Role Of Lysine-specific Demethylase 1 Research Articles

LSD1 promotes prostate cancer reprogramming by repressing TP53 signaling independently of its demethylase function.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone demethylase that promotes stemness and cell survival in cancers such as prostate cancer. Most prostate malignancies are adenocarcinomas with luminal differentiation. However, some tumors undergo cellular reprogramming to a more lethal subset termed neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) with neuronal differentiation. The frequency of NEPC is increasing since the widespread use of potent androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Currently, there are no effective treatments for NEPC. We previously determined that LSD1 promotes survival of prostate adenocarcinoma tumors. However, the role of LSD1 in NEPC is unknown. Here, we determined that LSD1 is highly upregulated in NEPC versus adenocarcinoma patient tumors. LSD1 suppression with RNAi or allosteric LSD1 inhibitors - but not catalytic inhibitors - reduced NEPC cell survival. RNA-Seq analysis revealed that LSD1 represses pathways linked to luminal differentiation, and TP53 was the top reactivated pathway. We confirmed that LSD1 suppressed the TP53 pathway by reducing TP53 occupancy at target genes while LSD1's catalytic function was dispensable for this effect. Mechanistically, LSD1 inhibition disrupted LSD1-HDAC interactions, increasing histone acetylation at TP53 targets. Finally, LSD1 inhibition suppressed NEPC tumor growth in vivo. These findings suggest that blocking LSD1's noncatalytic function may be a promising treatment strategy for NEPC.

The Role of LSD1 and LSD2 in Cancers of the Gastrointestinal System: An Update.

Epigenetic mechanisms are known to play a key role in cancer progression. Specifically, histone methylation involves reversible post-translational modification of histones that govern chromatin structure remodelling, genomic imprinting, gene expression, DNA damage repair, and meiotic crossover recombination, among other chromatin-based activities. Demethylases are enzymes that catalyse the demethylation of their substrate using a flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent amine oxidation process. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and its homolog, lysine-specific demethylase 2 (LSD2), are overexpressed in a variety of human cancer types and, thus, regulate tumour progression. In this review, we focus on the literature from the last 5 years concerning the role of LSD1 and LSD2 in the main gastrointestinal cancers (i.e., gastric cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer).

LSD1 deletion decreases exosomal PD-L1 and restores T-cell response in gastric cancer

BackgroundHistone lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) expression has been shown to be significantly elevated in gastric cancer (GC) and may be associated with the proliferation and metastasis of GC. It has been reported that LSD1 repressed tumor immunity through programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in melanoma and breast cancer. The role of LSD1 in the immune microenvironment of GC is unknown.MethodsExpression LSD1 and PD-L1 in GC patients was analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) and Western blotting. Exosomes were isolated from the culture medium of GC cells using an ultracentrifugation method and characterized by transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), sucrose gradient centrifugation, and Western blotting. The role of exosomal PD-L1 in T-cell dysfunction was assessed by flow cytometry, T-cell killing and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).ResultsThrough in vivo exploration, mouse forestomach carcinoma (MFC) cells with LSD1 knockout (KO) showed significantly slow growth in 615 mice than T-cell-deficient BALB/c nude mice. Meanwhile, in GC specimens, expression of LSD1 was negatively correlated with that of CD8 and positively correlated with that of PD-L1. Further study showed that LSD1 inhibited the response of T cells in the microenvironment of GC by inducing the accumulation of PD-L1 in exosomes, while the membrane PD-L1 stayed constant in GC cells. Using exosomes as vehicles, LSD1 also obstructed T-cell response of other cancer cells while LSD1 deletion rescued T-cell function. It was found that while relying on the existence of LSD1 in donor cells, exosomes can regulate MFC cells proliferation with distinct roles depending on exosomal PD-L1-mediated T-cell immunity in vivo.ConclusionLSD1 deletion decreases exosomal PD-L1 and restores T-cell response in GC; this finding indicates a new mechanism with which LSD1 may regulate cancer immunity in GC and provides a new target for immunotherapy against GC.

