Root Aneurysm Research Articles

Reply: Reimplantation should be the gold standard to treat the regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve.

Reply: Reimplantation should be the gold standard to treat the regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve.

Aortic valve reimplantation in patients with connective tissue syndromes: A 15-year follow-up.

The goal of this study was to analyse early- and long-term outcomes of aortic valve reimplantation (David operation) in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. This is a retrospective observational analysis using data from a prospectively maintained surgical database from March 2004 to April 2021. Patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease were included in the study. A total of 157 patients with aortic root aneurysm with the diagnosis of heritable thoracic aortic disease received the David procedure. Marfan syndrome was found in 143 (91.1%) patients, Loeys-Dietz in 13 and Ehler-Danlos in 1 patient. The median age was 35.0 (IQR: 17.5) years and the median ascending aorta diameter in the Valsalva sinuses was 48 mm (IQR: 4). A Valsalva graft was used in 8 patients; the David V technique was performed in the rest of the cases. The median follow-up time was 7.3 years [standard deviation: 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.12-8.05]. Only 2 patients died during the follow-up period. The overall survival was 99% (95% CI: 95%; 99%); 98% (95% CI: 92%; 99%); and 98% (95% CI: 92%; 99%) at 5, 10 and 15 years. Freedom from significant aortic regurgitation (AR> II), reintervention and postoperative type-B dissection was 90% (95% CI: 77%; 95%), 96% (95% CI: 91%; 99%) and 87% (95% CI: 68%; 95%) at 15 years, respectively. No differences were found in any outcome between Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. No statistically significant differences in survival were found when we compared expected gender- and age-specific population survival values. The David operation is an excellent option for the treatment of patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease and dilatated aortic root. Surgical expertise in referral centres is essential to achieve the best long-term results.

David Procedure for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in a Marfan Syndrome Patient

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) is an established treatment method for aortic root dilatation and aortic valve insufficiency (AI). It was developed to restore the aortic valve functions in patients of aortic root aneurysms with morphologically normal aortic valve. We hereby present a case of 67 years, male, with aortic root aneurysm and severe aortic regurgitation who was treated successfully by David’s procedure for valve sparing aortic root replacement technique. Cardiovasc j 2022; 14(2): 185-190

Valve-sparing versus valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to valve-replacing aortic root replacement (VRARR) with valved-conduits based on recent guidelines for clinical practice. This study investigated outcomes of these two procedures in patients with nonstenotic valves. Between January 7, 2007 and June 30, 2019, 475 patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis underwent VSARR (151) or VRARR (324) techniques. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to alleviate confounding. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, 8-year survival and reoperation, aortic regurgitation, and valve gradients. PSM created 69 pairs of patients with a mean age 52 ± 13 years (10.1% Marfan syndrome, 34.8% bicuspid aortic valve). There was no statistically significant difference in major perioperative morbidity or 30-day mortality (0% VSARR vs.1.4% VRARR; p = 0.316). Overall survival was significantly higher (p = 0.025) in the VSARR group versus the VRARR group (8-year estimates 100% vs. 88.9%, respectively), while freedom from valve reoperation was similar (p = 0.97, 8-year estimates 90.9% vs. 96.7%, respectively). Freedom from > moderate-severe AR was not significantly different (p = 0.08, 8-year estimates 90.0% VSARR group vs. 100% VRARR), but mean valve gradients at last follow-up were better in the VSARR group (5.9 vs. 13.2 mmHg, p < 0.001). VSARR is a safe operation in patients with aortic root aneurysm and nonstenotic aortic valves in the hands of experienced surgeons. Freedom from reoperation is similar and the mode of aortic valve failure differs between the two groups.

Differences in Aortic Histopathology in Patients Undergoing Valve Reimplantation Surgery for Various Clinical Syndromes.

