Ritonavir Exposure Research Articles

Up‐regulation of P‐glycoprotein by HIV protease inhibitors in a human brain microvessel endothelial cell line

A major concern regarding the chronic administration of antiretroviral drugs is the potential for induction of drug efflux transporter expression (i.e., P-glycoprotein, P-gp) at tissue sites that can significantly affect drug distribution and treatment efficacy. Previous data have shown that the inductive effect of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors (PIs) is mediated through the human orphan nuclear receptor, steroid xenobiotic receptor (SXR or hPXR). The objectives of this study were to investigate transport and inductive properties on efflux drug transporters of two PIs, atazanavir and ritonavir, at the blood-brain barrier by using a human brain microvessel endothelial cell line, hCMEC/D3. Transport properties of PIs by the drug efflux transporters P-gp and multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) were assessed by measuring the cellular uptake of (3)H-atazanavir or (3)H-ritonavir in P-gp and MRP1 overexpressing cells as well as hCMEC/D3. Whereas the P-gp inhibitor, PSC833, increased atazanavir and ritonavir accumulation in hCMEC/D3 cells by 2-fold, the MRP inhibitor MK571 had no effect. P-gp, MRP1, and hPXR expression and localization were examined by Western blot analysis and immunogold cytochemistry at the electron microscope level. Treatment of hCMEC/D3 cells for 72 hr with rifampin or SR12813 (two well-established hPXR ligands) or PIs (atazanavir or ritonavir) resulted in an increase in P-gp expression by 1.8-, 6-, and 2-fold, respectively, with no effect observed for MRP1 expression. In hCMEC/D3 cells, cellular accumulation of these PIs appears to be primarily limited by P-gp efflux activity. Long-term exposure of atazanavir or ritonavir to brain microvessel endothelium may result in further limitations in brain drug permeability as a result of the up-regulation of P-gp expression and function.

Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract on lopinavir, midazolam and fexofenadine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

ABSTRACTObjective: Animal and in vitro data suggest that Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) may modulate CYP3A4 activity. As such, GBE may alter the exposure of HIV protease inhibitors metabolized by CYP3A4. It is also possible that GBE could alter protease inhibitor pharmacokinetics (PK) secondary to modulation of P-glycoprotein (P‑gp). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of GBE on the exposure of lopinavir in healthy volunteers administered lopinavir/ritonavir. Secondary objectives were to compare ritonavir exposure pre- and post-GBE, and assess the effect of GBE on single doses of probe drugs midazolam and fexofenadine.Methods: This open-label study evaluated the effect of 2 weeks of standardized GBE administration on the steady-state exposure of lopinavir and ritonavir in 14 healthy volunteers administered lopinavir/ritonavir to steady-state. In addition, single oral doses of probe drugs midazolam and fexofenadine were administered prior to and after 4 weeks of GBE (following washout of lopinavir/ritonavir) to assess the influence of GBE on CYP3A and P‑gp activity, respectively.Results: Lopinavir, ritonavir and fexofenadine exposures were not significantly affected by GBE administration. However, GBE decreased midazolam AUC0–∞ and Cmax by 34% ( p = 0.03) and 31% ( p = 0.03), respectively, relative to baseline. In general, lopinavir/ritonavir and GBE were well tolerated. Abnormal laboratory results included mild elevations in hepatic enzymes, cholesterol and triglycerides, and mild-to-moderate increases in total bilirubin.Conclusions: Our results suggest that GBE induces CYP3A metabolism, as assessed by a decrease in midazolam concentrations. However, there was no change in the exposure of lopinavir, likely due to ritonavir's potent inhibition of CYP3A4. Thus, GBE appears unlikely to reduce the exposure of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, while concentrations of unboosted protease inhibitors may be affected. Limitations to our study include the single sequence design and the evaluation of a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor exclusively.