LSD1 Inhibition Exerts Its Anti-Leukemic Effect By Recommissioning PU.1- and C/Ebpα-Dependent Enhancers in AML

Epigenetic regulators are recurrently mutated and aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeted therapies designed to inhibit these chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as the histone demethylase lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and the histone methyltransferase DOT1L, have been developed as novel treatment modalities for these often refractory diseases. We aimed to investigate the chromatin changes induced by an irreversible inhibitor of LSD1 (GSK-LSD1) on rMLL+ leukemias. For this, we treated rMLL+ murine AML and patient-derived xenografts with the GSK-LSD1 inhibitor in vivo and assessed chromatin accessibility changes using the Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin with high throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq). Treated mice exhibited a lower proportion of MLL-AF9+ leukemia cells detected in the bone marrow (BM) and signs of myeloid differentiation. Treated mice also had markedly improved survival with a median survival of 78 days vs. control mice (39 days). After 6 weeks of treatment with GSK-LSD1, mice xenotransplanted with human rMLL+ AML samples showed a significant decrease in engraftment and myeloid differentiation. Serial transplantation of murine AML revealed eradication of LSC upon GSK-LSD1 treatment of donor mice. Most importantly, LSD1 inhibition resulted in gain in chromatin accessibility in both murine and PDX-AML cells in vitro as well as in vivo . We then wanted to compare the effect of another anti-leukemic epigenetic drug, also known to induce myeloid differentiation of MLL-AF9+ cells, such as the DOT1L inhibitor EPZ4777. In contrast to GSK-LSD1, EPZ4777 treatment caused a global decrease in chromatin accessibility. The intersection of sites with dynamic accessibility upon DOT1L and LSD1 inhibition showed minimal overlap between the 2 treatments. The distribution of genomic regions with dynamic accessibility upon these drugs indicated that DOT1L inhibition affects a greater number of sites in promoter regions, whereas LSD1 inhibition affected a higher proportion of loci occupied within the intergenic and intronic regions. Furthermore, we sought to identify TF motif signatures at GSK-LSD1-induced dynamic sites. The most highly enriched motifs captured were those for myeloid TFs PU.1 and C/EBPα-β. We then performed ChIP-seq to identify sites of C/EBPα and PU.1 occupancy in the setting of GSK-LSD1 treatment. Interestingly, we observed a redistribution of PU.1 and C/EBPα occupancy upon treatment, consistent with the role of LSD1 in regulating the binding and activity of TFs. While PU.1 ChIPseq signal increased at dynamic ATAC-seq peaks in response to LSD1 inhibition, no increase in C/EBPα occupancy was observed. These dynamic sites also demonstrates GSK-LSD1-dependent co-occupancy of PU.1 and C/EBPα. We next sought to delineate whether PU.1 and C/EBPα are critical for these dynamic changes in chromatin accessibility in response to LSD1 inhibition. We performed ATAC-seq on PU.1 URE KO MLL-AF9 leukemias and C/EBPα KO MLL-AF9 leukemias treated with vehicle or GSK-LSD1. The increase in chromatin accessibility in TF-WT MLL-AF9 leukemias upon GSK-LSD1 was abrogated in both PU.1 URE KO and C/EBPα KO MLL-AF9 leukemia cells. We next assess the impact of TF-depletion on sensitivity to LSD1 inhibition. We treated PU.1 URE KO leukemias cells with GSK-LSD1 for 48 hours in vitro . These cells were more resistant to LSD1 inhibition when compared to PU.1 URE heterozygous and WT AML cells. In vivo, we reported loss of survival benefit upon GSK-LSD1 treatment in PU.1 URE KO MLL-AF9+ mice vs. WT mice. Similarly, C/EBPα KO leukemia cells were more resistant to LSD1 inhibition when compared to WT leukemia cells. After 2 weeks of treatment in vivo, C/EBPα KO leukemic mice also showed no decrease in MLL-AF9 allele burden. Taken together, our comparative investigations into the chromatin-modifying effects of two distinct epigenetic therapies targeting either LSD1 or DOT1L is illustrative of the concept that multiple paths toward myeloid differentiation can potentially be engaged to achieve therapeutic efficacy in AML. Our findings reveal that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 depends on balanced expression of the TFs PU.1 and C/EBPα, which can be used as predictors of response in AML aberrantly expressing these factors. DisclosuresMohammad:GSK: Employment. Ye:Incyte: Employment. Will:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Steidl:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Kruger:GSK: Employment. Armstrong:Imago: Consultancy; Cyteir: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy.

