Rivaroxaban Treatment Research Articles

Fatal adverse events of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin: an analysis using data from VigiBase

PurposeThe aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of fatal adverse events (AEs) of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin and to underline the importance of the rational use of drugs.MethodsThe WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products (VigiBase) was searched for fatal AEs in the combined use of rivaroxaban and aspirin, and the clinical characteristics of those cases with sufficient information (vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80) were analyzed.ResultsBy January 19, 2020, 2309 fatal adverse event reports of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin from 21 countries were entered in VigiBase. One hundred and twenty cases contained further information, of which 42 were female (35%) and 78 were male (65%). The median age was 75 (range 34 to 93) years, and 109 cases (91%) were elderly patients (≥ 65 years). The AEs listed in the fatal case reports included bleeding in 114 cases (mainly intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 59 and 46 respectively, accounting for 88%) and ischemic events in six cases (ischemic stroke in three, acute myocardial infarction in two, myocardial infarction combined with acute liver failure in one). Among the patients with bleeding events, 108 (95%) had existing risk factors for bleeding or for interacting with aspirin or rivaroxaban. These may be divided into the following: diseases (hypertension, renal impairment, history of stroke, peptic ulcer, or previous bleeding), drugs (high dose aspirin, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, P-gp inhibitors/CYP3A4 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), or other factors (e.g., elderly, low body weight, or excessive intake of ginger, fish oil, or alcohol). There were 45 cases with two or more of these risk factors in addition to rivaroxaban and aspirin. Patients with ischemic events are often in very high-risk groups of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or self-discontinuation of treated drugs. Medication errors occurred in 24 patients (20%): excessive treatment in 17 cases, contraindication in three, frequency error in two, excessive treatment combined with contraindication in one, and self-discontinuation in one.ConclusionsFatal AEs related to rivaroxaban combined with aspirin, including bleeding and ischemic events, have been reported mostly in the elderly, and sometimes involved medication errors. The fatal AEs mainly manifested as serious bleeding, and most of them occurred in patients with concurrent multiple risk factors. Monitoring coagulation during rivaroxaban treatment is recommended in very high-risk ASCVD populations, and attention should be paid to prevention of medication errors.

Favorable effect of rivaroxaban against vascular dysfunction in diabetic mice by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in various complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Bayer), an oral direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, prevents the activation of the coagulation cascade in CVD. Considering its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects, we assessed the hypothesis that rivaroxaban treatment may attenuate the vascular lesion and dysfunction in T2DM mice.C57BL/6, BKS-db/db, BKS-db/+, wild-type (WT), and NLRP3-/- mice were fed with standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD). Biochemical indexes, vascular lesions, and protein expression were evaluated using Western blot analysis, immunofluorescent staining, and RNA interference. Rivaroxaban presented favorable protection of vascular dysfunction in T2DM mice with significantly relieved vascular tension, intima-media thickness, and collagen deposition. Similar improvements in NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) knockout groups and rivaroxaban pointed to the positive role of rivaroxaban against vascular dysfunction in diabetic mice by ameliorating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Furthermore, the augmentation of inflammation and cell dysfunction in mice aortic endothelial cells (MAECs) and smooth muscle cells (MOVASs) induced by soluble FXa may be blocked by rivaroxaban via protease-activated receptors (PAR-1, PAR-2), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and nuclear factor κ-B (NF-κB) pathway.The data indicate that the development of vascular dysfunction and inflammation in T2DM mice may be blocked by rivaroxaban in vivo and in vitro. Rivaroxaban treatment may also attenuate NLRP3 inflammasome activation via PARs, MAPK, and NF-κB pathway. This study provides mechanistic evidence of rivaroxaban therapies for vascular complications of T2DM.

XaMINA: A Real-World, Prospective, Observational Study of Treatment-Naïve Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation in Asia.

