Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty Research Articles

V01-10 BILATERAL TESTICULAR VEIN SYNDROME MASQUERADING AS BILATERAL URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION- LESSONS LEARNT

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023V01-10 BILATERAL TESTICULAR VEIN SYNDROME MASQUERADING AS BILATERAL URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION- LESSONS LEARNT Ravimohan mavuduru, Shantanu Tyagi, Girdhar Bora, and Shrawan Singh Ravimohan mavuduru Ravimohan mavuduru More articles by this author , Shantanu TyagiShantanu Tyagi More articles by this author , Girdhar BoraGirdhar Bora More articles by this author , and Shrawan SinghShrawan Singh More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003221.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Vascular compression of ureter by aberrant lower polar vessels, retrocaval compression and ovarian vein has been described in the past. Still rarer is the ureteric obstruction with the crossing of testicular vein. We present a case of Bilateral testicular vein syndrome masquerading as Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), its intra-operative diagnosis and management. METHODS: Index patient is a 18-year-old male, presented with history of bilateral flank pain since 7 months, colicky in nature, requiring intravenous analgesics. There was no significantly contributing past history. He was evaluated elsewhere with abdominal ultrasonography which was suggestive of bilateral gross hydronephrosis. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), done during an acute episode revealed bilateral gross hydronephrosis with probable site of obstruction at UPJ. Diuretic renography in the form of DTPA Scan consolidated the findings of NCCT revealing bilateral compromised cortical function and obstruction to outflow at UPJ. With the given history and evaluation, patient was diagnosed to have Bilateral UPJO and planned for bilateral robot-assisted pyeloplasty. Intraoperatively, on the left side, at pyelotomy the ureter seemed dilated across UPJ raising questions over pre-operative diagnosis. Consequently distal patency check was undertaken to confirm the site of obstruction. After gentle distal ureteric dissection, extrinsic compression at the site of crossing left testicular vein was found to be the site of actual ureteric obstruction. To relieve this compression, the ureter was super positioned over a posteriorized gonadal vein with a subsequently successful distal patency check. Taking lessons from the left side, we started with distal ureteric dissection and surprisingly found extrinsic compression with right testicular vein on the right side as well. Site of compression was visualised as fibrosed ureteric segment which was excised and ureteroureterostomy was done super positioned over a posteriorized right gonadal vein. RESULTS: The patient had an uneventful post-operative course and bilateral double-J stents were removed at 3 weeks. Follow-up renogram at 3 months documented the resolving bilateral hydronephrosis and unobstructed drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from the given case are- Contrast-enhanced CT imaging could have suggested ureteric compression with gonadal vein pre-operatively, Distal patency check is vital when there is dilatation across PUJ, When in doubt, distal ureteric dissection is a better approach and preservation of ureteric vascularity is of paramount importance. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e82 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ravimohan mavuduru More articles by this author Shantanu Tyagi More articles by this author Girdhar Bora More articles by this author Shrawan Singh More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in renal anomalies

The surgical video demonstrates the technical nuances of performing pyeloplasties on complex renal anomalies, including duplex, horseshoe, malrotated, and ectopic kidneys. The video also highlights the anatomic relationships of the affected kidney for proper port placement and positioning during the procedure.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: How to deal with anatomic variants? A step-by-step video presentation

Pyeloplasty (open or Robot-assisted) is the gold standard of a symptomatic UPJ stenosis. Sometimes anatomic variants make the procedure challenging. This video describes a step-by-step approach in three settings: a crossing blood vessel and two different presentations of incomplete duplicated system. Under general anesthesia, patient positioned in lateral decubitus, three trocars are placed. After mobilization of the colon, the Gerota's fascia is opened, and the renal pelvis is dissected off the surrounding structures. Ureter and obstructed pyelum were subsequently identified, mobilized, and hinged on a traction stitch. The pyelum and ureter are divided and spatulated according to the Anderson-Hynes technique; anastomosis is achieved. In variants, the drainage is one of the challenging steps, needing custom-made drainage of both moieties. Correct positioning of the drainage is confirmed with reflux of methylene blue from the bladder. JJ stent was removed 6 weeks postoperatively in surgical day-clinic, additional drainage was removed 1 week after surgery in the outpatient clinic. All three children remain asymptomatic with over a year of follow-up. A step-by-step plan for pyeloplasty in case of anatomic variants is presented with a video demonstrating a robot-assisted approach in duplicated systems. Moiety drainage can be challenging.