350 Histone demethylase LSD1 is required for LC embryonic development but dispensable for LC maintenance and repopulation

Langerhans cells (LCs), the sole dendritic cell subpopulation in the epidermis, are potent regulators of immune surveillance and tolerance. Unlike conventional DCs, LCs follow unique patterns of development and maintenance under steady and inflamed states. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), known to mediate the demethylation of lysine amino acids on histone proteins, plays a key role in the maintenance and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. However, the role of LSD1 in LC ontogeny and homeostasis remains unknown. To address this, we generated Csf1rCreLSD1fl/fl conditional knockout (Csf1r.LSD1-KO) mice in which LSD1 was deficient in macrophage/monocytes and LC precursors from embryonic stage. We found a robust reduction of LC precursors in Csf1r.LSD1-KO mice at embryonic day 18.5 and postnatal day 0, suggesting that LSD1 is required for LC ontogeny at late embryonic stage. To investigate whether LSD1 is involved in LC maintenance and repopulation, we created CD11cCreLSD1fl/fl conditional knockout (CD11c.LSD1-KO) mice in which LSD1 was deficient in all DC populations including epidermal LCs after birth. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescent staining of skin showed that the frequency and number of LCs were unaltered in 2-week-old and adult CD11c.LSD1-KO mice compared to wild-type mice. Using an ultraviolet C (UVC)-induced skin damage model, we found that long-term LCs were able to repopulate to the inflamed epidermis of CD11c.LSD1-KO mice 2 weeks after UVC treatment. Overall, our data suggests that LSD1 is critical for LC embryonic development, but not required for the LC maintenance at steady state and repopulation under inflammatory conditions.

LSD1 inhibition yields functional insulin-producing cells from human embryonic stem cells

BackgroundHuman embryonic stem cells represent a potentially unlimited source of insulin-producing cells for diabetes therapy. While tremendous progress has been made in directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into IPCs in vitro, the mechanisms controlling its differentiation and function are not fully understood. Previous studies revealed that lysine-specific demethylase 1(LSD1) balanced the self-renewal and differentiation in human induced pluripotent stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. This study aims to explore the role of LSD1 in directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into insulin-producing cells.MethodsHuman embryonic stem cell line H9 was induced into insulin-producing cells by a four-step differentiation protocol. Lentivirus transfection was applied to knockdown LSD1 expression. Immunofluorescence assay and flow cytometry were utilized to check differentiation efficiency. Western blot was used to examine signaling pathway proteins and differentiation-associated proteins. Insulin/C-peptide release was assayed by ELISA. Statistical analysis between groups was carried out with one-way ANOVA tests or a student’s t test when appropriate.ResultsInhibition or silencing LSD1 promotes the specification of pancreatic progenitors and finally the commitment of functional insulin-producing β cells; Moreover, inhibition or silencing LSD1 activated ERK signaling and upregulated pancreatic progenitor associated genes, accelerating pre-maturation of pancreatic progenitors, and conferred the NKX6.1+ population with better proliferation ability. IPCs with LSD1 inhibitor tranylcypromine treatment displayed enhanced insulin secretion in response to glucose stimulation.ConclusionsWe identify a novel role of LSD1 inhibition in promoting IPCs differentiation from hESCs, which would be emerged as potential intervention for generation of functional pancreatic β cells to cure diabetes.

