Robotic Surgery Research Articles

Current status analysis of the prevalence and regional disparities of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Japan using diagnosis procedure combination data

The introduction of the “da Vinci S HD Surgical System” marked a significant shift towards robotic surgeries in Japan. However, initial high costs and lack of efficacy data posed barriers to its widespread adoption. By 2023, more than 570 da Vinci units were operational in Japan, highlighting the growing acceptance of robotic surgery despite these challenges. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and regional disparities in the adoption of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) across Japan using diagnosis procedure combination data. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 2857 urban and 4184 regional hospitals across 47 prefectures in Japan. The study focused on the number of RALP procedures, da Vinci systems, and certified urological surgery proctors. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify significant factors influencing RALP adoption. Urban areas demonstrated a higher prevalence of RALP procedures and more da Vinci systems compared to regional areas, with urban hospitals performing an average of 937 RALP procedures compared to 195.5 in regional hospitals. The number of certified urological surgeons also showed significant urban-regional disparities, contributing to the overall imbalance. Our findings highlight substantial regional disparities in access to robot-assisted surgery in Japan, with urban areas benefiting from better access to advanced medical technologies and specialist training. Addressing these disparities will require targeted policies to improve the dissemination of robotic surgery systems and enhance training opportunities in regional cities.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: This systematic review, using pairwise and network meta-analyses, aimed to compare the intraoperative, short-term, and long-term postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) for the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Methods: Studies reporting on the effects of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery on pNETs published before November 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL were analyzed. Results: Thirty-two studies with 5379 patients were included in this review, encompassing 2251 patients undergoing MIS (1334 laparoscopic, 508 robotic, and 409 unspecified MIS) and 3128 patients undergoing OS for pNETs management. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that the MIS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay ((a low certainty of evidence), MD of −4.87 (−6.19 to −3.56)); less intraoperative blood loss ((a low certainty of evidence), MD of −108.47 (−177.47 to −39.47)); and decreased tumor recurrence ((a high certainty of evidence), RR of 0.46, 95% CI (0.33 to 0.63)). Subgroup analysis indicated a higher R0 resection rate and prolonged operative time for laparoscopic surgery than for OS. The network meta-analysis ranked the robotic approach as superior in terms of the length of hospital stay, followed by the laparoscopic and OS arms. Furthermore, it favored both MIS approaches over OS in terms of the R0 resection rate. No significant differences were found in severe postoperative complications, postoperative fistula formation, mortality, readmission, reoperation, or conversion rates. Conclusions: This review supports the safety of MIS for the treatment of pNETs. However, the varying certainty of evidence emphasizes the need for higher-quality studies.

Ventral hernia repair with permanent mesh for non-Hispanic black versus white patients: access and post-operative outcomes in the era of robotic surgery.

Robotic ventral hernia surgery may provide better patient outcomes. Whether it is provided equitably based on race remains unknown. We examined whether patients from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative who were Black had equitable access to robotic surgery for ventral hernia repair with permanent mesh compared to white counterparts from 2013 to 2023. We performed propensity-score matching to address confounding and then chi-squared testing to examine access to robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmissions, complications, and death and 1- and 2-year hernia recurrence and quality of life measured by HerQLes Summary and PROMIS Pain T-Scores analyzed with chi-squared, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon testing. 2397 patients identified as Black, and 21,900 identified as white. Our propensity-score matched cohort included 2374 Black patients and 7122 white. Black and white groups had the same rates of laparoscopy (15% vs 15%). Patients who identified as Black were more likely to undergo robotic surgery (36% vs 32%). Open approach was 49% for Black and 53% for white (p = 0.005). For 30-day complications, we found Black patients were more likely to experience reoperation (2% vs 1%, p = 0.005) and less likely surgical site infection (1% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Hernia recurrence scores and perceived abdominal health based on HerQLes were not statistically significantly different. At 2years, absolute reported T-Scores were higher for Black patients (median 40 (IQR 31-49) vs 36 (31-46), p = 0.031). This is the first large-scale study examining access to robotic surgery, complications, and quality of life measures. We found patients who identified as Black were more likely than white counterparts to undergo robotic surgery, but they were more likely to require reoperation and had higher pain scores. Our data suggest equitable access still may not translate to equitable patient outcomes.

