Robotic Arm Assistance Research Articles

Navigation and 3D-imaging in pelvic ring surgery: a systematic review of prospective comparative studies.

Few literature reviews have been published focusing on navigation, robotic or pre-operative planning using 3D-imaging technology (3D-printing, 3D-planning). To our knowledge, no reviews have been performed to assess and compare all these modalities together versus control groups (conventional fluoroscopy) through high Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Prospective Control Studies (PCSs). The aim of this study was to assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures through high level studies. A literature search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane library and Google scholar using keywords up to December 2023. Only prospective comparative studies (RCT and PCS) were included. A total of 341 articles were identified, 39 articles were selected for full-text analysis leaving 7 articles included in this literature systematic review. A trend towards improved precision in screw placement and reduction of radiation exposure without consequences in term of functional outcomes have been identified. No conclusions can be extrapolated regarding operative time and blood loss except for robotic which improve these parameters because robotic arm assistance help surgeons to correctly follow the planning based on 2D-fluoroscopy. Surgery duration and radiation dose are significantly reduced with robotic-arm assistance for the same reasons. With navigation the results have to be nuanced according to the experience of the surgical team. Interest of navigation is emphasized in sacral dysmorphism in comparison with conventional fluoroscopy. This highlights the benefits of navigation for ilio-sacral screw placement in difficult cases and less experimented teams. High level studies which assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures are low. To date and according to the present high level literature, navigation and 3D-technologies in pelvic ring surgery should be recommended for difficult cases. Systematic review of Level II studies.

Fewer Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance or Fluoroscopic Guidance

BackgroundComputer navigation and robotic assistance may reduce total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocations by improving the accuracy and precision of component positioning. We investigated dislocation rates for THAs using conventional techniques, robotic assistance, and computer navigation, while controlling for surgical approach, dual mobility (DM) use, and fluoroscopic guidance. MethodsWe reviewed 11,740 primary THAs performed between June 2016 and December 2022, including 5,873 conventional, 1,293 with robotic-arm assistance, and 4,574 with navigation. The approach was posterior in 6,580 (56.0%), anterior in 4,342 (37.0%), and lateral in 818 (7.0%). A DM was used in 10.4%. Fluoroscopy was used in 3,653 cases and only with the anterior approach. Multivariate analyses yielded odds ratios (OR) for dislocation and revision. Additional regression analyses for dislocation were performed for approach and DM. ResultsRaw dislocation rates were as follows: conventional 1.2%, robotic 0.4%, navigation 0.9%, anterior with fluoroscopy 0.4%, anterior without fluoroscopy 2.3%, posterior 1.3%, and lateral 0.5%. Upon multivariate analysis, use of robotics was found to be associated with significantly reduced dislocation risk compared to conventional (OR: 0.3), as did anterior (OR: 0.6) compared to posterior approach; navigation and lateral approach were not found to be associated with a significant reduction in risk. For the anterior approach, multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluoroscopy significantly reduced dislocation risk (OR: 0.1), while DM, robotics, and navigation were not significant. For the posterior approach, the dislocation risk was lower with robotics than with conventional (OR: 0.2); the use of navigation or DM did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk. ConclusionsThe use of robotics was associated with a reduction in dislocations for this cohort overall. Further, fluoroscopy in the anterior approach and robotic assistance in the posterior approach were both associated with decreased dislocation risk. The role of imageless computer navigation and DM implants requires further study.

