Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair Research Articles

Laparoscopic vs robotic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of learning curves and skill transference in general surgery residents.

There is no consensus on whether laparoscopic experience should be a prerequisite for robotic training. Further, there is limited information on skill transference between laparoscopic and robotic techniques. This study focused on the general surgery residents' learning curve and skill transference within the twominimally invasive platforms. General surgery residents were observed during the performance of laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repairs. The recorded data included objective measures (operative time, resident participation indicated by percent active time on console or laparoscopy relative to total case time, number of handoffs between the resident and attending), and subjective evaluations (preceptor and trainee assessments of operative performance) while controlling for case complexity, patient comorbidities, and residents' prior operative experience. Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Pearson Correlation coefficients were used for analysis. Twenty laparoscopic and forty-four robotic cases were observed. Mean operative times were 90min for robotic and 95min for laparoscopic cases (P = 0.4590). Residents' active participation time was 66% on the robotic platform and 37% for laparoscopic (P = < 0.0001). On average, hand-offs occurred 9.7 times during robotic cases and 6.3 times during laparoscopic cases (P = 0.0131). The mean number of cases per resident was 5.86 robotic and 1.67 laparoscopic (P = 0.0312). For robotic cases, there was a strong correlation between percent active resident participation and their prior robotic experience (r = 0.78) while there was a weaker correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.47). On the other hand, prior robotic experience had minimal correlation with the percent active resident participation in laparoscopic cases (r = 0.12) and a weak correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.37). The robotic platform may be a more effective teaching tool with a higher degree of entrustability indicated by the higher mean resident participation. We observed a greater degree of skill transference from laparoscopy to the robot, indicated by a higher degree of correlation between the resident's prior laparoscopic experience and the percent console time in robotic cases. There was minimal correlation between residents' prior robotic experience and their participation in laparoscopic cases. Our findings suggest that the learning curve for the robot may be shorter as prior robotic experience had a much stronger association with future robotic performance compared to the association observed in laparoscopy.

Robotic hernia repair: the trainee "Drag" factor-a single-surgeon 9-year experience.

The use of robotic assisted surgery is increasing but training residents in its use may be associated with increased operative time and cost. The objective of this study is to compare the operative time of robotic incisional/ventral hernia repair (RIVHR) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) when performed with and without a resident or fellow trainee. A review of prospectively collected data was performed on all patients who underwent RIVHR and RIHR by a single surgeon over a 9-year period (2014-2023). Study variables included presence of trainee (resident or fellow), procedure time, console time, and recurrent hernia. Primary outcomes include procedure time and console time. A total of 402 surgeries were included for analysis. Residents assisted in 190 (47%) of the procedures, while fellows assisted in 97 (24%), and 115 (29%) were performed without a trainee. Median (IQR) console times in RIVHR assisted by fellows was 102 (72-145) minutes, compared to 90 (71-129) minutes among surgeries assisted by residents and 65 (52-82) minutes among surgeries performed without a trainee (p < 0.0001), a similar trend was observed for RIHR. The duration of hernia repair assisted by trainees was significantly longer than surgeries performed without a trainee. Operative time for RIVHR and RIHR is significantly lower when performed without a trainee. However, RIHR assisted by residents showed a consistent decrease in operative time over the 9-year period.

Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia—early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS)