Next-generation sequencing reveals a novel role of lysine-specific demethylase 1 in adhesion of rhabdomyosarcoma cells.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), a histone lysine demethylase with the main specificity for H3K4me2, has been shown to be overexpressed in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) tumor samples. However, its role in RMS biology is not yet well understood. Here, we identified a new role of LSD1 in regulating adhesion of RMS cells. Genetic knockdown of LSD1 profoundly suppressed clonogenic growth in a panel of RMS cell lines, whereas LSD1 proved to be largely dispensable for regulating cell death and short-term survival. Combined RNA and ChIP-sequencing performed to analyze RNA expression and histone methylation at promoter regions revealed a gene set enrichment for adhesion-associated terms upon LSD1 knockdown. Consistently, LSD1 knockdown significantly reduced adhesion to untreated surfaces. Importantly, precoating of the plates with the adhesives collagen I or fibronectin rescued this reduced adhesion of LSD1 knockdown cells back to levels of control cells. Using KEGG pathway analysis, we identified 17 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LSD1 knockdown cells related to adhesion processes, which were validated by qRT-PCR. Combining RNA and ChIP-sequencing results revealed that, within this set of genes, SPP1, C3AR1, ITGA10 and SERPINE1 also exhibited increased H3K4me2 levels at their promoter regions in LSD1 knockdown compared to control cells. Indeed, LSD1 ChIP experiments confirmed enrichment of LSD1 at their promoter regions, suggesting a direct transcriptional regulation by LSD1. By identifying a new role of LSD1 in the modulation of cell adhesion and clonogenic growth of RMS cells, these findings highlight the importance of LSD1 in RMS.

LSD1 inhibition suppresses the growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via upregulating P21 signaling

Histone lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been implicated in the disease progression of several types of solid tumors. This study provides the first evidence showing that LSD1 overexpression occurred in 62.6% (224/358) of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). LSD1 expression was associated with the progression of ccRCC, as indicated by TNM stage (P=0.006), especially tumor stage (P=0.017) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.030). High LSD1 expression proved to be an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (P<0.001) and recurrence-free survival (P<0.001) of ccRCC patients. We further show that LSD1 inhibition by siRNA knockdown or using the small molecule inhibitor SP2509 suppressed the growth of ccRCC in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, inhibition of LSD1 decreased the H3K4 demethylation at the CDKN1A gene promoter, which was associated with P21 upregulation and cell cycle arrest at G1/S in ccRCC cells. Our findings provide new mechanistic insights into the role of LSD1 in ccRCC and suggest the therapeutic potential of LSD1 inhibitors in ccRCC treatment.

Abstract LB-240: LSD1 activates a lethal prostate cancer gene network independently of its demethylase function

Abstract Background: Medical castration that interferes with androgen receptor (AR) function is the principal treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, clinical progression is universal, and tumors with AR-independent resistance mechanisms appear to be increasing in frequency. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new treatments targeting molecular pathways enriched in lethal prostate cancer. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone demethylase and important regulator of gene expression. Here we describe a distinct role of LSD1 as a driver of proliferation and survival of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells independently of its demethylase function and of the AR. Methods: We used loss of function studies to determine the importance of LSD1 for survival of prostate cancer cells. To identify transcriptional networks that contribute to cell survival, we suppressed LSD1 with RNAi and performed gene expression profiling. To determine the importance of LSD1's demethylase function in regulation of target genes, we measured LSD1's canonical histone substrates (H3K4me2 and H3K9me2) using genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing and measured the effect of ectopically expressed wild type or catalytically deficient LSD1 on cell survival and target gene expression. We used mass spectrometry (MS) to identify important LSD1 protein complex members. Finally, we used multiple biochemical and cellular assays and an in vivo study to confirm the mechanism of action of a small molecule inhibitor that targets critical, non-canonical functions of LSD1 in CRPC cells. Results: Cell viability assays demonstrated that LSD1 is important for proliferation and survival of CRPC cells independently of the AR. Gene expression profiles demonstrated that LSD1 activates androgen-independent genes that are enriched in lethal human tumors. Importantly, our global epigenomic studies and biochemical experiments demonstrated that LSD1's demethylase function was dispensable for these effects, while our MS studies identified cooperating LSD1 binding proteins. Finally, we identified a reversible small molecule inhibitor of LSD1 that blocked critical, demethylase-independent functions in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that LSD1 promotes survival of prostate cancer cells, including those that are castration-resistant, independently of its demethylase function and of the AR. Importantly, this effect is explained in part by activation of a lethal prostate cancer gene network in collaboration with specific binding proteins. Finally, that a reversible small molecule LSD1 inhibitor blocks important demethylase-independent functions and suppresses CRPC cell viability demonstrates the potential of LSD1 inhibition in this disease. Citation Format: Archana Sehrawat, Dae-Hwan Kim, Lina Gao, Yuliang Wang, Armand Bankhead, Shannon McWeeney, Carly J. King, Jacob Schwartzman, Junior Tayou, Joshua Urrutia, William H. Bisson, Daniel J. Coleman, Sunil K. Joshi, David A. Sampson, Sheila Weinmann, Bhaskar VS Kallakury, Deborah L. Berry, Reina Haque, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Sunil Sharma, Jared Bearss, Tomasz M. Beer, George V. Thomas, Laura M. Heiser, Joshi J. Alumkal. LSD1 activates a lethal prostate cancer gene network independently of its demethylase function [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-240.