Can Robotic-Arm Assistance Decrease Iatrogenic Soft-Tissue Damage During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Manual techniques for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been widely utilized and proven to be clinically successful. However, the use of advanced computed tomography (CT) scan-based planning and haptically-bounded reamers in robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) holds promise for potentially limiting surrounding soft-tissue damage. This cadaver-based study aimed to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage between a robotic-arm assisted, haptically-guided THA (RTHA) and a manual, fluoroscopic-guided THA (MTHA) direct anterior approach. There were six fresh-frozen torso-to-toe cadaver specimens included, with two surgeons each performing three RTHA and three MTHA procedures. One hip underwent an RTHA and the other hip received an MTHA in each cadaver. Postoperatively, one additional surgeon, blinded to the procedures, assessed and graded damage to nine key anatomical structures using a 1 to 4 grading scale: (1) complete soft-tissue preservation to <5% of damage; (2) 6 to 25% of damage; (3) 26 to 75% of damage; and (4) 76 to 100% of damage. Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis tests were used to compare soft-tissue damage between RTHA and MTHA cases and adjusted for ties. Pooled analysis of the gluteus minimus, sartorius, tensor fascia lata, and vastus lateralis muscle grades demonstrated that cadaver specimens who underwent RTHA underwent less damage to these structures than following MTHA (median, IQR: 1.0, 1.0 to 2.0 vs. 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0; p=0.003). Pooled analysis of the calculated volumetric damage (mm3) for the gluteus minimus, sartorius, tensor fascia lata, and vastus lateralis muscles demonstrated that the cadaver specimens that underwent RTHA underwent less damage to these structures than those that followed MTHA (median, IQR: 23, 2 to 586 vs. 216, 58 to 3,050; p=0.037). This cadaver-based study suggests that utilizing RTHA may lead to reduced soft-tissue damage compared with MTHA, likely due to enhanced preoperative planning with robotic-arm assisted software, real-time intraoperative feedback, haptically-bounded reamer usage, reduced surgical steps, as well as ease of use with reaming. These findings should be carefully considered when evaluating the utilization of robotic-arm assisted THA in practice.

Exploring Control Authority Preferences in Robotic Arm Assistance for Power Wheelchair Users.

This paper uses mixed methods to explore the preliminary design of control authority preferences for an Assistive Robotic Manipulator (ARM). To familiarize users with an intelligent robotic arm, we perform two kitchen task iterations: one with user-initiated software autonomy (predefined autonomous actions) and one with manual control. Then, we introduce a third scenario, enabling users to choose between manual control and system delegation throughout the task. Results showed that, while manually switching modes and controlling the arm via joystick had a higher mental workload, participants still preferred full joystick control. Thematic analysis indicates manual control offered greater freedom and sense of accomplishment. Participants reacted positively to the idea of an interactive assistive system. Users did not want to ask the system to only assist, by taking over for certain actions, but also asked for situational feedback (e.g., 'How close am I (the gripper)?', 'Is the lid centered over the jug?'). This speaks to a future assistive system that ensures the user feels like they drive the system for the entirety of the task and provides action collaboration in addition to more granular situational awareness feedback.

Visualizing Defects of Irregular Weld Seams Based on MultiMode TFM Detection

An image reconstruction method based on the multimode total focusing method (MTFM) is proposed to overcome the limitations of traditional total focusing method (TFM) imaging in detecting tiny discontinuities at complex locations. We conducted MTFM detection and TFM image reconstruction experiments for irregular welds containing multiple discontinuities. In an experiment using four 1 mm diameter manufactured defects fabricated on two aluminum alloy welded test blocks, we achieved two significant contributions. First, we accurately detected small discontinuities by combining CIVA simulation with robotic arm assistance. Second, we proposed fusion factor coefficients for TFM image processing, which considered different modal weights for image fusion and de-noising, thereby preserving the integrity of the fused images. Our experimental results demonstrate that the reconstructed TFM images effectively represented all defect information. Compared with other modal TFM images with the highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the amplitude-corrected optimized TFM image exhibits an improved SNR of 51.95% without losing defect information.