PurposeWith robotic surgical devices, an innovative tool has stepped into the arena of minimally invasive hernia surgery. It combines the advantages of open (low recurrence rates and ability to perform complex procedure such as transverse abdominis release) and laparoscopic surgery (low rate of wound and mesh infections, less pain). However, a superiority to standard minimally invasive procedures has not yet been proven. We present our first experiences of robotic mesh repair of incisional hernias and a comparison of our results with open and minimally invasive sublay techniques.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted mesh repair (RAHR) for incisional hernia between April and November 2022 (RAHR group) and patients who underwent open sublay (Sublay group) or eMILOS hernia repair (eMILOS group) between January 2018 and November 2022 was carried out. Patients in the RAHR group were matched 1:2 to patients in the Sublay group by propensity score matching. Patient demographics, preoperative hernia characteristics and cause of hernia, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of only midline hernia was performed.ResultsA total of 21 patients received robotic-assisted incisional hernia repair. Procedures performed included robotic retro-muscular hernia repair (r-RMHR, 76%), with transverse abdominis release in 56% of the cases. In one patient, r-RHMR was combined with robotic inguinal hernia repair. Two patients (10%) were operated with total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP). Robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (r-TAPP) was performed in three patients (14%).Median (range) operating time in the RAHR group was significantly longer than in the sublay and eMILOS group (291 (122–311) vs. 109.5 (48–270) min vs. 123 (100–192) min, respectively, p < 0.001). The meshes applied in the RAHR group were significantly compared to the sublay (mean (SD) 529 ± 311 cm2 vs. 356 ± 231, p = 0.037), but without a difference compared to the eMILOS group (mean (SD) 596 ± 266 cm2). Median (range) length of hospital stay in the RAHR group was significantly shorter compared to the Sublay group (3 (2–7) vs. 5 (1–9) days, p = 0.032), but not significantly different to the eMILOS group. In short term follow-up, no hernia recurrence was observed in the RAHR and eMILOS group, with 9% in the Sublay group. The subgroup analysis of midline hernia revealed very similar results.ConclusionOur data show a promising outcome after robotic-assisted incisional hernia repair, but no superiority compared to the eMILOS technique. However, RAHR is a promising technique especially for complex hernia in patients with relevant risk factors, especially immunosuppression. Longer follow-up times are needed to accurately assess recurrence rates, and large prospective trials are needed to show superiority of robotic compared to standard open and minimally invasive hernia repair.

Robotic inguinal hernia repair with the new Hugo RASTM system: first worldwide case series report

Introduction Robotic-assisted surgery has been a part of surgical procedures for more than two decades. Recently new robotic platforms with a different design entered the market. The modular design with independent arms enables increased flexibility of arm docking to increase the range of motion and instrument maneuverability. We herein present the first case series of robotic inguinal hernia repair using the Hugo RAS system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Material and methods Thirteen inguinal hernia repairs were performed on ten patients. A description of the Hugo RAS system as well as the new concept of modular design is presented along with the description of the operation setup. Results Mean docking time was 9.5 min and mean console time was 50.3 min and 74.7 min for unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia repair, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. There was one conversion to laparoscopic surgery due to a technical issue with the robot. Conclusions: The modular design of independent arms seems to enhance maneuverability of the instruments and contribute to fewer arm collisions. Further clinical data and experience with this new surgical system are necessary to understand if this new design has advantages over the standard robotic platforms.

SP9.12 The Global Practice of Inguinal Hernia Repair Study (GLACIER): A survey of 1014 hernia surgeons

Abstract Introduction There are many variations in practices and preferences for inguinal hernia repair among surgeons globally. The purpose of the Global Practice of Inguinal Hernia Repair Study (GLACIER) was to capture these variations related to open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair. Method A questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey® was created, and the link was shared freely on various social media platforms, personal email network of authors and email to members of the endorsed organisations, which include British Hernia Society (BHS), The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Society (TUGSS), and Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). Results A total of 1014 surgeons from 81 countries completed the survey. Open and laparoscopic approaches were equally preferred (43% and 47% respectively). Transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP) is the favoured minimally invasive approach. Bilateral and recurrent hernia following previous open repair were the most common indications for minimally invasive approach. Repair with a mesh was preferred by 98% of the surgeons and synthetic monofilament light weight mesh with large pores was the most common choice. Lichtenstein repair was the most favoured open mesh repair technique (90%), while Shouldice repair was the favoured non-mesh repair technique. The risk of chronic groin pain was quoted as 5% after open repair and, 1% after minimally invasive repair. Only 10% of surgeons preferred open repair with local anaesthesia. Conclusion This survey identified similarities and variations in practice globally along with some discrepancies in inguinal hernia repair compared to best practice guidelines. It also identifies several key areas where more focus future research is required.

Bringing Artificial Intelligence to the operating room: edge computing for real-time surgical phase recognition.

