Role Of Speech-language Pathologist Research Articles

The role of speech-language pathologists in supporting theory of mind through literacy-based activities

PurposeThis tutorial discusses the importance of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) supporting individuals with language disorders in their understanding of others’ cognitive and affective states (theory of mind, ToM), with a special consideration given to applying these suggestions with individuals who are neurodivergent. MethodI motivate this tutorial by first reviewing the literature related to ToM and language abilities for various populations of individuals with language difficulties, highlighting the need for explicitly targeting the language-related skills that are thought to underlie ToM for individuals with language disorders. I next present concrete examples of how to support ToM through literacy-based activities. I follow this discussion with a short description of how these activities may be applied with individuals who are neurodivergent through concrete examples, such as how inclusion of neurodivergent characters in storybooks can aid in educating children about understanding others’ perspectives. It further emphasizes the importance of discussing various types of mental and emotional states for individuals who share as well as differ in their neurotypes. ConclusionsLanguage skills are an integral part of ToM abilities. SLPs play an important role in supporting clients’ academic, literacy, and social outcomes and can support important perspective-taking skills through associated language/communication skills. The various skills that fall under the umbrella term ‘theory of mind’ can be appropriately incorporated into intervention and literacy-based tasks in a way that respects differences in neurotype while still building important language and communication skills for clients.

The role of speech-language pathologists in frailty: An Australian qualitative study of perceptions, practices, and opportunities

Purpose Frailty is an important geriatric syndrome, yet the role of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in identifying and managing frailty remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of SLPs regarding frailty, including enablers, barriers, and opportunities for multidisciplinary improvements to frailty prevention and management. Method In this exploratory qualitative study, data were collected from SLPs through online semi-structured interviews and analysed using a qualitative descriptive approach. Result Seven Australian SLPs from acute, rehabilitation, geriatric, and community settings were interviewed. Three overarching themes were created: (1) SLPs understand the clinical manifestation of frailty but do not use explicit language to describe it; (2) SLPs acknowledged the importance of addressing knowledge gaps and barriers in frailty management; and (3) SLPs do not currently have an established identity within the frailty field, but do have a role within the multidisciplinary team and the care of people living with frailty. Conclusion Participants’ understandings of frailty varied and highlighted the lack of education about frailty as barriers to effective service provision. Additional research is required to produce formal recommendations for SLPs regarding frailty management, which may include frailty education to SLPs and awareness of SLPs’ role within the multidisciplinary team.

A Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists’ Knowledge and Perception About Their Role in Providing Dysphagia Services in India

Purpose: Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) are frequently involved in dysphagia services including identification, assessment, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Understanding of SLPs’ role in dysphagia care has evolved drastically in India over the last decade; however, research and advocacy are still in emerging status. In order to refine dysphagia practice patterns in India, we should understand the current standards. Thus, the present study was conceived to investigate SLPs’ knowledge and perception about their role in providing dysphagia services in India.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey research design was employed. The survey questionnaire comprised of four sections that evaluated SLPs’ demographic characteristics, exposure to dysphagia services, self-perception about their role in the dysphagia rehabilitation team, and knowledge related to assessment and management of individuals with dysphagia. The obtained responses were stored in Google forms and were further analyzed in terms of percentage.Results: A total of 269 SLPs responded to the survey and 59% of the respondent SLPs practicing in India were rendering dysphagia services. Although a majority of the SLPs had adequate knowledge and were aware of their role in the interdisciplinary dysphagia rehabilitation, they lacked opportunities to be a part of the team.Conclusion: The survey clearly identified the trend and issues in dysphagia service delivery by SLPs in the Indian scenario by evaluating their knowledge and skills fundamental to the assessment and management of individuals with dysphagia. This further necessitates a re-examination of the role of SLPs in providing dysphagia services in India in view of establishing standard guidelines and practice patterns.

Cognitive-Communication Disorders and Neurodisability in the Criminal Justice System: Emerging Roles, Responsibilities, and Opportunities for Speech-Language Pathologists

Purpose: The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide a framework for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) supporting youth and adults in the criminal justice system (CJS) who have cognitive-communication disorders (CCDs) related to neurodisability. Method: We provide an overview of communication disorders and CCDs in the CJS as well as the underlying etiologies leading to neurodisability, with a primary focus on traumatic brain injury. Additionally, we provide a framework for understanding the underlying factors that contribute to criminalization and recidivism as well as elucidate the role of SLPs in the context of the CJS. Results: SLPs have an important role to play with youth and adults in the CJS and should be routinely involved in the screening of communication disorders; in the provision of assessments, intervention, education, and training; and in advocacy roles. Conclusion: The high prevalence of CCDs in the CJS affords a unique and important role for SLPs to be active members of the interdisciplinary justice team, which, ultimately, may improve outcomes and reduce the cycle of recidivism.

