Robotic Surgery Procedures Research Articles

Narrative review in learning curve and pediatric robotic training program.

Studying learning curve (LC) for robotic procedures and developing an adequate training program are two fundamental steps to standardize robotic procedures. With this aim, we analyzed the literature to study the LCs of different robotic procedures and the availability of standardized training problems. The PubMed database was searched in the period from January 1995 to September 2022. Articles presenting LC and potential training programs in the pediatric population were chosen. Twenty papers were screened describing LC of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (n=12), fundoplication (n=4), cholecystectomy (n=2), choledochal cyst resection (n=1), nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy (n=1) and lingual tonsillectomy (n=1), with a total of 1,251 procedures. In 10 studies there was only one single surgeon; nine had more than one; one did not specify how many surgeons participated. Twelve papers were retrospective single-center, three multicentric retrospective, four prospective and one was compared a retrospective case series to a prospective cohort. Most of these studies focused on operative time as the primary outcome. It was analyzed as the only outcome in three articles, along with complications in 14, time to discharge in eight, blood loss in three and pain killer use in three. The selected studies analyzed LC impacting operative planning (n=20), training (n=10) and costs (n=2). There is still a long way to go to complete a standardized functional training for robotic surgery procedures in pediatric surgery. Moreover, the progressive reduction in costs expected in the years to come will play a key role in progressing the diffusion of this technology enabling the collection of data necessary to create a standardized pediatric surgery robotic training program.

The effect of dexamethasone on functional pain following Transoral Robotic Surgery: a randomized double blinded clinical trial

Background Pain is prevalent after most TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) procedures and may limit function i.e. swallowing. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding optimal pain treatment in TORS. Aims/objectives This clinical trial randomized patients to either a high-dose dexamethasone or low-dose dexamethasone treatment in addition to a multimodal basic analgesic protocol. The aim of the trial was to investigate the pain intensity during rest and swallowing using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after TORS lingual tonsillectomy. Secondary outcomes were acceptable food consistency, nausea, vomiting, opioid rescue usage, length of hospitalization, feeding tube placements, readmissions, blood glucose levels and postoperative complications. Methods The trial was conducted between August 2020 and October 2022. Eligible patients were patients scheduled for TORS-L treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome or as part of the diagnostic work-up of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary. Results Eighteen patients were and randomized 1:1. There were overall no significant differences between groups in the reported VAS scores during rest or swallowing (p ≥ .05). Overall, there were no differences in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion There were no differences in the pain intensity in the two treatment groups allocated to a basic multimodal analgesic package and either high-dose dexamethasone or low-dose dexamethasone treatment. The trial is the first RCT to include pain measurement during a procedure-relevant activity, thus creating a platform for future recovery studies.

Saline-aided ultrasound-guided transoral biopsy of retropharyngeal nodes in head and neck cancer: A feasibility study of five patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the novel technique of intra-cavitary saline-aided ultrasound (US) guided transoral biopsy or excision of retropharyngeal nodes. We followed the IDEAL 2a framework to develop this technique. Procedures were performed between July 2020 and July 2022 at a tertiary head and neck center. Five patients in total underwent an ultrasound-guided biopsy of a retropharyngeal node. They underwent seven procedures between them: three transoral robotic surgery (TORS) procedures, three fine needle aspirations (FNA) and/or core biopsy procedures, and one US assessment under general anesthetic. The six patients with histology taken (three TORS and three FNA/core biopsies) all had diagnostically adequate samples enabling appropriate treatment planning. There were no significant complications from the procedure. Saline-aided US-guided biopsy of a retropharyngeal node is a safe and useful tool enabling accurate tissue sampling and tumor excision and ongoing appropriate treatment planning.

Prevalence Of Robotic Surgery In Pakistan.