Simultaneous Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Lopinavir and Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Adults

Lopinavir is a protease inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV infection. It is coformulated with low doses of ritonavir in order to enhance its pharmacokinetic profile. After oral administration, plasma concentrations of lopinavir can vary widely between different HIV-infected patients. To develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir administered simultaneously in a population of HIV-infected adults. The model sought was to incorporate patient characteristics influencing variability in the drug concentration and the interaction between the two compounds. HIV-infected adults on stable therapy with oral lopinavir/ritonavir in routine clinical practice for at least 4 weeks were included. A concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and blood samples were collected immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after a morning lopinavir/ritonavir dose. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. First, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed for lopinavir and for ritonavir separately. The pharmacokinetic parameters, interindividual variability and residual error were estimated, and the influence of different patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was explored. Then, a simultaneous model estimating the pharmacokinetics of both drugs together and incorporating the influence of ritonavir exposure on oral clearance (CL/F) of lopinavir was developed. Population analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM version V software). The bias and precision of the final model were assessed through Monte Carlo simulations and data-splitting techniques. A total of 53 and 25 Caucasian patients were included in two datasets for model building and model validation, respectively. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were described by one-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination. The presence of advanced liver fibrosis decreased CL/F of ritonavir by nearly half. The volume of distribution after oral administration (Vd/F) and CL/F of lopinavir were reduced as alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations increased. CL/F of lopinavir was inhibited by ritonavir concentrations following a maximum-effect model (maximum inhibition [Imax] = 1, concentration producing 50% of the I(max) [IC50] = 0.36 mg/L). The final model appropriately predicted plasma concentrations in the model-validation dataset with no systematic bias and adequate precision. A population model to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was developed and validated in HIV-infected patients. Bayesian estimates of the individual parameters of ritonavir and lopinavir could be useful to predict lopinavir exposure based on the presence of advanced liver fibrosis and the AAG concentration in an individual manner, with the aim of maximizing the chances of treatment success.

Steady-State Pharmacokinetic and Safety Profiles of Voriconazole and Ritonavir in Healthy Male Subjects

Since there is a likelihood of coadministration of voriconazole and ritonavir, two studies were conducted to evaluate the potential of drug interaction. Study A was a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, parallel-group trial (n = 34). Study B had the same design without the placebo group (n = 17). In period 1, subjects received 200 mg voriconazole or placebo twice daily (BID) for 3 days (400 mg BID on day 1). In period 2, following a 7-day washout, subjects received ritonavir alone at 400 mg BID (study A) or 100 mg BID (study B) for 10 days (days 11 to 20), and then ritonavir was coadministered with 200 mg BID voriconazole or placebo for the next 10 days (days 21 to 30). Serial plasma samples were collected on days 3, 20, and 30, and safety data were collected throughout the study. High-dose (400 mg BID) ritonavir substantially reduced the steady-state mean voriconazole exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h [AUC(0-12)], -82%; maximum concentration [C(max)], -66%). However, the effect of low-dose (100 mg BID) ritonavir was less pronounced (AUC(0-12), -39%; C(max), -24%). The decrease in voriconazole exposure was probably due to the induction of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 by ritonavir. It is interesting that one subject in each study exhibited the opposite effect of ritonavir on voriconazole exposure (a 2.5- to 3-fold increase), probably due to lack of CYP2C19. Voriconazole had no apparent effect on the exposure of high-dose ritonavir but slightly decreased the exposure of low-dose ritonavir (AUC(0-12), -14%; C(max), -24%). The safety profile of combination therapy was not notably different from that of voriconazole or ritonavir alone. Due to the significant effect of ritonavir on voriconazole exposure, coadministration of voriconazole with 400 mg BID ritonavir is contraindicated; coadministration with 100 mg BID ritonavir should be avoided, unless an assessment of the benefit/risk to the patient justifies the use.

Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir Increases Plasma Ketoconazole and Ritonavir Exposure, while Amprenavir Exposure Remains Unchanged

Plasma ketoconazole (KETO), amprenavir (APV), and ritonavir (RTV) pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 15 healthy subjects after being treated with KETO at 200 mg once daily (QD), fosamprenavir (FPV)/RTV at 700/100 mg twice daily (BID), and then KETO at 200 mg QD plus FPV/RTV at 700/100 mg BID in this open-label study. The KETO area under the concentration-time curve at steady state was increased 2.69-fold with FPV/RTV. APV exposure was unchanged, and RTV exposure was slightly increased.