Automation of surgical phase recognition is a key effort toward the development of Computer Vision (CV) algorithms, for workflow optimization and video-based assessment. CV is a form of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that allows interpretation of images through a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm. The improvements in Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) computing devices allow researchers to apply these algorithms for recognition of content in videos in real-time. Edge computing, where data is collected, analyzed, and acted upon in close proximity to the collection source, is essential meet the demands of workflow optimization by providing real-time algorithm application. We implemented a real-time phase recognition workflow and demonstrated its performance on 10 Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repairs (RIHR) to obtain phase predictions during the procedure. Our phase recognition algorithm was developed with 211 videos of RIHR originally annotated into 14 surgical phases. Using these videos, a DL model with a ResNet-50 backbone was trained and validated to automatically recognize surgical phases. The model was deployed to a GPU, the Nvidia® Jetson Xavier™ NX edge computing device. This model was tested on 10 inguinal hernia repairs from four surgeons in real-time. The model was improved using post-recording processing methods such as phase merging into seven final phases (peritoneal scoring, mesh placement, preperitoneal dissection, reduction of hernia, out of body, peritoneal closure, and transitionary idle) and averaging of frames. Predictions were made once per second with a processing latency of approximately 250ms. The accuracy of the real-time predictions ranged from 59.8 to 78.2% with an average accuracy of 68.7%. A real-time phase prediction of RIHR using a CV deep learning model was successfully implemented. This real-time CV phase segmentation system can be useful for monitoring surgical progress and be integrated into software to provide hospital workflow optimization.

Kinematic data profile and clinical outcomes in robotic inguinal hernia repairs: a pilot study.

Surgical training requires clinical knowledge and technical skills to operate safely and optimize clinical outcomes. Technical skills are hard to measure. The Intuitive Data Recorder (IDR), (Sunnyvale, CA) allows for the measurement of technical skills using objective performance indicators (OPIs) from kinematic event data. Our goal was to determine whether OPIs improve with surgeon experience and whether they are correlated with clinical outcomes for robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR). The IDR was used to record RIHRs from six surgeons. Data were obtained from 98 inguinal hernia repairs from February 2022 to February 2023. Patients were called on postoperative days 5-10 and asked to take the Carolina Comfort Scale (CCS) survey to evaluate acute clinical outcomes. A Pearson test was run to determine correlations between OPIs from the IDR with a surgeon's yearly RIHR experience and with CCS scores. Linear regression was then run for correlated OPIs. Multiple OPIs were correlated with surgeon experience. Specifically, for the task of peritoneal flap exploration, we found that 23 OPIs were significantly correlated with surgeons' 1-year RIHR case number. Total angular motion distance of the left arm instrument had a correlation of - 0.238 (95% CI - 0.417, - 0.042) for RIHR yearly case number. Total angular motion distance of right arm instrument was also negatively correlated with RIHR in 1year with a correlation of - 0.242 (95% CI - 0.420, - 0.046). For clinical outcomes, wrist articulation of the surgeon's console positively correlated with acute sensation scores from the CCS with a correlation of 0.453 (95% CI 0.013, 0.746). This study defines multiple OPIs that correlate with surgeon experience and with outcomes. Using this knowledge, surgical simulation platforms can be designed to teach patterns to surgical trainees that are associated with increased surgical experience and with improved postoperative outcomes.

An international survey of 1014 hernia surgeons: outcome of GLACIER (global practice of inguinal hernia repair) study.

The practice of inguinal hernia repair varies internationally. The global practice of inguinal hernia repair study (GLACIER) aimed to capture these variations in open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair. A questionnaire-based survey was created on a web-based platform, and the link was shared on various social media platforms, personal e-mail network of authors, and e-mails to members of the endorsed organisations, which include British Hernia Society (BHS), The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Society (TUGSS), and Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). A total of 1014 surgeons from 81 countries completed the survey. Open and laparoscopic approaches were preferred by 43% and 47% of participants, respectively. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP) was the favoured minimally invasive approach. Bilateral and recurrent hernia following previous open repair were the most common indications for a minimally invasive procedure. Ninety-eight percent of the surgeons preferred repair with a mesh, and synthetic monofilament lightweight mesh with large pores was the most common choice. Lichtenstein repair was the most favoured open mesh repair technique (90%), while Shouldice repair was the favoured non-mesh repair technique. The risk of chronic groin pain was quoted as 5% after open repair and 1% after minimally invasive repair. Only 10% of surgeons preferred to perform an open repair using local anaesthesia. This survey identified similarities and variations in practice internationally and some discrepancies in inguinal hernia repair compared to best practice guidelines, such as low rates of repair using local anaesthesia and the use of lightweight mesh for minimally invasive repair. It also identifies several key areas for future research, such as incidence, risk factors, and management of chronic groin pain after hernia surgery and the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic hernia surgery.