Dear Editor, Robot-assisted surgery is a medical procedure that utilizes specific innovation that improves the abilities of one’s surgical skills. It enables surgeons to perform complicated surgeries in difficult-to-reach areas via small incisions. The innovation comprises of 1-Surgical arms with tiny instruments with wrists at the tip, 2-Special camera that gives improved, amplified 3D perspectives on the region 3-Surgical Control Centre where the surgeon controls the instrument and the camera. (1) Experts who utilize robotic surgery find that it develops exactness, versatility, and control during the movement and permits them to see complex areas that are not visible through other techniques. Utilizing robotic surgery procedures, experts can do delicate and complex medical procedures that may be inconvenient with traditional procedures (2) Often, robotic surgery procedures make beyond belief prominent clinical therapies possible. The benefits of fewer obtrusive medical procedures include fewer bothers, less blood loss; speedier recovery; and fewer unmistakable scars. (2) Automated robotic surgery is now practice in Pakistan by the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation. Around the globe, robotic surgery has caught the attention of many physicians and is also used for other organ surgeryDespite mainstream thinking, it doesn't imply that robots are doing your medical procedure. All things being equal, a specialist controls robotic arms with outrageous accuracy. During robotic surgery, a specialist utilizes a PC to control the robotic arms that go through the method. Robotic surgery gives her unparalleled adaptability and accuracy during medical procedures. (3) In conclusion, Pakistan needs to care for an enormous pool of patients connected with the prostate, kidney, gall bladder, different tissues and organs. The current ratio of 0.473 physicians per 1,000 population in Pakistan is inadequate to maintain the nation's health. (4) Healthcare system frameworks all over the world have been changed over the most recent couple of years, bringing about a more prominent need and interest for surgical schooling outside operation theatres Lastly, the general well-being area of Pakistan ought to likewise make plans to import equipment,/ machines from organizations with the goal that it is made accessible in hospital across the country. Subsequently, this will help our careful division in its progression from a medical procedure to robotic assisted priesion medical procedure.

Robotic colorectal surgery: quality assessment of patient information available on the internet using webscraping

The primary goal of this study is to assess current patient information available on the internet concerning robotic colorectal surgery. Acquiring this information will aid in patients understanding of robotic colorectal surgery. Data was acquired through a web-scraping algorithm. The algorithm used two Python packages: Beautiful Soup and Selenium. The long-chain keywords incorporated into Google, Bing and Yahoo search engines were ‘Da Vinci Colon-Rectal Surgery’, ‘Colorectal Robotic Surgery’ and ‘Robotic Bowel Surgery’. 207 websites resulted, were sorted and evaluated according to the ensuring quality information for patients (EQIP) score. Of the 207 websites visited, 49 belonged to the subgroup of hospital websites (23.6%), 46 to medical centers (22.2%), 45 to practitioners (21.7%), 42 to health care systems (20,2%), 11 to news services (5.3%), 7 to web portals (3.3%), 5 to industry (2.4%), and 2 to patient groups (0.9%). Only 52 of the 207 websites received a high rating. The quality of available information on the internet concerning robotic colorectal surgery is low. The majority of information was inaccurate. Medical facilities involved in robotic colorectal surgery, robotic bowel surgery and related robotic procedures should develop websites with credible information to guide patient decisions.

Unique robotic vascular surgery procedures.

Based on their experience with robot-assisted vascular surgery, the authors present some unique types of procedures they have performed in this area. From November 2005 to February 2022, a total of 560 robotic vascular procedures were performed, of which 70 were orphan operations, corresponding to 12.5%. The most common was robotic decompression of the coeliac trunk (18 times) in Dunbar syndrome, followed by robotic repair of type II endoleak after stent graft implantation (15 times) and robotic repair of splenic artery aneurysm (11 times). Less common were isolated pelvic artery aneurysm surgery (8 times), aortic thromboenderectomy and abdominal aortic patch repair (8 times) and hybrid surgery (6 times). Completely unique are renal artery reconstruction (2 times), operation of internal mammary artery aneurysm (1 time) in a patient with Marfan syndrome and paracaval biopsy (1 time) in a cancer patient. In 3 cases (4.2%) the operation had to be converted to open surgery. Twice in the management of splenic artery aneurysm due to flat adhesions in the abdominal cavity and once in the endoleak operation, when due to the very fragile wall of the dilated and pulsating abdominal aortic aneurysm sac, we considered manipulation with robotic instruments to be highly risky. There was zero mortality in this cohort; one patient had to undergo laparoscopic diaphragm repair for diaphragmatic hernia at another institution after deliberation of the coeliac trunk and in one case open surgery was needed for persistent endoleak. The use of the robotic system can be beneficial also in less frequent procedures, offering the patients all the advantages of robotic surgery. However, the need of extensive experience in robotic surgery should be emphasized because these operations are rare and perfect anatomical knowledge of the area is necessary.

Expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS): What we see and what we say

BackgroundGiven the challenges of teaching in robotic operating rooms, we sought to investigate the language of perceptual expertise used by robotic surgeons, in an effort to improve current approaches to robotic training. MethodsExpert robotic surgeons reviewed 8 anonymous video clips portraying key portions of two robotic general surgery procedures and their comments were recorded and transcribed. Using content analysis, each transcript was double-coded and reconciled using a consensus developed codebook. ResultsSeventeen expert robotic surgeons participated and comments formed two primary themes: visual comprehension and surgical technique. Surgeons minimally used tactile language. Risk avoidance was a second-order theme dominating language used. ConclusionsExperts occasionally used tactile language and emphasized risk avoidance as they observed robotic surgery. Despite the need to communicate perceptual expertise to trainees in robotic surgery, tactile language was not exhibited by expert surgeons, revealing an important future area of focus for intraoperative teaching skills.

Enhancing robotic efficiency through the eyes of robotic surgeons: sub-analysis of the expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS) study.

Robotic technology affords surgeons many novel and useful features, but two stereotypes continue to prevail: robotic surgery is expensive and inefficient. To identify educational opportunities and improve operative efficiency, we analyzed expert commentary on videos of robotic surgery. Expert robotic surgeons, identified through high case volumes and contributions to the surgical literature, reviewed eight anonymous video clips portraying key portions of two robotic general surgery procedures. While watching, surgeons commented on what they saw on the screen. All interactions with participants were in person, recorded, transcribed, and subsequently analyzed. Using content analysis, researchers double-coded each transcript applying a consensus developed codebook. Seventeen surgeons participated. The average participant was male (82.4%), 47 (SD = 6.6) years old, had 13.2 (SD = 8.23) years of teaching experience, worked in urban academic hospitals (64.7%) and had performed 643 (SD = 467) robotic operations at the time of interviews. Emphasis on efficiency (or lack thereof) surfaced across three main themes: overall case progression, robotic capabilities, and instrumentation. Experts verbally rewarded purposeful and "ergonomically sound" movements while language reflecting impatience with repetitive and indecisive movements was attributed to presumed inexperience. Efficient robotic capabilities included enhanced visualization, additional robotic arms to improve exposure, and wristed instruments. Finally, experts discussed instrument selection with regards to energy modality, safety features, cost, and versatility. This study highlights three areas for improved efficiency: case progression, robotic capabilities, and instrumentation. Development of education materials within these themes could help surgical educators overcome one of robotic technology's persistent challenges.

Five Year Trends in the Utilization of Robotic Bariatric Surgery Procedures, United States 2015-2019.

Robotic approaches have been steadily replacing laparoscopic approaches in metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS); however, their superiority has not been rigorously evaluated. The main goal of the study was to evaluate the 5-year utilization trends of robotic MBS and to compare to laparoscopic outcomes. Retrospective analysis of 2015-2019 MBSAQIP data. Kruskal-Wallis test/Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact/chi-square were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to compare surgery outcomes. The use of robotic MBS increased from 6.2% in 2015 to 13.5% in 2019 (N= 775,258). Robotic MBS patients had significantly higher age, BMI, and likelihood of 12 diseases compared to laparoscopic patients. After adjustment, robotic MBS patients showed higher 30-day interventions and 30-day readmissions alongside longer surgery time (26-38 min). Robotic MBS shows higher intervention and readmission even after controlling for cofounding variables.

