Rituximab In Adults Research Articles

Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

Rituximab for Adults With Multi-Drug Resistant Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Background:Adults with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are frequently resistant to multiple immunosuppressive agents, which is associated with ongoing complications of nephrotic syndrome and a high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B cell CD20 antigen, has shown some preliminary evidence in treating nephrotic syndrome.Objectives:Describe the usage and the efficacy of rituximab for adults with FSGS in British Columbia (BC) (Canada) and perform a literature review of multi-immunosuppressive drug resistant FSGS in adult patients treated with rituximab to estimate the overall response rate.Design:Case series report and a literature review.Patients:For the case-series, all BC patients who received rituximab for a diagnosis of primary FSGS were included. The literature review included all cases of immunosuppressive-resistant FSGS patients treated with rituximab. We excluded transplant and pediatric patients in both groups.Methods:We describe all cases of adults with native-kidney FSGS resistant to conventional immunosuppressive medications from our provincial health database who were treated with rituximab from 2014 to 2018. A review of the existing literature was performed via PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase using the following keywords: rituximab, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and FSGS up to August 2019.Results:We characterize four immunosuppressive-resistant FSGS patients who were treated with rituximab as part of our provincial program, all of whom showed a response to rituximab with a sustained remission. We found 29 specific cases in the literature of adults with native-kidney FSGS treated with rituximab after being resistant to other immunosuppressive medications, of whom 15 cases showed a response to rituximab. This has increased the total response rate from 15/29 (52%) to 19/33 (58%).Limitations:Literature on this topic is coming predominantly from case series. Prospective trials are needed to confirm efficacy, tolerability, and duration of remission.Conclusions:Due to the low number of currently reported cases and variable response rates, these four cases provide critical data to generate a more accurate understanding of the role of rituximab in adults with resistant FSGS. Adding these results to the confirmed literature cases of multiple-immunosuppressive-resistant FSGS patients treated with rituximab results in a total remission rate of 19/33 cases.

TAK-981, a First-in-Class SUMO-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, Combined with Rituximab in Adult Patients (Pts) with CD20-Positive Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Phase 1 Data

TAK-981, a First-in-Class SUMO-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, Combined with Rituximab in Adult Patients (Pts) with CD20-Positive Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Phase 1 Data

Rituximab therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundUse of rituximab (RTX) for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and minimal change disease (MCD) is widely described in children. Clinical evidence in adults is limited. The objective of this study was to determine the treatment outcomes of RTX in adults with FSGS and MCD.MethodsOvid MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched up to September 2019. Out of 699 studies, we included 16 studies describing the treatment outcomes of rituximab in adult patients with FSGS or MCD. Results were reported in remission rate and relapse rate. Serious adverse events were also reported.ResultsA total of 16 studies were included in our review and analysis. All studies were observational studies and included a total of 221 patients (23.1% FSGS, 76.9% MCD). Mean follow-up duration was 26.3 ± 12.8 months. From the analysis of five studies with FSGS patients (n = 51), the overall remission rate and relapse rate of RTX therapy was 53.6% (95% CI, 15.8–87.6%) and 47.3% (95% CI, 25.4–70.2%), respectively. Complete remission occurred in 42.9%. In contrast, from the analysis of 11 studies with MCD patients (n = 170), the overall remission rate and relapse rate of RTX therapy was 80.3% (95% CI, 68.5–88.5%) and 35.9% (95% CI, 25.1–48.4), respectively. Complete remission occurred in 74.7%. Subgroup analyses showed that overall remission and relapse were not different after adjusted for study year and RTX dose for both FSGS and MCD. Incidence of serious adverse events was 0.092 events/year.ConclusionsRituximab may be considered as an additional treatment to the standard therapy for adult patients with FSGS and MCD. Remissions and relapses are similar between FSGS and MCD. Serious adverse effects of rituximab were uncommon. We encourage further randomized controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of rituximab therapy in these patients.