Is Robotic Console Time a Surrogate for Resident Operative Autonomy?

Robotic-assisted surgery is an increasing part of general surgery training, but resident autonomy on the robotic platform can be hard to quantify. Robotic console time (RCT), the percentage of time the resident controls the console, may be an appropriate measure of resident operative autonomy. This study aims to characterize the correlation between objective resident RCT and subjectively scored operative autonomy. Using a validated resident performance evaluation instrument, we collected resident operative autonomy ratings from residents and attendings performing robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (IH) at a university-based general surgery program between 9/2020-6/2021. We then extracted RCT data from the Intuitive surgical system. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and ANOVA were performed. A total of 31 robotic operations (13 RC, 18 IH) performed by 4 attending surgeons and 8 residents (4 junior, 4 senior) were matched and included. 83.9% of cases were scored by both attending and resident. The average RCT per case was 35.6%(95% CI 13.0%,58.3%) for junior residents (PGY 2-3) and 59.7%(CI 51.1%,68.3%) for senior residents (PGY 4-5). The mean autonomy evaluated by residents was 3.29(CI 2.85,3.73) out of a maximum score of 5, while the mean autonomy evaluated by attendings was 4.12(CI 3.68,4.55). RCT significantly correlated with subjective evaluations of resident autonomy (r=0.61, p=0.0003). RCT also moderately correlated with resident training level (r=0.5306, p<0.0001). Neither attending robotic experience nor operation type significantly correlated with RCT or autonomy evaluation scores. Our study suggests that resident console time is a valid surrogate for resident operative autonomy in robotic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. RCT may be a valuable measure in objective assessment of residents' operative autonomy and training efficiency. Future investigation into how RCT correlates with subjective and objective autonomy metrics such as verbal guidance or distinguishing critical operative steps is needed to validate the study findings further.

Mesh-based inguinal hernia repairs in an integrated healthcare system and surgeon and hospital volume: a cohort study of 110,808 patients from over a decade.

The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair within a United States-based integrated healthcare system (IHS) and evaluate the risk for postoperative events by surgeon and hospital volume within each surgical approach, open, laparoscopic, and robotic. Patients aged ≥ 18years who underwent their first inguinal hernia repair were identified for a cohort study (2010-2020). Average annual surgeon and hospital volume were broken into quartiles with the lowest volume quartile as the reference group. Multiple Cox regression evaluated risk for ipsilateral reoperation following repair by volume. All analyses werestratified by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). 110,808 patients underwent 131,629 inguinal hernia repairs during the study years; procedures were performed by 897 surgeons at 36 hospitals. Most repairs were open (65.4%), followed by laparoscopic (33.5%) and robotic (1.1%). Reoperation rates at 5 and 10years of follow-up were 2.4% and 3.4%, respectively; rates were similar across surgical groups. In adjusted analysis, surgeons with higher laparoscopic volumes had a lower reoperation risk (27-46average annual repairs: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74; ≥ 47 repairs: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.64) compared to those in the lowest volume quartile (< 14 averageannualrepairs). No differences in reoperation rates were observed in reference to surgeon or hospital volume following open or robotic inguinal hernia repair. High-volume surgeons may reduce reoperation risk following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. We hope to better identify additional risk factors for inguinal hernia repair complications and improve patient outcomes with future studies.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repairs: A Five-Year Mixed Retrospective-Prospective Study in a Single Tertiary Institution and Affiliated Surgical Centers

DePolo, Nicole MD; Assali, Marc Abou MD; Lee, Sarah MD; Oyoyo, Udochukwu MPH; Quispe Espiritu, Juan C MD; Scharf, Keith R DO, FACS, FASMBS; Srikureja, Daniel P MD, FACS; Mukherjee, Kaushik MD, FACS; Yung, Wing Sze Esther MD, FACS Author Information

Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Update 2022 during the SARS-COVID-19 Pandemic.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by general surgeons. Numerous articles have shown that robotic inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective, but also more costly than other hernia repair techniques. The robotic platform uses high-definition visualization and articulating instruments. A growing number of surgeons are using this technology to refine and obtain a critical view of the myopectineal orifice for hernia repair while lessening the pain associated with the open surgical approach. Lower insufflation pressures and good results without Foley catheterization have been reported. This report presents an update, with a focus on the past 3 years during the SARS COVID-19 pandemic, of a series of robotic, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic hernia experience at a single institution, along with a review of the recent current literature. Over 3000 laparoscopic inguinal hernia operations have been performed by the author since 1990. One hundred-fifty-eight were performed from April 2020 to November 2022, in addition to the previously reported 420 robotic TAPP (trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal) procedures performed from April 2012 to March 2020. Hospital records and follow-up care were prospectively reviewed and the patient's age, sex, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) class and operative time were obtained. Follow-up was done at 2 weeks and 6 weeks following surgery. All patients consented to the use of their data in the study. Ninety-four percent (94%) of the patients were male. The average age was 64.3 years (range 18-91). Co-morbidities included hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, prostatism and GERD, among others. BMI was between 19 and 37.1 (mean 26.1). In 23 patients (15%), an umbilical hernia repair was performed concomitantly. OR time ranged from 25 to 90 minutes (mean 51.8). Complications were uncommon and urinary retention (2.5%) was an infrequent post-operative occurrence. 1) Use of a lower insufflation pressure (8-12 mm Hg) was routine. 2) Use of a structural mesh (4x6 inches) gave satisfactory results. 3) While fixation of the mesh was not necessary, fibrin sealant was used routinely. 4) Urinary retention was infrequent, and did not require pre- or intra-op Foley catheterization if the patient voided immediately prior to surgery. Finally, 5) OR time was consistently less than 1 hour. These results support the conclusion that robotic inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective.

Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair.

To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical impact of the clinical outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair. Patients who underwent RIHR 2 years before and after March 10, 2020, were included in this retrospective study and assigned accordingly to the pre- or post-COVID group. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables including patients' demographics, hernia characteristics, complications, and hernia recurrence rates were compared between groups. 183 (94.5% male) and 141 (96.4% male) patients were assigned to the pre- and post-COVID groups, respectively. Patient demographics and medical comorbidities did not differ between groups. Operative time was approximately 40min longer in the post-COVID group (p < 0.001) with higher rates of bilateral IHR (pre-COVID: 30.1% vs. post-COVID: 46.4%, p = 0.003). Mesh material differed between groups with predominance of polyester mesh in the pre-COVID group vs. polypropylene in the post-COVID one. Median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 0days in both groups, and same-day discharge rates were 93.4% pre-pandemic and 92.8% post-pandemic (p = 0.09). There were no pulmonary complications recorded in either group or no cases of COVID-19 detected within two weeks postoperatively in the post-COVID group. Seromas were more frequent in the post-COVID group (pre-COVID: 2 vs. post-COVID: 8, p = 0.018) and no hernia recurrences were recorded. This is the first study to describe the impact of COVID-19 on RIHR. Clinical outcomes and hernia-specific complications were not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Robot-assisted repair of complicated inguinal hernia: Advantages in comparison with conventional repair

Abstract The adoption rate of robot-assisted surgery has skyrocketed in recent years, despite limited evidence, an unclear clinical benefit, and an increase in cost. The laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair by either transabdominal or extraperitoneal approach has gradually gained traction owing to distinct advantages over traditional open repairs. Although robotic inguinal hernia repair has been established as a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy, as of yet no superiority has been proven. We aim to give an overview of certain clinical situations, in which the robot might be advantageous. Specifically, we discuss inguinoscrotal hernia repair, inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy, and mesh explantation. In our opinion, robotic systems are an invaluable tool in the case of mesh resection or recurrence after previous anterior and posterior repairs. With the increased expansion of the surgical tools and techniques to repair abdominal wall problems, a definitive and clear rule as to which cases should be handled robotically and which should not will be difficult and probably unattainable. We are very much proponents of a tailored approach, where every individual case deserves its surgical plan, bearing in mind all aspects of a patient, with the aim of the best surgical outcome.