Abstract P3-21-02: Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy in the management of breast cancer and prophylactic surgeries with SP system

Abstract Background: Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) improves cosmetic outcomes over conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM). However, data on the feasibility and safety of the R-NSM are limited. The aim of this study was to present the results of early experience of R-NSM with SP system.Methods: Preliminary analysis of R-NSM using da Vinci SP system for breast cancer and prophylactic cases during the period October 2020 thru April 2021 from Asan Medical Center , Seoul, S Korea. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, type of surgery, method of breast reconstruction, complications and recurrence were analyzed to determine the performance and safety of R-NSM using da Vinci SP system Results: During the period October 2020 thru April 2021, a total of 41 robotic breast surgery procedures were performed in 39 female patients with breast cancer ( 35 invasive, 4 non-invasive ), and 2 patients who underwent surgery for prophylactic reasons. Five patients were bilateral and 29 were unilateral. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) was performed in all patients. Autologous reconstruction was performed in 16 cases, and implants were used in 23 cases. The mean age of all 41 patients was 47 years (range 31-58) and mean BMI was 23.1 (range 17.9-32.7). In two patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed before surgery. For 39 cancer cases the mean tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 0.0-8.0 cm). 14 cases had multiple tumors. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in all patients, and axillary dissection was performed in 6 cases. The pathologic stage was 12.8% DCIS, 51.3% stage I, 28.2% stage II, and 7.7 stage III. The mean operation time for R-NSM with IBR was 361 min (range 168- 788) and without IBR was 172 min ( range 80- 325). The mean hospital stay was 6.1 days (range 4-9). There were no conversions to open surgery. In three patients, nipples were removed as tumor positives from the retroareolar frozen section during surgery. The mean estimated blood loss was less than 10cc and 4 patients received transfusion but they pre-operative hemoglobin deficiency and required transfusion right after surgery. There were no procedure related reoperation and readmission and no cases of mortality during 60 day follow up period.. There were no major perioperative complications. There were 4 patient who experienced partial nipple necrosis and did not require medical intervention and were resolved. The conventional NSM method had low cosmetic satisfaction due to the enlarged skin incision on the front of the breast. When the incision is made smaller, the surgical field of view is narrow and it is difficult to perform precise surgery due to difficulty in the surgical procedure. Conclusion: From our preliminary experience, R-NSM alone or combined with IBR is a safe procedure, with clinical outcomes results, and is promising new technology for breast cancer patients indicated for mastectomy. Citation Format: Sae Byul Lee, Hyun Ho Han, Jisun Kim, BeomSeok Ko. Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy in the management of breast cancer and prophylactic surgeries with SP system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-21-02.

Using Flow Disruptions to Examine System Safety in Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Crossover Design.

BackgroundThe integration of high technology into health care systems is intended to provide new treatment options and improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of care. Robotic-assisted surgery is an example of high technology integration in health care, which has become ubiquitous in many surgical disciplines.ObjectiveThis study aims to understand and measure current robotic-assisted surgery processes in a systematic, quantitative, and replicable manner to identify latent systemic threats and opportunities for improvement based on our observations and to implement and evaluate interventions. This 5-year study will follow a human factors engineering approach to improve the safety and efficiency of robotic-assisted surgery across 4 US hospitals.MethodsThe study uses a stepped wedge crossover design with 3 interventions, introduced in different sequences at each of the hospitals over four 8-month phases. Robotic-assisted surgery procedures will be observed in the following specialties: urogynecology, gynecology, urology, bariatrics, general, and colorectal. We will use the data collected from observations, surveys, and interviews to inform interventions focused on teamwork, task design, and workplace design. We intend to evaluate attitudes toward each intervention, safety culture, subjective workload for each case, effectiveness of each intervention (including through direct observation of a sample of surgeries in each observational phase), operating room duration, length of stay, and patient safety incident reports. Analytic methods will include statistical data analysis, point process analysis, and thematic content analysis.ResultsThe study was funded in September 2018 and approved by the institutional review board of each institution in May and June of 2019 (CSMC and MDRH: Pro00056245; VCMC: STUDY 270; MUSC: Pro00088741). After refining the 3 interventions in phase 1, data collection for phase 2 (baseline data) began in November 2019 and was scheduled to continue through June 2020. However, data collection was suspended in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected a total of 65 observations across the 4 sites before the pandemic. Data collection for phase 2 was resumed in October 2020 at 2 of the 4 sites.ConclusionsThis will be the largest direct observational study of surgery ever conducted with data collected on 680 robotic surgery procedures at 4 different institutions. The proposed interventions will be evaluated using individual-level (workload and attitude), process-level (perioperative duration and flow disruption), and organizational-level (safety culture and complications) measures. An implementation science framework is also used to investigate the causes of success or failure of each intervention at each site and understand the potential spread of the interventions.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/25284

Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade.