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism have been demonstrated in Asian and non-Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in multiple studies. However, limited published data exist on its use specifically in treatment-naïve patients from the Asia region. Patients in South Korea and Taiwan can now receive rivaroxaban as first-line therapy, allowing for data generation in this patient group. XaMINA was a prospective, real-world, multicenter, single-arm, observational cohort study of patients with NVAF in South Korea and Taiwan naïve to anticoagulation and initiating rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, symptomatic thromboembolic events, and treatment persistence. In total, 1094 patients were included and the follow-up was 1year. The baseline mean CHADS2 score was 1.63±0.98, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.92±1.42, and mean HAS-BLED score was 1.00±0.75. The primary outcome occurred in 20 (1.8%) patients [incidence rate 2.1 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI 1.35-3.25)]. Thromboembolic events occurred in 9 (0.8%) patients, of whom 5 (0.5%) had stroke, 3 (0.3%) myocardial infarction, and 1 (0.1%) a transient ischemic attack. There were no cases of non-central nervous system systemic embolism, and 735 (67.2%) patients persisted with rivaroxaban treatment for 1year. XaMINA demonstrated low incidence rates of major bleeding events and thromboembolic events in patients with NVAF newly initiating rivaroxaban in South Korea and Taiwan, consistent with previous real-world studies reconfirming the results of the ROCKET AF study. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03284762) on 15 September 2017.

Differential Inhibition of Platelet Reactivity by Dual Therapy With Aspirin and Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Pilot Study.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) benefit from combination therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 100 mg, one time per day) plus low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg, two times per day) compared to ASA monotherapy. In particular, major adverse cardiac and limb events were significantly reduced after peripheral endovascular revascularization (EVR). In this pilot study, the platelet activation status in vivo and platelet reactivity in vitro were longitudinally analyzed by flow cytometric assays and calibrated automated thrombography in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from 10 patients with PAD receiving ASA (100 mg, one time per day) before EVR, ASA plus clopidogrel (75 mg, one time per day) after EVR, and ASA plus rivaroxaban (2.5 mg, two times per day) during a long-term follow-up. Platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel was compared to additional 10 patients with stable PAD and clopidogrel (75 mg, one time per day) monotherapy. ASA plus rivaroxaban treatment resulted in a significantly decreased thrombin peak in PRP for two triggers, namely, low concentration of tissue factor (TF) and thrombin, compared to ASA monotherapy. TF-controlled thrombin generation was additionally characterized by a significantly prolonged lag time in PRP and platelet-free plasma during ASA plus rivaroxaban combination therapy. In comparison, ASA plus clopidogrel treatment presented a significant reduction of the thrombin peak in PRP, which was less pronounced than during subsequent ASA plus rivaroxaban therapy. Platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel was observed for 60% of patients receiving ASA plus clopidogrel and clopidogrel monotherapy, respectively. Blocking of CD36 on the platelet surface further reduced the thrombin peak in PRP induced by TF for all three therapy regimes. Platelet activation in vivo and in response to the GPVI-agonist convulxin or thrombin in vitro was similar, whereas integrin αIIbβ3 activation and α-granule release induced by the PAR-1 activating peptide TRAP-6 were significantly diminished during ASA plus rivaroxaban treatment compared to ASA monotherapy. In conclusion, the data of this pilot study indicate an inhibitory effect of rivaroxaban on the thrombin propagation phase of CD36-sensitive platelet thrombin formation in patients with PAD treated with ASA plus rivaroxaban combination therapy, which is associated with decreased PAR-1 but not thrombin-mediated platelet activation.

Modern issues of improving the prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke

The anticoagulant therapy with a priority of direct oral anticoagulants is an approach to the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that has presently proved its efficacy and is stated in international clinical guidelines. An extensive evidence-based database demonstrates advantages of rivaroxaban over other drugs of this class in secondary prevention of stroke in AF. Furthermore, these advantages are combined with the optimal safety profile. The rivaroxaban treatment may provide the most favorable prognosis due to the prevention of recurrent stroke in AF, reducing the rate of kidney disease progression, and slowing vascular atherosclerosis. An important beneficial feature of rivaroxaban is once-a-day intake, which is important in the context of a high incidence of cognitive disorders in this patient category, and may improve their compliance and, thus, help achieving the expected profile of treatment efficacy. Thus, rivaroxaban can be regarded as a drug of choice for secondary prevention of stroke in AF.