The Tablet Formulation of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Provides Similar Bioavailability to the Soft-Gelatin Capsule Formulation With Less Pharmacokinetic Variability and Diminished Food Effect

Lopinavir, an HIV protease inhibitor, is coformulated with ritonavir to enhance the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of lopinavir. The original solid oral formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir, a soft-gelatin capsule (SGC), requires refrigerated storage, is taken as 6 capsules daily at the recommended adult dose, and is administered with food to maximize the bioavailability of lopinavir. Melt extrusion technology was used to produce a tablet formulation reducing the number of dosage units administered per day and simplifying storage requirements. Three studies assessed the bioavailability of tablet doses of lopinavir/ritonavir at 800/200 mg or 400/100 mg under different meal conditions compared with equal doses of the SGC after a moderate-fat meal. The tablet was bioequivalent to the SGC after a moderate-fat meal with respect to lopinavir and ritonavir areas under the concentration-time curve. Compared with the SGC formulation, the tablet formulation resulted in more consistent lopinavir and ritonavir exposures within and across studies and across meal conditions. The diminished food effect and decreased variability of the tablet are likely to result in more consistent lopinavir and ritonavir exposures, minimizing the likelihood of extreme high or low values compared with the SGC.

Lack of Effect of Gastric Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Patients

Recent studies have shown that coadministration of certain protease inhibitors (PIs) with gastric acid-reducing agents results in decreased plasma concentrations of the PI. To assess the effect of acid-reducing agents on lopinavir/ritonavir, data from two clinical trials (n = 38 and 190) were pooled. Both trials randomized antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients to receive lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice-daily or 800/200 mg once-daily in combination with stavudine and lamivudine, or tenofovir and emtricitabine. Concurrent administration of gastric acid-reducing agents including antacids of various brand names, proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole), and H(2)-receptor antagonists (ranitidine, famotidine, cimetidine, and nizatidine) was reported in both trials. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. Thirty subjects were considered users of acid-reducing agents at the times of pharmacokinetic evaluation. HIV-infected patients who received gastric acid-reducing agents during administration of lopinavir/ritonavir-based treatment regimens did not appear to have a reduction in lopinavir or ritonavir exposures.

HIV Protease Inhibitors Selectively Induce Gene Expression Alterations Associated with Reduced Calcium Deposition in Primary Human Osteoblasts

HIV-infected patients are at increased risk of decreased bone mineral density. Some studies have implicated antiretroviral therapy as a contributor to the decreased bone mineral density seen in treated HIV-1 patients. In this study we explore the interactions between protease inhibitors (PI) and primary human osteoblast gene expression, highlighting a group of dysregulated genes that potentially are key factors in reducing bone formation. Runx-2 mRNA expression, calcium deposition, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity decreased significantly in human osteoblast cultures after exposure to the PIs nelfinavir (NFV) and indinavir (IDV). Saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), indinavir (IDV), or nelfinavir (NFV) exposure induced significant changes in genotypic expression as assessed by gene-chip microarray analysis. The altered genes from each group were compared to each other and a list of 8 upregulated and 13 downregulated genes only after NFV and IDV exposure was identified. This set includes TIMP-3, which has previously been demonstrated to be involved in osteoblast differentiation and extracellular matrix development processes. Silencing TIMP-3 mRNA expression using siRNA duplexes enhanced calcium deposition and ALP activity significantly, even after exposure to NFV and IDV. Our data suggest a link between reduced osteoblastic phenotype and a group of 21 altered genes following NFV and IDV treatment, and also suggest TIMP-3 may be involved in the PI-induced inhibition of osteoblast function.

Lopinavir/Ritonavir Pharmacokinetics in HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Co-Infected Patients without Liver Function Impairment

To assess the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection and the extent of liver fibrosis on lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients without liver function impairment. Cross-sectional, comparative study enrolling HIV-infected adults receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily). HIV/HCV co-infected patients were grouped as having advanced fibrosis (HCV+/FIB+, n=7) or not (HCV+/FIB-, n=8) based on the FIB-4 index. A full concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and blood samples were collected before (0), and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after a lopinavir/ritonavir dose. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Maximum and minimum plasma concentrations (Cmax and Cmin), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC12), apparent oral clearance at steady state (CLss/F), and apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (Vd/F) were calculated for each individual using a non-compartmental approach. Twenty-six HCV- and 22 HCV+patients were enrolled. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were comparable between HCV- and HCV+patients. However, the Vd/F of lopinavir was 125% higher in HCV+/FIB+patients than in HCV-patients (p=0.015) and 107% higher than in HCV+/FIB-(p=0.040) patients. The CLss/F of ritonavir was 40% lower in HCV+/FIB+patients than in HCV-patients (p=0.005) and 44% lower than in HCV+/FIB-patients (p=0.040). Thus, for ritonavir AUC12, Cmax and Cmin in HCV+/FIB+patients were 63%, 86% and 100% higher, respectively, when compared with those parameters in HCV-patients (p=0.005, p=0.012 and p=0.015, respectively), and 80%, 86% and 100% higher, respectively, when compared with levels in HCV+/FIB- patients (p=0.040, p=0.040 and p=0.029, respectively). Lopinavir exposure is similar in HIV-infected patients with or without HCV co-infection and without liver function impairment. However, ritonavir exposure may be higher in this setting, particularly in individuals with advanced liver fibrosis.