Short term outcomes following robotic arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Robotic-arm assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) is associated with improved accuracy of implant positioning and excellent early functional outcomes. However, there is paucity of evidence regarding outcomes following RA-UKA for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes of lateral compartment UKA, utilising robotic-arm assistance. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 21 consecutive patients who underwent lateral RA-UKA. The study included 9 (42.9%) males and 12 (57.1%) females with a mean age of 63.4 ± 9.2 years. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was measured pre-operatively and at 1-year post-operatively, while range of motion (ROM) and complications were also recorded. There was significant improvement of OKS at 1 year's follow up compared with the baseline score (21.8 ± 5.6 vs. 45.2 ± 2.8 respectively; p < 0.001). There was also an improvement in pre-operative ROM when compared to ROM at 1 year's follow up (123.5° ± 8° vs. 131.5° ± 6.3° respectively; p < 0.001). None of the study patients underwent revision surgery within 1 year's follow-up. In our study, lateral RA-UKA resulted in significant improvements in clinical and patient reported outcomes with low complications rates. Further long-term comparative studies are needed to assess the utility of lateral RA-UKA vs. conventional UKA.

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis

IntroductionUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical treatment for medial compartment arthritis of the knee, yet surgical outcomes are directly related to surgical execution. Robotic arm-assisted surgery aims to address these difficulties by allowing for detailed preoperative planning, real-time intraoperative assessment and haptic-controlled bone removal. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between conventional manual mobile bearing and robot arm-assisted fixed bearing medial UKA in our local population.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective case–control study of 148 UKAs performed at an academic institution with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. 74 robotic arm-assisted UKAs were matched to 74 conventional UKAs via propensity score matching. Radiological outcomes included postoperative mechanical axis and individual component alignment. Clinical parameters included a range of motion, Knee Society knee score and functional assessment taken before, 6 and 12 months after the operation.ResultsRobot arm-assisted UKA produced a more neutral component coronal alignment in both femoral component (robotic -0.2 ± 2.8, manual 2.6 ± 2.3; P = 0.043) and tibial component (robotic -0.3 ± 4.0, manual 1.7 ± 5.3; P < 0.001). While the postoperative mechanical axis was comparable, robot arm-assisted UKA demonstrated a smaller posterior tibial slope (robotic 5.7 ± 2.7, manual 8.2 ± 3.3; P = 0.02). Clinical outcomes did not show any statistically significant differences.ConclusionCompared with conventional UKA, robotic arm-assisted UKA demonstrated improved component alignment and comparable clinical outcomes. Improved radiological accuracy with robotic-arm assistance demonstrated promising early results.

Length of stay and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique and predictors of delayed discharge.

In-hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge dispositions following arthroplasty could act as surrogate measures for improvement in patient pathways, and have major cost saving implications for healthcare providers. With the ever-growing adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty, it is imperative to evaluate its impact on LOS. The objectives of this study were to compare LOS and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) and unicompartmental arthroplasty (RO UKA) versus conventional technique (CO TKA and UKA). This large-scale, single-institution study included patients of any age undergoing primary TKA (n = 1,375) or UKA (n = 337) for any cause between May 2019 and January 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics, LOS, need for post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, anaesthesia type, readmission within 30 days, and discharge dispositions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also employed to identify factors and patient characteristics related to delayed discharge. The median LOS in the RO TKA group was 76 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 54 to 104) versus 82.5 (IQR 58 to 127) in the CO TKA group (p < 0.001) and 54 hours (IQR 34 to 77) in the RO UKA versus 58 (IQR 35 to 81) in the CO UKA (p = 0.031). Discharge dispositions were comparable between the two groups. A higher percentage of patients undergoing CO TKA required PACU admission (8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.040). Our study showed that robotic arm assistance was associated with a shorter LOS in patients undergoing primary UKA and TKA, and no difference in the discharge destinations. Our results suggest that robotic arm assistance could be advantageous in partly addressing the upsurge of knee arthroplasty procedures and the concomitant healthcare burden; however, this needs to be corroborated by long-term cost-effectiveness analyses and data from randomized controlled studies.

Mako™ Robotic-Arm Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique from the Office to the Operating Room.