Objectives The study aims to investigate aortic histopathologic differences among patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation, suggest different mechanisms of aortic root aneurysm pathogenesis, and identify factors associated with long-term success of reimplantation. Methods From 2006 to 2017, 568 adults who underwent reimplantation for repair of aortic root aneurysm, including patients with tricuspid aortic valves with no connective tissue disease (TAV/NoCTD, n = 314/568; 55.3%), bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs, n = 86/568; 15.1%), or connective tissue disease (CTD, n = 177/568; 31.2%), were compiled into three comparison groups. Patients with both BAV and CTD ( n = 9/568; 1.6%) were omitted to increase study power. Patient records were analyzed retrospectively, focusing on pathology reports, which were available for 98.42% of patients, and were classified based on their descriptions of aortic tissue samples, primarily from the noncoronary sinus. Mean follow-up time available for patients was 2.97 years. Results Aortitis, medial fibrosis, and smooth muscle loss were more common histopathologic findings in patients with TAV/NoCTD than in patients with BAV and CTD ( p < 0.05). Cystic medial degeneration was most often found in patients with CTD, then TAV/NoCTD, and least in BAV ( p < 0.01). Increases in mucopolysaccharides were found more often in the BAV group than in the TAV/NoCTD and CTD groups ( p < 0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of elastic laminae fragmentation/loss across these three groups. Among all patients, 1.97% ( n = 11/559) had an unplanned reintervention on the aortic valve after reimplantation, but no significant demographic or histopathologic differences were identified. Conclusion Despite some common histopathologic features among patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation, there were enough distinguishing features among aortic tissue samples of TAV/NoCTD, BAV, and CTD patients to suggest that these groups develop root aneurysms by different mechanisms. No histopathologic features were able to predict the need for late reintervention on the aortic valve.

Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Adult Aortic Surgery

<h3>Purpose</h3> Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been used for post-cardiotomy shock (PCS). Its application to post-aortic surgical patients is challenging. We report our experience of VA-ECMO support for PCS following aortic surgery. <h3>Methods</h3> A total of 126 adult patients required VA-ECMO for PCS from Jan 2007 to Feb 2017. Of this group, 27 patients underwent aortic surgery (Group AO). Outcomes were examined, as well as risk factors for mortality, and this group was compared to those requiring ECMO for PCS following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or valve procedures (Group CV, n=65). <h3>Results</h3> Fifteen patients had acute type A aortic dissection and 6 had ascending and/or root aneurysm. Root replacement was performed in 13 patients, ascending in 11, and arch replacement 2, with concomitant procedures in 17 patients. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 280±125 minutes and mean aortic cross-clamp time was 153±79 minutes. In-hospital mortality was 51.8%. Significant bleeding, new hemodialysis requirement, and neurological complications occurred in 59%, 37%, and 11% of patients, respectively. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in logistic regression analysis included coronary artery disease (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.3-60.3, p=0.034), aortic cross-clamp time >150 minutes (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.2-41.1, p=0.048), lactate > 6 mg/dL at 24 hours post-ECMO initiation (OR 12.0, 95% CI 1.6-255.6, p=0.037) and bleeding complication (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.2-37, p=0.041). Compared to Group CV, Group AO had significantly longer bypass and cross-clamp times, and a greater proportion of patients underwent ECMO cannulation via the axillary artery. In-hospital mortality was not significantly different (51.8% vs. 63.1%, p=0.356). <h3>Conclusion</h3> ECMO support for aortic surgical patients provides survival comparable to that for CABG and/or valve patients.

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

Background A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis–containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes. Methods From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation ( n = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure ( n = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs. Results Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all p < 0.02) versus receiving a Bentall procedure. Operative mortality was 0.16% (reimplantation, 1/448, 0.22%; Bentall 0/195, 0%). After reimplantation, 8-year freedom from severe AR was 95% and 10-year freedom from reintervention was 98%. Ten-year survival was 95%. Higher preoperative AR grade ( p < 0.0001) but not larger root diameter ( p = 0.3) was associated with higher grade of late regurgitation after a reimplantation procedure. Among propensity-matched patients, reimplantation compared with a Bentall was associated with similar 10-year survival (89% vs. 94%), but more late AR (8-year freedom from severe AR: 93% vs. 99.9%) and greater early reduction in, but similar late, left ventricular mass (104 vs. 105 g•m –2 at 8 years). Conclusion Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

Contained rupture of a sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: Is it just a matter of luck?

