Role Of Aspirin In Prevention Research Articles

Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

During the past 30 years, several developments have occurred in the antiplatelet field, including the role of aspirin in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. There have been several attempts to develop antiplatelet drugs more effective and safer than aspirin and a shift in emphasis from efficacy to safety, advocating aspirin-free antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence supporting a chemopreventive effect of low-dose aspirin against colorectal (and other digestive tract) cancer has also strengthened. The aim of this article is to revisit the role of aspirin in the prevention of atherothrombosis across the cardiovascular risk continuum, in view of developments in the antiplatelet field. The review will offer a clinical perspective on aspirin's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. This will be followed by a detailed discussion of its clinical efficacy and safety.

The Role of Aspirin for Preeclampsia Prevention in Women with Diabetes.

A diagnosis of type I or type 2 diabetes confers heightened risk for virtually every obstetric and perinatal complication, with the incidence of superimposed preeclampsia representing a particularly high-risk scenario. Over the past three decades, studies have investigated the role of aspirin in preeclampsia prevention, yielding some promising results for certain at-risk groups, yet unconvincing evidence of benefit among women with pre-pregnancy diabetes. The purpose of this review is to present the current evidence base for aspirin use in pregnancy as a means of mitigating preeclampsia risk in the setting of pregestational type I or type 2 diabetes. Meta-analysis data examining low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in at-risk and low-risk women has demonstrated modest benefit, but subanalyses of cohorts with diabetes have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect. Evidence is emerging that indicates a benefit only among women who initiate aspirin therapy prior to 16weeks' gestation, and uncertainty exists surrounding the effective dose. In light of equipoise surrounding the potential role of aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in women with diabetes, current research is targeted at determining clinical efficacy of aspirin in this high-risk obstetric population.

Aspirin Use and Awareness for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Hispanics: Prevalence and Associations with Health Behavior Beliefs.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) persists as the leading cause of death and disability in many Americans including Hispanics. Primary prevention for CVD may be achieved through regular aspirin use in high risk individuals. This study examined regular aspirin use and specific attitudes and social norms toward CVD and aspirin use within an urban Hispanic population in Minnesota. A sample of primary prevention Hispanics aged 45-79years were surveyed about CVD history and risk factors, aspirin use, demographic characteristics, and health beliefs and social norms in relation to CVD and aspirin. Relative risk estimation using Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to examine associations with aspirin use. In this sample of 152 Hispanics (55% women), the mean age was 53years, 70% had a regular healthcare provider, and 22% used aspirin. Aspirin discussions with a regular healthcare provider were strongly associated with aspirin use (adjusted risk ratio 3.02, 95% CI 1.20-7.60). There was a positive association between health beliefs and social norms that affirm preventive behaviors and aspirin use (adjusted linear risk ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.45) while uncertainty about the role of aspirin for individual use and in the community was negatively associated with aspirin use (adjusted linear risk ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03). This growing population may benefit from health education about CVD risk and the role of aspirin in prevention.

Investigating the role of early low-dose aspirin in diabetes: A phase III multicentre double-blinded placebo-controlled randomised trial of aspirin therapy initiated in the first trimester of diabetes pregnancy

BackgroundPreeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight represent key contributing factors to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancies complicated by type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of these complications, which are purported to be largely attributed to placental dysfunction. Studies investigating a potential role for aspirin therapy in optimizing perinatal outcome have consistently failed to demonstrate a benefit among women with pre-existing diabetes, and yet widespread aspirin administration has become common practice in many centres. This study seeks to examine the effect of aspirin therapy, administered from the first trimester until 36 weeks gestation, on perinatal outcome in women with established pre-pregnancy diabetes. Our hypothesis is that aspirin therapy will reduce complications mediated by placental dysfunction, and improve perinatal outcomes. MethodsThis phase III double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial will be conducted in seven tertiary-level perinatology centres in Ireland. Consenting participants who meet all eligibility criteria will be allocated randomly to either aspirin 150mg once daily or matching placebo, commenced between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks. Allocation will take place electronically using software by Clininfo with randomization tables provided by the trial biostatistician. The primary outcome will be a composite clinical measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, preterm birth before 34 weeks, birthweight below the 10th centile or perinatal mortality). This trial has been set up such that it is parallel in design and is a superiority study. No participants have been recruited yet. The trial has been registered with Eudra Clinical Trials - EudraCT Number 2018-000770-29. Funding for this trial was granted by the Health research Board (HRB) 1/9/2017(DIFA-2017-026). DiscussionAspirin therapy has been investigated for the prevention of preeclampsia owing to its reduction on thromboxane production. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of aspirin on perinatal outcome amongst women with type I or type II diabetes. It is plausible that the failure to observe benefit to date, among the limited aspirin studies that have included participants with diabetes, may be a consequence of aspirin initiation too late in pregnancy to exert any effect on placentation. We believe that if aspirin is to be used for the prevention of placental dysfunction, it must be initiated before the second active phase of trophoblast invasion, which takes place from 14 weeks’ gestation onwards. No randomized trials investigating the role of aspirin in prevention of preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes have previously initiated treatment in the first trimester, the gestational period at which it is most likely to exert an effect on placentation. Trial RegistrationEnduraCT Number 2018-000770-29, Registered 21/2/2018.