Outcomes after Rivaroxaban Treatment of Extensive Deep Vein Thrombosis

Regression of thrombus in response to treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic efficacy of rivaroxaban in the treatment of extensive DVT. We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients treated with rivaroxaban among 728 new DVT patients, at our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021. Extensive DVT was defined as thrombus connecting to 2 or more segments of the inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vein, femoral vein, or popliteal vein. Localized DVT was defined as a thrombus confined to 1 segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vein, femoral vein, or popliteal vein. We compared the changes in thrombus between the extensive DVT group (36 patients) and the localized DVT group (40 patients). In the localized DVT group, 14 (37%) had total recanalization within 3weeks after DOAC initiation, and 30 (79%) had total recanalization within 3months. In the extensive DVT group, only 3 (9%) had total recanalization within 3weeks after starting DOAC, and even after 3months, only 5 (15%) had total recanalization. Symptoms (P=0.01) and extensive DVT (P<0.01) were significantly associated with the risk for failure of total recanalization. Rivaroxaban was highly effective for total recanalization of localized DVT but not for symptomatic or extensive DVT. In patients with symptomatic extensive DVT, catheter-based thrombolysis may be considered in selected cases.

Protective Effect of Rivaroxaban Against Amyloid Pathology and Neuroinflammation Through Inhibiting PAR-1 and PAR-2 in Alzheimer's Disease Mice.

Recent studies have revealed that atrial fibrillation (AF) patients have a high risk of developing cognitive impairment, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Some reports suggest that the application of oral anticoagulant with an appropriate dose may have a preventive effect on AD. However, which oral anticoagulant drug is more appropriate for preventing AD and the underlying mechanism(s) is still unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the treatment effect of rivaroxaban administration as well as investigate the roles of PAR-1 and PAR-2 in the AD + CAA mice model. In the present study, we compared a traditional oral anticoagulant, warfarin, and a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), rivaroxaban, via long-term administration to an AD with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) mice model. Rivaroxaban treatment attenuated neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, memory deficits, and amyloid-β deposition through PAR-1/PAR-2 inhibition in the AD + CAA mice model compared with warfarin and no-treatment groups. The present study demonstrates that rivaroxaban can attenuate AD progress and can be a potential choice to prevent AD.

Association of Rivaroxaban vs Apixaban With Major Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

The comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban, the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulants for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain. To compare major ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban. Retrospective cohort study using computerized enrollment and claims files for US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older. Between January 1, 2013, and November 30, 2018, a total of 581 451 patients with atrial fibrillation began rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment and were followed up for 4 years, through November 30, 2018. Rivaroxaban (n = 227 572) and apixaban (n = 353 879), either standard or reduced dose. The primary outcome was a composite of major ischemic (stroke/systemic embolism) and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage/other intracranial bleeding/fatal extracranial bleeding) events. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal extracranial bleeding and total mortality (fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic event or other death during follow-up). Rates, hazard ratios (HRs), and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for baseline differences in comorbidity with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Study patients (mean age, 77.0 years; 291 966 [50.2%] women; 134 393 [23.1%] receiving reduced dose) had 474 605 person-years of follow-up (median [IQR] of 174 [62-397] days). The adjusted primary outcome rate for rivaroxaban was 16.1 per 1000 person-years vs 13.4 per 1000 person-years for apixaban (RD, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.24]). The rivaroxaban group had increased risk for both major ischemic events (8.6 vs 7.6 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-1.7]; HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20]) and hemorrhagic events (7.5 vs 5.9 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.1]; HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.36]), including fatal extracranial bleeding (1.4 vs 1.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.18-1.70]). Patients receiving rivaroxaban had increased risk of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (39.7 vs 18.5 per 1000 person-years; RD, 21.1 [95% CI, 20.0-22.3]; HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.99-2.15]), fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic events (4.5 vs 3.3 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.6]; HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.21-1.48]), and total mortality (44.2 vs 41.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.8-4.5]; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]). The risk of the primary outcome was increased for rivaroxaban in both those receiving the reduced dose (27.4 vs 21.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 6.4 [95% CI, 4.1-8.7]; HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.16-1.40]) and the standard dose (13.2 vs 11.4 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-2.6]; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]) groups. Among Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation, treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban was associated with a significantly increased risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

Cancer‐Associated ThrOmboSIs – Patient‐Reported OutcoMes With RivarOxaban (COSIMO) – Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes

BackgroundPatients with cancer‐associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolic events, which contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants may provide a convenient treatment option for these patients. ObjectivesTo assess clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with active cancer changing to rivaroxaban after ≥4 weeks of standard therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in clinical practice. This analysis focused on secondary outcomes of Cancer‐associated thrOmboSIs – Patient‐reported outcoMes with rivarOxaban (COSIMO). PatientsCOSIMO was a multinational, prospective, noninterventional, single‐arm cohort study. Overall, 505 patients received at least one dose of rivaroxaban; 96.6% changing from low‐molecular‐weight heparin, 1.6% from a vitamin K antagonist, and 1.8% from fondaparinux. ResultsMost patients had solid tumors (n = 449; 88.9%) and approximately half of these patients had metastases. The qualifying venous thromboembolic event was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 45.3% of patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) in 37.2% of patients, DVT with PE in 9.7% of patients, and catheter‐associated DVT in 7.5% of patients. Approximately 75.1% of patients received rivaroxaban for at least 3 months; 150 (29.7%) patients received concomitant chemotherapy during the study. VTE recurrence, major bleeding, nonmajor bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 18 (3.6%), 18 (3.6%), 81 (16.0%), and 12 (2.4%) patients, respectively. ConclusionsIn patients with CAT who changed to rivaroxaban treatment after ≥4 weeks of standard therapy, the observed incidence proportions of recurrent VTE and bleeding events were in keeping with the recognized effectiveness and safety profile of rivaroxaban for the treatment of CAT.

Long-term VTE treatment with rivaroxaban: Results from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY

Data on long-term effectiveness and safety of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment with rivaroxaban are scarce and not available from randomized clinical trials. To supplement the positive results of phase III VTE treatment trials with rivaroxaban, we used data from the ongoing, prospective, non-interventional DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY to evaluate long-term management patterns and clinical outcomes.Between December 1st 2011 and September 30th 2020, 812 patients with acute VTE (575 DVT; 237 PE) and rivaroxaban treatment were prospectively followed. During treatment (median rivaroxaban exposure 1.1 years IQR 0.3–5.0 years; median follow-up 6.1 years IQR 4.7–7.8 years) rates of recurrent VTE and ISTH major bleeding were 0.7/100 pt. years (95% CI 0.4–1.1) and 2.1/100 pt. years; 95% CI 1.5–2.8, respectively. Of the 427 patients still taking rivaroxaban at 12 months, 276 and 202 were still taking rivaroxaban at 3 and 5 years, respectively. “Scheduled end of treatment” was the leading discontinuation reason also beyond 12 months. When exposure days were divided by the number of major clinical outcomes (recurrent VTE + other major cardiovascular + ISTH major bleeding), continued rivaroxaban treatment had the longest “exposure per event” period (6398 days/event) compared to patients switching to alternative treatments (4658 days/event) or stopping anticoagulation completely (4337 days/event).Our results confirm low thrombotic and major bleeding rates for long-term VTE treatment with rivaroxaban. Beyond 12 months, scheduled treatment discontinuations still occur. Although 3–5% of patients planned for indefinite rivaroxaban therapy switched to other anticoagulants each year, the overall persistence to rivaroxaban was high.

Abstract 10233: Interruption of Perirenal Adipose Tissue Thromboinflammation Reverses Prediabetic Kidney Impairment

Introduction: Mounting evidence suggests that micro- and macrovascular complications typically seen in diabetic patients commence in prediabetes. In absence of protracted hyperglycemia and its downstream pathological pathways, alternative mechanisms contribute to the observed cardiorenal involvement. Recent work from our laboratory implicated localized adipose inflammation in the detrimental phenotype in early metabolic deterioration, where inflammatory changes in perirenal adipose tissue triggered kidney functional and vascular deterioration. Significantly, thromboinflammatory processes involving increased factor Xa activity contribute to the low-grade adipose tissue inflammation resulting in vascular remodeling, vascular injury, atherosclerosis and organ damage, acting in a positive feedback loop further exacerbating tissue damage. Hypothesis: As such, we hypothesize factor Xa inhibition in a non-obese prediabetic rat model of localized perirenal adipose inflammation will mitigate the functional and renovascular derangements associated with metabolic dysfunction. Methods: Our rat model is induced by twelve weeks of high-caloric diet feeding to evoke a non-obese normoglycemic prediabetic phenotype. Prediabetic rats received daily oral rivaroxaban (20 mg/Kg) for the last two weeks of feeding. Renal function was assessed by measuring urinary protein excretion and glomerular filtration rate. Renovascular reactivity was examined in isolated perfused kidney preparations. Markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and structural damage were studied in perirenal adipose and renal cortices. Results: High-calorie diet induced local adipose tissue inflammation and subsequent renovascular deterioration evident by an impaired renovasular endothelial feedback. This was associated with augmented oxidative stress and interstitial fibrosis. Rivaroxaban treatment decreased markers of perirenal adipose inflammation, oxidative stress and improved kidney structure and function. Conclusion: Our results highlight a pleotropic effect of the factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, in decreasing perirenal adipose tissue inflammation and subsequent amelioration of the deteriorated kidney function in prediabetes.