The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab demonstrates activity in first-line follicular lymphoma.

SummaryThis phase 2 study evaluated the activity and safety of ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus rituximab in adults with previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Patients received once‐daily ibrutinib 560 mg continuously plus once‐weekly rituximab 375 mg/m2 for 4 weeks beginning Week 1 (Arm 1, n = 60) or Week 9 (following an 8‐week ibrutinib lead‐in) to explore biomarkers (Arm 2, n = 20). The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (ORR). The median age was 58 years; most had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 (74%) and Stage III/IV disease (84%). At a median study follow‐up of 34 months in Arm 1 and 29 months in Arm 2, ORRs were 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73–93] and 75% (95% CI 51–91), respectively, with complete responses in 40% and 50%. The median duration of response was not reached in either arm; 30‐month progression‐free and overall survival rates were 67% and 97% (Arm 1) and 65% and 100% (Arm 2). The most common adverse events were fatigue, diarrhoea and nausea. Higher grade (Grade 3/4) haematological, haemorrhagic and cardiac events occurred infrequently. Ibrutinib plus rituximab was active and tolerable in first‐line follicular lymphoma.

Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study of subcutaneous belimumab administered in combination with rituximab in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): BLISS-BELIEVE study protocol

IntroductionBelimumab, an anti-B-lymphocyte-stimulator antibody, is approved for the treatment of active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Rituximab, a B cell-depleting anti-CD20 antibody, remains in the SLE treatment armamentarium despite failed...

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Treatment of Rituximab and Dexamethasone for Adults with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Meta-Analysis.

Objective. To conduct a meta-analysis, assessing the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment of dexamethasone and rituximab for adults with ITP (primary immune thrombocytopenia). Methods. Randomized controlled trials that compared rituximab and dexamethasone combination treatment to dexamethasone monotherapy in the treatment of adults with ITP were collected by searching Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, China National Knowledge (CNKI), Wanfang database, and Sino Med. We conducted pooled analyses on OR (overall response) rate, CR (complete response) rate, PR (partial response) rate, SR (sustained response) rate, R (relapse) rate, change in Treg cell count (mean [SD]), and AE (adverse event). GRADE pro scale was used to assess the quality of the evidence. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test method. Results. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. The overall efficacy estimates favored combination arm in terms of OR rate at month 3, CR rate at week 4 and month 3, SR rate, and Treg cell count at week 2. Subgroup analysis showed that females obtained a higher OR rate than males did at week 4. No significant difference was found in pooled analysis of relapse rate between combination arm and monotherapy arm. The comparison of serious AE and other AEs showed no significant difference either. A total of 19 outcomes were assessed by GRADE pro software, of which 79% (15/19) was scaled as moderate-to-high level. Publication bias existed in studies on OR at week 4 (P=0.025), CR at week 4 (P=0.017), infection (P=0.006), and rash (P=0.028) of the AEs. Conclusion. Dexamethasone combined with rituximab can provide a better long-term response in the treatment of adults with ITP and will not increase the risk of adverse effects.

The Evolving Role of Rituximab in Adult Minimal Change Glomerulopathy

Background: Minimal-change glomerulopathy is defined histologically by the presence of normal glomeruli on light microscopy and diffuse podocyte effacement on electron microscopy. Although effective in children, corticosteroid treatment in adults is more variable and time to response can be prolonged. Data to support rituximab use in adults with corticosteroid-dependent or resistant minimal-change glomerulopathy are limited. Here, we describe the clinical course of adults with corticosteroid-dependent or -resistant minimal-change glomerulopathy who received rituximab. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed from all adult patients with native kidney, biopsy-proven, minimal-change glomerulopathy who were administered rituximab between 2009 and 2014 and cared for at the UNC Kidney Center. Results: Ten patients with corticosteroid-resistant (n = 5) or corticosteroid-dependent (n = 5) idiopathic minimal-change glomerulopathy were treated with rituximab between 2009 and 2014. Rituximab treatment induced remission in all 10 patients with a median time to remission of 2 months. The median time from rituximab to corticosteroid discontinuation was 3.5 months. The median remission time was 29 months and follow-up time was 39.5 months. No serious adverse events attributable to rituximab were observed. Conclusion: Rituximab induced remission in all patients with corticosteroid-dependent or -resistant minimal-change glomerulopathy, and may hold great therapeutic potential with good efficacy and minimal toxicity. Mounting evidence implies that a well-conducted randomized controlled clinical trial using rituximab in adults with minimal-change glomerulopathy in both corticosteroid-resistant and corticosteroid-dependent patients is warranted.

