PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 天目山近自然毛竹林空间结构与胸径的关系 DOI: 10.5846/stxb201308252154 作者: 作者单位: 浙江农林大学环境与资源学院 临安,浙江农林大学环境与资源学院 临安,浙江农林大学环境与资源学院 临安,浙江农林大学环境与资源学院 临安,天目山国家级自然保护区管理局 临安 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(31170595); 国家"十二五"科技支撑计划(2012BAD22B0503); 浙江省重点科技创新团队(2010R50030); 教育部留学回国人员科研启动金项目(20101561); 国家林业局造林司委托项目(SFA2130218-2) The relationship between spatial structure and DBH of close-to-nature Phyllostachys edulis stands in Tianmu Mountain Author: Affiliation: School of Environment and Resource,Zhejiang A F University,School of Environment and Resource,Zhejiang A F University,School of Environment and Resource,Zhejiang A F University,School of Environment and Resource,Zhejiang A F University,Management Office,National Nature Reserve of Tianmu Mountain,Linan Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:以浙江省天目山国家级自然保护区内的近自然毛竹林为研究对象,设置1块100m×100m的固定标准地,采用相邻网格调查法划分为100个调查单元,通过全站仪精确定位毛竹基部的三维坐标(X, Y, Z),利用角尺度、大小比数和年龄隔离度3个林分空间结构指数,并按毛竹胸径大小划分为Ⅰ(DBH < 7cm) 、Ⅱ(7cm ≤ DBH<13cm)、Ⅲ(DBH ≥ 13cm)3个径级,分析近自然毛竹林空间结构与胸径的关系。结果表明:毛竹林直径结构呈右偏近似正态分布,与乔木同龄林直径结构较接近;Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ径级毛竹以及全林分的空间分布格局分别为聚集、随机、随机和随机,毛竹林角尺度随径阶的增加有减小的趋势,且服从幂函数关系,决定系数R2=0.7793,各径阶角尺度无显著性差异(P > 0.05);毛竹林整体处于中庸状态,胸径大小分化不明显,各径级毛竹优势度排序为Ⅲ > Ⅱ > Ⅰ,毛竹林大小比数随径阶的增加而减小,与胸径呈线性关系,决定系数R2=0.9233,各径阶大小比数差异极显著(P < 0.01);毛竹林的平均年龄隔离度为0.8178,属强度至极强度异龄,各径级毛竹年龄隔离程度大小排序为Ⅲ > Ⅱ > Ⅰ,毛竹林年龄隔离度随径阶的增大呈现逐渐递增的趋势,且服从幂函数关系,决定系数R2=0.6774,各径阶年龄隔离度差异极显著(P < 0.01)。 Abstract:Tree diameter structure is an important and basic role in forest structure. For the reason that the diameter at breast height (DBH) can be easily and accurately measured. Because it has a close relationship with variables such as stand density, tree age, tree height, canopy, biodiversity and so on, diameter structure is often used as a direct-response stand structure characteristic. DBH belongs to a set of non-spatial forest structure factors, and is frequently used to analyze the relationship between stand structure and growth, e.g. Recently, studies of forest spatial structure have expanded, partly due to the fact that the DBH is an important factor in explaining the growth of trees, and in many cases because the diameter structure has been used to analyze the relationship between spatial structure and DBH. Similarly, DBH is also an important factor in reflecting the growth of moso bamboo (Phyllpstachys edulis) forests. The DBH of moso bamboo can directly influence leaf area and root area volume, which affects the growth of moso bamboo. Others have performed a number of research studies on the relationship between DBH and other bamboo forest structure factors, such as bamboo height, age composition, canopy structure, and so on. However, these factors are generally measures of non-spatial structure. Recently, research suggests that a distance-dependent spatial index can accurately describe the moso bamboo stand structure, and therefore it is important to analyze and control the relationship between moso bamboo stand structure and function. Previous studies rarely reported the relationship between moso bamboo stand spatial structure and diameter. Therefore, three spatial structure parameters, uniform angle index, neighborhood comparison and age mingling degree were used to analyze the relationship between moso bamboo spatial structure and diameter, and thus provide a theoretical basis for sustainable moso bamboo forest management. The study was established in a close-to nature moso bamboo stand in Tianmu Mountain National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang province. The study design involved a fixed plot of 1hm2 (100 m×100 m), which was divided into 100 units by adjacent grid inventory. Each moso bamboo was located in terms of x-, y-, and z-coordinates using a Total Station. Three spatial structure parameters, including neighborhood comparison, uniform angle index, age mingling degree were evaluated. The DBH was recorded into one of three classes: Ⅰclass (DBH < 7 cm), Ⅱ class (7 cm ≤ DBH < 13 cm), Ⅲ class (DBH ≥ 13 cm). These classes were used to analyzed the relationship between spatial structure and DBH of the close-to-nature moso bamboo stand. The results showed that the frequency distribution of DBH had a right-skewed normal distribution, which is the similar to even-aged arbor stands. The spatial pattern of class Ⅱand class Ⅲ was of random distribution, similar to the distribution of the whole stand, but the pattern of class Ⅰshowed an aggregation distribution pattern. The uniform angle indexes decreased with increasing diameter classes, and results showed that the uniform index had a powerful relationship with DBH, with the determination coefficient between DBH and uniform index being 0.7793. The uniform angle of different diameter classes showed no obvious significant difference (P > 0.05). The neighborhood comparison showed that for stands in an intermediate status, the DBH differentiation was not significant. The neighborhood comparison values showed that the ranking of the dominant degree was: Ⅲ > Ⅱ > Ⅰ. And the neighborhood comparisons decreased with increasing diameter classes, as well as had a significantly linear correlation with DBH (the determination coefficient was 0.9233). The neighborhood comparison of different diameter classes showed significant differences (P < 0.01). The average age mingling of the stand was 0.8178, suggesting the age mingling intensity was intensive. The age mingling values showed the ranking of age segregation was: Ⅲ > Ⅱ > Ⅰ. And age mingling increased with increasing diameter classes, as well as had a strong relationship with DBH, where the determination coefficient was 0.6774. The age mingling of different diameter classes was also significanly different (P < 0.01). 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献