The utilization of robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) for the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis has continued to increase. This is in part due to the consistently reproducible accuracy and precision of implant planning, intra-operative ligament balancing software, tracking optimization software, robotic-arm assisted bone preparation, excellent survivorship rates, and improvements in many patient-reported outcomes compared to manual UKA, using the Stryker Mako™ Robotic Partial Knee System (Stryker, Mako Surgical Corp., Mahwah, New Jersey). Training in the utilization of robotic-arm assistance can be time-consuming and comes with an associated learning curve even after the in-person training and coursework is complete, like most procedures. Therefore, our aim was to describe the pre-operative planning and intra-operative surgical technique for using a robotic-arm assisted partial knee system for UKA/PKA in patients who have unicompartmental medial knee osteoarthritis. Specifically, we will discuss: 1) pre-operative planning; 2) operative setup; 3) intra-operative steps; 4) execution of the plan; and 5) trialing, implantation, and final assessments.

Mid-Term Survivorship, Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

The use of robotic-arm assistance for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) has become an area of interest to overcome technical challenges, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes. Due to the rise in osteoarthritis (OA) and robotic assistance, well-powered long-term studies are warranted. The aim of this study was to analyze midterm survivorship, radiographic changes, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) of RAUKA. Patients who underwent RAUKA for medial compartmental OA were identified from April 2009 to May 2014. The query yielded 162 knees with a mean follow up of 6.5 years. Primary endpoints were to compare survivorship, final mechanical axis alignment, radiographic changes, mean ROM, and changes to the following PROMs: Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no revisions of the primary implant, one case required exchange of polyethylene bearing and debridement for deep infection, and five cases required additional surgical intervention with implant retention. Overall survivorship was 100%. Radiographic assessment demonstrated no mechanical loosening or osteolysis surrounding the implant. Mean ROM was 3 to 121.9º. Patients demonstrated a mean functional KSS of 78.55, IKDC of 78.22, and OKS of 43.94. The study supports excellent mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA. Longer term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of this technology for patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA.

LENGTH OF STAY AND DISCHARGE DISPOSITION FOLLOWING ROBOTIC ARM-ASSISTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE AND PREDICTORS OF DELAYED DISCHARGE

In-hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition following arthroplasty could act as surrogate measures for improvement in patient pathways, and have major cost saving implications for healthcare providers. With the ever-growing adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty, we wished to evaluate its impact on LOS. The objectives of this study were to compare LOS and discharge disposition following robotic-arm assisted (RO THA) versus conventional technique Total Hip Arthroplasty (CO THA).This large-scale, single institution study included patients of any age undergoing primary THA (N = 1,732) for any cause between May 2019 and January 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics, LOS, need for Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission, anaesthesia type, readmission within 30 days and discharge dispositions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also employed to identify factors and patient characteristics related to delayed discharge.The median LOS in the RO THA group was 54 hours (34, 78) versus 60 (51, 100) in the CO THA group, p&lt;0.001. Discharge disposition was comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate model, age, need for PACU admission, ASA score &gt; 2, female gender, general anaesthesia and utilisation of the conventional technique were significantly associated with LOS &gt; 2 days.Our study showed that robotic-arm assistance was associated with a shorter LOS in patients undergoing primary THA and no difference in discharge destination. Our results suggest that robotic-arm assistance could be advantageous in partly addressing the upsurge of hip arthroplasty procedures and the concomitant health care burden; however, this needs to be corroborated by long-term cost effectiveness analyses and data from randomised controlled studies.

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is an Efficient Strategy for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis with or without Robotic-Assisted System.

There is relative paucity in the literature concerning outcomes after robotic-assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA). The aims were (1) to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing PFA with inlay or onlay components, with or without robotic arm assistance and (2) to identify risk factors of poor outcomes after PFA. This retrospective study included 77 PFA for isolated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis, assigned to three groups (18 conventional technique, 17 image-free robotic-assisted system and 42 image-based robotic-assisted system). The demographic data were comparable between the three groups. The clinical outcomes assessed were: Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Society Score, Kujala score and satisfaction rate. The radiological measures were: Caton Deschamps index, patellar tilt and frontal alignment of the trochlea. Functional outcomes, satisfaction rate and residual pain were comparable between the three groups. Patellar tilt improvement was superior when a robotic device was used (either image-based or image-free) compared to the conventional technique. There were three revisions (3.9%) at the last follow-up related to femorotibial osteoarthritis progression. Multivariate analysis found no significant risk factors for poor outcomes, with respect to the surgical technique or implant design. Functional outcomes and revisions rate after PFA were comparable between the surgical techniques and implants. Robotic-assisted systems were associated with a superior improvement of the patellar tilt compared to the conventional technique.