Controversies in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia

We address three current controversies in management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Should asymptomatic children with newly diagnosed ITP and severe thrombocytopenia be treated? Does intensification of up-front therapy in adults with newly diagnosed ITP impact long-term outcomes? Is splenectomy still the second-line treatment of choice in adults with chronic ITP? Severe bleeding is rare in children with ITP. There is little evidence that the platelet count predicts or that treatment prevents severe bleeding in this population. Intensified treatment with high-dose dexamethasone and rituximab in adults with newly diagnosed ITP is associated with improved platelet responses at 6 and 12 months but greater toxicity compared with standard therapy. Rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists have emerged as suitable alternatives to splenectomy for second-line management of adults with chronic ITP. We generally observe children with newly diagnosed ITP and mild or no bleeding symptoms, irrespective of platelet count. We do not routinely use intensified up-front therapy in adults with newly diagnosed ITP. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of splenectomy, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists with our patients and make a joint decision that takes into consideration age, comorbidities, lifestyle, values, preferences, and financial considerations.

The role of rituximab in adults with warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia

AbstractWarm antibody hemolytic anemia is the most common form of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. When therapy is needed, corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of initial treatment but are able to cure only a minority of patients (<20%). Splenectomy is usually proposed when a second-line therapy is needed. This classical approach is now challenged by the use of rituximab both as second-line and as first-line therapy. Second-line treatment with rituximab leads to response rates similar to splenectomy (∼70%), but rituximab-induced responses seem less sustained. However, additional courses of rituximab are most often followed by responses, at the price of reasonable toxicity. In some major European centers, rituximab is now the preferred second-line therapy of warm antibody hemolytic anemia in adults, although no prospective study convincingly supports this attitude. A recent randomized study strongly suggests that in first-line treatment, rituximab combined with steroids is superior to monotherapy with steroids. If this finding is confirmed, rituximab will emerge as a major component of the management of warm antibody hemolytic anemia not only after relapse but as soon as treatment is needed.

Treatment of primary Sjögren syndrome with rituximab: a randomized trial.

Primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by ocular and oral dryness or systemic manifestations. To evaluate efficacy and harms of rituximab in adults with recent-onset or systemic pSS. Randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted between March 2008 and January 2011. Study personnel (except pharmacists), investigators, and patients were blinded to treatment group. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00740948). 14 university hospitals in France. 120 patients with scores of 50 mm or greater on at least 2 of 4 visual analogue scales (VASs) (global disease, pain, fatigue, and dryness) and recent-onset (< 10 years) biologically active or systemic pSS. Randomization (1:1 ratio) to rituximab (1 g at weeks 0 and 2) or placebo. Primary end point was improvement of at least 30 mm in 2 of 4 VASs by week 24. No significant difference between groups in the primary end point was found (difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -16.7% to 18.7%]). The proportion of patients with at least 30-mm decreases in at least two of the four VAS scores was higher in the rituximab group at week 6 (22.4% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.036). An improvement of at least 30 mm in VAS fatigue score was more common with rituximab at weeks 6 (P < 0.001) and 16 (P = 0.012), and improvement in fatigue from baseline to week 24 was greater with rituximab. Adverse events were similar between groups except for a higher rate of infusion reactions with rituximab. Low disease activity at baseline and a primary outcome that may have been insensitive to detect clinically important changes. Rituximab did not alleviate symptoms or disease activity in patients with pSS at week 24, although it alleviated some symptoms at earlier time points.