LSD1, a double-edged sword, confers dynamic chromatin regulation but commonly promotes aberrant cell growth.

Histone-modifying enzymes play a critical role in chromatin remodeling and are essential for influencing several genome processes such as gene expression and DNA repair, replication, and recombination. The discovery of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), the first identified histone demethylase, dramatically revolutionized research in the field of epigenetics. LSD1 plays a pivotal role in a wide range of biological operations, including development, cellular differentiation, embryonic pluripotency, and disease (for example, cancer). This mini-review focuses on the role of LSD1 in chromatin regulatory complexes, its involvement in epigenetic changes throughout development, and its importance in physiological and pathological processes.

Abstract 2406: LSD1 promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer cell survival independently of the androgen receptor and of histone demethylation

Abstract Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or interference with androgen receptor (AR) function is the principal treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, progression is universal, and therapies following the emergence of castration resistance do not offer durable control of the disease. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone demethylase and a key regulator of gene expression in cancer. Prior work demonstrates that LSD1 may act as a cofactor of the AR in androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells. In this report, we describe a distinct role of LSD1 as a driver of proliferation and survival of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells independently of the AR and independently of histone demethylation. Methods: We used gain and loss of function studies to determine the importance of LSD1 for survival of prostate cancer cells. To identify transcriptional networks that contribute to cell survival, we suppressed LSD1 with RNAi and measured gene expression changes with microarrays. To determine the importance of histone demethylation in regulation of these gene networks, we suppressed LSD1 and measured levels of LSD1 canonical histone substrates (H3K4me2 and H3K9me2) genome-wide with chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing. Results: Cell viability assays demonstrated that LSD1 is important for proliferation and survival of CRPC cells independently of the AR. Microarray studies demonstrated that LSD1 activates androgen-independent genes that comprise cell cycle and embryonic stem cell maintenance gene sets that are enriched in lethal human tumors. Importantly, our global epigenomic studies after LSD1 suppression demonstrated that LSD1 activates these gene sets independently of demethylation of its canonical histone substrates. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that LSD1 promotes CRPC cell survival independently of the AR and suggest that LSD1 regulates key pathways in CRPC through demethylation of non-histone substrates or via a scaffold function―mechanisms we are currently investigating. In summary, LSD1 contributes to CRPC cell survival through non-canonical mechanisms and represents an attractive therapeutic target in lethal prostate cancer. Citation Format: Archana Sehrawat, Lina Gao, Junior Tayou, Armand Bankhead, Laura M. Heiser, Carly J. King, Yuliang Wang, Jacob Schwartzman, Joshua Urrutia, Daniel J. Coleman, Sheila Weinmann, Bhaskar V. Kallakury, Deborah L. Berry, Reina Haque, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Tomasz M. Beer, George V. Thomas, Shannon McWeeney, Joshi J. Alumkal. LSD1 promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer cell survival independently of the androgen receptor and of histone demethylation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2406. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2406

Abstract B81: Analogues of the chromenone namoline as inhibitors of lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1)

Abstract Since it had been discovered in 2004, lysine-specific-demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been emphasized as a potential target for anticancer drugs. The physiological role of LSD1 is versatile which can be seen in its function in different LSD1-related protein complexes such as CoREST with the androgen receptor. Interacting with those various molecular domains, LSD1 leads to e.g. a regulation of gene expression and control of hematopoietic differentiation. So it is hardly surprising that several LSD1 inhibitors are already in clinical trials. Namoline has been identified in collaboration with other groups using a bioinformatics approach based on active site similarity and a focused library screen. This hit impairs LSD1 activity in-vitro and in-vivo and is a promising starting compound for further investigations. Our latest developed heterogeneous assay-systems are resistant against auto-fluorescence and maybe will give us further insights into biophysiological interactions between inhibitors and the targeted enzyme. Based upon on this, we report structure-activity studies of namoline and its improved analogues which lead up to a 40-fold increased potency and retained selectivity over MAO-A and B. We show that namoline and its potent analogues have antiproliferative activity in Rhabdomyosarcoma cells with slightly improved efficacy for the new analogues. Citation Format: Johannes Schulz-Fincke, Martin L. Schmitt, Luca Carlino, Tinka Haydn, Dominica Willmann, Eric Metzger, Simone Fulda, Roland Schüle, Wolfgang Sippl, Manfred Jung. Analogues of the chromenone namoline as inhibitors of lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B81.