Concomitant intake of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) does not impair plasma exposure of ritonavir (RTV) boosted atazanavir (ATV) in HIV-1 infected adults

Background Recent data showed contradictory results on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of the protease inhibitor ATV and the nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor TDF in HIV-1 infected adults. TDF co-administration decreases plasma levels of ATV 400mg QD alone, but has no impact on plasma trough levels of ATV 300mg QD when boosted with low-dose RTV. Methods We compared steady state plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of ATV/RTV in a cohort of 53 (34male/19female) outpatients of comparable baseline characteristics, taking ATV/RTV 300/100mg QD+ 2–4 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) either with TDF (n=39) or without TDF (n=14). Following a standardized PK protocol, plasma drug levels were measured by LC/MS/MS after at least 4 weeks on the regimen prior to and 1,2,4,6,9,12,24h after drug intake. Noncompartmental AUCss, Cmin, Cmax and CLtot were subject to statistical analysis. Results see Table. Conclusions Co-administration of TDF does not impair the steady state plasma exposure of ATV or RTV in a limited number of HIV-1 infected patients. ATV/RTV 300/100mg+TDF/NRTI appears to be a pharmacokinetically suitable once-daily therapy regimen. Further clinical and PK data are obtained in this observational cohort. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77, P18–P18; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.11.072 Table 1. ATV/RTV 300/100mg QD +NRTI with TDF mean (±SD) +NRTI without TDF mean (±SD) Mann-Whitney U-Test: p-value AUCss(ng24h/mL) ATV 40461 (±20824) 42193 (±19376) .68 RTV 11006 (±7623) 8774 (±3819) .55 Cmin(ng/mL) ATV 522 (±441) 663 (±444) .14 RTV 75 (±74) 61 (±35) .75 Cmax(ng/mL) ATV 3582 (±1877) 3772 (±2008) .86 RTV 1275 (±896) 1015 (±453) .39 CLtot(mL/min) ATV 174 (±127) 145 (±72) .67 RTV 231 (±161) 232 (±117) .57

Combining fosamprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir substantially reduces amprenavir and lopinavir exposure: ACTG protocol A5143 results

To evaluate fosamprenavir/lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (RTV), fosamprenavir/RTV, or LPV/RTV in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients. Lack of drug interaction data prompted a pharmacokinetic substudy to minimize subject risk. Multi-center, open-label, selectively randomized, steady-state pharmacokinetic study in HIV-infected subjects. A planned independent interim review occurred after at least eight subjects were randomized to each arm. Subjects received twice daily LPV/RTV 400/100 mg (arm A; n = 8); fosamprenavir/RTV 700/100 mg (arm B; n = 8) or LPV/RTV/fosamprenavir 400/100/700 mg (arm C; n = 17). Plasma samples were collected over 12 h between study weeks 2 and 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared based on a one-sided t-test on log-transformed data with a Peto stopping boundary (P < 0.001). Amprenavir mean area under the curve over 12 h (AUC0-12 h) and concentration at 12 h (C12 h) (microg/ml) were, respectively, 42.7 microg x h/ml (range, 33.1-55.1) and 2.4 microg/ml (range, 1.4-3.2) in arm B and 17.4 microg x h/ml (range, 4.6-41.3) and 0.9 microg/ml (range, 0.2-2.7) in arm C: geometric mean ratio (GMR) arm C:B was 0.36 [99.9% upper confidence boundary (UCB), 0.64] and 0.31 (99.9% h UCB, 0.61), respectively (P < or = 0.0001). Lopinavir AUC0-12 h and C12 h were, respectively, 95.3 microg x h/ml (range, 60.3-119.3) and 6.3 microg/ml (range, 2.2-9.2) in arm A and 54.4 microg x h/ml (range, 23.5-112.2) and 3.0 microg/ml (range, 0.4-7.9) in arm C: GMR arm C:A of 0.52 (99.9% UCB, 0.89) and 0.39 (99.9% UCB, 0.98), respectively (P < or = 0.0008). Ritonavir exposure was not significantly different between arms. APV and LPV exposures are significantly reduced using LPV/RTV/fosamprenavir, possibly increasing the risk of virologic failure. Consequently, A5143 was closed to enrollment.