Upper Urinary Tract Surgery Through Robotic Single-Port System vs Multiport and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: We aimed to make a general comparison between the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic platform, da Vinci® single-port (SP) system with conventional robotic multiport (MP) and laparoendoscopic single-site systems (da Vinci Xi or Si) in three upper urinary tract procedures including robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP), and robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA). Materials and Methods: After systematical searching of the literature up to October 2022 in PubMed®, Web of Science™, and the Cochrane Library and Scopus® databases, we extracted and processed the data in eligible literature for operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), morphine milligram equivalent (MME), postoperative complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results: A total of 752 patients who underwent robotic surgery for SP or MP from 11 articles were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time for either RAPN (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.30 to 0.03) or RA (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -1.08 to 0.06). However, for RAP, SP can save operation time (SMD -0.73, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.22). The introduction of SP did not increase complications to any degree, including total complication (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.53), minor complication (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.13-1.36), and major complication (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.34-2.09), nor the incidence of PSMs (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.54-1.99). It is worth noting that although the SP system increased WIT (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.62), it had the benefit of reducing intraoperative pain for RAPN with regard of MME (SMD -0.40, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.09). Conclusions: In terms of postoperative pain, SP robotic surgery is beneficial for RAPN but will make WIT prolonged. RAP is probably the most suitable upper urinary tract procedure for which SP is an option, which helps to shorten the surgery time and achieve a minimally invasive wound at the same time. Our study has been registered in PROSPERO (Registration No.: CRD42022350317).

Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review.

Background: Robot-assisted surgery demands a specific skillset of surgical knowledge, skills, and attitudes from the robotic surgeon to function as part of the robotic team and for maximal utility of the assistive surgical robot. Subsequently, the learning process of robot-assisted surgery entails new modes of learning. We sought to systematically summarize the published data on pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty (pRALP) to decipher the learning process by analyzing learning curves. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for 'learning curve' AND 'pediatric pyeloplasty'. All studies presenting outcomes of learning curves (LC) in the context of pRALP in patients < 18 years of age were included. Studies comparing LC in pRALP versus open and/or laparoscopic pyeloplasty were also included; however, those solely focusing on LC in non-robotic approaches were excluded. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle and Ottawa scale. Results: Competency was non-uniformly defined in all fifteen studies addressing learning curves in pRALP. pRALP was considered safe at all stages. Proficiency in pRALP was reached after 18 cases, while competency was estimated to demand 31 operated cases with operative duration as outcome variable. Conclusions: Pediatric RALP is safe during the learning process and 'learning by doing' improves efficiency. Competencies with broader implications than time must be defined for future studies.

Chicken RAPS: Chicken Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty Simulation. Validation Study of a Novel Chicken Model for Wet Laboratory Training in Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty

BackgroundSince the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, the number of simulation models available for teaching new surgeons has continued to increase. ObjectiveTo evaluate and validate use of a model for teaching robot-assisted pyeloplasty. Design, setting, and participantsTwenty simulated robot-assisted pyeloplasty procedures were performed by experienced (n = 4) and novice (n = 16) surgeons using a chicken crop model at two different training centers using third- and fourth-generation robotic systems. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisWe evaluated the time needed to perform the procedure, and the sufficiency and patency of the anastomosis. Participants rated the efficiency, face validity, and possible acceptance of the model as part of a structured curriculum on a scale from 0 to10. Statistical significance for comparison of results was set at p < 0.05. Results and limitationsRobot-assisted pyeloplasty was successfully performed by 75% of the participants. The completion time was significantly higher in the novice group (p = 0.016). The model was deemed to be similar to the human ureteropelvic junction by the novice group. Both groups regarded the model as a useful simulation task as part of a standardized training curriculum, with mean scores of 6.5 versus 8.69 (p = 0.046) for face validity and 8 versus 9.25 for acceptance (p = 0.053) reported by the experienced versus novice group, respectively. Limitations of the study are the costs associated with the robotic system and the unequal number of participants in the groups. ConclusionsThe chicken crop model is a low-cost and reproducible simulation model for accomplishing both the resection and reconstructive steps during the learning phase for robot-assisted pyeloplasty. Patient summaryWe assessed the use of chickens as a model for practicing a robot-assisted operation called pyeloplasty to fix narrowing of the ureter (the tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder) where it attaches to the kidney. This model can be used for simulation of robot-assisted pyeloplasty when training new robotic surgeons.

Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a commonly observed abnormality in pediatric urology. Minimally invasive approaches have gained popularity in recent years. Studies have demonstrated excellent results with both laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LAP) and robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP). Few studies have compared the experience of both procedures performed in a single institution. Our objective is to compare laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in the Puerto Rican pediatric population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using our clinic's database on patients with UPJO that were operated by the same surgeon (MPB) from 2008 to 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted of demographics, preoperative studies, perioperative data and complications of both procedures. This study was approved by our local IRB committee. A total of 86 patients that underwent pyeloplasty with at least 3 years of follow up were recorded for this study. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty were performed in 44 (51.1%) and 42 (48.8%) patients, respectively. Patient age ranged between 4 months and 17 years (LAP group - mean age of 6.19 years/RAP group - mean age of 7.07 years). Success rates was high in this series (LAP - 100% and RAP -95%). Using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann whitney sum test, significant differences between preoperative and postoperative hydronephrosis grading were observed in both LAP and RAP groups. However, no significant difference was seen regarding reduction of hydronephrosis grading when comparing both groups. No intraoperative complications were seen on either group. Both LAP and RAP are safe and effective procedures that can properly manage UPJO. Our study shows that, under experienced hands, pure laparoscopic pyeloplasty achieves comparable results to robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Pediatric urologists should be comfortable offering either of these approaches as they demonstrate high success rates in our pediatric population. Selection of LAP vs. RAP approach depends on the Surgeon's preference or experience, and on institutional availability. Minimally invasive therapies will continue to gain popularity with future advances in laparoscopic and robotic technology.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: A comparison of single-port-plus-one and multiport surgery.

This study aimed to compare the effects of various trocar placements in robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty involving children diagnosed with obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction (OUPJ). We retrospectively collected the data on 74 patients under 14 years of age who had been diagnosed with OUPJ; these patients underwent either robot-assisted or laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our hospital between January 2015 and November 2021. There were four groups, as follows: •Laparoscopic multiport pyeloplasty (LMPY),•Laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty (LSPY),•Robotic-assisted multiport pyeloplasty (RMPY),•Robotic-assisted single-port-plus-one pyeloplasty (RSPY).Patients' characteristics as well as their perioperative and follow-up data were collected and evaluated. There was no significant difference in the data regarding patients' characteristics. These data included the grade of hydronephrosis according to the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU grade), anterior and posterior diameter of the renal pelvis and ureter (APDRPU), and the differential degree of renal function (DRF) at following time points: preoperative, postoperative, and comparison of preoperative and postoperative. There was no difference among these groups. During surgery, the time of trocar placement, urethroplasty time, and total operative time in the robotic groups (RMPY and RSPY) were longer than those in the laparoscopic groups (LMPY and LSPY). However, the ratio of the urethroplasty time and full operative time (UT/WT) in the robotic groups (RMPY and RSPY) was lower than that in the laparoscopic groups (LMPY and LSPY) (P = 0.0075). Also, the volume of blood loss was lower in the robotic groups (RMPY and RSPY) than that in the laparoscopic groups (LMPY and LSPY), although there was no statistical difference (P = 0.11). There were, however, significant differences in hospitalization days (P < 0.0001) and parents' cosmetic satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). There were no differences in fasting time, the length of time that a ureteral catheter remained in place, or the number of postoperative complications. Our study shows that both robotic multiple-port and single-port-plus-one approaches are comparable, with laparoscopic multiple-port and single-port approaches equally effective in resolving OUPJ in children. Robotic and single-port-plus-one approaches may be associated with some advantages in hospitalization time and cosmetic outcomes; therefore, these approaches may be useful in urologic surgery that requires precise suturing, especially in pediatric patients.

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children

To compare the characteristics of conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in infants and young children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). We performed a retrospective study of patients (age: 0-36 months) who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) with the fourth-generation RALP or traditional LP between April 2020 and December 2020. A total of 33 patients with UPJO were enrolled: 12 underwent RALP (9 left side; 3 right side) and 21 underwent LP (18 left side; 3 right side). In the RALP group, the median patient age was 17 months (range: 5-36 months). In the LP group, the median patient age was 9 months (range: 2-36 months) (P=0.182). The mean operation times were 120.25±37.54min (RALP) and 156.10±51.11min (LP) (P=0.042), and the mean lengths of hospital stay were 6.42±1.62 days (RALP) and 8.19±2.25 days (LP) (P=0.023). Removal of the drainage tube was performed after 3.08±0.69 days (RALP) and after 4.76±1.81 days (LP) (P=0.001). The postoperative pain showed no significant difference. The mean hospitalization costs were 61464.75±2800.53 yuan (RALP) and 22169.52±3442.15 yuan (LP) (P<0.001). The mean follow-up time was 10-18 months. Significant improvements in the anteroposterior diameter and parenchymal thickness were observed after surgery. Conversion to laparotomy was not performed. No short-term complications occurred during postoperative hospitalization and follow-up. RALP has the advantages of less trauma and faster recovery. It can be safely and effectively performed in infants and young children, and its effectiveness is similar to that of traditional LP.

Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Adults-A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Laparoscopic (LP) and robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) are minimally invasive techniques for correcting uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of all adults who underwent RAP (n = 41) to those who underwent LP (n = 24) for UPJO at our institution between 2003–2022. Methods: Age, sex, body mass index, surgical side, past abdominal/endoscopic surgeries, pre- and postoperative renal scans, pre- and postoperative serum creatinine levels, operative time (OT), presence of crossing vessels, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, time to JJ stent removal, follow-up length, and postoperative hydronephrosis were analyzed. Results: The groups were demographically comparable. The mean total and skin-to-skin OTs (minutes) were significantly longer in the RAP group than in the LP group (242.4 ± 55 vs. 161.4 ± 40 p < 0.001; 163.7 ± 41.8 vs. 124.3 ± 30.3 p = 0.006, respectively). Hospital stay (days) was shorter in the RAP group (3.3 ± 2.1 vs. 7.3 ± 2.5 p < 0.001). Postoperative complication rates were identical for both groups. The LP group had a significantly longer follow-up period (85.2 ± 73 vs. 19 ± 14 months p < 0.001). The success rates for the LP and RAP groups were 87.5% and 90.6% (p = 0.708). Conclusions: RAP achieves equivalent results to LP, in adult patients. A longer OT may be expected with the robotic system since it can handle more complicated cases.

Pyeloplasty with the Kangduo Surgical Robot vs the da Vinci Si Robotic System: Preliminary Results.

Objective: To share our experience in robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) with the Kangduo (KD) surgical robot vs the da Vinci Si (DV) robotic system (KD-RAP vs DV-RAP, respectively). Methods: From August 2019 to February 2021, 16 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) underwent KD-RAP and other 16 patients with UPJO accepted DV-RAP. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The perioperative results and follow-up data were prospectively collected and compared. Results: There was no conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the KD-RAP group than the DV-RAP group (141 ± 28 minutes vs 118 ± 31 minutes, respectively, p = 0.04). The time per stitch was significantly longer in the KD-RAP group than the DV-RAP group (1.7 ± 0.5 minutes vs 1.4 ± 0.3 minutes, respectively, p = 0.05). No significant difference was noted in the estimated blood loss and the postoperative length of hospitalization. At a median follow-up of 19 (range 17-21) and 19.5 (range 14-33) months for the KD-RAP and DV-RAP groups, respectively, no difference was noted in the success rates between the KD-RAP and DV-RAP groups (93.75% and 100%, respectively; p = 0.31). Complications were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.54). One (6.3%) patient developed urinary infection, which responded well to oral antibiotics in KD-RAP group and 2 (12.5%) patients suffered from irritation symptoms of bladder, which improved after removal of Double-J stent in the DV-RAP group. Conclusions: The RAP with the use of the KD system was feasible, safe, and effective. The DV-RAP group showed advantage in the operation time and the time per stitch.