Robotic-Arm-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Fixed-Bearing Implant.

Approximately 5% to 10% of patients with knee arthritis have isolated lateral compartment arthritis; however, lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) comprises just 1% of all knee arthroplasties1. This low proportion is partly because of the perceived complexity of lateral UKA and concerns over implant longevity and survivorship compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)2,3. With an improved understanding of knee kinematics alongside advances in implant design and tools to aid in appropriate restoration of limb alignment, lateral UKA can be an appealing surgical alternative to TKA for certain patients with lateral knee arthritis4,5. In appropriately selected patients, lateral UKA has been associated with reduced osseous and soft-tissue resection, more natural knee kinematics, less pain, shorter hospitalization, decreased blood loss and infection rates, and excellent survivorship and patient-reported outcomes6-9. This surgical approach and technique described for lateral UKA utilizes robotic-arm assistance and modern fixed-bearing implants10. The specific steps involve appropriate patient evaluation and selection, extensive radiographic and computed-tomography-based preoperative templating, a lateral parapatellar approach, intraoperative confirmation of component position and alignment, and robotic-arm assistance to perform osseous resections to achieve limb alignment and kinematic targets10. Final implants are cemented in place, and patients typically are discharged home on the day of surgery10. Nonoperative treatment for end-stage knee arthritis includes weight loss, activity modification, assistive devices, bracing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and various injections11. Alternative surgical treatments include TKA4 and, in certain patients, an offloading periarticular osteotomy12. Lateral UKA is an appealing surgical option for nonobese patients who have disabling knee pain isolated to the lateral compartment, good preoperative range of motion, and a passively correctable valgus limb deformity10,13. Patients are typically discharged home on the day of surgery, or occasionally on postoperative day 1 if medical comorbidities dictate hospital monitoring overnight10. Patients return to light activities, including walking, immediately postoperatively. By 3 months postoperatively, patients will generally have returned to all desired activities9. The mid-term outcomes of this procedure, as performed by the corresponding author, have been published recently14,15. The 5-year survivorship of 171 lateral UKAs was 97.7%, with 72.8% of patients reporting that they were very satisfied with their procedure and 19.8%, that they were satisfied14. Only 3.8% of patients reported dissatisfaction with their lateral UKA14. The mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and standard deviation were 85.6 ± 14.314. These outcomes did not differ from those observed in 802 medial UKAs, which showed a survivorship of 97.8% and KOOS of 84.3 ± 15.914. These findings are generally in line with previously published studies, which have demonstrated excellent survivorship and patient-reported outcomes with fixed-bearing lateral UKA16-19. Component position and alignment are critical to achieve target knee kinematics.Target postoperative alignment is 1° to 4° of valgus.A meticulous cementation technique is required for optimal fixation and avoidance of excess residual cement in the posterior knee. ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentAP = anteroposteriorBMI = body mass indexCT = computed tomographyCAT = computed axial tomographyIT = iliotibialKOOS JR = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint ReplacementMCL = medial collateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roomPFJ = patellofemoral jointpoly = polyethyleneROM = range of motionTKA = total knee arthroplastyUKA = unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Mid-Term Survivorship, Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

