritis. Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is a treatment option that allows correction of the mechanical access to offload the lateral compartment. Lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy and medial meniscal root repairs are both aimed to address the pathologic biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint and when successful can delay or even prevent progression to end-stage osteoarthritic changes in the lateral and medial compartment, respectively. Indications: Distal femoral osteotomy is indicated for patients with normal metabolic bone health and valgus malalignment who may present with concurrent lateral meniscal injury, symptomatic lateral compartment arthritis, or a chronic medial collateral ligament tear/laxity. Technique Description: Long-leg alignment radiographs and preoperative magnetic resonance images are required to evaluate the degree of mechanical access deviation and to evaluate for soft tissue injury, as there is often concomitant lateral meniscal or cartilage pathology present. This technique demonstrates the optimal order of surgical steps for DFO with a concurrent medial meniscal root repair. The senior author’s preferred order is to first perform the open lateral approach and expose the lateral cortex for the placement of plate prior to arthroscopic work and excess fluid extravasation. Intra-articular work is then performed with a diagnostic arthroscopy followed by medial meniscal root repair. Finally, the osteotomy and subsequent internal fixation are performed. Results: The literature on opening-wedge DFO outcomes is heterogeneous, with variable rates of successful outcomes and complications. Saithna et al reported that International Knee Documentation Committee and the pain subdomain of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores significantly improved postoperatively following lateral opening-wedge DFOs in patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis. The 10-year success rate of varus-producing DFO has been reported to be 64% to 85%. Discussion: We describe a technique for correction of a valgus deformity with opening-wedge DFO and concurrent meniscal root repair. This surgical technique effectively restores the native femoral and tibial axis with appropriate load distribution and also concurrently restores the appropriate function of the medial meniscus which allows axial force dispersion via hoop stresses for the medial compartment. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Concomitant Medial and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Horn Root Repair With ACL Reconstruction Using Trans-Tibial Tunnel Technique

Concomitant medial meniscus posterior horn root tears and lateral meniscus posterior horn root tears are rare in occurrence. There is limited literature on the simultaneous repair of medial and lateral meniscus root tears, with ACL reconstruction. We discuss management of concomitant medial meniscus posterior horn root tear (MMPHRT), lateral meniscus posterior horn root tear (LMPHRT), and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. We highlight the surgical technique in which we perform a repair of both medial and lateral meniscus posterior horn root repairs with ACL reconstruction. We explain the sequence of such a repair to avoid tunnel coalescence.

Preoperative assessment of the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repair.

The aim of this study was to assess predictors of technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs (MIARR) performed through J-shaped mini-sternotomies in patients with aortic root aneurysm. This study included 49 patients with aortic root aneurysm who underwent MIARR via an upper median J-shaped mini-sternotomy between January 2017 and April 2020. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images synchronised with electrocardiography were mandatory for inclusion. Predictors of technical complexity were identified, and a scoring system was created. The correlation between technical complexity and intraoperative/postoperative parameters was explored. There was a significant association between technical complexity and increased procedure time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.45, P=0.001), blood loss (Spearmen's ρ=-0.384, P=0.006), cardiopulmonary bypass time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.301, P=0.035), and postoperative bleeding (Spearmen's ρ=-0.265, P=0.066). The anatomical aorta-sternal relationship (distance of >22.1 mm in the axial plane between the midline of the sternotomy plane and the left coronary), distance between the sternal notch and the aortic valve annulus (>14.5 cm in the sagittal plane), distance between the skin and the left coronary artery (>9.53 cm in the axial plane), obesity (Body Mass Index >30), and-diameter at the brachiocephalic trunk level (>37 mm), were strongly associated with procedural complexity. Overall test accuracy was 75.5%, sensitivity was 73.1%, and specificity 78.3%. Finally, we created an online calculator that surgeons can use to determine the probability of a technically difficult of MIARR based on these factors. This novel scoring system can be used to assess the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs and to aid in preoperative planning.

Transtibial Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Improves Contact Biomechanics in Pediatric Cadavers