Rivaroxaban Suppresses Atherosclerosis by Inhibiting FXa-Induced Macrophage M1 Polarization-Mediated Phenotypic Conversion of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells.

Background: Factor Xa (FXa) is a mediator initiating and accelerating atherosclerosis (AS). Both macrophage and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) participate in AS progression. This study was aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying the effects of the FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban on AS.Methods: Rivaroxaban was administered to AS mice. Primary macrophages were exposed to FXa, treated with rivaroxaban, and transfected with siRNA silencing protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), delta-like receptor 4 (Dll4), and Akt. Interaction between macrophages and VSMCs was assessed by co-culturing systems. Atherosclerotic lesions were evaluated by oil red O stain. Fluorescent staining was used to determine the cell phenotypes. Secretions of inflammatory cytokines and collagen were assessed by ELISA and Sircol assays. Western blotting was used to evaluate the protein expression and phosphorylation levels.Results: Rivaroxaban reduced lesion area, accumulation of M1 macrophages, and contractile-synthetic phenotypic conversion of VSMCs in atherosclerotic plaques. FXa exposure induced polarization of macrophages toward M1 and Dll4 high expression, which were inhibited by PAR2, Akt1, and HIF1α silencing. Rivaroxaban treatment inhibited PAR2/Akt/HIF1α signaling activation and Dll4 expression in FXa-exposed macrophages. By cell-to-cell contact, M1 macrophages induced Notch signaling activation in VSMCs which committed contractile-synthetic conversion. Rivaroxaban treatment and Dll4 silencing incapacitated macrophage in inducing phenotypic conversion of VSMCs upon cell-to-cell contact.Conclusion: Rivaroxaban suppresses AS by inhibiting FXa-induced PAR2/Akt/HIF1α signaling activation-mediated macrophage M1 polarization and high Dll4 expression. These macrophages facilitated VSMCs to perform contractile-synthetic phenotypic conversion upon macrophage-VSMCs cell-to-cell contact.

Cost-effectiveness of anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in mainland China.

With the high cost, the long-term persistence of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was lower than that of warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for a long time. The prices of NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) decreased significantly over the past year in mainland China. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NOACs versus warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. A decision tree and Markov model were used to assess the treatment strategies of four NOACs versus warfarin over a lifetime horizon. For each treatment strategy, the total lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. The impact of parameter uncertainties on base-case analysis results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. In the base-case analysis, compared with warfarin, apixaban had a decreased total lifetime cost of USD 389 and rivaroxaban of USD 1482, while low-dose dabigatran had an increased total lifetime cost of USD 925 and high-dose dabigatran of USD 6641, with QALY increasing by 0.53, 1.32, 0.92 and 1.83, respectively. The ICER of low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin was USD 1005 per QALY gain, while those of apixaban (-USD 734 per QALY gain) and rivaroxaban (-USD 1123 per QALY gain) were negative. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the base-case results were robust by applying certain varying parameters to the model. These four NOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, low-dose dabigatran and high-dose dabigatran) treatment strategies were cost-effective compared with warfarin and recommended as substitutes for warfarin treatment for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF in the healthcare system of China, which might be driven by large drug price reductions in the past year.

A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 94 Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cerebral Glioma to Compare Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis with and without Rivaroxaban.

BackgroundVenous thrombosis (VTE) is a common adverse event among inpatients, which can cause pulmonary embolism, and greatly increases mortality. The effects of rivaroxaban in patients undergoing brain glioma surgery have still not been explored. This single-center study of 94 patients undergoing surgery for cerebral glioma aimed to compare postoperative thromboprophylaxis with and without rivaroxaban.Material/MethodsWe designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban on 94 patients undergoing brain glioma surgery. These patients were divided into a rivaroxaban group (administered at 10 mg per day from admission to discharge) and a placebo group. The primary study endpoint was incidence of VTE at discharge. The secondary endpoints included safety outcomes of major bleeding, allergy, or VTE-related death.ResultsA total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study: 47 in the rivaroxaban group and 47 in the placebo group. Baseline characteristics of participants were well-matched in both groups. A significant reduction was found in the incidence of VTE in the rivaroxaban treatment group versus the placebo group (1/47 vs 10/47 patients, P=0.008). The rate of major bleeding events was quite low in both group (1/47 vs 1/47 patients). One patient in the placebo group died due to a pulmonary embolism and intractable concomitant underlying diseases.ConclusionsOur results indicate that treatment with rivaroxaban is a safe and effective thromboprophylaxis treatment in patients undergoing surgery for malignant cerebral glioma.