One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.

The robotic platform, an extension of minimally invasive procedures, is distributed nationwide and readily available. However, its application in inguinal hernia repair seems rare in Korea. This report aims to share our initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair. The patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair by 2 different surgeons with different experiences at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical procedures were performed on all patients using the Da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc). Patient demographics, operation variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 35 patients underwent robotic inguinal hernia repairs consecutively. The mean age was 55.03 ± 18.20 years. The majority of patients were male. The overall mean operation time was 103.98 ± 47.92 minutes for unilateral hernia surgery and 139.28 ± 46.07 minutes for bilateral surgery. None of the patients experienced intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were noticed in 8 patients: 3 with seroma formation, 1 with hematoma, 1 with superficial surgical site infection, and 3 with persistent pain at the operation site. This report demonstrates an early experience of hernia surgery using the robotic platform. The robotic approach for transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair was completed without any significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. It may be a viable option as a minimally invasive technique. Cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for the robotic approach remain to be further investigated.

Does the mesh type influence the outcomes and costs of robotic inguinal hernia repair?

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and hospital costs associated with two different meshes in robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (IHR). Patients who underwent IHR were assigned to either the polyester self-gripping (PSG) or the polypropylene (PP) group depending on the mesh used. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to obtain balanced populations. Postoperative variables included complications such as surgical site events and recurrences. Hospital costs included all possible expenses generated by the surgery during the hospitalization period. From a database of IHR performed between February 2012 and July 2022, 131 PSG patients were matched to 131 PP repairs. Median operative time was shorter in the PSG group [55 (40-78) vs. 80 (60-116) minutes, p < 0.001]. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Patients who received the PSG mesh experience reduced immediate postoperative pain compared to the PP group. Average follow-up time was 35.2months in the PSG group vs. 12.5months in the PP group (p < 0.001). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was comparable in both groups (p = 0.489), with no surgical site infections logged. No cases of chronic pain were noted. Only two recurrences were recorded in the cohort, both of them in the PSG repairs. Hospital costs were USD $232 higher in the PP group but did not statistically differ (p = 0.523). There were no differences between the polyester self-gripping and the polypropylene mesh in terms of postoperative complications, clinical outcomes and hospital costs. Surgeons may opt for either meshes depending on their preferences and familiarity with each of the products.

Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is the new Da Vinci single port platform providing any benefit?

The utilization of the robot for inguinal hernia repairs has increased in the past years. The new Da Vinci Single Port (SP) system provides the benefits of single-incision procedures and might overcome the technical difficulties of previous single-incision techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the SP transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (SP-TAPP) and compare its outcomes to the robotic multiport technique (MP-TAPP). A prospective cohort of patients who underwent a robotic SP-TAPP and MP-TAPP between 2012 and 2022 was analyzed. Primary endpoints were same-day discharge, morbidity, and inguinal recurrence rates. Secondary endpoints included conversion, operative time, port-site incisional hernia, and chronic pain. MP-TAPP and SP-TAPP were performed in 378 (81.3%) and 87 (18.7%) patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. There were no conversions or intraoperative complications. Mean operative (MP-TAPP: 93.2 vs. SP-TAPP: 78.1min, p = 0.003) and recovery time (MP-TAPP: 160.8 vs SP-TAPP: 112.6min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SP group. Same-day discharge rate was higher (MP-TAPP: 86.5% vs. SP-TAPP: 97.7%, p = 0.001) after SP-TAPP; 30-day morbidity, readmissions, and chronic pain rates were similar between groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.6months for MP-TAPP and 13.3months for SP-TAPP, inguinal hernia recurrence and port-site incisional rates were similar between groups. Robotic SP-TAPP is safe and feasible. When compared to MP-TAPP, it showed similar postoperative morbidity, higher same-day discharge rates, and a quicker postoperative recovery. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of the SP platform.

The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.

