A large body of intra-RNA and RNA-protein crosslinking data, obtained in this laboratory, was used to fold the phylogenetically and experimentally established secondary structure of Escherichia coli 16 S RNA into a three-dimensional model. All the crosslinks were induced in intact 30 S subunits (or in some cases in growing E. coli cells), and the sites of crosslinking were precisely localized on the RNA by oligonucleotide analysis. The RNA-protein crosslinking data (including 28 sites, and involving 13 of the 21 30 S ribosomal proteins) were used to relate the RNA structure to the distribution of the proteins as determined by neutron scattering. The three-dimensional model of the 16 S RNA has overall dimensions of 220 Å × 140 Å × 90 Å, in good agreement with electron microscopic estimates for the 30 S subunit. The shape of the model is also recognizably the same as that seen in electron micrographs, and the positions in the model of bases localized on the 30 S subunit by immunoelectron microscopy (the 5′ and 3′ termini, the m 7G and m 6 2 A residues, and C-1400) correspond closely to their experimentally observed positions. The distances between the RNA-protein crosslink sites in the model correlate well with the distances between protein centres of mass obtained by neutron scattering, only two out of 66 distances falling outside the expected tolerance limits. These two distances both involve protein S13, a protein noted for its anomalous behaviour. A comparison with other experimental information not specifically used in deriving the model shows that it fits well with published data on RNA-protein binding sites, mutation sites on the RNA causing resistance to antibiotics, tertiary interactions in the RNA, and a potential secondary structural “switch”. Of the sites on 16 S RNA that have been found to be accessible to chemical modification in the 30 S subunit, 87% are at obviously exposed positions in the model. In contrast, 70% of the sites corresponding to positions that have ribose 2′- O-methylations in the eukaryotic 18 S RNA from Xenopus laevis are at non-exposed (i.e. internal) positions in the model. All nine of the modified bases in the E. coli 16 S RNA itself show a remarkable distribution, in that they form a “necklace” in one plane around the “throat” of the subunit. Insertions in eukaryotic 18 S RNA, and corresponding deletions in chloroplast or mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal RNA relative to E. coli 16 S RNA represent distinct sub-domains in the structure. Some, but by no means all, of the RNA helices that have been proposed to be co-axial in the 16 S RNA can be brought into co-axial positions. Crosslinking data from other authors, in particular intra-RNA crosslinks formed using isolated 16 S RNA as the substrate for crosslinking are, in general, not compatible with our model.