Treatment of Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Vein Thrombosis with Rivaroxaban: A Pilot, Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Anticoagulation plays a crucial role in the treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), including thrombosis of the portal (PVT), mesenteric (MVT) and splenic (SpVT) veins. Rivaroxaban is a potential alternative to heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in these patients, but data to support its use are scant. Several recent guidelines highlighted the limited evidence available for the use of the direct oral anticoagulants in these patients. In addition, despite anticoagulation, SVT patients carry high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolic events.The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the acute-phase treatment of SVT (first 3 months of treatment).Methods: RIVASVT-100 (NCT02627053) was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with a first episode of symptomatic, objectively diagnosed PVT, MVT or SpVT. Exclusion criteria were known liver cirrhosis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, previous or ongoing variceal bleeding, portal cavernoma, thrombocytopenia, severe renal failure, life expectancy <3 months, concomitant interfering medications, treatment with therapeutic dose of heparins for >7 days, ongoing VKA treatment.Patients received rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for a total of 3 months. Afterwards, the decision to continue any available anticoagulant drug was left to the discretion of the attending physicians. Follow-up was performed at 3 weeks, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months.Primary outcome was the occurrence of ISTH-defined major bleeding events during the 3 months of active treatment and up to 2 days after the end of study treatment. Secondary outcomes included death, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent SVT or symptomatic venous thromboembolism in other sites. We here report the results of the 3-month follow-up.Results: Between June 2015 and March 2021, 103 patients were enrolled from 18 participating centres. After excluding 3 patients who did not meet the criteria for eligibility, 100 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 54.4 (± 15.5) years; 64% were males. Overall, 74% of patients had PVT, 61% MVT and 48% SpVT; 53% of SVT occurred in multiple sites. The most common risk factors were abdominal inflammation/infection (26%), followed by solid cancer (9%), overt myeloproliferative neoplasms (9%) and oestrogen hormonal therapy (9%), while 43% of cases were unprovoked. The JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 13 out of 50 tested patients (26%).Rivaroxaban was the sole anticoagulant agent used in 21% of patients, whereas the remaining received a combination of anticoagulants, which included low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin or fondaparinux for a median of 5.0 days before transitioning to rivaroxaban.Three patients were lost to follow-up but known to be alive at the end of the study. At 3-month follow-up, 1 (1.0%) patient died due to a non-SVT related cause. Two patients (2.06%; 95% CI, 0.57-7.21) had major bleeding events (both gastrointestinal), while 3 patients (3.09%) had CRNMB. There were 2 recurrent SVT (2.06%) during rivaroxaban treatment, one of these occurred in a patient with metastatic solid cancer. The 6-month follow-up for the last enrolled patient is ongoing.Conclusions: Rivaroxaban appears to be safe and effective for the acute-phase treatment of SVT in non-cirrhotic patients. DisclosuresBeyer-Westendorf: Bayer: Other: Personal fees; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Personal fees; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees; Portola-Alexion: Other: Personal fees. Carrier: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Bertoletti: BMS: Honoraria, Other: Personal Fees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Aspen: Other: Personal Fees; Bayer: Other: Personal Fees; Leo Pharma: Other: Personal Fee. Di Nisio: Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS-Pfizer, Leo Pharma, and Sanofi: Other: Personal fees. Ageno: Bayer: Research Funding; Bayer, Portola, Janssen, Aspen, Norgine, Sanofi.: Other: Advisory Board. OffLabel Disclosure:The use of rivaroxaban in splanchnic vein thrombosis is off label in most countries.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with CAT: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of 3 Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: CALLISTO, a comprehensive programme of research on cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) , included 3 randomized trials of rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of venous thrombosis in patients with solid and haematological cancers (SELECT-D, CASTA-DIVA and CONKO-11). A meta-analysis of these studies was conducted to improve the precision of current estimates of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in this patient group and investigate how patient characteristics impact the treatment effects.Methods: The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence at the end of the treatment period (≥3 months). Other endpoints included major bleeding (MB), a composite of MB or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (clinically relevant bleeding [CRB]) and deaths from any cause. All endpoints were assessed by 8 pre-defined subgroup analyses: age, gender, creatinine clearance, type of index VTE, index VTE localization, cancer localization, performance status and presence of metastases (Prospero submission 266227). Patient-level data were used in this analysis.The cumulative incidences of VTE recurrence, CRB were estimated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice model, while the Kaplan-Meier model was used to estimate the incidence of death. Comparisons between rivaroxaban and LMWH for VTE recurrence, MB and CRB were assessed by sub-distribution hazard ratios (SubHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), whereas hazard ratios and 95% CIs were used for the all-cause death endpoint. The pooled treatment effect size of each study was estimated using fixed-effect and random-effects models.Results: When considering the prevention of VTE recurrence in the 3 randomized trials (N=804), an overall reduction of 48% was observed with rivaroxaban compared with LMWH (SubHR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.28─0.98). The estimation appeared to be homogeneous across subgroups of patients. In comparison with LMWH, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of CRB (SubHR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.34─3.09), without significant difference in MB (SubHR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.60─2.57), and no difference was observed for death.Conclusions: This pooled analysis suggests that rivaroxaban may be an alternative treatment option for the prevention of VTE recurrence in cancer patients with VTE. The gain in statistical power has shown significant benefit, as well as some risk associated with rivaroxaban treatment in this complex patient population. The impact of patient characteristics on these treatment effects will be presented at the meeting. DisclosuresLaporte: Bayer Healthcare: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; Pfizer: Other: non-financial support; LEO Pharma: Other: non-financial support. Marshall: Bayer: Research Funding. Young: BMS/Pfizer Alliance: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Riess: Bristel Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; ASPEN: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Sinn: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zenica: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Girard: Bayer Healthcare: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Other: Perconal fees, Research Funding. Sanchez: BAYER: Other: reports grants, personal fees and non-financial suppor; BMS: Other: grants, personal fees and non-financial support; PFIZER: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; CHIESI: Other: personal fees; BOSTON SCIENTIFICS: Other: grants and personal fees.