BackgroundContained rupture of the ascending aorta is a rare condition, but the severity of this complication enforces strict guidelines for its prevention and a prompt diagnosis, once already occurred.Case presentationA 66-year-old man with a history of type 2 diabetes, longstanding aortic valve stenosis and aortic root aneurysm of 47 mm was hospital admitted for elective surgery. A Bentall-De Bono procedure was performed in order to replace the stenotic bicuspid aortic valve and exclude the dilated portion of the aortic wall. Intraoperatively, a discontinuity of the aortic wall, just above the aortic annulus, at the non-coronary sinus of Valsalva was incidentally observed. The aortic wall discontinuity was none other than a contained aortic rupture. The preoperative CT-scan images were afterwards analyzed by the radiologist, in order to identify the contained aortic rupture. Indeed a false aneurysm of the non-coronary sinus of Valsalva of a maximum diameter of 15 mm was detected, thanks to a 3D reconstruction.ConclusionsThe diagnosis of contained aortic rupture is certainly demanding, particularly in absence of signs or symptoms of rupture in a chamber of the heart or in the pericardium. Although this case represents a consensus of experts’ opinion, the recognition of these specific cases in which the risk of dissection, rupture or death is at its highest, would allow to operate at the appropriate time, improving the outcomes.

Surgical dilemma - spare or replace regurgitant aortic valve: Late comparative outcomes of two strategies.

To evaluate different aortic root surgery techniques and their contemporary clinical outcomes in patients with regurgitant aortic valve and aortic root aneurysm. The study consisted of 141 adult patients who underwent aortic valve reimplantation (David group = 73) or aortic valve replacement surgery (Bentall group = 68) for aortic valve regurgitation (AR) and dilatation of the aortic root at our institution within the same period (April 2004-October 2016). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and other clinically relevant outcomes between the groups. The completeness of clinical follow-up was 100%, with a mean time of 8.0 ± 3.8years. Thirty-day (in-hospital) mortality rates were equivalent between groups (1.3 and 1.5%, p = 1.0). The overall survival rates at 10years were significantly better for the David group patients comparing to Bentall group patients (95.3 ± 2.6% vs 79.7 ± 6.8%; p = 0.04) with similar freedom from AV related reoperation (94.4 ± 2.7% vs 98.5 ± 1.5%; p = 0.2). Freedom from bleeding events at 10years was 90.7 ± 3.6% for Bentall group patients and none were observed among David group patients (p = 0.01). Aortic valve and root surgery can be performed with equivalent safety and efficacy using either valve-sparing (David procedure) or valve-replacing (Bentall procedure) techniques in selected patients. Furthermore, patients after the David procedure demonstrated significantly improved survival and low risk of bleeding in comparison to the Bentall procedure with an acceptable risk of reoperation at 10years follow-up.

The addition of Tirofiban infusion to heparin for intraoperative heparin resistance associated with Marfan Syndrome

Marfan syndrome classically presents with aortic root aneurysms. Aortic ectasia causes diverse blood flow alterations, influencing the behavior of coagulation factors and platelet activity. Heparin resistance has also been reported associated with Marfan Syndrome in a small number of patients, probably due to antithrombin III (ATIII) deficiency or various mutations. The ascending aorta and the aortic valve are replaced with prosthetic material during Bentall- de Bonno procedures. Resistance to anticoagulation during extracorporeal circulation, represents a significant challenge for both anesthesiologists and the surgical team. Resistance to heparin was observed in a patient with Marfan syndrome undergoing a Bentall procedure. ATIII concentrate was not available, and ACT did not increase despite high doses of heparin. An alternate anticoagulation approach was used successfully.