Abstract 3838: Functional crosstalk between histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) as a novel therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Abstract Our previous work has shown that HDAC5 knockdown led to significant increase of H3K4me2 in the TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231, suggesting a potential role of HDAC5 in regulating LSD1 activity in breast cancer. In this study, we demonstrated that HDAC5 physically interacts with LSD1 in MDA-MB-231 cells. Overexpression of HDAC5 increased LSD1 protein level through a reduction of LSD1 polyubiquitination. siRNA-mediated knockdown of HDAC5 mRNA, but not other class II HDACs or LSD1-containing complex members (HDAC1, HDAC2 and CoREST), significantly decreased LSD1 protein expression and half-life. HDAC5 overexpression reduced levels of H3K4me1/2, suggesting that HDAC5 acts as a positive regulator of LSD1-mediated H3K4 demethylation activity. Enhanced proliferation mediated by HDAC5 overexpression in MDA-MB-231 cells was diminished by LSD1-KD, suggesting a critical role of LSD1 in regulating oncogenic activity of HDAC5. We also observed that high-grade tumorigenic MCF10A-CA1a cells (triple negative) expressed higher levels of LSD1 and HDAC5 compared with parental counterpart MCF10A cells. By gain- and loss-of-function studies using this TNBC progression model, we observed that HDAC5 possesses a critical oncogenic function in driving TNBC development by blocking LSD1 protein degradation and re-shaping epigenetic landscape. Several HDAC inhibitors were tested for their ability to inhibit LSD1 and HDAC5 interaction. Treatment with sulforaphane, a natural HDAC inhibitor found in cruciferous vegetables, blocked the association of HDAC5 and LSD1 through down-regulation of HDAC5 mRNA and protein expression that led to LSD1 protein destabilization. Sulforaphane treatment also re-expressed a unique subset of tumor suppressor genes (RGS16, BIK, PCDH1, CDKN1a, ING1, etc), which are abnormally silenced in TNBC cells, but are expressed in other breast cancer subtypes and normal breast cells. Addition of a novel LSD1 inhibitor, HCI-2509, significantly promoted antineoplastic efficacy of sulforaphane in breast cancer cells, and TNBC cells were more susceptible than other subtypes to the combination therapy. In an in vivo study, while treatment with either sulforaphane or HCI-2509 alone each displayed significant anti-tumor effects against MDA-MB-231 xenografts, combined treatment with both compounds exhibited synergistic inhibitory effect on tumor growth in the MDA-MB-231 xenografts. Taken together, these results suggest that HDAC5 promotes LSD1 protein stabilization, leading to a dysregulated chromatin landscape which functions as an antibraking system in TNBC development. Crosstalk between LSD1 and HDAC5 may represent a novel and effective therapeutic target for this devastating disease. (Supported by DOD W81XWH-14-1-0237/W81XWH-14-1-0238, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and UPCI Core Grant NIH P30CA047904) Citation Format: Chunyu Cao, Shauna Vasilatos, Steffi Oesterreich, Nancy E. Davidson, Yi Huang. Functional crosstalk between histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) as a novel therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3838. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3838

LSD1 controls metastasis of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells through PXN and LPAR6.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) was shown to control gene expression and cell proliferation of androgen-dependent prostate cancer (PCa) cells, whereas the role of LSD1 in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer remains elusive. Here, we show that depletion of LSD1 leads to increased migration and invasion of androgen-independent PCa cells. Transcriptome and cistrome analyses reveal that LSD1 regulates expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6 (LPAR6) and cytoskeletal genes including the focal adhesion adaptor protein paxillin (PXN). Enhanced LPAR6 signalling upon LSD1 depletion promotes migration with concomitant phosphorylation of PXN. In mice LPAR6 overexpression enhances, whereas knockdown of LPAR6 abolishes metastasis of androgen-independent PCa cells. Taken together, we uncover a novel mechanism of how LSD1 controls metastasis and identify LPAR6 as a promising therapeutic target to treat metastatic prostate cancer.