Despite reports of increasing adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery worldwide, data regarding its uptake in Australasia are lacking. This study examines the trends of robotic colorectal surgery in Australia during the last 10 years. Data from patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci robotic platform between 2010 and 2019 were obtained. Overall, numbers of specific colorectal procedures across Australia were obtained from the Medicare Benefit Schedule data over the same period. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the statistical trends of overall and specific robotic colorectal procedures over time. A total of 6110 robotic general surgery procedures were performed across Australia during the study period. Of these, 3522 (57.6%) were robotic colorectal procedures. An increasing trend of overall robotic colorectal procedures was seen over 10 years (Pearson's coefficient of 0.875; P= 0.001). While this applied to both the public and private sectors, 90.7% of the procedures were undertaken in the private sector. Restorative rectal resections, rectopexies, and right hemicolectomies accounted for 82.6% of the robotic colorectal procedures performed during this period with an increasing trend seen over time for each intervention. Moreover, a robotic approach was utilized in 12.5%, 41.0% and 9.0% of all restorative rectal resections, rectopexies and right hemicolectomies undertaken in Australia during 2019, respectively. Robotic colorectal surgery has increased dramatically in Australia over the last 10 years, especially in the private sector. Penetration of robotic colorectal surgery in the public healthcare system will require focussed cost-benefit evaluations and governmental investment.

Do existing real-world data sources generate suitable evidence for the HTA of medical devices in Europe? Mapping and critical appraisal.

Technological and computational advancements offer new tools for the collection and analysis of real-world data (RWD). Considering the substantial effort and resources devoted to collecting RWD, a greater return would be achieved if real-world evidence (RWE) was effectively used to support Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and decision making on medical technologies. A useful question is: To what extent are RWD suitable for generating RWE? We mapped existing RWD sources in Europe for three case studies: hip and knee arthroplasty, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and mitral valve repair (TMVR), and robotic surgery procedures. We provided a comprehensive assessment of their content and appropriateness for conducting the HTA of medical devices. The identification of RWD sources was performed combining a systematic search on PubMed with gray literature scoping, covering fifteen European countries. We identified seventy-one RWD sources on arthroplasties; ninety-five on TAVI and TMVR; and seventy-seven on robotic procedures. The number, content, and integrity of the sources varied dramatically across countries. Most sources included at least one health outcome (97.5%), with mortality and rehospitalization/reoperation the most common; 80% of sources included resource outcomes, with length of stay the most common, and comparators were available in almost 70% of sources. RWD sources bear the potential for the HTA of medical devices. The main challenges are data accessibility, a lack of standardization of health and economic outcomes, and inadequate comparators. These findings are crucial to enabling the incorporation of RWD into decision making and represent a readily available tool for getting acquainted with existing information sources.

Trends in robotic surgery utilization across tertiary children's hospitals in the United States.

A growing number of tertiary children's hospitals are utilizing robotic surgical technology. We sought to characterize national trends in pediatric surgical robotic case utilization and related drivers. Pediatric urology and pediatric surgery (abdominal and thoracic) procedures, performed from January 2010 to December 2019 across 19 U.S. tertiary care children's hospitals, were identified using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). Trends in robot utilization were evaluated by surgical subspecialty, procedure type, and number of individual operating surgeons. Increases were noted in the overall numbers of pediatric surgery (1.3% per quarter, p = 0.005) and urology robotic procedures (2.0% per quarter, p < 0.001), as well as the numbers of pediatric surgeons (7.5% per year, p < 0.001) and pediatric urologists (7.8% per year, p < 0.001) operating robotically. Biliary system and spleen surgery were the most common robotic pediatric surgery procedures (45.5%) and had stable utilization over time (- 0.8% per quarter, 95% CI - 2.3-0.8). Robotic foregut surgery showed the most rapid growth in utilization (2.1% per quarter, 95% CI 0.7-3.6, p = 0.004) in pediatric surgery, while mediastinal/thoracic surgery demonstrated a decrease in utilization (- 4.6%, 95% CI - 7.9-1.2, p = 0.008). Renal pelvis/ureter surgery was the most common robotic urologic procedure (55.8%) and also demonstrated the fastest growth utilization (2.2% per quarter, 95% CI 1.5-2.9, p < 0.001) in urology. Utilization of robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric surgery and pediatric urology has increased both in case volume and the number of operating surgeons, with foregut and renal pelvis/ureter surgery responsible for the areas of greatest growth.

Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures

Abstract In robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structures beneath the tissue, such as vessels. Only visual clues are available to the surgeon to control the force applied to the tissue by the instruments, which poses a risk for iatrogenic injuries. Additional information on haptic interactions of the employed instruments and the treated tissue that is provided to the surgeon during robotic surgery could compensate for this deficit. Acoustic emissions (AE) from the instrument/tissue interactions, transmitted by the instrument are a potential source of this information. AE can be recorded by audio sensors that do not have to be integrated into the instruments, but that can be modularly attached to the outside of the instruments shaft or enclosure. The location of the sensor on a robotic system is essential for the applicability of the concept in real situations. While the signal strength of the acoustic emissions decreases with distance from the point of interaction, an installation close to the patient would require sterilization measures. The aim of this work is to investigate whether it is feasible to install the audio sensor in non-sterile areas far away from the patient and still be able to receive useful AE signals. To determine whether signals can be recorded at different potential mounting locations, instrument/tissue interactions with different textures were simulated in an experimental setup. The results showed that meaningful and valuable AE can be recorded in the non-sterile area of a robotic surgical system despite the expected signal losses.

An extended algorithm for autonomous grasping of soft tissues during robotic surgery.

Autonomous grasping of soft tissues can facilitate the robotic surgery procedures. The previous attempts for implementing auto-grasping have been based on a simplistic representation of the actual surgery maneuvers. A generalized three-zone grasp model was introduced to consider the effect of the pull force angulation on the grasp mode, that is, damage, slip, or safe grasp. Also, an extended auto-grasping algorithm was proposed in which the trigger force is automatically controlled against the pull force magnitude and direction, to achieve a safe and secure grasp. The autonomous grasping experiments against a varying pull force in a phantom study indicated a good agreement between the desired and actual pinch and trigger forces (root mean square errors lower than 0.168 N and 0.280 N, respectively) and no sign of tissue tear or slippage. The proposed auto-grasping algorithm can help manipulating the soft tissues safely and effectively during robotic surgery procedures.

Evaluation of Surgical Skills during Robotic Surgery by Deep Learning-Based Multiple Surgical Instrument Tracking in Training and Actual Operations.

As the number of robotic surgery procedures has increased, so has the importance of evaluating surgical skills in these techniques. It is difficult, however, to automatically and quantitatively evaluate surgical skills during robotic surgery, as these skills are primarily associated with the movement of surgical instruments. This study proposes a deep learning-based surgical instrument tracking algorithm to evaluate surgeons’ skills in performing procedures by robotic surgery. This method overcame two main drawbacks: occlusion and maintenance of the identity of the surgical instruments. In addition, surgical skill prediction models were developed using motion metrics calculated from the motion of the instruments. The tracking method was applied to 54 video segments and evaluated by root mean squared error (RMSE), area under the curve (AUC), and Pearson correlation analysis. The RMSE was 3.52 mm, the AUC of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm were 0.7, 0.78, and 0.86, respectively, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were 0.9 on the x-axis and 0.87 on the y-axis. The surgical skill prediction models showed an accuracy of 83% with Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS). The proposed method was able to track instruments during robotic surgery, suggesting that the current method of surgical skill assessment by surgeons can be replaced by the proposed automatic and quantitative evaluation method.