Robotic Surgery: Transforming Healthcare Landscape

Robotic surgery has come to light as an innovative advance in medicine that has drastically changed the face of healthcare. Patients can benefit from this technology's unparalleled precision, control, and minimally invasive choices to its integration of sophisticated robotics, artificial intelligence, and accurate surgical methods. With the use of robotic devices, surgeons may now conduct difficult procedures with increased accuracy, less trauma, and quicker recovery times. Shorter hospital stays and reduced complication rates are the results of this better patient outcome. The article examines the development of robotic surgery, its present uses in a range of medical specialties, and its effects on patient care and the larger healthcare system. It also addresses the difficulties and prospects for robotic surgery in the future, particularly how it might be integrated with cutting-edge innovations like telemedicine and machine learning, which have the potential to completely transform the surgical field. This analysis highlights how robotic surgery can change healthcare delivery and improve patient outcomes. It also shows how robotic surgery has the potential to become a new norm in modern medicine.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with lymphadenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is increasingly used for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.ObjectiveTo estimate the effect and cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an SLN algorithm for surgical staging in...

Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study

BackgroundNephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The role of minimally invasive surgery in treating locally advanced UTUC remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for managing locally advanced UTUC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with locally advanced UTUC from multiple institutions throughout Taiwan. Perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes, such as cancer-specific survival, overall survival, disease-free survival and bladder-free survival, were compared between the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups.ResultsThe minimally invasive group had better overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The 2-year CSS rates of the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups were 71%, 83%, and 77% respectively (p < 0.001). The robotic group had similar outcomes to the laparoscopic group. (p = 0.061, 0.825, 0.341 for OS, CSS, DFS respectively.) More lymph node dissections were performed and more lymph nodes were harvested in the robotic group (p = 0.009).ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for locally advanced UTUC resulted in oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to those of open surgery.

Preoperative Factors for Success of Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction for Distal Ureteral Strictures.

Introduction: To investigate preoperative predictors of surgical success for patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) for management of distal ureteral strictures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery database to identify all consecutive patients undergoing RUR for surgical repair of distal ureteral strictures between 04/2012 and 12/2022. Procedures included refluxing reimplant (58.5%), side to side reimplant (18.0%), ureteroureterostomy (12.7%), non-refluxing reimplant (6.3%), buccal mucosa ureteroplasty (2.8%), and appendiceal bypass ureteroplasty (1.7%). Patients were grouped according to whether they were surgically successful. Preoperative variables between both groups were compared using chi-square tests. All variables with associations of p < 0.2 underwent a binary logistic regression analysis to determine predictive variables of success for RUR (p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant). Results: Overall, 284 patients met inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis showed obesity (p = 0.03), smoking history (p = 0.10), abdominopelvic radiation history (p = 0.14), immunocompromised state (p = 0.12), and ureteral rest (p = 0.01) were notable preoperative factors (p < 0.2). Binary logistic regression analysis further revealed the odds of surgical success in patients with obesity was 0.32 times (CI: 0.12-0.83, p = 0.02) the odds of success for patients without obesity. The odds of surgical success in patients who underwent preoperative ureteral rest was 4.2 times (CI: 1.51-11.77, p < 0.01) the odds of success for patients who did not undergo preoperative ureteral rest. Conclusion: Preoperative factors including obesity and ureteral rest may affect surgical success of RUR for management of distal ureteral strictures.

Early Hospital Discharge on Day Two Post-Robotic Lobectomy with Telehealth Home Monitoring.