Simplification of therapeutic drug monitoring for twice-daily regimens of lopinavir/ritonavir for HIV infection.

Cost and inconvenience limit the application of full 12-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral medications. We explore whether lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) exposures can be estimated with limited sampling for patients taking twice-daily LPV/RTV. One hundred and one PK profiles from 81 patients, most receiving salvage therapies including twice-daily LPV/RTV, were obtained for the analysis. After a minimum of 2 weeks on a stable regimen, blood was drawn immediately before and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after a timed medication dose. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC-MS-MS assay. Peak concentrations, evening troughs, and AUC0-12 h were entered into linear and log10-log10 linear regression models to determine the best correlation with LPV and RTV plasma concentrations using a maximum of 2 time points. The accuracy and precision of PK parameter estimates of the resultant models were tested on data collected for an additional 25 patients. Twelve models using various combinations of 2 timed LPV concentrations afforded accurate (maximum % bias = -6.45) and precise (relative standard deviation < 15%) estimates for the LPV peak concentration or AUC0-12h. Four sets of 2 concentrations provided simultaneous estimates of both PK parameters, with the best estimates derived from data collected at 2 and 6 hours postdose. Evening trough concentrations were the best estimators of the daily nadir; however, no adequate substitute for collecting blood 12 hours postdose emerged from this analysis.

Factors related to lipodystrophy and metabolic alterations in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Morphologic and metabolic changes associated with protease inhibitor (PI) therapy have been reported since the introduction of PIs for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. These changes were measured 12-20 months after initiation of PI therapy in a cross-sectional study involving 614 patients from the Antiprotéases Cohorte (APROCO) Study (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida-EP11). The prevalence was 21% for isolated peripheral atrophy, 17% for isolated fat accumulation, 24% for mixed syndrome, 23% for glucose metabolism alterations, 28% for hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride level, > or =2.2 mM), and 57% for hypercholesterolemia (cholesterol level, > or =5.5 mM). Age was significantly associated with different phenotypes of lipodystrophy and metabolic alterations, but body-mass index, CD4(+) cell count, and type of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or PI received were not constantly associated with these changes. Furthermore, in all models tested, exposure to stavudine was associated with lipoatrophy and exposure of ritonavir was associated with hypertriglyceridemia. Detection and management of these disorders should be implemented to prevent further complications.

Ritonavir induces P-glycoprotein expression, multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) expression, and drug transporter-mediated activity in a human intestinal cell line

The present study characterized the response of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) to chronic ritonavir (RIT) exposure by assessing increases in P-gp and MRP1 protein expression and activity. LS-180V intestinal carcinoma cells were exposed for 3 days to 1–100 μM RIT concurrently with controls. P-gp and MRP1 protein was quantified by Western blot analysis. Cell accumulation assays, using the P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 (RH123), the P-gp/MRP1 substrate doxorubicin (DOX), and the MRP substrate carboxyfluorescein (CBF), were performed as a measure of transporter activity. RIT strongly induced P-gp and MRP1 expression (maximum 6-fold and 3-fold increases, respectively) in a concentration-dependent fashion. Following extended exposure to RIT (> 10 μM), cells accumulated < 50% of the RH123 and DOX compared with controls, whereas accumulation of CBF was decreased by 30% at 30 μM. Differences in cell accumulation of RH123 could be eliminated with verapamil (100 μM; a P-gp inhibitor), whereas decreased DOX cell accumulation was only partially reversed by verapamil. Indomethacin (100 μM; an MRP1 inhibitor) had no significant effect on RH123 or DOX accumulation, suggesting limited MRP1-mediated activity. Thus, RIT induced protein expression of P-gp and MRP1 and increased cellular drug exclusion of RH123, DOX, and CBF. Similar in vivo phenomena may occur during anti-HIV drug therapy, explaining potential decrements in therapeutic efficacy due to decreases in bioavailability or alterations in drug distribution. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 90:1829–1837, 2001