The role of speech-language therapists with children and young people who have experienced maltreatment: a systematized review

ABSTRACT A growing body of research highlights the increased risk of communication disorders for children and young people (CYP) who have experienced maltreatment. Provision of communication support for maltreated CYP is endorsed by a number of professional speech pathology associations; however, research describing the role and practice of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) with this population is limited. This systematized review aims to describe the role of SLPs when working with CYP who have experienced maltreatment, how SLPs are using their skills and knowledge with this population, and the factors that influence clinical practice. A comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted across seven databases. A total of 12 studies met inclusion criteria. These articles were critiqued, and meaningful themes were generated using reflexive thematic analysis. The thematic analysis revealed two themes and three subthemes: (1) SLPs use their skills in flexible ways to meet the complex needs of CYP who have experienced maltreatment: (a) assessment considerations, (b) models of practice, and (c) SLPs strive to provide trauma-informed care; and (2) Clinician-level and service-level factors influence SLP’s clinical practice with this population. High rates of communication difficulties for maltreated CYP highlights an important role for SLPs in the provision of targeted and universal support with this population. Further research is required to not only inform evidence-based clincial approaches for SLPs, but to also advocate for the role of SLPs in the early identification and prevention of the adverse impacts of child maltreatment.

Speech-Language Pathologists and Disaster Management: Team Roles

Purpose: Disaster management is a topic that is multi-faceted and intricately maintained by professionals who volunteer their expertise and time to assist those who have been affected by an unforeseen disaster. Creating a well-rounded and effective team is of immense importance during disaster situations. Speech-language pathologists can provide vital skills in the realm of communication, feeding, and other areas. However, the role of speech language pathologists within the disaster management team is not well documented in the literature. The purpose of the study was to identify awareness, involvement, and training of speech language pathologists in disaster management stages through exploration of their self-reported knowledge, skills, and roles to better understand their likelihood of response and potential collaborative roles within a disaster management team. Method: To gather data on self-reported awareness, knowledge, skills, participation, training, and perceptions of speech language pathologists as part of the disaster management stage, a cross-sectional survey study was designed. The study specifically targeted licensed speech language pathologists within the state of Florida. Results: There were 216 viable survey responses to analyze. Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted to examine how speech-language professionals perceive their fit in the arena of disaster management. Speech language pathologists who responded to this survey were primarily white, 40–49-year-old females who had experienced some form of disaster. Most respondents reported receiving no training in disaster management; however, they indicated that speech language pathologists and other healthcare professionals have unique skills that could contribute to disaster management stages. Although there was reportedly limited training and guidance available and minimal professional experience with disaster, speech language pathologists who reported having professional experience with disaster stages, indicated an increased likelihood of participating in future disaster management. Conclusions: Similar to interdisciplinary teams found in clinical practice, healthcare professionals need training and education about their roles to form teams to address the needs of individuals in all disaster management stages. Analyses indicated that speech language pathologists perceive themselves, and other healthcare professionals, could provide meaningful contributions to the disaster management team; however, they have not had adequate professional experience or training.

The Role of Speech-Language Pathologists in Expanding Delivery of Teen Online Problem Solving for Adolescents With Acquired Brain Injury: A Quality Improvement Project.

Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) is an evidence-based teletherapy program designed to promote neurocognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial recovery following brain injury through family-centered training. To date, TOPS has been primarily administered by neuropsychologists and clinical psychologists. This clinical focus article discusses a quality improvement project to adapt the TOPS training and manual for use by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and reports feedback from SLPs following TOPS training and after delivering the program with adolescents who experienced neurological insults. SLPs were invited to participate in TOPS training. Trainees were asked to complete posttraining surveys, active therapist questionnaires, and follow-up surveys directed to SLPs who had completed the intervention with at least one patient. To date, a total of 38 SLPs completed TOPS training, 13 have implemented TOPS with at least one adolescent. Eight SLPs and 16 psychologists/trainees responded to follow-up surveys to share their perspectives on the program. Perceptions of clinicians delivering the program did not differ significantly in most respects. SLPs rated the ease of understanding nonverbal communication higher than psychologists. Seven SLPs responded to an SLP-specific survey about their experiences administering TOPS, noting a range of advantages and some limitations in their open-ended responses. Training SLPs to deliver TOPS has the potential to increase service provision to adolescents with acquired brain injury who have cognitive communication difficulties and their families. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22357327.

