Role Of Botulinum Toxin Injection Research Articles

When Should Headache Specialists Hold a Needle? The Role of Botulinum Toxin Injections and Occipital Nerve Blocks

When Should Headache Specialists Hold a Needle? The Role of Botulinum Toxin Injections and Occipital Nerve Blocks

Role of botulinum toxin injection in treatment of achalasia

Role of botulinum toxin injection in treatment of achalasia

The role of botulinum toxin injections in depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in patients with cervical dystonia

The role of botulinum toxin injections in depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in patients with cervical dystonia

The Role of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Esophageal Motility Disorders.

The advancement of high-resolution esophageal manometry has led to improvement in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We reviewed the recent medical literature regarding the use of botulinum toxin (BTx) injections in the esophagus and the indications, current outcomes, and reported complications of this therapy. The response rates of BTx injection therapy vary depending on the esophageal motility disorder. Studies have shown that response is transient in achalasia patients and given the more effective therapies available, it is only recommended in patients who are not surgical candidates. In nonachalasia patients, studies of BTx injections have demonstrated improvement in dysphagia symptoms in patients with spastic disorders, though studies are small and largely retrospective. The available literature showed a variable response to BTx in esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) and non-cardiac chest pain patients. Despite advances in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, there is a need for further research in patient selection for esophageal BTx, dose and injection location, and disease-specific outcomes. Placebo-controlled trials are crucial to evaluate BTx efficacy and duration of response. Esophageal-directed BTx injections are beneficial in improving dysphagia in spastic motility disorders and in achalasia patients who are elderly or have multiple co-morbidities. There is a lack of evidence to support use in patients with EGJOO and non-cardiac chest pain, or for young or healthy achalasia patients.

Role of Botulinum toxin injection in neurological problems: A Short Review

Botulinum Toxin (BoNT), a neurotoxin known for many years for its lethal nature has been in use for many cosmetic purposes for last many years. Its use in many medical problems especially chronic neurological problems has been well established in recent years. BoNT is a useful symptomatic treatment for many neurological disorders, and is emerging as one of the leading modes of treatments in the new subspecialty in neurology called “Interventional neurology.” We have also been using BoNT regularly for therapeutic purposes in different neurological diseases with good success rate for last few years. We think use of BoNT-A needs to be encouraged in our country to provide relief to the patients suffering from many of the chronic disabling neurological problems.Nepal Journal of Neuroscience 12:3-7, 2015

Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Excessive Gingival Display: A Systematic Review.

To date, no standardized minimally invasive approach for the treatment of excessive gingival display exists. This systematic review aims to assess the evidence in the literature regarding the role of botulinum toxin injection in the management of gummy smile. All publications through December 2014 and pertaining to the subject were electronically searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles were manually screened. Out of 33 articles, 29 were discarded based on exclusion criteria. Although all 4 selected articles were in line with a role for botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of gummy smiles and the importance of targeting the levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscle, studies differed in the type and the dose of toxin administered and the technique adopted. Injection with botulinum toxin is a novel, safe, and cosmetically effective treatment for gummy smile when performed by experienced practitioners. However, further randomized controlled trials are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

Effects of botulinum toxin A on patient‐specific keloid fibroblasts in vitro

To test whether therapeutic effects of botulinum toxin A on patient- specific keloid tissue can be reproduced on the cellular level. Specifically, effects on cell proliferation and expression of growth factors and cytokines relevant for wound healing were to be tested. Experimental study including patient specific cell cultures of keloids. Patient-specific keloid tissue was tested in a cell culture model for effects of botulinum toxin incubation on cell proliferation and expression of the following cytokines and growth factors: IL-6 (interleukin-6), VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β). None of the tested parameters of human keloid tissue were affected by botulinum toxin A incubation. The present study does not add evidence to suggest a significant therapeutic role of botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of keloids. N/A.

The role of Botulinum toxin injection in the management of achalasia

Botulinum toxin injection into the lower esophageal sphincter is an established therapy for the treatment of achalasia. This review will highlight recent studies that shed light on the role of Botulinum toxin injection in the management of achalasia. Recent studies have shown that Botulinum toxin injection is the most common initial endoscopic therapy for achalasia, most likely due to its safety and ease of administration. However, this trend represents a deviation from recent guidelines which consider Botulinum toxin injection less efficacious than alternative treatments like pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Over the past decade, multiple commercial formulations of Botulinum toxin injection have been introduced, but the techniques, indications, and therapeutic efficacy for Botulinum toxin have largely remained unchanged. This review will evaluate recent guidelines, consensus articles, meta-analyses, and landmark studies to expound on the short and long-term efficacy of Botulinum toxin, injection dosages, and technique, as well as its efficacy compared to pneumatic dilation, myotomy, and combination therapy. Despite its relatively poor long-term efficacy, Botulinum toxin injection continues to play an important role in elderly patients with comorbidities and as salvage therapy for achalasia.