The use of robotic-arm assistance for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) has become an area of interest to overcome technical challenges, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes. Due to the rise in osteoarthritis (OA) and robotic assistance, well-powered long-term studies are warranted. The aim of this study was to analyze midterm survivorship, radiographic changes, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) of RAUKA. Patients who underwent RAUKA for medial compartmental OA were identified from April 2009 to May 2014. The query yielded 162 knees with a mean follow up of 6.5 years. Primary endpoints were to compare survivorship, final mechanical axis alignment, radiographic changes, mean ROM, and changes to the following PROMs: Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no revisions of the primary implant, one case required exchange of polyethylene bearing and debridement for deep infection, and five cases required additional surgical intervention with implant retention. Overall survivorship was 100%. Radiographic assessment demonstrated no mechanical loosening or osteolysis surrounding the implant. Mean ROM was 3 to 121.9º. Patients demonstrated a mean functional KSS of 78.55, IKDC of 78.22, and OKS of 43.94. The study supports excellent mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA. Longer term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of this technology for patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA.

Cirq® robotic assistance for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement – feasibility, accuracy, and safety

IntroductionNew technologies providing higher degree of precision, less risk for damage and less harmful exposure to radiation are necessary for correct transpedicular screw trajectory, but their efficacy should be evaluated. Research QuestionEvaluate the feasibility, accuracy and safety of Brainlab Cirq® navigated robotic arm assistance for pedicle screw placement in comparison to fluoroscopic guidance. Material and MethodsGroup I “Cirq® robotic-assisted group” – 97 screws in 21 prospectively analyzed patients. Group II “Fluoroscopy-guided group” – 98 screws in 16 consecutive patients analyzed retrospectively. Comparative evaluations included screw accuracy on Gertzbein-Robbins’s scale and fluoroscopy time. Time per screw and subjective mental workload (MWL) measured with the raw NASA task load index tool were assessed for Group I. Results195 screws were evaluated. Group I: 93 screws grade A (95.88%); 4 grade B (4.12%). In Group II, 87 screws grade A (88.78%); 9 grade B (9.18%); 1 grade C (1.02%); 1 grade D (1.02%). While the screws placed using the Cirq® system were more accurate overall, there was no statistical significance between the two groups, p=0.3714. There was no significant difference in operation length or radiation exposure between the two groups, however with the Cirq® system the radiation exposure for the surgeon was limited. Reduction in time per screw (p<0.0001) and in the MWL (p=0.0024) correlated with the surgeon’s experience with Cirq®. Discussion and ConclusionThe initial experience suggests that navigated, passive robotic arm assistance is feasible, at least as accurate as fluoroscopic guidance, and safe for pedicle screw placement.

Multi-View 3D Point Cloud Stitching Algorithm Based on Robotic Arm Assistance

Multi-View 3D Point Cloud Stitching Algorithm Based on Robotic Arm Assistance

Cirq Robotic Assistance for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: Overcoming the Disadvantages of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Various minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques have been developed with the goal of reducing approach-related soft-tissue trauma and its associated complications. However, there is still a debate on some of the potential drawbacks of MISS techniques, such as their longer operating times and increased intraoperative radiation. A solution to these disadvantages could be the implementation of new technologies, such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and surgical robotics. We compare the standard fluoroscopy MISS technique with our experience with time per screw and X-ray exposure for pedicle screw placement using the Brainlab Cirq passive robotic arm assistance coupled with the Brainlab Curve navigation system. In the Cirq robot-assisted group (Group I), 109 screws were placed in 24 prospectively analyzed patients. In the fluoroscopy-guided group, 108 screws inserted into 20 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively (Group II). The duration of surgery, the time to place one screw, the X-ray exposition, and the pedicle screw accuracy for each patient were recorded and reviewed. In total, 217 screws were analyzed. The treated levels ranged from T10 to S1. In Group I, 104 screws were grade A (95.4%) and five were grade B (4.6%). In Group II, 96 screws were grade A (88.89%); ten were grade B (9.26%); one was grade C (0.93%), and one was grade D (0.93%). While the screws placed by using the Cirq system were more accurate overall, there was no statistical significance when the two groups were compared, p=0.3724. There was no significant difference in radiation exposure between the two groups, p=0.5482; however the radiation exposure for the surgeon was very limited with the Cirq system. There was a significant reduction in the operation length (p=0.0183) and the time per screw (p<0.0001) for Group I. The CAN systems and emerging robotic platforms have the potential to diminish the main disadvantages of MISS techniques-longer operation times and X-ray exposure, at least for the surgical team.