Resisting Ableism in School-Based Speech-Language Therapy: An Invitation to Change.

Resisting Ableism in School-Based Speech-Language Therapy: An Invitation to Change.

Awareness and Knowledge of Health Science Professionals on the Role of Speech-language Pathologists in Stroke Rehabilitation

Abstract Introduction: Stroke is a complex condition that requires various health professionals’ coordinated and effective collaboration. Although the team approach is regarded as the most successful approach to stroke rehabilitation, understanding of the potential roles and responsibilities of each health professional by other team members remains variable. As speech-language pathologists work collaboratively in a patient-focused stroke rehabilitation team, other health science professionals must be aware of their roles. To investigate health science professionals’ awareness and knowledge of the role of speech-language pathologists in the stroke rehabilitation team. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was conducted through hybrid mode. One hundred and ninety-two students from seven different health science backgrounds including Ayurveda, Medicine, Nursing, Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy, Psychology and Dietetics participated in the present study. Results: Among the different health science groups, students from occupational therapy were found to have relatively better awareness and knowledge about the role of speech-language pathologists in stroke rehabilitation. However, perceptions about the same among other groups were variable. Conclusions: It is of utmost significance that all health science practitioners should be aware of the roles and responsibilities of each team members’ role in stroke rehabilitation which may facilitate better patient outcomes.

Prospective of professionals toward role of speech-language pathologist in assessment and management of dysphagia

Prospective of professionals toward role of speech-language pathologist in assessment and management of dysphagia

Sensory based interventions by speech language pathologists

BACKGROUND: The use of sensory based interventions (SBI) by many parties including speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are evident despite limited proof of their efficacy. Insight into SLPs’ implementation, knowledge, and perceptions of SBI are crucial to define and guide such practices in the field of speech-language therapy. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to gather information regarding the nature of SBI, knowledge of sensory processing and SBI, and perception of the role and outcomes of SBI as implemented by SLPs. METHOD: A quantitative survey design was employed. Sixty-five SLPs working in early intervention clinics, public hospital clinics, school settings, and private practice responded to a questionnaire. Results were analysed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Respondents indicated that they often implement SBI using various sensory activities and equipment. They answered more than half of the questions related to the prevalence and nature of sensory difficulties in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (CWASD) accurately. Respondents answered fewer questions regarding the differences between SBI and sensory integration therapy accurately. Regular collaboration with and guidance from occupational therapists (OTs) were reported. Respondents acknowledged the role of SLPs in addressing sensory difficulties in CWASD. Positive outcomes for the implementation of SBI in speech-language therapy were stated. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited evidence for the efficacy of SBI, SLPs regularly implement such practices to enhance therapy outcomes. The insights gathered from this study support reports of positive outcomes related to SBI. The need for more rigorous efficacy studies, clearer guidelines and specialised training for SLT’s in SBI are highlighted.

Dysphagia in the Presence of Varicella-Zoster Virus and SARS-CoV-2: A Case Report on the Role of Speech-Language Pathology

Purpose: Dysphagia due to cranial nerve neuritis is a rare complication of varicella-zoster virus reactivation. In this case report, we describe a single patient diagnosed with varicella-zoster virus meningitis with acute onset dysphagia, the instrumental assessments and interventions employed by speech-language pathologists (SLPs), and discuss the role of these clinicians in the management of these patients. Conclusion: The results of this case study demonstrate the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach and the vital role of SLPs in the evaluation and treatment of dysphagia of unknown etiology.

Malaysian speech-language pathology students’ reflections about their participation in an AAC training program

Most speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Malaysia practice with an undergraduate degree, which provides them with limited knowledge about and training in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). This limited knowledge and training may affect their confidence and competence when introducing and using AAC with individuals for whom it is required. This study aimed to obtain feedback, via semi-structured interviews, from a group of 11 Malaysian university students who participated in an AAC training program about their experiences participating in and the effectiveness of the training program. Three themes were derived from qualitative content analysis of the interviews: (a)Time Demands, (b) Generalizing the use of AAC, and (c) Learning Required When Introducing AAC. The participants reported that they obtained better insights into the role of SLPs and communication partners with regards to AAC, as well as the struggles they faced. Students also reported increased confidence when working with individuals who use AAC after participating in the training program, thus supporting the need for similar training programs in the future.