Two-year outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban: results from RIVER registry

Abstract Introduction Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were recommended in preference to oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the 2020 updated guidelines for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Rivaroxaban is a NOAC that is approved in many countries worldwide for reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose To explore the baseline characteristics, dosing and 2-year outcomes of patients with AF treated with rivaroxaban. Methods RIVaroxaban Evaluation in Real Life setting (RIVER) is a prospective international, multicenter registry of patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke and at least one investigator-determined risk factor for stroke. Results A total of 5043 patients were enrolled into RIVER between January 2015 and June 2017. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 69.5 (11.0) years and 55.7% were males. Caucasian patients represented the largest proportion of patients in RIVER (80.3%), followed by Asians (5.5%) and hispanic/latino (3.7%). Almost all patients (98.5%) were prescribed a single daily dose of rivaroxaban, most commonly 20 mg (77.3%) and 15 mg (20.4%), while a 10 mg dose was prescribed in only 2.3% of patients. During the 2-year follow-up, the rates (95% CI) of all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding were 2.75 (2.43 to 3.12), 0.89 (0.72; 1.11), and 1.26 (1.05 to 1.52) per 100 person years, respectively (Figure 1). The most common cardiovascular cause of death was congestive heart failure (30.4%) and myocardial infarction (11.4%). Leading non-cardiovascular causes of death were malignancy (27.4%), respiratory failure (18.9%) and infections/sepsis (13.2%). Over 2 years, 710 (14.1%) of patients discontinued rivaroxaban. The corresponding proportions at 6 months and 1 year were 7.8% and 10.8%, respectively. Out of all the patients who discontinued, 62 (8.7%) restarted rivaroxaban during their follow-up (Table 1). Conclusion During 2 years of follow up in the international, prospective RIVER registry, rivaroxaban treatment for AF was associated with low rates of stroke or major bleeding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany, to TRI, London, UK. This work is supported by KANTOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION for the Kantor-Kakkar Global Centre for Thrombosis Science.