A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency

The transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted procedures leads to potential increase in operative times and health care costs. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis can objectively study the learning curve to detect significant changes in operative timing and monitor complication rates. The objective of this study is to investigate the total and step-specific times for pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) to investigate the learning curve of a single surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to RAP. This prospective cohort study included 50 consecutive RAP procedures performed since the inception of our robotic program from June 2013 to January 2019. The CUSUM of RAP total operative time (OT) was calculated to determine the breakpoints between learning phases using piecewise linear regression. Cumulative-observed-minus-expected failure chart with 80% and 95% reassurance boundary lines was constructed using 5% acceptable and 10% unacceptable complication rates. Step-specific operative times were prospectively recorded by an independent observer for port placement, dissection and hitch stitch placement, pelvis dismemberment and spatulation, suturing and port removal. Piecewise linear regression for OT identified breakpoints at case 13 and 29 suggesting transition at these points between Learning to Proficiency, and Proficiency to Competency. The overall mean OT was 142.2±46.0min. There was a significant difference in the mean OT between Learning (203.9±35.3min, the initial 13 cases), Proficiency (159.2±18.6min, the middle 16 cases), and Competency (126.6±19.7min, the last 21 cases) phases (p<0.001). The complication rate for RAP stabilized around the acceptable level of 5% up to case 41 before finalizing at 8% overall. The step-specific analysis suggested that suturing entered the Competency phase at case 27, with a 50% decrease in suturing time from Learning to Proficiency and Competency. Our study suggests that by case 30 a surgeon transitioning to RAP can achieve a significant decrease in OT. Complication rates remained within acceptable limits throughout, indicating that RAP can be safely adopted, even in low volume RAP centres. Suturing competency seems to be a significant advantage of the robotic platform as suggested by early significant decrease in suturing times noted between the Learning and Proficiency phases. Future studies can confirm these findings and establish reference operative times to aid surgeons and trainees transitioning from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAP. Moreover, total OT decreases significantly and relatively soon after transition to RAP.

Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Retrograde stent with external string for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: does it reduce cost and complications?

Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) is a mainstay in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. At our institution, to limit planned operating rooms visits we have placed a ureteral stent with an external string (SWES) immediately prior to RAP. In this study, we sought to quantify the operative time, complications, and costs associated with this approach compared to the traditional approach, requiring subsequent stent removal in the operating room. We hypothesized the SWES cohort would have decreased cost, yet with similar operative time and complications. We retrospectively collected all RAPs performed at our institution using the SWES approach (Aug 2012-July 2017). We excluded those with a redo pyeloplasty, and/or a percutaneous nephrostomy tube for post-operative drainage. We collected 30-day costs linked to the patients' MRN using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. We compared 30-day healthare costs for all patients following RAP. We compared our SWES group to a national cohort of all pediatric RAP during the same time period. Lastly, we sent an anonymous, electronic survey to urologists of all PHIS institutions to identify the predominant postoperative drainage, nationally. Within our institution, we reviewed all those treated with SWES (n = 85) (Table 1). The median 30-day cost was $10,548 among those with SWES (Table 2). This was significantly less than the overall, national cohort of all pediatric RAP during the same period ($14,119, p < 0.001). There was a 15.5 % rate of unplanned return to the hospital in the SWES group. Of those unplanned returns, 8.2 % (7/85) had unplanned return for a procedure (3 for unplanned stent removal, 2 for nephrostomy tube for persistent obstruction, 1 for omental hernia, and 1 for stent replacement). With a 42.5 % (37/87) response rate, our nationwide survey found 84.6 % primarily leave stents WITHOUT a string, 7.7 % left nephrostomy tubes, and 7.7 % stents with strings. During pediatric RAP, placement of a SWES takes little time, carries a risk of unplanned visit to the operating room, saves the patient a certain, second anesthetic for stent removal, and amounts to a cost savings of approximately 25 %.

Comparison of Secondary and Primary Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of secondary minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) versus primary MIP for the patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Materials and Methods: We searched all the literature of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library comparing secondary MIP and primary MIP and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: We included 15 studies involving 1637 patients with 1371 in the primary MIP group and 266 in the secondary MIP group. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stays, and the risk of hematuria, urinary tract infection, intestinal obstruction, stent complications, and overall complications (P > .05). Comparing with the secondary MIP group, the primary MIP group has shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] = -36.91 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -50.21 to -23.62, P < .00001), less estimated blood loss (MD = -16.70 mL, 95% CI: -31.60 to -1.80, P = .03), lower risk of urinary leakage and injury of blood vessel (relative risk [RR] = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.93, P = .04) (RR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.61, P = .01), and higher success rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = .003). The robot-assisted pyeloplasty is superior to the laparoscopic pyeloplasty in controlling the amount of blood loss in the secondary operation. Conclusions: Considering the poorer outcomes of secondary surgery, we believe that special attention should be paid to not missing crossing vessels, and it would be more prudent to perform a more definitive procedure with pyeloplasty instead of endopyelotomy for primary UPJO.

Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty for Congenital Uretero Pelvic Junction Obstruction

Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty for Congenital Uretero Pelvic Junction Obstruction

Comparison of Cosmetic Results in Children >10 Years Old Undergoing Open, Laparoscopic or Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Multicentric Study.