Speech-language Pathologist: A Team Member for Management of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Head and Neck cancer is one of the most prevalent conditions in the world and so is in Nepal. Head and Neck cancer causes speech, language, and swallowing disorder that affects the quality of life of a patient. A multidisciplinary team is needed for the management of the cancer patient. A Speech Language Pathologist is one important team member involved in the rehabilitation of communication and swallowing issues. The role of Speech Language pathologists should be understood by other medical professionals and need to be integrated into the team to provide a holistic health care facility to an individual with head and cancer.

Influencing discussions and use of neuroadvancements as professionals and citizens: Perspectives of Canadian speech-language pathologists and audiologists.

Early involvement of stakeholders in neuroethics and neurogovernance discourses of neuroscientific and neurotechnological advancements is seen as essential to curtail negative consequences. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and audiologists (AUs) make use of neuroadvancements including cochlear implants, brain-computer interfaces, and deep-brain stimulation. Although they have a stake in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions, they are rarely mentioned in having a role, whether as professionals or as citizens. The objective of the study was to explore the role of SLPs and AUs as professionals and citizens in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions and examine the utility of lifelong learning mechanisms to learn about the implications of neuroadvancements to contribute in a meaningful way to these discussions. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 7 SLPs and 3 AUs were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants stated that their roles expected from them as professionals and as citizens indicate the importance to be knowledgeable on ethical, legal, and social implications of neuroadvancements and that lifelong learning is not used to learn about these implications. More must be done to facilitate the participation of SLPs and AUs in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions, which would enrich the neuroethics and neurogovernance discourses benefitting patients, professionals, and the public.

Changes in speech, language and swallowing services during the Covid-19 pandemic: The perspective of speech-language pathologists in Saudi Arabia

PurposeThe study aimed to investigate changes in the role of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. It also assessed the SLPs’ perceptions of delivering services using telehealth as a part of their everyday clinical practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodSLPs in Saudi Arabia were invited to complete a web-based survey covering questions related to changes to the role of SLPs during the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in the ways speech services are delivered; and the benefits and barriers of using telehealth in clinical practice as identified by SLPs.ResultsNinety-one SLPs completed the survey. About 94% of the respondents experienced changes in their role as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The nature of changes they had experienced including decreased work time, providing support and counseling to patients or caregivers using the telephone, providing assessment and therapy using telehealth, and working with a limited number of cases. Ninety-three percent of the respondents who have used telehealth started to use it only during the pandemic. Mostly seen caseloads were pediatric speech and language disorders. Further, 96% of respondents used telehealth for counseling, 69% for rehabilitation or treatment, 63% for screening, 56% for evaluation or assessment, 48% for a referral to other professional services, and 46% for differential diagnosis. About 70% of the SLPs showed interest to continue using telehealth in the future. Several benefits were identified to using telehealth, including accessibility, cost efficiency, and the ability to engage patients with their families in therapy sessions. On the other hand, barriers to using telehealth included internet and technical issues, lack of direct communication, and difficulty controlling the therapy setting.ConclusionsThe study has shown that SLPs in Saudi Arabia have experienced changes during the COVID-19 outbreak. The survey responses also indicate that the SLPs are adopting telehealth applications at an accelerated pace as a result of the pandemic.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns of obstructive sleep apnea among speech-language pathologists.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder characterised by repeated narrowing and closure of the upper airway during sleep. Despite growing evidence that dysphagia is a frequent sequela of OSA, the role of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in managing OSA remains unclear. The aim of this international study was to evaluate SLPs knowledge, attitudes, and experience of OSA. A validated questionnaire, OSA Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA), was distributed to SLPs internationally via an online survey. Additional information on demographics, educational history, and clinical practices was ascertained. From a total of 1647 respondents, 822 clinicians from twenty-four countries were included in the final analysis. Knowledge of OSA among SLPs was limited; the mean (SD) rate of correct answers was 55% (22%). Over half of SLPs reported patients with OSA on their caseload, with the majority of patients referred for dysphagia services. Yet, only half of SLPs reported confidence in their ability to assess or manage dysphagia in patients with OSA. SLPs' experience of OSA had an effect on their knowledge and attitudes [F (2, 817) = 17.279, p < 0.001]. SLPs are involved in the management of patients with OSA but are practising with limited knowledge and confidence. The findings highlight the need to increase OSA education and training for SLPs. In addition, there is a need for targeted research to increase the evidence base for development of clinical practice guidelines for dysphagia management in patients with OSA.