Safety and Efficacy Of Rituximab In adult's Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) : Results After One-Year Of Follow-Up In 252 Patients From The Prospective French ITP-Ritux Registry

Introduction Adults with ITP usually respond to corticosteroids but typically relapse after discontinuation. Rituximab is thought to be an effective off-label second-line treatment but only few prospective data exist about its long-term efficacy and its long-term safety is a matter of concern. The tolerance and particularly the risk of severe infection is a crucial factor for assessing the risk/benefit ratio of this treatment in ITP. Three years ago, we opened a non-interventional prospective registry in France to investigate the safety (primary outcome) and the efficacy of rituximab in off-trials adults with ITP (ClinicalTrials.Gov: NC1101295). Two hundred and fifty two patients were included on a two-year period. A follow-up duration of five-year is planned. We report here the first results after one year of follow-up. Methods The ITP-Ritux registry was set up by the French reference center of adult’s immune cytopenias. Thirty one centers participated to the study. Consecutive patients diagnosed with primary ITP according to the international guidelines (Rodeghiero et al, Blood 2009) who were treated with rituximab were included. Patients with a secondary ITP and those who were previously treated with rituximab were excluded. Response to treatment was assessed according to international guidelines: complete response (CR) was defined by platelet count ³100x109/L and response (R) by a platelet count between 30 and 100x109/L with at least a doubling of the pre-treatment count. The prospective and sequential monitoring of rituximab efficacy and safety was made by using of a standardized electronic case report form. Study nurses visited each center regularly to update the clinical and biological data on the enrolled patients. Results Between July 2010 and July 2012, 252 patients (64% of females) with a mean age of 51±21 (16-97) years were enrolled. The median duration of ITP was 1.3 (0-56) years with 44 patients (17%) with a newly diagnosed ITP, 61 (24%) with persistent ITP and 147 (58%) with chronic ITP at time of rituximab treatment. The median platelet counts at time of ITP diagnosis and rituximab first infusion were respectively 18x109/L (1-100) and 17x109/L (1-186). Patients received a median of 2 treatment lines (range 0-7) before rituximab and 25 (10%) were splenectomized. The standard regimen of 375 mg/m2 weekly rituximab infusions for 4 weeks was administered to 179 patients whereas 73 patients (29%) received a fixed dose of 1000 mg on day 1 and day 15. At time of the present analysis, the median follow-up was 18 months and the one-year response was available in 209 patients. A one-year overall response was observed in 90/209 (43%) patients including a CR in 28% and a R in 15%. Nineteen patients who failed to respond to rituximab were splenectomized during the year following rituximab infusions. Sixty eight adverse events occurred in 47 patients (19%). Rituximab infusions have to be stopped in only 3 patients for severe hypotension, dyspnoea with laryngeal discomfort and reversible serum sickness respectively. Three other patients developed severe adverse event related to rituximab requiring admission in hospital including 1 episode of profound neutropenia while 6 episodes of infections occurred in 2 patients. Seven patients (2.7%) have died during follow-up, 52 to 385 days after rituximab infusions. All patients who died but one aged of 18 were 68 to 98-year old. Only one death could be potentially related to rituximab (enterococcus faecium pulmonary infection), 2 deaths were of unknown origin, other causes were: suicide (n=1), multiple myeloma (n=1) and fatal haemorrhage related to ITP (n=2). We did not observe any episode of progressive multifocal encephalopathy or any other case of opportunistic infection. Discussion and conclusion Our preliminary results based on the first large non-interventional prospective registry of ITP-adults treated with rituximab in the “real life” confirm that this treatment leads overall to 40% of response after one year of follow-up. Safety of rituximab at 1 year appears to be good since severe infections were uncommon and no opportunistic infections were observed. The ongoing monitoring and upcoming analysis with a planned follow-up up to 5-years will provide more data on long-term safety. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Therapy of relapsing minimal-change disease in adults: a new approach?