The role of botulinum toxin injections in the management of muscle overactivity of the lower limb

Muscle overactivity is common in patients with adult onset central nervous system damage. It can produce significant disablement in conjunction with other impairments such as adaptive soft tissue shortening and loss of muscle strength. Muscle overactivity is not evenly distributed throughout the body; across joints there is frequently imbalance between agonist and antagonist, producing abnormal joint postures and movement patterns. Due to the asymmetric nature of the abnormal activity across joints, in general we recommend local treatment targeting the more overactive of the two agonists, rather than systemic treatment. Considerable experience with the use of botulinum toxin, both serotypes A and B, in the treatment of muscle overactivity has been accumulated in the last two decades through pragmatic clinical practice and open label studies, supported by an increasing number of randomized controlled trials. In most cases, it is important to use botulinum toxin injection for treatment of muscle overactivity in the setting of wider rehabilitation goals and interventions. Focal and partial blocks with botulinum toxin should be used as a component of a general neurorehabilitation programme rather than as an alternative to other treatments. We review the evidence supporting the use of botulinum toxin to treat muscle overactivity in the lower limb, present practical guidelines on when and how to use botulinum toxin and provide direction for future research.

Electrostimulation for Promoting Recovery of Movement or Functional Ability After Stroke

The aim of this review was to determine whether electrostimulation to provide neuromuscular retraining improved motor ability and the ability to undertake activities of daily living. This review did not investigate the use of electrostimulation as a neuroprosthesis/orthosis.1 We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) ( The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004 ), MEDLINE (1996 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), CINAHL (1982 to January 2004), AMED–Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (1985 to January 2004), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), REHABDATA, and the ISI Science Citation Index (1981 to 2003). …

The role of botulinum toxin injection and upper esophageal sphincter myotomy in treating oropharyngeal dysphagia.

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin (BoTox) injection in the cricopharyngeus muscle (CP) and CP myotomy in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) and to identify factors predicting the outcome of these treatments. The study involved patients with persistent OPD despite 2-6 months of rehabilitation, who all underwent clinical evaluation, esophageal manometry, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and videofluoroscopy (VFS). Patients received 5-10 BoTox units injections in the CP, identified by electromyography. Surgical myotomy of the upper esophageal sphincter was performed when dysphagia persisted after two BoTox injections. After treatment, patients were reevaluated with clinical interviews and VFS. The study population included 21 patients (15 mean and 6 women; median age, 68 years), classified into three groups, based on the etiology of their OPD: eight (38%) had central nervous system abnormalities, five (24%) had peripheral nerve disease, and eight (38%) were classified as idiopathic. The median time since the onset of dysphagia was 18 months. Thirteen of 21 patients (62%) needed supplemental/total gastrostomy feeding, and 5 of 21 (24%) had tracheostomy. One patient died, on posttreatment day 7, due to massive aspiration. No other BoTox-related complications were observed. After BoTox injection, dysphagia improved in 9 of 21 (43%) patients. Severely altered VFS findings and CP incoordination or low activity predicted BoTox failure at multivariate analysis. Dysphagia improved in 8 of 11 (72.7%) patients who failed to respond to BoTox and underwent myotomy. A mild impairment of VFS findings and a higher pressure of pharyngeal contractions best predicted response to BoTox with or without myotomy. BoTox injection can be used as the first therapeutic option in patients with OPD: it is safe and simple and relieves dysphagia in 43% of cases. If BoTox fails, CP myotomy can be offered to patients with preserved oral and tongue activity at VFS and an intact bolus propulsion ability on manometry.

Relief by botulinum toxin of voiding dysfunction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Objectives To evaluate the therapeutic role of botulinum toxin injection in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. After a baseline evaluation, each participant received 4 mL of solution injected into the prostate gland. Patients in the control group received saline solution and patients in the treated group received 200 U of botulinum toxin A. The outcome of each group was evaluated by comparing the symptom scores, serum prostate-specific antigen concentration, prostate volume, postvoid residual urine volume, and peak urinary flow rates. Results Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled. No local complications or systemic side effects were observed in any patient. After 2 months, 13 patients in the treated group and 3 in the control group had subjective symptomatic relief ( P = 0.0007). In patients who received botulinum toxin, the symptom score was reduced by 65% compared with baseline values and the serum prostate-specific antigen concentration by 51% from baseline. In patients who received saline, the symptom score and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration were not significantly changed compared with the baseline values and 1-month values. Follow-up averaged 19.6 ± 3.8 months. Conclusions Botulinum toxin injected into the prostate seems to be a promising approach for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is safe, effective, and well-tolerated. Furthermore, it is not related to the patient’s willingness to complete treatment.