Our goal was to compare surgical scars assessed by a validated patient reported outcome questionnaire in children undergoing open (OP), laparoscopic (LP), or robotic-assisted (RALP) pyeloplasty. Our secondary aim was to assess the influence on the outcomes of variables such as gender or body mass index (BMI). We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicentric study of patients undergoing primary pyeloplasty between age 10 and 18 years at 5 tertiary Italian institutions during the period January 2010 to December 2019. Of 227 eligible patients 114 (50%) participated. OP was performed in 37 (32%), LP in 30 (26%) and RALP in 47 (41%), After a median (IQR) followup of 5.2 (2.3-7.8) years, scars were measured and assessed by a validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Scores were compared among techniques and in accordance with several variables. The median length of the surgical scar at followup was significantly larger (p <0.0001) after OP (8.1 cm vs 1.8 cm for LP and 2.0 cm for RALP), where scar length correlated with BMI (p=0.04). Ninety patients (79%) had a Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire score within the first quartile, the most favorable. During followup, 43 (38%) participants reported scar-related symptom. Symptoms were generally more common after OP (54% vs 30% for LP and 30% for RALP, p=0.06) and scar hyperesthesia was significantly more frequent after OP (p=0.01). Perception of the cosmetic outcomes in pre-adolescents and adolescents after pyeloplasty was generally good. LP achieved the best cosmetic results. OP was more commonly associated with scar-related symptoms and the size of the incision paralleled BMI.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of an extended recurrent ureteropelvic junction stricture

A clinical case of robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft of an extended recurrent stricture of the left ureteropelvic junction is presented. The patient had previously undergone left-sided laparoscopic antevasal pyeloplasty and retrograde endopyelotomies with ureteral stenting. However, after these interventions, the dilatation of the left pelvicalyceal system persisted, the patient complained of lumbar pain and periodic exacerbations of chronic pyelonephritis. Transperitoneal robotic access isolated the ureteral upper third and the ureteropelvic junction from scar tissue, after dissecting the narrowed ureteral section, its length was about 3.0 cm. In this regard, plastic surgery was performed with a buccal mucosa graft, the ureter was drained with a stent. There were no postoperative complications, and on day 3 the patient was discharged. The stent was removed 4 weeks after. During the control ultrasound examination, the renal pelvicalyceal system was relatively reduced, and the patient did not notice any pain.

Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is one of the common causes of hydronephrosis in children, and the purpose of this study was to observe the application effect of da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic treatment of UPJO and to investigate the safety, feasibility, and advantages of da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. 13 patients who underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) for UPJO admitted from May 2020 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in our study. The clinical data among them revealed the intraoperative and postoperative indicators and complications as follows. UPJO was found on the left side in 9 patients and on the right side in 4 patients. The average operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 227.3 (175–310) min, 9.2 (5–30) mL, and 9.2 (6–14) days, respectively. Two cases of gross hematuria and two cases of minor urinary tract infection occurred after surgery, and the rest had no perioperative complications. The clinical treatment efficiency at postoperative follow-up was 100%. Our initial analysis showed that da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a highly effective and safe option for the treatment of UPJO in children.

Treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and urolithiasis in children with minimally invasive surgery.

Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) is the most common congenital ureteral anomaly. Nowadays, according to the increasing incidence of urolithiasis, 20% of children with UPJO presents urolithiasis. Open pyeloplasty was the standard treatment before the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Nevertheless, only scattered experiences on MIS were previously described and universal agreement on the treatment of UPJO plus urolithiasis is still missing. The study aim was to describe our experience with a series of pediatric patients affected by UPJO and urolithiasis treated with robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) and endoscopic removal of stones using a flexible cystoscope and a stones basket in a singular tertiary referral center. We retrospectively reviewed our data from pediatric patients affected by UPJO and urolithiasis undergoing RAP between April 2013 and December 2019. The analysis was conducted on seven patients. All procedures were performed by one expert robotic surgeon and one endoscopic surgeon skilled in the management of urolithiasis. The mean age was 7 years (IQR 4-16). The median stone area was 77.7 mm two (IQR 50.2-148.4). Most of them (71.4%) presented preoperative symptoms. The median operative time was 110 min (IQR 104-125) with a console time of 90 (IQR 90-105). The median length of stay was 5 days (IQR 4-5). Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 10-25). RAP with concomitant flexible ureteroscope is a safe and effective option for the simultaneous management of UPJO with urolithiasis with excellent outcomes in children.