Multiple-relapsing minimal-change disease (MCD) often requires exposure to potentially toxic agents in an attempt to achieve a lasting remission of nephrotic syndrome. Munyentwali and co-workers describe an experience using rituximab in adults with multiple-relapsing MCD that supports both efficacy and safety of this agent. However, the optimal dosing regimen and mechanism of action remain unclear. Thus, randomized controlled trials are warranted in both adults and children to better define the role of rituximab in multiple-relapsing MCD.

Efficacy and safety of first-line rituximab in severe, acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with a suboptimal response to plasma exchange. Experience of the French Thrombotic Microangiopathies Reference Center

To assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in adults responding poorly to standard treatment for severe autoimmune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Open-label prospective study. Outcomes in the survivors were compared to those of 53 historical survivors who were given therapeutic plasma exchange alone or with vincristine. Hospitals belonging to the Reference Network for Thrombotic Microangiopathies in France. Twenty-two adults with either no response or a disease exacerbation when treated with intensive therapeutic plasma exchange. Add-on rituximab therapy, four infusions over 15 days. One patient died despite two rituximab infusions. In the rituximab-treated patients, the time to a durable remission was significantly shortened (p = .03), although the plasma volume required to achieve a durable remission was not significantly different compared to the controls. Platelet count recovery occurred within 35 days in all 21 survivors, compared to only 78% of the historical controls (p < .02). Of the rituximab-treated patients, none had a relapse within the first year but three relapsed later on. In patients treated with rituximab, a rapid and profound peripheral B-cell depletion was produced, lasting for 9 months and correlating with higher a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin-13 activity and lower anti-a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin-13 antibody titers. These differences were no longer significant after 12 months. No severe side effects occurred. Adults with severe thrombocytopenic purpura who responded poorly to therapeutic plasma exchange and who were treated with rituximab had shorter overall treatment duration and reduced 1-yr relapses than historical controls.

Long-Term Outcome Following B-Cell Depletion Therapy with Rituximab In Children and Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

AbstractAbstract 72 Background:Studies of B-cell depletion using Rituximab in adults with ITP report responses lasting at least one year in almost all of the 30–40% of patients with complete responses (CR: platelet count >150 × 109/l) and also a small fraction of patients with partial responses (PR: platelet count 50–150 × 109/l). However data describing patients with ITP who are relapse-free and off-treatment beyond 1–2 years from initial Rituximab are almost entirely anecdotal and comparable response data are even less available for children. This study assessed the duration of unmaintained platelet response following rituximab treatment in 72 adults and 66 children with ITP, all of whom had had at least an initial response to rituximab. Long-term outcome was estimated from these data. Methods:Seventeen published studies including 486 patients, 376 adults and 110 children, were used to obtain the initial response rates to standard-dose rituximab treatment (375mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks) in adults and children. Only 1 included study did not use the standard dose of rituximab. The Godeau study (Blood, 2008) was used to estimate the one-year response rate in adults with ITP. Only those adults whose responses persisted at least one year had follow up assessed whereas children who demonstrated even ephemeral responses were included. Only verified counts were used in this IRB-approved multicenter study. Results:138 subjects with CR's or PR's after rituximab were included. All patients had starting platelet counts <30×109/l and 131 (95%) had ITP of > 6 months duration. Thirty-three (24%) had undergone splenectomy. Using the data from prior publications to obtain the initial response rates, children had a 56% initial response rate to rituximab treatment and adults had a 57% rate. Taking initial responders and then using the Godeau data for adults and Kaplan-Meier analysis of our data for children, 38% one-year response rates were obtained for both children and adults treated with rituximab. Both age groups also showed remarkable similarity at two years with 30% relapse-free response rates. However, all of the 26 eligible children maintained their response beyond two years whereas adults continued to relapse. Therefore the five-year response rate was 30% for children and only 21% for adults. Sex, duration of ITP, and age among adults did not affect long-term outcome. The rate of relapse was almost identical for splenectomized patients and non-splenectomized ones but the splenectomized patients appeared to relapse sooner (Figure). Patients with CR's (55 of the 72 adults with responses lasting at least one year were CR's) had better long-term outcomes than did patients with PR's even more than one year from initial treatment. B-cells returned significantly sooner to higher levels in subjects who relapsed compared to those whose responses were ongoing. No clinical long-term toxicity was observed but 2 patients were identified to have mild hypogammaglobulinemia > 30 months from initial treatment. Conclusions:In summary, only approximately 1 in 5 adults treated with rituximab will have an at least five-year relapse-free response rate which is disappointingly low; children have only a slightly higher five-year relapse-free response rate. A pilot study to improve outcomes using either R-CVP or double dose rituximab was unsuccessful (Hasan, Am J Hematol,2009) Current efforts to improve long-term response rates have focused on the combination of high dose dexamethasone and rituximab (or even by providing maintenance treatment with rituximab). A better understanding of the mechanism of effect of rituximab in patients with ITP might allow an improved treatment strategy to be developed. Fortunately, the toxicity of rituximab treatment in patients with uncomplicated ITP appears to be low; however, yearly testing for immunoglobulins for a minimum of five years might be appropriate. [Display omitted] Disclosures:Neufeld:Novartis. Inc: Research Funding. Shenoy:Novartis Oncology: Honoraria. Bussel:Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy.