Background: Despite the implementation of enhanced recovery programs, the reported average postoperative length of stay after robotic lobectomy remains as 4 days. In this prospective study, we present the outcomes of early discharge (on day 2) with telehealth home monitoring device after robotic lobectomy for lung cancer in selected patients. Methods: All patients with a caregiver were discharged on postoperative day 2 (POD 2) with a telemonitoring device provided they met the specific discharge criteria. Inclusion criteria: <75 years old, stage I-II NSCLC, with caregiver, ECOG 0-2, scheduled for lobectomy, logistic proximity to hospital (<60 km); intra-postoperative exclusion criteria: conversion to open surgery, early complications needing hospital monitoring or redo-operation, difficult pain management, <92 HbO2% saturation on room air or need for O2 supplementation, altered vital or laboratory parameters. Teleconsultations were scheduled as follows: the first one in afternoon of POD2, two on POD3, then once a day until chest tube removal. After discharge, patients recorded their vital signs at least four times a day using the device, which allowed two surgeons to monitor them via a mobile application. In the event of sudden changes in vital signs or the occurrence of adverse events, patients had access to a direct phone line and a dedicated re-hospitalization pathway. The primary outcome was safety, assessed by the occurrence of post-discharge complications or readmissions, as well as feasibility. Secondary outcomes: comparison of safety profile with a matched control group in which the standard of care and the evaluation of resource optimization were maintained and economic evaluation. Results: Between July 2022 and February 2024, 48 patients were enrolled in the present study. Six patients (12.5%) dropped out due to unsatisfied discharge criteria on POD2. Exclusion causes were: significant air leaks (n:2) requiring monitoring and the use of suction device, uncontrolled pain (n:2), atrial fibrillation, and occurrence of cerebral ischemia (n:1 each). The adherence rate to vital signs monitoring by patients was 100%. A mean number of four measurements per day was performed by each patient. During telehealth home monitoring, a total of 71/2163 (1.4%) vital sign measurements violated the established acceptable threshold in 22 (52%) patients. All critical violations were managed at home. During the surveillance period (defined as the time from POD 2 to the day of chest tube removal), a persistent air leak was recorded in one patient requiring readmission to the hospital (on POD 13) and re-intervention with placement of a second thoracic drainage due to unsatisfactory lung expansion. No other postoperative complication occurred nor was there any readmission needed. Compared to the control group, the discharge gain was 2.5 days, with an economic benefit of 528 €/day (55.440 € on the total enrolled population). Conclusions: Our results confirm that the adoption of telehealth home monitoring is feasible and allows a safe discharge on postoperative day two after robotic surgery for stage I-II NSCLC in selected patients. A potential economic benefit (141 days of hospitalizations avoided) for the healthcare system could result from the adoption of this protocol.

Shape sensing endoscope fiber

Minimally invasive and robotic surgeries are growing areas that benefit patients through reduced recovery time. Medical fiber optics play an important role in these procedures by enabling instrument navigation, imaging, sensing, power delivery, and diagnostics in a small form factor. One route to further miniaturization is to combine these functions, or a subset of these functions, into a single strand of optical fiber. In this work, we present a fiber and fan-in device that enables shape sensing, imaging, power delivery, and potentially additional sensing capabilities, such as temperature and/or pressure, in the same waveguide. The refractive index profile of the multimode waveguide in our fiber is similar to step index fibers used in laser delivery and is suitable for imaging applications; however, it also contains seven single mode cores twisted in a helix and with quasi-continuous Bragg gratings along their entire length, such as are used in fiber shape sensing. We first calibrate the transmission matrix of the multimode waveguide to enable the formation of a focused spot at the distal end of the fiber with a spatial light modulator. A second calibration allows us to reconstruct the shape of the fiber using optical frequency domain reflectometry in the twisted shape sensing cores. We show that these multiple functions can be performed simultaneously with our device and that changes in the curvature of the fiber correlate with the quality of the distal spot produced through the fiber, which is an important step towards maintaining the imaging calibration as the fiber is manipulated.

Morocco, a New Era of Robotic Surgery

Robotic surgery has been widely adopted over the past two decades, because it offers significant advantages such as minimally invasive access, precision, ergonomic design, and enhanced safety [...]

Exploring the Potential of Robotic Single-Port Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer: Initial Insights and Future Prospects.

Robotic surgery has demonstrated outcomes comparable or superior to open and laparoscopic surgeries for extended cholecystectomy.1-8 Despite its advantages, the minimally invasive robotic single-port (SP) system remains underutilized in complex hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery due to instrument limitations and retraction issues.9,10 This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the da Vinci SP system in gallbladder cancer surgery. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of OOO University Hospital (IRB no. DAUH IRB-24-081) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the study's retrospective design. A 62-year-old woman with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer was referred for surgery. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans showed no evidence of metastasis (T2N0). Therefore, a robotic SP extended cholecystectomy was planned. Figure 1 shows a 30-mm SP port and a 1-mm assistant port inserted for the procedure. Due to the absence of an energy device for the liver wedge resection, Maryland bipolar forceps were used, mimicking the Kelly clamp crushing technique. A monopolar cautery hook was used for lymph node resection of stations 7, 8, 12, and 13 (Fig. 2). Fig. 1 Port placement for robotic extended cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Xi system Fig. 2 Demonstration of full lymph node dissection RESULTS: The total duration of the operation was 226 min, with an estimated blood loss of 200 ml. The CT scan on day 5 showed no abnormalities, and the patient was discharged routinely on day 7 (Fig. 3). The pathologic examination confirmed adenocarcinoma (T2a) with clear resection, and all six lymph nodes tested negative for malignancy. Fig. 3 The wound 2 weeks after surgery CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the adequacy of robotic surgeries and emphasizes the potential of the da Vinci SP system in hepatobiliary surgery. Despite current challenges related to instrument limitations, the authors are confident that the SP system will evolve into a crucial asset for hepatobiliary surgical practices in the foreseeable future.

Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction following minimally invasive colorectal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and short-term outcomes

AimPostoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) is a common complication following colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of POGD after minimally invasive surgery and to assess the relationship between robotic surgery, POGD, and their outcomes.MethodPatients who had undergone minimally invasive colorectal surgery at our institution between July 2018 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. POGD was diagnosed based on the presence of two or more intestinal symptoms within 72 h or more after surgery. Risk factors were identified through regression analyses, and the impact of POGD on outcomes was assessed using linear regression.The association between those factors was assessed using subgroup analysis and hierarchical regression.ResultsA total of 226 patients were included in the analysis, including 33 with POGD. POGD occurred in 14.6% of patients, with a lower incidence in robotic surgery (7.3%) than in laparoscopic surgery (19.8%). Multivariate analysis indicated that robotic surgery had a protective effect, while blood loss exceeding 50 ml was an independent risk factor for POGD. POGD was also correlated with longer length of stays and higher costs. The association between POGD, length of stay, and cost varied depending on the surgical platform. Robotic surgery exacerbated the effect of POGD on short-term outcomes, which aligned with the observed significant interaction effect.ConclusionPOGD remains a prevalent postoperative disease. Preventive strategies, including meticulous hemostasis techniques and robotic surgery, should be prioritized by healthcare professionals to reduce POGD risk, improve short-term outcomes, and preserve healthcare resources.

Evaluating robotic assistance on the learning curve and efficiency of mandibular angle ostectomy: an animal model study.

This study evaluated the efficacy and learning curve of a maxillofacial surgical robotic system (MSRS) guided by electromagnetic navigation for mandibular angle ostectomy (MAO), compared to traditional surgical methods. The study utilized a controlled experiment involving thirty rabbits, paired divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group underwent MAO using the MSRS, while the control group was treated with conventional surgical techniques. The surgeons performing the procedures were inexperienced in robotic surgery and MAO to assess the learning curve and the impact of robotic assistance. Key parameters measured included the accuracy of ostectomy, setup time, and ostectomy efficiency, with data analyzed through a paired-t test to compare the performance between the two groups. The study indicated a significant reduction in ostectomy time for the experimental group, with improved accuracy and efficiency in ostectomy. The study found that robotic assistance could decrease the risk of complications and enhance surgical outcomes. It also highlighted the presence of an initial learning curve when adopting new robotic technologies, which could be mitigated through adequate training and simulation practices. Using MSRS for MAO could lead to faster early learning curves and increased ostectomy efficiency compared to traditional surgical methods. It demonstrated the potential benefits of integrating robotic systems into craniofacial surgery, suggesting a promising direction for future surgical practices.

Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is there a benefit?

Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a therapeutic option for the management of malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis and of peritoneal origin. Robotic surgery shows promise as a minimally invasive approach for select patients. We aimed to evaluate the differences in outcomes between robotic versus open CRS/HIPEC and hypothesized less morbidity and faster recovery in the robotic approach group. We conducted a retrospective cohort study from our HIPEC database including all tumor origins. We included patients aged 18-89years who underwent CRS/HIPEC for curative intent at a single institution between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. Patients were stratified by open versus robotic-assisted surgery. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher Exact tests were used to compare differences in patient characteristics and outcomes. A total of 111 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for curative intent, with 95 (85.6%) cases performed open and 16 (14.4%) robotically. The groups were demographically similar, except patients undergoing robotic CRS/HIPEC had a significantly higher median income ($83,845 vs. $70,519, p < 0.001). Rate of comorbidities and cancer type, including appendiceal, colorectal, and ovarian, were the same. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index and completion of cytoreduction score were similar between groups. Robotic approach was associated with statistically significant lower estimated blood loss (113 vs. 400mL, p < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (6.3% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.036). Total complications, readmission rates, and 30-day mortality were similar among groups, but the robotic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (5.5 vs. 9 d., p < 0.001). Robotic CRS/HIPEC holds promise to decrease intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusions, and hospital stay while providing similar immediate postoperative outcomes in select patients. These results should be validated in the setting of a prospective trial and effects on long-term oncologic outcomes should be investigated.