Design and Baseline Data for a Prospective Observational Study of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in Japan (XASSENT).

Background The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban have been demonstrated in phase 3 trials of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE; pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]). Data regarding rivaroxaban treatment of VTE in routine Japanese clinical practice remain limited. Objectives XASSENT will evaluate rivaroxaban treatment of VTE in real-world Japanese clinical practice. We report the study design and baseline patient characteristics. Methods XASSENT (NCT02558465) is an open-label, prospective observational, post-marketing surveillance cohort study in patients receiving rivaroxaban treatment for VTE. Enrolment took place between November 2015 and March 2018. XASSENT will follow patients for up to 2 years. Primary outcome variables: major bleeding and symptomatic recurrent VTE. Statistical analyses are exploratory and descriptive. Results Baseline patient characteristics at June 2020 ( n = 2,299) are presented (58.2% female; mean age 66.7 years; mean weight 60.9 kg). The population encompasses patients with wide-ranging characteristics including older age, low weight, and renal dysfunction. Most participants (67.6%) had a history of VTE risk factors at baseline. Half of the population (50.4%) had DVT only; 41.4% had DVT with PE; 8.2% had PE only. Overall, 68.4% were inpatients and 77.1% had symptomatic VTE. Rivaroxaban was prescribed for initial treatment in 84.6% of patients and maintenance treatment in 15.4%. Most were prescribed the approved dose of rivaroxaban for initial (30 mg daily; 84.4%) or maintenance (15 mg daily; 81.9%) treatment of VTE in Japan. The most common reason for selecting non-recommended dose was ‘elderly’. Conclusions Results from XASSENT will complement phase 3 trial data and inform clinical practice.

Association of Sex With Stroke and Bleeding Risk of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban in Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Propensity Score Weights

BackgroundEvidence from clinical trials suggests a differential effect of sex on the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). MethodsThis population-based cohort study examined the independent effect of sex on hemorrhage and ischemic stroke in 23,884 patients (55% females; age ≥ 66 years) with AF starting apixaban or rivaroxaban treatment in Ontario, Canada. Patients were followed for 90 days after their DOAC prescription. Using female sex as the exposure of interest, differences in baseline characteristics were balanced between sexes using inverse probability weights based on propensity scores. Applying weighted modified Poisson regression, risk ratios (RRs) were estimated for major hemorrhage, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack (hereafter stroke), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, with males as a reference. ResultsFemales were older, had higher predicted stroke risk (based on CHADS2 score), and had fewer comorbidities than did males. Males had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, diabetes, and cancer, and similar predicted bleeding risk (based on HAS-BLED score). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The 90-day risks for hemorrhage (RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.15; P = 0.69) and stroke (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19; P = 0.94) were similar between sexes, which remained true when assessing each DOAC separately by dosing regimen. Compared to males, females had a lower risk for myocardial infarction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84; P = 0.0008), and for all-cause mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.87; P < 0.0001). ConclusionsOur findings do not suggest an association of sex with the 90-day risk of hemorrhage or ischemic stroke in older AF patients prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Evaluation of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of cerebral vein thrombosis: A case-control blinded study

Background: Anticoagulation therapy following cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) can improve mortality and morbidity. Vitamin K antagonists are currently the routine oral anticoagulant used for CVT; while by introduction of rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, the attentions have been deviated toward novel agents, but the evidence is not strong. The current study is aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for anticoagulation therapy of CVT. Methods: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 50 patients with CVT among which, 25 ones were randomly allocated to rivaroxaban treatment (20 mg per day for three months) and remained 25 ones to warfarin treatment [adjusted based on international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3]. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and clinical investigations, including the incidence of seizure, papilledema, intra/extra-cranial bleeding, blurred vision, headache, nausea and vomiting, and death were evaluated at discharge time and within 3 and 6 months following CVT incidence; eventually, two groups were compared. Results: Comparison of mRS scores between the groups revealed significant differences in none of the interval assessments, at the time of admission (P = 0.510), within three months (P = 0.630), and within six months (P = 0.990), while both of the approaches led to significant decrease in mRS scores following both of the treatments (P < 0.001). The comparison of drug-related adverse effects showed insignificant difference between warfarin versus rivaroxaban (P > 0.050). Conclusion: Based on this study, rivaroxaban is an efficacious agent for the treatment of CVT without remarkable adverse effects.