Latent TGFβ-binding proteins 1 and 3 protect the larval zebrafish outflow tract from aneurysmal dilatation.

ABSTRACTAortic root aneurysm is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndromes, where perturbations in transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling play a causal or contributory role, respectively. Despite the advantages of cross-species disease modeling, animal models of aortic root aneurysm are largely restricted to genetically engineered mice. Here, we report that zebrafish devoid of the genes encoding latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 1 and 3 (ltbp1 and ltbp3, respectively) develop rapid and severe aneurysm of the outflow tract (OFT), the aortic root equivalent. Similar to syndromic aneurysm tissue, the distended OFTs display evidence for paradoxical hyperactivated TGFβ signaling. RNA-sequencing revealed significant overlap between the molecular signatures of disease tissue from mutant zebrafish and a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Moreover, chemical inhibition of TGFβ signaling in wild-type animals phenocopied mutants but chemical activation did not, demonstrating that TGFβ signaling is protective against aneurysm. Human relevance is supported by recent studies implicating genetic lesions in LTBP3 and, potentially, LTBP1 as heritable causes of aortic root aneurysm. Ultimately, our data demonstrate that zebrafish can now be leveraged to interrogate thoracic aneurysmal disease and identify novel lead compounds through small-molecule suppressor screens.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Aortic valve repair using pericardial patch standardized with external ring annuloplasty.

This study was undertaken to analyse outcomes of aortic valve repair using additional material and compare the results to those of cusp repair without the use of the pericardial patch. All consecutive patients aged over 16 who underwent aortic valve repair with external ring annuloplasty for isolated aortic insufficiency, aortic insufficiency and tubular aortic aneurysm or aortic root aneurysm between May 2003 and November 2019 were included in a cohort study. Data were collected and analysed from the AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry). Propensity score framework analysis (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to compare outcomes of the groups while controlling for confounders. During the 16-year study period, 618 patients underwent aortic valve repair. Eight-year survival rate was 92% in the patch group and 90.2% in the no patch group without significant differences [P = 0.957 inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) weighted]. Early valve-related reoperation was more frequent in the patch group as compared to the no patch group (6% vs 1%, P < 0.001 IPTW weighted), the freedom from aortic valve-related reintervention and from structural valve deterioration at 8 years was not significantly different between the patch and no patch groups (93.7% vs 94%, P = 0.968 IPTW weighted; and 99.3% vs 96.7%, P = 0.964 IPTW weighted). Although a higher rate of early reintervention was observed, aortic valve repair using the pericardial patch, in a standardized approach using external annuloplasty, with effective coaptation height of at least 9 mm, was not associated with an increase in mid-term aortic valve-related reoperation or structural valve deterioration as compared to valve repair without the pericardial patch.

Association between left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality after Bentall procedure.

Root infection or dissection involving coronary artery frequently necessitates an emergent Bentall procedure, with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In contrast, concerning an elective Bentall for aneurysm, surgeons should balance the risk and benefit of surgery, especially in low LVEF cases. We investigated the association between preoperative LVEF and outcomes after Bentall. We analyzed 98 patients undergoing Bentall between April 2000 and March 2020. The patients were stratified into three groups: (a) 65 with LVEF ≥ 60%, (b) 21 with LVEF 45 to < 60%, and (c) 12 with LVEF < 45%. Baseline characteristics, survivals, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared. To assess potential non-linear relationship between LVEF and mortality, cubic spline analysis was conducted. Median age was similar (a vs b vs c, 52 vs 50 vs 44). In all groups, elective root aneurysm was 50-60%, indicating the rest were complicated and sick. Operative mortality was the highest in group c (4.6% vs 9.5% vs 16.7%, p = 0.294). Survival and MACE-free rate were the worst in group c, though their 10-year survival was 40%. LVEF was an independent risk for mortality, and cubic spline analysis showed potential non-linear association between LVEF and mortality. Although LVEF is an independent predictor of mortality after Bentall, long-term survival was occasionally achieved in low LVEF cases. While surgeons should carefully balance the risk of low LVEF and the benefit of surgery in elective cases, we should perform a non-elective procedure as needed, even if LVEF is low.