A paucity of data exists on the treatment of pediatric lateral meniscus root tears (LMPRTs). This study aims to characterize the biomechanics of the lateral knee joint in pediatric cadavers following LMPRT and root repair. Our hypotheses were: (1) compared with the intact state, LMPRT would be associated with decreased contact area; (2) compared with the intact state, LMPRT would be associated with increased contact pressures; and (3) compared with LMPRT, root repair would restore contact area and pressures toward intact meniscus values. Eight cadaver knees (ages 8-12 years) underwent contact area and pressure testing of the lateral compartment. Tekscan pressure mapping sensors covering the tibial plateau were inserted underneath the lateral meniscus. Appropriate pressure load equivalents were applied by a robot at degrees of flexion: 0, 30, 60. Three meniscus conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) complete root tear, and (3) repaired root tear. Root repairs were performed with transtibial pullout sutures. Statistical analysis was performed. Root tear significantly decreased mean contact area at 30° (P= .0279) and 60° (P= .0397). Root repair increased mean contact area and did not significantly differ from intact states. Differences in contact pressures between meniscus states were not statistically significant. Relative to the intact state. the greatest increase in contact pressures occurred between 0° and 30°. Root repair decreased mean contact pressures at 0° and 30°. At 60°, mean contact pressures of the repair state were closer in magnitude to the tear state than the intact state. Conclusions: LMPRT decreases contact area and increases contact pressures in the lateral knee compartment. Repair of LMPRT improves tibiofemoral contact area at high (>30°) degrees of flexion and contact pressures at low (<30°) degrees of flexion. Transosseous pullout repair is a clinically validated treatment for LMPRT. This study provides baseline biomechanics data of transtibial pullout repair of pediatric LMPRTs.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Meniscal Root Repair: A Case Series.

This study aimed to describe the demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent meniscal root repair at a single, large academic institution. Patients who underwent meniscal root repair between January 2011 and April 2015 were identified. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and intraoperative findings of medial femoral condyle chondromalacia and other concomitant pathology were retrospectively recorded. Enrolled patients returned to clinic for prospectively collected International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective forms, knee radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 25 root injuries (23 patients) were included in the final analysis. Majority of root injuries were medial menisci (68%) and repaired using transosseous pull-out technique (80%). Most patients (65%) were male, relatively young (median age = 37 years), overweight (median body mass index [BMI] = 26 kg/m2), and reported a traumatic event associated with their injury (60%). Also, 36% (9/25) of root repairs were performed concomitantly with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; 100% (8/8) lateral meniscal root injuries were associated with a concomitant ACL injury compared with 6% (1/17) of medial root injuries. Overall, 53% (9/17) of medial meniscal root repairs were performed in the setting of high-grade (Outerbridge's grade III/IV) chondral pathology of the ipsilateral femoral condyle. Median follow-up was 16 months. The Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic scale progressed in two knees that underwent meniscal root repair based on comparison of preoperative to follow-up radiographs. MRI showed 88% (22/25) of meniscal roots had completely healed, 6% (1/17) of the medial root repairs showed evidence of extrusion, and 44% (11/25) of repairs were associated with progressive chondromalacia. All patients had normal or near normal IKDC objective scores at time of follow-up. Surgeons should have a high suspicion for concomitant ACL injuries in the setting of lateral meniscal root tears, and be wary of concomitant high-grade chondral damage in the setting of medial meniscal root tears. Most meniscal root repairs appeared completely healed with low rates of medial meniscal extrusion on MRI at short-term follow-up, despite a high rate of chondromalacia progression. Present study is a large case series with prospective follow-up and reflects level of evidence IV.

Ultrasound guided arthroscopic meniscus surgery.

Ultrasound is a useful adjunctive intra-operative imaging modality for soft tissue pathologies. It is readily available in the operating theater and has the distinct advantage of being more portable than an MRI, with no harmful radiation. It is especially useful for determining if any extra articular cysts have been decompressed through arthroscopic surgery, if a parameniscal cyst has been removed completely or if extrusion has been reduced adequately in a meniscus root repair. In our series, intra-operative ultrasound was used for two cases of medial meniscus horizontal tear with meniscus cyst excision, one case of lateral parameniscal cyst without a communicating tear, and five cases of meniscus root repairs. Ultrasound has the potential to be an important intra-operative diagnostic modality not only in diagnosing pathologies but also accurately localizing the soft tissue pathology, which is critical in arthroscopic surgery where the incisions are small. It also has the added advantage of guiding portal placements, especially in areas where there are neurovascular structures, to avoid injuring them. However, training in its effective use by the surgeon is important.

Paper 17: Optimal Tibial Tunnel Placement for Medial and Lateral Meniscal Root Repair in the Setting of Multiligament Reconstructions of the Knee