Degree of resident participation in a case is often used as a surrogate marker for operative autonomy, an essential element of surgical resident training. Previous studies have demonstrated a considerable disagreement between the perceptions of attending surgeons and trainees when it comes to estimating operative participation. The Da Vinci Surgical System dual console interface allows machine generated measurements of trainee's active participation, which has the potential to obviate the need for labor intensive direct observation of surgical procedures. However, the robotic metrics require validation. We present a comparison of operative participation as perceived by the resident, faculty, trained research staff observer (gold standard), and robotic machine generated data. A total of 28 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repair procedures were observed by research staff. Operative time, percent active time for the resident, and number of handoffs between the resident and attending were recorded by trained research staff in the operating room and the Da Vinci Surgical System. Attending and resident evaluations of operative performance and perceptions of percent active time for the resident were collected using standardized forms and compared with the research staff observed values and the robot-generated console data. Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Pearson Correlation coefficients statistical analysis were performed. Robotic inguinal hernia repair cases had a mean operative time of 91.3 (30) minutes and an attending-rated mean difficulty of 3.1 (1.26) out of 5. Residents were recorded to be the active surgeon 71.8% (17.7) of the total case time by research staff. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.77) in number of handoffs between faculty and trainee as recorded by the research staff and robot (4.28 (2.01) vs. 5.8 (3.04) respectively). The robotic machine generated data demonstrated the highest degree of association when compared to the gold standard (research staff observed data), with r = 0.98, p < 0.0001. Lower levels of association were seen with resident reported (r = 0.66) perceptions and faculty-reported (r = 0.55) perceptions of resident active operative time. Our findings suggest that robot-generated performance metrics are an extremely accurate and reliable measure of intraoperative resident participation indicated by a very strong correlation with the data recorded by research staff's direct observation of the case. Residents demonstrated a more accurate awareness of their degree of participation compared with faculty surgeons. With high accuracy and ease of use, robotic surgical system performance metrics have the potential to be a valuable tool in surgical training and skill assessment.

Short-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair during robotic prostatectomy – An analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative

BackgroundConcomitant robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) has been reported. Nevertheless, data on its safety is lacking and some surgeons avoid performing both operations concurrently due to the potential risk of mesh related complications in the setting of a fresh vesicourethral anastomosis. We aimed to investigate differences in 30-day outcomes between patients undergoing RALP+RIHR and those undergoing RIHR alone. MethodsPatients who have undergone concomitant RALP and RIHR with 30-day follow-up available were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Using a propensity score algorithm, they were matched with a cohort of patients undergoing RIHR alone based on confounders such as body mass index, age, ASA class, smoking, hernia size and recurrent status and prior pelvic operation. The groups were compared for 30-day rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site occurrences requiring operative intervention (SSOPI) and hernia recurrence. Results24 patients underwent RALP + RIHR and were matched to 72 patients who underwent RIHR alone (3:1). Median age was 64 years, 33% were obese and 17% smokers. No significant differences were found on 30-day rates of overall complications (21% RALP + RIHR vs. 15% RIHR, p = 0.53) and surgical site occurrences (12% RALP + RIHR vs.11% RIHR, p = 0.85). No patient in the RALP + RIHR group had a 30-day SSI, SSOPI or early recurrence. ConclusionRALP+RIHR appears not to result in increased rates of wound complications, overall complications or early recurrence when compared to patient undergoing RIHR alone. Prospective, controlled studies with larger number of patients are needed to confirm our findings.

Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery

BackgroundThe ideal approach to inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is not agreed upon. We compared safety and outcomes of IHR between open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. MethodsThis retrospective review of a prospective database analyzed demographic, perioperative, and quality of life data for patients who underwent IHR after pelvic or low abdominal surgery. Results286 qualifying patients underwent IHR between 2008 and 2020; 119 open, 147 laparoscopic, and 20 robotic. Laparoscopic repair led to faster cessation of narcotics and return to ADLs than open repair (all p <0.05). Post-operative complications, 30-day readmission, recurrences, and quality of life outcomes were equivalent, except less pain at 3-weeks post-op in the minimally invasive groups, p < 0.01. ConclusionMinimally invasive IHR after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is safe compared to an open approach. Laparoscopic repair provides faster recovery, yet patient satisfaction is equivalent regardless of surgical approach.