Long Term Follow up Analysis Following Front Line Therapy with Dexamethasone or Dexamethasone Plus Rituximab in Adults with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Abstract 2415Poster Board II-392We previously reported that in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) the addition of four weekly administrations of rituximab 375 mg/m2 to a single course of dexamethasone (40 mg daily for four days) improves the rate of sustained response (SR, i.e. platelet count 3 50 × 109/L at month 6 from the beginning of treatment) if compared with dexamethasone alone (63% vs 36%, P= 0.004, 95% C.I.: [0.079-0.455]) (ML18542 study, Zaja et al. Blood 2008; 112:Abstract 1). Moreover, the rate of SR in 27 patients receiving dexamethasone plus rituximab salvage therapy because of primary refractoriness or relapse after dexamethasone monotherapy was 56%. In order to better address the impact of therapy beyond month 6, a subsequent observational follow-up study up which lasted from month 6 up to month 36 was planned. Participating centers were asked to continue to monitor the patients enrolled in the ML18542 study at least every 4 months up to the end of year 3 from accrual, documenting the occurrence of delayed side effects, the response status and the need for further treatment. We considered as efficacy parameters the duration of response (RD), i.e. the interval between achievement of SR and relapse, the relapse rate (number of patients who lost their SR status) and the need of further specific anti ITP therapy after month 6 (TFS). Eighty out of the original 101 patients enrolled in the ML18542 study, 15 treated with the dexamethasone monotherapy arm, 41 with the dexamethasone plus rituximab arm and 24 who received dexamethasone plus rituximab salvage therapy, were systematically followed-up beyond month 6 for a median overall period of observation of 20 months (range: 4-40 months). Twenty-one patients could not be valuable, most of them because lost at follow up during the study period. As far as the safety profile, we documented one single case of Herpes Zoster reactivation at month 22 in a patient initially allocated to the dexamethasone arm who further received dexamethasone plus rituximab salvage therapy. No other infectious, delayed toxic events or deaths were registered. Fifty-three out 80 patients who achieved a SR according to the study protocol could be evaluated for long term efficacy. This group included 13 patients from the dexamethasone monotherapy arm who were observed after month 6 for a median period of 20 months (range: 12-28 months), 26 of dexamethasone plus rituximab arm observed for a median period of 24 months (range: 8-40 months), and 14 from the dexamethasone plus rituximab salvage therapy group observed for a median period of 20 months (range: 12-34). The rate of relapse in the three groups was 23% (3/13), 23% (6/26), and 14% (2/14) respectively (Fisher test, P= 0.824). The 30 months estimated probability of RD within each of the three treatment groups was 77%, 71%, and 85% (Log-rank test, P= 0.755), respectively. The time of SR loss was comprised between month 4 and 30 in the dexamethasone monotherapy arm, month 4 and 40 in the experimental arm, and month 8 and 34 in the salvage therapy arm. In these three groups, the use of further specific anti ITP therapy after month 6 was registered in 33%, 29% and 36% of patients (Fisher test, P= 1), respectively. Overall, in this period of observation 4 out 80 (5%) valuable patients underwent splenectomy. In conclusion the results of this study indicate: i) similar and very low pattern of long term toxicity between ITP patients treated either with single course of dexamethasone or dexamethasone plus rituximab; ii) no significant differences in the relapse rate, RD and TFS among patients who achieved SR after dexamethasone monotherapy or dexamethasone plus rituximab, either front line or salvage therapy, suggesting that relapse rate may be a possible surrogate of SR, rather than of the initial therapeutic choice. Disclosures:Zaja:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, financial support for the costs of travel to the ASH annual meeting. Off Label Use: Rituximab in ITP.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Common Variable Immunodeficiency-Associated Immune Cytopenias: a Retrospective Analysis of 10 Cases.