Robotic Hepatic Parenchymal Transection Techniques: A Choice Between Imperfect Tools.

Regardless of approach, safe and effective parenchymal transection is critical for hepatectomies.1 In robotic surgery, this can be accomplished via several methods. The authors highlight some of the more common tools and techniques used to transect the liver. The Vessel Sealer Extend is a console-controlled device with bipolar energy, mechanical cutting, full-wristed articulation, and grasping abilities that allow it to replicate the clamp-crush technique while sealing small vessels. However, the jaw is bulky and suboptimal for firm/fibrotic livers.2,3 The Synchroseal shares many features of the Vessel Sealer Extend but has thinner jaws, making it easier to advance in firm livers, and lacks a cutting blade, relying instead on a cut electrode to divide tissue. Proteinaceous char can accumulate on the jaws, impairing its effectiveness, but intermittent irrigation can mitigate this. The robotic Harmonic Scalpel coagulates, transects, and precisely dissects parenchyma. However, it is limited in length and lacks wristed articulation.4,5 Ultrasonic surgical aspiratory devices allow for precise, atraumatic dissection around vasculobiliary structures, but no robotic-integrated versions currently exist. Therefore, application of this technology in robotic surgery requires an experienced bedside assistant operating the laparoscopic version while the console surgeon uses robotic instruments to coagulate, clip, and divide larger structures.6-9 The dual bipolar technique is useful for spot coagulation and dissection but has limited transection ability.10 It often is an adjunct to other transection techniques.11-13 Several methods exist for robotic parenchymal transection, and although none are perfect, they can be combined for safe and effective transection.

Retrospective Assessment of Factors Affecting Carboxyhemoglobin Levels in Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery

Retrospective Assessment of Factors Affecting Carboxyhemoglobin Levels in Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery

The Role of Transoral Robotic Palatine and Lingual Tonsillectomy in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck Region.

The use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) lingual tonsillectomy in the diagnostic algorithm for head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) has gained recent popularity. The primary aim of our study was to determine the identification rate of primary tumors in our cohort undergoing lingual ± palatine tonsillectomy for the workup of head and neck CUP. This was a retrospective study of all patients undergoing diagnostic TORS for head and neck CUP over an eight-year period, across four centers in two countries. Fifty-six patients undergoing TORS to aid diagnosis of a primary site were included. Overall, TORS lingual ± palatine tonsillectomy identified a primary tumor in 41 (73.2%) patients. Over half were T1 tumors, with 25% measuring under 10 mm. Among those with human papilloma virus (HPV)+ nodal disease, the identification rate was 82.6%. TORS lingual tonsillectomy is an effective addition to the diagnostic workup of CUP, particularly in those with HPV+ nodal disease.

Experience-based transition to robotic surgery in an experienced program in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.

The adoption of robotic techniques in liver surgery introduces significant challenges for their safe integration within hepatobiliary surgery units. This study is designed to investigate the complexities associated with establishing a robotic surgery program. Data on robotic hepatobiliary surgeries were prospectively collected from October 2021 to October 2023. Historical cohorts from the institutional experiences for comparison were hand-assisted (HALS) and purely laparoscopic procedures (PLS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching were employed to compare outcomes between PLS and robotic resections. The learning curve for robotic surgeries was evaluated by the cumulative sum method. In this study, 454 patients were enrolled (113 robotic surgeries, 157 HALS, and 184 PLS). The posterosuperior segments resections were significantly higher in the robotic group (47.8%) compared to PLS (31.5%) and HALS (35.7%). There were no conversions in the robotic group, in PLS 2.7% and HALS 3.8%. The degree of difficulty according to the median of the IWATE score and IMM score was significantly higher in the robot group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively). No significant differences in short-term outcomes were observed between robotic procedures and PLS in a matched subset of patients. Operative efficiency and blood loss improved significantly after the 75th robotic surgery patient, with high-difficulty cases (IWATE ≥ 10) incorporated from the beginning. This study suggests that robotic liver surgery in units with prior experience in minimally invasive liver surgery offers benefits, such as a lower conversion rate and a higher rate of successful difficult resections.