Outcomes of Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve in Patients With Aortic Cusp Fenestration

BackgroundAortic cusp fenestrations are common in patients with aortic root aneurysm, and their management during aortic valve repair remains controversial. We believe that fenestrations in the area of the commissures may rupture after reimplantation of the aortic valve because this operation increases the mechanical stress on the cusps. For this reason we have reinforced the free margin of the aortic cusp with fenestration with fine Gore-Tex sutures (WL Gore). This study examines the outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve in patients who had cusp fenestration reinforced with Gore-Tex sutures. MethodsA review of all patients who had reimplantation of the aortic valve for aortic root aneurysm disclosed 111 patients who had at least 1 cusp fenestration reinforced with a double layer of a fine Gore-Tex suture. The outcomes of these patients were examined and compared with a group of patients without fenestration using propensity score analysis. All patients were followed prospectively with images of the heart. ResultsThe median follow-up was 8.3 years. Overall the cumulative incidence of aortic valve reintervention at 15 years was 4.8% and the cumulative incidence of aortic insufficiency of moderate or severe degree was 9.2%. Comparison of outcomes of patients with and without fenestrations showed similar results up to 15 years of follow-up. ConclusionsReinforcement of the free margins of cusps with fenestrations using Gore-Tex sutures is safe and does not seem to adversely affect the durability of reimplantation of the aortic valve.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: a primer for cardiologists.

The purpose of this article is to review the contemporary evidence supporting valve-sparing aortic root replacement as the best option for patients with aortic root aneurysms and preservable aortic valves as well as to review the technical variations and modern adjuncts of these operations that impact both short and long-term durability. In patients with an aortic root aneurysm, with or without aortic valve regurgitation, valve-sparing aortic root replacement provide excellent clinical outcomes and stable valve function over several decades. Successful execution of this operation depends on careful patient selection and a thorough understanding of the anatomical and physiological relationships between the various components of the aortic root. Echocardiography remains the mainstay of imaging to determine the feasibility of valve-sparing root replacement. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement is an excellent alternative to composite valve graft replacement in nonelderly patients with aortic root aneurysms. Dedicated aortic root surgeons perform several technical variations of valve-sparing procedures aimed at matching the specific aortic root disorder with the optimal operation.

Aortic pseudoaneurysm with fistulization to the right atrium: A case report

The surgical technique to repair aortic root aneurysm has undergone significant advancement since the Bentall procedure was first performed in 1968.1 The original Bentall used a composite aortic root graft with a mechanical aortic valve, wrapping native aortic tissue around the proximal graft. While the modified Bentall with coronary buttons has demonstrated fewer complications, the risk of pseudoaneurysm (PsA), although rarer, persists. PsA may complicate up to 6% to 10% of all aortic root repairs, at times several years following surgery.

A novel computational growth framework for biological tissues: Application to growth of aortic root aneurysm repaired by the V-shape surgery