Functional implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty and the role of robotic-arm assistance

IntroductionAccurate implant positioning, tailored to the phenotype and unique biomechanics of each patient is the single most important objective in achieving stability in THA and maximise range of motion. The spine-pelvis-hip construct functions as a single unit adapting to postural changes. It is widely accepted in the literature that no universaltarget exists and variations in spinopelvic mobility mandate adjustments to the surgical plan; thus bringing to the fore the concept of personalised, functional component positioning.MethodsThis manuscript aims to outline the challenges posed by spinopelvic imbalance and present a reproducible, stepwise approach to achieve functional-component positioning. We also present the one-year functional outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures of a prospective cohort operated with this technique.Results and ConclusionRobotic-arm assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty has facilitated enhanced planning based on the patient’s phenotype and evidence suggests it results in more reproducible and accurate implant positioning. Preservation of offset, avoiding leg-length discrepancy, accurate restoration of the centre of rotation and accomplishing the combinedversion target are very important parameters in Total Hip Arthroplasty that affect post-operative implant longevity, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study.

ObjectiveTo determine whether more precise cup positioning can be achieved with robot‐assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) as compared to conventional THA.MethodsIn this study, between July 2019 and May 2021, 93 patients aged 23–75 years with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and adult developmental dysplasia of hip who underwent first hip surgery were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the robotic‐assisted THA group (n = 45) or the conventional THA group (n = 48). After the operation, all patients were given routine rapid rehabilitation guidance. The duration of operation was recorded to estimate the learning curve through cumulative summation analysis. We compared the demographics, duration of operation, cup positioning, leg length discrepancy, hip offset, and Harris Hip Score between robot‐assisted THA and manual THA. Precision in the positioning of the acetabular prosthesis using the MAKO system was also compared between the two groups.ResultsThe mean duration of operation for the robot‐assisted THA group was 91.37 ± 17.34 min (range: 63 to 135 min), which was significantly higher than that for the conventional THA group. When the number of procedures was increased to 13, the duration of operation in the robot‐assisted group decreased significantly and gradually became stable. In terms of duration of operation, robot‐assisted THA was associated with a learning curve of 13 cases. The mean amount of bleeding in the robot‐assisted THA group was not significantly different from that in conventional THA group (328 ± 210 ml vs 315 ± 205 ml) (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference in the proportion of prostheses located within Lewinnek's safe zone between robot‐assisted THA group and conventional THA group (69.81% vs 64.41%). The leg length discrepancy (LLD) was significantly smaller in the robot‐assisted THA group than in the conventional THA group (p < 0.001), but both were within acceptable limits (10 mm). The inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular prosthesis planned before operations were correlated with the actual measurement (r = 0.857 p < 0.001, r = 0.830, p < 0.001). After surgery, none of the patients experienced hip dislocation, aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic infection during the 3 months of follow‐up.ConclusionThe proportion of acetabular prostheses in the Lewinnek's safety zone was higher and the extent of LLD was significantly lower in the robot‐assisted THA group, as compared to the same metrics in the conventional THA group. The MAKO robot improved the accuracy of implant placement in THA.

The Use of Robotic-Arm Assistance in Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Report of Three Challenging Cases

AbstractThe purpose of this case report was to demonstrate the utility, versatility, and efficacy of robotic-arm technology in complex primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases for acetabular bone loss, hip dysplasia, and post-traumatic arthritis with hardware. Preoperative computer templating allows precise and accurate acetabular and femoral stem positioning in cases that presented with significant native deformity and bone loss. Robotic-arm THA may be a viable option for complex primary cases to optimize implant positioning and mitigate postoperative instability and complications.