Clinical analysis of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of large pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a study of 29 cases

This study aimed to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robotic surgery (control group) versus traditional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of large (tumor size >6 cm) pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. The evaluation was based on intraoperative metrics such as operative time, blood loss, conversion to open surgery rates, postoperative drain duration, and length of postoperative hospital stay. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 29 patients (14 males and 15 females) who underwent Da Vinci robotic surgery for large (greater than 6 cm) pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas from October 2019 to September 2023. The average maximum tumor diameter was (7.2±1.6) cm. During the same period, 32 patients underwent laparoscopic resection of challenging pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas.Data showed no significant differences between the two groups, except for the norepinephrine levels. Operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative drainage duration, and length of hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups. The differences between the groups were analyzed using the t-test, and the conversion rates were compared using the chi-square (χ²) test. All surgeries were successfully performed. One patient underwent a one-stage bilateral tumor resection. In the Da Vinci robotic surgery group, the average operative time was (76±32) minutes, compared to (106±45) minutes in the control group (P=0.003). The average intraoperative blood loss was (95±75) ml, compared to (160±90) ml in the control group (P=0.019). The conversion rate to open surgery was 2 cases (6.9%) in the robotic group compared to 5 cases (15.6%) in the control group (P=0.031). The average postoperative drainage duration was (3.0±1.0) days, compared to (3.5±1.5) days in the control group (P=0.128). The average length of hospital stay was (4.5±1.2) days, compared to (4.7±2.2) days in the control group (P=0.657). Postoperative pathological diagnosis confirmed pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Blood pressure normalized within 1 to 3 months postoperatively, with an average systolic blood pressure of (116±13) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa）and diastolic blood pressure of (73±5) mmHg in the robotic surgery group. Follow-up for 3 to 40 months showed normal levels of blood catecholamines and no recurrence or metastasis on follow-up imaging studies, including chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT scans. The average levels of 3-methoxy-norepinephrine, 3-methoxy-epinephrine, and 3-methoxy-tyramine were (0.42±0.21) nmol/L (normal value≤1.05 nmol/L), (0.11±0.07) nmol/L (normal value≤0.32 nmol/L), and (0.017±0.006) nmol/L (normal value≤0.036 nmol/L), respectively. This study demonstrates that for the treatment of large pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, the Da Vinci robotic technique offers advantages such as high-definition visualization, precise operation, and flexibility. These advantages enable the safe and efficient completion of surgeries, as evidenced by shorter operative times, less blood loss, and lower conversion rates.

Rise of the robots: implementing robotic surgery into the acute care surgery practice.

Acute Care Surgery (ACS) admissions and procedures are substantially increasing. ACS disproportionally accounts for a majority of morbidity and mortality among surgical patients. Minimally invasive techniques are associated with improved outcomes and shorter hospital length of stay within the ACS population. While laparoscopy is widespread, ACS surgeons have been slower to adopt the use of robotics. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating robotic surgery within ACS practice. Robotic General Surgery operations performed by 8 Acute Care Surgeons from 5 local facilities within a large integrated healthcare system were queried over a 15 month period. Patients who underwent emergent, urgent, sub-acute, and elective robotic operations by ACS staff were identified. Demographics collected included age, gender, BMI, and ASA score. Outcomes recorded included procedure classification, total supply and implant charges (TSI), conversion to open, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30 day readmission, and 30 day mortality. Of 200 operations, the most common were Cholecystectomy (43.5%), Inguinal hernia repair (26.0%), Ventral hernia repair (18.0%), Appendectomy (5.0%), and Sigmoid Colectomy (3.5%). The median (± std dev) age was 48 ± 16.66years and BMI was 29.9 ± 8.79kg/m2. 46% of cases were sub-acute (n = 92), 33.5% were elective (n = 67), 14% were emergent (n = 28), and 6.5% were urgent (n = 13). Most patients were ASA 2 (107, 46.1%) or ASA 3 (71, 45.9%). The median (IQR) TSI and LOS were $1,770 (889.50) USD and 0.1 (0.9) days. Forty-one inpatient procedures were performed. Median LOS was 3days and expected LOS was 3.1days (O:E = 0.96). Five patients were readmitted within 30days, and there were no deaths within 30days. Robotic techniques may be safely implemented by ACS surgeons, potentially benefitting both patient and surgeon. LOS was similar between laparoscopic and robotic cases and only two cases required conversion to an open procedure. Next steps include a multi-center prospective trial comparing robotic to laparoscopic cases.