PI3K mutation and effect of aspirin use in breast cancer.

e23209 Background: Increasing literature suggests a protective role of aspirin in breast cancer. PI3K mutation is prevalent in 30% of estrogen receptor positive and 50% of HER2 receptor positive breast cancers. Aspirin inhibits prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) through down-regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). A study in colorectal cancer demonstrated that regular use of aspirin was associated with superior survival among patients with PI3K mutated tumors. The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine the presence of PI3K mutation in breast cancer tissue in patients who used aspirin during treatment, and compare survival between those with and without PI3K mutations. Methods: Among 1259 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between year 2002 to 2013 at Augusta University (AU), 47 patients who used at least 81 mg of aspirin daily during cancer treatment were identified, and their breast cancer tissue blocks were analyzed for PI3K mutation by gene sequencing technique. Genomic DNAs were extracted from formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissues using GeneRead DNA FFPE kit (Qiagen) and sequenced on Miseq sequencer (Illumina). We selectively analyzed five genes involved in the PI3K pathway, including PIK3CA, AKT, PIK3R1, PTEN, and TP53. The presence of mutation was correlated to overall survival, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression analyses. Results: Of the 47 patients, 53% were Caucasian and 47% were African American. 70% were early stage (TNM stage I, II) and 30% were late stage (TNM stage III, IV). 69% were never smokers, 31% were current or former smokers. ER, PR and HER2 were expressed in 84%, 79%, and 86% patients respectively. 66% had PI3K mutation, and 34% were PI3K wild type. There was no significant difference (log-rank test p = 0.28) in overall survival (OS) of patients with PI3K mutation versus those without, although the former group had longer survival numerically. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PI3K mutation was 0.53 (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Our project supports justification for a larger study to explore the role of aspirin in prevention, treatment and prognosis of breast cancer, and to validate biomarkers such as PI3K and related genes mediating the aspirin effect.

The role of aspirin in colorectal cancer chemoprevention.

Considerable interest has emerged over the last decade regarding the role of aspirin in prevention of colorectal cancer. This disease is one of the commonest cancers in the Western World, therefore, the existence of a simple "everyday" agent, which could have the ability to prevent the disease, represents an invaluable opportunity clinicians may be able to exploit. Evidence from case-control and cohort studies, and recent updates of randomised controlled trials have been very encouraging-indicating benefit from long term use of aspirin at low dose. Possible mechanisms of chemoprevention include inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway, or COX-independent mechanisms, for example, the PIK3CA pathway, or therapy-induced senescence of cancer cells. The most serious side effect of prolonged aspirin treatment is haemorrhage, especially from the GI tract. This is likely to be less of a problem with chemoprevention at lower doses. One also needs to consider the impact if aspirin resistance, an increasingly recognised clinical entity.

Utility of Aspirin Therapy in Patients With the Cardiometabolic Syndrome and Diabetes

Paralleling the rise in obesity, the cardiometabolic syndrome is a rapidly growing health problem in the United States. There is a 3-fold increase in the prevalence of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke due to the coagulation, hemodynamic, and metabolic abnormalities seen in these individuals. The use of aspirin for secondary prevention and, to a lesser degree, primary prevention of cardiovascular events is a well-established standard of care. However, in patients with diabetes or the cardiometabolic syndrome, the role of aspirin in prevention of cardiovascular events remains controversial. In this review, the authors examine the clinical trial data on the use of aspirin in diabetes and the cardiometabolic syndrome for cardiovascular protection. They also explore, in addition to aspirin's effects on platelet aggregation, some of the mechanisms by which aspirin may favorably alter the course of atherosclerosis, effects on endothelial function, and glycemia.

Aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

While there is good evidence for a protective effect of aspirin against occlusive vascular events in individuals with arterial disease, its role in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unclear. In this article we review the role of aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs in prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients, high risk medical patients requiring aspirin for other reasons, patients with myeloproliferative disorders, long distance travellers and patients receiving treatment with the IMiD class of drugs. Overall, data from the PEP study and Anti-Platelet Trialists' systematic review show that aspirin reduces the risk of VTE by around 25% in high risk surgical patients. Data from retrospective and before/after studies also suggest efficacy in reducing VTE in myeloma patients on IMiD drugs in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy. However, there has been no direct comparison with coumarins or heparin to indicate that aspirin is the optimal form of thromboprophylaxis. In patients who require aspirin because of high risk of arterial vascular occlusion (including patients with polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia), the additional small reduction in VTE risk is an added benefit with no additional risk associated. There is no evidence for a role of aspirin in prevention of travel-related thrombosis. At present there is no clear evidence that aspirin is the drug of choice for the prevention of VTE in any patient group.

Aspirin Use Among U.S. Adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

The role of aspirin in prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular complications among people with diabetes has been examined. A Healthy People 2010 objective calls for increasing the proportion of people with diabetes aged>or=40 years who take aspirin>or=15 times per month.Data from 2003 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to examine (1) the prevalence of aspirin intake, (2) aspirin use among those with CVD, (3) aspirin use among those with diabetes, (4) current status with respect to Healthy People objective 5-16, and (5) changes in aspirin intake from 1999.Daily or every-other-day aspirin use was reported by 36.2% of participants in 2003. Aspirin intake among those with CVD and diabetes was 82.8% and 62.6%, respectively. The Healthy People 2010 objective of increasing the proportion of adults with diabetes aged>or=40 years who take aspirin to 30% was achieved. The prevalence of aspirin intake was higher in 2003 compared to 1999 among all participants, those with CVD, and those with diabetes (relative increase of about 20%, 12%, and 36%, respectively). Most participants (74%) reported cardiovascular reasons for aspirin use. Among those without CVD or diabetes, the prevalence of aspirin intake increased with the increasing number of CVD risk factors.Regular aspirin use increased over a 4-year period. Greater use of inexpensive and easily accessible interventions to prevent cardiovascular events is encouraging. Increased efforts to continue preventive uses of available treatment and reduction in risk by modifying other risk factors will help lower future disease burden.