Abstract 3679: Inhibition of LSD1 disrupts global EWS/ETS transcriptional function in Ewing sarcoma

Abstract Ewing sarcoma is an aggressive pediatric bone tumor characterized by an absolute reliance on the transcriptional activity of the EWS/ETS family of transcription factor fusion oncoproteins. The most common fusion is EWS/FLI, present in 85-95% of cases, though less common fusions include EWS/ERG, EWS/ETV1, EWS/ETV4 and EWS/FEV. EWS/FLI utilizes lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) as member of the NuRD complex to mediate transcriptional repression of critical tumor suppressors in Ewing sarcoma. LSD1 overexpression has been observed in clinical samples from Ewing sarcoma patients and small molecule blockade of LSD1 using tranylcypromine has been suggested as a therapeutic approach for Ewing sarcoma. We therefore evaluated the effects of LSD1 inhibition with the small molecule inhibitor, HCI-2509, in both in vitro and in vivo models of Ewing sarcoma. HCI-2509 is an LSD1 inhibitor with a Ki of ∼30 nM and multiple Ewing sarcoma cell lines show IC50s in cell viability assays from 500 nM-1 μM. Using RNA-seq, we show that HCI-2509 dramatically reverses both the up- and downregulated transcriptional profiles of both EWS/FLI and EWS/ERG accompanied by the induction of apoptosis and disruption of oncogenic phenotypes modulated by EWS/FLI. We further developed a 9-gene panel based on the RNA-seq data to assess the transcriptional phenotype of HCI-2509 in additional cell lines and showed that it HCI-2509 disrupted both EWS/FLI-activated and -repressed genes similarly across the tested Ewing sarcoma cell lines. HCI-2509 impaired transformation of Ewing sarcoma cell lines in colony forming assays with IC50s from from 25 nM-1 μM. Notably, HCI-2509 displayed single-agent efficacy in multiple xenograft models. We investigated the PK/PD relationship using tumor histone H3K4 and H3K9 methylation. Taken together, these data suggest that epigenetic modulation through LSD1 inhibition may be a therapeutic strategy for Ewing sarcoma, and highlight a critical dual role for LSD1 in the oncogenic transcriptional activity of EWS/ETS proteins. Citation Format: Emily Rose Theisen, Savita Sankar, Jared Bearss, Timothy Mulvihill, Venkataswamy Sorna, Sunil Sharma, Stephen L. Lessnick. Inhibition of LSD1 disrupts global EWS/ETS transcriptional function in Ewing sarcoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3679. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3679

Lysine-specific demethylase 1-mediated demethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 contributes to interleukin 1β-induced microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 expression in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes.

IntroductionMicrosomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 (mPGES-1) catalyzes the terminal step in the biosynthesis of PGE2, a critical mediator in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis (OA). Histone methylation plays an important role in epigenetic gene regulation. In this study, we investigated the roles of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation in interleukin 1β (IL-1β)-induced mPGES-1 expression in human chondrocytes.MethodsChondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β, and the expression of mPGES-1 mRNA was evaluated using real-time RT-PCR. H3K9 methylation and the recruitment of the histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) to the mPGES-1 promoter were evaluated using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. The role of LSD1 was further evaluated using the pharmacological inhibitors tranylcypromine and pargyline and small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated gene silencing. The LSD1 level in cartilage was determined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.ResultsThe induction of mPGES-1 expression by IL-1β correlated with decreased levels of mono- and dimethylated H3K9 at the mPGES-1 promoter. These changes were concomitant with the recruitment of the histone demethylase LSD1. Treatment with tranylcypromine and pargyline, which are potent inhibitors of LSD1, prevented IL-1β-induced H3K9 demethylation at the mPGES-1 promoter and expression of mPGES-1. Consistently, LSD1 gene silencing with siRNA prevented IL-1β-induced H3K9 demethylation and mPGES-1 expression, suggesting that LSD1 mediates IL-1β-induced mPGES-1 expression via H3K9 demethylation. We show that the level of LSD1 was elevated in OA compared to normal cartilage.ConclusionThese results indicate that H3K9 demethylation by LSD1 contributes to IL-1β-induced mPGES-1 expression and suggest that this pathway could be a potential target for pharmacological intervention in the treatment of OA and possibly other arthritic conditions.

