Role Of Nitric Oxide In Cancer Research Articles

Bj-PRO-10c, as an allosteric regulator of argininosuccinate synthase, is a potential therapy for neuroblastoma metastasis

Cancer is a global public health issue. Neuroblastoma (NB) originates from any tissue of the sympathetic nervous system, and the most affected site is the abdomen. The adrenal gland is the primary site in 38% of cases. Approximately 50% of patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis, and bone marrow is often affected. Metastatic disease is characterized by the spreading of cancer cells that are frequently resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy from the primary tumor to other specific parts of the body and is responsible for 90% of cancer-related deaths. Increasing evidence has indicated that nitric oxide (NO) signaling is implicated in the pathophysiology of many types of cancer, particularly in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. However, the effect of NO on metastasis cannot be easily classified as prometastatic or antimetastatic. An understanding at the molecular level of the role of NO in cancer will have profound therapeutic implications for the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Here, the proline-rich decapeptide isolated from Bothrops jararaca venom (Bj-PRO-10c) that enhances and sustains the generation of NO was used to unravel the role of metabolic NO in steps of metastasis. Bj-PRO-10c showed an antimetastatic effect, mainly by interfering with actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, controlling cell proliferation, and decreasing the seeding efficiency of NB in metastatic niches. Therefore, we proposed that an approach for controlled NO induction with the right molecular strategies can hopefully inhibit metastasis and increase the lifespan of NB patients.

Nitric Oxide and Immune Responses in Cancer: Searching for New Therapeutic Strategies.

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in understanding the mysterious functions of nitric oxide (NO) and how this pleiotropic signaling molecule contributes to tumorigenesis. This review attempts to expose and discuss the information available on the immunomodulatory role of NO in cancer and recent approaches to the role of NO donors in the area of immunotherapy. To address the goal, the following databases were searched to identify relevant literature concerning empirical evidence: The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Medline, and EMBASE from 1980 through March 2020. Valuable attempts have been made to develop distinctive NO-based cancer therapy. Although the data do not allow generalization, the evidence seems to indicate that low/moderate levels may favor tumorigenesis, while higher levels would exert antitumor effects. In this sense, the use of NO donors could have an important therapeutic potential within immunotherapy, although there are still no clinical trials. The emerging understanding of NO-regulated immune responses in cancer may help unravel the recent features of this "doubleedged sword" in cancer physiological and pathologic processes and its potential use as a therapeutic agent for cancer treatment. In short, in this review, we discuss the complex cellular mechanism in which NO, as a pleiotropic signaling molecule, participates in cancer pathophysiology. We also debate the dual role of NO in cancer and tumor progression and clinical approaches for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) based therapy against cancer.

Molecular Mechanisms of Nitric Oxide in Cancer Progression, Signal Transduction, and Metabolism.

Cancer is a complex disease, which not only involves the tumor but its microenvironment comprising different immune cells as well. Nitric oxide (NO) plays specific roles within tumor cells and the microenvironment and determines the rate of cancer progression, therapy efficacy, and patient prognosis. Recent Advances: Key understanding of the processes leading to dysregulated NO flux within the tumor microenvironment over the past decade has provided better understanding of the dichotomous role of NO in cancer and its importance in shaping the immune landscape. It is becoming increasingly evident that nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2)-mediated NO/reactive nitrogen oxide species (RNS) are heavily involved in cancer progression and metastasis in different types of tumor. More recent studies have found that NO from NOS2+ macrophages is required for cancer immunotherapy to be effective. NO/RNS, unlike other molecules, are unique in their ability to target a plethora of oncogenic pathways during cancer progression. In this review, we subcategorize the different levels of NO produced by cells and shed light on the context-dependent temporal effects on cancer signaling and metabolic shift in the tumor microenvironment. Understanding the source of NO and its spaciotemporal profile within the tumor microenvironment could help improve efficacy of cancer immunotherapies by improving tumor infiltration of immune cells for better tumor clearance.