Mortality for Robotic- vs Video-Assisted Lobectomy-Treated Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BackgroundTo address the US Food and Drug Administration’s recent safety concern on robotic surgery procedures, we compared short- and long-term mortality for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated by robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy (RATS-L) vs video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy (VATS-L).MethodsFrom the National Cancer Database, we identified 18 908 stage I NSCLC patients who underwent RATS-L or VATS-L as the primary operation from 2010 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for short- and long-term mortality using unmatched and propensity score–matched analyses. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsPatients treated by RATS-L had higher 90-day mortality than those with VATS-L (6.6% vs 3.8%, P = .03) if conversion to open thoracotomy occurred. After excluding first-year observation, multiple regression analyses showed RATS-L was associated with increased long-term mortality, compared with VATS-L, in cases with tumor size 20 mm or less: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.55), HR = 1.36 (95% CI = 1.17 to 1.58), and HR = 1.33 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.61) for unmatched, N:1 matched, and 1:1 matched analyses, respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis. Among patients without conversion to an open thoracotomy, the respective hazard ratios were 1.19 (95% CI = 1.10 to 1.29), 1.19 (95% CI = 1.10 to 1.29), and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.29). Similar associations were observed when follow-up time started 18 or 24 months postsurgery. No statistically significant mortality difference was found for patients with tumor size of greater than 20 mm. These associations were not related to case volume of VATS-L or RATS-L performed at treatment institutes.ConclusionsPatients with small (≤20 mm) stage I NSCLC treated with RATS-L had statistically significantly higher long-term mortality risk than VATS-L after 1 year postsurgery.

Trans-subxiphoid robotic surgery for anterior mediastinal disease: an initial case series.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic trans-subxiphoid surgery is an ideal technique for removing anterior mediastinal lesions. The diffusion of this method, however, has been limited by the complexity of surgical maneuvers to be performed in the narrow retrosternal space. Robotic surgery holds promise to overcome the technical limitations of the thoracoscopic trans-subxiphoid approach. Here, we describe a case series of patients who had undergone trans-subxiphoid robotic surgery-with a special focus on short-term outcomes. Between January 2018 and January 2019, a total of 20 patients underwent trans-subxiphoid robotic surgery for maximal thymectomy or removal of anterior mediastinal masses. A 3-cm longitudinal incision was performed below the xiphoid process, through which carbon dioxide was insufflated and a camera port was inserted. Subsequently, the lower sections of the mediastinal pleura were detached bilaterally-followed by the creation of two bilateral 1-cm skin incisions on the anterior axillary line in the sixth intercostal space for the insertion of robotic arms. Upon completion of port positioning, the surgical robot was docked. All robotic surgery procedures were successfully completed. Neither conversion to open surgery nor the creation of additional ports was required. The median operating time and console time were 118 min [interquartile range (IQR): 84-147 min] and 92.5 min (IQR: 78.5-133.5 min), respectively. Drainage tube positioning was not required in 11 (55%) patients. There were no operative deaths, and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was 2.5 days (IQR: 2-3 days). One patient had postoperative chylothorax and received conservative treatment. The results of this case series provide initial support to the clinical feasibility, safety, and short-term positive outcomes of trans-subxiphoid robot-assisted surgery for anterior mediastinal disease.

Microsurgical robotic suturing of sural nerve graft for sympathetic nerve reconstruction: a technical feasibility study.

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) may provide a permanent surgical cure for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Unfortunately, some patients can experience intensive post-operative compensatory sweating (CS) that ultimately impairs quality of life. Sympathetic nerve reconstruction (SNR) may be used to counteract severe post-operative CS through the restoration of sympathetic pathways. In this case series, we describe the technical feasibility of a robot-assisted micro-peripheral nerve reconstruction method for achieving SNR in patients with post-operative CS. Between January 2017 and May 2019, seven cases with severe post-operative CS underwent robot-assisted SNR using a sural nerve graft. We report the pre-operative assessment, the surgical technique, and the clinical outcomes of the study patients. The study sample consisted of five men and two women (median age: 41 years). Primary hyperhidrosis affected the face in one case and the palms in six patients. The median time between ETS and SNR was 20 years. All robotic surgery procedures were successfully accomplished, and neither conversion to open surgery nor the creation of additional ports were required. Sural nerve grafts (median length: 8 cm) were used in all cases, and the median operating time was 10.5 h. There was no operative mortality, with the median length of post-operative hospital stay being 4 days. One patient developed a post-operative pneumothorax-which was treated conservatively. Our case series demonstrates the safety and clinical feasibility of microsurgical robot-assisted sural nerve grafting for achieving SNR in patients with post-operative CS.