Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery

Abstract

BackgroundThe ideal approach to inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is not agreed upon. We compared safety and outcomes of IHR between open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. MethodsThis retrospective review of a prospective database analyzed demographic, perioperative, and quality of life data for patients who underwent IHR after pelvic or low abdominal surgery. Results286 qualifying patients underwent IHR between 2008 and 2020; 119 open, 147 laparoscopic, and 20 robotic. Laparoscopic repair led to faster cessation of narcotics and return to ADLs than open repair (all p <0.05). Post-operative complications, 30-day readmission, recurrences, and quality of life outcomes were equivalent, except less pain at 3-weeks post-op in the minimally invasive groups, p < 0.01. ConclusionMinimally invasive IHR after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery is safe compared to an open approach. Laparoscopic repair provides faster recovery, yet patient satisfaction is equivalent regardless of surgical approach.