Abstract A46: LSD1 globally mediates epigenetic modifications on androgen receptor-dependent enhancers

Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) belongs to nuclear receptor superfamily and plays pivotal roles in development of prostate and prostate cancer. The lignded AR binds to AR responsive elements (ARE) on the enhancers and mediates the transcription activity. AR binding on chromatin appears to depend on the binding of pioneer factor FOXA1, which recognizes the active sites marked with high level of mono- or di-methylation of Histon 3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1-2) and then make the site accessible for AR binding. However, the in depth mechanism how FOXA1 opens the enhancer and whether this results in further chromatin modification remains unclear. Through ChIP-seq studies coupled with gene expression array, we have found LSD1 (lysine specific demethylase 1) together with its binding partner CoRest were recruited by FOXA1 to the AR-dependent enhancer and its histone demethylation functions were then activated by liganded AR. This results in the loss of methylation marks and activation of gene transcription but not affecting AR binding or AR-mediated nucleosome dynamics. In contrast to this activator function, LSD1 can also formed corepressor complex to suppress the transcription of a subset of genes. This comprehensive study clearly suggested distinct roles of LSD1 as a coactivator versus a corepressor in different protein complexes therefore to mediate different cell functions. Citation Format: Changmeng Cai, Housheng Hansen He, Myles Brown, Steven P. Balk. LSD1 globally mediates epigenetic modifications on androgen receptor-dependent enhancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer; Jun 19-22, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(13 Suppl):Abstract nr A46.

Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 by Epigenetic Modifications and the Development of Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetes activates retinal matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and MMP-9 damages the mitochondria and augments capillary cell apoptosis. Our aim is to elucidate the mechanism responsible for MMP-9 activation. Histone modifications and recruitment of the nuclear transcriptional factor-κB (p65 subunit) at the MMP-9 promoter and the activity of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) were measured in the retina from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The role of LSD1 in MMP-9 activation was investigated in isolated retinal endothelial cells transfected with LSD1 small interfering RNA (siRNA). The results were confirmed in the retina from human donors with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes decreased histone H3 dimethyl lysine 9 (H3K9me2) and increased acetyl H3K9 (Ac-H3K9) and p65 at the retinal MMP-9 promoter. LSD1 enzyme activity and its transcripts were elevated. LSD1 siRNA ameliorated the glucose-induced decrease in H3K9me2 and increase in p65 at the MMP-9 promoter, and prevented MMP-9 activation, mitochondrial damage, and cell apoptosis. Human donors with diabetic retinopathy had similar epigenetic changes at the MMP-9 promoter. Thus, activated LSD1 hypomethylates H3K9 at the MMP-9 promoter and this frees up that lysine 9 for acetylation. Increased Ac-H3K9 facilitates the recruitment of p65, resulting in MMP-9 activation and mitochondrial damage. Thus, the regulation of LSD1 by molecular or pharmacological means has the potential to retard the development of diabetic retinopathy.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) synergistically repress proinflammatory cytokines and classical complement pathway components

Histone modifying enzymes confer epigenetic marks, directing the changes in gene expression required for diverse cellular processes. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) functions as a transcriptional coregulator by demethylating histone H3 on lysine 4 and lysine 9. Analyzing transcriptomes on microarrays, we identified genes which represent inflammatory-related targets of LSD1. We demonstrate a repressive role of LSD1 in proinflammatory cytokine expression such as IL1α, IL1β, IL6 and IL8 and classical complement components. Consistently, LSD1 occupies and regulates the promoter of these genes. In addition, we demonstrate that HDAC1 and LSD1 synergistically regulate these inflammatory-related genes. Our data reveal a novel role for LSD1 in suppressing immune responses.