Tumor Suppressor Roles of the Denitrosylase GSNOR.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous pleiotropic molecule that can both induce irreversible oxidative damages and modulate physiological signal transductions by transient protein modifications, the most important of which is the S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues. Being noxious and healthy, the role of NO in cancer is seemingly contradictory, as at low concentrations it mediates tumor growth and proliferation whereas at high concentrations it promotes apoptosis and cancer growth inhibition. However, it is becoming evident that when endogenously produced, such as upon inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activation, NO acts to sustain tumorigenesis. Similarly, although less explored, defects and deficiency in the denitrosylating enzyme S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) have been associated with the development and malignancy of liver and breast cancers, suggesting a primary role for NO signaling-that is, S-nitrosylation, being deeply involved in neoplastic transformation and progression. In this review, we summarize past and recent evidence on the role of S-nitrosylation and GSNOR in different processes that contribute to cell transformation when deregulated, such as DNA damage repair, energetic metabolism, and cell death. We also outline possible S-nitrosylation-targeted proteins that might contribute to tumorigenesis, and, finally, we speculate on the role of GSNOR in regulating the oncogenic effects induced downstream.

Nitric oxide and metastatic cell behaviour

Nitric oxide (NO) is a pleiotropic signalling molecule that subserves a wide variety of basic cellular functions and also manifests itself pathophysiologically. As regards cancer and its progression, however, the reported role of NO appears surprisingly inconsistent. In this review, we focus on metastasis, the process of cancer cell spread and secondary tumour formation. In a 'reductionist' approach, we consider the metastatic cascade to be made up of a series of basic cellular behaviours (such as proliferation, apoptosis, adhesion, secretion migration, invasion and angiogenesis). We evaluate how NO controls such behaviours, in comparison with normal cells. The available information suggests strongly that NO signalling would be expected to regulate these behaviours both positively and negatively and this probably leads to the observed apparent variability in the NO status of cancer cells and tissues. Thus, the role of NO in cancer is more complex than previously thought. A number of suggestions are made, including consideration of novel mechanisms, such as ion channels, in order to achieve a more consistent and integrated understanding of NO signalling in cancer and to realise its clinical potential.

Arginine and Cancer

Arginine is a dibasic, cationic, semiessential amino acid with numerous roles in cellular metabolism. It serves as an intermediate in the urea cycle and as a precursor for protein, polyamine, creatine and nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis. Arginine is conditionally essential since it becomes necessary under periods of growth and after recovery after injury. Arginine also promotes wound healing and functions as a secretagogue stimulating the release of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin, and prolactin. Furthermore, arginine has several immunomodulatory effects such as stimulating T- and natural killer cell activity and influencing pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. The discover that l-arginine is the sole precursor for the multifunctional messenger molecule nitric oxide (NO) led to investigation into the role of arginine in numerous physiologic and pathophysiologic phenomena including cancer. Although NO was first identified in endothelial cells, it is now recognized to be generated by a variety of cell types, including several tumor cell lines and solid human tumors. Unfortunately, the precise role of NO in cancer is poorly understood but it may influence tumor initiation, promotion, and progression, tumor-cell adhesion, apoptosis angiogenesis, differentiation, chemosensitivity, radiosensitivity, and tumor-induced immunosuppression. The biological effects of NO are complex and dependent upon numerous regulatory factors. Further research is necessary to enhance our understanding of the complex mechanisms that regulate NO's role in tumor biology. A better understanding of the role of arginine-derived NO in cancer may lead to novel antineoplastic and chemopreventative strategies.

The role of nitric oxide in cancer.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a pleiotropic regulator, critical to numerous biological processes, including vasodilatation, neurotransmission and macrophage-mediated immunity. The family of nitric oxide synthases (NOS) comprises inducible NOS (iNOS), endothelia (eNOS), and neuronal NOS (nNOS). Interestingly, various studies have shown that all three isoforms can be involved in promoting or inhibiting the etiology of cancer. NOS activity has been detected in tumour cells of various histogenetic origins and has been associated with tumour grade, proliferation rate and expression of important signaling components associated with cancer development such as the oestrogen receptor. It appears that high levels of NOS expression (for example, generated by activated macrophages) may be cytostatic or cytotoxic for tumor cells, whereas low level activity can have the opposite effect and promote tumour growth. Paradoxically therefore, NO (and related reactive nitrogen species) may have both genotoxic and angiogenic properties. Increased NO-generation in a cell may select mutant p53 cells and contribute to tumour angiogenesis by upregulating VEGF. In addition, NO may modulate tumour DNA repair mechanisms by upregulating p53, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). An understanding at the molecular level of the role of NO in cancer will have profound therapeutic implications for the diagnosis and treatment of disease.