Ascending aortic aneurysms (AsAA) often include the dilatation of sinotubular junction (STJ) and extend proximally into the aortic root, which usually leads to aortic insufficiency. The novel surgery of the V-shape resection of the noncoronary sinus, for treatment of AsAA with root ectasia, has been shown to be a simpler procedure compared to traditional surgeries. Our previous study showed that the repaired aortic root aneurysms grew after the surgery. In this study, we developed a novel computational growth framework to model the growth of the aortic root repaired by the V-shape surgery. Specifically, the unified-fiber-distribution (UFD) model was applied to describe the hyperelastic deformation of the aortic tissue. A novel kinematic growth evolution law was proposed based on existing observations that the growth rate is linearly dependent on the wall stress. Moreover, we also obtained patient-specific geometries of the repaired aortic root post-surgery at two follow-up time points (Post-1 and Post-2) for 5 patients, based on clinical CT images. The novel computational growth framework was implemented into the Abaqus UMAT user subroutine and applied to model the growth of the aortic root from Post-1 to Post-2. Patient-specific growth parameters were obtained by an optimization procedure. The predicted geometry and stress of the aortic root at Post-2 agree well with the in vivo results. The novel computational growth framework and the optimized growth parameters could be applied to predict the growth of repaired aortic root aneurysms for new patients and to optimize repair strategies for AsAA.

Progress in surgical interventions for aortic root aneurysms and dissections

Introduction : The aortic root is a uniquely sensitive region as it anatomically encompasses the aortic valve leaflets and gives origin to the coronary arteries. These associated structures, in addition to the aortic tube, itself, add immensely to the complexity of replacing this segment when it is aneurysmal or dissected. Given this complexity, many contemporary choices for treatment of aortic root aneurysms have evolved over the past few decades. Areas covered The aim of this study was to provide an updated review of the literature regarding various surgical options for management of aortic root aneurysmal disease. A systematic search in Pubmed database was performed for articles related to various aortic root surgeries and outcomes published between 1998 to 2020. Expert opinion : For multiple technical options in aortic root replacement surgery, decades of surgical investigation and development have shown favorable results, which provide a formidable armamentarium to be used at the discretion of the surgeon to suit various patient anatomic patterns and risk profile–while still durably controlling the aortic pathology and protecting from recurrence, valve dysfunction, progressive dilatation, and aortic dissection.

In-hospital and mid-term results of aortic root remodeling and aortic valve annuloplasty in patients with aortic root aneurysm and no severe aortic valve disease

To analyze early and mid-term results of aortic root remodeling with aortic valve annuloplasty in patients with aortic root aneurysm and no severe aortic valve disease. There were 33 patients with connective tissue dysplasia, aneurysm of aortic root and/or ascending aorta and aortic regurgitation between September 2019 and December 2022. All patients underwent aortic root remodeling with aortic valve annuloplasty. Mean time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 138.5±21.5 min, aortic clamping - 115.3±20.5 min. According to postoperative transthoracic echocardiography, mild aortic regurgitation was observed in 28 patients, 5 patients had moderate regurgitation. Postoperative follow-up period varied from 3 months to 2 years. There was no in-hospital mortality or significant cardiovascular complications. Two-year freedom from moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation was 93.9%, overall survival - 100%. Aortic root remodeling is characterized by favorable hemodynamic efficiency and low complication rate.

Aortic root remodeling and aortic valve annuloplasty in patients with aortic root aneurysm and no severe aortic valve disease

Analysis of the outcomes after aortic root remodeling with aortic valve annuloplasty in patients with aortic root aneurysm and no severe aortic valve disease. There were 19 patients with connective tissue dysplasia, aneurysm of aortic root and/or ascending aorta and aortic regurgitation between September 2020 and December 2021. All patients underwent aortic root remodeling with aortic valve annuloplasty. Mean time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 148.7±23.5 min, aortic clamping - 117.3±19.5 min. According to postoperative transthoracic echocardiography, mild aortic regurgitation was observed in 6 patients, 13 patients had no regurgitation. There was no in-hospital mortality or significant cardiovascular complications. Freedom from moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after 14 months was 94.7%, overall survival - 100%. Aortic root remodeling is characterized by favorable hemodynamic efficiency and low complication rate. Further accumulation of data with clinical analysis are planned for a more accurate assessment of effectiveness of surgical treatment, determination of predictors of successful reconstruction, development of indications, contraindications and a personalized algorithm for patient selection.