First-Line Health Care Providers' Reported Knowledge of and Referrals to Speech-Language Pathologists for Clients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Purpose People with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may experience deficits in cognition or communication that go unnoticed by first-line health care providers (FHPs). Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) assess and treat these domains yet are often underrepresented on mTBI multidisciplinary teams. This study's aim was to evaluate FHPs' reported knowledge of and referral practices to SLPs for individuals across the life span with mTBI. Method Physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, and athletic trainers (n = 126) completed an online survey, including two Likert scale questions and one free response question relating to SLPs' role in mTBI. Results More than half of FHPs rate their knowledge of the SLP's role in mTBI management as low (somewhat knowledgeable, 29%; not very knowledgeable, 23%). Similarly, nearly two thirds of FHPs indicated rarely (19%) or never (44%), referring to SLPs for management of patients with mTBI. The majority of FHPs' open responses on the role of the SLP in mTBI management were incomplete, with many including domains that were not relevant to an SLP's role in the management of mTBI (e.g., dysphagia). Within the article, we provide results overall and according to individual profession. Conclusions Results suggest a majority of FHPs lack knowledge in the role of the SLP in the management of mTBI, which may underpin the low referral patterns reported by FHPs for SLP services. Future educational efforts for FHPs regarding the role of SLPs in mTBI care are necessary.

The Role of Speech-language Pathologists in the Hospitals of Pakistan

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and perception of the role of speech therapists by other medical professionals in public hospitals. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 200 healthcare professionals with &gt;1year of job experience at the workplace of both genders and any age. Besides, the study subjects were selected using a non-probability convenience sampling approach. The study sample was recruited from 25 District and Tehsil Headquarter Hospitals from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. A basic demographic datasheet and the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey were used for data collection. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS. Results: Out of the total 200 eligible professionals from different departments, the Mean±SD scores of the responses were highest (75.14±24.87) in pediatric medical professionals. Moreover, the lowest scores (46.70±0.01) concerned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) experts; this difference was statistically significant (P&lt;0.001). Similarly, a significantly higher Mean±SD score of 74.05±20.04 was noted for those working day shifts, compared to that of (35.01±8.52) those working in night shifts (P&lt;0.001). Discussion: The knowledge and perception of different healthcare professionals serving in public hospitals vary regarding the role of SLPs. Such differences concern their profession, with pediatrics presenting the highest level of understanding, followed by general medicine. However, psychiatry and ENT professional provided the least understanding in this area. The professionals working in day shifts suggested better knowledge and perception, compared to night shifts staff.

Current Practices Among Speech-Language Pathologists for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mixed-Methods Modified Delphi Approach.

Purpose The study purpose was to capture the clinical practice patterns of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) treating mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; concussion). Study aims were to (a) characterize expert SLP practice patterns for the management of mTBI and (b) use qualitative content analysis to explore areas of quantitative variability within participants' responses. Method Using a modified Delphi approach, SLPs completed an online survey, with Round 1 responses shaping questions for Round 2. Round 2 results were analyzed using a concurrent partially mixed-methods approach with quantitative and qualitative items. Quantitative consensus agreement levels were set prestudy at 75% agreement or higher. Topic-level items that did not reach consensus were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Participants SLPs engaging in a specialty mTBI-SLP networking group were invited to participate. Round 1 had nine participants (United States: 4, Canada: 5). Round 2 had 18 participants (United States: 12, Canada: 6), with a mean of 15.7 years of experience in mTBI (range: 3-33) and a mean of 7.6 clients with mTBI seen weekly (range: 1-25). Results Nearly all topic-level practice items met quantitative consensus (42/45). Consensus areas included using conceptual frameworks, interprofessional teaming, assessment and intervention practices, goal setting, and outcomes. Functional, collaborative, and client-centered care anchored clinical practice. Areas lacking consensus included SLP roles in mTBI mental and somatic health symptoms, specific measurement tools, and intervention dosages. Qualitative themes that emerged included limited interprofessional awareness for the role of SLPs in mTBI and challenges in measurement selection. Conclusions Study aims were met with clear consensus on clinical patterns implemented by SLPs specializing in mTBI. Results will inform both current clinical practices and future practice guidelines. High-level guidance and advocacy are needed to clarify SLP practice concerns and advance interprofessional education. Future work should address identified gaps, including targeted assessment tools and consensus on intervention methods.