Abstract 1310Poster Board I-332 IntroductionPatients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVI) are at higher risk of developing autoimmune disease and especially auto-immune cytopenias. The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune haemolytic anemia (AHA) in the setting of CVI is often challenging as usual treatments (i.e corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and splenectomy) significantly increase the intrinsic risk of severe infections. While the use of rituximab has shown efficacy in both primary ITP and AHA, its use has been only anecdotally reported in patients with CVI. In order to better assess efficacy and the safety profile of rituximab in adults with CVI-associated ITP and/or AHA, we performed a retrospective study throughout the French network of adult's primary immune deficiencies and the national referral center for adult's immune cytopenias. Patients and MethodsTo be included, all patients had to have a definite diagnosis of CVI according to standard criteria (Conley ME et al. Clin Immunol. 1999; 93:190-197) with a history of secondary (CVI-associated) ITP and/or AIHA treated with rituximab. Patients treated with rituximab before the age of 18, or in whom the hypogammaglobulinemia was assessed only after rituximab were excluded. To assess treatment efficacy, the following criteria were used: for AHA, a complete response (CR) was defined by a hemoglobin (Hb) level ≥ 12 g/dL in the absence of transfusion and without persistent features of hemolysis, and partial response (PR) by a Hb ≥10 g/dl with an increase of at least 2g from baseline and persistent hemolysis. For ITP, CR was defined by a normal platelet count (i.e > 150 × 109/L) and PR by a platelet count > 50×109/L with at least a twofold increase of the pre-treatment count. ResultsThe data from 10 patients (6 women, mean age 44 years ±16) fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The patients were given rituximab for either chronic severe ITP (n=5), refractory AHA (n=2) or Evans' syndrome (n=3). The mean ITP and/or AHA duration at time of first rituximab infusion was 23 months; patients received on average 1.4 treatment-lines prior to rituximab, all of them got corticosteroids and 5/10 (50%) had undergone splenectomy. Rituximab was administered at 4 weekly doses of 375mg/m2 in 9 patients and at 1000 mg on day 1 and 15 in a single patient. One month after the first rituximab infusion, the overall response rate was 90% (7 CR and 2 PR). A single patient with ITP syndrome did not respond to rituximab and subsequently achieved a PR on romiplostim. At time of analysis, after a mean follow-up of 18 ±14 months after rituximab, only 1 patient among the 8 initial responders had a relapse. This patient who was treated for an AHA failed to respond to a second course of rituximab and eventually achieved a CR after splenectomy. Only 2 patients were still on low dose of corticosteroids (i.e prednisone 5 mg/day) at time of analysis. The overall safety was good as no cases of severe infections were observed after rituximab except 1 case of aseptic meningitis which occurred one week after the first rituximab infusion in a patient with Evans' and resolved under broad-spectrum iv antibiotics. During the follow-up period after rituximab administration, 8 out of the 10 patients were on substitutive immunoglobulin therapy. At time of analysis, 1 patient had died 2 years after being treated with rituximab from an unrelated cause (hemorrhage after a lobectomy for bronchectasis). ConclusionBased on these preliminary data, rituximab appears to be a safe and effective option for the management of chronic severe immune cytopenias in patients with an underlying CVI. This treatment should therefore be considered as a possible alternative to splenectomy and immunosuppressive drugs in this subgroup of patients at high risk of infections. The mechanisms of action of rituximab in this setting remain to be determined. DisclosuresOff Label Use: Rituximab as a treatment of CVI-associated immune cytopenias.

Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled multicenter trial

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody selectively depleting CD20+ B cells, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated rituximab in adults with primary progressive MS (PPMS) through 96 weeks and safety through 122 weeks. Using 2:1 randomization, 439 PPMS patients received two 1,000 mg intravenous rituximab or placebo infusions every 24 weeks, through 96 weeks (4 courses). The primary endpoint was time to confirmed disease progression (CDP), a prespecified increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale sustained for 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline to week 96 in T2 lesion volume and total brain volume on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Differences in time to CDP between rituximab and placebo did not reach significance (96-week rates: 38.5% placebo, 30.2% rituximab; p = 0.14). From baseline to week 96, rituximab patients had less (p < 0.001) increase in T2 lesion volume; brain volume change was similar (p = 0.62) to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed time to CDP was delayed in rituximab-treated patients aged <51 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; p = 0.010), those with gadolinium-enhancing lesions (HR = 0.41; p = 0.007), and those aged <51 years with gadolinium-enhancing lesions (HR = 0.33; p = 0.009) compared with placebo. Adverse events were comparable between groups; 16.1% of rituximab and 13.6% of placebo patients reported serious events. Serious infections occurred in 4.5% of rituximab and <1.0% of placebo patients. Infusion-related events, predominantly mild to moderate, were more common with rituximab during the first course, and decreased to rates comparable to placebo on successive courses. Although time to CDP between groups was not significant, overall subgroup analyses suggest selective B-cell depletion may affect disease progression in younger patients, particularly those with inflammatory lesions.

Slow responses to standard dose rituximab in immune thrombocytopenic purpura

We read with interest the article by Zaja et al . in which the results of a prospective multicenter Phase II study to assess the response rates of lower dose rituximab in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) were reported.[1][1] In this single arm study 28 ITP patients received

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in adults' warm antibody autoimmune haemolytic anemia: Retrospective analysis of 27 cases

To better assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in adults' warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA), we conducted a retrospective study including 27 adults (mean age 49.7 +/- 21 years) with either primary (n = 17) or secondary (n = 10) wAIHA. On average, the patients received 2.1 +/- 1.4 treatment lines before rituximab and six had undergone splenectomy. Five patients were resistant to corticosteroids, 16 had a corticosteroid-dependent wAIHA and six had relapsed after an initial remission. Overall, 25/27 (93%) patients achieved an initial response from rituximab (eight complete responses and 17 partial responses). During a mean follow-up of 20.9 months after rituximab, five of the responders relapsed, three of whom were successfully retreated with rituximab. Two mild infusion-related-reactions occurred, one patient had a rituximab-related severe neutropenia and one case of pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia occurred in a severely immunocompromized patient. In conclusion, rituximab seems highly effective and relatively safe in adults with steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent wAIHA.