Objectives:Although the risk of tibial tunnel convergence in the setting of multiligament reconstruction has been reported in the literature, the risk of tunnel convergence in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and medial and lateral meniscal root repair has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of tunnel convergence and to determine optimal tunnel placement for ACL and PCL reconstruction performed in conjunction with posterior medial and lateral meniscal root repairs in the proximal tibia.Methods:Three-dimensional tibial models were created using computed tomography scans of twenty cadaveric specimens. After determining optimal tunnel entry and exit points for ACL and PCL reconstructions, and medial and lateral meniscal root repair on the models, Mimics software was used to create root tunnels. The meniscal root repair tunnels were then re-oriented to be parallel to the ACL tunnel. The initial and re-oriented configurations are illustrated in Figure 1. Tunnel convergence risk was analyzed with single and double tunnel techniques in both case scenarios.Results:There were no cases of convergence between the ACL and medial meniscal root tunnels in any of the configurations. The greatest distance between the tunnels was achieved with the single tunnel technique in parallel orientation (12.09 ± 2.78 mm). All specimens demonstrated convergence between the ACL and lateral meniscal root tunnels when the sagittal plane entry was not taken into consideration and only the anatomic root attachment was accounted for, for single and double tunnel techniques, but no convergence was seen between these tunnels with the parallel orientation in the sagittal plane. Figure 2 illustrates the reduction in the convergence risk when the meniscal root tunnels are reoriented as parallel to the ACL tunnel. There were no cases of convergence between the PCL and medial meniscal root tunnels in the original orientation, but 2/20 specimens demonstrated convergence in the parallel orientation with the double tunnel technique and no cases of convergence in the single tunnel technique. The PCL and lateral meniscal root tunnels did not demonstrate convergence in any configuration. Table 1 demonstrates the mean, minimum and maximum distances of each tunnel configuration as well as the number of cases where the distance between tunnels was <2mm. A summary of the preferred tunnel configurations for each setting, ranked by greatest tunnel distance conferred and cases of convergence, is reported in Table 2.Conclusions:There is a high risk of convergence between ACL and posterior meniscus root tunnels. Re-orienting meniscal root tunnels parallel to ACL tunnels may help reduce this risk. When PCL reconstruction is performed with ACL reconstruction and medial and lateral meniscal root repair, the single tunnel root repair technique may pose less risk over the double tunnel technique to prevent tunnel convergence between the meniscal root repair and PCL tunnels in the tibia.Figure 1. Illustration of the reconstruction of the tunnels. (A) Initial orientation where the meniscal root tunnels’ entry points on the anteromedial aspect of the tibia were created above the ACL tunnel. (B) The meniscal root tunnels re-orientated and were placed parallel to that of the ACL and aimed to exit at the anatomic attachment of the posterior roots of the meniscus. (Gold guide for the creation of the ACL tunnel and silver guide for the creation of the meniscal root tunnel)

All-Inside Repair of a Radial Lateral Meniscal Root Tear With an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Background: Root tears are functionally compromising injuries that require an anatomic repair for functional restoration of native joint mechanics. Posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures as lateral root tears contribute to anterolateral rotational instability. Two-tunnel transtibial root repair allows for root repair with superior pullout strength and can be combined with ACL reconstruction to treat this injury pattern. Indications: Two-tunnel transtibial root repair is indicated in active patients with meniscal root tears that have low-grade chondromalacia (grade II or less). It is contraindicated in patients with advanced degenerative changes (grade III-IV), severe mal-alignment, and extrusion related to advanced degenerative changes; those who cannot complete postoperative rehabilitation; and patients with significant medical comorbidities. Technique Description: After repairing a vertical horn tear of the posterior medial meniscus, a vertical tear of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus was observed. Following preparation of the anatomic footprint, 2 transtibial tunnels were drilled and sutures were passed and secured using a surgical button over the anterior tibial cortex. Horizontal repair of the tear was then performed using 2 all-inside devices. Subsequently, an ACL reconstruction was performed. Results: At 11 months postoperative, the patient has continued to progress as expected. She was able to ambulate without pain, had a symmetric and balanced gait, and was able to return to running. Discussion/Conclusion: Lateral meniscal root repairs using 2 transtibial tunnels and concomitant ACL reconstruction have yielded good and reliable clinical outcomes with low failure rates and low rates of revision surgery.

Optimal Tibial Tunnel Placement for Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Repair on the Anteromedial Tibia in the Setting of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee

Background: Although the risk of tibial tunnel convergence in the setting of multiligamentous reconstruction has been reported in the literature, the risk of tunnel convergence in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial and lateral meniscus root repair has not been defined. Purpose: To examine the risk of tunnel convergence and to determine optimal tunnel placement for ACL and PCL reconstruction performed in conjunction with posterior medial and lateral meniscus root repairs on the anteromedial proximal tibia. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) tibial models were created using computed tomography scans of 20 cadaveric specimens. After determining optimal tunnel entry and exit points for ACL and PCL reconstructions, and medial and lateral meniscus root reattachment to the anatomic footprints, we used image processing software to create root tunnels over the anteromedial tibia on the tibial models. ACL and PCL tunnels were kept constant. The meniscus root repair tunnels were then reoriented to match the angle of the ACL tunnel, making both tunnels parallel in the sagittal plane. Tunnel convergence risk was analyzed by identifying the shortest 3D distance between tunnel axes and subtracting the radius of each tunnel from this distance for single- and double-tunnel repair techniques in both case scenarios. Results: All specimens demonstrated convergence between the ACL and lateral meniscus root tunnels when the root tunnel’s entry was created proximal to the ACL tunnel’s entry for single- and double-tunnel techniques, but no convergence was seen between these tunnels using the parallel orientation in the sagittal plane. There were no cases of convergence between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels in any of the configurations. The greatest distance between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels was achieved using the single-tunnel technique in parallel orientation (12.1 ± 2.8 mm). There were no cases of convergence between the PCL and medial meniscus root tunnels in the original orientation; however, 2 of 20 specimens demonstrated convergence using the parallel orientation with the double-tunnel technique, and there were no cases of convergence using the single-tunnel technique. The PCL and lateral meniscus root tunnels did not demonstrate convergence in any configuration. Conclusion: There was a high risk of convergence between ACL and posterior meniscus root tunnels when all the tunnels were created on the anteromedial tibia. Reorienting meniscus root tunnels parallel to ACL tunnels may help reduce this risk. There is increased risk of tunnel convergence with root repairs in cases of bicruciate reconstructions, and therefore a double-tunnel root repair technique should be used with caution. Clinical Relevance: To avoid tibial tunnel convergence when performing ACL and PCL reconstruction with medial and lateral meniscus root repair, surgeons should reorient the meniscus root repair tunnels to be parallel on the sagittal plane to the ACL tunnel to decrease the risk of convergence. In cases of bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of the double-tunnel technique requires caution to avoid convergence risk with the PCL tunnel.

Prospective Consecutive Clinical Outcomes After Transtibial Root Repair for Posterior Meniscal Root Tears: A Multicenter Study.

Background:Prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes after posterior meniscal root repair utilizing a transtibial pullout technique is limited, and factors that may contribute to outcomes are unclear.Hypothesis:It was hypothesized that there would be an overall significant improvement in outcomes after root repair and that differences in clinical outcomes would correlate with age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and meniscal extrusion.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Consecutive patients undergoing transtibial medial or lateral meniscal root repair were enrolled prospectively at 2 orthopaedic centers between March 2017 and January 2019. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained to assess for meniscal healing, quantification of extrusion, articular cartilage grade, and subchondral bone changes. Patient-reported outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were then subdivided by clinical and demographic characteristics to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes.Results:Included were 45 patients (29 female, 16 male; mean age, 42.3 ± 12.9 years; mean BMI, 31.6 kg/m2) who underwent 47 meniscal root repairs (29 medial and 16 lateral; 2 had both). Significant improvements at 2-year follow-up were seen in IKDC score (41.1 vs 78.4; P < .001), Tegner activity level (3 vs 4; P < .001), and VAS pain (2.8 vs 0.7; P < .001). BMI, preoperative malalignment, cartilage status, and progressive meniscus extrusion (Δ = 0.7 mm) did not have a negative impact on IKDC and Tegner scores 2 years postoperatively. Age greater than or equal to 50 years and extrusion pre- and postoperatively were associated with decreased Tegner scores. Progressive meniscal extrusion was associated with a decreased overall improvement in Tegner scores.Conclusion:Transtibial root repair for medial and lateral posterior meniscal root tears demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Increased age, increased BMI, cartilage status, and meniscal extrusion did not have a negative impact on short-term functional outcomes (IKDC), but age greater than or equal to 50 years and extrusion negatively influenced patient activity level (Tegner).Registration:NCT03037242 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Loosening of Posteromedial Meniscal Root Repairs Affects Knee Mechanics: A Finite Element Study.

Meniscal root repairs are susceptible to unrecoverable loosening that may displace the meniscus from the initial position reduced during surgery. Despite this, the effects of a loosened meniscal root repair on knee mechanics are unknown. We hypothesized that anatomic root repairs without loosening would restore knee mechanics to the intact condition better than loosened anatomic root repairs, but that loosened repairs would restore mechanics better than untreated meniscal root tears. Finite element knee models were used to evaluate changes in cartilage and meniscus mechanics due to repair loosening. The mechanical response from loosened anatomic root repairs was compared to anatomic repairs without loosening and untreated root tears. All conditions were evaluated at three flexion angles, 0 deg, 30 deg, and 60 deg, and a compressive force of 1000 N to simulate return-to-activity loading. The two-simple suture method was represented within the models to simulate posteromedial meniscal root repairs and the loosening of repairs was derived from previous biomechanical experimental data. Loosening decreased hoop stresses throughout the meniscus, increased posterior extrusion, and shifted loading through the meniscus-cartilage region to the cartilage-cartilage region compared to the anatomic root repair without loosening. Despite differences between repairs and loosened repairs, the changes from loosened repairs more closely resembled the anatomic repair without loosening than the untreated root repair condition. Therefore, meniscal root repairs are susceptible to loosening that will prevent a successful initial repair from remaining in the intended position and will alter cartilage and meniscus mechanics, although repairs that loosen appear better than leaving tears untreated.